Facebook
TwitterThe 2014 Survey of State Attorneys General (SAG) collected information on jurisdiction, sources and circumstances of case referrals, and the participation of attorneys general offices in federal or state white-collar crime task forces in 2014. White-collar crime was defined by the Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS) as: "any violation of law committed through non-violent means, involving lies, omissions, deceit, misrepresentation, or violation of a position of trust, by an individual or organization for personal or organizational benefit." SAG sought to analyze how attorneys general offices as an organization in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and U.S. territories respond to white-collar offenses in their jurisdiction. BJS asked respondents to focus on the following criminal and civil offenses: bank fraud, consumer fraud, insurance fraud, medical fraud, securities fraud, tax fraud, environmental offenses, false claims and statements, illegal payments to governmental officials (giving or receiving), unfair trade practices, and workplace-related offenses (e.g., unsafe working conditions). Variables included whether or not offices handled criminal or civil cases in the above categories, estimated number of cases in each category, and what types of criminal or civil sanctions were imposed on white-collar offenders. Researchers also assessed collaboration with partners outside of state attorneys offices, whether cases were referred for federal or local prosecution, and what circumstances lead to referring cases to state regulatory agencies. The extent to which state attorneys offices maintain white-collar crime data was also recorded.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Comprehensive dataset containing 10 verified Lawyer locations in United States with complete contact information, ratings, reviews, and location data.
Facebook
TwitterThis dataset provides details about the Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Program (SAUSA). Despite overall staffing shortages throughout the fiscal year, OPLA expanded number of full-time SAUSA participants on detail to the DOJ, where its attorneys prosecute criminal immigration and customs violations in federal courts.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
We curate a large corpus of legal and administrative data. The utility of this data is twofold: (1) to aggregate legal and administrative data sources that demonstrate different norms and legal standards for data filtering; (2) to collect a dataset that can be used in the future for pretraining legal-domain language models, a key direction in access-to-justice initiatives.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Comprehensive dataset containing 10,220 verified Civil law attorney businesses in United States with complete contact information, ratings, reviews, and location data.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
The American Bar Association’s annual Survey on Lawyer Discipline (SOLD) reports complaints and charges regarding lawyer misconduct, the caseload per disciplinary attorney, and each state’s budget for attorney discipline. From these reports, we develop five measures of attorney discipline: 1. COMPLAINTS – the percent of attorneys in the state who receive complaints from the public. 2. CHARGED – the percent of attorneys that are charged with some form of misconduct during the year; 3. CHARGED/ COMPLAINTS – the percent of the attorneys receiving COMPLAINTS that are eventually CHARGED with malpractice; 4. BUDGET (in dollars) – the state’s annual budget for implementing attorney discipline relative to the number of attorneys; and 5. CASELOAD – the number of AD cases per state disciplinary attorney per year.
In our study "ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE, THE QUALITY OF LEGAL SYSTEMS AND ECONOMIC GROWTH WITHIN THE UNITED STATES" we use these measures to examine the quality of legal systems within the United States and the relation between this quality and state economic growth. The panel data set, included here, contains the values of the 5 attorney discipline measures for each state from 2000-2017. We use these data in our study.
Facebook
TwitterSuccess.ai’s Legal Parties Data provides comprehensive access to verified profiles of legal professionals worldwide. Sourced from over 700 million LinkedIn profiles, this dataset includes actionable insights and contact details for lawyers, in-house counsel, legal advisors, and other professionals in the legal sector. Whether your goal is to promote legal services, recruit top legal talent, or analyze trends in the legal industry, Success.ai ensures your outreach is powered by accurate, enriched, and continuously updated data.
Why Choose Success.ai’s Legal Parties Data? Comprehensive Professional Profiles
Access verified LinkedIn profiles of attorneys, paralegals, compliance officers, corporate counsel, and law firm partners. AI-driven validation ensures 99% accuracy, reducing bounce rates and enabling effective communication. Global Coverage Across Legal Sectors
Includes professionals from corporate law, litigation, intellectual property, compliance, contract law, and legal consulting. Covers major markets across North America, Europe, APAC, and emerging legal hubs globally. Continuously Updated Dataset
Reflects real-time changes in roles, organizational affiliations, and professional achievements to keep your targeting relevant and impactful. Tailored for Legal Insights
Enriched profiles include work histories, areas of specialization, firm affiliations, and professional certifications for deeper engagement opportunities. Data Highlights: 700M+ Verified LinkedIn Profiles: Access a global network of legal professionals in all major practice areas. 100M+ Work Emails: Communicate directly with lawyers, corporate counsel, and legal advisors. Enriched Professional Histories: Gain insights into career trajectories, case specializations, and law firm affiliations. Industry-Specific Segmentation: Target legal professionals in corporate law, litigation, IP law, and more with precision filters. Key Features of the Dataset: Legal Professional Profiles
Identify and connect with legal advisors, corporate counsel, compliance officers, and law firm executives. Engage with professionals influencing corporate decisions, legal compliance, and contract negotiations. Detailed Organizational Insights
Leverage data on firm sizes, practice areas, client industries, and geographic reach. Align outreach with the specific legal expertise and client focus of target professionals. Advanced Filters for Precision Targeting
Refine searches by region, practice area, role, or years of experience for tailored outreach. Customize campaigns to address specific needs like compliance solutions, legal tech tools, or advisory services. AI-Driven Enrichment
Enhanced datasets deliver actionable insights for personalized campaigns, highlighting notable cases, certifications, and career milestones. Strategic Use Cases: Marketing Legal Services
Promote compliance software, contract management tools, or legal advisory services to attorneys and corporate counsel. Engage with professionals responsible for legal operations and corporate governance. Recruitment and Talent Acquisition
Target HR professionals and law firm recruiters seeking attorneys, paralegals, or compliance officers. Simplify hiring for specialized legal roles and law firm expansion efforts. Collaboration and Partnerships
Identify firms and legal professionals for collaborations on compliance programs, regulatory updates, or client representation. Build partnerships with firms specializing in intellectual property, corporate governance, or international law. Market Research and Strategy Development
Analyze trends in legal services, compliance requirements, and litigation to inform strategic decisions. Use insights to adapt offerings to evolving legal needs and market opportunities. Why Choose Success.ai? Best Price Guarantee
Access industry-leading Legal Parties Data at unmatched pricing to ensure cost-effective campaigns and outreach strategies. Seamless Integration
Easily integrate verified legal data into CRMs, marketing platforms, or recruitment systems using APIs or downloadable formats. AI-Validated Accuracy
Depend on 99% accurate data to minimize wasted efforts and maximize engagement with legal professionals. Customizable Solutions
Tailor datasets to focus on specific legal fields, geographic regions, or practice areas to meet your strategic objectives. Strategic APIs for Enhanced Campaigns: Data Enrichment API
Enhance existing records with verified legal professional profiles for better audience targeting and engagement. Lead Generation API
Automate lead generation for a consistent pipeline of qualified legal professionals, scaling your outreach efficiently. Success.ai’s Legal Parties Data empowers you to connect with professionals shaping the legal industry worldwide. With verified contact details, enriched professional profiles, and global reach, your marketing, recruitment, and c...
Facebook
TwitterOpen Data Commons Attribution License (ODC-By) v1.0https://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/
License information was derived automatically
Title: California Lawyers: Yellow Pages Dataset⚖️
Dive into the heart of California's legal landscape with our meticulously curated dataset, "California Lawyers: Yellow Pages Dataset⚖️." This collection offers a panoramic view of over 800 legal professionals and firms dotted across the Golden State, each entry a beacon of potential insight into the dynamics of legal services in this vibrant region. From bustling metropolises like Los Angeles and San Francisco to the serene landscapes of Napa Valley, our dataset is a gateway to understanding the fabric of California's legal community.
Given its focused scope, this dataset is perfectly poised for niche explorations within the realm of legal analytics. Whether you're a budding data scientist seeking to hone your skills in data cleaning and visualization or an academic looking to analyze the distribution of legal services across different Californian locales, this dataset provides a solid foundation. It's an ideal resource for small-scale predictive modeling, network analysis to explore relationships within the legal community, or even sentiment analysis on the review snippets to gauge client satisfaction across different legal domains.
We're committed to ethical data practices. This dataset was compiled with respect for privacy, consent, and data protection norms, ensuring that all information is publicly available, aggregated with care, and presented with the intention to inform and educate.
Heartfelt thanks go to the platforms that made this endeavor possible. Kaggle, for providing a vibrant community and platform for data science enthusiasts to learn, share, and grow and also the Yellow pages for being platform of the data.
Facebook
TwitterThis collection grew out of a prototype case tracking and crime mapping application that was developed for the United States Attorney's Office (USAO), Southern District of New York (SDNY). The purpose of creating the application was to move from the traditionally episodic way of handling cases to a comprehensive and strategic method of collecting case information and linking it to specific geographic locations, and collecting information either not handled at all or not handled with sufficient enough detail by SDNY's existing case management system. The result was an end-user application designed to be run largely by SDNY's nontechnical staff. It consisted of two components, a database to capture case tracking information and a mapping component to link case and geographic data. The case tracking data were contained in a Microsoft Access database and the client application contained all of the forms, queries, reports, macros, table links, and code necessary to enter, navigate through, and query the data. The mapping application was developed using Environmental Systems Research Institute's (ESRI) ArcView 3.0a GIS. This collection shows how the user-interface of the database and the mapping component were customized to allow the staff to perform spatial queries without having to be geographic information systems (GIS) experts. Part 1 of this collection contains the Visual Basic script used to customize the user-interface of the Microsoft Access database. Part 2 contains the Avenue script used to customize ArcView to link the data maintained in the server databases, to automate the office's most common queries, and to run simple analyses.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Comprehensive dataset containing 27,810 verified Criminal justice attorney businesses in United States with complete contact information, ratings, reviews, and location data.
Facebook
TwitterThe Initiation results data presented here reflects all of the arrests that came through the door of the State's Attorneys Office (SAO). Included in this data set are the defendant counts by age and initiation, their associated offense type, and year. An initiation is how an arrest turns into a “case” in the courts. Most cases are initiated through a process known as felony review, in which SAO attorneys make a decision whether or not to prosecute. Cases may also be indicted by a grand jury or, in narcotics cases, filed directly by law enforcement (labeled "BOND SET (Narcotics)" in this data). Included in this data set are the defendant counts by initiation and year. This data includes felony cases handled by the Criminal, Narcotics, and Special Prosecution Bureaus. It does not include information about cases processed through the Juvenile Justice and Civil Actions Bureaus.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-SA 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Recently verified (1/5/18) list of attorneys in the State of Mississippi. We guaranty our list and will replace any emails that bounce from this list. Whether you are marketing to Mississippi attorneys, looking for a new job, or performing market research our list provides the mailing address, phone, and email address you need to run any kind of campaign. Please send us any questions you have about our list and we will respond shortly. We offer our lists for hundreds, often thousands less than other email list providers. If you are thinking about renting an email list, we offer our lists for sale at nearly the same price as most list rental companies. Why rent when you can buy it for the same price?
Attorney email Lists
attorneys,lawyers,mississippi,email
2871
$99.99
Facebook
TwitterThe Initiation results data presented here reflects all of the arrests that came through the door of the State's Attorneys Office (SAO). Included in this data set are the defendant counts by gender and initiation, their associated offense type, and year.
An initiation is how an arrest turns into a “case” in the courts. Most cases are initiated through a process known as felony review, in which SAO attorneys make a decision whether or not to prosecute. Cases may also be indicted by a grand jury or, in narcotics cases, filed directly by law enforcement (labeled "BOND SET (Narcotics)" in this data). Included in this data set are the defendant counts by initiation and year. This data includes felony cases handled by the Criminal, Narcotics, and Special Prosecution Bureaus. It does not include information about cases processed through the Juvenile Justice and Civil Actions Bureaus.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Comprehensive dataset containing 82,018 verified Law firm businesses in United States with complete contact information, ratings, reviews, and location data.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/studies/34513/termshttps://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/studies/34513/terms
These data are part of NACJD's Fast Track Release and are distributed as they were received from the data depositor. The files have been zipped by NACJD for release, but not checked or processed except for the removal of direct identifiers. Users should refer to the accompanying readme file for a brief description of the files available with this collection and consult the investigator(s) if further information is needed. This study utilized data from the Bureau of Justice Statistics on federal criminal case processing to study jurisdictional variations in prosecutorial decision-making outcomes. It linked information across multiple federal agencies in order to track individual offenders across the various stages of the federal justice system. Specifically, it combined arrest information from the United States Marshall's Service with charging information from the Executive and Administrative Offices of the United States Attorney and with sentencing information from the United States Sentencing Commission. These individual data were subsequently augmented with additional information on federal courts to examine contextual variations in charging decisions across federal jurisdictions. There are three data files. Dataset 1 (Executive Office for United States Attorneys (EOUSA) and United States Marshals Service (USMS) Data) contains 88 variables and 284,869 cases. Dataset 2 (Administrative Office of the United States Courts (AOUSC) and United States Sentencing Commission (USSC) Data) contains 717 variables and 256,598 cases. Dataset 3 (United States District Court Characteristics Data) contains 6 variables and 89 cases. Only Dataset 3 is being released as part of the available study materials. Datasets 1 and 2 can be re-created using the syntax files which are included in the study materials.
Facebook
TwitterThe Initiation results data presented here reflects all of the arrests that came through the door of the State's Attorneys Office (SAO). Included in this data set are the defendant counts by initiation, their associated "topline" charge offense type, and year. An initiation is how an arrest turns into a “case” in the courts. Most cases are initiated through a process known as felony review, in which SAO attorneys make a decision whether or not to prosecute. Cases may also be indicted by a grand jury or, in narcotics cases, filed directly by law enforcement (labeled "BOND SET (Narcotics)" in this data). Included in this data set are the defendant counts by initiation and year. This data includes felony cases handled by the Criminal, Narcotics, and Special Prosecution Bureaus. It does not include information about cases processed through the Juvenile Justice and Civil Actions Bureaus.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Comprehensive dataset containing 61 verified Lawyers Title locations in United States with complete contact information, ratings, reviews, and location data.
Facebook
TwitterU.S. Government Workshttps://www.usa.gov/government-works
License information was derived automatically
The disposition data presented in this report reflects the culmination of the fact-finding process that leads to the resolution of a case. Included in this data set are the defendant counts by disposition, their associated offense type, and year.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Comprehensive dataset containing 39 verified Lawyers association businesses in California, United States with complete contact information, ratings, reviews, and location data.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Comprehensive dataset containing 31,990 verified Family law attorney businesses in United States with complete contact information, ratings, reviews, and location data.
Facebook
TwitterThe 2014 Survey of State Attorneys General (SAG) collected information on jurisdiction, sources and circumstances of case referrals, and the participation of attorneys general offices in federal or state white-collar crime task forces in 2014. White-collar crime was defined by the Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS) as: "any violation of law committed through non-violent means, involving lies, omissions, deceit, misrepresentation, or violation of a position of trust, by an individual or organization for personal or organizational benefit." SAG sought to analyze how attorneys general offices as an organization in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and U.S. territories respond to white-collar offenses in their jurisdiction. BJS asked respondents to focus on the following criminal and civil offenses: bank fraud, consumer fraud, insurance fraud, medical fraud, securities fraud, tax fraud, environmental offenses, false claims and statements, illegal payments to governmental officials (giving or receiving), unfair trade practices, and workplace-related offenses (e.g., unsafe working conditions). Variables included whether or not offices handled criminal or civil cases in the above categories, estimated number of cases in each category, and what types of criminal or civil sanctions were imposed on white-collar offenders. Researchers also assessed collaboration with partners outside of state attorneys offices, whether cases were referred for federal or local prosecution, and what circumstances lead to referring cases to state regulatory agencies. The extent to which state attorneys offices maintain white-collar crime data was also recorded.