This Dataset contains year and state-wise total number of dog bite cases from Integrated Disease Surveillance Programme(IDSP)

Note: Data for 2025 is till January

BackgroundCanine rabies is a neglected disease causing 55,000 human deaths worldwide per year, and 99% of all cases are transmitted by dog bites. In N'Djaména, the capital of Chad, rabies is endemic with an incidence of 1.71/1,000 dogs (95% C.I. 1.45–1.98). The gold standard of rabies diagnosis is the direct immunofluorescent antibody (DFA) test, requiring a fluorescent microscope. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC, Atlanta, United States of America) developed a histochemical test using low-cost light microscopy, the direct rapid immunohistochemical test (dRIT).Methodology/Principal FindingsWe evaluated the dRIT in the Chadian National Veterinary Laboratory in N'Djaména by testing 35 fresh samples parallel with both the DFA and dRIT. Additional retests (n = 68 in Chad, n = 74 at CDC) by DFA and dRIT of stored samples enhanced the power of the evaluation. All samples were from dogs, cats, and in one case from a bat. The dRIT performed very well compared to DFA. We found a 100% agreement of the dRIT and DFA in fresh samples (n = 35). Results of retesting at CDC and in Chad depended on the condition of samples. When the sample was in good condition (fresh brain tissue), we found simple Cohen's kappa coefficient related to the DFA diagnostic results in fresh tissue of 0.87 (95% C.I. 0.63–1) up to 1. For poor quality samples, the kappa values were between 0.13 (95% C.I. −0.15–0.40) and 0.48 (95% C.I. 0.14–0.82). For samples stored in glycerol, dRIT results were more likely to agree with DFA testing in fresh samples than the DFA retesting.Conclusion/SignificanceThe dRIT is as reliable a diagnostic method as the gold standard (DFA) for fresh samples. It has an advantage of requiring only light microscopy, which is 10 times less expensive than a fluorescence microscope. Reduced cost suggests high potential for making rabies diagnosis available in other cities and rural areas of Africa for large populations for which a capacity for diagnosis will contribute to rabies control.

NYC Reported Dog Bites.

Section 11.03 of NYC Health Code requires all animals bites to be reported within 24 hours of the event.

Information reported assists the Health Department to determine if the biting dog is healthy ten days after the person was bitten in order to avoid having the person bitten receive unnecessary rabies shots. Data is collected from reports received online, mail, fax or by phone to 311 or NYC DOHMH Animal Bite Unit. Each record represents a single dog bite incident. Information on breed, age, gender and Spayed or Neutered status have not been verified by DOHMH and is listed only as reported to DOHMH. A blank space in the dataset means no data was available.

Active Dog Licenses. All dog owners residing in NYC are required by law to license their dogs. The data is sourced from the DOHMH Dog Licensing System (https://a816-healthpsi.nyc.gov/DogLicense), where owners can apply for and renew dog licenses. Each record represents a unique dog license that was active during the year, but not necessarily a unique record per dog, since a license that is renewed during the year results in a separate record of an active license period. Each record stands as a unique license period for the dog over the course of the yearlong time frame.

Off-leash areas When exercising dogs off-leash, owners and handlers must maintain control over their dogs at all times. Be alert and make sure that your dog isn't behaving aggressively towards other dogs or people. Dog owners are responsible for cleaning up after their pets. Fully fenced dog exercise areas Wellington has three fully fenced off-leash dog exercise areas: lower part of Treasure Island / Kainui Reserve, Hataitai (land opposite Cog Park) Ian Galloway Park in Karori / Northland – this area is lit from dusk until 8pm Taylor Park, Tawa (access through Redwood Station car park). On-leash areas Leashed dogs are welcome in many popular gardens, most of the Wellington Town Belt and on city streets. Central city Dog owners are welcome to walk through the central city with their dogs on-leash at all times of the day and throughout the year. Dogs across the city are not allowed to be left unattended in any public place.

This dataset is about artists. It has 1 row and is filtered where the artworks is Dead Dogs. Portugal and Spain 1989. It features 9 columns including birth date, death date, country, and gender.

Hybridization between domesticated animals and their wild counterparts can disrupt adaptive gene combinations, reduce genetic diversity, extinguish wild populations and change ecosystem function. The dingo is a free-ranging dog that is an iconic apex predator and distributed throughout most of mainland Australia. Dingoes readily hybridize with domestic dogs, and in many Australian jurisdictions, distinct management strategies are dictated by hybrid status. Yet, the magnitude and spatial extent of domestic dog–dingo hybridization is poorly characterized. To address this, we performed a continent-wide analysis of hybridization throughout Australia based on 24 locus microsatellite DNA genotypes from 3637 free-ranging dogs. Although 46% of all free-ranging dogs were classified as pure dingoes, all regions exhibited some hybridization, and the magnitude varied substantially. The southeast of Australia was highly admixed, with 99% of animals being hybrids or feral domestic dogs, whereas only 13% of the animals from remote central Australia were hybrids. Almost all free-ranging dogs had some dingo ancestry, indicating that domestic dogs could have poor survivorship in nonurban Australian environments. Overall, wild pure dingoes remain the dominant predator over most of Australia, but the speed and extent to which hybridization has occurred in the approximately 220 years since the first introduction of domestic dogs indicate that the process may soon threaten the persistence of pure dingoes.

The moviesAnalyzed.csv file is a comma-separatede-value file with thedata used in Ghirlanda S, Acerbi A, Herzog H, "Dog movie stars and dogbreed popularity," currently under review at Proceedings of the RoyalSociety of Lomdon, B. The columns in the file have the meaning given below. When a piece ofinformation was not found or cannot be computed, it is given as NA(see paper for possible reasons).

The quantities before[n], after[n], and effect[n] are calculated asgiven in the paper.

dog: name of the dog actor breed: the portrayed dog's breed year: the year of movie release title: the movie title earnings1: movie earnings during the opening weekend (in 2012 USD) earnings: total movie earnings (in 2012 USD) disney: whether the movies has been produced by the Walt Disney Company before[n]: the n-year popularity trend of the considered breed beforemovie release after[n]: the n-year popularity trend of the considered breed aftermovie release popularity[n]: average number of registrations for the consideredbreed in the 2n+1 years around movie release (between n years beforeand n years after) effect[n]: the n-year effect of the movie on the breed's popularity trend excess[n]: registrations of the considered breed attributable to movierelease (actual registrations over the n years after movie releaseminus registrations predicted based on the trend observed n yearsbefore movie release) viewers: estimated number of people who saw the movie viewers1: estimated number of people who saw the movie over itsopening weekend

Context

This dataset was created when I practiced webscraping.

Content

The data is a compilation of information on dogs who were available for adoption on December 12, 2019 in the Hungarian Database of Homeless Pets. In total, there were 2,937 dogs in the database. It contains information on dogs' names, breed, color, age, sex, the date they were found, and some characteristics of their personalities.

Inspiration

I thought it would be interesting to have a dataset that looks at adoptable dogs' characteristics. It is not really well-suited for prediction, but could be a good practice dataset for data visualization and working with categorical data.

This dataset is about artists. It has 1 row and is filtered where the artworks is Market Place of Town, with Figures, Carts and Dogs. It features 9 columns including birth date, death date, country, and gender.

This dataset is about artists. It has 1 row and is filtered where the artworks is David Bowie, Diamond Dogs. It features 9 columns including birth date, death date, country, and gender.

The Indonesian island province of Bali experienced its first rabies incursion in 2008. Mass vaccination of the dog population has proven effective and rabies cases in dogs and people have decreased, however the virus is still circulating among the dog population. Vaccination coverage must be maintained until rabies elimination. Increasing efficiency and effectiveness of vaccination campaigns is therefore desired. Community engagement leading to preventative health actions by community members can reduce disease incidence and costs of control. Here we evaluate 2 years of a novel community-based dog welfare and rabies control project (Program Dharma) in the Sanur sub-district. The project engaged the services of people living in the project area with an interest or experience in dogs or community health services. These people spoke with owners within their own community about dog welfare and health, monitored owned and unowned dogs and increased owner and carer efforts to access vaccination and further veterinary services. The evaluation focused on a sample of dogs whose owners had been regularly engaged with project. Vaccination coverage was increased and there were no dog or human rabies cases reported in the project area; the percentage of the dogs that had never been vaccinated was reduced by an average 28.3% (baseline unvaccinated 41–49%, post-project unvaccinated 11–19%). The welfare of dogs improved from an average of 20.7% of dogs with visible welfare problems at baseline to 2.7% after project implementation. Roaming dog density observed on street surveys also decreased in all project areas (24–47% reduction dependent on desa). A participatory evaluation event with a sample of Program Dharma community-based agents highlighted several additional successes, including that the community appeared to welcome and value their services and were beginning to support the cost of project activities. Conversely, challenges included identifying dogs in the database during revisits, sustaining the costs of community member time spent working on Program Dharma activities and the costs of veterinary care, whilst avoiding dependency of owners on free veterinary services. The benefits revealed by the evaluation were judged to be sufficient to extend Program Dharma to new areas, whilst evolving activities to resolve challenges.

Kappa Index table to statistically show pairwise comparisons and agreement among three serological tests: Chagas Stat-Pak, Chagas Detect Plus, and indirect fluorescent antibody (IFA) test.

Animal Services Provides for the care and control of animals in the Louisville Metro area, including pet licensing and pet adoption.Data Dictionary:kennel- Location of where the animal is being housed.animal id- Unique identifying number assigned to each specific animaljurisdiction- The zip code the animal was picked up from.intake type/intake subtype- The reason why the animal was impounded at MAS.CONFISCATE The animal was impounded due to a violation of Louisville Metro Ordinance or Kentucky Revised StatutesABANDONED Animal was impounded because of a violation of the Abandonment ordinanceBITE Animal was impounded due to biting someoneCHAINING Animal was impounded for a chaining violationCOURT ORD Animal was impounded as a result of a court orderCRUELTY Animal was impounded for a violation of the Cruelty ordinance or statuteDANGER DOG Animal was impounded because of a violation of the Dangerous Dog/Potentially Dangerous Dog ordinanceEVICTION Animal was impounded during an evictionHOSPITAL Animal was impounded due to the owner being in the hospitalNEGLECT Animal was impounded for a violation of the Provision of Necessities ordinanceOWNER DIED Animal was impounded because their owner diedPOLICE Animal was impounded by the policePOTDANGER Animal was impounded because of a violation of the Dangerous Dog/Potentially Dangerous Dog ordinanceRESTRAINT Animal impounded by an animal control officer for restraint violationUNPERMITED Animal was impounded by an animal control officer for not being licensed or permittedDISPOSAL The animal was brought to the shelter deceased to be properly disposedFIELD An animal control officer picks up a deceased animal while outside the shelter.OWNER A owner turns in their deceased animalSTRAY A deceased unowned animal is brought in to MAS by a citizen.VET CLINIC The animal was brought to the shelter deceased to be properly disposed by a vet clinic.WILDLIFE A citizen turning in a deceased wild animal.EVACUEE The animal was impounded due to the owner being evacuated due to a natural disasterFIELD The animal was impounded outside of the shelter due to the owner being evacuated due to a natural disasterOTC The animal was impounded at the shelter due to the owner being evacuated due to a natural disasterFOR TRANSP This category was used when MAS impounded an animal from a rescue or other shelter to be transported by MAS to another rescueK HUMANE S MAS impounded an animal from Kentucky Humane Society to be transported by MAS to another rescueRESCUE GRP MAS impounded an animal from a rescue group to be transported by MAS to another rescueFOSTER When a foster returns an animal to MAS to go up for adoptionRETURN When a foster returns an animal to MAS to go up for adoptionFOUND When a citizen reports finding a dog.WEB Category used when a citizen reports an animal lost or found on the websiteLOST When a citizen reports their dog missing.WEB Category used when a citizen reports an animal lost or found on the websiteOWNER SUR The animal was impounded due to the owner signing over their rights to MAS.EUTH REQ Animal was surrendered to be euthanized.FIELD Animal was surrendered by its owner to an officer while the officer was outside of the shelterOTC Animal was surrendered by its owner to MASRETURN 30 Animal is surrendered by an adopter before owning it 30 daysRETURN The animal was impounded due to being returned by the adopterADOPTION The animal was impounded due to being returned by the adopterK HUMANE S The animal was impounded due to being returned by Kentucky Humane SocietySTRAY The animal was impounded for being a stray either in the field or at the shelter.FIELD Animal was impounded in the field usually by an animal control officerOTC Animal was impounded at Metro Animal Services usually being turned in by a citizenintake date - Date the animal was impoundedsurreason - The reason why the animal was surrenderedABANDON The animal was abandonedAFRAID The animal was afraid of the ownerAGG ANIMAL The animal was animal aggressiveAGG FEAR The animal was fear aggressiveAGG FOOD The animal was food aggressiveAGG PEOPLE The animal was aggressive towards peopleALLERGIC The owner was allergic to the animalATTENTION The animal required too much attentionBITES The animal bites peopleBOX ODOR The owner does not like the smell of the litter boxCHASES ANI The animal chases other animalsCHASES CAR The animal chases carsCHASES PEO The animal chases peopleCHILD PROB Children are an issueCOMPET ATT Animal competes for attentionCOPROPHAGY The animal ate its own fecesCOST The owner could not afford the cost to keep the animalCRUELTY The animal was impounded due to cruelty offenseDESTRUC IN The animal is destructive inside the homeDESTRUC OT The animal is destructive while outsideDISOBIDIEN The animal was disobedientDIVORCE The owner is going through a divorceDOA The animal was turned in because it was deceasedDULL The animal will not interact with the ownerESCAPES The animal escapes from its homeEUTH BEHAV The animal was surrendered to be euthanized due to the animals behaviorEUTH MED The animal was surrendered to be euthanized due to the animals medical conditionEUTH OLD The animal was surrendered to be euthanized due to the animal being oldEUTH OTHER The animal was surrendered to be euthanized due to another reason not listed.EUTH YOUNG The animal was surrendered to be euthanized due to the animal being too youngFACILITY The animal was returned to MAS from another facilityFOSTER RET The foster returned the animalFOUND ANIM The person surrendering the animal found it and was not the ownerGIFT The owner received the pet as a giftHOUSE SOIL Animal uses the bathroom in the houseHYPER The animal is too energetic for its ownerILL The animal had an illnessINJURED The animal was injuredJUMPS UP The animal jumps up to much for the owner to handleKILLS ANIM The animal kills other animalsLANDLORD The landlord will not allow the owner to have the animalMOVE The owner was moving and could not take the animalNEW BABY The owner cannot keep the animal due to having a babyNO HOME The owner was homelessNO PROTECT The owner wants a animal that will protect themNO TIME The owner did not have enough time for the animalNOFRIENDLY The animal is not friendly with the ownerOTHER PET The animal does not get along with another pet in the householdOWNER DIED The owner of the animal diedOWNER MED The owner has a medical conditionPETMEDICAL The animal has a medical conditionPICA The animal has persistent chewing or consumption of non nutritional substancesRESPONSIBL The owner is not responsible enough for the animalSHEDS The animal sheds too muchSTRAY The animal was a strayTOO BIG The animal was too bigTOO MANY The owner has too many animals to care forTOO OLD The animal was too oldTOO SMALL The animal was too smallTOO YOUNG The animal was too youngTRANSFER LMAS took back an animal they adopted or sent to rescue from another facilityTRAVEL Owner is not home enough to keep animalUNKNOWN No reason was given why the animal was surrenderedUW ALTER The owner does not want the animal if it has to be alteredVIOLATION The animal was impounded due to a violation of the ordinanceVOCALThe animal is too loudWANTS OUT The owner can no longer care for the animalWILDLIFE The animal was turned in because it was wildlifeWONT ALLOW The owner is not allowed to keep the animal where they are atWRONG SEX The animal was not the correct sexWRONG SPEC The animal was not the correct speciesoutcome type/outcome subtypeADOPTION Animal was adoptedAAA Approved Adoption ApplicationBARKSTOWN Animal was adopted during an event at BarkstownBARNCAT Cat was adopted to be a barn catCAT CAFÉ Cat was at Cat Café when it was adoptedCRAIGSLIST Adopter saw the animal on Craigslist and came to MAS to adopt it.EVENT Animal was adopted during an eventEXCHANGE Adopter returned one animal and adopted anotherFACEBOOK Adopter saw the animal on Facebook and came to MAS to adopt it.FEEDERS HL Cat was at Feeders Supply when it was adoptedFEEDERS PH Cat was at Feeders Supply when it was adoptedFIELDTRIP Adopter saw the animal on while on field trip and came to MAS to adopt it.FOSTER Adopter was fostering the animal and adopted it.FRIEND Adopter was referred by a friend to come to MAS to adoptINTERNET Adopter saw the animal on online and came to MAS to adopt it.NEWSLETTER Adopter saw the animal in our newsletter and came to MAS to adopt it.PETCO Animal was adopted during an event at PetcoPROMO Animal was adopted during a promotionPRV ADOPT Animal was adopted by a person who had previously adopted from MASPS HURST Animal was adopted during an event at PetSmartPS OUTER Animal was adopted during an event at PetSmartPS WEST Animal was adopted during an event at PetSmartRADIO MAX Citizen came to MAS to adopt an animal due hearing it on the radio station The MAXRADIO OTHER Citizen came to MAS to adopt an animal due hearing it on the radioRADIO WDJX Citizen came to MAS to adopt an animal due hearing it on the radio station WDJXRADIO WHAS Citizen came to MAS to adopt an animal due hearing it on the radioREFERRAL Citizen was referred to MAS by another organization. Examples being PetSmart, Kentucky Humane Society, etc.THIRDPARTY Citizen found an animal and wants to adopt it if the owner is not found.TV OTHER Citizen came to MAS to adopt an animal due to seeing it on TVTV METRO Citizen came to MAS to adopt an animal due to seeing it on METRO TVTV OTHER Citizen came to MAS to adopt an animal due to seeing it on TVTV WHAS Citizen came to MAS to adopt an animal due to seeing it on WHAS TVTV WLKY Citizen came to MAS to adopt an animal due to seeing it on WLKY TVWALK IN Citizen came to MAS to adopt an animal.WEB METRO Citizen came to MAS to adopt an animal due to seeing it on the Metro websiteWEB PF Citizen came to MAS to adopt an animal due to seeing it on PetFinderWEB PH Citizen came to MAS to adopt an animal due to seeing it on PetHarborDIED Animal diedAT VET Animal died while at a vetENROUTE Animal

About this Dataset

This is a collection of images and video frames of cheetahs at the Omaha Henry Doorly Zoo taken in October, 2020. The capture device was a SEEK Thermal Compact XR connected to an iPhone 11 Pro. Video frames were sampled and labeled by hand with bounding boxes for object detection using Robofow.

Using this Dataset

We have provided the dataset for download under a creative commons by-attribution license. You may use this dataset in any project (including for commercial use) but must cite Roboflow as the source.

Example Use Cases

This dataset could be used for conservation of endangered species, cataloging animals with a trail camera, gathering statistics on wildlife behavior, or experimenting with other thermal and infrared imagery.

About Roboflow

Roboflow creates tools that make computer vision easy to use for any developer, even if you're not a machine learning expert. You can use it to organize, label, inspect, convert, and export your image datasets. And even to train and deploy computer vision models with no code required.