Access our extensive Facebook datasets that provide detailed information on public posts, pages, and user engagement. Gain insights into post performance, audience interactions, page details, and content trends with our ethically sourced data. Free samples are available for evaluation. Over 940M records available Price starts at $250/100K records Data formats are available in JSON, NDJSON, CSV, XLSX and Parquet. 100% ethical and compliant data collection Included datapoints:

Post ID Post Content & URL Date Posted Hashtags Number of Comments Number of Shares Likes & Reaction Counts (by type) Video View Count Page Name & Category Page Followers & Likes Page Verification Status Page Website & Contact Info Is Sponsored Post Attachments (Images/Videos) External Link Data And much more

171 million names (100 million unique) This torrent contains: The URL of every searchable Facebook user s profile The name of every searchable Facebook user, both unique and by count (perfect for post-processing, datamining, etc) Processed lists, including first names with count, last names with count, potential usernames with count, etc The programs I used to generate everything So, there you have it: lots of awesome data from Facebook. Now, I just have to find one more problem with Facebook so I can write "Revenge of the Facebook Snatchers" and complete the trilogy. Any suggestions? >:-) Limitations So far, I have only indexed the searchable users, not their friends. Getting their friends will be significantly more data to process, and I don t have those capabilities right now. I d like to tackle that in the future, though, so if anybody has any bandwidth they d like to donate, all I need is an ssh account and Nmap installed. An additional limitation is that these are on

Facebook probably needs no introduction; nonetheless, here is a quick history of the company. The world’s biggest and most-famous social network was launched by Mark Zuckerberg while he was a...

Facebook is fast approaching 3 billion monthly active users. That’s about 36% of the world’s entire population that log in and use Facebook at least once a month.

All data required to reproduce results of "How much research shared on Facebook is hidden from public view?". More information about the manuscript, code, and reproducibility can be found here. This dataset contains five spreadsheets from two different sources: 1. Data collected with our own method described in Enkhbayar and Alperin (2018). More details and instructions can be found in this GitHub repository. plos_one_articles.csv: All articles published in PLOS ONE from 2015 - 2017 altmetric_counts.csv: POS and TW counts retrieved from Altmetric™ graph_api_counts.csv: AES counts collected with our methods using Facebook's Graph API query_details.csv: Responses from Graph API 2. Data provided by Piwowar et al. (2017) PLOS_2015-2017_idArt-DOI-PY-Journal-Title-LargerDiscipline-Discipline-Specialty.csv: Disciplinary categorisations for PLOS ONE publications as described in Piwowar et al. (2015) References Enkhbayar, A., & Alperin, J. P. (2018). Challenges of capturing engagement on Facebook for Altmetrics. STI 2018 Conference Proceedings, 1460–1469. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1809.01194 Piwowar, H., Priem, J., Larivière, V., Alperin, J. P., Matthias, L., Norlander, B., … Haustein, S. (2018). The state of OA: A large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles. PeerJ, 6, e4375. doi: 10/ckh5

In the second half of 2024, Facebook received approximately 324,000 law enforcement agency requests for user information. Overall, the social network produced some user data for nearly 77 percent of requests.

This dataset is about book series. It has 1 row and is filtered where the books is Facebook marketing all-in-one for dummies. It features 10 columns including number of authors, number of books, earliest publication date, and latest publication date.

The number of Facebook users in the United States was forecast to continuously increase between 2024 and 2028 by in total **** million users (+**** percent). After the ninth consecutive increasing year, the Facebook user base is estimated to reach ***** million users and therefore a new peak in 2028. Notably, the number of Facebook users of was continuously increasing over the past years.User figures, shown here regarding the platform facebook, have been estimated by taking into account company filings or press material, secondary research, app downloads and traffic data. They refer to the average monthly active users over the period and count multiple accounts by persons only once.The shown data are an excerpt of Statista's Key Market Indicators (KMI). The KMI are a collection of primary and secondary indicators on the macro-economic, demographic and technological environment in up to *** countries and regions worldwide. All indicators are sourced from international and national statistical offices, trade associations and the trade press and they are processed to generate comparable data sets (see supplementary notes under details for more information).

Facebook uses an anonymized snapshot of all active Facebook users and their friendship networks to measure the intensity of connectedness between locations. The Social Connectedness Index (SCI) is a measure of the social connectedness between different geographies. Specifically, it measures the relative probability that two individuals across two locations are friends with each other on Facebook. Region identifiers are taken from GADM v2.8 https://gadm.org/download_country_v2.html.

This fileset contains a series of screenshots taken from our facebook advertising account. A few days ago we noticed that some negative "SEO" tactics, for lack of a better term, were having a negative impact on the performance of ads and fan engagement on the facebook page that we've been building.

I developed a custom software package, which utilizes nueural networks I've developed, to identify a target demographic, and suggest advertising content for said target demographic.

After a short training period we were able to create advertisemsents on facebook that averaged a cost of 0.01 cents per like. We also had a fan page engagement of nearly 4 times that of major brands like Wal-Mart.

Shortly after we began to obtain success we started noticing problems with our page. Since we have a stalker issue, we determined that the issues with our page were likely related to him.

We assued this because we had a disproportinately high number of spammy, negative, and inapporpriate comments on our posts. Offline harassment of our staff by the stalker also increased significantly during this time.

Curiously, we believe that the incident with the stalker allowed us to ascertain some interesting observations about Facebook's algorithims, which I've outlined below.

We believe, after reseraching this issue, that Facebook's algorithims suffer from the following issues:

1. They are easily gamed. We think that Facebook's algorithims are hypersensitive to negative comments being made on a post, and conversely likely positive ones as well. If a post is hidden, the comments are negative, or if a user interacts with the post negatively in some way, then Facebook's algorithims will "punish" your page.

2. We think that a series of scripted fake bot accounts would easily cause the issues that we've been expriencing.

As you can see from the data provided, over 90% of our likes come from paid facebook advertisement, therefore we do not have a significant number of fake accounts on our page brought in by third party advertising because we didn't do any of that.

Moreover, we did not send any of our fans obtained via mailing lists, or offline contact to our facebook page, those fans participate with us via email and/or through our private Google+ community.

So it is safe to say that our problems have not been caused by purchasing a large amount of fake likes from any third party vendor.

In addition, because our likes were gained very quickly, at a rate of about 2.5k likes a day, we do not believe that we have suffered from changes in the general demographic of our Facebook fan base over time.

Yet almost immediately after we started expericing trolling issues with our page, we also noticed a dip in the number of fans our posts were shown to by Facebook, and the performance of our ads began to go down, even though the content on our page had not changed.

We attributed this to holes in Facebook's algorithims, and potentially to the excessive use of fake bot accounts by Facebook itself.

We cannot prove the latter satement, but there have been similar reports before. Reference - http://www.forbes.com/sites/davidthier/2012/08/01/facebook-investigating-claims-that-80-of-ad-clicks-come-from-bots/

This article from Forbes outlines how one startup company repoted that up to 80% of their Facebook likes were fake bot accounts even though they paid for advertising directly through Facebook.

Our reserach suggests that Facebook's advertising platform functions as follows: - An advertiser pays for likes with Facebook, and the quality of the content on their page is initially assessed by those who are liking the page, but once the page obtains a following, we believe that the quality of the content is assessed by how many people like the posts on the page directly after they are posted.

If a post gets hidden, marked as spammed, skipped over, whatever, then we beleive that Facebook kicks that post out of the newsfeeds. If this happens to a significant number of posts on the page, then we believe that Facebook places the page on an advertising black-list.

Once on this black-list ads will begin to perform poorly, and content will drop out of newsfeeds causing even the most active page to go silent.

We tested this by posting pictures of attractive blond women, which with our demographic would have normally obtained a large number of likes and we struggled to get even 10 likes at over 20k page likes when we would have previosuly obtained almost 100 likes without boosting at only 5k page likes.

Why this probably isn't seen more often: In most cases this probably takes a while to occur as pages become old and fans grow bored, but in our case, because we have a stalker trolling our page with what appears to be hundres of scripted bot accounts, the effect was seen immediately.

Our data suggests that it became a tug of war between our stalker's army of fake bot accounts (making spammy comments, hiding our posts from newsfeeds, etc) and the real fans that actually like our page (who were voting our conent up - i.e. liking it, etc).

If you look at the graph of page likes in the figures provided - you can see that the darker purple are the fans we obtained via facebook advertising, well over 90%. We believe that the light purple (the "organic" fans) is mostly comprised of our stalker's fake drone accounts. We have less than 20 family members and friends liking our page, when we began this experiment we asked them not to interact with our page or the content.

In conclusion: We still have a lot more work to do, but it is highly likely that many Facebook likes are either scripted bots, and/or that Facebook's "weighting" algorithims are very suceptible to gaming via negative "SEO" tactics. Conversely, they are likely sensitive to gaming via positive "SEO" tactics as well.

Of course we cannot say for certain where the Facebook accounts that like a page come from without acess to their internal systems, but the evidence does strongly suggest that Facebook might be plagued with a large quantity of bot accounts, and that their algorithim has to be sensitive to actions from live users, so that the quality of the content can be easily ascertained. Otherwise it would be pretty easy for an advertiser to game Facebook's system by paying for, and getting, a large quantity of likes for content that is not appealing to any significant group of people.

Again we have to reiterate that we have no solid proof of this, but our data strongly suggests that this is the case.

We have reported the issues to Facebook, but interestingly, after we made it clear that we were going to analyze and investigate the issues with our page, we have been suddenly and incessently plagued with a never ending stream of "technical difficulties" related to our advertising account.

If you'd like to collaborate on this project, please feel free to email me at Jamie@ITSmoleculardesign.com.

OverviewThe BuzzFeed dataset, officially known as the BuzzFeed-Webis Fake News Corpus 2016, comprises content from 9 news publishers over a 7-day period close to the 2016 US election. It was created to analyze the spread of misinformation and hyperpartisan content on social media platforms, particularly Facebook.Dataset CompositionNews Articles: The dataset includes 1,627 articles from various sources:826 from mainstream publishers256 from left-wing publishers545 from right-wing publishersFacebook Posts: Each article is associated with Facebook post data, including metrics like share counts, reaction counts, and comment counts.Comments: The dataset includes nearly 1.7 million Facebook comments discussing the news content.Fact-Check Ratings: Each article was fact-checked by professional journalists at BuzzFeed, providing veracity assessments.Key FeaturesPublisher Information: The dataset covers 9 publishers, including 6 hyperpartisan (3 left-wing and 3 right-wing) and 3 mainstream outlets.Temporal Aspect: The data was collected over seven weekdays (September 19-23 and September 26-27, 2016).Verification Status: All publishers included in the dataset had earned Facebook's blue checkmark, indicating authenticity and elevated status.Metadata: Includes various metrics such as publication dates, post types, and engagement statistics.Potential ApplicationsThe BuzzFeed dataset is valuable for various research and analytical purposes:News Veracity Assessment: Researchers can use machine learning techniques to classify articles based on their factual accuracy.Social Media Analysis: The dataset allows for studying how news spreads on platforms like Facebook, including engagement patterns.Hyperpartisan Content Study: It enables analysis of differences between mainstream and hyperpartisan news sources.Content Strategy Optimization: Media companies can use insights from the dataset to refine their content strategies.Audience Analysis: The data can be used for demographic analysis and audience segmentation.This dataset provides a comprehensive snapshot of news dissemination and engagement on social media during a crucial period, making it a valuable resource for researchers, data scientists, and media analysts studying online information ecosystems.

In the first half of 2024, Facebook received over 99,000 user data requests from law enforcement agencies of India. The United States ranked second, with over 81,000 user data requests, followed by Brazil, with nearly 26,000 requests. During the measured period, a total of 324,000 requests were submitted to the social network.

Facebook is the leading social network worldwide, and its accessibility through multiple mobile apps as well as its mobile website. In January 2021, over 98 percent of active user accounts worldwide accessed the social network via any kind of mobile phone.

Facebook in mobile-first markets India is thecountry with the largest Facebook audience by far, with 340 million users on the platform, followed the United States, Indonesia, and Brazil all of which have more than 100 million Facebook users each. With the exception of the United States, all of these are digital markets with mobile-first audiences. In many emerging markets, mobile is often the first online experience, providing online users with their first internet experience through inexpensive smartphones and mobile data contracts. In India and Indonesia, mobile by far surpasses desktop in terms of audiences and time spent.

Mobile Facebook access Due to the social network’s wide reach on mobile, it is unsurprising that Facebook consistently ranks as one of the most-downloaded app publishers worldwide. Some of the apps published by Facebook include the eponymous social networking app (and its low-bandwidth version, Facebook Lite), Facebook Messenger (also available as Messenger Lite), Facebook Pages Manager and Facebook Local. In the Google Play Store, Facebook Messenger, Messenger Lite and Facebook frequently rank among the top downloaded apps every month.

Meta Platforms Stock Prices (Oct 28, 2021 - May 7, 2024)

This dataset contains daily stock price data for Meta Platforms (formerly Facebook) from October 28, 2021, to May 7, 2024. The data was collected from Yahoo Finance

Columns:

• Date: Date (DD/MM/YYYY)
• Open: The opening price of the stock on that day
• High: The highest price of the stock on that day
• Low: The lowest price of the stock on that day
• Close: The closing price of the stock on that day
• Adj Close: Adjusted closing price of the stock on that day (adjusted for stock splits)
• Volume: Number of shares traded on that day

Using the CrowdTangle API, each of the pink slime news domains was input and searched for public Facebook Page and Group posts from 2019-2024. Since the maximum number of posts possible to return is 1,000, I created a recursive function to halve the timeframe until fewer than 1,000 posts were available and then add in the posts from all the remaining time frames. Each row is a different post from a public Facebook Page or Group linking to a known pink slime website.Ads were collected via facebook.com/ads/library using the United States location and “Issues, elections or politics” ad category. Each of the ad purchasers listed above was a separate keyword that generated its own csv via the ad library. These csv's were then uploaded into a Python dataframe and concatenated into a single dataframe. Each row represents a different ad that ran on Meta's platforms and was paid for by a pink slime news parent organization.

Gain valuable insights with our comprehensive Social Media Dataset, designed to help businesses, marketers, and analysts track trends, monitor engagement, and optimize strategies. This dataset provides structured and reliable social media data from multiple platforms.

Dataset Features

User Profiles: Access public social media profiles, including usernames, bios, follower counts, engagement metrics, and more. Ideal for audience analysis, influencer marketing, and competitive research. Posts & Content: Extract posts, captions, hashtags, media (images/videos), timestamps, and engagement metrics such as likes, shares, and comments. Useful for trend analysis, sentiment tracking, and content strategy optimization. Comments & Interactions: Analyze user interactions, including replies, mentions, and discussions. This data helps brands understand audience sentiment and engagement patterns. Hashtag & Trend Tracking: Monitor trending hashtags, topics, and viral content across platforms to stay ahead of industry trends and consumer interests.

Customizable Subsets for Specific Needs Our Social Media Dataset is fully customizable, allowing you to filter data based on platform, region, keywords, engagement levels, or specific user profiles. Whether you need a broad dataset for market research or a focused subset for brand monitoring, we tailor the dataset to your needs.

Popular Use Cases

Brand Monitoring & Reputation Management: Track brand mentions, customer feedback, and sentiment analysis to manage online reputation effectively. Influencer Marketing & Audience Analysis: Identify key influencers, analyze engagement metrics, and optimize influencer partnerships. Competitive Intelligence: Monitor competitor activity, content performance, and audience engagement to refine marketing strategies. Market Research & Consumer Insights: Analyze social media trends, customer preferences, and emerging topics to inform business decisions. AI & Predictive Analytics: Leverage structured social media data for AI-driven trend forecasting, sentiment analysis, and automated content recommendations.

Whether you're tracking brand sentiment, analyzing audience engagement, or monitoring industry trends, our Social Media Dataset provides the structured data you need. Get started today and customize your dataset to fit your business objectives.

Analysis of ‘Facebook Ad Campaign’ provided by Analyst-2 (analyst-2.ai), based on source dataset retrieved from https://www.kaggle.com/madislemsalu/facebook-ad-campaign on 28 January 2022.

--- Dataset description provided by original source is as follows ---

Simple Dataset from different marketing campaigns.

The total conversion number shows the total number of signups or installs for instance while approved conversions tells how many became actual active users.

Courtesy of Bunq.

--- Original source retains full ownership of the source dataset ---

In this research note we document changes to rate of comments, shares, and reactions on local Republican Facebook pages. Near the end of 2018, local Republican parties started to see a much higher degree of interactions on their posts compared to Democratic parties. We show how this increase in engagement was unique to Facebook and happened across a range of over a thousand local parties. In addition, we use a changepoint model to identify when the change happened and find it lines up with reported information about the change in Facebook’s algorithm in 2018. We conclude that it seems possible that changes in how Facebook rated content led to a doubling of the total shares of Republican party posts compared to Democratic party posts in the first half of 2019 even though Democratic parties posted more often during this period. Regardless of Facebook’s motivations, their decision to change the algorithm might have given local Republican parties greater reach to connect with citizens and shape political realities for Americans. The fact that private companies can so easily control the political information flow for millions of Americans raises clear questions for the state of democracy.

These data files include replication data for Corrigan, Alhabash, Rousu and Cash (2018), "How much is social media worth? Estimating the value of Facebook by paying users to stop using it," PLOS One (forthcoming). The first file contains replication data for Auction 1, collected at Kenyon College, with each respondent having three separate rows (one observation for each bidding condition described in the paper). This file is provided in .xlsx format. The second file contains replication data for Auctions 2 and 3, collected at Michigan State University, with the "DatasetID" identifier indicating the recruitment mechanism described in the paper (student vs. community/paid pools in Auction 2, or the Mturk sample that participated in Auction 3). This format is provided in Stata 14 .dta format.

Context

Facebook is a company that literally every kid is aware of. Its a household name. People from various age groups are there on this social media website. It has helped many in connecting with different people and also has helped some of the investors by earning them a good amount of money. This data set contains the details of the stock of Facebook Inc.

Content

This data set has 7 columns with all the necessary values such as opening price of the stock, the closing price of it, its highest in the day and much more. It has date wise data of the stock starting from 2012 to 2020(August).