Facebook
TwitterAviation statistics user engagement survey
Thank you very much for all responses to the survey and your interest in DfT Aviation Statistics. All feedback will be taken into consideration when we publish the Aviation Statistics update later this year, alongside which, we will update the background information with details of the feedback and any future development plans.
AVI0101 (TSGB0201): https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6753137f21057d0ed56a0415/avi0101.ods">Air traffic at UK airports: 1950 onwards (ODS, 9.93 KB)
AVI0102 (TSGB0202): https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6753138a14973821ce2a6d22/avi0102.ods">Air traffic by operation type and airport, UK (ODS, 37.6 KB)
AVI0103 (TSGB0203): https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/67531395dcabf976e5fb0073/avi0103.ods">Punctuality at selected UK airports (ODS, 41.1 KB)
AVI0105 (TSGB0205): https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/675313a014973821ce2a6d23/avi0105.ods">International passenger movements at UK airports by last or next country travelled to (ODS, 20.7 KB)
AVI0106 (TSGB0206): https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/67531f09e40c78cba1fb008d/avi0106.ods">Proportion of transfer passengers at selected UK airports (ODS, 9.52 KB)
AVI0107 (TSGB0207): https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/67531d7a14973821ce2a6d2d/avi0107.ods">Mode of transport to the airport (ODS, 14.3 KB)
AVI0108 (TSGB0208): https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/67531f17dcabf976e5fb007f/avi0108.ods">Purpose of travel at selected UK airports (ODS, 15.7 KB)
AVI0109 (TSGB0209): https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/67531f3b20bcf083762a6d3b/avi0109.ods">Map of UK airports (ODS, 193 KB)
AVI0201 (TSGB0210): https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/67531f527e5323915d6a042f/avi0201.ods">Main outputs for UK airlines by type of service (ODS, 17.7 KB)
AVI0203 (TSGB0211): https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/67531f6014973821ce2a6d31/avi0203.ods">Worldwide employment by UK airlines (ODS, <span class="
Facebook
TwitterOpen Government Licence 3.0http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/
License information was derived automatically
Daily data showing UK flight numbers and rolling seven-day average, including flights to, from, and within the UK. These are official statistics in development. Source: EUROCONTROL.
Facebook
TwitterThe number of flights performed globally by the airline industry has increased steadily since the early 2000s and reached **** million in 2019. However, due to the coronavirus pandemic, the number of flights dropped to **** million in 2020. The flight volume increased again in the following years and was forecasted to reach ** million in 2025.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
According to figures from the Aviation Safety Network, in the 1970s, there were about 6 fatal airliner accidents for every million commercial flights. This meant about 1 in every 165,000 flights ended in a fatal accident.
As the chart shows, this figure has dropped steadily in the last 50 years. According to the latest data, it is now about half a fatality per million flights. This means that, on average, it now takes more than 2 million flights for a fatal accident to occur.
The Community Emissions Data System (CEDS) produces invaluable long-term data on the emissions of air pollutants worldwide. It has just published its latest update, extending this data to 2022.
One of the most striking changes in air pollution trends has been the abrupt drop in sulfur dioxide (SO2) emissions from shipping. As you can see in the chart — where shipping is highlighted in red — there was a dramatic fall from over 10 million tonnes a year in 2019 to 3 million tonnes a year later.
The change resulted from the International Maritime Organization’s strict limits on marine fuels, introduced in 2020: the maximum percentage of sulfur allowed in these fuels fell from 3.5% to 0.5%. All ships worldwide had to comply.
This drop is positive for tackling local air pollution and acid rain. However, it also has implications for climate change since SO2 has masked some of the warming caused by greenhouse gases.
Facebook
TwitterPassengers enplaned and deplaned at Canadian airports, annual.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://mmo-population.com/termshttps://mmo-population.com/terms
Fly for Fun player activity dataset from MMO Populations, combining monthly enhanced players and 30-day daily estimates generated from public signals.
Facebook
TwitterFew human endeavors present as much of a planning and scheduling challenge as space flight, particularly manned space flight. Just on the operational side of it, efforts of thousands of people across hundreds of organizations need to be coordinated. Numerous tasks of varying complexity and nature, from scientific to construction, need to be accomplished within limited mission time frames. Resources need to be carefully managed and contingencies worked out, often on a very short notice. From the beginning of the NASA space program, planning has been done by large teams of domain experts working months, sometimes years, to put together a single mission. This approach, while proven very reliable up to now, is becoming increasingly harder to sustain. Elevated levels of NASA space activities, from deployment of the new Crew Exploration Vehicle (CEV) and completion of the International Space Station (ISS), to the planned lunar missions and permanent lunar bases, will put an even greater strain on this largely manual process. While several attempts to automate it have been made in the past, none have fully succeeded. In this paper we describe the current NASA planning methods, outline their advantages and disadvantages, discuss the planning challenges of upcoming missions and propose a distributed planning/scheduling framework (CMMD) aimed at unifying and optimizing the planning effort. CMMD will not attempt to make the process completely automated, but rather serve in a decision support capacity for human managers and planners. It will help manage information gathering, creation of partial and consolidated schedules, inter-team negotiations, contingencies investigation, and rapid re-planning when the situation demands it. The first area of CMMD application will be planning for Extravehicular Activities (EVA) and associated logistics. Other potential applications, not only in the space flight domain, and future research efforts will be discussed as well.
Facebook
TwitterFew human endeavors present as much of a planning and scheduling challenge as space flight, particularly manned space flight. Just on the operational side of it, efforts of thousands of people across hundreds of organizations need to be coordinated. Numerous tasks of varying complexity and nature, from scientific to construction, need to be accomplished within limited mission time frames. Resources need to be carefully managed and contingencies worked out, often on a very short notice. From the beginning of the NASA space program, planning has been done by large teams of domain experts working months, sometimes years, to put together a single mission. This approach, while proven very reliable up to now, is becoming increasingly harder to sustain. Elevated levels of NASA space activities, from deployment of the new Crew Exploration Vehicle (CEV) and completion of the International Space Station (ISS), to the planned lunar missions and permanent lunar bases, will put an even greater strain on this largely manual process. While several attempts to automate it have been made in the past, none have fully succeeded. In this paper we describe the current NASA planning methods, outline their advantages and disadvantages, discuss the planning challenges of upcoming missions and propose a distributed planning/scheduling framework (CMMD) aimed at unifying and optimizing the planning effort. CMMD will not attempt to make the process completely automated, but rather serve in a decision support capacity for human managers and planners. It will help manage information gathering, creation of partial and consolidated schedules, inter-team negotiations, contingencies investigation, and rapid re-planning when the situation demands it. The first area of CMMD application will be planning for Extravehicular Activities (EVA) and associated logistics. Other potential applications, not only in the space flight domain, and future research efforts will be discussed as well.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
India All Scheduled Airlines: Domestic: Number of Flight data was reported at 102,319.000 Unit in Mar 2025. This records an increase from the previous number of 92,291.000 Unit for Feb 2025. India All Scheduled Airlines: Domestic: Number of Flight data is updated monthly, averaging 48,100.000 Unit from Apr 2001 (Median) to Mar 2025, with 288 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 102,319.000 Unit in Mar 2025 and a record low of 188.000 Unit in Apr 2020. India All Scheduled Airlines: Domestic: Number of Flight data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Directorate General of Civil Aviation. The data is categorized under India Premium Database’s Transportation, Post and Telecom Sector – Table IN.TA019: Airline Statistics: All Scheduled Airlines.
Not seeing a result you expected?
Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.
Facebook
TwitterAviation statistics user engagement survey
Thank you very much for all responses to the survey and your interest in DfT Aviation Statistics. All feedback will be taken into consideration when we publish the Aviation Statistics update later this year, alongside which, we will update the background information with details of the feedback and any future development plans.
AVI0101 (TSGB0201): https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6753137f21057d0ed56a0415/avi0101.ods">Air traffic at UK airports: 1950 onwards (ODS, 9.93 KB)
AVI0102 (TSGB0202): https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6753138a14973821ce2a6d22/avi0102.ods">Air traffic by operation type and airport, UK (ODS, 37.6 KB)
AVI0103 (TSGB0203): https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/67531395dcabf976e5fb0073/avi0103.ods">Punctuality at selected UK airports (ODS, 41.1 KB)
AVI0105 (TSGB0205): https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/675313a014973821ce2a6d23/avi0105.ods">International passenger movements at UK airports by last or next country travelled to (ODS, 20.7 KB)
AVI0106 (TSGB0206): https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/67531f09e40c78cba1fb008d/avi0106.ods">Proportion of transfer passengers at selected UK airports (ODS, 9.52 KB)
AVI0107 (TSGB0207): https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/67531d7a14973821ce2a6d2d/avi0107.ods">Mode of transport to the airport (ODS, 14.3 KB)
AVI0108 (TSGB0208): https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/67531f17dcabf976e5fb007f/avi0108.ods">Purpose of travel at selected UK airports (ODS, 15.7 KB)
AVI0109 (TSGB0209): https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/67531f3b20bcf083762a6d3b/avi0109.ods">Map of UK airports (ODS, 193 KB)
AVI0201 (TSGB0210): https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/67531f527e5323915d6a042f/avi0201.ods">Main outputs for UK airlines by type of service (ODS, 17.7 KB)
AVI0203 (TSGB0211): https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/67531f6014973821ce2a6d31/avi0203.ods">Worldwide employment by UK airlines (ODS, <span class="