At the end of 2024, Alphabet had 183,323 full-time employees. Up until 2015, these figures were reported as Google employees. The alphabet was created through a corporate restructuring of Google in October 2015 and became the parent company of Google as well as several of its former subsidiaries, including Calico, X, CapitalG and Sidewalk Labs. Google’s popularity Google is one of the most famous internet companies in the world, and in May 2024, the most visited multi-platform website in the United States, with over 278 million U.S. unique visitors during that month alone. The California-based multinational internet company has been delivering digital products and services since its creation in 1996. Due to the popularity of its search engine, the verb “to google” has entered the everyday language and the Oxford Dictionary. In addition to that, the company has also crafted itself as one of the most desirable employers, largely due to the many perks it offers in its offices worldwide. Some of the most appealing aspects of working for Google according to its employees include readily available foods and drinks, good working conditions, and ample communal spaces for relaxing, as well as many health benefits and generous salaries. Google offices and employees As of February 2022, Google and Alphabet had more than 70 offices in over 200 cities throughout 50 around the globe, including Germany, Czechia, Finland, Canada, Mexico, Turkey, and New Zealand. The company’s headquarters, also known as “the Googleplex,” are located in Mountain View, California, while other office locations in American states include New York, Georgia, Texas, Washington D.C., and Massachusetts. As Alphabet, the company employs a total over 182 thousand full-time staff, in addition to many other temporary and internship positions. Per the most recent diversity report published in July 2021, most Google employees were male and only 34 percent were female – a figure that has barely changed since the company started reporting on the diversity of its employees in 2016. Furthermore, as of 2021, women occupied only 28.1 percent of leadership positions and 24.6 percent of tech positions. Although Google has regularly stated that the company is committed to promoting ethnic diversity among its personnel, some 54.4 percent of its U.S. employees are White and only 3.3 percent of employees are Black.

The Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW) program publishes a quarterly count of employment and wages reported by employers covering more than 95 percent of U.S. jobs, available at the county, MSA, state and national levels by industry. The dataset, hosted as part of the Cloud Public Datasets Program , gives county-level information on jobs and wages each quarter starting in 1990. The counties are identified by geoid which can easily be joined with both all FIPS codes or US county boundaries to unlock new insights within the data. Both of these datasets are available in BigQuery through the Cloud Public Datasets Cleaning and onboarding support for this dataset is provided by CARTO . This public dataset is hosted in Google BigQuery and is included in BigQuery's 1TB/mo of free tier processing. This means that each user receives 1TB of free BigQuery processing every month, which can be used to run queries on this public dataset. Watch this short video to learn how to get started quickly using BigQuery to access public datasets. What is BigQuery .

Introducing Job Posting Datasets: Uncover labor market insights!

Elevate your recruitment strategies, forecast future labor industry trends, and unearth investment opportunities with Job Posting Datasets.

Job Posting Datasets Source:

1. Indeed: Access datasets from Indeed, a leading employment website known for its comprehensive job listings.

2. Glassdoor: Receive ready-to-use employee reviews, salary ranges, and job openings from Glassdoor.

3. StackShare: Access StackShare datasets to make data-driven technology decisions.

Job Posting Datasets provide meticulously acquired and parsed data, freeing you to focus on analysis. You'll receive clean, structured, ready-to-use job posting data, including job titles, company names, seniority levels, industries, locations, salaries, and employment types.

Choose your preferred dataset delivery options for convenience:

Receive datasets in various formats, including CSV, JSON, and more. Opt for storage solutions such as AWS S3, Google Cloud Storage, and more. Customize data delivery frequencies, whether one-time or per your agreed schedule.

Why Choose Oxylabs Job Posting Datasets:

1. Fresh and accurate data: Access clean and structured job posting datasets collected by our seasoned web scraping professionals, enabling you to dive into analysis.

2. Time and resource savings: Focus on data analysis and your core business objectives while we efficiently handle the data extraction process cost-effectively.

3. Customized solutions: Tailor our approach to your business needs, ensuring your goals are met.

4. Legal compliance: Partner with a trusted leader in ethical data collection. Oxylabs is a founding member of the Ethical Web Data Collection Initiative, aligning with GDPR and CCPA best practices.

Pricing Options:

Standard Datasets: choose from various ready-to-use datasets with standardized data schemas, priced from $1,000/month.

Custom Datasets: Tailor datasets from any public web domain to your unique business needs. Contact our sales team for custom pricing.

Experience a seamless journey with Oxylabs:

• Understanding your data needs: We work closely to understand your business nature and daily operations, defining your unique data requirements.
• Developing a customized solution: Our experts create a custom framework to extract public data using our in-house web scraping infrastructure.
• Delivering data sample: We provide a sample for your feedback on data quality and the entire delivery process.
• Continuous data delivery: We continuously collect public data and deliver custom datasets per the agreed frequency.

Effortlessly access fresh job posting data with Oxylabs Job Posting Datasets.

This is the summation over all time of weekly data from the Google Analytics tag for the Open Data Portal at OpenData.fcgov.com. The only datasets included here are those with titles matching 'Fort Collins City Employee Earnings'.

Analytics shown are presumed to be non-City-employees, as these data come from computers external to the City network. Each day starting at the first day for which there are data is included, and the URL is either a specific page or "all", specifying that every page in the domain is included. Specific-page URLs are filtered to the main Portal page or data assets, so "all" may capture more pages than specified individually.

This dataset contains current and historical demographic data on Google's workforce since the company began publishing diversity data in 2014. It includes data collected for government reporting and voluntary employee self-identification globally relating to hiring, retention, and representation categorized by race, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, disability status, and military status. In some instances, the data is limited due to various government policies around the world and the desire to protect Googler confidentiality. All data in this dataset will be updated yearly upon publication of Google’s Diversity Annual Report . Google uses this data to inform its diversity, equity, and inclusion work. More information on our methodology can be found in the Diversity Annual Report. This public dataset is hosted in Google BigQuery and is included in BigQuery's 1TB/mo of free tier processing. This means that each user receives 1TB of free BigQuery processing every month, which can be used to run queries on this public dataset. Watch this short video to learn how to get started quickly using BigQuery to access public datasets. What is BigQuery .

Company Datasets for valuable business insights!

Discover new business prospects, identify investment opportunities, track competitor performance, and streamline your sales efforts with comprehensive Company Datasets.

These datasets are sourced from top industry providers, ensuring you have access to high-quality information:

• Owler: Gain valuable business insights and competitive intelligence. -AngelList: Receive fresh startup data transformed into actionable insights. -CrunchBase: Access clean, parsed, and ready-to-use business data from private and public companies. -Craft.co: Make data-informed business decisions with Craft.co's company datasets. -Product Hunt: Harness the Product Hunt dataset, a leader in curating the best new products.

We provide fresh and ready-to-use company data, eliminating the need for complex scraping and parsing. Our data includes crucial details such as:

• Company name;
• Size;
• Founding date;
• Location;
• Industry;
• Revenue;
• Employee count;
• Competitors.

You can choose your preferred data delivery method, including various storage options, delivery frequency, and input/output formats.

Receive datasets in CSV, JSON, and other formats, with storage options like AWS S3 and Google Cloud Storage. Opt for one-time, monthly, quarterly, or bi-annual data delivery.

With Oxylabs Datasets, you can count on:

• Fresh and accurate data collected and parsed by our expert web scraping team.
• Time and resource savings, allowing you to focus on data analysis and achieving your business goals.
• A customized approach tailored to your specific business needs.
• Legal compliance in line with GDPR and CCPA standards, thanks to our membership in the Ethical Web Data Collection Initiative.

Pricing Options:

Standard Datasets: choose from various ready-to-use datasets with standardized data schemas, priced from $1,000/month.

Custom Datasets: Tailor datasets from any public web domain to your unique business needs. Contact our sales team for custom pricing.

Experience a seamless journey with Oxylabs:

• Understanding your data needs: We work closely to understand your business nature and daily operations, defining your unique data requirements.
• Developing a customized solution: Our experts create a custom framework to extract public data using our in-house web scraping infrastructure.
• Delivering data sample: We provide a sample for your feedback on data quality and the entire delivery process.
• Continuous data delivery: We continuously collect public data and deliver custom datasets per the agreed frequency.

Unlock the power of data with Oxylabs' Company Datasets and supercharge your business insights today!

This dataset contains raw, unprocessed data files pertaining to the management tool group focused on 'Talent & Employee Engagement', including concepts like Employee Engagement Surveys/Systems and Corporate Codes of Ethics. The data originates from five distinct sources, each reflecting different facets of the tool's prominence and usage over time. Files preserve the original metrics and temporal granularity before any comparative normalization or harmonization. Data Sources & File Details: Google Trends File (Prefix: GT_): Metric: Relative Search Interest (RSI) Index (0-100 scale). Keywords Used: "corporate code of ethics" + "employee engagement" + "employee engagement management" Time Period: January 2004 - January 2025 (Native Monthly Resolution). Scope: Global Web Search, broad categorization. Extraction Date: Data extracted January 2025. Notes: Index relative to peak interest within the period for these terms. Reflects public/professional search interest trends. Based on probabilistic sampling. Source URL: Google Trends Query Google Books Ngram Viewer File (Prefix: GB_): Metric: Annual Relative Frequency (% of total n-grams in the corpus). Keywords Used: Corporate Code of Ethics+Employee Engagement Programs+Employee Engagement Surveys+Employee Engagement Time Period: 1950 - 2022 (Annual Resolution). Corpus: English. Parameters: Case Insensitive OFF, Smoothing 0. Extraction Date: Data extracted January 2025. Notes: Reflects term usage frequency in Google's digitized book corpus. Subject to corpus limitations (English bias, coverage). Source URL: Ngram Viewer Query Crossref.org File (Prefix: CR_): Metric: Absolute count of publications per month matching keywords. Keywords Used: ("corporate code of ethics" OR "employee engagement" OR "employee engagement programs" OR "employee engagement surveys") AND ("human resources" OR "management" OR "organizational" OR "culture" OR "development" OR "performance") Time Period: 1950 - 2025 (Queried for monthly counts based on publication date metadata). Search Fields: Title, Abstract. Extraction Date: Data extracted January 2025. Notes: Reflects volume of relevant academic publications indexed by Crossref. Deduplicated using DOIs; records without DOIs omitted. Source URL: Crossref Search Query Bain & Co. Survey - Usability File (Prefix: BU_): Metric: Original Percentage (%) of executives reporting tool usage. Tool Names/Years Included: Corporate Code of Ethics (2002); Employee Engagement Surveys (2012, 2014); Employee Engagement Systems (2017, 2022). Respondent Profile: CEOs, CFOs, COOs, other senior leaders; global, multi-sector. Source: Bain & Company Management Tools & Trends publications (Rigby D., Bilodeau B., Ronan C. et al., various years: 2003, 2013, 2015, 2017, 2023). Data Compilation Period: July 2024 - January 2025. Notes: Data points correspond to specific survey years. Sample sizes: 2002/708; 2012/1208; 2014/1067; 2017/1268; 2022/1068. Bain & Co. Survey - Satisfaction File (Prefix: BS_): Metric: Original Average Satisfaction Score (Scale 0-5). Tool Names/Years Included: Corporate Code of Ethics (2002); Employee Engagement Surveys (2012, 2014); Employee Engagement Systems (2017, 2022). Respondent Profile: CEOs, CFOs, COOs, other senior leaders; global, multi-sector. Source: Bain & Company Management Tools & Trends publications (Rigby D., Bilodeau B., Ronan C. et al., various years: 2003, 2013, 2015, 2017, 2023). Data Compilation Period: July 2024 - January 2025. Notes: Data points correspond to specific survey years. Sample sizes: 2002/708; 2012/1208; 2014/1067; 2017/1268; 2022/1068. Reflects subjective executive perception of utility. File Naming Convention: Files generally follow the pattern: PREFIX_Tool.csv, where the PREFIX indicates the data source: GT_: Google Trends GB_: Google Books Ngram CR_: Crossref.org (Count Data for this Raw Dataset) BU_: Bain & Company Survey (Usability) BS_: Bain & Company Survey (Satisfaction) The essential identification comes from the PREFIX and the Tool Name segment. This dataset resides within the 'Management Tool Source Data (Raw Extracts)' Dataverse.

🔗 LinkedIn Job Postings Data - Comprehensive Professional Intelligence for HR Strategy & Market Research

LinkedIn Job Postings Data represents the most comprehensive professional intelligence dataset available, delivering structured insights across millions of LinkedIn job postings, LinkedIn job listings, and LinkedIn career opportunities. Canaria's enriched LinkedIn Job Postings Data transforms raw LinkedIn job market information into actionable business intelligence—normalized, deduplicated, and enhanced with AI-powered enrichment for deep workforce analytics, talent acquisition, and market research.

This premium LinkedIn job postings dataset is engineered to help HR professionals, recruiters, analysts, and business strategists answer mission-critical questions: • What LinkedIn job opportunities are available in target companies? • Which skills are trending in LinkedIn job postings across specific industries? • How are companies advertising their LinkedIn career opportunities? • What are the salary expectations across different LinkedIn job listings and regions?

With real-time updates and comprehensive LinkedIn job posting enrichment, our data provides unparalleled visibility into LinkedIn job market trends, hiring patterns, and workforce dynamics.

🧠 Use Cases: What This LinkedIn Job Postings Data Solves

Our dataset transforms LinkedIn job advertisements, market information, and career listings into structured, analyzable insights—powering everything from talent acquisition to competitive intelligence and job market research.

Talent Acquisition & LinkedIn Recruiting Intelligence • LinkedIn job market mapping • LinkedIn career opportunity intelligence • LinkedIn job posting competitive analysis • LinkedIn job skills gap identification

HR Strategy & Workforce Analytics • Organizational network analysis • Employee mobility tracking • Compensation benchmarking • Diversity & inclusion analytics • Workforce planning intelligence • Skills evolution monitoring

Market Research & Competitive Intelligence • Company growth analysis • Industry trend identification • Competitive talent mapping • Market entry intelligence • Partnership & business development • Investment due diligence

LinkedIn Job Market Research & Economic Analysis • Regional LinkedIn job analysis • LinkedIn job skills demand forecasting • LinkedIn job economic impact assessment • LinkedIn job education-industry alignment • LinkedIn remote job trend analysis • LinkedIn career development ROI

🌐 What Makes This LinkedIn Job Postings Data Unique

AI-Enhanced LinkedIn Job Intelligence • LinkedIn job posting enrichment with advanced NLP • LinkedIn job seniority classification • LinkedIn job industry expertise mapping • LinkedIn job career progression modeling

Comprehensive LinkedIn Job Market Intelligence • Real-time LinkedIn job postings with salary, requirements, and company insights • LinkedIn recruiting activity tracking • LinkedIn job application analytics • LinkedIn job skills demand analysis • LinkedIn compensation intelligence

Company & Organizational Intelligence • Company growth indicators • Cultural & values intelligence • Competitive positioning

LinkedIn Job Data Quality & Normalization • Advanced LinkedIn job deduplication • LinkedIn job skills taxonomy standardization • LinkedIn job geographic normalization • LinkedIn job company matching • LinkedIn job education standardization

🎯 Who Uses Canaria's LinkedIn Data

HR & Talent Acquisition Teams • Optimize recruiting pipelines • Benchmark compensation • Identify talent pools • Develop data-driven hiring strategies

Market Research & Intelligence Analysts • Track industry trends • Build competitive intelligence models • Analyze workforce dynamics

HR Technology & Analytics Platforms • Power recruiting tools and analytics solutions • Fuel compensation engines and dashboards

Academic & Economic Researchers • Study labor market dynamics • Analyze career mobility trends • Research professional development

Government & Policy Organizations • Evaluate workforce development programs • Monitor skills gaps • Inform economic initiatives

📌 Summary

Canaria's LinkedIn Job Postings Data delivers the most comprehensive LinkedIn job market intelligence available. It combines job posting insights, recruiting intelligence, and organizational data in one unified dataset. With AI-enhanced enrichment, real-time updates, and enterprise-grade data quality, it supports advanced HR analytics, talent acquisition, job market research, and competitive intelligence.

🏢 About Canaria Inc. Canaria Inc. is a leader in alternative data, specializing in job market intelligence, LinkedIn company data, Glassdoor salary analytics, and Google Maps location insights. We deliver clean, structured, and enriched datasets at scale using proprietary data scraping pipelines and advanced AI/LLM-based modeling, all backed by human validation. Our platform also includes Google Maps data, providing verified business locatio...

This data table contains a list of all hospitals that have been registered with Medicare. This list includes addresses, phone numbers, hospital types and quality of care information. The quality of care data is provided for over 4,000 Medicare-certified hospitals, including over 130 Veterans Administration (VA) medical centers, across the country. You can use this data to find hospitals and compare the quality of their care. This data was created through the efforts of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) in collaboration with organizations representing consumers, hospitals, doctors, employers, accrediting organizations, and other federal agencies. This public dataset is hosted in Google BigQuery and is included in BigQuery's 1TB/mo of free tier processing. This means that each user receives 1TB of free BigQuery processing every month, which can be used to run queries on this public dataset. Watch this short video to learn how to get started quickly using BigQuery to access public datasets. What is BigQuery .

As there was no large publicly available cross-domain dataset for comparative argument mining, we create one composed of sentences, potentially annotated with BETTER / WORSE markers (the first object is better / worse than the second object) or NONE (the sentence does not contain a comparison of the target objects). The BETTER sentences stand for a pro-argument in favor of the first compared object and WORSE-sentences represent a con-argument and favor the second object. We aim for minimizing dataset domain-specific biases in order to capture the nature of comparison and not the nature of the particular domains, thus decided to control the specificity of domains by the selection of comparison targets. We hypothesized and could confirm in preliminary experiments that comparison targets usually have a common hypernym (i.e., are instances of the same class), which we utilized for selection of the compared objects pairs. The most specific domain we choose, is computer science with comparison targets like programming languages, database products and technology standards such as Bluetooth or Ethernet. Many computer science concepts can be compared objectively (e.g., on transmission speed or suitability for certain applications). The objects for this domain were manually extracted from List of-articles at Wikipedia. In the annotation process, annotators were asked to only label sentences from this domain if they had some basic knowledge in computer science. The second, broader domain is brands. It contains objects of different types (e.g., cars, electronics, and food). As brands are present in everyday life, anyone should be able to label the majority of sentences containing well-known brands such as Coca-Cola or Mercedes. Again, targets for this domain were manually extracted from `List of''-articles at Wikipedia.The third domain is not restricted to any topic: random. For each of 24~randomly selected seed words 10 similar words were collected based on the distributional similarity API of JoBimText (http://www.jobimtext.org). Seed words created using randomlists.com: book, car, carpenter, cellphone, Christmas, coffee, cork, Florida, hamster, hiking, Hoover, Metallica, NBC, Netflix, ninja, pencil, salad, soccer, Starbucks, sword, Tolkien, wine, wood, XBox, Yale.Especially for brands and computer science, the resulting object lists were large (4493 in brands and 1339 in computer science). In a manual inspection, low-frequency and ambiguous objects were removed from all object lists (e.g., RAID (a hardware concept) and Unity (a game engine) are also regularly used nouns). The remaining objects were combined to pairs. For each object type (seed Wikipedia list page or the seed word), all possible combinations were created. These pairs were then used to find sentences containing both objects. The aforementioned approaches to selecting compared objects pairs tend minimize inclusion of the domain specific data, but do not solve the problem fully though. We keep open a question of extending dataset with diverse object pairs including abstract concepts for future work. As for the sentence mining, we used the publicly available index of dependency-parsed sentences from the Common Crawl corpus containing over 14 billion English sentences filtered for duplicates. This index was queried for sentences containing both objects of each pair. For 90% of the pairs, we also added comparative cue words (better, easier, faster, nicer, wiser, cooler, decent, safer, superior, solid, terrific, worse, harder, slower, poorly, uglier, poorer, lousy, nastier, inferior, mediocre) to the query in order to bias the selection towards comparisons but at the same time admit comparisons that do not contain any of the anticipated cues. This was necessary as a random sampling would have resulted in only a very tiny fraction of comparisons. Note that even sentences containing a cue word do not necessarily express a comparison between the desired targets (dog vs. cat: He's the best pet that you can get, better than a dog or cat.). It is thus especially crucial to enable a classifier to learn not to rely on the existence of clue words only (very likely in a random sample of sentences with very few comparisons). For our corpus, we keep pairs with at least 100 retrieved sentences.From all sentences of those pairs, 2500 for each category were randomly sampled as candidates for a crowdsourced annotation that we conducted on figure-eight.com in several small batches. Each sentence was annotated by at least five trusted workers. We ranked annotations by confidence, which is the figure-eight internal measure of combining annotator trust and voting, and discarded annotations with a confidence below 50%. Of all annotated items, 71% received unanimous votes and for over 85% at least 4 out of 5 workers agreed -- rendering the collection procedure aimed at ease of annotation successful.The final dataset contains 7199 sentences with 271 distinct object pairs. The majority of sentences (over 72%) are non-comparative despite biasing the selection with cue words; in 70% of the comparative sentences, the favored target is named first.You can browse though the data here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1U8i6EU9GUKmHdPnfwXEuBxi0h3aiRCLPRC-3c9ROiOE/edit?usp=sharing Full description of the dataset is available in the workshop paper at ACL 2019 conference. Please cite this paper if you use the data: Franzek, Mirco, Alexander Panchenko, and Chris Biemann. ""Categorization of Comparative Sentences for Argument Mining."" arXiv preprint arXiv:1809.06152 (2018).@inproceedings{franzek2018categorization, title={Categorization of Comparative Sentences for Argument Mining}, author={Panchenko, Alexander and Bondarenko, and Franzek, Mirco and Hagen, Matthias and Biemann, Chris}, booktitle={Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on Argument Mining at ACL'2019}, year={2019}, address={Florence, Italy}}

This version of the CivilComments Dataset provides access to the primary seven labels that were annotated by crowd workers, the toxicity and other tags are a value between 0 and 1 indicating the fraction of annotators that assigned these attributes to the comment text.

The other tags are only available for a fraction of the input examples. They are currently ignored for the main dataset; the CivilCommentsIdentities set includes those labels, but only consists of the subset of the data with them. The other attributes that were part of the original CivilComments release are included only in the raw data. See the Kaggle documentation for more details about the available features.

The comments in this dataset come from an archive of the Civil Comments platform, a commenting plugin for independent news sites. These public comments were created from 2015 - 2017 and appeared on approximately 50 English-language news sites across the world. When Civil Comments shut down in 2017, they chose to make the public comments available in a lasting open archive to enable future research. The original data, published on figshare, includes the public comment text, some associated metadata such as article IDs, publication IDs, timestamps and commenter-generated "civility" labels, but does not include user ids. Jigsaw extended this dataset by adding additional labels for toxicity, identity mentions, as well as covert offensiveness. This data set is an exact replica of the data released for the Jigsaw Unintended Bias in Toxicity Classification Kaggle challenge. This dataset is released under CC0, as is the underlying comment text.

For comments that have a parent_id also in the civil comments data, the text of the previous comment is provided as the "parent_text" feature. Note that the splits were made without regard to this information, so using previous comments may leak some information. The annotators did not have access to the parent text when making the labels.

To use this dataset:

import tensorflow_datasets as tfds

ds = tfds.load('civil_comments', split='train')
for ex in ds.take(4):
 print(ex)

See the guide for more informations on tensorflow_datasets.

United States agricultural researchers have many options for making their data available online. This dataset aggregates the primary sources of ag-related data and determines where researchers are likely to deposit their agricultural data. These data serve as both a current landscape analysis and also as a baseline for future studies of ag research data. Purpose As sources of agricultural data become more numerous and disparate, and collaboration and open data become more expected if not required, this research provides a landscape inventory of online sources of open agricultural data. An inventory of current agricultural data sharing options will help assess how the Ag Data Commons, a platform for USDA-funded data cataloging and publication, can best support data-intensive and multi-disciplinary research. It will also help agricultural librarians assist their researchers in data management and publication. The goals of this study were to

establish where agricultural researchers in the United States-- land grant and USDA researchers, primarily ARS, NRCS, USFS and other agencies -- currently publish their data, including general research data repositories, domain-specific databases, and the top journals compare how much data is in institutional vs. domain-specific vs. federal platforms determine which repositories are recommended by top journals that require or recommend the publication of supporting data ascertain where researchers not affiliated with funding or initiatives possessing a designated open data repository can publish data

Approach The National Agricultural Library team focused on Agricultural Research Service (ARS), Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), and United States Forest Service (USFS) style research data, rather than ag economics, statistics, and social sciences data. To find domain-specific, general, institutional, and federal agency repositories and databases that are open to US research submissions and have some amount of ag data, resources including re3data, libguides, and ARS lists were analysed. Primarily environmental or public health databases were not included, but places where ag grantees would publish data were considered.
Search methods We first compiled a list of known domain specific USDA / ARS datasets / databases that are represented in the Ag Data Commons, including ARS Image Gallery, ARS Nutrition Databases (sub-components), SoyBase, PeanutBase, National Fungus Collection, i5K Workspace @ NAL, and GRIN. We then searched using search engines such as Bing and Google for non-USDA / federal ag databases, using Boolean variations of “agricultural data” /“ag data” / “scientific data” + NOT + USDA (to filter out the federal / USDA results). Most of these results were domain specific, though some contained a mix of data subjects. We then used search engines such as Bing and Google to find top agricultural university repositories using variations of “agriculture”, “ag data” and “university” to find schools with agriculture programs. Using that list of universities, we searched each university web site to see if their institution had a repository for their unique, independent research data if not apparent in the initial web browser search. We found both ag specific university repositories and general university repositories that housed a portion of agricultural data. Ag specific university repositories are included in the list of domain-specific repositories. Results included Columbia University – International Research Institute for Climate and Society, UC Davis – Cover Crops Database, etc. If a general university repository existed, we determined whether that repository could filter to include only data results after our chosen ag search terms were applied. General university databases that contain ag data included Colorado State University Digital Collections, University of Michigan ICPSR (Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research), and University of Minnesota DRUM (Digital Repository of the University of Minnesota). We then split out NCBI (National Center for Biotechnology Information) repositories. Next we searched the internet for open general data repositories using a variety of search engines, and repositories containing a mix of data, journals, books, and other types of records were tested to determine whether that repository could filter for data results after search terms were applied. General subject data repositories include Figshare, Open Science Framework, PANGEA, Protein Data Bank, and Zenodo. Finally, we compared scholarly journal suggestions for data repositories against our list to fill in any missing repositories that might contain agricultural data. Extensive lists of journals were compiled, in which USDA published in 2012 and 2016, combining search results in ARIS, Scopus, and the Forest Service's TreeSearch, plus the USDA web sites Economic Research Service (ERS), National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Natural Resources and Conservation Service (NRCS), Food and Nutrition Service (FNS), Rural Development (RD), and Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS). The top 50 journals' author instructions were consulted to see if they (a) ask or require submitters to provide supplemental data, or (b) require submitters to submit data to open repositories. Data are provided for Journals based on a 2012 and 2016 study of where USDA employees publish their research studies, ranked by number of articles, including 2015/2016 Impact Factor, Author guidelines, Supplemental Data?, Supplemental Data reviewed?, Open Data (Supplemental or in Repository) Required? and Recommended data repositories, as provided in the online author guidelines for each the top 50 journals. Evaluation We ran a series of searches on all resulting general subject databases with the designated search terms. From the results, we noted the total number of datasets in the repository, type of resource searched (datasets, data, images, components, etc.), percentage of the total database that each term comprised, any dataset with a search term that comprised at least 1% and 5% of the total collection, and any search term that returned greater than 100 and greater than 500 results. We compared domain-specific databases and repositories based on parent organization, type of institution, and whether data submissions were dependent on conditions such as funding or affiliation of some kind. Results A summary of the major findings from our data review:

Over half of the top 50 ag-related journals from our profile require or encourage open data for their published authors. There are few general repositories that are both large AND contain a significant portion of ag data in their collection. GBIF (Global Biodiversity Information Facility), ICPSR, and ORNL DAAC were among those that had over 500 datasets returned with at least one ag search term and had that result comprise at least 5% of the total collection.
Not even one quarter of the domain-specific repositories and datasets reviewed allow open submission by any researcher regardless of funding or affiliation.

See included README file for descriptions of each individual data file in this dataset. Resources in this dataset:Resource Title: Journals. File Name: Journals.csvResource Title: Journals - Recommended repositories. File Name: Repos_from_journals.csvResource Title: TDWG presentation. File Name: TDWG_Presentation.pptxResource Title: Domain Specific ag data sources. File Name: domain_specific_ag_databases.csvResource Title: Data Dictionary for Ag Data Repository Inventory. File Name: Ag_Data_Repo_DD.csvResource Title: General repositories containing ag data. File Name: general_repos_1.csvResource Title: README and file inventory. File Name: README_InventoryPublicDBandREepAgData.txt

The Workforce Analytics market is experiencing robust growth, fueled by the increasing need for organizations to optimize workforce performance, enhance employee engagement, and improve strategic decision-making. With a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 15.64% from 2019 to 2024, the market is projected to continue its upward trajectory, driven by factors such as the rising adoption of cloud-based solutions, the growing importance of data-driven insights in HR, and the increasing demand for talent optimization strategies. The market segmentation reveals a diverse landscape, with solutions encompassing talent acquisition, payroll, and performance monitoring; professional, managed, and cloud-based service delivery models; and a broad range of end-user industries including BFSI, manufacturing, IT & Telecom, healthcare, and retail. Large enterprises currently dominate the market share, but the increasing adoption of affordable and accessible solutions is driving growth amongst SMEs. Leading vendors like ADP, IBM, Oracle, and Workday are heavily invested in innovation and expansion, further contributing to the market's dynamic nature. The competitive landscape is characterized by both established players and emerging innovative companies. The market's future hinges on several key factors, including advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) for predictive analytics, the integration of workforce analytics with other HR technologies, and the growing focus on data privacy and security. Addressing these factors will be crucial for sustained growth. Continued expansion into emerging economies and the increasing focus on improving employee experience through data-driven insights will also be major drivers shaping the future of this sector. The development of more sophisticated analytical tools capable of providing actionable insights will also play a significant role in shaping the market's future. Recent developments include: September 2022: ActivTrak partnered with Google Workspace to provide personal work insights that enable employees to improve their digital work habits and wellness. Customers can embed individual work metrics into their Google Workspace applications with ActivTrak for Google Workspace, giving employees immediate visibility to help them redesign their workday, protect focus time, and improve well-being., August 2022: ADP has launched Intelligent Self-Service, which assists employees with common issues before they need to contact their HR department for assistance. Based on an analysis of data from across ADP's ecosystem, the product employs predictive analytics and machine learning to predict which issues may arise.. Key drivers for this market are: Increasing Need to Make a Smarter a Decision About the Talent, Increasing Data in HR Departments related to Pay rolls, Recruitment. Potential restraints include: Increasing Need to Make a Smarter a Decision About the Talent, Increasing Data in HR Departments related to Pay rolls, Recruitment. Notable trends are: Performance Monitoring Offers Potential Growth.

Google Workspace for Market Outlook

In 2023, the global market size for Google Workspace is estimated to be around $12 billion, with a robust compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 18.5% forecasted to reach approximately $41.1 billion by 2032. This remarkable growth is driven by the increasing adoption of cloud-based solutions, the rise in remote work culture, and the necessity for real-time collaboration tools across various industries.

One of the primary growth factors for the Google Workspace market is the paradigm shift towards remote working environments, accelerated by the global pandemic. Organizations across the globe have recognized the need for efficient online collaboration tools to maintain productivity. Google Workspace, with its integrated suite of applications such as Gmail, Google Drive, and Google Meet, has become an essential tool for enabling remote work. The seamless integration of these tools ensures that employees can communicate and collaborate effectively, regardless of their physical location.

Another significant growth driver is the digital transformation initiatives undertaken by enterprises of all sizes. Companies are increasingly leveraging cloud-based solutions to enhance agility, scalability, and cost-efficiency. Google Workspace, with its cloud-native architecture, aligns perfectly with these transformation goals. Its ability to provide real-time updates, ensure data security, and support diverse business processes makes it a preferred choice for enterprises looking to modernize their IT infrastructure.

Furthermore, the emphasis on data security and regulatory compliance has bolstered the adoption of Google Workspace. With growing concerns about data breaches and stringent regulatory requirements, organizations are seeking robust solutions that can safeguard their information while ensuring compliance. Google Workspace offers advanced data protection features, including encryption, secure access controls, and compliance certifications, making it a trusted platform for businesses in highly regulated sectors such as BFSI and healthcare.

In the finance sector, Google Workspace for Finance Software is becoming an indispensable tool for managing complex financial operations. The suite's robust security features and compliance with financial regulations make it a trusted choice for financial institutions. By integrating tools like Google Sheets and Google Drive, finance professionals can collaborate on financial models, share sensitive data securely, and ensure real-time updates across teams. This seamless integration supports the dynamic nature of financial markets, where timely decision-making is crucial. As the finance industry continues to evolve with digital transformation, Google Workspace for Finance Software is poised to play a pivotal role in enhancing operational efficiency and data management.

From a regional perspective, North America is expected to dominate the Google Workspace market during the forecast period, driven by the high concentration of tech-savvy enterprises and the strong presence of Google. The Asia Pacific region is anticipated to exhibit the highest growth rate, fueled by the rapid digitalization of businesses, increased smartphone penetration, and a burgeoning startup ecosystem. Europe, Latin America, and the Middle East & Africa are also projected to contribute significantly to market growth, albeit at varying rates, influenced by factors such as economic conditions, technological infrastructure, and regulatory landscapes.

Component Analysis

Gmail, one of the most widely used components of Google Workspace, continues to be a cornerstone of business communication. Its intuitive interface, robust spam filtering, and seamless integration with other Google Workspace tools make it a preferred choice for millions of users worldwide. The continuous updates and enhancements, such as improved security features and AI-driven functionalities, ensure that Gmail remains relevant and efficient in meeting the evolving communication needs of businesses.

Google Drive is another critical component, offering cloud storage solutions that enable users to store, share, and collaborate on files effortlessly. The ability to access files from any device, coupled with advanced sharing controls and real-time collaboration features, makes Google Drive indispensable for businesses looking to streamline their document management processes. The gro

Diversity in Tech Statistics: In today's tech-driven world, discussions about diversity in the technology sector have gained significant traction. Recent statistics shed light on the disparities and opportunities within this industry. According to data from various sources, including reports from leading tech companies and diversity advocacy groups, the lack of diversity remains a prominent issue. For example, studies reveal that only 25% of computing jobs in the United States are held by women, while Black and Hispanic individuals make up just 9% of the tech workforce combined. Additionally, research indicates that LGBTQ+ individuals are underrepresented in tech, with only 2.3% of tech workers identifying as LGBTQ+. Despite these challenges, there are promising signs of progress. Companies are increasingly recognizing the importance of diversity and inclusion initiatives, with some allocating significant resources to address these issues. For instance, tech giants like Google and Microsoft have committed millions of USD to diversity programs aimed at recruiting and retaining underrepresented talent. As discussions surrounding diversity in tech continue to evolve, understanding the statistical landscape is crucial in fostering meaningful change and creating a more inclusive industry for all. Editor’s Choice In 2021, 7.9% of the US labor force was employed in technology. Women hold only 26.7% of tech employment, while men hold 73.3% of these positions. White Americans hold 62.5% of the positions in the US tech sector. Asian Americans account for 20% of jobs, Latinx Americans 8%, and Black Americans 7%. 83.3% of tech executives in the US are white. Black Americans comprised 14% of the population in 2019 but held only 7% of tech employment. For the same position, at the same business, and with the same experience, women in tech are typically paid 3% less than men. The high-tech sector employs more men (64% against 52%), Asian Americans (14% compared to 5.8%), and white people (68.5% versus 63.5%) compared to other industries. The tech industry is urged to prioritize inclusion when hiring, mentoring, and retaining employees to bridge the digital skills gap. Black professionals only account for 4% of all tech workers despite being 13% of the US workforce. Hispanic professionals hold just 8% of all STEM jobs despite being 17% of the national workforce. Only 22% of workers in tech are ethnic minorities. Gender diversity in tech is low, with just 26% of jobs in computer-related sectors occupied by women. Companies with diverse teams have higher profitability, with those in the top quartile for gender diversity being 25% more likely to have above-average profitability. Every month, the tech industry adds about 9,600 jobs to the U.S. economy. Between May 2009 and May 2015, over 800,000 net STEM jobs were added to the U.S. economy. STEM jobs are expected to grow by another 8.9% between 2015 and 2024. The percentage of black and Hispanic employees at major tech companies is very low, making up just one to three percent of the tech workforce. Tech hiring relies heavily on poaching and incentives, creating an unsustainable ecosystem ripe for disruption. Recruiters have a significant role in disrupting the hiring process to support diversity and inclusion. You May Also Like To Read Outsourcing Statistics Digital Transformation Statistics Internet of Things Statistics Computer Vision Statistics

The American Community Survey (ACS) is an ongoing survey that provides vital information on a yearly basis about our nation and its people by contacting over 3.5 million households across the country. The resulting data provides incredibly detailed demographic information across the US aggregated at various geographic levels which helps determine how more than $675 billion in federal and state funding are distributed each year. Businesses use ACS data to inform strategic decision-making. ACS data can be used as a component of market research, provide information about concentrations of potential employees with a specific education or occupation, and which communities could be good places to build offices or facilities. For example, someone scouting a new location for an assisted-living center might look for an area with a large proportion of seniors and a large proportion of people employed in nursing occupations. Through the ACS, we know more about jobs and occupations, educational attainment, veterans, whether people own or rent their homes, and other topics. Public officials, planners, and entrepreneurs use this information to assess the past and plan the future. For more information, see the Census Bureau's ACS Information Guide . This public dataset is hosted in Google BigQuery as part of the Google Cloud Public Datasets Program , with Carto providing cleaning and onboarding support. It is included in BigQuery's 1TB/mo of free tier processing. This means that each user receives 1TB of free BigQuery processing every month, which can be used to run queries on this public dataset. Watch this short video to learn how to get started quickly using BigQuery to access public datasets. What is BigQuery .

The size of the Workforce Analytics Industry market was valued at USD XX Million in 2023 and is projected to reach USD XXX Million by 2032, with an expected CAGR of 15.64% during the forecast period.Workforce analytics is the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data regarding an organization's workforce in order to make better decisions and optimize human capital. Advanced analytics techniques can be used by organizations to provide valuable insights into employee performance, engagement, productivity, and other key metrics.Workforce analytics helps the organization make fact-based decisions while acquiring, retaining, developing, and compensating talent. Then the patterns that could be applied to predict future workforce needs would help solve potential problems before they arise and optimize usage from historical data analysis. Workforce analytics further allows an organization to find potential talent, measure the ROI of training programs, and assess the effectiveness of the organizational change initiatives.Using the power of workforce analytics, organizations can make their workforce much more connected, productive, and effective in conducting businesses successfully. Recent developments include: September 2022: ActivTrak partnered with Google Workspace to provide personal work insights that enable employees to improve their digital work habits and wellness. Customers can embed individual work metrics into their Google Workspace applications with ActivTrak for Google Workspace, giving employees immediate visibility to help them redesign their workday, protect focus time, and improve well-being., August 2022: ADP has launched Intelligent Self-Service, which assists employees with common issues before they need to contact their HR department for assistance. Based on an analysis of data from across ADP's ecosystem, the product employs predictive analytics and machine learning to predict which issues may arise.. Key drivers for this market are: Increasing Need to Make a Smarter a Decision About the Talent, Increasing Data in HR Departments related to Pay rolls, Recruitment. Potential restraints include: Lack of Awareness About Workforce Analytics. Notable trends are: Performance Monitoring Offers Potential Growth.

Google Workspace Business Tool Market Outlook

The global Google Workspace business tool market size was valued at approximately USD 11 billion in 2023 and is projected to reach around USD 27.5 billion by 2032, exhibiting a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 10.7% during the forecast period. The growth of this market is fueled by the increasing demand for remote working solutions, enhanced collaboration tools, and the integration of artificial intelligence and machine learning capabilities within business tools.

The growth factors of the Google Workspace business tool market are multifaceted. One of the primary drivers is the growing trend of remote working and the need for seamless communication and collaboration tools. Companies worldwide are increasingly adopting remote working policies, necessitated by the COVID-19 pandemic, which has accelerated the adoption of versatile business tools that enable employees to work efficiently from any location. Google Workspace fits this need perfectly with its suite of integrated applications designed to enhance productivity and streamline workflows.

Another significant growth factor is the increasing emphasis on data security and compliance. As businesses become more digitized, the importance of securing sensitive information and adhering to regulatory standards has become paramount. Google Workspace offers robust security features, including encrypted emails, two-factor authentication, and compliance with various global data protection regulations, making it an attractive option for enterprises looking to safeguard their data against potential breaches and cyber threats.

The integration of AI and machine learning capabilities is also a substantial growth driver for the Google Workspace business tool market. Features such as smart email categorization, automated meeting scheduling, and intelligent data analytics are increasingly being favored by businesses to enhance operational efficiency and decision-making processes. These advanced functionalities not only save time but also provide valuable insights that can drive business growth and innovation.

Regionally, North America currently holds the largest market share, driven by the high adoption rate of digital tools and advanced technologies among enterprises. The region's well-established IT infrastructure and the presence of major tech companies like Google contribute to this dominance. However, the Asia Pacific region is expected to exhibit the highest growth rate during the forecast period, fueled by rapid digital transformation, increasing internet penetration, and the growing number of SMEs adopting cloud-based solutions.

Component Analysis

The Google Workspace business tool market can be segmented by component into software and services. The software segment comprises various productivity applications such as Gmail, Google Drive, Google Docs, Sheets, Slides, and more. These tools are designed to facilitate communication, collaboration, and productivity across different business functions. The demand for these software solutions is driven by their ease of use, seamless integration, and the ability to work on any device with internet connectivity. Additionally, continuous updates and new feature rollouts keep the software relevant and aligned with changing business needs.

The services segment includes support services, consulting, and managed services provided by Google and its partners. These services play a crucial role in ensuring that businesses can fully leverage the capabilities of Google Workspace. Support services help resolve technical issues and provide assistance with deployment and usage, ensuring minimal disruption to business operations. Consulting services offer expert advice on optimizing Google Workspace for specific business needs, while managed services handle the administration and maintenance of the tools, allowing businesses to focus on their core activities.

The software segment is expected to dominate the market due to the high demand for integrated productivity tools that facilitate remote working and collaboration. However, the services segment is also anticipated to grow significantly as businesses seek expert guidance and support to maximize the benefits of their Google Workspace investments. The increasing complexity of IT environments and the need for specialized skills to manage cloud-based solutions are key factors driving the growth of the services segment.

Moreover, as businesses continue to evolve and their needs become more sophisticated, the d

OpenCon 2015 Application Open Data

The purpose of this document is to accompany the public release of data collected from OpenCon 2015 applications.Download & Technical Information The data can be downloaded in CSV format from GitHub here: https://github.com/RightToResearch/OpenCon-2015-Application-Data The file uses UTF8 encoding, comma as field delimiter, quotation marks as text delimiter, and no byte order mark.

License and Requests

This data is released to the public for free and open use under a CC0 1.0 license. We have a couple of requests for anyone who uses the data. First, we’d love it if you would let us know what you are doing with it, and share back anything you develop with the OpenCon community (#opencon / @open_con ). Second, it would also be great if you would include a link to the OpenCon 2015 website (www.opencon2015.org) wherever the data is used. You are not obligated to do any of this, but we’d appreciate it!

Data Fields

Unique ID

This is a unique ID assigned to each applicant. Numbers were assigned using a random number generator.

Timestamp

This was the timestamp recorded by google forms. Timestamps are in EDT (Eastern U.S. Daylight Time). Note that the application process officially began at 1:00pm EDT June 1 ended at 6:00am EDT on June 23. Some applications have timestamps later than this date, and this is due to a variety of reasons including exceptions granted for technical difficulties, error corrections (which required re-submitting the form), and applications sent in via email and later entered manually into the form. [a]

Gender

Mandatory. Choose one from list or fill-in other. Options provided: Male, Female, Other (fill in).

Country of Nationality

Mandatory. Choose one option from list.

Country of Residence

Mandatory. Choose one option from list.

What is your primary occupation?

Mandatory. Choose one from list or fill-in other. Options provided: Undergraduate student; Masters/professional student; PhD candidate; Faculty/teacher; Researcher (non-faculty); Librarian; Publisher; Professional advocate; Civil servant / government employee; Journalist; Doctor / medical professional; Lawyer; Other (fill in).

Select the option below that best describes your field of study or expertise

Mandatory. Choose one option from list.

What is your primary area of interest within OpenCon’s program areas?

Mandatory. Choose one option from list. Note: for the first approximately 24 hours the options were listed in this order: Open Access, Open Education, Open Data. After that point, we set the form to randomize the order, and noticed an immediate shift in the distribution of responses.

Are you currently engaged in activities to advance Open Access, Open Education, and/or Open Data?

Mandatory. Choose one option from list.

Are you planning to participate in any of the following events this year?

Optional. Choose all that apply from list. Multiple selections separated by semi-colon.

Do you have any of the following skills or interests?

Mandatory. Choose all that apply from list or fill-in other. Multiple selections separated by semi-colon. Options provided: Coding; Website Management / Design; Graphic Design; Video Editing; Community / Grassroots Organizing; Social Media Campaigns; Fundraising; Communications and Media; Blogging; Advocacy and Policy; Event Logistics; Volunteer Management; Research about OpenCon's Issue Areas; Other (fill-in).

Data Collection & Cleaning

This data consists of information collected from people who applied to attend OpenCon 2015. In the application form, questions that would be released as Open Data were marked with a caret (^) and applicants were asked to acknowledge before submitting the form that they understood that their responses to these questions would be released as such. The questions we released were selected to avoid any potentially sensitive personal information, and to minimize the chances that any individual applicant can be positively identified. Applications were formally collected during a 22 day period beginning on June 1, 2015 at 13:00 EDT and ending on June 23 at 06:00 EDT. Some applications have timestamps later than this date, and this is due to a variety of reasons including exceptions granted for technical difficulties, error corrections (which required re-submitting the form), and applications sent in via email and later entered manually into the form. Applications were collected using a Google Form embedded at http://www.opencon2015.org/attend, and the shortened bit.ly link http://bit.ly/AppsAreOpen was promoted through social media. The primary work we did to clean the data focused on identifying and eliminating duplicates. We removed all duplicate applications that had matching e-mail addresses and first and last names. We also identified a handful of other duplicates that used different e-mail addresses but were otherwise identical. In cases where duplicate applications contained any different information, we kept the information from the version with the most recent timestamp. We made a few minor adjustments in the country field for cases where the entry was obviously an error (for example, electing a country listed alphabetically above or below the one indicated elsewhere in the application). We also removed one potentially offensive comment (which did not contain an answer to the question) from the Gender field and replaced it with “Other.”

About OpenCon

OpenCon 2015 is the student and early career academic professional conference on Open Access, Open Education, and Open Data and will be held on November 14-16, 2015 in Brussels, Belgium. It is organized by the Right to Research Coalition, SPARC (The Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition), and an Organizing Committee of students and early career researchers from around the world. The meeting will convene students and early career academic professionals from around the world and serve as a powerful catalyst for projects led by the next generation to advance OpenCon's three focus areas—Open Access, Open Education, and Open Data. A unique aspect of OpenCon is that attendance at the conference is by application only, and the majority of participants who apply are awarded travel scholarships to attend. This model creates a unique conference environment where the most dedicated and impactful advocates can attend, regardless of where in the world they live or their access to travel funding. The purpose of the application process is to conduct these selections fairly. This year we were overwhelmed by the quantity and quality of applications received, and we hope that by sharing this data, we can better understand the OpenCon community and the state of student and early career participation in the Open Access, Open Education, and Open Data movements.

Questions

For inquires about the OpenCon 2015 Application data, please contact Nicole Allen at nicole@sparc.arl.org.

"ImageNet is an image database organized according to the WordNet hierarchy (currently only the nouns), in which each node of the hierarchy is depicted by hundreds and thousands of images. The project has been instrumental in advancing computer vision and deep learning research. The data is available for free to researchers for non-commercial use." (https://www.image-net.org/index.php)

I do not hold any copyright to this dataset. This data is just a re-distribution of the data Imagenet.org shared on Kaggle. Please note that some of the ImageNet1K images are under copyright.

This version of the data is directly sourced from Kaggle, excluding the bounding box annotations. Therefore, only images and class labels are included.

All images are resized to 256 x 256.

Integer labels are assigned after ordering the class names alphabetically.

Please note that anyone using this data abides by the original terms: ``` RESEARCHER_FULLNAME has requested permission to use the ImageNet database (the "Database") at Princeton University and Stanford University. In exchange for such permission, Researcher hereby agrees to the following terms and conditions:

1. Researcher shall use the Database only for non-commercial research and educational purposes.
2. Princeton University and Stanford University make no representations or warranties regarding the Database, including but not limited to warranties of non-infringement or fitness for a particular purpose.
3. Researcher accepts full responsibility for his or her use of the Database and shall defend and indemnify the ImageNet team, Princeton University, and Stanford University, including their employees, Trustees, officers and agents, against any and all claims arising from Researcher's use of the Database, including but not limited to Researcher's use of any copies of copyrighted images that he or she may create from the Database.
4. Researcher may provide research associates and colleagues with access to the Database provided that they first agree to be bound by these terms and conditions.
5. Princeton University and Stanford University reserve the right to terminate Researcher's access to the Database at any time.
6. If Researcher is employed by a for-profit, commercial entity, Researcher's employer shall also be bound by these terms and conditions, and Researcher hereby represents that he or she is fully authorized to enter into this agreement on behalf of such employer.
7. The law of the State of New Jersey shall apply to all disputes under this agreement.

The images are processed using [TPU VM](https://cloud.google.com/tpu/docs/users-guide-tpu-vm) via the support of Google's [TPU Research Cloud](https://sites.research.google/trc/about/).