Comprehensive dataset of 197 Medical schools in United Kingdom as of July, 2025. Includes verified contact information (email, phone), geocoded addresses, customer ratings, reviews, business categories, and operational details. Perfect for market research, lead generation, competitive analysis, and business intelligence. Download a complimentary sample to evaluate data quality and completeness.

Background: Obesity is a multifaceted condition influenced by genetic, lifestyle, and cultural factors. The prevalence of obesity has risen globally, with distinct challenges faced by South Asian populations in the UK, due to genetic predispositions and dietary shifts. This study evaluated the impact of an educational intervention designed for medical students to increase understanding of obesity in the South Asian community.Approach: Participants were recruited via the medical school online platform and signed written consent forms. The study did not require ethics approval. Participants completed a Likert confidence scale questionnaire before the small group teaching intervention, and then after it, to assess the impact of the session. Written free text comments after the session illustrated participant thoughts on the intervention and how well they felt the medical school taught on ethnic minority health. The dataset is a spreadsheet that records participants' responses to questionnaireEvaluation: The intervention significantly improved participant confidence in understanding and awareness of obesity in the South Asian community. Free text comments highlighted positive engagement and suggested areas for improvement. All participants believed their medical school lacked sufficient teaching on obesity in ethnic minorities and expressed an ardent desire for more teaching in this area.Implications: This study underscores the need for tailored undergraduate medical teaching on obesity in diverse ethnic groups, particularly South Asians. It highlights the inadequacies of a one-size-fits-all approach in addressing obesity within ethnic minority communities. Future work should explore the readiness of medical students across the UK to study obesity and the management of it in ethnic minorities.The data set includes the consent form and feedback form used for the study, as well as anonymised feedback data from the study. The Wilcoxon signed rank test is also included, as well as evidence that an ethics application was not needed for the study.

The doctors of the future need to be empowered to deliver healthcare sustainably while protecting their patients’ health in the context of a degrading environment. This study aimed to objectively review the extent and nature of the teaching of planetary health and sustainability topics in UK medical education. A multi-centre national review of the timetabled teaching sessions in medical courses in the UK during the academic year 2020/2021 against the General Medical Council’s adopted ‘Educating for Sustainable Healthcare – Priority Learning Outcomes’. Medical students were recruited and reviewed the entirety of their own institution’s online teaching materials associated with core teaching sessions using a standardised data collection tool. Learning outcome coverage and estimated teaching time were calculated and used to rank participating medical schools. 45% of eligible UK medical schools were included in the study. The extent of teaching varied considerably amongst courses. Mean coverage of the 13 learning outcomes was 9.9 (SD:2.5) with a mean estimated teaching time of 140 min (SD:139). Courses with dedicated planetary health and sustainability sessions ranked best. There is large disparity in the education that medical students receive on these topics. Teaching may not adequately prioritise sustainability or reflect advances in planetary health knowledge.Practice pointsMedical education on planetary health and sustainability topics varies widely amongst UK medical schools.UK medical education does not necessarily reflect recent advances in planetary health knowledge.Greater educational focus is required on sustainability in healthcare.Centrally mandated teaching on these topics may improve disparity in education.This study’s methodology provides a possible approach for future curriculum evaluations. Practice points Medical education on planetary health and sustainability topics varies widely amongst UK medical schools. UK medical education does not necessarily reflect recent advances in planetary health knowledge. Greater educational focus is required on sustainability in healthcare. Centrally mandated teaching on these topics may improve disparity in education. This study’s methodology provides a possible approach for future curriculum evaluations.

Forecast: Population Per Medical Doctors Graduates in the UK 2024 - 2028 Discover more data with ReportLinker!

This is the coded data from a longitudinal modified ground theory study that examined the experience of failing the medical school final examination. The data codes the experience across 3 time points ie just after failing, just before resitting and when working as a doctor. The data was gather through interviews, coded and stored in a excel database. It has been anonymised. The colour of the text denotes the time the data was collected ie black after starting work and collected from FY doctors who were not followed up longitudinally. In the student cohort just after failing in is green, just before resitting finals is in red and after passing second time and in work in blue.

Background:
The Millennium Cohort Study (MCS) is a large-scale, multi-purpose longitudinal dataset providing information about babies born at the beginning of the 21st century, their progress through life, and the families who are bringing them up, for the four countries of the United Kingdom. The original objectives of the first MCS survey, as laid down in the proposal to the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) in March 2000, were:

• to chart the initial conditions of social, economic and health advantages and disadvantages facing children born at the start of the 21st century, capturing information that the research community of the future will require
• to provide a basis for comparing patterns of development with the preceding cohorts (the National Child Development Study, held at the UK Data Archive under GN 33004, and the 1970 Birth Cohort Study, held under GN 33229)
• to collect information on previously neglected topics, such as fathers' involvement in children's care and development
• to focus on parents as the most immediate elements of the children's 'background', charting their experience as mothers and fathers of newborn babies in the year 2000, recording how they (and any other children in the family) adapted to the newcomer, and what their aspirations for her/his future may be
• to emphasise intergenerational links including those back to the parents' own childhood
• to investigate the wider social ecology of the family, including social networks, civic engagement and community facilities and services, splicing in geo-coded data when available

Additional objectives subsequently included for MCS were:

• to provide control cases for the national evaluation of Sure Start (a government programme intended to alleviate child poverty and social exclusion)
• to provide samples of adequate size to analyse and compare the smaller countries of the United Kingdom, and include disadvantaged areas of England

Further information about the MCS can be found on the Centre for Longitudinal Studies web pages.

The content of MCS studies, including questions, topics and variables can be explored via the CLOSER Discovery website.

The first sweep (MCS1) interviewed both mothers and (where resident) fathers (or father-figures) of infants included in the sample when the babies were nine months old, and the second sweep (MCS2) was carried out with the same respondents when the children were three years of age. The third sweep (MCS3) was conducted in 2006, when the children were aged five years old, the fourth sweep (MCS4) in 2008, when they were seven years old, the fifth sweep (MCS5) in 2012-2013, when they were eleven years old, the sixth sweep (MCS6) in 2015, when they were fourteen years old, and the seventh sweep (MCS7) in 2018, when they were seventeen years old. End User Licence versions of MCS studies:
The End User Licence (EUL) versions of MCS1, MCS2, MCS3, MCS4, MCS5, MCS6 and MCS7 are held under UK Data Archive SNs 4683, 5350, 5795, 6411, 7464, 8156 and 8682 respectively. The longitudinal family file is held under SN 8172.

Sub-sample studies:
Some studies based on sub-samples of MCS have also been conducted, including a study of MCS respondent mothers who had received assisted fertility treatment, conducted in 2003 (see EUL SN 5559). Also, birth registration and maternity hospital episodes for the MCS respondents are held as a separate dataset (see EUL SN 5614).


How to access genetic and/or bio-medical sample data from a range of longitudinal surveys:
For information on how to access biomedical data from MCS that are not held at the UKDS, see the CLS Genetic data and biological samples webpage.

Secure Access datasets:
Secure Access versions of the MCS have more restrictive access conditions than versions available under the standard End User Licence or Special Licence (see 'Access data' tab above).

Secure Access versions of the MCS include:

• detailed sensitive variables not available under EUL. These have been grouped thematically and are held under SN 8753 (socio-economic, accommodation and occupational data), SN 8754 (self-reported health, behaviour and fertility), SN 8755 (demographics, language and religion) and SN 8756 (exact participation dates). These files replace previously available studies held under SNs 8456 and 8622-8627
  
• detailed geographical identifier files which are grouped by sweep held under SN 7758 (MCS1), SN 7759 (MCS2), SN 7760 (MCS3), SN 7761 (MCS4), SN 7762 (MCS5 2001 Census Boundaries), SN 7763 (MCS5 2011 Census Boundaries), SN 8231 (MCS6 2001 Census Boundaries), SN 8232 (MCS6 2011 Census Boundaries), SN 8757 (MCS7), SN 8758 (MCS7 2001 Census Boundaries) and SN 8759 (MCS7 2011 Census Boundaries). These files replace previously available files grouped by geography SN 7049 (Ward level), SN 7050 (Lower Super Output Area level), and SN 7051 (Output Area level)
• linked education administrative datasets for Key Stages 1, 2, 4 and 5 held under SN 8481 (England). This replaces previously available datasets for Key Stage 1 (SN 6862) and Key Stage 2 (SN 7712)
  
• linked education administrative datasets for Key Stage 1 held under SN 7414 (Scotland)
• linked education administrative dataset for Key Stages 1, 2, 3 and 4 under SN 9085 (Wales)
  
• linked NHS Patient Episode Database for Wales (PEDW) for MCS1 – MCS5 held under SN 8302
• linked Scottish Medical Records data held under SNs 8709, 8710, 8711, 8712, 8713 and 8714;
• Banded Distances to English Grammar Schools for MCS5 held under SN 8394
• linked Health Administrative Datasets (Hospital Episode Statistics) for England for years 2000-2019 held under SN 9030
• linked Health Administrative Datasets (SAIL) for Wales held under SN 9310
  
• linked Hospital of Birth data held under SN 5724.

The linked education administrative datasets held under SNs 8481,7414 and 9085 may be ordered alongside the MCS detailed geographical identifier files only if sufficient justification is provided in the application.

Researchers applying for access to the Secure Access MCS datasets should indicate on their ESRC Accredited Researcher application form the EUL dataset(s) that they also wish to access (selected from the MCS Series Access web page).

The MCS Linked Education Administrative Dataset (KS1), Scotland: Secure Access (SN 7414) includes a data file containing selected information from the Pupil Census, 2008, the School Meals Survey and attendance and absence records for the year 2008-2009, for those cohort members attending a school in Scotland at the time of MCS4 interview. Also included are anonymised Local Education Authorities (LEA) and anonymised School Numbers, to allow comparison of results across LEA and school. The data were obtained only for children whose parents/carers gave consent to data linkage, and who were successfully matched.

This study only includes data for MCS cohort members attending schools in Scotland. Data for England and Wales are available under SNs 8481 and 7415 respectively.

The NHS Business Services Authority (NHSBSA) publishes Secondary Care Medicines Data on behalf of NHS England (NHSE). This dataset provides 'Provisional' Secondary Care Medicines data for all NHS Acute, Teaching, Specialist, Mental Health, and Community Trusts in England. It provides information on pharmacy stock control, reflecting processed medicines data. RX Info is responsible for refreshing the Provisional data at the close of each financial year to include backtracking adjustments. The data is 'Finalised' to provide validated and complete figures for each reporting period, incorporating any updates and corrections throughout the year. The Finalised dataset serves as the definitive record for each month and year, offering the most accurate information on medicines issued. While we do not analyse changes, users can compare the finalised data with provisional data to identify any discrepancies. Key Components of the Data Quantities of Medicines Issued: Details the total quantities of medicines stock control via NHS Secondary Care services. Indicative Costs: Actual costs cannot be displayed in the dataset as NHS Hospital pricing contracts and NICE Patient Access Schemes are confidential. The indicative cost of medicines is derived from current medicines pricing data held in NHSBSA data systems (Common Drug Reference and dm+d), calculated to VMP level. Indicative costs are calculated using: Community pharmacy reimbursement prices for generic medicines. List prices for branded medicines. Care should be taken when interpreting and analysing this indicative cost as it does not reflect the net actual cost of NHS Trusts, which will differ due to the application of confidential discounts, rebates, or procurement agreements paid by hospitals when purchasing medicines. Standardisation with SNOMED CT and dm+d: SNOMED CT (Systematised Nomenclature of Medicine - Clinical Terms) is used to enhance the dataset’s compatibility with electronic health record systems and clinical decision support tools. SNOMED CT is a globally recognised coding system that provides precise definitions for clinical terms, ensuring interoperability across healthcare systems. Trust-Level Data: Data is broken down by individual NHS Trusts, enabling regional comparisons, benchmarking, and targeted analysis of specific Trusts. Medicine Identification: Medicines in the dataset are identified using Virtual Medicinal Product (VMP) codes from the Dictionary of Medicines and Devices (dm+d): VMP_PRODUCT_NAME: The name of the Virtual Medicinal Product (VMP) as defined by the dm+d, which includes key details about the product. For example: Paracetamol 500mg tablets. VMP_SNOMED_CODE: The code for the Virtual Medicinal Product (VMP), providing a unique identifier for each product. For example: 42109611000001109 represents Paracetamol 500mg tablets. You can access the finalised files in our Finalised Secondary Care Medicines Data (SCMD) with indicative price dataset. Dataset Details Service Overview Information about our NHSBSA Prescriptions Data service can be found here - Prescription data | NHSBSA The NHS Business Services Authority (NHSBSA) publishes this dataset, provided by RX Info, which contains information about pharmacy stock control in NHS Secondary Care settings across England on behalf of NHS England. It includes data from NHS Trusts and is in a standardised dm+d format (Dictionary of medicines and devices (dm+d) | NHSBSA). For further context about the Secondary Care Medicines Data, you can explore the following resources: Secondary Care Medicines Data Release Guidance v0.5 (Word: 78.3KB) RX Info: RX Info is the provider of the data related to pharmacy stock control medicines issued in NHS Secondary Care settings, which is made available by NHSBSA. Visit RX Info's website for more details. Data Source The data is sourced from NHS Trusts' pharmacy stock control systems which capture detailed records of medicines issued, including quantities. The data is provided to NHSBSA by RX Info, a data provider that supplies records on medicines issued in NHS Secondary Care settings. Data quality controls are in place to exclude transactions flagged as outliers, non-standardised items and zero activity. No personal or patient-identifiable information is included, ensuring compliance with data protection regulations. Rx-Info will provide a complete annual refresh of the data two months after the close of a financial year, planned for the end May, which will then be the fixed data set accounting for backtracking. The data for the finalised view is provided to NHSBSA. Data Collection Data is from NHS England sites only and provided under the agreement entered into by Trusts and Rx-Info (Define) facilitated by NHS England. The data owners and data controllers are the respective NHS Trusts. Time Periods Publication frequency: Data is uploaded on a monthly basis and is published retrospectively with a two-month delay. For example, January data is published in March. Historical Data: Data is available from April 2021 onwards. Geography NHS Trusts in England. Statistical Classification This is not an official statistic. A related official statistic can be found in our Prescribing Costs in Hospitals and the Community publication, which includes Secondary Care Medicines data with actual cost, broken down by British National Formulary (BNF) Section. Caveats Information: Interpreting 'Cost' Data Cost Limitations and Interpretation Indicative Costs: The costs in this dataset are indicative and do not reflect the net actual cost (including discounts and rebates) paid by hospitals when purchasing medicines. Due to confidential procurement agreements, the indicative costs will overestimate total NHS hospital expenditure. These figures are most useful for trend analysis rather than precise cost predictions.

This dataset comprises physician-level entries from the 1906 American Medical Directory, the first in a series of semi-annual directories of all practicing physicians published by the American Medical Association [1]. Physicians are consistently listed by city, county, and state. Most records also include details about the place and date of medical training. From 1906-1940, Directories also identified the race of black physicians [2].This dataset comprises physician entries for a subset of US states and the District of Columbia, including all of the South and several adjacent states (Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, Missouri, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, West Virginia). Records were extracted via manual double-entry by professional data management company [3], and place names were matched to latitude/longitude coordinates. The main source for geolocating physician entries was the US Census. Historical Census records were sourced from IPUMS National Historical Geographic Information System [4]. Additionally, a public database of historical US Post Office locations was used to match locations that could not be found using Census records [5]. Fuzzy matching algorithms were also used to match misspelled place or county names [6].The source of geocoding match is described in the “match.source” field (Type of spatial match (census_YEAR = match to NHGIS census place-county-state for given year; census_fuzzy_YEAR = matched to NHGIS place-county-state with fuzzy matching algorithm; dc = matched to centroid for Washington, DC; post_places = place-county-state matched to Blevins & Helbock's post office dataset; post_fuzzy = matched to post office dataset with fuzzy matching algorithm; post_simp = place/state matched to post office dataset; post_confimed_missing = post office dataset confirms place and county, but could not find coordinates; osm = matched using Open Street Map geocoder; hand-match = matched by research assistants reviewing web archival sources; unmatched/hand_match_missing = place coordinates could not be found). For records where place names could not be matched, but county names could, coordinates for county centroids were used. Overall, 40,964 records were matched to places (match.type=place_point) and 931 to county centroids ( match.type=county_centroid); 76 records could not be matched (match.type=NA).Most records include information about the physician’s medical training, including the year of graduation and a code linking to a school. A key to these codes is given on Directory pages 26-27, and at the beginning of each state’s section [1]. The OSM geocoder was used to assign coordinates to each school by its listed location. Straight-line distances between physicians’ place of training and practice were calculated using the sf package in R [7], and are given in the “school.dist.km” field. Additionally, the Directory identified a handful of schools that were “fraudulent” (school.fraudulent=1), and institutions set up to train black physicians (school.black=1).AMA identified black physicians in the directory with the signifier “(col.)” following the physician’s name (race.black=1). Additionally, a number of physicians attended schools identified by AMA as serving black students, but were not otherwise identified as black; thus an expanded racial identifier was generated to identify black physicians (race.black.prob=1), including physicians who attended these schools and those directly identified (race.black=1).Approximately 10% of dataset entries were audited by trained research assistants, in addition to 100% of black physician entries. These audits demonstrated a high degree of accuracy between the original Directory and extracted records. Still, given the complexity of matching across multiple archival sources, it is possible that some errors remain; any identified errors will be periodically rectified in the dataset, with a log kept of these updates.For further information about this dataset, or to report errors, please contact Dr Ben Chrisinger (Benjamin.Chrisinger@tufts.edu). Future updates to this dataset, including additional states and Directory years, will be posted here: https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataverse/amd.References:1. American Medical Association, 1906. American Medical Directory. American Medical Association, Chicago. Retrieved from: https://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/000543547.2. Baker, Robert B., Harriet A. Washington, Ololade Olakanmi, Todd L. Savitt, Elizabeth A. Jacobs, Eddie Hoover, and Matthew K. Wynia. "African American physicians and organized medicine, 1846-1968: origins of a racial divide." JAMA 300, no. 3 (2008): 306-313. doi:10.1001/jama.300.3.306.3. GABS Research Consult Limited Company, https://www.gabsrcl.com.4. Steven Manson, Jonathan Schroeder, David Van Riper, Tracy Kugler, and Steven Ruggles. IPUMS National Historical Geographic Information System: Version 17.0 [GNIS, TIGER/Line & Census Maps for US Places and Counties: 1900, 1910, 1920, 1930, 1940, 1950; 1910_cPHA: ds37]. Minneapolis, MN: IPUMS. 2022. http://doi.org/10.18128/D050.V17.05. Blevins, Cameron; Helbock, Richard W., 2021, "US Post Offices", https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/NUKCNA, Harvard Dataverse, V1, UNF:6:8ROmiI5/4qA8jHrt62PpyA== [fileUNF]6. fedmatch: Fast, Flexible, and User-Friendly Record Linkage Methods. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/fedmatch/index.html7. sf: Simple Features for R. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/sf/index.html

This data comprises essential guidance provided to clinical placement supervisors involved in a Year 3 MB ChB teaching pilot, where medical students spend a morning on clinical placement in a practice where consultations take place in non-English languages. The afternoon is then spent with students reflecting on their experience in a group session, facilitated by an academic tutor.This data has been requested by the journal, Frontiers in Medicine. They have accepted a paper titled Community Case Study: Mind Your Language: Enhancing Medical Student Learning during Non-English Language ConsultationsThis data set forms a key part of the article

A List of UK Health Workers Who Have Died from COVID-19

Made machine-readable by hand from data from the UK newspaper "The Guardian", in this article: "Doctors, nurses, porters, volunteers: the UK health workers who have died from Covid-19" https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/16/doctors-nurses-porters-volunteers-the-uk-health-workers-who-have-died-from-covid-19

The Guardian is continuing to update the list day-by-day, as the COVID-19 pandemic continues. I do not plan to update this dataset, assuming, since the data collection biases are unknown, that nobody else will find it very interesting. I am not a copyright lawyer and do not know if this data is protected copyright, and if so, in which parts of the world.

Caveat: Creating this dataset from a newspaper article required a lot of hand work. I've done my best, but there may be mistakes.

Columns: Name age institution city: I have filled this in myself; I am ignorant of UK geography and there may well be mistakes date_of_death possible_ppe_issue: mostly blank, but I have filled in "yes" where the article mentions a person who had doubts about the adequacy of PPE (personal protective equipment) MED_SPEC: I have attempted to fill in a medical specialty from the values used on the Eurostat web site for Physicians by Medical Specialty" and "Nursing and caring professionals" tables. The idea is to be able to calculate a fraction of affected individuals by specialty.

About OPCRD

Optimum Patient Care Research Database (OPCRD) is a real-world, longitudinal, research database that provides anonymised data to support scientific, medical, public health and exploratory research. OPCRD is established, funded and maintained by Optimum Patient Care Limited (OPC) – which is a not-for-profit social enterprise that has been providing quality improvement programmes and research support services to general practices across the UK since 2005.

Key Features of OPCRD

OPCRD has been purposefully designed to facilitate real-world data collection and address the growing demand for observational and pragmatic medical research, both in the UK and internationally. Data held in OPCRD is representative of routine clinical care and thus enables the study of ‘real-world’ effectiveness and health care utilisation patterns for chronic health conditions.

OPCRD unique qualities which set it apart from other research data resources: • De-identified electronic medical records of more than 24.9 million patients • OPCRD covers all major UK primary care clinical systems • OPCRD covers approximately 35% of the UK population • One of the biggest primary care research networks in the world, with over 1,175 practices • Linked patient reported outcomes for over 68,000 patients including Covid-19 patient reported data • Linkage to secondary care data sources including Hospital Episode Statistics (HES)

Data Available in OPCRD

OPCRD has received data contributions from over 1,175 practices and currently holds de-identified research ready data for over 24.9 million patients or data subjects. This includes longitudinal primary care patient data and any data relevant to the management of patients in primary care, and thus covers all conditions. The data is derived from both electronic health records (EHR) data and patient reported data from patient questionnaires delivered as part of quality improvement. OPCRD currently holds over 68,000 patient reported questionnaire data on Covid-19, asthma, COPD and rare diseases.

Approvals and Governance

OPCRD has NHS research ethics committee (REC) approval to provide anonymised data for scientific and medical research since 2010, with its most recent approval in 2020 (NHS HRA REC ref: 20/EM/0148). OPCRD is governed by the Anonymised Data Ethics and Protocols Transparency committee (ADEPT). All research conducted using anonymised data from OPCRD must gain prior approval from ADEPT. Proceeds from OPCRD data access fees and detailed feasibility assessments are re-invested into OPC services for the continued free provision of patient quality improvement programmes for contributing practices and patients.

For more information on OPCRD please visit: https://opcrd.co.uk/

An annual survey of medical and dental students which aims to measure the number of students beginning and completing studies in these areas.

This data set consists of anonymous medical student evaluations of both the clinical placement and the group teaching session they attended for the Mind Your Language pilot session for Year 3 students.This data set was provided for an article titled "Community Case Study: Mind Your Language: Enhancing Medical Student Learning during Non-English Language Consultations."This article has been accepted for publication by Frontiers in Medicine.They wanted online access to the anonymous student evaluation, as part of the publication.

This repository stores synthetic datasets derived from the database of the UK Biobank (UKB) cohort.

The datasets were generated for illustrative purposes, in particular for reproducing specific analyses on the health risks associated with long-term exposure to air pollution using the UKB cohort. The code used to create the synthetic datasets is available and documented in a related GitHub repo, with details provided in the section below. These datasets can be freely used for code testing and for illustrating other examples of analyses on the UKB cohort.

Note: while the synthetic versions of the datasets resemble the real ones in several aspects, the users should be aware that these data are fake and must not be used for testing and making inferences on specific research hypotheses. Even more importantly, these data cannot be considered a reliable description of the original UKB data, and they must not be presented as such.

The original datasets are described in the article by Vanoli et al in Epidemiology (2024) (DOI: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001796) [freely available here], which also provides information about the data sources.

The work was supported by the Medical Research Council-UK (Grant ID: MR/Y003330/1).

Content

The series of synthetic datasets (stored in two versions with csv and RDS formats) are the following:

• synthbdcohortinfo: basic cohort information regarding the follow-up period and birth/death dates for 502,360 participants.
• synthbdbasevar: baseline variables, mostly collected at recruitment.
• synthpmdata: annual average exposure to PM_2.5 for each participant reconstructed using their residential history.
• synthoutdeath: death records that occurred during the follow-up with date and ICD-10 code.

In addition, this repository provides these additional files:

• codebook: a pdf file with a codebook for the variables of the various datasets, including references to the fields of the original UKB database.
• asscentre: a csv file with information on the assessment centres used for recruitment of the UKB participants, including code, names, and location (as northing/easting coordinates of the British National Grid).
• Countries_December_2022_GB_BUC: a zip file including the shapefile defining the boundaries of the countries in Great Britain (England, Wales, and Scotland), used for mapping purposes [source].

Generation of the synthetic data

The datasets resemble the real data used in the analysis, and they were generated using the R package synthpop (www.synthpop.org.uk). The generation process involves two steps, namely the synthesis of the main data (cohort info, baseline variables, annual PM_2.5 exposure) and then the sampling of death events. The R scripts for performing the data synthesis are provided in the GitHub repo (subfolder Rcode/synthcode).

The first part merges all the data including the annual PM_2.5 levels in a single wide-format dataset (with a row for each subject), generates a synthetic version, adds fake IDs, and then extracts (and reshapes) the single datasets. In the second part, a Cox proportional hazard model is fitted on the original data to estimate risks associated with various predictors (including the main exposure represented by PM_2.5), and then these relationships are used to simulate death events in each year. Details on the modelling aspects are provided in the article.

This process guarantees that the synthetic data do not hold specific information about the original records, thus preserving confidentiality. At the same time, the multivariate distribution and correlation across variables as well as the mortality risks resemble those of the original data, so the results of descriptive and inferential analyses are similar to those in the original assessments. However, as noted above, the data are used only for illustrative purposes, and they must not be used to test other research hypotheses.

Trust-Level Data: Data is broken down by individual NHS Trusts, enabling regional comparisons, benchmarking, and targeted analysis of specific Trusts. Medicine Identification: Medicines in the dataset are identified using Virtual Medicinal Product (VMP) codes from the Dictionary of Medicines and Devices (dm+d): VMP_PRODUCT_NAME: The name of the Virtual Medicinal Product (VMP) as defined by the dm+d, which includes key details about the product. For example: Paracetamol 500mg tablets. VMP_SNOMED_CODE: The code for the Virtual Medicinal Product (VMP), providing a unique identifier for each product. For example: 42109611000001109 represents Paracetamol 500mg tablets. By making this data publicly available, the NHSBSA aims to enhance transparency, accountability, and the effective use of NHS resources. Overview of Service Information about our NHSBSA Prescriptions Data service can be found here - Prescription data | NHSBSA

Request I believe the above scheme needs to be put in place urgently. Can you please answer the following questions: 1. How many people have applied to you for Ill Health Retirement with Long Covid? 2. How many people have been rejected for Tier One and/or Tier Two levels of IHR when applying with Long Covid? 3. What evidence (listing guidance and research evidence) are being used to reject or confirm applications for IHR with Long Covid? Response Question 1 & 2 A copy of the information is attached. Question 3 Each Scheme Medical Adviser (SMA) is expected to adopt evidence-based practice in arriving at a decision. They do this by combining the following: Medical evidence provided in the Scheme member’s application, Further medical evidence that the SMA may have requested from the Scheme member’s treating healthcare professionals, Information that the employer may have provided in Part A of Form AW33E (e.g. demands of the work duties, any workplace adjustments tried, and the effectiveness of such adjustments), Information that the Scheme member may have provided in Part B of Form AW33E (for example, how long COVID affects them), Current medical literature on long COVID, And the SMA’s occupational health expertise. When assessing ill-health retirement applications from scheme members who have long COVID, the SMA might consult the following guidance and research evidence: • The Society of Occupational Medicine (SOM): ‘Long COVID and Return to Work – What Works?’ (https://www.som.org.uk/sites/som.org.uk/files/Long_COVID_and_Return_to_Work_What_Works_0.pdf) • The Faculty of Occupational Medicine (FOM): ‘Guidance for healthcare professionals on return to work for patients with post-COVID syndrome’ (https://www.fom.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/FOM-Guidance-post-COVID_healthcare-professionals.pdf) • Occupational and Environmental Medicine (academic journal of the FOM: https://oem.bmj.com) • Occupational Medicine (academic journal of the SOM: https://academic.oup.com/occmed?login=false) • Industrial Injuries Advisory Council publication: ‘COVID-19 and Occupational Impacts’ (https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1119955/covid-19-and-occupational-impacts.pdf) • NICE: https://cks.nice.org.uk/topics/long-term-effects-of-coronavirus-long-covid • Nature. An example of a recent publication in this journal is Davis, H., McCorkell, L., Vogel, J. M., & Topol, E. J. (2023). Long covid: major findings, mechanisms and recommendations. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 21(3), 133-146. Full text available at https://www.nature.com/articles/s41579-022-00846-2 • British Medical Journal (BMJ) • Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) • The Lancet • New England Journal of Medicine In summary, the SMA is expected to adopt an individual approach to each case and use careful clinical judgement when applying the medical research literature and guidance to the specific medical circumstances of a Scheme member with long COVID. Data Queries If you have any queries regarding the data provided, or if you plan on publishing the data please contact foirequests@nhsbsa.nhs.uk ensuring you quote the above reference. This is important to ensure that the figures are not misunderstood or misrepresented. If you plan on producing a press or broadcast story based upon the data please contact communicationsteam@nhsbsa.nhs.uk This is important to ensure that the figures are not misunderstood or misrepresented.

BackgroundSleep is a necessary physiological process, which is closely related to cognitive function, emotion, memory, endocrine balance, and immunity. The prevalence of sleep problems continues to rise in Chinese medical students, which has a potential influence on living and work.ObjectiveThis study aimed to observe the prevalence of sleep problems among medical students in China.MethodThe included cross-sectional studies on the prevalence of sleep problems of medical students in China were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, CNKI, and Wanfang database. An 11-item checklist recommended by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality was adopted to evaluate the methodological quality of the included studies. Software Stata 12.0, SPSS 26.0, and R were used to analyze the data. Registration: PROSPERO, CRD 42021237303.ResultThe prevalence of sleep problems among Chinese medical students was 27.38%. The subgroup analysis showed significant differences in the prevalence of sleep problems among different regions, educational backgrounds, grades, and University types. The region, latitude, and gross domestic product (GDP) were significant heterogeneous sources of sleep problems. The prevalence is positively correlated with latitude and negatively correlated with GDP per capita. Regular screening and appropriate intervention are recommended for these mental health problems.Systematic Review Registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021237303, identifier: CRD42021237303.

The dataset contains self-reported patient-level data for adults with chronic kidney disease (CKD) who are under the care of NHS hospital renal centres in England. The data are collected using a survey called 'Your Health Survey' that includes identifiable information, socio-demographic information, a quality of life measure (EQ5D-5L), symptom measure (POS-S Renal) and patient activation measure (PAM). In 2016–2017 over 3,000 Your Health Surveys were collected by the UKRR as part of the quality improvement project ‘Transforming participation in chronic kidney disease’ and in 2018 ‘Transforming participation 2’ used the surveys to measure a coaching intervention in over 200 patients. See here for further information: https://renal.org/audit-research/data-permissions/data/ukrr-ckd-patient-measures-dataset/pam-and-prom-data

Dataset collected over last few months on behalf of the educational project titled " A randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of high-fidelity simulation -based teaching (HFSBT) and video-assisted teaching (VAT) in ECG learning in a cohort of preclinical medical students".