Starts and completions of new build dwellings in the UK, on a quarterly and annual basis, time series data

Housing Starts in the United States decreased to 1307 Thousand units in August from 1429 Thousand units in July of 2025. This dataset provides the latest reported value for - United States Housing Starts - plus previous releases, historical high and low, short-term forecast and long-term prediction, economic calendar, survey consensus and news.

House Price Prediction Dataset.

The dataset contains 2000 rows of house-related data, representing various features that could influence house prices. Below, we discuss key aspects of the dataset, which include its structure, the choice of features, and potential use cases for analysis.

1. Dataset Features

The dataset is designed to capture essential attributes for predicting house prices, including:

Area: Square footage of the house, which is generally one of the most important predictors of price. Bedrooms & Bathrooms: The number of rooms in a house significantly affects its value. Homes with more rooms tend to be priced higher. Floors: The number of floors in a house could indicate a larger, more luxurious home, potentially raising its price. Year Built: The age of the house can affect its condition and value. Newly built houses are generally more expensive than older ones. Location: Houses in desirable locations such as downtown or urban areas tend to be priced higher than those in suburban or rural areas. Condition: The current condition of the house is critical, as well-maintained houses (in 'Excellent' or 'Good' condition) will attract higher prices compared to houses in 'Fair' or 'Poor' condition. Garage: Availability of a garage can increase the price due to added convenience and space. Price: The target variable, representing the sale price of the house, used to train machine learning models to predict house prices based on the other features.

2. Feature Distributions

Area Distribution: The area of the houses in the dataset ranges from 500 to 5000 square feet, which allows analysis across different types of homes, from smaller apartments to larger luxury houses. Bedrooms and Bathrooms: The number of bedrooms varies from 1 to 5, and bathrooms from 1 to 4. This variance enables analysis of homes with different sizes and layouts. Floors: Houses in the dataset have between 1 and 3 floors. This feature could be useful for identifying the influence of multi-level homes on house prices. Year Built: The dataset contains houses built from 1900 to 2023, giving a wide range of house ages to analyze the effects of new vs. older construction. Location: There is a mix of urban, suburban, downtown, and rural locations. Urban and downtown homes may command higher prices due to proximity to amenities. Condition: Houses are labeled as 'Excellent', 'Good', 'Fair', or 'Poor'. This feature helps model the price differences based on the current state of the house. Price Distribution: Prices range between $50,000 and $1,000,000, offering a broad spectrum of property values. This range makes the dataset appropriate for predicting a wide variety of housing prices, from affordable homes to luxury properties.

3. Correlation Between Features

A key area of interest is the relationship between various features and house price: Area and Price: Typically, a strong positive correlation is expected between the size of the house (Area) and its price. Larger homes are likely to be more expensive. Location and Price: Location is another major factor. Houses in urban or downtown areas may show a higher price on average compared to suburban and rural locations. Condition and Price: The condition of the house should show a positive correlation with price. Houses in better condition should be priced higher, as they require less maintenance and repair. Year Built and Price: Newer houses might command a higher price due to better construction standards, modern amenities, and less wear-and-tear, but some older homes in good condition may retain historical value. Garage and Price: A house with a garage may be more expensive than one without, as it provides extra storage or parking space.

4. Potential Use Cases

The dataset is well-suited for various machine learning and data analysis applications, including:

House Price Prediction: Using regression techniques, this dataset can be used to build a model to predict house prices based on the available features. Feature Importance Analysis: By using techniques such as feature importance ranking, data scientists can determine which features (e.g., location, area, or condition) have the greatest impact on house prices. Clustering: Clustering techniques like k-means could help identify patterns in the data, such as grouping houses into segments based on their characteristics (e.g., luxury homes, affordable homes). Market Segmentation: The dataset can be used to perform segmentation by location, price range, or house type to analyze trends in specific sub-markets, like luxury vs. affordable housing. Time-Based Analysis: By studying how house prices vary with the year built or the age of the house, analysts can derive insights into the trends of older vs. newer homes.

5. Limitations and ...

New Home Sales in the United States increased to 800 Thousand units in August from 664 Thousand units in July of 2025. This dataset provides the latest reported value for - United States New Home Sales - plus previous releases, historical high and low, short-term forecast and long-term prediction, economic calendar, survey consensus and news.

The exercise after this contains questions that are based on the housing dataset.

1. How many houses have a waterfront? a. 21000 b. 21450 c. 163 d. 173

2. How many houses have 2 floors? a. 2692 b. 8241 c. 10680 d. 161

3. How many houses built before 1960 have a waterfront? a. 80 b. 7309 c. 90 d. 92

4. What is the price of the most expensive house having more than 4 bathrooms? a. 7700000 b. 187000 c. 290000 d. 399000

5. For instance, if the ‘price’ column consists of outliers, how can you make the data clean and remove the redundancies? a. Calculate the IQR range and drop the values outside the range. b. Calculate the p-value and remove the values less than 0.05. c. Calculate the correlation coefficient of the price column and remove the values less than the correlation coefficient. d. Calculate the Z-score of the price column and remove the values less than the z-score.

6. What are the various parameters that can be used to determine the dependent variables in the housing data to determine the price of the house? a. Correlation coefficients b. Z-score c. IQR Range d. Range of the Features

7. If we get the r2 score as 0.38, what inferences can we make about the model and its efficiency? a. The model is 38% accurate, and shows poor efficiency. b. The model is showing 0.38% discrepancies in the outcomes. c. Low difference between observed and fitted values. d. High difference between observed and fitted values.

8. If the metrics show that the p-value for the grade column is 0.092, what all inferences can we make about the grade column? a. Significant in presence of other variables. b. Highly significant in presence of other variables c. insignificance in presence of other variables d. None of the above

9. If the Variance Inflation Factor value for a feature is considerably higher than the other features, what can we say about that column/feature? a. High multicollinearity b. Low multicollinearity c. Both A and B d. None of the above

https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Masterx-AI/Project_Housing_Price_Prediction_/main/hs.jpg" alt="">

Description:

A simple yet challenging project, to predict the housing price based on certain factors like house area, bedrooms, furnished, nearness to mainroad, etc. The dataset is small yet, it's complexity arises due to the fact that it has strong multicollinearity. Can you overcome these obstacles & build a decent predictive model?

Acknowledgement:

Harrison, D. and Rubinfeld, D.L. (1978) Hedonic prices and the demand for clean air. J. Environ. Economics and Management 5, 81–102. Belsley D.A., Kuh, E. and Welsch, R.E. (1980) Regression Diagnostics. Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity. New York: Wiley.

Objective:

• Understand the Dataset & cleanup (if required).
• Build Regression models to predict the sales w.r.t a single & multiple feature.
• Also evaluate the models & compare thier respective scores like R2, RMSE, etc.

This dataset provides values for HOUSING STARTS reported in several countries. The data includes current values, previous releases, historical highs and record lows, release frequency, reported unit and currency.

Total Housing Inventory in the United States decreased to 1520 Thousands in October from 1530 Thousands in September of 2025. This dataset includes a chart with historical data for the United States Total Housing Inventory.

A Home for Everyone is the City of Boise’s (city) initiative to address needs in the community by supporting the development and preservation of housing affordable to residents on Boise budgets. A Home for Everyone has three core goals: produce new homes affordable at 60% of area median income, create permanent supportive housing for households experiencing homelessness, and preserve home affordable at 80% of area median income. This dataset includes information about all homes that count toward the city’s Home for Everyone goals.

While the “produce affordable housing” and “create permanent supportive housing” goals are focused on supporting the development of new housing, the preservation goal is focused on maintaining existing housing affordable. As a result, many of the data fields related to new development are not relevant to preservation projects. For example, zoning incentives are only applicable to new construction projects.

Data may be unavailable for some projects and details are subject to change until construction is complete. Addresses are excluded for projects with fewer than five homes for privacy reasons.

The dataset includes details on the number of “homes”. We use the word "home" to refer to any single unit of housing regardless of size, type, or whether it is rented or owned. For example, a building with 40 apartments counts as 40 homes, and a single detached house counts as one home.

The dataset includes details about the phase of each project when a project involves constructing new housing. The process for building a new development is as follows: First, one must receive approval from the city’s Planning Division, which is also known as being “entitled.” Next, one must apply for and receive a permit from the city’s Building Division before beginning construction. Finally, once construction is complete and all city inspections have been passed, the building can be occupied.

To contribute to a city goal, homes must meet affordability requirements based on a standard called area median income. The city considers housing affordable if is targeted to households earning at or below 80% of the area median income. For a three-person household in Boise, that equates to an annual income of $60,650 and monthly housing cost of $1,516. Deeply affordable housing sets the income limit at 60% of area median income, or even 30% of area median income. See Boise Income Guidelines for more details.Project Name – The name of each project. If a row is related to the Home Improvement Loan program, that row aggregates data for all homes that received a loan in that quarter or year. Primary Address – The primary address for the development. Some developments encompass multiple addresses.Project Address(es) – Includes all addresses that are included as part of the development project.Parcel Number(s) – The identification code for all parcels of land included in the development.Acreage – The number of acres for the parcel(s) included in the project.Planning Permit Number – The identification code for all permits the development has received from the Planning Division for the City of Boise. The number and types of permits required vary based on the location and type of development.Date Entitled – The date a development was approved by the City’s Planning Division.Building Permit Number – The identification code for all permits the development has received from the city’s Building Division.Date Building Permit Issued – Building permits are required to begin construction on a development.Date Final Certificate of Occupancy Issued – A certificate of occupancy is the final approval by the city for a development, once construction is complete. Not all developments require a certificate of occupancy.Studio – The number of homes in the development that are classified as a studio. A studio is typically defined as a home in which there is no separate bedroom. A single room serves as both a bedroom and a living room.1-Bedroom – The number of homes in a development that have exactly one bedroom.2-Bedroom – The number of homes in a development that have exactly two bedrooms.3-Bedroom – The number of homes in a development that have exactly three bedrooms.4+ Bedroom – The number of homes in a development that have four or more bedrooms.# of Total Project Units – The total number of homes in the development.# of units toward goals – The number of homes in a development that contribute to either the city’s goal to produce housing affordable at or under 60% of area median income, or the city’s goal to create permanent supportive housing for households experiencing homelessness. Rent at or under 60% AMI - The number of homes in a development that are required to be rented at or below 60% of area median income. See the description of the dataset above for an explanation of area median income or see Boise Income Guidelines for more details. Boise defines a home as “affordable” if it is rented or sold at or below 80% of area median income.Rent 61-80% AMI – The number of homes in a development that are required to be rented at between 61% and 80% of area median income. See the description of the dataset above for an explanation of area median income or see Boise Income Guidelines for more details. Boise defines a home as “affordable” if it is rented or sold at or below 80% of area median income.Rent 81-120% AMI - The number of homes in a development that are required to be rented at between 81% and 120% of area median income. See the description of the dataset above for an explanation of area median income or see Boise Income Guidelines for more details.Own at or under 60% AMI - The number of homes in a development that are required to be sold at or below 60% of area median income. See the description of the dataset above for an explanation of area median income or see Boise Income Guidelines for more details. Boise defines a home as “affordable” if it is rented or sold at or below 80% of area median income.

Existing Home Sales in the United States increased to 4100 Thousand in October from 4050 Thousand in September of 2025. This dataset provides the latest reported value for - United States Existing Home Sales - plus previous releases, historical high and low, short-term forecast and long-term prediction, economic calendar, survey consensus and news.

Home Value Insights: A Beginner's Regression Dataset

This dataset is designed for beginners to practice regression problems, particularly in the context of predicting house prices. It contains 1000 rows, with each row representing a house and various attributes that influence its price. The dataset is well-suited for learning basic to intermediate-level regression modeling techniques.

Features:

1. Square_Footage: The size of the house in square feet. Larger homes typically have higher prices.
2. Num_Bedrooms: The number of bedrooms in the house. More bedrooms generally increase the value of a home.
3. Num_Bathrooms: The number of bathrooms in the house. Houses with more bathrooms are typically priced higher.
4. Year_Built: The year the house was built. Older houses may be priced lower due to wear and tear.
5. Lot_Size: The size of the lot the house is built on, measured in acres. Larger lots tend to add value to a property.
6. Garage_Size: The number of cars that can fit in the garage. Houses with larger garages are usually more expensive.
7. Neighborhood_Quality: A rating of the neighborhood’s quality on a scale of 1-10, where 10 indicates a high-quality neighborhood. Better neighborhoods usually command higher prices.
8. House_Price (Target Variable): The price of the house, which is the dependent variable you aim to predict.

Potential Uses:

1. Beginner Regression Projects: This dataset can be used to practice building regression models such as Linear Regression, Decision Trees, or Random Forests. The target variable (house price) is continuous, making this an ideal problem for supervised learning techniques.

2. Feature Engineering Practice: Learners can create new features by combining existing ones, such as the price per square foot or age of the house, providing an opportunity to experiment with feature transformations.

3. Exploratory Data Analysis (EDA): You can explore how different features (e.g., square footage, number of bedrooms) correlate with the target variable, making it a great dataset for learning about data visualization and summary statistics.

4. Model Evaluation: The dataset allows for various model evaluation techniques such as cross-validation, R-squared, and Mean Absolute Error (MAE). These metrics can be used to compare the effectiveness of different models.

Versatility:

• The dataset is highly versatile for a range of machine learning tasks. You can apply simple linear models to predict house prices based on one or two features, or use more complex models like Random Forest or Gradient Boosting Machines to understand interactions between variables.

• It can also be used for dimensionality reduction techniques like PCA or to practice handling categorical variables (e.g., neighborhood quality) through encoding techniques like one-hot encoding.

• This dataset is ideal for anyone wanting to gain practical experience in building regression models while working with real-world features.

Hello my fellow data enthusiasts! I'm back!

My journey into the world of real estate data has been nothing short of exciting, and I’m thrilled to share the fruits of that adventure with you all. After spending a few weeks tinkering with APIs, parsing responses, and structuring data into something meaningful, I'm excited to present the CLEANEST Zillow Dataset you've every seen!

Analysts will be able to get actionable insights and a structured view into the fascinating world of property data.

Here’s the story behind the dataset: Zillow’s data provides a treasure trove of information, but raw responses can be messy with nested structures, and scattered details. So, I rolled up my sleeves and built a robust pipeline to extract key data points from each response. From property details to price history, every piece of information was carefully categorized and mapped into logical fields. My goal was to create a dataset that feels as polished and user-friendly as the apps we rely on daily.

What Makes This Dataset Special?

• Structured & Clean Data: Every property in the dataset has been meticulously processed, cleaned, and formatted to make analysis seamless.
• Comprehensive Coverage: Whether you're analyzing trends in property values or studying features that drive price differences, this dataset has you covered.
• Accessible Layout: Tables are structured logically, with relationships that make sense for analysts at every level. This dataset is more than just numbers – it’s a toolkit for anyone looking to dive into real estate analysis, build predictive models, or simply explore trends in the housing market.

If you have any questions, feedback, or just want to geek out about data, don’t hesitate to connect with me on LinkedIn or here on Kaggle. Let’s build something awesome together!

NOTES: I use Google's Cloud Composer to request this data and due to costs, I'm only grabbing data for properties that were recently put up for sale or sold within the day of execution. If you're looking for historical data, please reach out!

Disclaimer: This dataset is intended for non-commercial, academic purposes and does not infringe upon Zillow's intellectual property rights. For full details on Zillow's terms, please visit Zillow's Terms of Use.

Dive in, explore, and let me know what you think. Happy analyzing!

Other Datasets: - Spotify

Home inspection dataset for Gemini Long Context kaggle comp

There are three sections to this dataset:

1) Building standards This is a copy of construction codes from: https://ncc.abcb.gov.au/ It describes the standards to which Australian residential homes should be constructed and is a valuable resource for anyone looking to assess a home. In Australia this is the minimum standard for new homes.

2) Examples This is a set of "task examples" designed for in-context learning. It is a set of images of houses and corresponding professional assessment (that I have paid experts for)

3) User data Here is a set of images / videos from the house I am looking to evaluate

In general, the idea is that we use Gemini's long context window to effectively evaluate the User data against the building standards, using the examples to demonstrate to the LLM how we want the assessment to work

The index relates to costs ruling on the first day of each month. NATIONAL HOUSE CONSTRUCTION COST INDEX; Up until October 2006 it was known as the National House Building Index Oct 2000 data; The index since October, 2000, includes the first phase of an agreement following a review of rates of pay and grading structures for the Construction Industry and the first phase increase under the PPF. April, May and June 2001; Figures revised in July 2001due to 2% PPF Revised Terms. March 2002; The drop in the March 2002 figure is due to a decrease in the rate of PRSI from 12% to 10¾% with effect from 1 March 2002. The index from April 2002 excludes the one-off lump sum payment equal to 1% of basic pay on 1 April 2002 under the PPF. April, May, June 2003; Figures revised in August'03 due to the backdated increase of 3% from 1April 2003 under the National Partnership Agreement 'Sustaining Progress'. The increases in April and October 2006 index are due to Social Partnership Agreement "Towards 2016". March 2011; The drop in the March 2011 figure is due to a 7.5% decrease in labour costs. Methodology in producing the Index Prior to October 2006: The index relates solely to labour and material costs which should normally not exceed 65% of the total price of a house. It does not include items such as overheads, profit, interest charges, land development etc. The House Building Cost Index monitors labour costs in the construction industry and the cost of building materials. It does not include items such as overheads, profit, interest charges or land development. The labour costs include insurance cover and the building material costs include V.A.T. Coverage: The type of construction covered is a typical 3 bed-roomed, 2 level local authority house and the index is applied on a national basis. Data Collection: The labour costs are based on agreed labour rates, allowances etc. The building material prices are collected at the beginning of each month from the same suppliers for the same representative basket. Calculation: Labour and material costs for the construction of a typical 3 bed-roomed house are weighted together to produce the index. Post October 2006: The name change from the House Building Cost Index to the House Construction Cost Index was introduced in October 2006 when the method of assessing the materials sub-index was changed from pricing a basket of materials (representative of a typical 2 storey 3 bedroomed local authority house) to the CSO Table 3 Wholesale Price Index. The new Index does maintains continuity with the old HBCI. The most current data is published on these sheets. Previously published data may be subject to revision. Any change from the originally published data will be highlighted by a comment on the cell in question. These comments will be maintained for at least a year after the date of the value change. Oct 2008 data; Decrease due to a fall in the Oct Wholesale Price Index. .hidden { display: none }

In this dataset we have to predict the sales price of houses in King County, Seattle. It includes homes sold between May 2014 and May 2015. Before doing anything we should first know about the dataset what it contains what are its features and what is the structure of data.

The dataset cantains 20 house features plus the price, along with 21613 observations.

The description for the 20 features is given below:

id :- It is the unique numeric number assigned to each house being sold. date :- It is the date on which the house was sold out. price:- It is the price of house which we have to predict so this is our target variable and aprat from it are our features. bedrooms :- It determines number of bedrooms in a house. bathrooms :- It determines number of bathrooms in a bedroom of a house. sqft_living :- It is the measurement variable which determines the measurement of house in square foot. sqft_lot : It is also the measurement variable which determines square foot of the lot. floors: It determines total floors means levels of house. waterfront : This feature determines whether a house has a view to waterfront 0 means no 1 means yes. view : This feature determines whether a house has been viewed or not 0 means no 1 means yes. condition : It determines the overall condition of a house on a scale of 1 to 5. grade : It determines the overall grade given to the housing unit, based on King County grading system on a scale of 1 to 11 sqft_above : It determines square footage of house apart from basement. sqft_basement : It determines square footage of the basement of the house. yr_built : It detrmines the date of building of the house. yr_renovated : It detrmines year of renovation of house. zipcode : It determines the zipcode of the location of the house. lat : It determines the latitude of the location of the house. long : It determines the longitude of the location of the house. sqft_living15 : Living room area in 2015(implies-- some renovations) sqft_lot15 : lotSize area in 2015(implies-- some renovations)

IMPORTANT! PLEASE READ DISCLAIMER BEFORE USING DATA. The Residential Existing Homes Program is a market transformation program that uses Building Performance Institute (BPI) Goldstar contractors to install comprehensive energy-efficient improvements. The program is designed to use building science and a whole-house approach to reduce energy use in the State’s existing one-to-four family and low-rise multifamily residential buildings and capture heating fuel and electricity-related savings. The Program provides income-based incentives, including an assisted subsidy for households with income up to 80% of the State or Median County Income, whichever is higher to install eligible energy efficiency improvements including building shell measures, high efficiency heating and cooling measures, ENERGY STAR appliances and lighting.

D I S C L A I M E R: Estimated Annual kWh Savings, Estimated Annual MMBtu Savings, and First Year Energy Savings $ Estimate represent contractor reported savings derived from energy modeling software calculations and not actual realized energy savings. The accuracy of the Estimated Annual kWh Savings and Estimated Annual MMBtu Savings for projects has been evaluated by an independent third party. The results of the impact analysis indicate that, on average, actual savings amount to 35 percent of the Estimated Annual kWh Savings and 65 percent of the Estimated Annual MMBtu Savings. The analysis did not evaluate every single project, but rather a sample of projects from 2007 and 2008, so the results are applicable to the population on average but not necessarily to any individual project which could have over or under achieved in comparison to the evaluated savings. The results from the impact analysis will be updated when more recent information is available. Many factors influence the degree to which estimated savings are realized, including proper calibration of the savings model and the savings algorithms used in the modeling software. Some reasons individual households may realize savings different from those projected include, but are not limited to, changes in the number or needs of household members, changes in occupancy schedules, changes in energy usage behaviors, changes to appliances and electronics installed in the home, and beginning or ending a home business. Beginning November 2017, the Program requires the use of HPXML-compliant modeling software tools and data quality protocols have been implemented to more accurately project savings. For more information, please refer to the Evaluation Report published on NYSERDA’s website at: http://www.nyserda.ny.gov/-/media/Files/Publications/PPSER/Program-Evaluation/2012ContractorReports/2012-HPwES-Impact-Report-with-Appendices.pdf.

The New York Residential Existing Homes (One to Four Units) dataset includes the following data points for projects completed during Green Jobs Green-NY, beginning November 15, 2010: Home Performance Project ID, Home Performance Site ID, Project County, Project City, Project Zip, Gas Utility, Electric Utility, Project Completion Date, Customer Type, Low-Rise or Home Performance Indicator, Total Project Cost (USD), Total Incentives (USD), Type of Program Financing, Amount Financed Through Program (USD), Pre-Retrofit Home Heating Fuel Type, Year Home Built, Size of Home, Volume of Home, Number of Units, Measure Type, Estimated Annual kWh Savings, Estimated Annual MMBtu Savings, First Year Energy Savings $ Estimate (USD), Homeowner Received Green Jobs-Green NY Free/Reduced Cost Audit (Y/N).

How does your organization use this dataset? What other NYSERDA or energy-related datasets would you like to see on Open NY? Let us know by emailing OpenNY@nyserda.ny.gov.

This dataset provides information for Cambridgeshire, West Suffolk and Peterborough, showing the age of homes as provided by the Valuation Office Agency, based on council tax records. The first file of data is specifically focussed on identifying homes with solid walls, as part of the Warm Homes project, so the data has been grouped to highlight the small areas (known as Lower Super Output Areas) where homes fall into three specific age bands: Built before 1929 Built between 1930 to 1939 Built between 1945 and 2015 Some build dates are unknown, there are also counted in the data. Homes built before 1929 all tend to have solid walls, as cavity walls had not been invented. Homes built between 1930 and 1939 may or may not have solid walls, in the period when cavity walls were becoming more popular but not yet "the norm". Few homes were built 1939 to 1945. On the whole, homes built since 1945 tend to have cavity walls. So this data set helps us identify where we can find homes which are most likely to have solid walls, and therefore where a solid wall insulation project might want ot focus its attention. The second data file is more detailed and adds further information on the date homes were built, grouped into ten-year bands, and adds the number of homes in each LSO which falls into council tax bands A to H as well.

Local authority ESB Connections do not include second-hand houses acquired by them. New units acquired under Part V, Planning & Development Acts 2000-2008 for local authority rental purposes are included. Voluntary & co-operative housing consists of housing provided under the capital loan & subsidy and capital assistance schemes. Data on this variable was not available until 1993. ESB Connections data series are based on the number of new dwellings connected by ESB Networks to the electricity supply and may not accord precisely with local authority boundaries. These represent the number of homes completed and available, and do not reflect any work-in progress. Direct comparisons cannot be made with 2006, as those figures included some units built in 2005. ESB Networks have indicated that there was a higher backlog in work-in-progress in 2005 than usual ( estimated as being in the region of 5,000 units). This backlog was cleared through the connection of an additional 2,000 houses in Quarter 1 2006 and 3,000 houses in Quarter 2 2006. Due to circumstances beyond the Department's control it has not been possible to obtain a separate set of figures for the first two quarters of 2005. Direct comparisons cannot be made between pre 2009 and post 2010 data onwards. Up to 2010, completions relating to long term voids and demountables were included as new build completions. The most current data is published on these sheets. Previously published data may be subject to revision. Any change from the originally published data will be highlighted by a comment on the cell in question. These comments will be maintained for at least a year after the date of the value change. 2010 figure for Social Housing-Voluntary & Co-operative Housing; Malcolm Hillis - (DECLG): changed from 741 to 753 as 12 units omitted from original 2010 figures 18/11/15 2015 figure for Social Housing – LA Housing; This was previously 64. It was changed on the 27-4-16 when revised data was received by the Department. .hidden { display: none }