This dataset was originally collected for a data science and machine learning project that aimed at investigating the potential correlation between the amount of time an individual spends on social media and the impact it has on their mental health.

The project involves conducting a survey to collect data, organizing the data, and using machine learning techniques to create a predictive model that can determine whether a person should seek professional help based on their answers to the survey questions.

This project was completed as part of a Statistics course at a university, and the team is currently in the process of writing a report and completing a paper that summarizes and discusses the findings in relation to other research on the topic.

The following is the Google Colab link to the project, done on Jupyter Notebook -

https://colab.research.google.com/drive/1p7P6lL1QUw1TtyUD1odNR4M6TVJK7IYN

The following is the GitHub Repository of the project -

https://github.com/daerkns/social-media-and-mental-health

Libraries used for the Project -

Pandas
Numpy
Matplotlib
Seaborn
Sci-kit Learn

Description:

The "Daily Social Media Active Users" dataset provides a comprehensive and dynamic look into the digital presence and activity of global users across major social media platforms. The data was generated to simulate real-world usage patterns for 13 popular platforms, including Facebook, YouTube, WhatsApp, Instagram, WeChat, TikTok, Telegram, Snapchat, X (formerly Twitter), Pinterest, Reddit, Threads, LinkedIn, and Quora. This dataset contains 10,000 rows and includes several key fields that offer insights into user demographics, engagement, and usage habits.

Dataset Breakdown:

• Platform: The name of the social media platform where the user activity is tracked. It includes globally recognized platforms, such as Facebook, YouTube, and TikTok, that are known for their large, active user bases.

• Owner: The company or entity that owns and operates the platform. Examples include Meta for Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp, Google for YouTube, and ByteDance for TikTok.

• Primary Usage: This category identifies the primary function of each platform. Social media platforms differ in their primary usage, whether it's for social networking, messaging, multimedia sharing, professional networking, or more.

• Country: The geographical region where the user is located. The dataset simulates global coverage, showcasing users from diverse locations and regions. It helps in understanding how user behavior varies across different countries.

• Daily Time Spent (min): This field tracks how much time a user spends on a given platform on a daily basis, expressed in minutes. Time spent data is critical for understanding user engagement levels and the popularity of specific platforms.

• Verified Account: Indicates whether the user has a verified account. This feature mimics real-world patterns where verified users (often public figures, businesses, or influencers) have enhanced status on social media platforms.

• Date Joined: The date when the user registered or started using the platform. This data simulates user account history and can provide insights into user retention trends or platform growth over time.

Context and Use Cases:

• This synthetic dataset is designed to offer a privacy-friendly alternative for analytics, research, and machine learning purposes. Given the complexities and privacy concerns around using real user data, especially in the context of social media, this dataset offers a clean and secure way to develop, test, and fine-tune applications, models, and algorithms without the risks of handling sensitive or personal information.

Researchers, data scientists, and developers can use this dataset to:

• Model User Behavior: By analyzing patterns in daily time spent, verified status, and country of origin, users can model and predict social media engagement behavior.

• Test Analytics Tools: Social media monitoring and analytics platforms can use this dataset to simulate user activity and optimize their tools for engagement tracking, reporting, and visualization.

• Train Machine Learning Algorithms: The dataset can be used to train models for various tasks like user segmentation, recommendation systems, or churn prediction based on engagement metrics.

• Create Dashboards: This dataset can serve as the foundation for creating user-friendly dashboards that visualize user trends, platform comparisons, and engagement patterns across the globe.

• Conduct Market Research: Business intelligence teams can use the data to understand how various demographics use social media, offering valuable insights into the most engaged regions, platform preferences, and usage behaviors.

• Sources of Inspiration: This dataset is inspired by public data from industry reports, such as those from Statista, DataReportal, and other market research platforms. These sources provide insights into the global user base and usage statistics of popular social media platforms. The synthetic nature of this dataset allows for the use of realistic engagement metrics without violating any privacy concerns, making it an ideal tool for educational, analytical, and research purposes.

The structure and design of the dataset are based on real-world usage patterns and aim to represent a variety of users from different backgrounds, countries, and activity levels. This diversity makes it an ideal candidate for testing data-driven solutions and exploring social media trends.

Future Considerations:

As the social media landscape continues to evolve, this dataset can be updated or extended to include new platforms, engagement metrics, or user behaviors. Future iterations may incorporate features like post frequency, follower counts, engagement rates (likes, comments, shares), or even sentiment analysis from user-generated content.

By leveraging this dataset, analysts and data scientists can create better, more effective strategies ...

How many people use social media?

              Social media usage is one of the most popular online activities. In 2024, over five billion people were using social media worldwide, a number projected to increase to over six billion in 2028.

              Who uses social media?
              Social networking is one of the most popular digital activities worldwide and it is no surprise that social networking penetration across all regions is constantly increasing. As of January 2023, the global social media usage rate stood at 59 percent. This figure is anticipated to grow as lesser developed digital markets catch up with other regions
              when it comes to infrastructure development and the availability of cheap mobile devices. In fact, most of social media’s global growth is driven by the increasing usage of mobile devices. Mobile-first market Eastern Asia topped the global ranking of mobile social networking penetration, followed by established digital powerhouses such as the Americas and Northern Europe.

              How much time do people spend on social media?
              Social media is an integral part of daily internet usage. On average, internet users spend 151 minutes per day on social media and messaging apps, an increase of 40 minutes since 2015. On average, internet users in Latin America had the highest average time spent per day on social media.

              What are the most popular social media platforms?
              Market leader Facebook was the first social network to surpass one billion registered accounts and currently boasts approximately 2.9 billion monthly active users, making it the most popular social network worldwide. In June 2023, the top social media apps in the Apple App Store included mobile messaging apps WhatsApp and Telegram Messenger, as well as the ever-popular app version of Facebook.

Overview

This dataset captures the relationship between social media usage, screen-time behavior, and daily lifestyle factors such as sleep duration and interaction quality. It is useful for analyzing patterns that may influence mental well-being, digital habits, and behavioral trends among users.

The data contains individual-level entries with details like daily screen time, social media time, positive vs. negative interactions, demographic information, and sleep hours. It is ideal for:

• Exploratory data analysis
• Behavioral pattern modeling
• Correlation studies
• Prediction tasks (e.g., sleep prediction, mood trend analysis)
• Student ML/NLP/data analytics projects

Column Description:

How much time do people spend on social media?

              As of 2024, the average daily social media usage of internet users worldwide amounted to 143 minutes per day, down from 151 minutes in the previous year. Currently, the country with the most time spent on social media per day is Brazil, with online users spending an average of three hours and 49 minutes on social media each day. In comparison, the daily time spent with social media in
              the U.S. was just two hours and 16 minutes. Global social media usageCurrently, the global social network penetration rate is 62.3 percent. Northern Europe had an 81.7 percent social media penetration rate, topping the ranking of global social media usage by region. Eastern and Middle Africa closed the ranking with 10.1 and 9.6 percent usage reach, respectively.
              People access social media for a variety of reasons. Users like to find funny or entertaining content and enjoy sharing photos and videos with friends, but mainly use social media to stay in touch with current events friends. Global impact of social mediaSocial media has a wide-reaching and significant impact on not only online activities but also offline behavior and life in general.
              During a global online user survey in February 2019, a significant share of respondents stated that social media had increased their access to information, ease of communication, and freedom of expression. On the flip side, respondents also felt that social media had worsened their personal privacy, increased a polarization in politics and heightened everyday distractions.

This database is comprised of 951 participants who provided self-report data online in their school classrooms. The data was collected in 2016 and 2017. The dataset is comprised of 509 males (54%) and 442 females (46%). Their ages ranged from 12 to 16 years (M = 13.69, SD = 0.72). Seven participants did not report their age. The majority were born in Australia (N = 849, 89%). The next most common countries of birth were China (N = 24, 2.5%), the UK (N = 23, 2.4%), and the USA (N = 9, 0.9%). Data were drawn from students at five Australian independent secondary schools. The data contains item responses for the Spence Children’s Anxiety Scale (SCAS; Spence, 1998) which is comprised of 44 items. The Social media question asked about frequency of use with the question “How often do you use social media?”. The response options ranged from constantly to once a week or less. Items measuring Fear of Missing Out were included and incorporated the following five questions based on the APS Stress and Wellbeing in Australia Survey (APS, 2015). These were “When I have a good time it is important for me to share the details online; I am afraid that I will miss out on something if I don’t stay connected to my online social networks; I feel worried and uncomfortable when I can’t access my social media accounts; I find it difficult to relax or sleep after spending time on social networking sites; I feel my brain burnout with the constant connectivity of social media. Internal consistency for this measure was α = .81. Self compassion was measured using the 12-item short-form of the Self-Compassion Scale (SCS-SF; Raes et al., 2011). The data set has the option of downloading an excel file (composed of two worksheet tabs) or CSV files 1) Data and 2) Variable labels. References: Australian Psychological Society. (2015). Stress and wellbeing in Australia survey. https://www.headsup.org.au/docs/default-source/default-document-library/stress-and-wellbeing-in-australia-report.pdf?sfvrsn=7f08274d_4 Raes, F., Pommier, E., Neff, K. D., & Van Gucht, D. (2011). Construction and factorial validation of a short form of the self-compassion scale. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 18(3), 250-255. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.702 Spence, S. H. (1998). A measure of anxiety symptoms among children. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 36(5), 545-566. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7967(98)00034-5

this project to realized in Power Bi:

Suicide rates vary around the world Suicide rates vary widely between countries. The map shows this.

For some countries in Southern Africa and Eastern Europe, the estimated rates of suicide are high, with over 15 annual deaths per 100,000 people.

https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/kaggle-user-content/o/inbox%2F16731800%2F0ad0b0509ea3e47fa4fef0c0df5a7650%2Fgraph1.jpg?generation=1709580346519280&alt=media" alt="">

Meanwhile for other countries in Europe, South America and Asia, the estimated rates of suicide are lower, with under 10 annual deaths per 100,000 people.

The wide range in suicide rates around the world is likely the result of many factors. This includes differences in underlying mental health and treatment, personal and financial stress, restrictions on the means of suicide, recognition and awareness of suicide, and other factors.

https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/kaggle-user-content/o/inbox%2F16731800%2F4852c4fa7dd9966750113f508fa189ea%2Fgraph2_page-0001.jpg?generation=1709580403955230&alt=media" alt="">

WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT THIS DATA Suicide estimates come from death certificate data, using deaths that were classified under death codes for 'intentional self-harm' in the International Classification of Diseases (ICD). This includes people who had self-harmed but had not intended to die, and they may not be considered suicides by the country's particular legal definition. In many countries, deaths due to self-harm are highly underreported due to social stigma, cultural and legal concerns. Instead, these deaths are often misclassified in reported data, especially as deaths due to "events of undetermined intent", accidents, homicides, or unknown causes. To account for this, the WHO's Global Health Observatory reclassifies a proportion of deaths reported with those causes as suicides, according to the fraction that are estimated to be deaths by suicide. As a result, data on suicide rates represent a better estimate of how many people die from suicide.

https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/kaggle-user-content/o/inbox%2F16731800%2F70c55821265e5e2e25f693d3bb0d6520%2Fgraph3_page-0001.jpg?generation=1709580432933739&alt=media" alt="">

Suicides may still be underestimated after this adjustment, especially if they are misclassified as other types of deaths.2 This can also be why some countries appear to have rising suicide rates, if the rates of misclassification decline.

A global survey conducted in the third quarter of 2024 found that the main reason for using social media was to keep in touch with friends and family, with over 50.8 percent of social media users saying this was their main reason for using online networks. Overall, 39 percent of social media users said that filling spare time was their main reason for using social media platforms, whilst 34.5 percent of respondents said they used it to read news stories. Less than one in five users were on social platforms for the reason of following celebrities and influencers.

              The most popular social network

              Facebook dominates the social media landscape. The world's most popular social media platform turned 20 in February 2024, and it continues to lead the way in terms of user numbers. As of February 2025, the social network had over three billion global users. YouTube, Instagram, and WhatsApp follow, but none of these well-known brands can surpass Facebook’s audience size.
              Moreover, as of the final quarter of 2023, there were almost four billion Meta product users.

              Ever-evolving social media usage

              The utilization of social media remains largely gratuitous; however, companies have been encouraging users to become paid subscribers to reduce dependence on advertising profits. Meta Verified entices users by offering a blue verification badge and proactive account protection, among other things. X (formerly Twitter), Snapchat, and Reddit also offer users the chance to upgrade their social media accounts for a monthly free.

This case study is an analysis of how social media affects mental health and recommendations for healthy social media usage based on the insights gathered from the analysis. You will find here the csv file of the dataset used for the case study, the case study roadmap, data cleaning log including its R code, analysis documentation including its R code, and related presentation discussing the findings of the case study.

Credit (dataset acquired from): https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/souvikahmed071/social-media-and-mental-health

The global social media penetration rate in was forecast to continuously increase between 2024 and 2028 by in total 11.6 (+18.19 percent). After the ninth consecutive increasing year, the penetration rate is estimated to reach 75.31 and therefore a new peak in 2028. Notably, the social media penetration rate of was continuously increasing over the past years.

Social Media Disaster-Related Discussions

Detecting Relevant Content with Trusted Judgments

By CrowdFlower [source]

About this dataset

Welcome to the disaster tweets dataset! This collection of tweets holds a wealth of information about global disasters and their effects on people, governments, and organizations all over the world. With over 10,000 tweets collected and carefully annotated with labels of whether they reported an actual disaster or not, this dataset provides unique insight into what these events look like in terms of social media conversations.

This information is derived from a variety of key terms related to disaster events, such as “ablaze” and “pandemonium” which was used to gather each individual tweet for analysis. The columns for each tweet include detailed metadata about the user who posted it along with variables such as keyword relevance and location. Alongside all these attributes is the core text belonging to each individual tweet- giving you access to all sorts of stories from natural disasters, contagious disease outbreaks or conflicts between nations that can be found in one place!

So whatever you're looking for - whether it's observations about first-hand accounts or conducting research on public sentiment during a major event - this dataset offers you an invaluable source full of timely information that could potentially save lives down the line. So take your journey through this data now and embark upon discovering what devastation looks like through social media!

More Datasets

For more datasets, click here.

Featured Notebooks

• 🚨 Your notebook can be here! 🚨!

How to use the dataset

This dataset contains tweets related to disaster events, including the keyword, location, text, tweetid and userid. It provides insights into how people interact with each other on social media during a disaster. Using this dataset you can gain valuable insight into the dynamics of online communication in disasters and provide an important point of reference for future disaster management initiatives.

Research Ideas

• Analyzing the effectiveness of disaster relief and humanitarian aid efforts, by mapping tweets against public data of areas affected by disasters and donations made to help those affected.
• Developing advanced statistical models to predict the magnitude and impact of an oncoming natural disaster using keyword analysis in social media posts related to past disasters.
• Creating text-based classifiers to accurately detect disaster-related tweets in real-time, allowing emergency services providers early warning signs before a potential event occurs

Acknowledgements

If you use this dataset in your research, please credit the original authors. Data Source

License

Unknown License - Please check the dataset description for more information.

Columns

File: socialmedia-disaster-tweets-DFE.csv | Column name | Description | |:-----------------------|:-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | _golden | A boolean value indicating whether the tweet is a golden tweet or not. (Boolean) | | _unit_state | The state of the tweet (e.g. finalized, judged, etc.). (String) | | _trusted_judgments | The number of trusted judgments for the tweet. (Integer) | | _last_judgment_at | The date and time of the last judgment for the tweet. (DateTime) | | choose_one | The label assigned to the tweet (e.g. relevant, not relevant, etc.). (String) | | choose_one_gold | The gold label assigned to the tweet (e.g. relevant, not relevant, etc.). (String) | | keyword | The keyword associated with the tweet. (String) | | location | The location associated with the tweet. (String) | | text | The text content of the tweet. (String) |

Acknowledgements

If you use this dataset in your research, please credit the original authors. If you use this dataset in your research, please credit CrowdFlower.

For a summary of the case study, please go to "Portfolio Project".

Context

This data analysis was meant to show that men have their own issues in society that are being ignored. The mental health has been declining especially for men. This decline worldwide maybe due to a multitude of other variables that may correlate such as: internet usage/social media usage, social belonging, work hours, dating apps, and physical health. This data analysis was meant to show that men have their own issues in society that are being ignored. This decline worldwide maybe due to a multitude of other variables that may correlate such as: internet usage/social media usage, social belonging, work hours, dating apps, and physical health. These variables may require a separate dataset going into more detail about them.

A space dedicated just for men and another just for women to speak about their problems with help and constructive criticism for growth and for social belonging maybe required to improve the mental health of society (among other variables). This does not mean that the struggles of women are nonexistent. There are already a multitude of datasets and articles dedicated to some of the possible struggles of women from MSNBC, CNN, NBC, BBC, Netflix movies, and even popular secular music like recent songs WAP from Megan Thee Stallion, God is a Women by Arianna Grande, etc. This dataset's objective was not made to continue to light a flame between the already hostile relationships that modern men and women have with each other. Awareness without bias is the goal.

For the results, please read the portfolio project and leave comments.

Content

Where the data were obtained:

1. The first excel file was obtained from https://data.world/vizzup/mental-health-depression-disorder-data/workspace/file?filename=Mental+health+Depression+disorder+Data.xlsx

2. The second excel file was obtained from https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/male-vs-female-suicide

3. The third excel file was obtained from https://ourworldindata.org/suicide

4. The fourth excel file was obtained from https://ourworldindata.org/drug-use

Inspiration

I want to be the best data analyst ever, so criticism (regardless of the harshness), it will be greatly appreciated. What would you have added/improved on? Was it easy to understand? What else do you want me to make a dataset on?

During a 2024 survey, 77 percent of respondents from Nigeria stated that they used social media as a source of news. In comparison, just 23 percent of Japanese respondents said the same. Large portions of social media users around the world admit that they do not trust social platforms either as media sources or as a way to get news, and yet they continue to access such networks on a daily basis.

              Social media: trust and consumption

              Despite the majority of adults surveyed in each country reporting that they used social networks to keep up to date with news and current affairs, a 2018 study showed that social media is the least trusted news source in the world. Less than 35 percent of adults in Europe considered social networks to be trustworthy in this respect, yet more than 50 percent of adults in Portugal, Poland, Romania, Hungary, Bulgaria, Slovakia and Croatia said that they got their news on social media.

              What is clear is that we live in an era where social media is such an enormous part of daily life that consumers will still use it in spite of their doubts or reservations. Concerns about fake news and propaganda on social media have not stopped billions of users accessing their favorite networks on a daily basis.
              Most Millennials in the United States use social media for news every day, and younger consumers in European countries are much more likely to use social networks for national political news than their older peers.
              Like it or not, reading news on social is fast becoming the norm for younger generations, and this form of news consumption will likely increase further regardless of whether consumers fully trust their chosen network or not.

This dataset is compiled using this dataset from GitHub.

Data Description Table

NEW UPDATE:

Show your skills off in the Social Media Extremism Challenge @ https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/social-media-extremism-detection-challenge! Try your luck at tackling this challenging classification problem! After the competition is completed, we will be adding 200+ hand-labelled entries to this dataset so stay tuned!

We would like to thank Assistant Professor Leilani H. Gilpin (UC Santa Cruz) and the AIEA Lab for their guidance and support in the development of this dataset. —*Aditya Suresh, Anthony Lu, Vishnu Iyer*

About this data: Social media has seen an increasing rise in the quantity and intensity of extremist content throughout various different services. With cases such as the various different white supremacist movements across the world, recruitment for terrorist organizations through affiliated accounts, and a general sense of hate emerging through the modern era of polarization, it becomes increasingly vital to be able to recognize these patterns and adequately combat the harms of extremism digitally on a global scale.

Citations: Our dataset would not have been possible without the aid of an already preexisting dataset found on Kaggle, Version 1 of "Hate Speech Detection curated Dataset🤬" by Alban Nyantudre in 2023. The link can be found here: https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/waalbannyantudre/hate-speech-detection-curated-dataset/data. Accessed in 2025, it was truly essential to our work. With over 400,000 messages of real, cleaned posts, we would not have been able to source and label our data points without this crucial resource.

Classification: Our team hand labelled nearly 3,000 pieces of data from our sourced database of posts, filtering every on of them into a blanket tag of "EXTREMIST" and "NON_EXTREMIST." As many messages digitally utilize context in order to spread harmful rhetoric, we followed a general rule of classifying terms as extremist so long as they "provoked harm to a person or a group of people, whether it be through advocacy for violence, discrimination, or other hurtful sentiments, based off of a characteristic of the group."

Value of the data: This dataset can be utilized to create extremist sentiment analysis systems and machine learning algorithms, as it reflects on current linguistics, as stated by the source material for the data points themselves. In addition, it can be used as a benchmark for comparing with other extremism datasets and other extremist sentiment analysis systems.

Potential Errors: Although we feel very confident in our own labeling ability, a possibility of potentially wrong data points does exist due to the fact that these data points lack quantifiable identifiers and as such human errors are possible within the data. We do not believe this to occur often, but in full transparency is an issue that we endeavor to resolve in subsequent updates.

Many have argued that digital technologies such as smartphones and social media are addictive. We develop an economic model of digital addiction and estimate it using a randomized experiment. Temporary incentives to reduce social media use have persistent effects, suggesting social media are habit forming. Allowing people to set limits on their future screen time substantially reduces use, suggesting self-control problems. Additional evidence suggests people are inattentive to habit formation and partially unaware of self-control problems. Looking at these facts through the lens of our model suggests that self-control problems cause 31 percent of social media use.

Dataset

This dataset was created by MosesNzoo

Released under MIT

Contents

This database is comprised of 603 participants who provided self-report data online in their school classrooms. The data was collected in 2016 and 2017. The dataset is comprised of 208 males (34%) and 395 females (66%). Their ages ranged from 12 to 15 years. Their age in years at baseline is provided. The majority were born in Australia. Data were drawn from students at two Australian independent secondary schools. The data contains total responses for the following scales: The Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale (IUS-12; Short form; Carleton et al, 2007) is a 12-item scale measuring two dimensions of Prospective and Inhibitory intolerance of uncertainty. Two subscales of the Children’s Automatic Thoughts Scale (CATS; Schniering & Rapee, 2002) were administered. The Peronalising and Social Threat were each composed of 10 items. UPPS Impulsive Behaviour Scale (Whiteside & Lynam, 2001) which is comprised of 12 items. Dispositional Envy Scale (DES; Smith et al, 1999) which is comprised of 8 items. Spence Children’s Anxiety Scale (SCAS; Spence, 1998) which is comprised of 44 items. Three subscales totals included were the GAD subscale (labelled SCAS_GAD), the OCD subscale (labelled SCAS_OCD) and the Social Anxiety subscale (labelled SCAS_SA). Each subscale was comprised of 6 items. Avoidance and Fusion Questionnaire for Youth (AFQ-Y; Greco et al., 2008) which is comprised of 17 items. Distress Disclosure Index (DDI; Kahn & Hessling, 2001) which is comprised of 12 items. Repetitive Thinking Questionnaire-10 (RTQ-10; McEvoy et al., 2014) which is comprised of 10 items. The Brief Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale, Straightforward Items (BFNE-S; Rodebaugh et al., 2004) which is comprised of 8 items. Short Mood and Feelings Questionnaire (SMFQ; Angold et al., 1995) which is comprised by 13 items. The Self-Compassion Scale Short Form (SCS-SF; Raes et al., 2011) which is comprised by 12 items. The subscales include Self Kindness, Self Judgment, Social Media subscales - These subscale scores were based on social media questions composed for this project and also drawn from three separate scales as indicated in the table below. The original scales assessed whether participants experience discomfort and a fear of missing out when disconnected from social media (taken from the Australian Psychological Society Stress and Wellbeing Survey; Australian Psychological Society, 2015a), style of social media use (Tandoc et al., 2015b) and Fear of Missing Out (Przybylski et al., 2013c). The items in each subscale are listed below. Pub_Share Public Sharing When I have a good time it is important for me to share the details onlinec On social media how often do you write a status updateb On social media how often do you post photosb Surveillance_SM On social media how often do you read the newsfeed On social media how often do you read a friend’s status updateb On social media how often do you view a friend’s photob On social media how often do you browse a friend’s timelineb Upset Share On social media how often do you go online to share things that have upset you? Text private On social media how often do you Text friends privately to share things that have upset you? Insight_SM Social Media Reduction I use social media less now because it often made me feel inadequate FOMO I am afraid that I will miss out on something if I don’t stay connected to my online social networksa. I feel worried and uncomfortable when I can’t access my social media accountsa. Neg Eff of SM I find it difficult to relax or sleep after spending time on social networking sitesa. I feel my brain ‘burnout’ with the constant connectivity of social mediaa. I notice I feel envy when I use social media.
I can easily detach from the envy that appears following the use of social media (reverse scored) DES_SM Envy Mean acts online Feeling envious about another person has led me to post a comment online about another person to make them laugh Feeling envious has led me to post a photo online without someone’s permission to make them angry or to make fun of them Feeling envious has prompted me to keep another student out of things on purpose, excluding her from my group of friends or ignoring them. Substance Use: Two items measuring peer influence on alcohol consumption were adapted from the SHAHRP “Patterns of Alcohol Use” measure (McBride, Farringdon & Midford, 2000). These items were “When I am with friends I am quite likely to drink too much alcohol” and “Substances (alcohol, drugs, medication) are the immediate way I respond to my thoughts about a situation when I feel distressed or upset. Angold, A., Costello, E. J., Messer, S. C., & Pickles, A. (1995). Development of a short questionnaire for use in epidemiological studies of depression in children and adolescents. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 5(4), 237–249. Australian Psychological Society. (2015). Stress and wellbeing in Australia survey. https://www.headsup.org.au/docs/default-source/default-document-library/stress-and-wellbeing-in-australia-report.pdf?sfvrsn=7f08274d_4 Greco, L.A., Lambert, W. & Baer., R.A. (2008) Psychological inflexibility in childhood and adolescence: Development and evaluation of the Avoidance and Fusion Questionnaire for Youth. Psychological Assessment, 20, 93-102. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.20.2.9 Kahn, J. H., & Hessling, R. M. (2001). Measuring the tendency to conceal versus disclose psychological distress. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 20(1), 41–65. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.20.1.41.22254 McBride, N., Farringdon, F. & Midford, R. (2000) What harms do young Australians experience in alcohol use situations. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 24, 54–60 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-842x.2000.tb00723.x McEvoy, P.M., Thibodeau, M.A., Asmundson, G.J.G. (2014) Trait Repetitive Negative Thinking: A brief transdiagnostic assessment. Journal of Experimental Psychopathology, 5, 1-17. Doi. 10.5127/jep.037813 Przybylski, A. K., Murayama, K., DeHaan, C. R., & Gladwell, V. (2013). Motivational, emotional, and behavioral correlates of fear of missing out. Computers in human behavior, 29(4), 1841-1848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.02.014 Raes, F., Pommier, E., Neff, K. D., & Van Gucht, D. (2011). Construction and factorial validation of a short form of the self-compassion scale. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 18(3), 250-255. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.702 Rodebaugh, T. L., Woods, C. M., Thissen, D. M., Heimberg, R. G., Chambless, D. L., & Rapee, R. M. (2004). More information from fewer questions: the factor structure and item properties of the original and brief fear of negative evaluation scale. Psychological assessment, 16(2), 169. https://doi.org/10.1037/10403590.16.2.169 Schniering, C. A., & Rapee, R. M. (2002). Development and validation of a measure of children’s automatic thoughts: the children’s automatic thoughts scale. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 40(9), 1091-1109. . https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7967(02)00022-0 Smith, R. H., Parrott, W. G., Diener, E. F., Hoyle, R. H., & Kim, S. H. (1999). Dispositional envy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(8), 1007-1020. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672992511008 Spence, S. H. (1998). A measure of anxiety symptoms among children. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 36(5), 545-566. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7967(98)00034-5 Tandoc, E. C., Ferrucci, P., & Duffy, M. (2015). Facebook use, envy, and depression among college students: Is facebooking depressing? Computers in Human Behavior, 43, 139–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.10.053 Whiteside, S.P. & Lynam, D.R. (2001) The five factor model and impulsivity: using a structural model of personality to understand impulsivity. Personality and Individual Differences 30,669-689. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00064-7 The data was collected by Dr Danielle A Einstein, Dr Madeleine Fraser, Dr Anne McMaugh, Prof Peter McEvoy, Prof Ron Rapee, Assoc/Prof Maree Abbott, Prof Warren Mansell and Dr Eyal Karin as part of the Insights Project. The data set has the option of downloading an excel file (composed of two worksheet tabs) or CSV files 1) Data and 2) Variable labels.

Social media platforms have become integral tools in the conduct of foreign policy for many nations, including India. This dataset serves as a resource for analyzing ‘Social Media and India’s Foreign Policy: The Case Study of ‘X’ Diplomacy during the Covid-19 Pandemic.’ The data were collected through a web-based questionnaire distributed primarily to people aged 18 – 61 and above in India. A total of 171 valid data were collected from 17 states offering extensive geographic coverage and stored in Mendeley. The 15 contributor states are Goa, Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu, Gujarat, Delhi, Assam, Haryana, Jammu and Kashmir, Karnataka, Kerala, Punjab, Rajasthan, Tripura, Uttar Pradesh and West Bengal. It encompasses diverse question formats, including single-choice, multiple-choice, quizzes, and open-ended. The study underscores the opportunities and challenges of employing 'X' diplomacy in India's foreign policy. Thus, there were two hypotheses. First, India's effective use of 'X' diplomacy positively impacts public perception of India's foreign policy effectiveness. Second, India's adept use of 'X' diplomacy during the COVID-19 pandemic enhances its ability to manage and respond to the crisis effectively. This data shows public perception of the effective use of social media by the Government of India, particularly in the crisis situation. Data also highlight the significant change in India’s narrative through its ‘X’ diplomacy, effectively setting the narratives, public perceptions, and diplomatic strategies. This data can be fully utilized in the study of the significance of social media in India’s foreign policy, the role of social media like ‘X’ in the making of India’s foreign policy, how effective social media like ‘X’ was during the Covid-19 pandemic and how Indian government utilized social media like ‘X’ to delivered messages and to set the narrative in the international politics.