75 datasets found
  1. 🪖 US Military Bases

    • kaggle.com
    zip
    Updated Aug 16, 2023
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    mexwell (2023). 🪖 US Military Bases [Dataset]. https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/mexwell/us-military-bases
    Explore at:
    zip(9955748 bytes)Available download formats
    Dataset updated
    Aug 16, 2023
    Authors
    mexwell
    License

    https://www.usa.gov/government-works/https://www.usa.gov/government-works/

    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    The Military Bases dataset is as of May 21, 2019, and is part of the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT)/Bureau of Transportation Statistics's (BTS's) National Transportation Atlas Database (NTAD). The dataset depicts the authoritative boundaries of the most commonly known Department of Defense (DoD) sites, installations, ranges, and training areas in the United States and Territories. These sites encompass land which is federally owned or otherwise managed. This dataset was created from source data provided by the four Military Service Component headquarters and was compiled by the Defense Installation Spatial Data Infrastructure (DISDI) Program within the Office of the Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Installations and Environment, Business Enterprise Integration Directorate. Sites were selected from the 2010 Base Structure Report (BSR), a summary of the DoD Real Property Inventory. This list does not necessarily represent a comprehensive collection of all Department of Defense facilities, and only those in the fifty United States and US Territories were considered for inclusion. For inventory purposes, installations are comprised of sites, where a site is defined as a specific geographic location of federally owned or managed land and is assigned to military installation. DoD installations are commonly referred to as a base, camp, post, station, yard, center, homeport facility for any ship, or other activity under the jurisdiction, custody, control of the DoD.

    Acknowlegement

    Original Data

    Foto von israel palacio auf Unsplash

  2. 🇺🇸 US Military Demographics

    • kaggle.com
    zip
    Updated Aug 14, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    mexwell (2023). 🇺🇸 US Military Demographics [Dataset]. https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/mexwell/us-military-demographics
    Explore at:
    zip(3574605 bytes)Available download formats
    Dataset updated
    Aug 14, 2023
    Authors
    mexwell
    Description

    This dataset contains demographic information on every member of the US armed forces including gender, race, and rank.

    Acknowlegement

    Original Data

    Foto von israel palacio auf Unsplash

  3. US Military Spending by Year (1960 - 2020)

    • kaggle.com
    zip
    Updated Dec 7, 2021
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Brandon Conrady (2021). US Military Spending by Year (1960 - 2020) [Dataset]. https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/brandonconrady/us-military-spending-by-year-1960-2020
    Explore at:
    zip(1039 bytes)Available download formats
    Dataset updated
    Dec 7, 2021
    Authors
    Brandon Conrady
    License

    https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

    Description

    Content

    Lists the military spending, GDP, and population estimate for the US each year from 1960 to 2020.

    Acknowledgements

    Banner image source: https://unsplash.com/photos/BQgAYwERXhs

  4. US military interventions

    • kaggle.com
    zip
    Updated Jul 12, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Konrad Banachewicz (2023). US military interventions [Dataset]. https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/konradb/us-military-interventions
    Explore at:
    zip(162740 bytes)Available download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jul 12, 2023
    Authors
    Konrad Banachewicz
    License

    Open Database License (ODbL) v1.0https://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    From the project website: "url"> https://sites.tufts.edu/css/mip-research/mip-dataset/

    The Military Intervention Project (MIP) within the Center for Strategic Studies (CSS) seeks to solve the puzzle of US foreign military interventions. It is building a new, comprehensive dataset of all US military interventions from 1776 until 2017 to measure the costs, benefits, and unintended consequences of US military involvements abroad. In other words, this dataset will provide strong empirical evidence regarding the trade-offs of US military interventions – a current hot topic in Congress, the media, and in public opinion. MIP will measure the costs and benefits to US national interests, economic growth, international reputation as well as human rights, democratic, and economic outcomes within the target state, and much more.

  5. public-opendatasoft-xlsx-military-bases-export

    • kaggle.com
    zip
    Updated May 12, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Don D.M. Tadaya (2023). public-opendatasoft-xlsx-military-bases-export [Dataset]. https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/dascient/public-opendatasoft-xlsx-military-bases-export
    Explore at:
    zip(3073347 bytes)Available download formats
    Dataset updated
    May 12, 2023
    Authors
    Don D.M. Tadaya
    Description

    The Military Bases dataset is as of May 21, 2019, and is part of the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT)/Bureau of Transportation Statistics's (BTS's) National Transportation Atlas Database (NTAD). The dataset depicts the authoritative boundaries of the most commonly known Department of Defense (DoD) sites, installations, ranges, and training areas in the United States and Territories. These sites encompass land which is federally owned or otherwise managed. This dataset was created from source data provided by the four Military Service Component headquarters and was compiled by the Defense Installation Spatial Data Infrastructure (DISDI) Program within the Office of the Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Installations and Environment, Business Enterprise Integration Directorate. Sites were selected from the 2010 Base Structure Report (BSR), a summary of the DoD Real Property Inventory. This list does not necessarily represent a comprehensive collection of all Department of Defense facilities, and only those in the fifty United States and US Territories were considered for inclusion. For inventory purposes, installations are comprised of sites, where a site is defined as a specific geographic location of federally owned or managed land and is assigned to military installation. DoD installations are commonly referred to as a base, camp, post, station, yard, center, homeport facility for any ship, or other activity under the jurisdiction, custody, control of the DoD.

  6. t

    VETERAN STATUS - DP02_MAN_ZIP - Dataset - CKAN

    • portal.tad3.org
    Updated Jul 23, 2023
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2023). VETERAN STATUS - DP02_MAN_ZIP - Dataset - CKAN [Dataset]. https://portal.tad3.org/dataset/veteran-status-dp02_man_zip
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 23, 2023
    License

    Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-SA 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    SELECTED SOCIAL CHARACTERISTICS IN THE UNITED STATES VETERAN STATUS - DP02 Universe - Civilian population 18 Year and over Survey-Program - American Community Survey 5-year estimates Years - 2020, 2021, 2022 Veteran status is used to identify people with active duty military service and service in the military Reserves and the National Guard. Veterans are men and women who have served (even for a short time), but are not currently serving, on active duty in the U.S. Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, or the Coast Guard, or who served in the U.S. Merchant Marine during World War II. People who served in the National Guard or Reserves are classified as veterans only if they were ever called or ordered to active duty, not counting the 4-6 months for initial training or yearly summer camps.

  7. Spouses and Children of U.S. Military Personnel: Results from the 2015...

    • catalog.data.gov
    • odgavaprod.ogopendata.com
    • +2more
    Updated Sep 7, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (2025). Spouses and Children of U.S. Military Personnel: Results from the 2015 National Survey on Drug Use and Health [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/spouses-and-children-of-u-s-military-personnel-results-from-the-2015-national-survey-on-dr
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Sep 7, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administrationhttps://www.samhsa.gov/
    Description

    This report presents findings from the 2015 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) with a focus on comparing estimates related to substance use and mental health for military family members (spouses and children) with general population estimates. The numbers of military family members included in the 2015 NSDUH were relatively small. As a consequence, the report focuses on wives aged 18 to 49 and children aged 12 to 17. In the general area of substance use, the report includes estimates for past year use of any illicit substances (marijuana, cocaine in any form including crack, heroin, hallucinogens, inhalants, and methamphetamine and misuse of four categories of prescription drugs -- pain relievers, tranquilizers, stimulants and sedatives), past year cigarette use, past year alcohol use (both any use and binge use), and past year treatment for substance use, including alcohol use. In the general area of mental health, the report includes estimates for any mental illness (AMI) in the past year for wives. For both wives and children, the report includes estimates for past year major depressive episode (MDE) and mental health service use. For children, estimates of mental health service are reported by general treatment setting (e.g., mental health, educational, medical). As additional years of data become available, it will be possible in future reports to include both male and female spouses and to make more detailed comparisons -- for example for more specific types of illicit substances used and for treatment received by setting, by race/ethnicity and for spouses, by employment and educational background.

  8. f

    Data from: Dual use of cigarettes and smokeless tobacco among active duty...

    • datasetcatalog.nlm.nih.gov
    • tandf.figshare.com
    Updated Dec 27, 2021
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Larsen, Stacy L.; Irwin, Scott P.; Lin, Jie; Zhu, Kangmin; Shriver, Craig D.; Soliván-Ortiz, Aida M.; Schneid, Thomas R.; Lee, Sukhyung (2021). Dual use of cigarettes and smokeless tobacco among active duty service members in the US military [Dataset]. https://datasetcatalog.nlm.nih.gov/dataset?q=0000920968
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Dec 27, 2021
    Authors
    Larsen, Stacy L.; Irwin, Scott P.; Lin, Jie; Zhu, Kangmin; Shriver, Craig D.; Soliván-Ortiz, Aida M.; Schneid, Thomas R.; Lee, Sukhyung
    Description

    The high prevalence of dual use of cigarettes and smokeless tobacco is a unique tobacco use behavior in the US military population. However, dual tobacco use has rarely been addressed in active duty populations. We aimed to identify factors contributing to dual tobacco use among active duty service members from Army and Air Force. We also compared age at initiation, duration of use, and amount of use between dual users and exclusive users. The study included 168 exclusive cigarette smokers, 171 exclusive smokeless tobacco users, and 110 dual users. In stepwise logistic regression, smokeless tobacco use among family members (OR = 4.78, 95% CI = 2.05–11.13 for father use vs. no use, OR = 3.39, 95% CI = 1.56–7.37 for other relatives use vs. no use), and deployment history (serving combat unit vs. combat support unit: OR = 4.12, 95% CI = 1.59–10.66; never deployed vs. combat support unit: OR = 3.32, 95% CI = 1.45–7.61) were factors identified to be associated with dual use relative to exclusive cigarette smoking. Cigarette smoking among family members (OR = 1.96, 95% CI = 1.07–3.60 for sibling smoking), high perception of harm using smokeless tobacco (OR = 2.34, 95% CI = 1.29–4.26), secondhand smoke exposure (OR = 4.83, 95% CI = 2.73–8.55), and lower education (associated degree or some college: OR = 2.76, 95% CI = 1.01–7.51; high school of lower: OR = 4.10, 95% CI = 1.45–11.61) were factors associated with dual use relative to exclusive smokeless tobacco use. Compared to exclusive cigarette smokers, dual users started smoking at younger age, smoked cigarettes for longer period, and smoked more cigarettes per day. Our study addressed dual tobacco use behavior in military population and has implications to tobacco control programs in the military.

  9. d

    Department of Defense Numbers for Traumatic Brain Injury

    • catalog.data.gov
    • s.cnmilf.com
    • +1more
    Updated Nov 29, 2020
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Department of Defense Inspector General (2020). Department of Defense Numbers for Traumatic Brain Injury [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/department-of-defense-numbers-for-traumatic-brain-injury
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Nov 29, 2020
    Dataset provided by
    Department of Defense Inspector General
    Description

    This information is designed to provide service members, their families, veterans, the general public, and other concerned citizens with the most comprehensive and accurate figures available regarding diagnosed cases of TBI within the U.S. military. Information is collected from electronic medical records and analyzed by the Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Center in cooperation with the Armed Forces Health Surveillance Center. Numbers for the current year will be updated on a quarterly basis. Other data will be updated annually. At this time, the MHS is unable to provide information regarding cause of injury or location because that information is not available in most medical records. The numbers represent actual medical diagnoses of TBI within the U.S. Military. Other, larger numbers routinely reported in the media must be considered inaccurate because they do not reflect actual medical diagnoses. Many of these larger numbers are developed utilizing sources such as the Post Deployment Health Assessment (PDHA) or Post Deployment Health Reassessment (PDHRA). However, these documents are assessment tools with TBI screening questions and are not diagnostic tools.

  10. d

    Replication Data for: Are the U.S. Military’s Nonpartisan Norms Eroding?

    • dataone.org
    • dataverse.harvard.edu
    Updated Nov 8, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Lythgoe, Trent (2023). Replication Data for: Are the U.S. Military’s Nonpartisan Norms Eroding? [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/SJ9VEU
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Nov 8, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Harvard Dataverse
    Authors
    Lythgoe, Trent
    Description

    The U.S. military’s nonpartisan norms are important for healthy civil-military relations. Some research, however, suggests these norms are weakening. This study examines the evidence for eroding nonpartisan norms by analyzing U.S. military servicemembers’ partisan affiliations and political activism levels from 2008 to 2018. It finds that since 2008, military servicemembers have become more likely to identify as partisans. Servicemembers have also become more politically active than civilians, although this is due to decreasing activism among the American public. It also finds that longer-serving service members have stronger nonpartisan norms, but that newer servicemembers are more politically active than both longer-serving servicemembers and civilians. These findings provide a firmer empirical foundation for previous claims of eroding norms and suggest more research is needed to understand how increased partisanship and political activism impact military readiness and civil-military relations.

  11. Munitions and Explosives of Concern

    • catalog.data.gov
    • s.cnmilf.com
    • +1more
    Updated Jul 11, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    NOAA Office for Coastal Management (Point of Contact) (2025). Munitions and Explosives of Concern [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/munitions-and-explosives-of-concern1
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 11, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administrationhttp://www.noaa.gov/
    Description

    Munitions and explosives of concern (MEC) have been deposited on the seabed of the United States outer continental shelf since World War I. The bulk of these munitions have originated from the U.S. Armed Forces while conducting military training exercises, war-time placement, and disposal and dumping activities. Since 1972 ocean disposal of munitions and other pollutants has been banned by the Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act. Federal and state efforts to mitigate, map, monitor, and sometimes remove these munitions are ongoing. The location of these munitions is generally unknown, and their existence remains a hazard to people and the natural resources within this geography. The term MEC defines a collection of munitions including; a) unexploded ordnance, b) discarded military munitions, and c) munitions constituents that are present in high enough concentrations to pose an explosive hazard. Additional information on the location of MECs can be found in the data and references listed below: Formerly Used Defense Sites Danger Zones and Restricted Areas U.S. Disposal of Chemical Weapons in the Ocean: Background and Issues for Congress, CRS Report for Congress, January 3, 2007 Defense Environmental Programs Annual Report to Congress for Fiscal Year 2009. Chapter 10. Sea Disposal of Military Munitions

  12. 🎖️ Medal of Honor Dataset

    • kaggle.com
    zip
    Updated Aug 14, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    mexwell (2023). 🎖️ Medal of Honor Dataset [Dataset]. https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/mexwell/medal-of-honor-dataset
    Explore at:
    zip(889935 bytes)Available download formats
    Dataset updated
    Aug 14, 2023
    Authors
    mexwell
    License

    http://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/gpl-2.0.en.htmlhttp://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/gpl-2.0.en.html

    Description

    This dataset has records for the awarding of the United States Medal of Honor. The Medal of Honor is the United States of America’s highest military honor, awarded for personal acts of valor above and beyond the call of duty. The medal is awarded by the President of the United States in the name of the U.S. Congress to U.S. military personnel only. There are three versions of the medal, one for the Army, one for the Navy, and one for the Air Force.[5] Personnel of the Marine Corps and Coast Guard receive the Navy version. The dataset was collected from the official military site, and includes records about how the medal was awarded and characteristics of the recipient. Unfortunately, because of the nature of century-old record keeping, many of the records are incomplete. While a very interesting dataset, it does have some missing data.

    Data Dictionary

    KeyList of...CommentExample Value
    deathBoolean$MISSING_FIELDTrue
    nameString$MISSING_FIELD"Sagelhurst, John C."
    awarded.General Order numberInteger$MISSING_FIELD-1
    awarded.accredited toString$MISSING_FIELD""
    awarded.citationString$MISSING_FIELD"Under a heavy fire from the enemy carried off the field a commissioned officer who was severely wounded and also led a charge on the enemy's rifle pits."
    awarded.issuedString$MISSING_FIELD"01/03/1906"
    birth.location nameString$MISSING_FIELD"Buffalo, N.Y."
    metadata.linkString$MISSING_FIELD"http://www.cmohs.org/recipient-detail/1176/sagelhurst-john-c.php"
    military record.companyString$MISSING_FIELD"Company B"
    military record.divisionString$MISSING_FIELD"1st New Jersey Cavalry"
    military record.entered service atString$MISSING_FIELD"Buffalo, N.Y."
    military record.organizationString$MISSING_FIELD"U.S. Army"
    military record.rankString$MISSING_FIELD"Sergeant"
    awarded.date.dayInteger$MISSING_FIELD6
    awarded.date.fullString$MISSING_FIELD"1865-2-6"
    awarded.date.monthInteger$MISSING_FIELD2
    awarded.date.yearInteger$MISSING_FIELD1865
    awarded.location.latitudeInteger$MISSING_FIELD38
    awarded.location.longitudeInteger$MISSING_FIELD-77
    awarded.location.nameString$MISSING_FIELD"Hatchers Run Court, Stafford, VA 22554, USA"
    birth.date.dayInteger$MISSING_FIELD-1
    birth.date.monthInteger$MISSING_FIELD-1
    birth.date.yearInteger$MISSING_FIELD-1

    Acknowledgement

    Original Data

    CORGIS Dataset Project

    Foto von Samuel Branch auf Unsplash

  13. USA SPENDING EDUCATION CH32 B120 POST-VIETNAM ERA VETERANS' EDUCATIONAL...

    • catalog.data.gov
    • data.va.gov
    • +2more
    Updated Dec 2, 2020
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Department of Veterans Affairs (2020). USA SPENDING EDUCATION CH32 B120 POST-VIETNAM ERA VETERANS' EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE FY2019 [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/usa-spending-education-ch32-b120-post-vietnam-era-veterans-educational-assistance-fy2019
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Dec 2, 2020
    Dataset provided by
    United States Department of Veterans Affairshttp://va.gov/
    Area covered
    Vietnam
    Description

    VBA EDUCATION BENEFITS PROGRAM to provide educational assistance to persons entering the Armed Forces after December 31, 1976, and before July 1, 1985; to assist persons in obtaining an education they might otherwise not be able to afford; and to promote and assist the all volunteer military program of the United States by attracting qualified persons to serve in the Armed Forces. The participant must have entered on active duty on or after January 1, 1977, and before July 1, 1985, and either served on active duty for more than 180 continuous days receiving an other than dishonorable discharge, or have been discharged after January, 1, 1977 because of a service-connected disability. Also eligible are participants who serve for more than 180 days and who continue on active duty and have completed their first period of obligated service (or 6 years of active duty, whichever comes first). Participants must also have satisfactorily contributed to the program. (Satisfactory contribution consists of monthly deduction of $25 to $100 from military pay, up to a maximum of $2,700, for deposit in a special training fund.) Participants may make lump-sum contributions. No individuals on active duty in the Armed Forces may initially begin contributing to this program after March 31, 1987.

  14. H

    County Buddy: A Companion Dataset for Socioeconomic Data Analysis and...

    • dataverse.harvard.edu
    • search.dataone.org
    Updated Jul 29, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Colin Vu; Clio Andris; Leila Baniassad (2025). County Buddy: A Companion Dataset for Socioeconomic Data Analysis and Exploration of U.S. Datasets [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/V7LNJK
    Explore at:
    CroissantCroissant is a format for machine-learning datasets. Learn more about this at mlcommons.org/croissant.
    Dataset updated
    Jul 29, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Harvard Dataverse
    Authors
    Colin Vu; Clio Andris; Leila Baniassad
    License

    CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Time period covered
    Jan 1, 2017 - Dec 31, 2020
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    County Buddy is a dataset detailing the presence, count, and institutions of special populations (incarcerated individuals, college students, military personnel, and Native Americans) at the U.S. county and census tract levels. It offers geographic and demographic context to help explain variation in socio-economic indicators like life expectancy, income, and education.

  15. a

    Correctional Institutions

    • hub.arcgis.com
    • nconemap.gov
    • +2more
    Updated Dec 30, 2009
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    NC OneMap / State of North Carolina (2009). Correctional Institutions [Dataset]. https://hub.arcgis.com/maps/nconemap::correctional-institutions
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Dec 30, 2009
    Dataset authored and provided by
    NC OneMap / State of North Carolina
    License

    https://www.nconemap.gov/pages/termshttps://www.nconemap.gov/pages/terms

    Area covered
    Description

    Jails and Prisons (Correctional Institutions). The Jails and Prisons sub-layer is part of the Emergency Law Enforcement Sector and the Critical Infrastructure Category. A Jail or Prison consists of any facility or location where individuals are regularly and lawfully detained against their will. This includes Federal and State prisons, local jails, and juvenile detention facilities, as well as law enforcement temporary holding facilities. Work camps, including camps operated seasonally, are included if they otherwise meet the definition. A Federal Prison is a facility operated by the Federal Bureau of Prisons for the incarceration of individuals. A State Prison is a facility operated by a state, commonwealth, or territory of the US for the incarceration of individuals for a term usually longer than 1 year. A Juvenile Detention Facility is a facility for the incarceration of those who have not yet reached the age of majority (usually 18 years). A Local Jail is a locally administered facility that holds inmates beyond arraignment (usually 72 hours) and is staffed by municipal or county employees. A temporary holding facility, sometimes referred to as a "police lock up" or "drunk tank", is a facility used to detain people prior to arraignment. Locations that are administrative offices only are excluded from the dataset. This definition of Jails is consistent with that used by the Department of Justice (DOJ) in their "National Jail Census", with the exception of "temporary holding facilities", which the DOJ excludes. Locations which function primarily as law enforcement offices are included in this dataset if they have holding cells. If the facility is enclosed with a fence, wall, or structure with a gate around the buildings only, the locations were depicted as "on entity" at the center of the facility. If the facility's buildings are not enclosed, the locations were depicted as "on entity" on the main building or "block face" on the correct street segment. Personal homes, administrative offices, and temporary locations are intended to be excluded from this dataset; however, some personal homes of constables are included due to the fact that many constables work out of their homes. TGS has made a concerted effort to include all correctional institutions. This dataset includes non license restricted data from the following federal agencies: Bureau of Indian Affairs; Bureau of Reclamation; U.S. Park Police; Federal Bureau of Prisons; Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives; U.S. Marshals Service; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; National Park Service; U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement; and U.S. Customs and Border Protection. This dataset is comprised completely of license free data. The Law Enforcement dataset and the Correctional Institutions dataset were merged into one working file. TGS processed as one file and then separated for delivery purposes. With the merge of the Law Enforcement and the Correctional Institutions datasets, NAICS Codes & Descriptions were assigned based on the facility's main function which was determined by the entity's name, facility type, web research, and state supplied data. In instances where the entity's primary function is both law enforcement and corrections, the NAICS Codes and Descriptions are assigned based on the dataset in which the record is located (i.e., a facility that serves as both a Sheriff's Office and as a jail is designated as [NAICSDESCR]="SHERIFFS' OFFICES (EXCEPT COURT FUNCTIONS ONLY)" in the Law Enforcement layer and as [NAICSDESCR]="JAILS (EXCEPT PRIVATE OPERATION OF)" in the Correctional Institutions layer). Records with "-DOD" appended to the end of the [NAME] value are located on a military base, as defined by the Defense Installation Spatial Data Infrastructure (DISDI) military installations and military range boundaries. "#" and "*" characters were automatically removed from standard fields that TGS populated. Double spaces were replaced by single spaces in these same fields. Text fields in this dataset have been set to all upper case to facilitate consistent database engine search results. All diacritics (e.g., the German umlaut or the Spanish tilde) have been replaced with their closest equivalent English character to facilitate use with database systems that may not support diacritics. The currentness of this dataset is indicated by the [CONTDATE] field. Based on the values in this field, the oldest record dates from 12/07/2004 and the newest record dates from 10/22/2009

  16. m

    Science Applications International Corporation Common Stock -...

    • macro-rankings.com
    csv, excel
    Updated Oct 3, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    macro-rankings (2025). Science Applications International Corporation Common Stock - Capital-Expenditures [Dataset]. https://www.macro-rankings.com/markets/stocks/saic-nasdaq/cashflow-statement/capital-expenditures
    Explore at:
    csv, excelAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Oct 3, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    macro-rankings
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    Capital-Expenditures Time Series for Science Applications International Corporation Common Stock. Science Applications International Corporation provides technical, engineering, and enterprise information technology (IT) services in the United States. It operates in two segments, Defense and Intelligence, and Civilian. The company offers IT modernization services for defense, intelligence, and civilian agencies; digital engineering services; artificial intelligence solutions; weapon systems support for the U.S. military; training and simulation; and ground vehicles support services for the nation's armed forces. It serves military forces, including the army, air force, navy, marines, coast guard, and space force; agencies of the Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, U.S. Department of State, Department of Justice, and Department of Homeland Security; and members of the Intelligence Community, as well as civilian markets, such as federal, state, and local governments. The company was formerly known as SAIC Gemini, Inc. and changed its name to Science Applications International Corporation in September 2013. Science Applications International Corporation was founded in 1969 and is headquartered in Reston, Virginia.

  17. u

    HSIP Correctional Institutions in New Mexico

    • gstore.unm.edu
    • s.cnmilf.com
    • +1more
    Updated Feb 4, 2010
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2010). HSIP Correctional Institutions in New Mexico [Dataset]. https://gstore.unm.edu/apps/rgis/datasets/dde58619-f4c3-4b52-b952-d41bda94aa35/metadata/ISO-19115:2003.html
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Feb 4, 2010
    Time period covered
    Dec 27, 2004
    Area covered
    New Mexico, West Bound -108.757727502132 East Bound -103.126971544366 North Bound 36.9051507970466 South Bound 31.7845116518986
    Description

    Jails and Prisons (Correctional Institutions). The Jails and Prisons sub-layer is part of the Emergency Law Enforcement Sector and the Critical Infrastructure Category. A Jail or Prison consists of any facility or location where individuals are regularly and lawfully detained against their will. This includes Federal and State prisons, local jails, and juvenile detention facilities, as well as law enforcement temporary holding facilities. Work camps, including camps operated seasonally, are included if they otherwise meet the definition. A Federal Prison is a facility operated by the Federal Bureau of Prisons for the incarceration of individuals. A State Prison is a facility operated by a state, commonwealth, or territory of the US for the incarceration of individuals for a term usually longer than 1 year. A Juvenile Detention Facility is a facility for the incarceration of those who have not yet reached the age of majority (usually 18 years). A Local Jail is a locally administered facility that holds inmates beyond arraignment (usually 72 hours) and is staffed by municipal or county employees. A temporary holding facility, sometimes referred to as a "police lock up" or "drunk tank", is a facility used to detain people prior to arraignment. Locations that are administrative offices only are excluded from the dataset. This definition of Jails is consistent with that used by the Department of Justice (DOJ) in their "National Jail Census", with the exception of "temporary holding facilities", which the DOJ excludes. Locations which function primarily as law enforcement offices are included in this dataset if they have holding cells. If the facility is enclosed with a fence, wall, or structure with a gate around the buildings only, the locations were depicted as "on entity" at the center of the facility. If the facility's buildings are not enclosed, the locations were depicted as "on entity" on the main building or "block face" on the correct street segment. Personal homes, administrative offices, and temporary locations are intended to be excluded from this dataset. TGS has made a concerted effort to include all correctional institutions. This dataset includes non license restricted data from the following federal agencies: Bureau of Indian Affairs; Bureau of Reclamation; U.S. Park Police; Federal Bureau of Prisons; Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives; U.S. Marshals Service; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; National Park Service; U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement; and U.S. Customs and Border Protection. This dataset is comprised completely of license free data. The Law Enforcement dataset and the Correctional Institutions dataset were merged into one working file. TGS processed as one file and then separated for delivery purposes. With the merge of the Law Enforcement and the Correctional Institutions datasets, NAICS Codes & Descriptions were assigned based on the facility's main function which was determined by the entity's name, facility type, web research, and state supplied data. In instances where the entity's primary function is both law enforcement and corrections, the NAICS Codes and Descriptions are assigned based on the dataset in which the record is located (i.e., a facility that serves as both a Sheriff's Office and as a jail is designated as [NAICSDESCR]="SHERIFFS' OFFICES (EXCEPT COURT FUNCTIONS ONLY)" in the Law Enforcement layer and as [NAICSDESCR]="JAILS (EXCEPT PRIVATE OPERATION OF)" in the Correctional Institutions layer). Records with "-DOD" appended to the end of the [NAME] value are located on a military base, as defined by the Defense Installation Spatial Data Infrastructure (DISDI) military installations and military range boundaries. "#" and "*" characters were automatically removed from standard fields that TGS populated. Double spaces were replaced by single spaces in these same fields. Text fields in this dataset have been set to all upper case to facilitate consistent database engine search results. All diacritics (e.g., the German umlaut or the Spanish tilde) have been replaced with their closest equivalent English character to facilitate use with database systems that may not support diacritics. The currentness of this dataset is indicated by the [CONTDATE] field. Based on the values in this field, the oldest record dates from 12/27/2004 and the newest record dates from 09/08/2009

  18. Data from: ANSUR II

    • kaggle.com
    zip
    Updated Feb 7, 2020
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    SK (2020). ANSUR II [Dataset]. https://www.kaggle.com/seshadrikolluri/ansur-ii
    Explore at:
    zip(13023451 bytes)Available download formats
    Dataset updated
    Feb 7, 2020
    Authors
    SK
    License

    https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

    Description

    ANSUR 2 (2012)

    A public dataset drawn from the 2012 U.S. Army Anthropometric Survey. This sample is improved in all respects from the ANSUR 88 study and should be used in place of ANSUR 88. Note that this military population is not likely to be representative of any particular user population, but remains valuable because of the ability to explore interrelationships among the variables.

    References:

    1. http://mreed.umtri.umich.edu/mreed/downloads.html
  19. d

    Executive Agreements Database, Statement Regarding the Agreement with The...

    • search.dataone.org
    • dataverse.harvard.edu
    Updated Nov 19, 2023
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Oona A. Hathaway; Curtis A. Bradley; Jack L. Goldsmith (2023). Executive Agreements Database, Statement Regarding the Agreement with The Dominican Republic Concerning Health Care For Military Members and Their Dependents Signed At Washington March 15 and 23, 2006 Entered Into Force June 21, 2006 [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/KBYWZN
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Nov 19, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Harvard Dataverse
    Authors
    Oona A. Hathaway; Curtis A. Bradley; Jack L. Goldsmith
    Description

    KAV 8711 cover memo. Visit https://dataone.org/datasets/sha256%3Ac7ba852f5dce20698238c242df5dc8e596d394ee21ee01abc8efda6ccddaeb92 for complete metadata about this dataset.

  20. g

    Data from: 2015 U.S. Transgender Survey (USTS)

    • datasearch.gesis.org
    Updated May 22, 2019
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    James, Sandy E.; Herman, Jody; Keisling, Mara; Mottet, Lisa; Anafi, Ma'ayan (2019). 2015 U.S. Transgender Survey (USTS) [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR37229
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    May 22, 2019
    Dataset provided by
    da|ra (Registration agency for social science and economic data)
    Authors
    James, Sandy E.; Herman, Jody; Keisling, Mara; Mottet, Lisa; Anafi, Ma'ayan
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    The 2015 U.S. Transgender Survey (USTS) was conducted by the National Center for Transgender Equality (NCTE) to examine the experiences of transgender adults in the United States. The USTS questionnaire was administered online and data were collected over a 34-day period in the summer of 2015, between August 19 and September 21. The final sample included respondents from all fifty states, the District of Columbia, American Samoa, Guam, Puerto Rico, and U.S. military bases overseas. The USTS Public Use Dataset (PUDS) features survey results from 27,715 respondents and details the experiences of transgender people across a wide range of areas, such as education, employment, family life, health, housing, and interactions with police and prisons. The survey instrument had thirty-two sections that covered a broad array of topics, including questions related to the following topics (in alphabetical order): accessing restrooms; airport security; civic participation; counseling; family and peer support; health and health insurance; HIV; housing and homelessness; identity documents; immigration; intimate partner violence; military service; police and incarceration; policy priorities; public accommodations; sex work; sexual assault; substance use; suicidal thoughts and behaviors; unequal treatment, harassment, and physical attack; and voting. Demographic information includes age, racial and ethnic identity, sex assigned at birth, gender and preferred pronouns, sexual orientation, language(s) spoken at home, education, employment, income, religion/spirituality, and marital status.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
mexwell (2023). 🪖 US Military Bases [Dataset]. https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/mexwell/us-military-bases
Organization logo

🪖 US Military Bases

Authoritative boundaries of the most commonly known DoD sites

Explore at:
zip(9955748 bytes)Available download formats
Dataset updated
Aug 16, 2023
Authors
mexwell
License

https://www.usa.gov/government-works/https://www.usa.gov/government-works/

Area covered
United States
Description

The Military Bases dataset is as of May 21, 2019, and is part of the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT)/Bureau of Transportation Statistics's (BTS's) National Transportation Atlas Database (NTAD). The dataset depicts the authoritative boundaries of the most commonly known Department of Defense (DoD) sites, installations, ranges, and training areas in the United States and Territories. These sites encompass land which is federally owned or otherwise managed. This dataset was created from source data provided by the four Military Service Component headquarters and was compiled by the Defense Installation Spatial Data Infrastructure (DISDI) Program within the Office of the Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Installations and Environment, Business Enterprise Integration Directorate. Sites were selected from the 2010 Base Structure Report (BSR), a summary of the DoD Real Property Inventory. This list does not necessarily represent a comprehensive collection of all Department of Defense facilities, and only those in the fifty United States and US Territories were considered for inclusion. For inventory purposes, installations are comprised of sites, where a site is defined as a specific geographic location of federally owned or managed land and is assigned to military installation. DoD installations are commonly referred to as a base, camp, post, station, yard, center, homeport facility for any ship, or other activity under the jurisdiction, custody, control of the DoD.

Acknowlegement

Original Data

Foto von israel palacio auf Unsplash

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu