Context

An education company named X Education sells online courses to industry professionals. On any given day, many professionals who are interested in the courses land on their website and browse for courses.

The company markets its courses on several websites and search engines like Google. Once these people land on the website, they might browse the courses or fill up a form for the course or watch some videos. When these people fill up a form providing their email address or phone number, they are classified to be a lead. Moreover, the company also gets leads through past referrals. Once these leads are acquired, employees from the sales team start making calls, writing emails, etc. Through this process, some of the leads get converted while most do not. The typical lead conversion rate at X education is around 30%.

Now, although X Education gets a lot of leads, its lead conversion rate is very poor. For example, if, say, they acquire 100 leads in a day, only about 30 of them are converted. To make this process more efficient, the company wishes to identify the most potential leads, also known as ‘Hot Leads’. If they successfully identify this set of leads, the lead conversion rate should go up as the sales team will now be focusing more on communicating with the potential leads rather than making calls to everyone.

There are a lot of leads generated in the initial stage (top) but only a few of them come out as paying customers from the bottom. In the middle stage, you need to nurture the potential leads well (i.e. educating the leads about the product, constantly communicating, etc. ) in order to get a higher lead conversion.

X Education wants to select the most promising leads, i.e. the leads that are most likely to convert into paying customers. The company requires you to build a model wherein you need to assign a lead score to each of the leads such that the customers with higher lead score h have a higher conversion chance and the customers with lower lead score have a lower conversion chance. The CEO, in particular, has given a ballpark of the target lead conversion rate to be around 80%.

Content

Variables Description * Prospect ID - A unique ID with which the customer is identified. * Lead Number - A lead number assigned to each lead procured. * Lead Origin - The origin identifier with which the customer was identified to be a lead. Includes API, Landing Page Submission, etc. * Lead Source - The source of the lead. Includes Google, Organic Search, Olark Chat, etc. * Do Not Email -An indicator variable selected by the customer wherein they select whether of not they want to be emailed about the course or not. * Do Not Call - An indicator variable selected by the customer wherein they select whether of not they want to be called about the course or not. * Converted - The target variable. Indicates whether a lead has been successfully converted or not. * TotalVisits - The total number of visits made by the customer on the website. * Total Time Spent on Website - The total time spent by the customer on the website. * Page Views Per Visit - Average number of pages on the website viewed during the visits. * Last Activity - Last activity performed by the customer. Includes Email Opened, Olark Chat Conversation, etc. * Country - The country of the customer. * Specialization - The industry domain in which the customer worked before. Includes the level 'Select Specialization' which means the customer had not selected this option while filling the form. * How did you hear about X Education - The source from which the customer heard about X Education. * What is your current occupation - Indicates whether the customer is a student, umemployed or employed. * What matters most to you in choosing this course An option selected by the customer - indicating what is their main motto behind doing this course. * Search - Indicating whether the customer had seen the ad in any of the listed items. * Magazine
* Newspaper Article * X Education Forums
* Newspaper * Digital Advertisement * Through Recommendations - Indicates whether the customer came in through recommendations. * Receive More Updates About Our Courses - Indicates whether the customer chose to receive more updates about the courses. * Tags - Tags assigned to customers indicating the current status of the lead. * Lead Quality - Indicates the quality of lead based on the data and intuition the employee who has been assigned to the lead. * Update me on Supply Chain Content - Indicates whether the customer wants updates on the Supply Chain Content. * Get updates on DM Content - Indicates whether the customer wants updates on the DM Content. * Lead Profile - A lead level assigned to each customer based on their profile. * City - The city of the customer. * Asymmetric Activity Index - An index and score assigned to each customer based on their activity and their profile * Asymmetric Profile Index * Asymmetric Activity Score * Asymmetric Profile Score
* I agree to pay the amount through cheque - Indicates whether the customer has agreed to pay the amount through cheque or not. * a free copy of Mastering The Interview - Indicates whether the customer wants a free copy of 'Mastering the Interview' or not. * Last Notable Activity - The last notable activity performed by the student.

Acknowledgements

UpGrad Case Study

Inspiration

Your data will be in front of the world's largest data science community. What questions do you want to see answered?

Source:

Mariusz Šapczyński, Cracow University of Economics, Poland, lapczynm '@' uek.krakow.pl Sylwester Białowąs, Poznan University of Economics and Business, Poland, sylwester.bialowas '@' ue.poznan.pl

Data Set Information:

The dataset contains information on clickstream from online store offering clothing for pregnant women. Data are from five months of 2008 and include, among others, product category, location of the photo on the page, country of origin of the IP address and product price in US dollars.

Attribute Information:

The dataset contains 14 variables described in a separate file (See 'Data set description')

Relevant Papers:

N/A

Citation Request:

If you use this dataset, please cite:

Šapczyński M., Białowąs S. (2013) Discovering Patterns of Users' Behaviour in an E-shop - Comparison of Consumer Buying Behaviours in Poland and Other European Countries, “Studia Ekonomiczne†, nr 151, “La société de l'information : perspective européenne et globale : les usages et les risques d'Internet pour les citoyens et les consommateurs†, p. 144-153

Data description ìe-shop clothing 2008î

Variables:

1. YEAR (2008)

========================================================

2. MONTH -> from April (4) to August (8)

========================================================

3. DAY -> day number of the month

========================================================

4. ORDER -> sequence of clicks during one session

========================================================

5. COUNTRY -> variable indicating the country of origin of the IP address with the

following categories:

1-Australia 2-Austria 3-Belgium 4-British Virgin Islands 5-Cayman Islands 6-Christmas Island 7-Croatia 8-Cyprus 9-Czech Republic 10-Denmark 11-Estonia 12-unidentified 13-Faroe Islands 14-Finland 15-France 16-Germany 17-Greece 18-Hungary 19-Iceland 20-India 21-Ireland 22-Italy 23-Latvia 24-Lithuania 25-Luxembourg 26-Mexico 27-Netherlands 28-Norway 29-Poland 30-Portugal 31-Romania 32-Russia 33-San Marino 34-Slovakia 35-Slovenia 36-Spain 37-Sweden 38-Switzerland 39-Ukraine 40-United Arab Emirates 41-United Kingdom 42-USA 43-biz (.biz) 44-com (.com) 45-int (.int) 46-net (.net) 47-org (*.org)

========================================================

6. SESSION ID -> variable indicating session id (short record)

========================================================

7. PAGE 1 (MAIN CATEGORY) -> concerns the main product category:

1-trousers 2-skirts 3-blouses 4-sale

========================================================

8. PAGE 2 (CLOTHING MODEL) -> contains information about the code for each product

(217 products)

========================================================

9. COLOUR -> colour of product

1-beige 2-black 3-blue 4-brown 5-burgundy 6-gray 7-green 8-navy blue 9-of many colors 10-olive 11-pink 12-red 13-violet 14-white

========================================================

10. LOCATION -> photo location on the page, the screen has been divided into six parts:

1-top left 2-top in the middle 3-top right 4-bottom left 5-bottom in the middle 6-bottom right

========================================================

11. MODEL PHOTOGRAPHY -> variable with two categories:

1-en face 2-profile

========================================================

12. PRICE -> price in US dollars

========================================================

13. PRICE 2 -> variable informing whether the price of a particular product is higher than

the average price for the entire product category

1-yes 2-no

========================================================

14. PAGE -> page number within the e-store website (from 1 to 5)

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Ghana number dataset has accurate numbers attached with verified through our team. These client contact data belong to active users only. In fact, these things make it a valuable marketing resource. Whether your business is new or old, you can boost your reach and connect to a large audience with this database. Again, you will find many people who have an interest in your products and will accept from you. Moreover, the Ghana number dataset will support you make your brand more renowned. In other words, by becoming a known brand in the market, you can increase your brand value greatly. Similarly, many people will show interest in your products and services. However, the contacts on this mobile number list are active and real. Yet, you will benefit greatly if you purchase this cheap but valuable database. Ghana phone data can be a great solution for SMS and telemarketing. Anyone can use the contact lead here to reach different people in this area. Ghana phone data allows you to give product details with your messages to make them more appealing and reliable. Your product quality and content will catch the attention of the interested audience. This will create more traffic and you can reach sales from there. Likewise, the Ghana phone data is an opt-in and permission-based contact list. In addition, with an affordable yet fresh list like ours, your marketing will be more effective. People can now relate to your business more after you successfully use this tool. Thus, order the contact library now from List To Data to promote your goods and services everywhere inside the country. Ghana phone number list is a massive database. Our team promises you sincere service and active support. In general, you can contact us anytime on our website if you face any problems with our list. Our support team will solve the problem for you, thus you don’t have to worry about not obtaining the worth of your money. Further, the Ghana phone number list will aid your business in many new ways. The benefits of marketing on SMS marketing are enormous as we all know very well. Moreover, no one wants to miss out on such a huge and versatile audience in Ghana. Hence, purchasing this contact number package will be a gem for any business any day.

Datasets in this publication report the number of diagnoses with coronavirus disease (COVID-19) based on RIVM reports in The Netherlands. Since 3 March, RIVM reports the number of diagnoses with the coronavirus and their municipality of residence on a daily base. The data contains the total number of positively tested patients. It is not a dataset with the current number of sick people in the Netherlands. The RIVM does not currently provide data on people who have been cured. RIVM provides daily updates of the data. The data is not stored in a persistent way and is updated on the fly. RIVM removes data from previous days from their website. Therefore, it is not possible to monitor the spread of the coronavirus disease in the Netherlands on this data standalone. The data in this publication is composed of hourly downloads of the data of the website of RIVM. All code to compose the data was found on https://github.com/J535D165/CoronaWatchNL as well as graphs based on the data.

Datasets in this publication report the number of diagnoses with coronavirus disease (COVID-19) based on RIVM reports in The Netherlands. Since 3 March, RIVM reports the number of diagnoses with the coronavirus and their municipality of residence on a daily base. The data contains the total number of positively tested patients. It is not a dataset with the current number of sick people in the Netherlands. The RIVM does not currently provide data on people who have been cured.

RIVM provides daily updates of the data. The data is not stored in a persistent way and is updated on the fly. RIVM removes data from previous days from their website. Therefore, it is not possible to monitor the spread of the coronavirus disease in the Netherlands on this data standalone. The data in this publication is composed of hourly downloads of the data of the website of RIVM. All code to compose the data was found on https://github.com/J535D165/CoronaWatchNL as well as graphs based on the data.

Reporting of Aggregate Case and Death Count data was discontinued May 11, 2023, with the expiration of the COVID-19 public health emergency declaration. Although these data will continue to be publicly available, this dataset will no longer be updated.

This archived public use dataset has 11 data elements reflecting United States COVID-19 community levels for all available counties.

The COVID-19 community levels were developed using a combination of three metrics — new COVID-19 admissions per 100,000 population in the past 7 days, the percent of staffed inpatient beds occupied by COVID-19 patients, and total new COVID-19 cases per 100,000 population in the past 7 days. The COVID-19 community level was determined by the higher of the new admissions and inpatient beds metrics, based on the current level of new cases per 100,000 population in the past 7 days. New COVID-19 admissions and the percent of staffed inpatient beds occupied represent the current potential for strain on the health system. Data on new cases acts as an early warning indicator of potential increases in health system strain in the event of a COVID-19 surge.

Using these data, the COVID-19 community level was classified as low, medium, or high.

COVID-19 Community Levels were used to help communities and individuals make decisions based on their local context and their unique needs. Community vaccination coverage and other local information, like early alerts from surveillance, such as through wastewater or the number of emergency department visits for COVID-19, when available, can also inform decision making for health officials and individuals.

For the most accurate and up-to-date data for any county or state, visit the relevant health department website. COVID Data Tracker may display data that differ from state and local websites. This can be due to differences in how data were collected, how metrics were calculated, or the timing of web updates.

Archived Data Notes:

This dataset was renamed from "United States COVID-19 Community Levels by County as Originally Posted" to "United States COVID-19 Community Levels by County" on March 31, 2022.

March 31, 2022: Column name for county population was changed to “county_population”. No change was made to the data points previous released.

March 31, 2022: New column, “health_service_area_population”, was added to the dataset to denote the total population in the designated Health Service Area based on 2019 Census estimate.

March 31, 2022: FIPS codes for territories American Samoa, Guam, Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and United States Virgin Islands were re-formatted to 5-digit numeric for records released on 3/3/2022 to be consistent with other records in the dataset.

March 31, 2022: Changes were made to the text fields in variables “county”, “state”, and “health_service_area” so the formats are consistent across releases.

March 31, 2022: The “%” sign was removed from the text field in column “covid_inpatient_bed_utilization”. No change was made to the data. As indicated in the column description, values in this column represent the percentage of staffed inpatient beds occupied by COVID-19 patients (7-day average).

March 31, 2022: Data values for columns, “county_population”, “health_service_area_number”, and “health_service_area” were backfilled for records released on 2/24/2022. These columns were added since the week of 3/3/2022, thus the values were previously missing for records released the week prior.

April 7, 2022: Updates made to data released on 3/24/2022 for Guam, Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and United States Virgin Islands to correct a data mapping error.

April 21, 2022: COVID-19 Community Level (CCL) data released for counties in Nebraska for the week of April 21, 2022 have 3 counties identified in the high category and 37 in the medium category. CDC has been working with state officials to verify the data submitted, as other data systems are not providing alerts for substantial increases in disease transmission or severity in the state.

May 26, 2022: COVID-19 Community Level (CCL) data released for McCracken County, KY for the week of May 5, 2022 have been updated to correct a data processing error. McCracken County, KY should have appeared in the low community level category during the week of May 5, 2022. This correction is reflected in this update.

May 26, 2022: COVID-19 Community Level (CCL) data released for several Florida counties for the week of May 19th, 2022, have been corrected for a data processing error. Of note, Broward, Miami-Dade, Palm Beach Counties should have appeared in the high CCL category, and Osceola County should have appeared in the medium CCL category. These corrections are reflected in this update.

May 26, 2022: COVID-19 Community Level (CCL) data released for Orange County, New York for the week of May 26, 2022 displayed an erroneous case rate of zero and a CCL category of low due to a data source error. This county should have appeared in the medium CCL category.

June 2, 2022: COVID-19 Community Level (CCL) data released for Tolland County, CT for the week of May 26, 2022 have been updated to correct a data processing error. Tolland County, CT should have appeared in the medium community level category during the week of May 26, 2022. This correction is reflected in this update.

June 9, 2022: COVID-19 Community Level (CCL) data released for Tolland County, CT for the week of May 26, 2022 have been updated to correct a misspelling. The medium community level category for Tolland County, CT on the week of May 26, 2022 was misspelled as “meduim” in the data set. This correction is reflected in this update.

June 9, 2022: COVID-19 Community Level (CCL) data released for Mississippi counties for the week of June 9, 2022 should be interpreted with caution due to a reporting cadence change over the Memorial Day holiday that resulted in artificially inflated case rates in the state.

July 7, 2022: COVID-19 Community Level (CCL) data released for Rock County, Minnesota for the week of July 7, 2022 displayed an artificially low case rate and CCL category due to a data source error. This county should have appeared in the high CCL category.

July 14, 2022: COVID-19 Community Level (CCL) data released for Massachusetts counties for the week of July 14, 2022 should be interpreted with caution due to a reporting cadence change that resulted in lower than expected case rates and CCL categories in the state.

July 28, 2022: COVID-19 Community Level (CCL) data released for all Montana counties for the week of July 21, 2022 had case rates of 0 due to a reporting issue. The case rates have been corrected in this update.

July 28, 2022: COVID-19 Community Level (CCL) data released for Alaska for all weeks prior to July 21, 2022 included non-resident cases. The case rates for the time series have been corrected in this update.

July 28, 2022: A laboratory in Nevada reported a backlog of historic COVID-19 cases. As a result, the 7-day case count and rate will be inflated in Clark County, NV for the week of July 28, 2022.

August 4, 2022: COVID-19 Community Level (CCL) data was updated on August 2, 2022 in error during performance testing. Data for the week of July 28, 2022 was changed during this update due to additional case and hospital data as a result of late reporting between July 28, 2022 and August 2, 2022. Since the purpose of this data set is to provide point-in-time views of COVID-19 Community Levels on Thursdays, any changes made to the data set during the August 2, 2022 update have been reverted in this update.

August 4, 2022: COVID-19 Community Level (CCL) data for the week of July 28, 2022 for 8 counties in Utah (Beaver County, Daggett County, Duchesne County, Garfield County, Iron County, Kane County, Uintah County, and Washington County) case data was missing due to data collection issues. CDC and its partners have resolved the issue and the correction is reflected in this update.

August 4, 2022: Due to a reporting cadence change, case rates for all Alabama counties will be lower than expected. As a result, the CCL levels published on August 4, 2022 should be interpreted with caution.

August 11, 2022: COVID-19 Community Level (CCL) data for the week of August 4, 2022 for South Carolina have been updated to correct a data collection error that resulted in incorrect case data. CDC and its partners have resolved the issue and the correction is reflected in this update.

August 18, 2022: COVID-19 Community Level (CCL) data for the week of August 11, 2022 for Connecticut have been updated to correct a data ingestion error that inflated the CT case rates. CDC, in collaboration with CT, has resolved the issue and the correction is reflected in this update.

August 25, 2022: A laboratory in Tennessee reported a backlog of historic COVID-19 cases. As a result, the 7-day case count and rate may be inflated in many counties and the CCLs published on August 25, 2022 should be interpreted with caution.

August 25, 2022: Due to a data source error, the 7-day case rate for St. Louis County, Missouri, is reported as zero in the COVID-19 Community Level data released on August 25, 2022. Therefore, the COVID-19 Community Level for this county should be interpreted with caution.

September 1, 2022: Due to a reporting issue, case rates for all Nebraska counties will include 6 days of data instead of 7 days in the COVID-19 Community Level (CCL) data released on September 1, 2022. Therefore, the CCLs for all Nebraska counties should be interpreted with caution.

September 8, 2022: Due to a data processing error, the case rate for Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania,

Content

Obama Commutation

This folder contains data behind the story Obama Granted Clemency Unlike Any Other President In History.

The data in obama_commutations.csv is copied from the Justice Department website. The python script parses it by looking at the first column to figure out what is contained in the second column.

Source: Department of Justice

Context

This is a dataset from FiveThirtyEight hosted on their GitHub. Explore FiveThirtyEight data using Kaggle and all of the data sources available through the FiveThirtyEight organization page!

• Update Frequency: This dataset is updated daily.

Acknowledgements

This dataset is maintained using GitHub's API and Kaggle's API.

This dataset is distributed under the Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license.

Content

A Recipient-executed Grant is a Trust Fund Grant that is provided to a third party under a grant agreement, and for which the Bank plays an operational role - i.e., the Bank normally appraises and supervises activities financed by these funds. This dataset provides data on the amount of grant funds committed in the course of a fiscal year and payments made out of a Trust Fund account to eligible recipients, in accordance with the legal agreements. In fulfilling its responsibilities, the World Bank as Trustee complies with all sanctions applicable to World Bank transactions. All definitions should be regarded at present as provisional and not final, and are subject to revision at any time. Data is provided at the individual Trust Fund level and is updated as of 04/02/2015. No further updates are planned for this particular dataset, please visit the Global Partnership and Trust Fund Operations website for more details: http://go.worldbank.org/GABMG2YEI0

Context

This is a dataset hosted by the World Bank. The organization has an open data platform found here and they update their information according the amount of data that is brought in. Explore World Bank's Financial Data using Kaggle and all of the data sources available through the World Bank organization page!

• Update Frequency: This dataset is updated daily.

Acknowledgements

This dataset is maintained using Socrata's API and Kaggle's API. Socrata has assisted countless organizations with hosting their open data and has been an integral part of the process of bringing more data to the public.

This dataset is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 IGO license.

Cover photo by Joseph Gonzalez on Unsplash
Unsplash Images are distributed under a unique Unsplash License.

This dataset is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 IGO

Context

The United States have recently become the country with the most reported cases of 2019 Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19). This dataset contains daily updated number of reported cases & deaths in the US on the state and county level, as provided by the Johns Hopkins University. In addition, I provide matching demographic information for US counties.

Content

The dataset consists of two main csv files: covid_us_county.csv and us_county.csv. See the column descriptions below for more detailed information. In addition, I've added US county shape files for geospatial plots: us_county.shp/dbf/prj/shx.

• covid_us_county.csv: COVID-19 cases and deaths which will be updated daily. The data is provided by the Johns Hopkins University through their excellent github repo. I combined the separate "confirmed cases" and "deaths" files into a single table, removed a few (I think to be) redundant geo identifier columns, and reshaped the data into long format with a single date column. The earliest recorded cases are from 2020-01-22.

• us_counties.csv: Demographic information on the US county level based on the (most recent) 2014-18 release of the Amercian Community Survey. Derived via the great tidycensus package.

Column Description

COVID-19 dataset covid_us_county.csv:

• fips: County code in numeric format (i.e. no leading zeros). A small number of cases have NA values here, but can still be used for state-wise aggregation. Currently, this only affect the states of Massachusetts and Missouri.

• county: Name of the US county. This is NA for the (aggregated counts of the) territories of American Samoa, Guam, Northern Mariana Islands, Puerto Rico, and Virgin Islands.

• state: Name of US state or territory.

• state_code: Two letter abbreviation of US state (e.g. "CA" for "California"). This feature has NA values for the territories listed above.

• lat and long: coordinates of the county or territory.

• date: Reporting date.

• cases & deaths: Cumulative numbers for cases & deaths.

Demographic dataset us_counties.csv:

• fips, county, state, state_code: same as above. The county names are slightly different, but mostly the difference is that this dataset has the word "County" added. I recommend to join on fips.

• male & female: Population numbers for male and female.

• population: Total population for the county. Provided as convenience feature; is always the sum of male + female.

• female_percentage: Another convenience feature: female / population in percent.

• median_age: Overall median age for the county.

Acknowledgements

Data provided for educational and academic research purposes by the Johns Hopkins University Center for Systems Science and Engineering (JHU CSSE).

Licence

The github repo states that:

This GitHub repo and its contents herein, including all data, mapping, and analysis, copyright 2020 Johns Hopkins University, all rights reserved, is provided to the public strictly for educational and academic research purposes. The Website relies upon publicly available data from multiple sources, that do not always agree. The Johns Hopkins University hereby disclaims any and all representations and warranties with respect to the Website, including accuracy, fitness for use, and merchantability. Reliance on the Website for medical guidance or use of the Website in commerce is strictly prohibited.

Version history

• In version 1, a small number of cases had values of `county == "Unassigned". Those have been superseded.
• Version 5: added US county shape files

Context

This data set is a sample for a competition being conducted at IIT - Kanpur. Participants who have registered for this are requested to use this documentation for understanding the sample data set. It consists of 2 .csv file. One is used for training and the other for testing. Due to an increased response for this competition, the deadline for submitting the 2nd report is extended to 1st May 2019. Please Find updated information for stage 2 below the dataset description.

PLEASE NOTE: Keggle may not be updated frequently with information about the competition as it is not the official website for the same. Keep checking your registered mail for updates on the dataset and competition.

Content

The data set is gathered from a residential hostel room with 3 occupants. The residential hostel room has an AC unit for cooling purposes, a water heater and a washing machine. The Idea is to use the data set to estimate the load ahead in time and optimally schedule it to math comfort and cost requirements due to time varying cost. Hence the data set is created using real-time data from the room for a period of 1 year. However, only 1 month wort of data is currently uploaded. The rest of the data will be uploaded post screening process on 10 April 2019. The data is sampled at a rate of sample/hour and logs power readings from the 3 major equipment listed above. The attributes of the data set are described below:

1.) Date, Month and Year: Used to represent the date, month and year of the data . 2.) Day - This represents the the day of the week with 0 being Monday and 6 being Sunday 3.) Occupancy - Represents the occupancy state of the room 4.) No. Of Occupants - Represents the number of occupants in the room based on student punch card entry 5.) Hour - Represents the hour of the day starting from 0Hrs to 23Hrs. 6.) Temp and Humidity - Are the outdoor temperature and humidity readings 7.) Water Heater, AC and Washing Machine - Represent the status of the appliance under consideration. (1 = ON, 0 = OFF) 8.) Total Power - Total Power consumed by the occupants of the room 9.) PWT, PAC and PWM - Power consumed by Water Heater, AC and Washing Machine respectively.

NOTE: The washing machine data is currently not significant for the month of MAY. Hence, candidates are allowed to neglect the attributes related to the washing machine. However, once the complete data set is made available, this attribute becomes significant as well.

For Stage 2 of this competition, the students are needed to perform load scheduling on the test dataset for the 1st of June 2018. The time varying cost starting at 0:00 Hrs to 23:00 Hrs is given as a list shown below: Tariff = [10,10,10,10,10,10,10,10,12,15,16,21,23,25,25,24,22,17,16,14,11,10,10,10]

The tariff is in paisa. In addition, it must be noted that the consumer of this residential plot require their load to be scheduled only between 7:00 Hrs and 21:00 hrs. Loads other that those mentioned in this range are to be neglected for scheduling.

RTB Maps is a cloud-based electronic Atlas. We used ArGIS 10 for Desktop with Spatial Analysis Extension, ArcGIS 10 for Server on-premise, ArcGIS API for Javascript, IIS web services based on .NET, and ArcGIS Online combining data on the cloud with data and applications on our local server to develop an Atlas that brings together many of the map themes related to development of roots, tubers and banana crops. The Atlas is structured to allow our participating scientists to understand the distribution of the crops and observe the spatial distribution of many of the obstacles to production of these crops. The Atlas also includes an application to allow our partners to evaluate the importance of different factors when setting priorities for research and development. The application uses weighted overlay analysis within a multi-criteria decision analysis framework to rate the importance of factors when establishing geographic priorities for research and development.Datasets of crop distribution maps, agroecology maps, biotic and abiotic constraints to crop production, poverty maps and other demographic indicators are used as a key inputs to multi-objective criteria analysis.Further metadata/references can be found here: http://gisweb.ciat.cgiar.org/RTBmaps/DataAvailability_RTBMaps.htmlDISCLAIMER, ACKNOWLEDGMENTS AND PERMISSIONS:This service is provided by Roots, Tubers and Bananas CGIAR Research Program as a public service. Use of this service to retrieve information constitutes your awareness and agreement to the following conditions of use.This online resource displays GIS data and query tools subject to continuous updates and adjustments. The GIS data has been taken from various, mostly public, sources and is supplied in good faith.RTBMaps GIS Data Disclaimer• The data used to show the Base Maps is supplied by ESRI.• The data used to show the photos over the map is supplied by Flickr.• The data used to show the videos over the map is supplied by Youtube.• The population map is supplied to us by CIESIN, Columbia University and CIAT.• The Accessibility map is provided by Global Environment Monitoring Unit - Joint Research Centre of the European Commission. Accessibility maps are made for a specific purpose and they cannot be used as a generic dataset to represent "the accessibility" for a given study area.• Harvested area and yield for banana, cassava, potato, sweet potato and yam for the year 200, is provided by EarthSat (University of Minnesota’s Institute on the Environment-Global Landscapes initiative and McGill University’s Land Use and the Global Environment lab). Dataset from Monfreda C., Ramankutty N., and Foley J.A. 2008.• Agroecology dataset: global edapho-climatic zones for cassava based on mean growing season, temperature, number of dry season months, daily temperature range and seasonality. Dataset from CIAT (Carter et al. 1992)• Demography indicators: Total and Rural Population from Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN) and CIAT 2004.• The FGGD prevalence of stunting map is a global raster datalayer with a resolution of 5 arc-minutes. The percentage of stunted children under five years old is reported according to the lowest available sub-national administrative units: all pixels within the unit boundaries will have the same value. Data have been compiled by FAO from different sources: Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS), UNICEF MICS, WHO Global Database on Child Growth and Malnutrition, and national surveys. Data provided by FAO – GIS Unit 2007.• Poverty dataset: Global poverty headcount and absolute number of poor. Number of people living on less than $1.25 or $2.00 per day. Dataset from IFPRI and CIATTHE RTBMAPS GROUP MAKES NO WARRANTIES OR GUARANTEES, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED AS TO THE COMPLETENESS, ACCURACY, OR CORRECTNESS OF THE DATA PORTRAYED IN THIS PRODUCT NOR ACCEPTS ANY LIABILITY, ARISING FROM ANY INCORRECT, INCOMPLETE OR MISLEADING INFORMATION CONTAINED THEREIN. ALL INFORMATION, DATA AND DATABASES ARE PROVIDED "AS IS" WITH NO WARRANTY, EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. By accessing this website and/or data contained within the databases, you hereby release the RTB group and CGCenters, its employees, agents, contractors, sponsors and suppliers from any and all responsibility and liability associated with its use. In no event shall the RTB Group or its officers or employees be liable for any damages arising in any way out of the use of the website, or use of the information contained in the databases herein including, but not limited to the RTBMaps online Atlas product.APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT:• Desktop and web development - Ernesto Giron E. (GeoSpatial Consultant) e.giron.e@gmail.com• GIS Analyst - Elizabeth Barona. (Independent Consultant) barona.elizabeth@gmail.comCollaborators:Glenn Hyman, Bernardo Creamer, Jesus David Hoyos, Diana Carolina Giraldo Soroush Parsa, Jagath Shanthalal, Herlin Rodolfo Espinosa, Carlos Navarro, Jorge Cardona and Beatriz Vanessa Herrera at CIAT, Tunrayo Alabi and Joseph Rusike from IITA, Guy Hareau, Reinhard Simon, Henry Juarez, Ulrich Kleinwechter, Greg Forbes, Adam Sparks from CIP, and David Brown and Charles Staver from Bioversity International.Please note these services may be unavailable at times due to maintenance work.Please feel free to contact us with any questions or problems you may be having with RTBMaps.

After May 3, 2024, this dataset and webpage will no longer be updated because hospitals are no longer required to report data on COVID-19 hospital admissions, and hospital capacity and occupancy data, to HHS through CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network. Data voluntarily reported to NHSN after May 1, 2024, will be available starting May 10, 2024, at COVID Data Tracker Hospitalizations.

The following dataset provides facility-level data for hospital utilization aggregated on a weekly basis (Sunday to Saturday). These are derived from reports with facility-level granularity across two main sources: (1) HHS TeleTracking, and (2) reporting provided directly to HHS Protect by state/territorial health departments on behalf of their healthcare facilities.

The hospital population includes all hospitals registered with Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) as of June 1, 2020. It includes non-CMS hospitals that have reported since July 15, 2020. It does not include psychiatric, rehabilitation, Indian Health Service (IHS) facilities, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) facilities, Defense Health Agency (DHA) facilities, and religious non-medical facilities.

For a given entry, the term “collection_week” signifies the start of the period that is aggregated. For example, a “collection_week” of 2020-11-15 means the average/sum/coverage of the elements captured from that given facility starting and including Sunday, November 15, 2020, and ending and including reports for Saturday, November 21, 2020.

Reported elements include an append of either “_coverage”, “_sum”, or “_avg”.

• A “_coverage” append denotes how many times the facility reported that element during that collection week.
• A “_sum” append denotes the sum of the reports provided for that facility for that element during that collection week.
• A “_avg” append is the average of the reports provided for that facility for that element during that collection week.

The file will be updated weekly. No statistical analysis is applied to impute non-response. For averages, calculations are based on the number of values collected for a given hospital in that collection week. Suppression is applied to the file for sums and averages less than four (4). In these cases, the field will be replaced with “-999,999”.

A story page was created to display both corrected and raw datasets and can be accessed at this link: https://healthdata.gov/stories/s/nhgk-5gpv

This data is preliminary and subject to change as more data become available. Data is available starting on July 31, 2020.

Sometimes, reports for a given facility will be provided to both HHS TeleTracking and HHS Protect. When this occurs, to ensure that there are not duplicate reports, deduplication is applied according to prioritization rules within HHS Protect.

For influenza fields listed in the file, the current HHS guidance marks these fields as optional. As a result, coverage of these elements are varied.

For recent updates to the dataset, scroll to the bottom of the dataset description.

On May 3, 2021, the following fields have been added to this data set.

• hhs_ids
• previous_day_admission_adult_covid_confirmed_7_day_coverage
• previous_day_admission_pediatric_covid_confirmed_7_day_coverage
• previous_day_admission_adult_covid_suspected_7_day_coverage
• previous_day_admission_pediatric_covid_suspected_7_day_coverage
• previous_week_personnel_covid_vaccinated_doses_administered_7_day_sum
• total_personnel_covid_vaccinated_doses_none_7_day_sum
• total_personnel_covid_vaccinated_doses_one_7_day_sum
• total_personnel_covid_vaccinated_doses_all_7_day_sum
• previous_week_patients_covid_vaccinated_doses_one_7_day_sum
• previous_week_patients_covid_vaccinated_doses_all_7_day_sum

On May 8, 2021, this data set has been converted to a corrected data set. The corrections applied to this data set are to smooth out data anomalies caused by keyed in data errors. To help determine which records have had corrections made to it. An additional Boolean field called is_corrected has been added.

On May 13, 2021 Changed vaccination fields from sum to max or min fields. This reflects the maximum or minimum number reported for that metric in a given week.

On June 7, 2021 Changed vaccination fields from max or min fields to Wednesday reported only. This reflects that the number reported for that metric is only reported on Wednesdays in a given week.

On September 20, 2021, the following has been updated: The use of analytic dataset as a source.

On January 19, 2022, the following fields have been added to this dataset:

• inpatient_beds_used_covid_7_day_avg
• inpatient_beds_used_covid_7_day_sum
• inpatient_beds_used_covid_7_day_coverage

On April 28, 2022, the following pediatric fields have been added to this dataset:

• all_pediatric_inpatient_bed_occupied_7_day_avg
• all_pediatric_inpatient_bed_occupied_7_day_coverage
• all_pediatric_inpatient_bed_occupied_7_day_sum
• all_pediatric_inpatient_beds_7_day_avg
• all_pediatric_inpatient_beds_7_day_coverage
• all_pediatric_inpatient_beds_7_day_sum
• previous_day_admission_pediatric_covid_confirmed_0_4_7_day_sum
• previous_day_admission_pediatric_covid_confirmed_12_17_7_day_sum
• previous_day_admission_pediatric_covid_confirmed_5_11_7_day_sum
• previous_day_admission_pediatric_covid_confirmed_unknown_7_day_sum
• staffed_icu_pediatric_patients_confirmed_covid_7_day_avg
• staffed_icu_pediatric_patients_confirmed_covid_7_day_coverage
• staffed_icu_pediatric_patients_confirmed_covid_7_day_sum
• staffed_pediatric_icu_bed_occupancy_7_day_avg
• staffed_pediatric_icu_bed_occupancy_7_day_coverage
• staffed_pediatric_icu_bed_occupancy_7_day_sum
• total_staffed_pediatric_icu_beds_7_day_avg
• total_staffed_pediatric_icu_beds_7_day_coverage
• total_staffed_pediatric_icu_beds_7_day_sum

On October 24, 2022, the data includes more analytical calculations in efforts to provide a cleaner dataset. For a raw version of this dataset, please follow this link: https://healthdata.gov/Hospital/COVID-19-Reported-Patient-Impact-and-Hospital-Capa/uqq2-txqb

Due to changes in reporting requirements, after June 19, 2023, a collection week is defined as starting on a Sunday and ending on the next Saturday.

Content

The World Bank EdStats All Indicator Query holds over 4,000 internationally comparable indicators that describe education access, progression, completion, literacy, teachers, population, and expenditures. The indicators cover the education cycle from pre-primary to vocational and tertiary education.

The query also holds learning outcome data from international and regional learning assessments (e.g. PISA, TIMSS, PIRLS), equity data from household surveys, and projection/attainment data to 2050. For further information, please visit the EdStats website.

Context

This is a dataset hosted by the World Bank. The organization has an open data platform found here and they update their information according the amount of data that is brought in. Explore the World Bank using Kaggle and all of the data sources available through the World Bank organization page!

• Update Frequency: This dataset is updated daily.

Acknowledgements

This dataset is maintained using the World Bank's APIs and Kaggle's API.

Cover photo by Sharon McCutcheon on Unsplash
Unsplash Images are distributed under a unique Unsplash License.

AADT represents current (most recent) Annual Average Daily Traffic on sampled road systems. This information is displayed using the Traffic Count Locations Active feature class as of the annual HPMS freeze in January. Historical AADT is found in another table. Please note that updates to this dataset are on an annual basis, therefore the data may not match ground conditions or may not be available for new roadways. Resource Contact: Christy Prentice, Traffic Forecasting & Analysis (TFA), http://www.dot.state.mn.us/tda/contacts.html#TFA

Check other metadata records in this package for more information on Annual Average Daily Traffic Locations Information.


Link to ESRI Feature Service:

Annual Average Daily Traffic Locations in Minnesota: Annual Average Daily Traffic Locations

February 2nd Update

The AP has requested a timeseries dataset reporting daily counts for distributed and administered vaccines in the U.S. from the CDC. In the absence of that dataset, we are storing daily snapshots of the cumulative counts provided by the CDC COVID Data Tracker and compiling a timeseries dataset here. This process has captured cumulative counts going back to January 4th and daily counts of new doses administered and distributed going back to January 5th. The timeseries dataset also includes seven-day rolling average calculations for the daily metrics.

We have identified a few instances of decreasing cumulative counts in this timeseries, which result in single-day negative counts. We are treating these instances as corrections, and include the negative counts in the rolling averages.

We are investigating the cumulative count decreases and will update the timeseries dataset if necessary with additional information from the CDC. When the CDC provides its own timeseries dataset we will make that available here.

Overview

The AP is using data provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to report vaccine doses distributed and administered in the United States.

This data is from the CDC's COVID Data Tracker, which is updated daily. However, keep in mind that healthcare providers can report doses to federal, state, territorial, and local agencies up to 72 hours after doses are administered.

To learn more about AP's data journalism capabilities for publishers, corporations and financial institutions, go here or email kromano@ap.org.

Interactive

The AP has designed an interactive map to track COVID-19 vaccine counts reported by The CDC. @(https://interactives.ap.org/embeds/TUVpf/14/)

Interactive Embed Code

<iframe title="Tracking US COVID vaccinations" aria-label="Map" id="datawrapper-chart-TUVpf" src="https://interactives.ap.org/embeds/TUVpf/14/" scrolling="no" width="100%" style="border:none" height="548"></iframe><script type="text/javascript">!function(){"use strict";window.addEventListener("message",(function(a){if(void 0!==a.data["datawrapper-height"])for(var e in a.data["datawrapper-height"]){var t=document.getElementById("datawrapper-chart-"+e)||document.querySelector("iframe[src*='"+e+"']");t&&(t.style.height=a.data["datawrapper-height"][e]+"px")}}))}();</script>

Caveats

From The CDC: - Numbers reported on CDC’s website are validated through a submission process with each jurisdiction and may differ from numbers posted on other websites. - Differences between reporting jurisdictions and CDC’s website may occur due to the timing of reporting and website updates. - The process used for reporting doses distributed or people vaccinated displayed by other websites may differ.

Abstract copyright UK Data Service and data collection copyright owner.Next Steps (also known as the Longitudinal Study of Young People in England (LSYPE1)) is a major longitudinal cohort study following a nationally representative group of around 16,000 who were in Year 9 attending state and independent schools in England in 2004, a cohort born in 1989-90.The first seven sweeps of the study were conducted annually (2004-2010) when the study was funded and managed by the Department for Education (DfE). The study mainly focused on the educational and early labour market experiences of young people.In 2015 Next Steps was restarted, under the management of the Centre for Longitudinal Studies (CLS) at the UCL Faculty of Education and Society (IOE) and funded by the Economic and Social Research Council. The Next Steps Age 25 survey was aimed at increasing the understanding of the lives of young adults growing up today and the transitions out of education and into early adult life.The Next Steps Age 32 Survey took place between April 2022 and September 2023 and is the ninth sweep of the study. The Age 32 Survey aimed to provide data for research and policy on the lives of this generation of adults in their early 30s. This sweep also collected information on many wider aspects of cohort members' lives including health and wellbeing, politics and social participation, identity and attitudes as well as capturing personality, resilience, working memory and financial literacy. Next Steps survey data is also linked to the National Pupil Database (NPD), the Hospital Episode Statistics (HES), the Individualised Learner Records (ILR) and the Student Loans Company (SLC). There are now two separate studies that began under the LSYPE programme. The second study, Our Future (LSYPE2) (available at the UK Data Service under GN 2000110), began in 2013 and will track a sample of over 13,000 young people annually from ages 13/14 through to age 20.Further information about Next Steps may be found on the CLS website.Secure Access datasets:Secure Access versions of Next Steps have more restrictive access conditions than Safeguarded versions available under the standard End User Licence (see 'Access' section).Secure Access versions of the Next Steps include:sensitive variables from the questionnaire data for Sweeps 1-9. These are available under Secure Access SN 8656. National Pupil Database (NPD) linked data at Key Stages 2, 3, 4 and 5, England. These are available under SN 7104.Linked Individualised Learner Records learner and learning aims datasets for academic years 2005 to 2014, England. These are available under SN 8577.detailed geographic indicators for Sweep 1 and Sweep 8 (2001 Census Boundaries) - available under SN 8189 and geographic indicators for Sweep 8 (2011 Census Boundaries) - available under SN 8190. The Sweep 1 geography file was previously held under SN 7104.Linked Health Administrative Datasets (Hospital Episode Statistics) for years 1998-2017 held under SN 8681.Linked Student Loans Company Records for years 2007-2021 held under SN 8848.When researchers are approved/accredited to access a Secure Access version of Next Steps, the Safeguarded (EUL) version of the study - Next Steps: Sweeps 1-9, 2004-2023 (SN 5545) - will be automatically provided alongside. SN 8656 - Next Steps: Sweeps 1-9, 2004-2023: Secure Access includes sensitive variables from the main Next Steps survey from Sweep 1 (age 14) to Sweep 9 (age 32). A version of these variables were previously available under SN 7104. University identifiers for Sweeps 6 and 7 have also been reinstated and are available in the young person file. International Data Access Network (IDAN)These data are now available to researchers based outside the UK. Selected UKDS SecureLab/controlled datasets from the Institute for Social and Economic Research (ISER) and the Centre for Longitudinal Studies (CLS) have been made available under the International Data Access Network (IDAN) scheme, via a Safe Room access point at one of the UKDS IDAN partners. Prospective users should read the UKDS SecureLab application guide for non-ONS data for researchers outside of the UK via Safe Room Remote Desktop Access. Further details about the IDAN scheme can be found on the UKDS International Data Access Network webpage and on the IDAN website.Latest edition informationFor the third edition (September 2024), sensitive variables for Sweep 9 (Age 32) have been added to the study. The main interview file includes unit group (4-digit) SOC2010, SOC20 and SIC2007 codes for current job, first job, job at age 25 and partner's job; university from which obtained undergraduate and post-graduate degrees; detailed long standing illness, national identity, gender and day date variables. In addition there is a separate pregnancy histories dataset which includes variables on type of fertility treatment received. Main Topics: The Safeguarded (EUL) version of Next Steps is provided alongside the Secure Access version. Additional variables which are available under Secure Access are from the following categories: date of interview (detailed)date of birth (detailed)detailed disabilitiesfull or detailed SOC/SIC codeschild care arrangementshigher Education identifierspotential school identifiers In this revised deposit, the variable denoting number of rooms in the house has been top-coded and there are truncated versions of SOC and SIC codes, longstanding illness and subject studied at university, The original version of the variables containing the detailed values is available under Secure Access. Multi-stage stratified random sample Face-to-face interview Telephone interview

The census is undertaken by the Office for National Statistics every 10 years and gives us a picture of all the people and households in England and Wales. The most recent census took place in March of 2021.The census asks every household questions about the people who live there and the type of home they live in. In doing so, it helps to build a detailed snapshot of society. Information from the census helps the government and local authorities to plan and fund local services, such as education, doctors' surgeries and roads.Key census statistics for Leicester are published on the open data platform to make information accessible to local services, voluntary and community groups, and residents. There is also a dashboard published showcasing various datasets from the census allowing users to view data for all MSOAs and compare this with Leicester overall statistics.Further information about the census and full datasets can be found on the ONS website - https://www.ons.gov.uk/census/aboutcensus/censusproductsProficiency in EnglishThis dataset provides Census 2021 estimates that classify usual residents in England and Wales by their proficiency in English. The estimates are as at Census Day, 21 March 2021.Definition: How well people whose main language is not English (English or Welsh in Wales) speak English.This dataset provides details for the MSOAs of Leicester city.

A log of dataset alerts open, monitored or resolved on the open data portal. Alerts can include issues as well as deprecation or discontinuation notices.

The major topics are: 1. Gathering information on the EU and media usage (sources of information), 2. EU enlargement, 3. EU integration. Topics: 1. Media usage: television stations, daily newspapers, weekly newspapers, magazines, radio stations regularly used; preference for certain television broadcasts such as news, series, music broadcasts, sports broadcasts, films, documentary film, children's broadcasts, talk shows, home shopping e. g. ; naming the two most positive and the two most negative aspects of the EU; desires for information and information actually found about the EU in daily newspapers and on television; sources of information and information media about the EU, used and preferred; usefulness of sources of information about the EU; judgment on the information content, the objectivity and the impartiality of reporting on television and in daily newspapers regarding EU questions; knowledge and frequency of use of information services of the EU; satisfaction with information received; readiness to use EU information services in the future; obtaining information directly from EU institutions and satisfaction with information received; readiness to use EU institutions in the future to obtain information; preferred means (SMS, e-mail, phone call, letter or visit)to communicate personal comments to the EU; interest in selected EU topics such as: personal rights as an EU citizen, history of the development of the EU, objectives and powers of the EU, certain EU institutions and EU treaties, EU policies and business, EU enlargement, consequences of introduction of the Euro, student exchange programs, immigration policy, traffic policy, policies on developing countries, agricultural policy, culture policies, fight against crime, environmental policy, health policies, food safety; personal Internet use; place of Internet connection; desired EU topics on the Internet; visit to the EU website "Europe" and reasons for the visit; desired topics on the EU website; willingness of respondent to take part in an online discussion with EU decision-makers; interest in opinions of people from EU member countries and from candidates to join the EU about the future of Europe and desired means of information in this respect; interest in opinions of politicians from other EU member countries, the national constitution and EU treaties. 2. EU enlargement: knowledge of selected European countries; candidates to join the EU already visited; planned visit to candidates to join the EU as well as connections and contacts in candidates to join the EU; interest in information about candidates to join the EU(in the areas tourism, business, culture, gastronomy, history, politics, sport e. g. ); interest in vacation, work, study or business relations in the countries joining the EU; knowledge of candidates to join the EU; extent to which informed about the EU enlargement; sources of information on the EU enlargement, used and preferred; personal participation in the political discussion about the EU enlargement; attitude to the EU enlargement; the country that profits most from EU enlargement and reasons for this assessment; assessment of the personal situation after EU enlargement and reasons for this; assessment of the situation of various economic areas after EU enlargement; preferred pace of enlargement; importance of various acceptance criteria for candidates to join the EU (scale); attitudes to the EU enlargement and expected consequences; assessment of the level of immigration and commuters in one's own country through EU enlargement and evaluation as well as reasons for this assessment. 3. EU integration: solidarity with the place of residence, the region, country and the EU; preferred institutions that should spread information about the EU and its activities; assessment of the importance of EU political topics(split, alternative question formulations)as well as the effectiveness of the EU with the topics: enlargement, populism, introduction of the Euro, fight against poverty, environment, consumer protection, unemployment, EU reform, combating crime, securing of peace, significance of the EU in the world, democracy, immigration and economic growth; advantageousness of EU membership of one's country; best wishes for the EU (scale); evaluation of the decisions made in common in the EU for the country and the respondent himself; attitude to EU policies in general; estimated influence of the country and the citizens on EU decisions; assessment of personal effectiveness and of the country on EU decisions; most in fluencial groups in the EU; member countries with the greatest and least influence in the EU. Demography: size of household; persons over 15 years; nationality; self-assessment on a left-right continuum; party preference (Sunday question); marital status; age at end of education; age; sex; occupation; head of household; city size; household income; possession of a telephone. Die Themenschwerpunkte sind: 1. Informationsbeschaffung über die EU und Mediennutzung (Informationsquellen), 2. EU-Erweiterung, 3. EU-Integration. Themen: 1. Mediennutzung: Regelmäßig genutzte Fernsehsender, Tageszeitungen, Wochenzeitungen, Zeitschriften, Radiosender; Präferenz für bestimmte Fernsehsendungen wie Nachrichten, Serien, Musiksendungen, Sportsendungen, Filme, Dokumentarfilme, Kindersendungen, Talkshows, Home Shopping u. a. ; Benennung der zwei positivsten und der zwei negativsten Aspekte der EU; Informationswünsche und tatsächlich gefundene Information über die EU in Tageszeitungen und im Fernsehen; genutzte und präferierte Informationsquellen und Informationsmedien über die EU; Nützlichkeit der Informationsquellen über die EU; Beurteilung des Informationsgehalts, der Objektivität und der Parteilichkeit der Berichterstattung des Fernsehens und der Tageszeitungen bezüglich der EU-Fragen; Kenntnis und Häufigkeit der Nutzung der Informationsdienste der EU; Zufriedenheit mit der erhaltenen Information; Bereitschaft, die EU-Informationsdienste in Zukunft zu nutzen; Informationsbeschaffung direkt bei den EU-Institutionen und Zufriedenheit mit der erhaltenen Information; Bereitschaft, die EU-Institutionen in Zukunft zur Informationsbeschaffung zu nutzen; präferierte Mittel (SMS, E-Mail, Anruf, Brief oder Besuch) um eigene Kommentare an die EU zu vermitteln; Interesse an ausgewählten EU-Themen wie: eigene Rechte als EU-Bürger, Entwicklungsgeschichte der EU, Ziele und Befugnisse der EU, bestimmte EU-Institutionen und EU-Verträge, EU-Politik und Wirtschaft, EU-Erweiterung, Folgen der Euro-Einführung, Studentenaustauschprogramme, Einwanderungspolitik, Verkehrspolitik, Entwicklungspolitik, Agrarpolitik, Kulturpolitik, Kriminalitätsbekämpfung, Umweltpolitik, Gesundheitspolitik, Lebensmittelsicherheit; persönliche Internetnutzung; Ort des Internetanschlusses; gewünschte EU-Themen im Internet; Besuch der EU-Website ´Europa´ und Gründe des Besuchs; Gewünschte Themen auf der EU-Website; Bereitschaft des Befragten an einer Online-Diskussion mit EU-Entscheidungsträgern teilzunehmen; Interesse an Meinungen von Menschen aus EU-Mitgliedsstaaten und aus EU-Beitrittskandidaten über die Zukunft Europas und gewünschte Informationsmittel diesbezüglich; Interesse an Meinungen von Politikern aus anderen EU-Mitgliedsstaaten, an der nationalen Konstitution und an EU-Verträgen. 2. EU-Erweiterung: Kenntnis ausgewählter europäischer Länder; bereits besuchte EU-Beitrittskandidaten; geplante Besuche in EU-Beitrittskandidaten sowie Verbindungen und Kontakte in EU-Beitrittskandidaten; Interesse an Informationen über EU-Beitrittskandidaten (in den Bereichen Tourismus, Wirtschaft, Kultur, Gastronomie, Geschichte, Politik, Sport u. a. ); Interesse an Urlaub, Arbeit, Studium oder geschäftlichen Beziehungen in den EU-Beitrittsländern; Kenntnis von EU-Beitrittskandidaten; Informiertheit über EU-Erweiterung; genutzte und präferierte Informationsquellen zur EU-Erweiterung; eigene Beteiligung an der politischen Diskussion um die EU-Erweiterung; Einstellung zur EU-Erweiterung; Land, das am meisten von EU-Erweiterung profitiert und Gründe für diese Einschätzung; Einschätzung der eigenen Lage nach der EU-Erweiterung und Gründe dafür; Einschätzung der Lage verschiedener Wirtschaftsbereiche nach der EU-Erweiterung; bevorzugte Erweiterungsgeschwindigkeit; Wichtigkeit von verschiedenen Aufnahmekriterien für EU-Beitrittskandidaten (Skala); Einstellungen zur EU-Erweiterung und erwartete Konsequenzen; Einschätzung der Höhe von Zuwanderungen und Pendlern in das eigene Landdurch EU-Erweiterung und Bewertung sowie Gründe für diese Einschätzung. 3. EU-Integration: Verbundenheit mit dem Wohnort, der Region, dem Land und der EU; präferierte Institutionen, die Informationen über die EU und ihre Aktivitäten verbreiten soll; Einschätzung der Wichtigkeit von EU-politischen Themen (Split, alternative Frageformulierungen) sowie der Wirksamkeit der EU bei den Themen: Erweiterung, Bürgernähe, Euro-Einführung, Armutsbekämpfung, Umwelt, Verbraucherschutz, Arbeitslosigkeit, EU-Reform, Verbrechensbekämpfung, Friedenssicherung, Weltbedeutung der EU, Demokratie, Einwanderung und Wirtschaftswachstum; Vorteilhaftigkeit der EU-Mitgliedschaft des eigenen Landes; Wohlwollen gegenüber der EU (Skalometer); Bewertung der gemeinsam in der EU getroffenen Entscheidungen für das Land und den Befragten selbst; Einstellung zur EU-Politik im Allgemeinen; geschätzter Einfluss des Landes und der Bürger auf EU-Entscheidungen; Einschätzung der eigenen Wirksamkeit und der des Landes auf EU-Entscheidungen; einflussreichste Gruppen in der EU; Mitgliedsländer mit dem größten und geringsten Einfluss in der EU. Demographie: Haushaltsgröße; Personen über 15 Jahre; Nationalität; Selbsteinschätzung auf einem Links-Rechts-Kontinuum; Parteipräferenz(Sonntagsfrage); Familienstand; Alter am Ende der Ausbildung; Alter; Geschlecht; Beruf; Haushaltsvorstand;

The census is undertaken by the Office for National Statistics every 10 years and gives us a picture of all the people and households in England and Wales. The most recent census took place in March of 2021.The census asks every household questions about the people who live there and the type of home they live in. In doing so, it helps to build a detailed snapshot of society. Information from the census helps the government and local authorities to plan and fund local services, such as education, doctors' surgeries and roads.Key census statistics for Leicester are published on the open data platform to make information accessible to local services, voluntary and community groups, and residents. There is also a dashboard published showcasing various datasets from the census allowing users to view data for the MSOAs of Leicester and compare this with Leicester overall statistics.Further information about the census and full datasets can be found on the ONS website - https://www.ons.gov.uk/census/aboutcensus/censusproductsCountry of birthThis dataset provides Census 2021 estimates that classify usual residents in England and Wales by their country of birth. The estimates are as at Census Day, 21 March 2021.Definition: The country in which a person was born. For people not born in one of in the four parts of the UK, there was an option to select "elsewhere". People who selected "elsewhere" were asked to write in the current name for their country of birth.