Facebook
Twitterhttps://spdx.org/licenses/CC0-1.0.htmlhttps://spdx.org/licenses/CC0-1.0.html
AbstractIn Italy, approximately 400.000 new cases of malignant tumors are recorded every year. The average of annual deaths caused by tumors, according to the Italian Cancer Registers, is about 3.5 deaths and about 2.5 per 1,000 men and women respectively, for a total of about 3 deaths every 1,000 people. Long-term (at least a decade) and spatially detailed data (up to the municipality scale) are neither easily accessible nor fully available for public consultation by the citizens, scientists, research groups, and associations. Therefore, here we present a ten-year (2009–2018) database on cancer mortality rates (in the form of Standardized Mortality Ratios, SMR) for 23 cancer macro-types in Italy on municipal, provincial, and regional scales. We aim to make easily accessible a comprehensive, ready-to-use, and openly accessible source of data on the most updated status of cancer mortality in Italy for local and national stakeholders, researchers, and policymakers and to provide researchers with ready-to-use data to perform specific studies. Methods For a given locality, year, and cause of death, the SMR is the ratio between the observed number of deaths (Om) and the number of expected deaths (Em): SMR = Om/Em (1) where Om should be an available observational data and Em is estimated as the weighted sum of age-specific population size for the given locality (ni) per age-specific death rates of the reference population (MRi): Em = sum(MRi x ni) (2) MRi could be provided by a public health organization or be estimated as the ratio between the age-specific number of deaths of reference population (Mi) to the age-specific reference population size (Ni): MRi = Mi/Ni (3) Thus, the value of Em is weighted by the age distribution of deaths and population size. SMR assumes value 1 when the number of observed and expected deaths are equal. Following eqns. (1-3), the SMR was computed for single years of the period 2009-2018 and for single cause of death as defined by the International ICD-10 classification system by using the following data: age-specific number of deaths by cause of reference population (i.e., Mi) from the Italian National Institute of Statistics (ISTAT, (http://www.istat.it/en/, last access: 26/01/2022)); age-specific census data on reference population (i.e., Ni) from ISTAT; the observed number of deaths by cause (i.e., Om) from ISTAT; the age-specific census data on population (ni); the SMR was estimated at three different level of aggregation: municipal, provincial (equivalent to the European classification NUTS 3) and regional (i.e., NUTS2). The SMR was also computed for the broad category of malignant tumors (i.e. C00-C979, hereinafter cancer macro-type C), and for the broad category of malignant tumor plus non-malignant tumors (i.e. C00-C979 plus D0-D489, hereinafter cancer macro-type CD). Lower 90% and 95% confidence intervals of 10-year average values were computed according to the Byar method.
Facebook
TwitterMIT Licensehttps://opensource.org/licenses/MIT
License information was derived automatically
****Upvote above**** 👍
https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/kaggle-user-content/o/inbox%2F13496874%2Fd56f59efa72d43a3da3ae7349235b429%2FScreenshot%202024-03-12%20211249.png?generation=1710258188677782&alt=media" alt="">
Video on Risk factors of Lung Cancer - ![https://youtu.be/0vVRp5eNDlA?feature=shared]
Dataset: 1. GENDER: Gender of the individual (M: Male, F: Female) 2. AGE: Age of the individual 3. SMOKING: Smoking status (2: Yes, 1: No) 4. YELLOW_FINGERS: Presence of yellow fingers (2: Yes, 1: No) 5. ANXIETY: Anxiety level (2: High, 1: Low) 6. PEER_PRESSURE: Peer pressure level (2: High, 1: Low) 7. CHRONIC DISEASE: Presence of chronic disease (2: Yes, 1: No) 8. FATIGUE: Fatigue level (2: High, 1: Low) 9. ALLERGY: Allergy status (2: Yes, 1: No) 10. WHEEZING: Wheezing condition (2: Yes, 1: No) 11. ALCOHOL CONSUMING: Alcohol consumption status (2: Yes, 1: No) 12. COUGHING: Presence of coughing (2: Yes, 1: No) 13. SHORTNESS OF BREATH: Shortness of breath condition (2: Yes, 1: No) 14. SWALLOWING DIFFICULTY: Difficulty in swallowing (2: Yes, 1: No) 15. CHEST PAIN: Presence of chest pain (2: Yes, 1: No) 16. LUNG_CANCER: Lung cancer diagnosis (2: Yes, 1: No)
Data has 309 rows and 16 columns with floating variables, integer, object which ranges from 0 - 308
Lung cancer is the uncontrollable growth of abnormal cells in one or both of the lungs. Cigarette smoking causes most lung cancers when smoke gets in the lungs. Lung cancer kills 1.8 million people each year, more than any other cancer. It has an 80-90% death rate, and is the leading cause of cancer death in men, and the second leading cause of cancer death in women.
The global cancer burden is estimated to have risen to 18.1 million new cases and 9.6 million deaths in 2018. One in 5 men and one in 6 women worldwide develop cancer during their lifetime, and one in 8 men and one in 11 women die from the disease. Worldwide, the total number of people who are alive within 5 years of a cancer diagnosis, called the 5-year prevalence, is estimated to be 43.8 million.
Facebook
TwitterNumber and rate of new cancer cases diagnosed annually from 1992 to the most recent diagnosis year available. Included are all invasive cancers and in situ bladder cancer with cases defined using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Groups for Primary Site based on the World Health Organization International Classification of Diseases for Oncology, Third Edition (ICD-O-3). Random rounding of case counts to the nearest multiple of 5 is used to prevent inappropriate disclosure of health-related information.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
Breast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer and the most frequent cause for cancer-related deaths in women worldwide. Globally, breast cancer accounted for 2.08 million out of 18.08 million new cancer cases (incidence rate of 11.6%) and 626,679 out of 9.55 million cancer-related deaths (6.6% of all cancer-related deaths) in 2018. 1,2 In India, breast cancer has surpassed cancers of the cervix and the oral cavity to be the most common cancer and the leading cause of cancer deaths. In 2018, 159,500 new cases of breast cancer were diagnosed, representing 27.7% of all new cancers among Indian women and 11.1% of all cancer deaths.
In india breast cancer cases reporting and diagnotics have increased 10 times in past 3 years . All thanks to the various cancer awareness initiatives by both private and govt. organisations.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
License information was derived automatically
This dataset, released February 2021, contains the statistics of premature mortality by various causes for people below 75 years, over the years 2014 to 2018. Causes for death include cancer (colorectal, lung, breast), diabetes, circulatory system diseases (ischaemic heart disease, cerebrovascular disease), respiratory system diseases (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), and external causes (road traffic injuries, suicide and self-inflicted injuries) The data is by Local Government Area (LGA) 2016 geographic boundaries. For more information please see the data source notes on the data. Source: Data compiled by PHIDU from deaths data based on the 2014 to 2018 Cause of Death Unit Record Files supplied by the Australian Coordinating Registry and the Victorian Department of Justice, on behalf of the Registries of Births, Deaths and Marriages and the National Coronial Information System. The population is the ABS Estimated Resident Population (ERP) for Australia, 30 June 2014 to 30 June 2018. AURIN has spatially enabled the original data. Data that was not shown/not applicable/not published/not available for the specific area ('#', '..', '^', 'np, 'n.a.', 'n.y.a.' in original PHIDU data) was removed.It has been replaced by by Blank cells. For other keys and abbreviations refer to PHIDU Keys.
Facebook
TwitterNote: DPH is updating and streamlining the COVID-19 cases, deaths, and testing data. As of 6/27/2022, the data will be published in four tables instead of twelve. The COVID-19 Cases, Deaths, and Tests by Day dataset contains cases and test data by date of sample submission. The death data are by date of death. This dataset is updated daily and contains information back to the beginning of the pandemic. The data can be found at https://data.ct.gov/Health-and-Human-Services/COVID-19-Cases-Deaths-and-Tests-by-Day/g9vi-2ahj. The COVID-19 State Metrics dataset contains over 93 columns of data. This dataset is updated daily and currently contains information starting June 21, 2022 to the present. The data can be found at https://data.ct.gov/Health-and-Human-Services/COVID-19-State-Level-Data/qmgw-5kp6 . The COVID-19 County Metrics dataset contains 25 columns of data. This dataset is updated daily and currently contains information starting June 16, 2022 to the present. The data can be found at https://data.ct.gov/Health-and-Human-Services/COVID-19-County-Level-Data/ujiq-dy22 . The COVID-19 Town Metrics dataset contains 16 columns of data. This dataset is updated daily and currently contains information starting June 16, 2022 to the present. The data can be found at https://data.ct.gov/Health-and-Human-Services/COVID-19-Town-Level-Data/icxw-cada . To protect confidentiality, if a town has fewer than 5 cases or positive NAAT tests over the past 7 days, those data will be suppressed. COVID-19 cases and associated deaths that have been reported among Connecticut residents, broken down by race and ethnicity. All data in this report are preliminary; data for previous dates will be updated as new reports are received and data errors are corrected. Deaths reported to the either the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner (OCME) or Department of Public Health (DPH) are included in the COVID-19 update. The following data show the number of COVID-19 cases and associated deaths per 100,000 population by race and ethnicity. Crude rates represent the total cases or deaths per 100,000 people. Age-adjusted rates consider the age of the person at diagnosis or death when estimating the rate and use a standardized population to provide a fair comparison between population groups with different age distributions. Age-adjustment is important in Connecticut as the median age of among the non-Hispanic white population is 47 years, whereas it is 34 years among non-Hispanic blacks, and 29 years among Hispanics. Because most non-Hispanic white residents who died were over 75 years of age, the age-adjusted rates are lower than the unadjusted rates. In contrast, Hispanic residents who died tend to be younger than 75 years of age which results in higher age-adjusted rates. The population data used to calculate rates is based on the CT DPH population statistics for 2019, which is available online here: https://portal.ct.gov/DPH/Health-Information-Systems--Reporting/Population/Population-Statistics. Prior to 5/10/2021, the population estimates from 2018 were used. Rates are standardized to the 2000 US Millions Standard population (data available here: https://seer.cancer.gov/stdpopulations/). Standardization was done using 19 age groups (0, 1-4, 5-9, 10-14, ..., 80-84, 85 years and older). More information about direct standardization for age adjustment is available here: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/statnt/statnt06rv.pdf Categories are mutually exclusive. The category “multiracial” includes people who answered ‘yes’ to more than one race category. Counts may not add up to total case counts as data on race and ethnicity may be missing. Age adjusted rates calculated only for groups with more than 20 deaths. Abbreviation: NH=Non-Hispanic. Data on Connecticut deaths were obtained from the Connecticut Deaths Registry maintained by the DPH Office of Vital Records. Cause of death was determined by a death certifier (e.g., physician, APRN, medical
Facebook
TwitterAccording to the data, the number of individuals who died from a tumor in Italy decreased constantly between 2006 and 2021. Indeed, the rate of deaths due to cancer among Italians dropped from **** deaths per 10,000 inhabitants in 2006 to **** in 2021. Moreover, in Italy, the cancer mortality rates among women and men are lower than the ones observed in the European Union. Women’s cancer Breast cancer is the most common and deadliest type of cancer among women in Italy. As a matter of fact, around *** thousand women in Italy were living with a diagnosis of breast cancer in 2023, and over **** thousand died from it in 2022. Colorectal and lung cancer follow in the list of the most frequently diagnosed cancers among females in Italy. Men’s cancer The most frequently diagnosed cancer among males in Italy is prostate cancer. Lung cancer, which is also the deadliest type of cancer for men, follows. As of 2023, the number of men living with a diagnosis of prostate cancer in Italy amounted to *** thousand, while the number of new cases of prostate cancer during that year was estimated at **** thousand.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
The role of religion and politics in the responses to the coronavirus pandemic raises the question of their influence on the risk of other diseases. This study focuses on age-adjusted death rates of cancer, heart disease, and infant mortality per 1000 live births before the pandemic (2018-2019) and COVID-19 in 2020-2021. Eight hypothesized predictors of health effects were analyzed by examining their correlation to age-adjusted death rates among U.S. states, percentage who pray once or more daily, Republican influence on state health policies as indicated by the percentage vote for Trump in 2016, percent of household incomes below poverty, median family income divided by a cost-of-living index, the Gini income inequality index, urban concentration of the population, physicians per capita, and public health expenditures per capita. Since prayer for divine intervention is common to otherwise diverse religious beliefs and practices, the percentage of people claiming to pray daily in each state was used to indicate potential religious influence. All of the death rates were higher in states where more people claimed to pray daily, and where Trump received a larger percentage of the vote. Except for COVID-19, the death rates were consistently lower in states with higher public health expenditures per capita. Only COVID-19 was correlated to physicians per capita, lower where there were more physicians. Corrected statistically for the other factors, income per cost of living explains no variance. Heart disease and COVID-19 death rates were higher in areas with more income inequality. All of the disease rates were in correlation with more rural populations. Correlation of daily prayer with smoking cigarettes, and neglect of public health recommendations for fruit and vegetable consumption and COVID-19 vaccination suggests that prayer may be substituted for preventive practices.
Facebook
TwitterThis dataset contains information on patients with lung cancer, including their age, gender, air pollution exposure, alcohol use, dust allergy, occupational hazards, genetic risk, chronic lung disease, balanced diet, obesity, smoking, passive smoker, chest pain, coughing of blood, fatigue, weight loss ,shortness of breath ,wheezing ,swallowing difficulty ,clubbing of finger nails and snoring
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death worldwide, accounting for 1.59 million deaths in 2018. The majority of lung cancer cases are attributed to smoking, but exposure to air pollution is also a risk factor. A new study has found that air pollution may be linked to an increased risk of lung cancer, even in nonsmokers.
The study, which was published in the journal Nature Medicine, looked at data from over 462,000 people in China who were followed for an average of six years. The participants were divided into two groups: those who lived in areas with high levels of air pollution and those who lived in areas with low levels of air pollution.
The researchers found that the people in the high-pollution group were more likely to develop lung cancer than those in the low-pollution group. They also found that the risk was higher in nonsmokers than smokers, and that the risk increased with age.
While this study does not prove that air pollution causes lung cancer, it does suggest that there may be a link between the two. More research is needed to confirm these findings and to determine what effect different types and levels of air pollution may have on lung cancer risk
- predicting the likelihood of a patient developing lung cancer
- identifying risk factors for lung cancer
- determining the most effective treatment for a patient with lung cancer
License
See the dataset description for more information.
File: cancer patient data sets.csv | Column name | Description | |:-----------------------------|:--------------------------------------------------------------------| | Age | The age of the patient. (Numeric) | | Gender | The gender of the patient. (Categorical) | | Air Pollution | The level of air pollution exposure of the patient. (Categorical) | | Alcohol use | The level of alcohol use of the patient. (Categorical) | | Dust Allergy | The level of dust allergy of the patient. (Categorical) | | OccuPational Hazards | The level of occupational hazards of the patient. (Categorical) | | Genetic Risk | The level of genetic risk of the patient. (Categorical) | | chronic Lung Disease | The level of chronic lung disease of the patient. (Categorical) | | Balanced Diet | The level of balanced diet of the patient. (Categorical) | | Obesity | The level of obesity of the patient. (Categorical) | | Smoking | The level of smoking of the patient. (Categorical) | | Passive Smoker | The level of passive smoker of the patient. (Categorical) | | Chest Pain | The level of chest pain of the patient. (Categorical) | | Coughing of Blood | The level of coughing of blood of the patient. (Categorical) | | Fatigue | The level of fatigue of the patient. (Categorical) | | Weight Loss | The level of weight loss of the patient. (Categorical) | | Shortness of Breath | The level of shortness of breath of the patient. (Categorical) | | Wheezing | The level of wheezing of the patient. (Categorical) | | Swallowing Difficulty | The level of swallowing difficulty of the patient. (Categorical) | | Clubbing of Finger Nails | The level of clubbing of finger nails of the patient. (Categorical) |
Facebook
TwitterRank, number of deaths, percentage of deaths, and age-specific mortality rates for the leading causes of death, by age group and sex, 2000 to most recent year.
Facebook
TwitterCancer was responsible for around *** deaths per 100,000 population in the United States in 2023. The death rate for cancer has steadily decreased since the 1990’s, but cancer still remains the second leading cause of death in the United States. The deadliest type of cancer for both men and women is cancer of the lung and bronchus which will account for an estimated ****** deaths among men alone in 2025. Probability of surviving Survival rates for cancer vary significantly depending on the type of cancer. The cancers with the highest rates of survival include cancers of the thyroid, prostate, and testis, with five-year survival rates as high as ** percent for thyroid cancer. The cancers with the lowest five-year survival rates include cancers of the pancreas, liver, and esophagus. Risk factors It is difficult to determine why one person develops cancer while another does not, but certain risk factors have been shown to increase a person’s chance of developing cancer. For example, cigarette smoking has been proven to increase the risk of developing various cancers. In fact, around ** percent of cancers of the lung, bronchus and trachea among adults aged 30 years and older can be attributed to cigarette smoking. Other modifiable risk factors for cancer include being obese, drinking alcohol, and sun exposure.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
Cancer is a large group of diseases that can start in almost any organ or tissue of the body when abnormal cells grow uncontrollably, go beyond their usual boundaries to invade adjoining parts of the body and/or spread to other organs.
Cancer is the second leading cause of death globally, accounting for an estimated 9.6 million deaths, or one in six deaths, in 2018. Lung, prostate, colorectal, stomach and liver cancer are the most common types of cancer in men, while breast, colorectal, lung, cervical and thyroid cancer are the most common among women. (Source: WHO)
Dataset source : https://gco.iarc.fr/today/data/factsheets/populations/356-india-fact-sheets.pdf WHO
Facebook
TwitterThis table contains 4032 series, with data for years 1994/1998 - 2009/2013 (not all combinations necessarily have data for all years). This table contains data described by the following dimensions (Not all combinations are available): Geography (6 items: Canada; Inuit Nunangat; Inuvialuit Region; Nunavut; ...) Sex (3 items: Both sexes; Males; Females) Indicators (2 items: Mortality; Potential years of life lost) Selected causes of death (16 items: Total, all causes of death; All malignant neoplasms (cancers); Colorectal cancer; Lung cancer; ...) Characteristics (7 items: Number; Rate; Low 95% confidence interval, rate; High 95% confidence interval, rate; ...).
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
BackgroundWith approval of anti-PD-1/PD-L1, metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has entered the era of immunotherapy. Since immune-related adverse events (irAEs) occur commonly in patients receiving anti-PD-1/PD-L1, the landscape of death causes may have changed in metastatic NSCLC. We aim to compare patterns of death causes in metastatic NSCLC between the pre-immunotherapy and immunotherapy era to identify the consequent landscape transition of death causes.MethodsIn this cohort study, 298,48patients with metastatic NSCLC diagnosed between 2000 and 2018 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program. Unsupervised clustering with Bayesian inference method was performed for all patients’ death causes, which separated them into two death patterns: the pre-immunotherapy era group and the immunotherapy era group. Relative risk (RR) of each death cause between two groups was estimated using Poisson regression. Reduced death risk as survival time was calculated with locally weighted scatterplot smooth (Lowess) regression.ResultsTwo patterns of death causes were identified by unsupervised clustering for all patients. Thus, we separated them into two groups, the immunotherapy era (2015-2017, N=40,172) and the pre-immunotherapy era (2000-2011, N=166,321), in consideration of obscure availability to immunotherapy for patients diagnosed in 2012-2014, when the follow-up cutoff was set as three years. Although all-cause death risk had reduced (29.2%, 13.7% and 27.8% for death risks of lung cancer, non-cancer and other cancers), non-cancer deaths in the immunotherapy era (N=2,100, 5.2%; RR=1.155, 95%CI: 1.101-1.211, P
Facebook
Twitterhttps://digital.nhs.uk/about-nhs-digital/terms-and-conditionshttps://digital.nhs.uk/about-nhs-digital/terms-and-conditions
Directly age standardised mortality rate from breast cancer for females in the respective time period per 100,000 registered female patients. March 2020: In addition to the changes in March 2019, the indicator production process has been fully automated. As a result there are two changes to this publication: 1) Data in this file are published for 2016-2018 only; all data is based on the most recent methodology. For the historic time series of this indicator please refer to the zip files in the June 2018 publication: https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/publications/clinical-indicators/ccg-outcomes-indicator-set/archive/ccg-outcomes-indicator-set---june-2018 Please note, neither version of the file contains data for 2015-2017; changes in the data processing meant the 2015 data was not comparable to the 2016 and 2017 data processed under the new method. 2) Data are run against CCGs which were in existence at the time of processing. As of the March 2019 release the processing of the Primary Care Mortality Database (PCMD) and the standard population used to calculate the indicator for new data periods changed; this file now contains only those data periods processed under the new method. For the historic time series of this indicator please refer to the June 2018 publication referenced above. Legacy unique identifier: P01819
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Armenia AM: Mortality from CVD, Cancer, Diabetes or CRD between Exact Ages 30 and 70 data was reported at 20.600 % in 2021. This records a decrease from the previous number of 21.300 % for 2020. Armenia AM: Mortality from CVD, Cancer, Diabetes or CRD between Exact Ages 30 and 70 data is updated yearly, averaging 24.250 % from Dec 2000 (Median) to 2021, with 22 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 27.500 % in 2000 and a record low of 20.100 % in 2018. Armenia AM: Mortality from CVD, Cancer, Diabetes or CRD between Exact Ages 30 and 70 data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Armenia – Table AM.World Bank.WDI: Social: Health Statistics. Mortality from CVD, cancer, diabetes or CRD is the percent of 30-year-old-people who would die before their 70th birthday from any of cardiovascular disease, cancer, diabetes, or chronic respiratory disease, assuming that s/he would experience current mortality rates at every age and s/he would not die from any other cause of death (e.g., injuries or HIV/AIDS).;World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory Data Repository (http://apps.who.int/ghodata/).;Weighted average;This is the Sustainable Development Goal indicator 3.4.1 [https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/metadata/].
Facebook
TwitterPublic Health England (PHE) has updated the mortality profile
The profile brings together a selection of mortality indicators from other PHE data tools, including the https://fingertips.phe.org.uk/profile/public-health-outcomes-framework/data">Public Health Outcomes Framework, making it easier to assess outcomes across a range of causes of death.
The following indicators have been updated with data for 2016 to 2018:
The infant mortality rate for 2016 to 2018 has also been updated in both the https://fingertips.phe.org.uk/profile/public-health-outcomes-framework/data">Public Health Outcomes Framework and in the mortality profile.
If you would like to send us feedback on the tool please contact profilefeedback@phe.gov.uk
Facebook
TwitterCC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
License information was derived automatically
This study aimed to present and analyze the causes of death in the Korean population in 2018 through an analysis of cause-of-death data from Statistics Korea, which are classified based on the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th revision and the Korean Standard Classification of Diseases and Causes of Death. The total number of deaths was 298,820, reflecting an increase of 13,286 (4.7%) from 2017. The crude death rate was 582.5 per 100,000 population, which was an increase of 25.1 (4.5%) from 2017. The 10 leading causes of death, in order, were malignant neoplasms, heart diseases, pneumonia, cerebrovascular diseases, intentional self-harm, diabetes mellitus, liver diseases, chronic lower respiratory diseases, Alzheimer disease, and hypertensive diseases. Within the category of malignant neoplasms, the top five leading organs of involvement were the lung, liver, colon, stomach, and pancreas. Colon cancer was ranked as the third leading cause of death among malignant neoplasms. The most notable characteristics of the 2018 cause-of-death statistics were the ranking of pneumonia as the third leading cause of death, the inclusion of Alzheimer disease in the top 10 causes of death, and the exclusion of transport accidents from the 10 leading causes of death, which is a result that has not been seen since comparable statistics were first published in 1983. These changes reflect the increase of people over 65 years of age, who are vulnerable to infectious diseases, and improvements in Korean policies regarding safety measures for pedestrians and passengers.
Facebook
TwitterIn the United States in 2021, the death rate was highest among those aged 85 and over, with about 17,190.5 men and 14,914.5 women per 100,000 of the population passing away. For all ages, the death rate was at 1,118.2 per 100,000 of the population for males, and 970.8 per 100,000 of the population for women. The death rate Death rates generally are counted as the number of deaths per 1,000 or 100,000 of the population and include both deaths of natural and unnatural causes. The death rate in the United States had pretty much held steady since 1990 until it started to increase over the last decade, with the highest death rates recorded in recent years. While the birth rate in the United States has been decreasing, it is still currently higher than the death rate. Causes of death There are a myriad number of causes of death in the United States, but the most recent data shows the top three leading causes of death to be heart disease, cancers, and accidents. Heart disease was also the leading cause of death worldwide.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://digital.nhs.uk/about-nhs-digital/terms-and-conditionshttps://digital.nhs.uk/about-nhs-digital/terms-and-conditions
Directly age standardised mortality rate from breast cancer for females in the respective time period per 100,000 registered female patients. October 2022: This is the last CCGOIS publication. All Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs) were statutorily abolished on the 1 July 2022, and from this point all statutory obligations are managed by the Integrated Care Boards (ICBs). ICBs were established as statutory bodies from July 2022 and succeed Sustainability and Transformation Partnerships (STPs). These came into effect on 1 July 2022. A transition phase has been implemented from 1 July 2022, during which the 106 Organisation Data Service (ODS) codes that identified CCGs will be temporarily retained, but the names will be changed to identify the ‘Sub ICB Location’. March 2020: In addition to the changes in March 2019, the indicator production process has been fully automated. As a result there are two changes to this publication: 1) Data in this file are published for 2016-2018 only; all data is based on the most recent methodology. For the historic time series of this indicator please refer to the zip files in the June 2018 publication: https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/publications/clinical-indicators/ccg-outcomes-indicator-set/archive/ccg-outcomes-indicator-set---june-2018 Please note, neither version of the file contains data for 2015-2017; changes in the data processing meant the 2015 data was not comparable to the 2016 and 2017 data processed under the new method. 2) Data are run against CCGs which were in existence at the time of processing. As of the March 2019 release the processing of the Primary Care Mortality Database (PCMD) and the standard population used to calculate the indicator for new data periods changed; this file now contains only those data periods processed under the new method. For the historic time series of this indicator please refer to the June 2018 publication referenced above. Legacy unique identifier: P01819
Facebook
Twitterhttps://spdx.org/licenses/CC0-1.0.htmlhttps://spdx.org/licenses/CC0-1.0.html
AbstractIn Italy, approximately 400.000 new cases of malignant tumors are recorded every year. The average of annual deaths caused by tumors, according to the Italian Cancer Registers, is about 3.5 deaths and about 2.5 per 1,000 men and women respectively, for a total of about 3 deaths every 1,000 people. Long-term (at least a decade) and spatially detailed data (up to the municipality scale) are neither easily accessible nor fully available for public consultation by the citizens, scientists, research groups, and associations. Therefore, here we present a ten-year (2009–2018) database on cancer mortality rates (in the form of Standardized Mortality Ratios, SMR) for 23 cancer macro-types in Italy on municipal, provincial, and regional scales. We aim to make easily accessible a comprehensive, ready-to-use, and openly accessible source of data on the most updated status of cancer mortality in Italy for local and national stakeholders, researchers, and policymakers and to provide researchers with ready-to-use data to perform specific studies. Methods For a given locality, year, and cause of death, the SMR is the ratio between the observed number of deaths (Om) and the number of expected deaths (Em): SMR = Om/Em (1) where Om should be an available observational data and Em is estimated as the weighted sum of age-specific population size for the given locality (ni) per age-specific death rates of the reference population (MRi): Em = sum(MRi x ni) (2) MRi could be provided by a public health organization or be estimated as the ratio between the age-specific number of deaths of reference population (Mi) to the age-specific reference population size (Ni): MRi = Mi/Ni (3) Thus, the value of Em is weighted by the age distribution of deaths and population size. SMR assumes value 1 when the number of observed and expected deaths are equal. Following eqns. (1-3), the SMR was computed for single years of the period 2009-2018 and for single cause of death as defined by the International ICD-10 classification system by using the following data: age-specific number of deaths by cause of reference population (i.e., Mi) from the Italian National Institute of Statistics (ISTAT, (http://www.istat.it/en/, last access: 26/01/2022)); age-specific census data on reference population (i.e., Ni) from ISTAT; the observed number of deaths by cause (i.e., Om) from ISTAT; the age-specific census data on population (ni); the SMR was estimated at three different level of aggregation: municipal, provincial (equivalent to the European classification NUTS 3) and regional (i.e., NUTS2). The SMR was also computed for the broad category of malignant tumors (i.e. C00-C979, hereinafter cancer macro-type C), and for the broad category of malignant tumor plus non-malignant tumors (i.e. C00-C979 plus D0-D489, hereinafter cancer macro-type CD). Lower 90% and 95% confidence intervals of 10-year average values were computed according to the Byar method.