All cities with a population > 1000 or seats of adm div (ca 80.000)Sources and ContributionsSources : GeoNames is aggregating over hundred different data sources. Ambassadors : GeoNames Ambassadors help in many countries. Wiki : A wiki allows to view the data and quickly fix error and add missing places. Donations and Sponsoring : Costs for running GeoNames are covered by donations and sponsoring.Enrichment:add country name

About this dataset

Context

The dataset tabulates the data for the Grosse Pointe, MI population pyramid, which represents the Grosse Pointe population distribution across age and gender, using estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2019-2023 5-Year Estimates. It lists the male and female population for each age group, along with the total population for those age groups. Higher numbers at the bottom of the table suggest population growth, whereas higher numbers at the top indicate declining birth rates. Furthermore, the dataset can be utilized to understand the youth dependency ratio, old-age dependency ratio, total dependency ratio, and potential support ratio.

Key observations

• Youth dependency ratio, which is the number of children aged 0-14 per 100 persons aged 15-64, for Grosse Pointe, MI, is 43.6.
• Old-age dependency ratio, which is the number of persons aged 65 or over per 100 persons aged 15-64, for Grosse Pointe, MI, is 43.1.
• Total dependency ratio for Grosse Pointe, MI is 86.7.
• Potential support ratio, which is the number of youth (working age population) per elderly, for Grosse Pointe, MI is 2.3.

Content

When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2019-2023 5-Year Estimates.

Age groups:

• Under 5 years
• 5 to 9 years
• 10 to 14 years
• 15 to 19 years
• 20 to 24 years
• 25 to 29 years
• 30 to 34 years
• 35 to 39 years
• 40 to 44 years
• 45 to 49 years
• 50 to 54 years
• 55 to 59 years
• 60 to 64 years
• 65 to 69 years
• 70 to 74 years
• 75 to 79 years
• 80 to 84 years
• 85 years and over

Variables / Data Columns

• Age Group: This column displays the age group for the Grosse Pointe population analysis. Total expected values are 18 and are define above in the age groups section.
• Population (Male): The male population in the Grosse Pointe for the selected age group is shown in the following column.
• Population (Female): The female population in the Grosse Pointe for the selected age group is shown in the following column.
• Total Population: The total population of the Grosse Pointe for the selected age group is shown in the following column.

Good to know

Margin of Error

Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.

Custom data

If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.

Inspiration

Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.

Recommended for further research

This dataset is a part of the main dataset for Grosse Pointe Population by Age. You can refer the same here

This database, and the accompanying website called ‘SurgeWatch’ (http://surgewatch.stg.rlp.io), provides a systematic UK-wide record of high sea level and coastal flood events over the last 100 years (1915-2014). Derived using records from the National Tide Gauge Network, a dataset of exceedence probabilities from the Environment Agency and meteorological fields from the 20th Century Reanalysis, the database captures information of 96 storm events that generated the highest sea levels around the UK since 1915. For each event, the database contains information about: (1) the storm that generated that event; (2) the sea levels recorded around the UK during the event; and (3) the occurrence and severity of coastal flooding as consequence of the event. The data are presented to be easily assessable and understandable to a wide range of interested parties. The database contains 100 files; four CSV files and 96 PDF files. Two CSV files contain the meteorological and sea level data for each of the 96 events. A third file contains the list of the top 20 largest skew surges at each of the 40 study tide gauge site. In the file containing the sea level and skew surge data, the tide gauge sites are numbered 1 to 40. A fourth accompanying CSV file lists, for reference, the site name and location (longitude and latitude). A description of the parameters in each of the four CSV files is given in the table below. There are also 96 separate PDF files containing the event commentaries. For each event these contain a concise narrative of the meteorological and sea level conditions experienced during the event, and a succinct description of the evidence available in support of coastal flooding, with a brief account of the recorded consequences to people and property. In addition, these contain graphical representation of the storm track and mean sea level pressure and wind fields at the time of maximum high water, the return period and skew surge magnitudes at sites around the UK, and a table of the date and time, offset return period, water level, predicted tide and skew surge for each site where the 1 in 5 year threshold was reached or exceeded for each event. A detailed description of how the database was created is given in Haigh et al. (2015). Coastal flooding caused by extreme sea levels can be devastating, with long-lasting and diverse consequences. The UK has a long history of severe coastal flooding. The recent 2013-14 winter in particular, produced a sequence of some of the worst coastal flooding the UK has experienced in the last 100 years. At present 2.5 million properties and £150 billion of assets are potentially exposed to coastal flooding. Yet despite these concerns, there is no formal, national framework in the UK to record flood severity and consequences and thus benefit an understanding of coastal flooding mechanisms and consequences. Without a systematic record of flood events, assessment of coastal flooding around the UK coast is limited. The database was created at the School of Ocean and Earth Science, National Oceanography Centre, University of Southampton with help from the Faculty of Engineering and the Environment, University of Southampton, the National Oceanography Centre and the British Oceanographic Data Centre. Collation of the database and the development of the website was funded through a Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) impact acceleration grant. The database contributes to the objectives of UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) consortium project FLOOD Memory (EP/K013513/1).

About this dataset

Context

The dataset tabulates the data for the Richardson, TX population pyramid, which represents the Richardson population distribution across age and gender, using estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2019-2023 5-Year Estimates. It lists the male and female population for each age group, along with the total population for those age groups. Higher numbers at the bottom of the table suggest population growth, whereas higher numbers at the top indicate declining birth rates. Furthermore, the dataset can be utilized to understand the youth dependency ratio, old-age dependency ratio, total dependency ratio, and potential support ratio.

Key observations

• Youth dependency ratio, which is the number of children aged 0-14 per 100 persons aged 15-64, for Richardson, TX, is 25.3.
• Old-age dependency ratio, which is the number of persons aged 65 or over per 100 persons aged 15-64, for Richardson, TX, is 18.2.
• Total dependency ratio for Richardson, TX is 43.4.
• Potential support ratio, which is the number of youth (working age population) per elderly, for Richardson, TX is 5.5.

Content

When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2019-2023 5-Year Estimates.

Age groups:

• Under 5 years
• 5 to 9 years
• 10 to 14 years
• 15 to 19 years
• 20 to 24 years
• 25 to 29 years
• 30 to 34 years
• 35 to 39 years
• 40 to 44 years
• 45 to 49 years
• 50 to 54 years
• 55 to 59 years
• 60 to 64 years
• 65 to 69 years
• 70 to 74 years
• 75 to 79 years
• 80 to 84 years
• 85 years and over

Variables / Data Columns

• Age Group: This column displays the age group for the Richardson population analysis. Total expected values are 18 and are define above in the age groups section.
• Population (Male): The male population in the Richardson for the selected age group is shown in the following column.
• Population (Female): The female population in the Richardson for the selected age group is shown in the following column.
• Total Population: The total population of the Richardson for the selected age group is shown in the following column.

Good to know

Margin of Error

Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.

Custom data

If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.

Inspiration

Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.

Recommended for further research

This dataset is a part of the main dataset for Richardson Population by Age. You can refer the same here

Updates

• Notice of data discontinuation: Since the start of the pandemic, AP has reported case and death counts from data provided by Johns Hopkins University. Johns Hopkins University has announced that they will stop their daily data collection efforts after March 10. As Johns Hopkins stops providing data, the AP will also stop collecting daily numbers for COVID cases and deaths. The HHS and CDC now collect and visualize key metrics for the pandemic. AP advises using those resources when reporting on the pandemic going forward.

  • CDC Weekly case and death counts (national and state level)
  • CDC County level cases and deaths
  • HHS New hospital admissions
  • CDC NowCast COVID variant proportions (national and regional level)

• April 9, 2020

  • The population estimate data for New York County, NY has been updated to include all five New York City counties (Kings County, Queens County, Bronx County, Richmond County and New York County). This has been done to match the Johns Hopkins COVID-19 data, which aggregates counts for the five New York City counties to New York County.

• April 20, 2020

  • Johns Hopkins death totals in the US now include confirmed and probable deaths in accordance with CDC guidelines as of April 14. One significant result of this change was an increase of more than 3,700 deaths in the New York City count. This change will likely result in increases for death counts elsewhere as well. The AP does not alter the Johns Hopkins source data, so probable deaths are included in this dataset as well.

• April 29, 2020

  • The AP is now providing timeseries data for counts of COVID-19 cases and deaths. The raw counts are provided here unaltered, along with a population column with Census ACS-5 estimates and calculated daily case and death rates per 100,000 people. Please read the updated caveats section for more information.

• September 1st, 2020

  • Johns Hopkins is now providing counts for the five New York City counties individually.

• February 12, 2021

  • The Ohio Department of Health recently announced that as many as 4,000 COVID-19 deaths may have been underreported through the state’s reporting system, and that the "daily reported death counts will be high for a two to three-day period."
  • Because deaths data will be anomalous for consecutive days, we have chosen to freeze Ohio's rolling average for daily deaths at the last valid measure until Johns Hopkins is able to back-distribute the data. The raw daily death counts, as reported by Johns Hopkins and including the backlogged death data, will still be present in the new_deaths column.

• February 16, 2021

  - Johns Hopkins has reconciled Ohio's historical deaths data with the state.

  Overview

The AP is using data collected by the Johns Hopkins University Center for Systems Science and Engineering as our source for outbreak caseloads and death counts for the United States and globally.

The Hopkins data is available at the county level in the United States. The AP has paired this data with population figures and county rural/urban designations, and has calculated caseload and death rates per 100,000 people. Be aware that caseloads may reflect the availability of tests -- and the ability to turn around test results quickly -- rather than actual disease spread or true infection rates.

This data is from the Hopkins dashboard that is updated regularly throughout the day. Like all organizations dealing with data, Hopkins is constantly refining and cleaning up their feed, so there may be brief moments where data does not appear correctly. At this link, you’ll find the Hopkins daily data reports, and a clean version of their feed.

The AP is updating this dataset hourly at 45 minutes past the hour.

To learn more about AP's data journalism capabilities for publishers, corporations and financial institutions, go here or email kromano@ap.org.

Queries

Use AP's queries to filter the data or to join to other datasets we've made available to help cover the coronavirus pandemic

• Filter cases by state here

• Rank states by their status as current hotspots. Calculates the 7-day rolling average of new cases per capita in each state: https://data.world/associatedpress/johns-hopkins-coronavirus-case-tracker/workspace/query?queryid=481e82a4-1b2f-41c2-9ea1-d91aa4b3b1ac

• Find recent hotspots within your state by running a query to calculate the 7-day rolling average of new cases by capita in each county: https://data.world/associatedpress/johns-hopkins-coronavirus-case-tracker/workspace/query?queryid=b566f1db-3231-40fe-8099-311909b7b687&showTemplatePreview=true

• Join county-level case data to an earlier dataset released by AP on local hospital capacity here. To find out more about the hospital capacity dataset, see the full details.

• Pull the 100 counties with the highest per-capita confirmed cases here

• Rank all the counties by the highest per-capita rate of new cases in the past 7 days here. Be aware that because this ranks per-capita caseloads, very small counties may rise to the very top, so take into account raw caseload figures as well.

Interactive

The AP has designed an interactive map to track COVID-19 cases reported by Johns Hopkins.

@(https://datawrapper.dwcdn.net/nRyaf/15/)

Interactive Embed Code

<iframe title="USA counties (2018) choropleth map Mapping COVID-19 cases by county" aria-describedby="" id="datawrapper-chart-nRyaf" src="https://datawrapper.dwcdn.net/nRyaf/10/" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" style="width: 0; min-width: 100% !important;" height="400"></iframe><script type="text/javascript">(function() {'use strict';window.addEventListener('message', function(event) {if (typeof event.data['datawrapper-height'] !== 'undefined') {for (var chartId in event.data['datawrapper-height']) {var iframe = document.getElementById('datawrapper-chart-' + chartId) || document.querySelector("iframe[src*='" + chartId + "']");if (!iframe) {continue;}iframe.style.height = event.data['datawrapper-height'][chartId] + 'px';}}});})();</script>

Caveats

• This data represents the number of cases and deaths reported by each state and has been collected by Johns Hopkins from a number of sources cited on their website.
• In some cases, deaths or cases of people who've crossed state lines -- either to receive treatment or because they became sick and couldn't return home while traveling -- are reported in a state they aren't currently in, because of state reporting rules.
• In some states, there are a number of cases not assigned to a specific county -- for those cases, the county name is "unassigned to a single county"
• This data should be credited to Johns Hopkins University's COVID-19 tracking project. The AP is simply making it available here for ease of use for reporters and members.
• Caseloads may reflect the availability of tests -- and the ability to turn around test results quickly -- rather than actual disease spread or true infection rates.
• Population estimates at the county level are drawn from 2014-18 5-year estimates from the American Community Survey.
• The Urban/Rural classification scheme is from the Center for Disease Control and Preventions's National Center for Health Statistics. It puts each county into one of six categories -- from Large Central Metro to Non-Core -- according to population and other characteristics. More details about the classifications can be found here.

Johns Hopkins timeseries data - Johns Hopkins pulls data regularly to update their dashboard. Once a day, around 8pm EDT, Johns Hopkins adds the counts for all areas they cover to the timeseries file. These counts are snapshots of the latest cumulative counts provided by the source on that day. This can lead to inconsistencies if a source updates their historical data for accuracy, either increasing or decreasing the latest cumulative count. - Johns Hopkins periodically edits their historical timeseries data for accuracy. They provide a file documenting all errors in their timeseries files that they have identified and fixed here

Attribution

This data should be credited to Johns Hopkins University COVID-19 tracking project

The Rural Access Index (RAI) is a measure of access, developed by the World Bank in 2006. It was adopted as Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) indicator 9.1.1 in 2015, to measure the accessibility of rural populations. It is currently the only indicator for the SDGs that directly measures rural access.The RAI measures the proportion of the rural population that lives within 2 km of an all-season road. An all-season road is one that is motorable all year, but may be temporarily unavailable during inclement weather (Roberts, Shyam, & Rastogi, 2006). This dataset implements and expands on the most recent official methodology put forward by the World Bank, ReCAP's 2019 RAI Supplemental Guidelines. This is, to date, the only publicly available application of this method at a global scale.MethodologyReCAP's methodology provided new insight on what makes a road all-season and how this data should be handled: instead of removing unpaved roads from the network, the ones that are classified as unpaved are to be intersected with topographic and climatic conditions and, whenever there’s an overlap with excess precipitation and slope, a multiplying factor ranging from 0% to 100% is applied to the population that would access to that road. This present dataset developed by SDSN's SDG Transformation Centre proposes that authorities ability to maintain and remediate road conditions also be taken into account.Data sourcesThe indicator relies on four major items of geospatial data: land cover (rural or urban), population distribution, road network extent and the “all-season” status of those roads.Land cover data (urban/rural distinction)Since the indicator measures the acess rural populations, it's necessary to define what is and what isn't rural. This dataset uses the DegUrba Methodology, proposed by the United Nations Expert Group on Statistical Methodology for Delineating Cities and Rural Areas (United Nations Expert Group, 2019). This approach has been developed by the European Commission Global Human Settlement Layer (GHSL-SMOD) project, and is designed to instil some consistency into the definitions based on population density on a 1-km grid, but adjusted for local situations.Population distributionThe source for population distribution data is WorldPop. This uses national census data, projections and other ancillary data from countries to produce aggregated, 100 m2 population data. Road extentTwo widely recognized road datasets are used: the real-time updated crowd-sourced OpenStreetMap (OSM) or the GLOBIO’s 2018 GRIP database, which draws data from official national sources. The reasons for picking the latter are mostly related to its ability to provide information on the surface (pavement) of these roads, to the detriment of the timeliness of the data, which is restrained to the year 2018. Additionally, data from Microsoft Bing's recent Road Detection project is used to ensure completeness. This dataset is completely derived from machine learning methods applied over satellite imagery, and detected 1,165 km of roads missing from OSM.Roads’ all-season statusThe World Bank's original 2006 methodology defines the term all-season as “… a road that is motorable all year round by the prevailing means of rural transport, allowing for occasional interruptions of short duration”. ReCAP's 2019 methodology makes a case for passability equating to the all-season status of a road, along with the assumption that typically the wet season is when roads become impassable, especially so in steep roads that are more exposed to landslides.This dataset follows the ReCAP methodology by creating an passability index. The proposed use of passability factors relies on the following three aspects:• Surface type. Many rural roads in LICs (and even in large high-income countries including the USA and Australia) are unpaved. As mentioned before, unpaved roads deteriorate rapidly and in a different way to paved roads. They are very susceptible to water ingress to the surface, which softens the materials and makes them very vulnerable to the action of traffic. So, when a road surface becomes saturated and is subject to traffic, the deterioration is accelerated. • Climate. Precipitation has a significant effect on the condition of a road, especially on unpaved roads, which predominate in LICs and provide much of the extended connectivity to rural and poor areas. As mentioned above, the rainfall on a road is a significant factor in its deterioration, but the extent depends on the type of rainfall in terms of duration and intensity, and how well the roadside drainage copes with this. While ReCAP suggested the use of general climate zones, we argue that better spatial and temporal resolutions can be acquired through the Copernicus Programme precipitation data, which is made available freely at ~30km pixel size for each month of the year.• Terrain. The gradient and altitude of roads also has an effect on their accessibility. Steep roads become impassable more easily due to the potential for scour during heavy rainfall, and also due to slipperiness as a result of the road surface materials used. Here this is drawn from slope calculated from SRTM Digital Terrain data.• Road maintenance. The ability of local authorities to remediate damaged caused by precipitation and landslides is proposed as a correcting factor to the previous ones. Ideally this would be measured by the % of GDP invested in road construction and maintenance, but this isn't available for all countries. For this reason, GDP per capita is adopted as a proxy instead. The data range is normalized in such a way that a road maxed out in terms of precipitation and slope (accessibility score of 0.25) in a country at the top of the GDP per capita range is brought back at to the higher end of the accessibility score (0.95), while the accessibility score of a road meeting the same passability conditions in a country which GDP per capita is towards the lower end is kept unchanged.Data processingThe roads from the three aforementioned datasets (Bing, GRIP and OSM) are merged together to them is applied a 2km buffer. The populations falling exclusively on unpaved road buffers are multiplied by the resulting passability index, which is defined as the normalized sum of the aforementioned components, ranging from 0.25 to. 0.9, with 0.95 meaning 95% probability that the road is all-season. The index applied to the population data, so, when calculated, the RAI includes the probability that the roads which people are using in each area will be all-season or not. For example, an unpaved road in a flat area with low rainfall would have an accessibility factor of 0.95, as this road is designed to be accessible all year round and the environmental effects on its impassability are minimal.The code for generating this dataset is available on Github at: https://github.com/sdsna/rai

About this dataset

Context

The dataset tabulates the data for the Black Mountain, NC population pyramid, which represents the Black Mountain population distribution across age and gender, using estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2019-2023 5-Year Estimates. It lists the male and female population for each age group, along with the total population for those age groups. Higher numbers at the bottom of the table suggest population growth, whereas higher numbers at the top indicate declining birth rates. Furthermore, the dataset can be utilized to understand the youth dependency ratio, old-age dependency ratio, total dependency ratio, and potential support ratio.

Key observations

• Youth dependency ratio, which is the number of children aged 0-14 per 100 persons aged 15-64, for Black Mountain, NC, is 22.1.
• Old-age dependency ratio, which is the number of persons aged 65 or over per 100 persons aged 15-64, for Black Mountain, NC, is 82.0.
• Total dependency ratio for Black Mountain, NC is 104.1.
• Potential support ratio, which is the number of youth (working age population) per elderly, for Black Mountain, NC is 1.2.

Content

When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2019-2023 5-Year Estimates.

Age groups:

• Under 5 years
• 5 to 9 years
• 10 to 14 years
• 15 to 19 years
• 20 to 24 years
• 25 to 29 years
• 30 to 34 years
• 35 to 39 years
• 40 to 44 years
• 45 to 49 years
• 50 to 54 years
• 55 to 59 years
• 60 to 64 years
• 65 to 69 years
• 70 to 74 years
• 75 to 79 years
• 80 to 84 years
• 85 years and over

Variables / Data Columns

• Age Group: This column displays the age group for the Black Mountain population analysis. Total expected values are 18 and are define above in the age groups section.
• Population (Male): The male population in the Black Mountain for the selected age group is shown in the following column.
• Population (Female): The female population in the Black Mountain for the selected age group is shown in the following column.
• Total Population: The total population of the Black Mountain for the selected age group is shown in the following column.

Good to know

Margin of Error

Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.

Custom data

If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.

Inspiration

Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.

Recommended for further research

This dataset is a part of the main dataset for Black Mountain Population by Age. You can refer the same here

This dataset contains CO2 emissions per 100 inhabitants from 2009 to 2020. If you want the total CO2 emissions in Valencia:CO2 emissions = (tons CO2 per 100hab.* Hab. totals in Valencia)/100NOTE: The population of Valencia changes annuallySource: Statistics Office of the City Council of Valencia

Overview

• Introduction
• Object Classes
  • Antlerless
  • Antlers
  • Buck
  • Coyote
  • Human
  • Raccoon

Introduction

This dataset aims to solve the task of identifying various wildlife and humans in forest environments for ecological studies and security monitoring. The dataset includes the following classes:

• Antlerless: Deer without antlers.
• Antlers: Antlers observed separately.
• Buck: Male deer with antlers.
• Coyote: Medium-sized wild dogs often seen in wooded areas.
• Human: People captured in the images.
• Raccoon: Nocturnal mammals, recognizable for their distinctive facial markings.

Object Classes

Antlerless

Description

Deer without visible antlers. Typically seen grazing or walking.

Instructions

• Annotate the entire body of the deer.
• Ensure the head, body, and legs are included.
• If the deer is at the edge of the image, cut the bounding box at the edge.
• Infer parts to include in the boungding box if they are not visible.

Antlers

Description

Antlers detached from the deer. These may be seen in fields or snagged in bushes.

Instructions

• Focus on the full structure of the antlers.
• Ensure no surrounding items like tree branches are included.
• Do not annotate if antlers are obscured or indistinguishable from the background.

Buck

Description

Male deer with prominent antlers. Look for the antlers to distinguish from antlerless deer.

Instructions

• Annotate the entire body including antlers.
• Make sure the antlers are distinctly visible and not confused with background branches.

Coyote

Description

Medium-sized canine with a pointed nose and bushy tail.

Instructions

• Annotate the entire coyote including head, torso, and tail.
• Ensure distinguishing features like the pointed nose and bushy tail are included.
• If the coyote is at the edge of the image, cut the bounding box at the edge.
• Infer parts to include in the boungding box if they are not visible.

Human

Description

Humans captured in various states of movement or stationary.

Instructions

• Enclose the entire body within the annotation.
• Include all parts, head, torso, legs, and arms.
• If the human is at the edge of the image, cut the bounding box at the edge.
• Infer parts to include in the boungding box if they are not visible.

Raccoon

Description

Small mammals distinguished by their facial "mask" and ringed tail.

Instructions

• Encompass the raccoon's entire body including its head and tail.
• Focus on the characteristic facial markings and ringed tail.
• Avoid annotations if the features are not clearly visible or are too obscured.

Suicide mortality among population aged 18-24 per 100 000 persons of same age Tables Suicide Mortality Among Population Aged 18 24 Per 100 000 Persons Of Same AgeTSV The indicator gives the number of suicides in the 18-24 age group during the year per 100 000 inhabitants of the same age by sex.Population proportions are calculated at THL based on the Population Statistics of Statistics Finland.

Abstract

The Bandafassi HDSS is located in south-eastern Senegal, near the borders with Mali and Guinea. The area is 700 km from the national capital, Dakar. The population under surveillance is rural and in 2012 comprised 13 378 inhabitants living in 42 villages. Established in 1970, originally for genetic studies, and initially covering only villages inhabited by one subgroup of the population of the area (the Mandinka), the project was transformed a few years later into a HDSS and then extended to the two other subgroups living in the area: Fula villages in 1975, and Bedik villages in 1980. Data gathered include births, marriages, migrations and deaths (including their causes). One specific feature of the Bandafassi HDSS is the availability of genealogies.

Villages are quite small - 270 inhabitants in average - divided in hamlet pour a part. The population density is 19 inhabitants per km².

The population is divided in three living ethnical groups in distinct villages. In 2000, the ethnical groups are : 1 - Bedik (25 % of population). 2 - Malinke (17 %), 3 - Peul (58 %).

The housing unit is the square (or concession) which hosts members of an extended patrilineal family. It contains 17 people in average.Peul and Bedik squares are less populated (15 and 18 people in average) than Malinke squares (27 people in average). Polygamy is intense (160 maried women for 100 maried men). Women maried to the same men usually inhabit in the same square. Each wife has her own hu, sharing the same square courtyard.

Analysis unit

Individual

Universe

At the census, a person was considered a member of the compound if the head of the compound declared it to be so. This definition was broad and resulted in a de jure population under study. Thereafter, a criterion was used to decide whether and when a person was to be excluded or included in the population.

A person was considered to exit from the study population through either death or emigration. Part of the population of Mlomp engages in seasonal migration, with seasonal migrants sometimes remaining 1 or 2 years outside the area before returning. A person who is absent for two successive yearly rounds, without returning in between, is regarded as having emigrated and no longer resident in the study population at the date of the second round. This definition results in the inclusion of some vital events that occur outside the study area. Some births, for example, occur to women classified in the study population but physically absent at the time of delivery, and these births are registered and included in the calculation of rates, although information on them is less accurate. Special exit criteria apply to babies born outside the study area: they are considered emigrants on the same date as their mother.

A new person enters the study population either through birth to a woman of the study population or through immigration. Information on immigrants is collected when the list of compounds of a village is checked ("Are there new compounds or new families who settled since the last visit?") or when the list of members of a compound is checked ("Are there new persons in the compound since the last visit?"). Some immigrants are villagers who left the area several years before and were excluded from the study population. Information is collected to determine in which compound they were previously registered, to match the new and old information.

Information is routinely collected on movements from one compound to another within the study area. Some categories of the population, such as older widows or orphans, frequently move for short periods of time and live in between several compounds, and they may be considered members of these compounds or of none. As a consequence, their movements are not always declared.

Kind of data

Event history data

Frequency of data collection

One round of data collection took place annual except in 1970 and 2015.

Sampling procedure

No samplaing is done

Sampling deviation

None

Mode of data collection

Proxy Respondent [proxy]

Research instrument

List of questionnaires: - Household book (used to register informations needed to define outmigrations) - Delivery questionnaire (used to register information of dispensaire ol mlomp) - New household questionnaire - New member questionnaire - Marriage and divorce questionnaire - Birth and marital histories questionnaire (for a new member) - Death questionnaire (used to register the date of death)

Cleaning operations

On data entry data consistency and plausibility were checked by 455 data validation rules at database level. If data validaton failure was due to a data collection error, the questionnaire was referred back to the field for revisit and correction. If the error was due to data inconsistencies that could not be directly traced to a data collection error, the record was referred to the data quality team under the supervision of the senior database scientist. This could request further field level investigation by a team of trackers or could correct the inconsistency directly at database level.

No imputations were done on the resulting micro data set, except for:

a. If an out-migration (OMG) event is followed by a homestead entry event (ENT) and the gap between OMG event and ENT event is greater than 180 days, the ENT event was changed to an in-migration event (IMG). b. If an out-migration (OMG) event is followed by a homestead entry event (ENT) and the gap between OMG event and ENT event is less than 180 days, the OMG event was changed to an homestead exit event (EXT) and the ENT event date changed to the day following the original OMG event. c. If a homestead exit event (EXT) is followed by an in-migration event (IMG) and the gap between the EXT event and the IMG event is greater than 180 days, the EXT event was changed to an out-migration event (OMG). d. If a homestead exit event (EXT) is followed by an in-migration event (IMG) and the gap between the EXT event and the IMG event is less than 180 days, the IMG event was changed to an homestead entry event (ENT) with a date equal to the day following the EXT event. e. If the last recorded event for an individual is homestead exit (EXT) and this event is more than 180 days prior to the end of the surveillance period, then the EXT event is changed to an out-migration event (OMG)

In the case of the village that was added (enumerated) in 2006, some individuals may have outmigrated from the original surveillance area and setlled in the the new village prior to the first enumeration. Where the records of such individuals have been linked, and indivdiual can legitmately have and outmigration event (OMG) forllowed by and enumeration event (ENU). In a few cases a homestead exit event (EXT) was followed by an enumeration event in these cases. In these instances the EXT events were changed to an out-migration event (OMG).

Response rate

On an average the response rate is about 99% over the years for each round.

Sampling error estimates

Not applicable

Data appraisal

CenterId Metric Table QMetric Illegal Legal Total Metric Rundate
SN011 MicroDataCleaned Starts 26293 2017-05-20 00:00
SN011 MicroDataCleaned Transitions 0 85058 85058 0 2017-05-20 00:00
SN011 MicroDataCleaned Ends 26293 2017-05-20 00:00
SN011 MicroDataCleaned SexValues 50 85008 85058 0 2017-05-20 00:00
SN011 MicroDataCleaned DoBValues 85058 2017-05-20 00:00

Stop relying on outdated and inaccurate databases and let Wiza be your source of truth for all deal sourcing and founder / CEO outreach.

Why we're different: The search fund market is dynamic and competitive - Wiza is not a static financial database that gets refreshed on occasion. Every datapoint is sourced and verified the moment that you receive the information. We verify deliverability of every single email ahead of providing the data, and we ensure that each person in your dataset has 100% job title and company accuracy by leveraging Linkedin Data sourced through their live Linkedin profile.

Key Features:

Comprehensive Data Coverage: Stop contacting the same people as everyone else. Wiza's search fund Data is sourced live, not stored in a limited database. When you tell us the type of company or person you would like to contact, we leverage Linkedin Data (the largest, most accurate database in the world) to find everyone who matches your ICP, and then we source the contact data and company data in real-time.

High-Quality, Accurate Data: Wiza ensures accuracy of all datapoints by taking a few key steps that other data providers fail to take: (1) Every email is SMTP verified ahead of delivery, ensuring they will not bounce (2) Every person's Linkedin profile is checked live to ensure we have 100% job title, company, location, etc. accuracy, ahead of providing any data (3) Phone numbers are constantly being verified with AI to ensure accuracy

Linkedin Data: Wiza is able to provide Linkedin Data points, sourced live from each person's Linkedin profile, including Subtitle, Bio, Job Title, Job Description, Skills, Languages, Certifications, Work History, Education, Open to Work, Premium Status, and more!

Personal Data: Wiza has access to industry leading volumes of B2C Contact Data, meaning you can find gmail/yahoo/hotmail email addresses, and mobile phone number data to contact your potential partners.

Abstract

The Ouagadougou Health and Demographic Surveillance System (Ouagadougou HDSS), located in five neighborhoods at the northern periphery of the capital of Burkina Faso, was established in 2008. Data on vital events (births, deaths, unions, migration events) are collected during household visits that have taken place every 10 months.

The areas were selected to contrast informal neighborhoods (40,000 residents) with formal areas (40,000 residents), with the aims of understanding the problems of the urban poor, and testing innovative programs that promote the well-being of this population. People living in informal areas tend to be marginalized in several ways: they are younger, poorer, less educated, farther from public services and more often migrants. Half of the residents live in the Sanitary District of Kossodo and the other half in the District of Sig-Nonghin.

The Ouaga HDSS has been used to study health inequalities, conduct a surveillance of typhoid fever, measure water quality in informal areas, study the link between fertility and school investments, test a non-governmental organization (NGO)-led program of poverty alleviation and test a community-led targeting of the poor eligible for benefits in the urban context. Key informants help maintain a good rapport with the community.

The areas researchers follow consist of 55 census tracks divided into 494 blocks. Researchers mapped all the census tracks and blocks using fieldworkers with handheld global positioning system (GPS) receivers and ArcGIS. During a first census (October 2008 to March 2009), the demographic surveillance system was explained to every head of household and a consent form was signed; during subsequent censuses, new households were enrolled in the same way.

Geographic coverage

Ouagadougou is the capital city of Burkina Faso and lies at the centre of this country, located in the middle of West Africa (128 North of the Equator and 18 West of the Prime Meridian).

Analysis unit

Individual

Universe

Resident household members of households resident within the demographic surveillance area. Inmigrants (visitors) are defined by intention to become resident, but actual residence episodes of less than six months (180 days) are censored. Outmigrants are defined by intention to become resident elsewhere, but actual periods of non-residence less than six months (180 days) are censored. Children born to resident women are considered resident by default, irrespective of actual place of birth. The dataset contains the events of all individuals ever residents during the study period (03 Oct. 2009 to 31 Dec. 2014).

Kind of data

Event history data

Frequency of data collection

This dataset contains rounds 0 to 7 of demographic surveillance data covering the period from 07 Oct. 2008 to 31 December 2014.

Sampling procedure

This dataset is not based on a sample, it contains information from the complete demographic surveillance area of Ouagadougou in Burkina Faso.

Reponse units (households) by Round: Round Households
2008 4941
2009 19159 2010 21168
2011 12548 2012 24174 2013 22326

Sampling deviation

None

Mode of data collection

Proxy Respondent [proxy]

Research instrument

List of questionnaires:

Collective Housing Unit (UCH) Survey Form - Used to register characteristics of the house - Use to register Sanitation installations - All registered house as at previous round are uploaded behind the PDA or tablet.

Household registration (HHR) or update (HHU) Form - Used to register characteristics of the HH - Used to update information about the composition of the household - All registered households as at previous rounds are uploaded behind the PDA or tablet.

Household Membership Registration (HMR) or update (HMU) - Used to link individuals to households. - Used to update information about the household memberships and member status observations - All member status observations as at previous rounds are uploaded behind the PDA or tablet.

Presences registration form (PDR) - Used to uniquely identify the presence of each individual in the household and to identify the new individual in the household - Mainly to ensure members with multiple household memberships are appropriately captured - All presences observations as at previous rounds are uploaded behind the PDA or tablet.

Visitor registration form (VDR) - Used register the characteristics of the new individual in the household - Used to capt the internal migration - Use matching form to facilitate pairing migration

Out Migration notification form (MGN) - Used to record change in the status of residency of individuals or households - Migrants are tracked and updated in the database

Pregnancy history form (PGH) & pregnancy outcome notification form (PON) - Records details of pregnancies and their outcomes - Only if woman is a new member - Only if woman has never completed WHL or WGH - All member pregnancy without pregnancy outcome as at previous rounds are uploaded behind the PDA or tablet.

Death notification form (DTN) - Records all deaths that have recently occurred - Includes information about time, place, circumstances and possible cause of death

Updated Basic information Form (UBIF) - Use to change the individual basic information

Health questionnaire (adults, women, child, elder) - Family planning - Chronic illnesses - Violence and accident - Mental health - Nutrition, alcohol, tobacco - Access to health services - Anthropometric measures - Physical limitations - Self-rated health - Food security

Variability of climate and water accessibility - accessibility to water - child health outcomes - gender outcomes - data on rainfall, temperatures, water quality

Cleaning operations

The data collection system is composed by two databases: - A temporary database, which contains data collected and transferred each day during the round. - A reference database, which contains all data of Ouagadougou Health and Demographic Surveillance System, in which is transferred the data of the temporary database to the end of each round. The temporary database is emptied at the end of the round for a new round.

The data processing takes place in two ways:

1) When collecting data with PDAs or tablets and theirs transfers by Wi-Fi, data consistency and plausibility are controlled by verification rules in the mobile application and in the database. In addition to these verifications, the data from the temporary database undergo validation. This validation is performed each week and produces a validation report for the data collection team. After the validation, if the error is due to an error in the data collection, the field worker equipped with his PDA or tablet go back to the field to revisit and correct this error. At the end of this correction, the field worker makes again the transfer of data through the wireless access points on the server. If the error is due to data inconsistencies that might not be directly related to an error in data collection, the case is remanded to the scientific team of the main database that could resolve the inconsistency directly in the database or could with supervisors perform a thorough investigation in order to correct the error.

2) At the end of the round, the data from the temporary database are automatically transferred into the reference database by a transfer program. After the success of this transfer, further validation is performed on the data in the database to ensure data consistency and plausibility. This still produces a validation report for the data collection team. And the same process of error correction is taken.

Response rate

Household response rates are as follows (assuming that if a household has not responded for 2 years following the last recorded visit to that household, that the household is lost to follow-up and no longer part of the response rate denominator):

Year Response Rate
2008 100%
2009 100%
2010 100%
2011 98% 2012 100% 2013 95%

Sampling error estimates

Not applicable

Data appraisal

CentreId MetricTable QMetric Illegal Legal Total Metric RunDate BF041 MicroDataCleaned Starts 151624 2017-05-16 13:36
BF041 MicroDataCleaned Transitions 0 314778 314778 0 2017-05-16 13:36
BF041 MicroDataCleaned Ends 151624 2017-05-16 13:36
BF041 MicroDataCleaned SexValues 314778 2017-05-16 13:36
BF041 MicroDataCleaned DoBValues 314778 2017-05-16 13:36

About this dataset

Context

The dataset tabulates the data for the Orange County, CA population pyramid, which represents the Orange County population distribution across age and gender, using estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2019-2023 5-Year Estimates. It lists the male and female population for each age group, along with the total population for those age groups. Higher numbers at the bottom of the table suggest population growth, whereas higher numbers at the top indicate declining birth rates. Furthermore, the dataset can be utilized to understand the youth dependency ratio, old-age dependency ratio, total dependency ratio, and potential support ratio.

Key observations

• Youth dependency ratio, which is the number of children aged 0-14 per 100 persons aged 15-64, for Orange County, CA, is 26.1.
• Old-age dependency ratio, which is the number of persons aged 65 or over per 100 persons aged 15-64, for Orange County, CA, is 23.6.
• Total dependency ratio for Orange County, CA is 49.7.
• Potential support ratio, which is the number of youth (working age population) per elderly, for Orange County, CA is 4.2.

Content

When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2019-2023 5-Year Estimates.

Age groups:

• Under 5 years
• 5 to 9 years
• 10 to 14 years
• 15 to 19 years
• 20 to 24 years
• 25 to 29 years
• 30 to 34 years
• 35 to 39 years
• 40 to 44 years
• 45 to 49 years
• 50 to 54 years
• 55 to 59 years
• 60 to 64 years
• 65 to 69 years
• 70 to 74 years
• 75 to 79 years
• 80 to 84 years
• 85 years and over

Variables / Data Columns

• Age Group: This column displays the age group for the Orange County population analysis. Total expected values are 18 and are define above in the age groups section.
• Population (Male): The male population in the Orange County for the selected age group is shown in the following column.
• Population (Female): The female population in the Orange County for the selected age group is shown in the following column.
• Total Population: The total population of the Orange County for the selected age group is shown in the following column.

Good to know

Margin of Error

Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.

Custom data

If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.

Inspiration

Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.

Recommended for further research

This dataset is a part of the main dataset for Orange County Population by Age. You can refer the same here

This table contains 2394 series, with data for years 1991 - 1991 (not all combinations necessarily have data for all years). This table contains data described by the following dimensions (Not all combinations are available): Geography (1 items: Canada ...), Population group (19 items: Entire cohort; Income adequacy quintile 1 (lowest);Income adequacy quintile 2;Income adequacy quintile 3 ...), Age (14 items: At 25 years; At 30 years; At 40 years; At 35 years ...), Sex (3 items: Both sexes; Females; Males ...), Characteristics (3 items: Life expectancy; High 95% confidence interval; life expectancy; Low 95% confidence interval; life expectancy ...).

Abstract (en): The Public Use Microdata Samples (PUMS) contain person- and household-level information from the "long-form" questionnaires distributed to a sample of the population enumerated in the 1980 Census. This data collection, containing 5-percent data, identifies every state, county groups, and most individual counties with 100,000 or more inhabitants (350 in all). In many cases, individual cities or groups of places with 100,000 or more inhabitants are also identified. Household-level variables include housing tenure, year structure was built, number and types of rooms in dwelling, plumbing facilities, heating equipment, taxes and mortgage costs, number of children, and household and family income. The person record contains demographic items such as sex, age, marital status, race, Spanish origin, income, occupation, transportation to work, and education. All persons and housing units in the United States and Puerto Rico. For this data collection, the full 1980 Census sample that received the "long-form" questionnaire (19.4 percent of all households) was sampled again through a stratified systematic selection procedure with probability proportional to a measure of size. This 5-percent sample, i.e., 5 households for every 100 households in the nation, includes over one-fourth of the households that received the long-form questionnaire. 2006-01-12 All files were removed from dataset 81 and flagged as study-level files, so that they will accompany all downloads.2006-01-12 All files were removed from dataset 80 and flagged as study-level files, so that they will accompany all downloads.2006-01-12 All files were removed from dataset 81 and flagged as study-level files, so that they will accompany all downloads.2006-01-12 All files were removed from dataset 80 and flagged as study-level files, so that they will accompany all downloads.1997-08-25 Part 72, Puerto Rico data, has been added to the collection, as well as supplemental documentation for Puerto Rico in the form of a separate PDF file. The household and person records in each hierarchical data file have logical record lengths of 193 characters, but the number of records varies with each file.The record layout for Part 72, Puerto Rico, is different from the state datasets. Refer to the supplemental documentation for this part.The codebook is available in hardcopy form only, while the Puerto Rico supplemental documentation is provided as a Portable Document Format (PDF) file.

Tutkimuksessa kartoitettiin pitkän iän salaisuuksia tarkastelemalla 90 vuotta täyttäneiden tamperelaisten asumiseen, avun saamiseen, toimintakykyyn ja arkeen liittyviä asioita. Kotona asuvilta tutkittavilta kysyttiin aluksi kenen kanssa he asuvat ja auttaako joku heitä kotona esimerkiksi pukeutumisessa, peseytymisessä ja ruoanlaitossa. Henkilökohtaista avunsaantia ja kodinhoitoapua selvitettiin tarkemmin kysymällä kuka auttaa eniten kotona jokapäiväisessä elämässä, käykö kodinhoitaja tai kotiavustaja ainakin kerran viikossa ja viettävätkö tutkittavat suurimman osan päivästä vuoteessa, jalkeilla vai istuskellen. Lisäksi kysyttiin, onko heidän mielestään ihmisen hyvä elää 100-vuotiaaksi. Kaikkien vastaajien fyysistä toimintakykyä selvitettiin kysymällä kykenevätkö tutkittavat liikkumaan vaikeuksitta, kävelemään 400 metriä, kulkemaan portaissa, pukeutumaan, pääsevätkö vuoteesta, onko tutkittavilla lääkärin toteamia sairauksia ja millaiseksi he arvioivat oman terveydentilansa. Tiedusteltiin myös, kuinka usein vastaajat ulkoilevat. Lisäksi kysyttiin, missä ammatissa tutkittavat ovat toimineet suurimman osan työikäänsä sekä koska viimeksi he ovat tavanneet lapsiaan tai puhuneet puhelimessa sukulaisten tai ystävän kanssa. Lopuksi vastaajia pyydettiin arvioimaan, minkä verran iäkkäitä ihmisiä arvostetaan nykyisin ja onko vanhojen ihmisten asema muuttunut tutkittavien lapsuuden ajoista. Edelleen kysyttiin vastaajien olinpaikkaa vastaushetkellä sekä vastasivatko vanhukset itse kysymyksiin. The survey studied longevity and the oldest-old by charting the care, everyday life, and physical activity and capability of people aged 90 and over living in Tampere. The respondents who lived at home were asked who they lived with, whether someone helped them at home, who helped them the most with everyday tasks, whether a housekeeper or home helper visited them regularly, whether they spent most of the day on their feet, sitting down or in bed, and whether they thought it is a good thing for a person to live to be 100 years old. The rest of the questions were asked from both those respondents who lived at home as well as the ones living in residential care. These questions surveyed when the respondents had last been out of the house/apartment/room, whether they used any mobility aids when moving about outside, how well the respondents were able to move and do everyday activities (e.g. walk 400 metres, use the stairs, dress and undress, and get in and out of bed), what their health status was like, and which illnesses diagnosed by a doctor they had. Finally, the respondents were asked when they had last met their children, when they had last talked on the phone with someone close to them as well as whether they thought old people were respected and whether the circumstances of old people were better or worse than before. There were two background variables, which charted where the respondent had been at the time of responding (e.g. ordinary home, old people's home, hospital) and who had responded or aided in responding to the survey; the respondent him/herself, a family member, relative or acquaintance, or a home helper. KokonaisaineistoTotalUniverseCompleteEnumeration Total universe/Complete enumerationTotalUniverseCompleteEnumeration Itsetäytettävä lomake: paperinen lomakeSelfAdministeredQuestionnaire.Paper

Statistics Population of Namur by neighbourhood – Evolution of the number of inhabitants and the gender ratio i.e. the number of women per 100 men. Figures collected on 1 January of each year since 1985.
This dataset is used on the Portal “Statistics of the 46 districts of Namur”, tab Demographic Observatory of the OPENDATA of the municipality of Namur.

Number of persons treated in closed and/or specialised outpatient care due to fall injuries per 100 000 inhabitants aged 65-79. Falling accident is defined by the external cause codes W00-W19, according to the classification ICD 10 - SE. Refers to the average for the time period year T-2 to year T. Data are available by gender breakdown.