45 datasets found
  1. Number of law enforcement officers U.S. 2004-2023

    • statista.com
    Updated Nov 14, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2024). Number of law enforcement officers U.S. 2004-2023 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/191694/number-of-law-enforcement-officers-in-the-us/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Nov 14, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    How many police officers are there in the U.S.? In 2023, there were 720,652 full-time law enforcement officers employed in the United States, an increase from 708,001 the previous year. Within the provided time period, the number of full-time law enforcement officers was lowest in 2013, with 626,942 officers. Employment in law enforcement According to the source, law enforcement officers are defined as those individuals who regularly carry a firearm and an official badge on their person, have full powers of arrest, and whose salaries are paid from federal funds set aside specifically for sworn law enforcement. Law enforcement, particularly when it comes to officers, is a male-dominated field. Law enforcement employees can either be officers or civilians, and federal law enforcement agencies cover a wide area of jurisdictions -- from the National Park Service to the FBI.
    Police in the United States The police in the United States have come under fire over the past few years for accusations of use of unnecessary force and for the number of people who are shot to death by police in the U.S. Police officers in the United States are regularly armed, and in comparison, 19 countries, including Iceland, New Zealand, and Ireland, do not regularly arm their police forces.

  2. Data from: Police Departments, Arrests and Crime in the United States,...

    • catalog.data.gov
    • icpsr.umich.edu
    Updated Mar 12, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Bureau of Justice Statistics (2025). Police Departments, Arrests and Crime in the United States, 1860-1920 [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/police-departments-arrests-and-crime-in-the-united-states-1860-1920-476a7
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 12, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Bureau of Justice Statisticshttp://bjs.ojp.gov/
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    These data on 19th- and early 20th-century police department and arrest behavior were collected between 1975 and 1978 for a study of police and crime in the United States. Raw and aggregated time-series data are presented in Parts 1 and 3 on 23 American cities for most years during the period 1860-1920. The data were drawn from annual reports of police departments found in the Library of Congress or in newspapers and legislative reports located elsewhere. Variables in Part 1, for which the city is the unit of analysis, include arrests for drunkenness, conditional offenses and homicides, persons dismissed or held, police personnel, and population. Part 3 aggregates the data by year and reports some of these variables on a per capita basis, using a linear interpolation from the last decennial census to estimate population. Part 2 contains data for 267 United States cities for the period 1880-1890 and was generated from the 1880 federal census volume, REPORT ON THE DEFECTIVE, DEPENDENT, AND DELINQUENT CLASSES, published in 1888, and from the 1890 federal census volume, SOCIAL STATISTICS OF CITIES. Information includes police personnel and expenditures, arrests, persons held overnight, trains entering town, and population.

  3. Data from: Multi-Method Study of Police Special Weapons and Tactics Teams in...

    • catalog.data.gov
    • icpsr.umich.edu
    Updated Mar 12, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    National Institute of Justice (2025). Multi-Method Study of Police Special Weapons and Tactics Teams in the United States, 1986-1998 [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/multi-method-study-of-police-special-weapons-and-tactics-teams-in-the-united-states-1986-1-00309
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 12, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    National Institute of Justicehttp://nij.ojp.gov/
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    This research study was designed to pursue three specific goals to accomplish its objective of enhancing knowledge about Special Weapons and Tactics (SWAT) teams and the role they play in contemporary American policing. The first goal was to develop a better picture of the structure and nature of SWAT teams in American law enforcement. The second goal of the research project was to increase the amount of knowledge about how SWAT teams prepare for and execute operations. The project's third goal was to develop information about one specific aspect of SWAT operations: the use of force, especially deadly force, by both officers and suspects. To gather this information, the SWAT Operations Survey (SOS) was conducted. This was a nationwide survey of law enforcement agencies with 50 or more sworn officers. The survey sought information about the agencies' emergency response capabilities and structures. The SOS included two instruments: (1) the Operations Form, completed by a total of 341 agencies, and containing variables about the organization and functioning of SWAT teams, and (2) the Firearms Discharge Report, which includes a total of 273 shootings of interest, as well as items about incidents in which SWAT officers and suspects discharged firearms during SWAT operations.

  4. Share of law enforcement agencies who reported crime data U.S. 2022, by...

    • statista.com
    Updated Jul 10, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2025). Share of law enforcement agencies who reported crime data U.S. 2022, by state [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1368634/crime-data-reported-fbi-by-state-us/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 10, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    2022
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    To estimate national trends of crime, the FBI collects crime reports from law enforcement agencies across the country. In 2022, Delaware, the District of Columbia, and Oklahoma had perfect participation rates, with 100 percent of law enforcement agencies reporting crime data to the FBI in those states. In contrast, the state of Florida had the lowest share of law enforcement agencies who reported crime data to the FBI in the United States, at *** percent. An unreliable source? Along with being the principal investigative agency of the U.S. federal government, the FBI is also in charge of tracking crimes committed in the United States. In recent years, however, the FBI made significant changes to their crime reporting system, requiring a more detailed input on how agencies report their data. Consequently, less crime data has been reported and the FBI has come under criticism as an unreliable source on crime in the United States. In 2022, the FBI was found to rank low on trustworthiness for Americans when compared to other government agencies, further demonstrating the need for transparent and accurate data. Importance of crime rates As crime and policing data can help to analyze emerging issues and policy responses, the inaccuracy of the FBI’s crime reporting system may lead to misinformation which could be used to impact elections and the beliefs of the American public. In addition, the lack of crime data from Republican states such as Florida may prove problematic as 78 percent of Republicans said that crime was a very important issue for them in midterm elections.

  5. e

    Less Lethal Force in Law Enforcement, 2017-2020 - Dataset - B2FIND

    • b2find.eudat.eu
    Updated Oct 21, 2023
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2023). Less Lethal Force in Law Enforcement, 2017-2020 - Dataset - B2FIND [Dataset]. https://b2find.eudat.eu/dataset/95538dad-de0c-5743-8b11-8614e2ae5177
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Oct 21, 2023
    Description

    Use of force is a sometimes necessary, yet often controversial, police power. Attempts to understand and explore police use of force have often been hampered by a lack of data, both nationally and internationally, with much research reliant on a very small number of datasets, often in the United States of America. This new data, collected by police forces in England and Wales and collated and published by the Home Office, represents an exciting new resource. According to the Home Office, 'these statistics cover incidents where police officers have used force and includes: the tactics used, the reason for force, the outcome, any injuries (to the officers and or the subject) and subject information (age, gender, ethnicity and disability, as perceived by the reporting officer). From April 2017, all police forces in the UK have been required to record this data. The use of force data collection is intended to hold police forces to account and to provide the public with greater information on the different types of force used and the context in which this occurs' https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/police-use-of-force-statistics.This project (ES/N016564/1, Less Lethal Force in Law Enforcement) involved, in part, working with various stakeholders to help advise on the creation and maintenance of a new template form for police officers to record their use of force, which in turn has resulted in the collection of new use of force data. A subset of this information, which is generated by the police and published by the Home Office, is routinely made publicly available and this record has been set up to help signpost researchers towards this resource. Further details about the broader ESRC funded project is below: Use of force by law enforcement officials, including police and correctional officers, is a highly important issue. Yet whilst the situations in which these officials use firearms, and the effects of this use, are relatively well documented and understood, this is not the case with 'less lethal' weapons and 'less lethal' force. At least three key topics around less lethal weapons remain under-researched, and this project will tackle all three directly. First we lack a basic understanding of when, why, on whom, and how often, less lethal weapons are used - and whether certain groups of people (those of a particular gender, ethnic minority, mental health status or geographical origin) are more or less likely to have less lethal force used on them. This project will see the PI work closely with the National Police Chief's Council, the Home Office and UK police forces, utilizing datasets previously unavailable to academic researchers to answer such questions. Such issues are also relevant internationally, as shown by recent debates on police less lethal force in countries as varied as Armenia, Hungary and New Zealand. Second, whilst these weapons are associated with saving lives, they have also been associated with serious injuries and fatalities. In the UK alone, several high profile deaths-including that of Ian Tomlinson and Jordan Begley-have occurred following police use of less lethal weapons. There are key questions around how so called less lethal force can impact the right to life, and their association with fatalities worldwide. Building on my PhD work focusing on injuries associated with Taser, this project will see the PI work with the UN Special Rapporteur to research the impact less lethal force has on the right to life in the UK and globally. Third, if it is important to attend to the situations in which force is used, it is also important to look at how such force is monitored and governed. This requires working with police and government to help understand what data on less lethal force should be gathered and analyzed, and working with the independent oversight bodies that monitor places of detention (including police custody) to ensure that they have the necessary research to enable them to document the LLF used by state authorities. The UN Subcommittee for the Prevention of Torture has highlighted the need for research to assist them in addressing and monitoring less lethal weapons and other physical infrastructure found in places of detention. The PI will work with key decision makers on these issues; with the UK government on reporting, and with oversight bodies via the SPT and its network of over 40 national bodies. According to the Home Office's User Guide to Use of Force Statistics, https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/945436/user-guide-police-use-of-force-dec20.pdf (pages 4 - 5): 'Officers must complete a ‘use of force report’ each time they use force tactics on an individual. The use of force reports also allow for other information to be recorded... The publication does not include force used in designated public order events, where officers may use force over a period of time against a person(s) not subsequently apprehended. In these situations, it is not feasible for officers to provide the same level of detail as for individual use of force incidents. Police forces may collect additional information at a local level, with further detail or including designated public order events".

  6. Data from: National Survey of Staffing Issues in Large Police Agencies,...

    • catalog.data.gov
    • icpsr.umich.edu
    Updated Mar 12, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    National Institute of Justice (2025). National Survey of Staffing Issues in Large Police Agencies, 2006-2007 [United States] [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/national-survey-of-staffing-issues-in-large-police-agencies-2006-2007-united-states-ab6e5
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 12, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    National Institute of Justicehttp://nij.ojp.gov/
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    The primary objective of this study was to formulate evidence-based lessons on recruitment, retention, and managing workforce profiles in large, United States police departments. The research team conducted a national survey of all United States municipal police agencies that had at least 300 sworn officers and were listed in the 2007 National Directory of Law Enforcement Administrators. The survey instrument was developed based on the research team's experience in working with large personnel systems, instruments used in previous police staffing surveys, and discussions with police practitioners. The research team distributed the initial surveys on February 27, 2008. To ensure an acceptable response rate, the principal investigators developed a comprehensive nonresponse protocol, provided ample field time for departments to compile information and respond, and provided significant one-on-one technical assistance to agencies as they completed the survey. In all, the surveys were in the field for 38 weeks. Respondents were asked to consult their agency's records in order to provide information about their agency's experience with recruiting, hiring, and retaining officers for 2006 and 2007. Of the 146 departments contacted, 107 completed the survey. The police recruitment and retention survey data were supplemented with data on each jurisdiction from the American Community Survey conducted by the United States Census Bureau, the Bureau of Labor Statistics, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation Uniform Crime Reports. The dataset contains a total of 535 variables pertaining to recruitment, hiring, union activity, compensation rates, promotion, retirement, and attrition. Many of these variables are available by rank, sex and race.

  7. g

    FBI, Law Enforcement Officers Feloniously Killed, Southern USA, 1997-2006

    • geocommons.com
    Updated May 27, 2008
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    data (2008). FBI, Law Enforcement Officers Feloniously Killed, Southern USA, 1997-2006 [Dataset]. http://geocommons.com/search.html
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    May 27, 2008
    Dataset provided by
    data
    U.S. Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Investigation - Criminal Justice Information Services Division
    Description

    This dataset provides information about duly sworn city, university and college, county, state, tribal, and federal law enforcement officers who were feloniously killed in the line of duty from 1997-2006 in the South. More non-geographic statistics about these fatalities can be found at http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/killed/2006/feloniouslykilled.html note: Data from the past 10 years do not include the officers who died as a result of the events of September 11, 2001. http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/killed/2006/table1.html

  8. Data from: Felonious Homicides of American Police Officers, 1977-1992

    • catalog.data.gov
    • s.cnmilf.com
    • +2more
    Updated Mar 12, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    National Institute of Justice (2025). Felonious Homicides of American Police Officers, 1977-1992 [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/felonious-homicides-of-american-police-officers-1977-1992-25657
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 12, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    National Institute of Justicehttp://nij.ojp.gov/
    Description

    The study was a comprehensive analysis of felonious killings of officers. The purposes of the study were (1) to analyze the nature and circumstances of incidents of felonious police killings and (2) to analyze trends in the numbers and rates of killings across different types of agencies and to explain these differences. For Part 1, Incident-Level Data, an incident-level database was created to capture all incidents involving the death of a police officer from 1983 through 1992. Data on officers and incidents were collected from the Law Enforcement Officers Killed and Assaulted (LEOKA) data collection as coded by the Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) program. In addition to the UCR data, the Police Foundation also coded information from the LEOKA narratives that are not part of the computerized LEOKA database from the FBI. For Part 2, Agency-Level Data, the researchers created an agency-level database to research systematic differences among rates at which law enforcement officers had been feloniously killed from 1977 through 1992. The investigators focused on the 56 largest law enforcement agencies because of the availability of data for explanatory variables. Variables in Part 1 include year of killing, involvement of other officers, if the officer was killed with his/her own weapon, circumstances of the killing, location of fatal wounds, distance between officer and offender, if the victim was wearing body armor, if different officers were killed in the same incident, if the officer was in uniform, actions of the killer and of the officer at entry and final stage, if the killer was visible at first, if the officer thought the killer was a felon suspect, if the officer was shot at entry, and circumstances at anticipation, entry, and final stages. Demographic variables for Part 1 include victim's sex, age, race, type of assignment, rank, years of experience, agency, population group, and if the officer was working a security job. Part 2 contains variables describing the general municipal environment, such as whether the agency is located in the South, level of poverty according to a poverty index, population density, percent of population that was Hispanic or Black, and population aged 15-34 years old. Variables capturing the crime environment include the violent crime rate, property crime rate, and a gun-related crime index. Lastly, variables on the environment of the police agencies include violent and property crime arrests per 1,000 sworn officers, percentage of officers injured in assaults, and number of sworn officers.

  9. Law Enforcement Software Market Analysis, Size, and Forecast 2025-2029:...

    • technavio.com
    pdf
    Updated Apr 9, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Technavio (2025). Law Enforcement Software Market Analysis, Size, and Forecast 2025-2029: North America (US and Canada), Europe (France, Germany, Italy, The Netherlands, and UK), Middle East and Africa , APAC (China, India, and Japan), South America , and Rest of World (ROW) [Dataset]. https://www.technavio.com/report/law-enforcement-software-market-industry-analysis
    Explore at:
    pdfAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Apr 9, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    TechNavio
    Authors
    Technavio
    License

    https://www.technavio.com/content/privacy-noticehttps://www.technavio.com/content/privacy-notice

    Time period covered
    2025 - 2029
    Area covered
    Canada, United Kingdom, United States
    Description

    Snapshot img

    Law Enforcement Software Market Size 2025-2029

    The law enforcement software market size is forecast to increase by US $1.78 billion, at a CAGR of 11.8% between 2024 and 2029. The market is a dynamic and continually evolving landscape, with various sectors increasingly relying on technology to enhance their operations.

    Major Market Trends & Insights

    North America dominated the market and accounted for a 36% growth during the forecast period.
    The market is expected to grow significantly in Europe Region as well over the forecast period.
    By the Deployment, the On premises sub-segment was valued at US $817.70 billion in 2023
    By the Type, the Software sub-segment accounted for the largest market revenue share in 2023
    

    Market Size & Forecast

    Market Opportunities: US $199.42 billion
    Future Opportunities: US $1.78 billion 
    CAGR : 11.8%
    North America: Largest market in 2023
    
    
    
    This market encompasses a range of applications, from use in criminal investigations and case management to communication and community policing through social media. One notable trend is the growing importance of social media in law enforcement. Agencies are increasingly utilizing social media platforms to gather intelligence, engage with the public, and respond to emergencies. This shift is driven by the vast amount of information available on these platforms and the potential for real-time engagement and communication.
    Another significant factor influencing the market is the high implementation and maintenance costs. These costs can include expenses related to hardware, software, training, and ongoing support. Despite these costs, the benefits of using advanced technology in law enforcement are substantial, including improved efficiency, enhanced data analysis capabilities, and increased public safety. The implementation and use of law enforcement software are not without challenges, however. Agencies must ensure the security and privacy of sensitive data, as well as address issues related to data accuracy and interoperability between different systems. Additionally, there is a need for effective communication and collaboration between different law enforcement agencies and departments to maximize the benefits of these technologies.
    In terms of market size, the market is significant, with numerous companies offering a range of solutions. However, specific figures are not provided in this context. The market is expected to continue growing as technology advances and law enforcement agencies increasingly adopt technology to enhance their operations. The ongoing evolution of the market is driven by factors such as the increasing use of social media, the need for effective communication and collaboration, and the growing importance of data analysis and intelligence gathering.
    

    What will be the Size of the Law Enforcement Software Market during the forecast period?

    Get Key Insights on Market Forecast (PDF) Request Free Sample

    The market encompasses a range of technologies designed to enhance investigative capabilities and improve operational efficiency for law enforcement agencies. According to recent data, the market currently accounts for over 15% of the global public safety software market share. Looking ahead, this sector is anticipated to experience a steady growth rate, with projections indicating a 10% expansion over the next five years. A comparison of key market components reveals that data privacy compliance software holds a significant market presence, with a 25% share in 2021. Meanwhile, text analytics software is poised for substantial growth, projected to capture a 12% market share by 2026.
    These figures underscore the importance of data security and analysis in the evolving law enforcement landscape. Additionally, the integration of advanced technologies, such as natural language processing, fingerprint identification, and voice recognition technology, is driving innovation and enhancing the overall effectiveness of law enforcement software solutions. As the market continues to mature and adapt to the needs of law enforcement agencies, the integration of open source intelligence, geospatial intelligence software, and digital evidence processing systems is expected to further expand the capabilities of these solutions.
    

    How is this Law Enforcement Software Industry segmented?

    The law enforcement software industry research report provides comprehensive data (region-wise segment analysis), with forecasts and estimates in 'USD million' for the period 2025-2029, as well as historical data from 2019-2023 for the following segments.

    Deployment
    
      On premises
      Cloud based
    
    
    Type
    
      Software
      Services
    
    
    End-user
    
      Police departments
      Municipalities
      Others
    
    
    Soluion Type
    
      Computer-Aided Dispatch (CAD)
      Record Management Systems (RMS)
      Case Management Systems (CMS)
      Jail Management Systems (JMS)
      Digital Policing Software
    
  10. F

    Employed full time: Wage and salary workers: Police and sheriff's patrol...

    • fred.stlouisfed.org
    json
    Updated Jan 17, 2020
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2020). Employed full time: Wage and salary workers: Police and sheriff's patrol officers occupations: 16 years and over [Dataset]. https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/LEU0254491900A
    Explore at:
    jsonAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jan 17, 2020
    License

    https://fred.stlouisfed.org/legal/#copyright-public-domainhttps://fred.stlouisfed.org/legal/#copyright-public-domain

    Description

    Graph and download economic data for Employed full time: Wage and salary workers: Police and sheriff's patrol officers occupations: 16 years and over (LEU0254491900A) from 2000 to 2019 about police, occupation, full-time, salaries, workers, 16 years +, wages, employment, and USA.

  11. g

    U.S. Department of Justice,Full-time State Law Enforcement Employees, USA by...

    • geocommons.com
    Updated May 5, 2008
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Emily Sciarillo (2008). U.S. Department of Justice,Full-time State Law Enforcement Employees, USA by State, 2006 [Dataset]. http://geocommons.com/search.html
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    May 5, 2008
    Dataset provided by
    U.S. Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Investigation; Criminal Justice Information Services Division
    dwoolfe
    Authors
    Emily Sciarillo
    Description

    This dataset was retrieved from the U.S. Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Investigation Criminal Justice Information Services Division website on February 29, 2008. "This table provides the total number of state law enforcement employees, the total number of male officers, the total number of female officers, the total number of male civilian employees, and the total number of female civilian employees". Values for individual agencies were aggregated for each state. Estimated population was added for each state for 2006 that appeared on Table 5 of the data from 2006. "The FBI collects these data through the Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program". Please see the Data Declaration for further information on the data set. Values of -1 represent no value.

  12. d

    Replication Data for: Who Guards the Guardians? Political Accountability...

    • search.dataone.org
    • dataverse.harvard.edu
    Updated Nov 14, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Zoorob, Michael (2023). Replication Data for: Who Guards the Guardians? Political Accountability over the Police in the United States [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/IXRH7Y
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Nov 14, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Harvard Dataverse
    Authors
    Zoorob, Michael
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    Under what conditions can citizens hold government officials accountable for their behavior? I examine accountability over the police, a pervasive face of the state as experienced by most people. Like elected politicians, police enjoy significant discretion, limited oversight, power, and corruptibility. Continued problems of police violence and disparate treatment, especially against Black Americans, have shown the importance of accountable policing. Using calls for service records, election returns, survey data, and case studies, I explore challenges of political accountability across the highly varied 18,000 police department in the United States. The police are both a nationally salient social group – evaluated differently by partisans in a national media environment – as well as a locally-provided government function that tens of millions of Americans encounter regularly. This decentralization complicates improvements to policing policies by limiting the impacts of reform activism to particular cities and by misaligning activism with local conditions (Chapter 1). Millions of Americans regularly call the police to manage a swathe of urgent problems. Examining whether citizens punish street-level bureaucrats for misbehavior by withdrawing from demands for police intervention, I find that daily demands for policing services remain steady after well-publicized police abuse (Chapter 2). Absent exit, change requires political action. One manifestation of the varieties of American policing is between elected and appointed police leadership. I show that each approach has problems: elected sheriffs seem too steady in their offices – over which they enjoy almost unfettered control and significant incumbency advantage – while appointed police chiefs are constrained by unions, politicians, and the public (Chapter 3). Drawing on case studies of immigration enforcement in county jails, I show that nationally salient issues can impinge on the domains of county Sheriffs and increase interest and energy in local elections – aligning policies with preferences through a process I term “redirected nationalization” (Chapter 4). An additional problem is that police officers are themselves political agents who can resist change. By analyzing their nearly universal support for Donald Trump in the 2016 election, and the status of police as a salient cleavage in American electoral politics, I show a strong affinity between police union and right-wing politics rooted in the sense that police are “under siege” by Black Lives Matter and calls for reform (Chapter 5). This uniform conservative orientation of police culture clashes with the array of problems the police manage, which frequently include homelessness and mental illness (Chapter 6, co-authored with Jacob Brown). I conclude that, where possible, it is better to unbundle the multifaceted police role, with specialized civil servants responding to classes of problems (Chapter 7). However, the decentralization of policing in the United States and the ambiguity of many calls for services will complicate unbundling. Hence, there remains a need to cultivate a police culture sensitive to the range of problems police encounter and, longer term, to ameliorate the social conditions which drive reliance on police services.

  13. g

    FBI, Law Enforcement Officers Accidentally Killed, USA, 1997-2006

    • geocommons.com
    Updated May 27, 2008
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    U.S. Department of Justice; Federal Bureau of Investigation; Criminal Justice Information Services Division (2008). FBI, Law Enforcement Officers Accidentally Killed, USA, 1997-2006 [Dataset]. http://geocommons.com/search.html
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    May 27, 2008
    Dataset provided by
    U.S. Department of Justice; Federal Bureau of Investigation; Criminal Justice Information Services Division
    data
    Description

    This dataset provides information about duly sworn city, university and college, county, state, tribal, and federal law enforcement officers who were accidentally killed in the line of duty from 1997-2006 in the USA. More non-geographic statistics about these fatalities can be found at http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/killed/2006/accidentallykilled.html http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/killed/2006/table46.html

  14. F

    Government current expenditures: State and local: Public order and safety:...

    • fred.stlouisfed.org
    json
    Updated Dec 19, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2024). Government current expenditures: State and local: Public order and safety: Police [Dataset]. https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/G160851A027NBEA
    Explore at:
    jsonAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Dec 19, 2024
    License

    https://fred.stlouisfed.org/legal/#copyright-public-domainhttps://fred.stlouisfed.org/legal/#copyright-public-domain

    Description

    Graph and download economic data for Government current expenditures: State and local: Public order and safety: Police (G160851A027NBEA) from 1959 to 2023 about police, state & local, expenditures, government, GDP, and USA.

  15. Outcome Evaluation of the Comprehensive Indian Resources for Community and...

    • icpsr.umich.edu
    • catalog.data.gov
    Updated Jan 20, 2015
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Brimley, Stephen; Garrow, Carrie; Jorgensen, Miriam; Wakeling, Stewart (2015). Outcome Evaluation of the Comprehensive Indian Resources for Community and Law Enforcement (CIRCLE) Project With Data From Nine Tribes in the United States, 1995-2004 [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR20402.v1
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jan 20, 2015
    Dataset provided by
    Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Researchhttps://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/pages/
    Authors
    Brimley, Stephen; Garrow, Carrie; Jorgensen, Miriam; Wakeling, Stewart
    License

    https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/studies/20402/termshttps://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/studies/20402/terms

    Time period covered
    1995 - 2004
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    The data for this study were collected in Phase 2, the outcome evaluation, of the Comprehensive Indian Resources for Community and Law Enforcement (CIRCLE) Project. The CIRCLE Project was launched in the late 1990s to strengthen tribal justice systems and, through effective tribal-level planning and strategic comprehensive approaches, to better equip Native American nations to combat the interlinked community problems of crime, violence, substance abuse, and juvenile delinquency. The Native American nations invited to participate in the CIRCLE Project were the Northern Cheyenne, the Ogling Sioux, and the Zuni. Part 1, Participant Data, contains data on each of the Native American nations. The Northern Cheyenne data include variables on juvenile arrests between 1995 and 2003 for intoxication, curfew violations, disorderly conduct, and total arrests. The Oglala Sioux data include variables on police force stability and court pleadings. The Zuni data include variables on arrests for simple assault, public intoxication, driving while intoxicated (DWI), endangerment, domestic violence, and total arrests between 2001 and 2004. Part 2, United States Department of Justice Funding Data, contains data on funding given to the Northern Cheyenne, the Oglala Sioux, the Zuni, and six comparison Native American nations for fiscal years 1998 to 2003.

  16. Police And Law Enforcement Equipment Market Analysis, Size, and Forecast...

    • technavio.com
    pdf
    Updated May 20, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Technavio (2025). Police And Law Enforcement Equipment Market Analysis, Size, and Forecast 2025-2029: North America (US and Canada), Europe (France, Germany, Italy, and UK), APAC (China, India, Japan, and South Korea), and Rest of World (ROW) [Dataset]. https://www.technavio.com/report/police-and-law-enforcement-equipment-market-analysis
    Explore at:
    pdfAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    May 20, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    TechNavio
    Authors
    Technavio
    Time period covered
    2025 - 2029
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    Snapshot img

    Police And Law Enforcement Equipment Market Size 2025-2029

    The police and law enforcement equipment market size is forecast to increase by USD 1.51 billion, at a CAGR of 6.7% between 2024 and 2029.

    The market is witnessing significant growth, driven by the increasing prioritization of public place protection in the wake of heightened security concerns.The law enforcement equipment market continues to evolve, driven by the ever-changing needs of various sectors. Mobile data terminals enable officers to access real-time information, enhancing response times and decision-making capabilities. Night vision equipment and thermal imaging cameras expand the scope of investigations, particularly in low-light conditions.
    Speed detection devices and radar systems ensure road safety, while DNA analysis tools aid in forensic investigations. Emergency response vehicles are equipped with advanced communication systems and dispatch console systems for efficient coordination. Shot detection systems and taser deployment systems prioritize officer safety. Cybersecurity solutions protect sensitive data, and criminal database systems facilitate effective investigations.
    

    Major Market Trends & Insights

    North America dominated the market and accounted for a 41% share in 2023.
    The market is expected to grow significantly in Europe region as well over the forecast period.
    Based on the End-user, the police segment led the market and was valued at USD 1.74 billion of the global revenue in 2023.
    Based on the Product, the lethal and non-lethal weapons segment accounted for the largest market revenue share in 2023.
    

    Market Size & Forecast

    Market Opportunities: USD 3.92 Billion
    Future Opportunities: USD 1.51 Billion
    CAGR (2024-2029): 6.7%
    North America: Largest market in 2023
    

    What will be the Size of the Police And Law Enforcement Equipment Market during the forecast period?

    Explore in-depth regional segment analysis with market size data - historical 2019-2023 and forecasts 2025-2029 - in the full report.
    Request Free Sample

    Protective gear, including ballistic vests, shields, and helmets, safeguards officers during high-risk situations. Evidence collection techniques, such as fingerprint scanners and digital forensics tools, ensure accurate and timely collection and analysis of evidence. Remote sensing technology, UAVs/drones, and facial recognition software expand the reach and capabilities of law enforcement agencies. Riot control equipment and surveillance systems deter and respond to civil unrest. Crime prevention strategies, including body-worn cameras, license-plate scanning, and conducted energy weapons (CEWs), promote transparency and accountability. Key communication tools, such as communications/radio systems, enable secure real-time coordination in the field.For instance, a large metropolitan police department implemented a digital evidence management system, resulting in a 30% increase in the number of cases solved. For instance, a large metropolitan police department implemented a digital evidence management system, resulting in a 30% increase in the number of cases solved. Tactical gear and thermal imaging are also increasingly utilized for enhanced operational readiness in low-visibility conditions.

    This trend is further fueled by the integration of technology into law enforcement, such as the use of social media for investigative purposes and web real-time communication. However, the market faces challenges due to the lack of infrastructure and resources, which can hinder the adoption and effective implementation of advanced technologies and equipment.

    As the demand for enhanced security solutions continues to rise, companies must navigate these challenges to capitalize on the market's potential and provide innovative, cost-effective solutions to meet the evolving needs of law enforcement agencies.

    How is this Police And Law Enforcement Equipment Industry segmented?

    The police and law enforcement equipment industry research report provides comprehensive data (region-wise segment analysis), with forecasts and estimates in 'USD million' for the period 2025-2029, as well as historical data from 2019-2023 for the following segments.

    End-user
    
      Police
      Court
      Law enforcement agencies and others
    
    
    Product
    
      Lethal and non-lethal weapons
      Surveillance systems
      Communication systems
      Personal protective equipment and others
    
    
    Type
    
      Body armor
      Handguns
      Batons
      Restraints
      Riot shields
    
    
    Geography
    
      North America
    
        US
        Canada
    
    
      Europe
    
        France
        Germany
        Italy
        UK
    
    
      APAC
    
        China
        India
        Japan
        South Korea
    
    
      Rest of World (ROW)
    

    By End-user Insights

    The global police segment within the broader security technology market is undergoing continuous evolution, driven by the integration of advanced digital technologies into public safety operations. As law enforcement agenc

  17. d

    Replication Data for: The Militarization of Law Enforcement: Evidence from...

    • dataone.org
    • dataverse.harvard.edu
    Updated Nov 22, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Flores-Macías, Gustavo; Zarkin, Jessica (2023). Replication Data for: The Militarization of Law Enforcement: Evidence from Latin America [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/W1YYEV
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Nov 22, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Harvard Dataverse
    Authors
    Flores-Macías, Gustavo; Zarkin, Jessica
    Area covered
    Latin America
    Description

    What are the political consequences of militarizing law enforcement? Across the world, law enforcement has become increasingly militarized over the last three decades, with civilian police operating more like armed forces and soldiers replacing civilian police in law enforcement tasks. Scholarly, policy, and journalistic attention has mostly focused on the first type, but has neglected the study of three main areas toward which this article seeks to contribute: 1) the constabularization of the military—i.e., when the armed forces take on the responsibilities of civilian law enforcement agencies, 2) the extent to which this process has taken place outside of the United States, and 3) its political consequences. Toward this end, this article unpacks the concept of militarized law enforcement, develops theoretical expectations about its political consequences, takes stock of militarization in Latin America, and evaluates whether expectations have played out in the region. It shows that the distinction between civilian and military law enforcement typical of democratic regimes has been severely blurred in the region. Further, it argues that the constabularization of the military has had important consequences for the quality of democracy in the region by undermining citizen security, human rights, police reform, and the legal order.

  18. D

    Police Body Camera Market Report | Global Forecast From 2025 To 2033

    • dataintelo.com
    csv, pdf, pptx
    Updated Jan 7, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Dataintelo (2025). Police Body Camera Market Report | Global Forecast From 2025 To 2033 [Dataset]. https://dataintelo.com/report/police-body-camera-market
    Explore at:
    csv, pptx, pdfAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jan 7, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Dataintelo
    License

    https://dataintelo.com/privacy-and-policyhttps://dataintelo.com/privacy-and-policy

    Time period covered
    2024 - 2032
    Area covered
    Global
    Description

    Police Body Camera Market Outlook



    The global market size for police body cameras in 2023 is estimated to be around USD 500 million, with expectations to reach approximately USD 1.2 billion by 2032, reflecting a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of about 10.2%. Growth in this market is fueled by increasing concerns over public safety, accountability, and the need for transparent law enforcement practices. The adoption of police body cameras has been witnessed across various regions, driven by government mandates and public demand for increased transparency.



    One of the significant growth factors in the police body camera market is the rising demand for accountability and transparency in law enforcement. Incidents of police misconduct and the subsequent public outcry have led to the implementation of body cameras as a means of documenting interactions between police officers and civilians. This has not only helped in providing clear evidence during investigations but also acted as a deterrent against misconduct from both parties. As a result, many law enforcement agencies across the globe are increasingly adopting body camera programs, driving the market's growth.



    Technological advancements in body camera devices have also played a crucial role in market expansion. The development of high-resolution cameras, enhanced storage solutions, and real-time data transmission capabilities have significantly improved the functionality and effectiveness of body cameras. Features such as night vision, wide-angle lenses, and automatic recording during critical situations have made these devices indispensable tools for modern law enforcement. Moreover, integration with other communication systems and the use of artificial intelligence for data analysis are further enhancing the utility of police body cameras, contributing to their growing adoption.



    The availability of funding and financial support from governments and other organizations has also been a key driver for the police body camera market. Many governments have recognized the importance of body cameras in improving public safety and have allocated substantial budgets for their procurement and implementation. Additionally, grants and financial aids from non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and international bodies have further facilitated the adoption of body cameras, especially in regions with limited resources. This financial backing has significantly bolstered the market, making it more accessible to various law enforcement agencies.



    From a regional outlook, North America holds a significant share in the police body camera market, largely due to early adoption and strong government mandates. The United States, in particular, has been at the forefront, with many states implementing laws requiring police officers to wear body cameras. Europe is also experiencing notable growth, driven by similar regulatory measures and increasing public demand for accountability. Meanwhile, the Asia Pacific region is expected to witness rapid growth due to rising awareness and increasing investments in public safety infrastructure. In contrast, regions such as Latin America and the Middle East & Africa are gradually catching up, driven by pilot programs and growing recognition of the benefits of body cameras.



    Product Type Analysis



    The police body camera market can be segmented by product type into standalone and integrated cameras. Standalone body cameras are self-contained units that operate independently, providing the flexibility to be used in various situations without depending on other devices. These cameras are typically easy to deploy and manage, making them a popular choice for many law enforcement agencies. They often include features such as high-definition recording, extended battery life, and robust storage capabilities. The standalone segment has seen consistent growth due to its versatility and ease of use, appealing to a broad range of end-users.



    Integrated body cameras, on the other hand, are designed to work in conjunction with other systems such as communication devices and data management platforms. These cameras offer enhanced functionality by allowing seamless integration with existing infrastructure, providing real-time data transmission and centralized management capabilities. Integrated cameras are particularly beneficial for larger law enforcement agencies that require advanced data management and coordination across various departments. This segment is gaining traction as agencies seek to streamline operations and improve data accessibility and analysis.



    <a

  19. Review of Open Call Record Datasets concerning the U.S. 911 Emergency...

    • zenodo.org
    • data.niaid.nih.gov
    Updated Mar 31, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Micah Mutrux; Micah Mutrux (2023). Review of Open Call Record Datasets concerning the U.S. 911 Emergency Response System [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7785934
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 31, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Zenodohttp://zenodo.org/
    Authors
    Micah Mutrux; Micah Mutrux
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    The data available here identifies and describes a sampling of publicly available datasets about the 911 emergency response system. This list of datasets is a resource for researchers, civic technologists, activists, and journalists seeking to learn more about the 911 emergency response system. The list helps to identify relevant datasets that could be used to understand various types of 911 activity.

    During the first quarter of 2021, the R911 NAT created a list of priority cities including the top 100 cities by population, all state capitals, and the 82 cities that are home to Code for America Brigades. The team then conducted internet searches for each city using terms like “911 calls for service” and “open 911 data.” The dataset and a codebook defining each of these fields are provided as .csv files within a zip file.

    Note: this file does not contain the actual 911 datasets, which often number in the millions of records. The data_link field contains the URL of the site where each dataset is publicly available.

    See also: The Reimagine 911 knowledge base at: https://reimagine-911.gitbook.io/knowledge-base

    Contributors: This open data review was performed by the Code for America Reimagine 911 National Action Team. Contributing team members include: Aleks Hatfield, Brandon Bolton, Chizo Nwagwu, Dan Stormont, Elaine Chow, Em Spalti, Erica Pauls, Gio Sce, Gregory Janesch, Iva Momcheva, Ivelina Momcheva, Jamie Klenetsky Fay, Jason Trout, Jaya Prasad Jayakumar, Jennifer Miller, Jim Grenadier, Joanna Smith, Jonathan Melvin, Katlyn McGraw, Margaret Fine, Mariah Lynch, Micah Mutrux, Michelle Hoogenhout, Patina Herring, Peter Zeglen, Sarah Graham, Sebastian Barajas

  20. o

    Data and Code for: Who Watches the Watchmen? Local News and Police Behavior...

    • openicpsr.org
    delimited
    Updated May 9, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Nicola Mastrorocco; Arianna Ornaghi (2024). Data and Code for: Who Watches the Watchmen? Local News and Police Behavior in the United States [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.3886/E202421V1
    Explore at:
    delimitedAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    May 9, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    American Economic Association
    Authors
    Nicola Mastrorocco; Arianna Ornaghi
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Time period covered
    Jan 1, 2010 - Dec 31, 2017
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    Do U.S. municipal police departments respond to news coverage of local crime? We address this question exploiting an exogenous shock to local crime reporting induced by acquisitions of local TV stations by a large broadcast group, Sinclair. Using a unique dataset of 8.5 million news stories and a triple differences design, we document that Sinclair ownership decreases news coverage of local crime. This matters for policing: municipalities that experience the change in news coverage have lower violent crime clearance rates relative to municipalities that do not. The result is consistent with a decrease of crime salience in the public opinion.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Statista (2024). Number of law enforcement officers U.S. 2004-2023 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/191694/number-of-law-enforcement-officers-in-the-us/
Organization logo

Number of law enforcement officers U.S. 2004-2023

Explore at:
21 scholarly articles cite this dataset (View in Google Scholar)
Dataset updated
Nov 14, 2024
Dataset authored and provided by
Statistahttp://statista.com/
Area covered
United States
Description

How many police officers are there in the U.S.? In 2023, there were 720,652 full-time law enforcement officers employed in the United States, an increase from 708,001 the previous year. Within the provided time period, the number of full-time law enforcement officers was lowest in 2013, with 626,942 officers. Employment in law enforcement According to the source, law enforcement officers are defined as those individuals who regularly carry a firearm and an official badge on their person, have full powers of arrest, and whose salaries are paid from federal funds set aside specifically for sworn law enforcement. Law enforcement, particularly when it comes to officers, is a male-dominated field. Law enforcement employees can either be officers or civilians, and federal law enforcement agencies cover a wide area of jurisdictions -- from the National Park Service to the FBI.
Police in the United States The police in the United States have come under fire over the past few years for accusations of use of unnecessary force and for the number of people who are shot to death by police in the U.S. Police officers in the United States are regularly armed, and in comparison, 19 countries, including Iceland, New Zealand, and Ireland, do not regularly arm their police forces.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu