10 datasets found
  1. Covid19 Global Excess Deaths (daily updates)

    • kaggle.com
    zip
    Updated Dec 2, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Joakim Arvidsson (2025). Covid19 Global Excess Deaths (daily updates) [Dataset]. https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/joebeachcapital/covid19-global-excess-deaths-daily-updates
    Explore at:
    zip(2989004967 bytes)Available download formats
    Dataset updated
    Dec 2, 2025
    Authors
    Joakim Arvidsson
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Daily updates of Covid-19 Global Excess Deaths from the Economist's GitHub repository: https://github.com/TheEconomist/covid-19-the-economist-global-excess-deaths-model

    Interpreting estimates

    Estimating excess deaths for every country every day since the pandemic began is a complex and difficult task. Rather than being overly confident in a single number, limited data means that we can often only give a very very wide range of plausible values. Focusing on central estimates in such cases would be misleading: unless ranges are very narrow, the 95% range should be reported when possible. The ranges assume that the conditions for bootstrap confidence intervals are met. Please see our tracker page and methodology for more information.

    New variants

    The Omicron variant, first detected in southern Africa in November 2021, appears to have characteristics that are different to earlier versions of sars-cov-2. Where this variant is now dominant, this change makes estimates uncertain beyond the ranges indicated. Other new variants may do the same. As more data is incorporated from places where new variants are dominant, predictions improve.

    Non-reporting countries

    Turkmenistan and the Democratic People's Republic of Korea have not reported any covid-19 figures since the start of the pandemic. They also have not published all-cause mortality data. Exports of estimates for the Democratic People's Republic of Korea have been temporarily disabled as it now issues contradictory data: reporting a significant outbreak through its state media, but zero confirmed covid-19 cases/deaths to the WHO.

    Acknowledgements

    A special thanks to all our sources and to those who have made the data to create these estimates available. We list all our sources in our methodology. Within script 1, the source for each variable is also given as the data is loaded, with the exception of our sources for excess deaths data, which we detail in on our free-to-read excess deaths tracker as well as on GitHub. The gradient booster implementation used to fit the models is aGTBoost, detailed here.

    Calculating excess deaths for the entire world over multiple years is both complex and imprecise. We welcome any suggestions on how to improve the model, be it data, algorithm, or logic. If you have one, please open an issue.

    The Economist would also like to acknowledge the many people who have helped us refine the model so far, be it through discussions, facilitating data access, or offering coding assistance. A special thanks to Ariel Karlinsky, Philip Schellekens, Oliver Watson, Lukas Appelhans, Berent Å. S. Lunde, Gideon Wakefield, Johannes Hunger, Carol D'Souza, Yun Wei, Mehran Hosseini, Samantha Dolan, Mollie Van Gordon, Rahul Arora, Austin Teda Atmaja, Dirk Eddelbuettel and Tom Wenseleers.

    All coding and data collection to construct these models (and make them update dynamically) was done by Sondre Ulvund Solstad. Should you have any questions about them after reading the methodology, please open an issue or contact him at sondresolstad@economist.com.

    Suggested citation The Economist and Solstad, S. (corresponding author), 2021. The pandemic’s true death toll. [online] The Economist. Available at: https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/coronavirus-excess-deaths-estimates [Accessed ---]. First published in the article "Counting the dead", The Economist, issue 20, 2021.

  2. Rates of COVID-19 Cases or Deaths by Age Group and Vaccination Status and...

    • data.cdc.gov
    • healthdata.gov
    • +1more
    csv, xlsx, xml
    Updated Feb 22, 2023
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    CDC COVID-19 Response, Epidemiology Task Force (2023). Rates of COVID-19 Cases or Deaths by Age Group and Vaccination Status and Second Booster Dose [Dataset]. https://data.cdc.gov/Public-Health-Surveillance/Rates-of-COVID-19-Cases-or-Deaths-by-Age-Group-and/ukww-au2k
    Explore at:
    xlsx, xml, csvAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Feb 22, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Centers for Disease Control and Preventionhttp://www.cdc.gov/
    Authors
    CDC COVID-19 Response, Epidemiology Task Force
    Description

    Data for CDC’s COVID Data Tracker site on Rates of COVID-19 Cases and Deaths by Vaccination Status. Click 'More' for important dataset description and footnotes

    Dataset and data visualization details: These data were posted on October 21, 2022, archived on November 18, 2022, and revised on February 22, 2023. These data reflect cases among persons with a positive specimen collection date through September 24, 2022, and deaths among persons with a positive specimen collection date through September 3, 2022.

    Vaccination status: A person vaccinated with a primary series had SARS-CoV-2 RNA or antigen detected on a respiratory specimen collected ≥14 days after verifiably completing the primary series of an FDA-authorized or approved COVID-19 vaccine. An unvaccinated person had SARS-CoV-2 RNA or antigen detected on a respiratory specimen and has not been verified to have received COVID-19 vaccine. Excluded were partially vaccinated people who received at least one FDA-authorized vaccine dose but did not complete a primary series ≥14 days before collection of a specimen where SARS-CoV-2 RNA or antigen was detected. Additional or booster dose: A person vaccinated with a primary series and an additional or booster dose had SARS-CoV-2 RNA or antigen detected on a respiratory specimen collected ≥14 days after receipt of an additional or booster dose of any COVID-19 vaccine on or after August 13, 2021. For people ages 18 years and older, data are graphed starting the week including September 24, 2021, when a COVID-19 booster dose was first recommended by CDC for adults 65+ years old and people in certain populations and high risk occupational and institutional settings. For people ages 12-17 years, data are graphed starting the week of December 26, 2021, 2 weeks after the first recommendation for a booster dose for adolescents ages 16-17 years. For people ages 5-11 years, data are included starting the week of June 5, 2022, 2 weeks after the first recommendation for a booster dose for children aged 5-11 years. For people ages 50 years and older, data on second booster doses are graphed starting the week including March 29, 2022, when the recommendation was made for second boosters. Vertical lines represent dates when changes occurred in U.S. policy for COVID-19 vaccination (details provided above). Reporting is by primary series vaccine type rather than additional or booster dose vaccine type. The booster dose vaccine type may be different than the primary series vaccine type. ** Because data on the immune status of cases and associated deaths are unavailable, an additional dose in an immunocompromised person cannot be distinguished from a booster dose. This is a relevant consideration because vaccines can be less effective in this group. Deaths: A COVID-19–associated death occurred in a person with a documented COVID-19 diagnosis who died; health department staff reviewed to make a determination using vital records, public health investigation, or other data sources. Rates of COVID-19 deaths by vaccination status are reported based on when the patient was tested for COVID-19, not the date they died. Deaths usually occur up to 30 days after COVID-19 diagnosis. Participating jurisdictions: Currently, these 31 health departments that regularly link their case surveillance to immunization information system data are included in these incidence rate estimates: Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nebraska, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, New York City (New York), North Carolina, Philadelphia (Pennsylvania), Rhode Island, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Washington, and West Virginia; 30 jurisdictions also report deaths among vaccinated and unvaccinated people. These jurisdictions represent 72% of the total U.S. population and all ten of the Health and Human Services Regions. Data on cases among people who received additional or booster doses were reported from 31 jurisdictions; 30 jurisdictions also reported data on deaths among people who received one or more additional or booster dose; 28 jurisdictions reported cases among people who received two or more additional or booster doses; and 26 jurisdictions reported deaths among people who received two or more additional or booster doses. This list will be updated as more jurisdictions participate. Incidence rate estimates: Weekly age-specific incidence rates by vaccination status were calculated as the number of cases or deaths divided by the number of people vaccinated with a primary series, overall or with/without a booster dose (cumulative) or unvaccinated (obtained by subtracting the cumulative number of people vaccinated with a primary series and partially vaccinated people from the 2019 U.S. intercensal population estimates) and multiplied by 100,000. Overall incidence rates were age-standardized using the 2000 U.S. Census standard population. To estimate population counts for ages 6 months through 1 year, half of the single-year population counts for ages 0 through 1 year were used. All rates are plotted by positive specimen collection date to reflect when incident infections occurred. For the primary series analysis, age-standardized rates include ages 12 years and older from April 4, 2021 through December 4, 2021, ages 5 years and older from December 5, 2021 through July 30, 2022 and ages 6 months and older from July 31, 2022 onwards. For the booster dose analysis, age-standardized rates include ages 18 years and older from September 19, 2021 through December 25, 2021, ages 12 years and older from December 26, 2021, and ages 5 years and older from June 5, 2022 onwards. Small numbers could contribute to less precision when calculating death rates among some groups. Continuity correction: A continuity correction has been applied to the denominators by capping the percent population coverage at 95%. To do this, we assumed that at least 5% of each age group would always be unvaccinated in each jurisdiction. Adding this correction ensures that there is always a reasonable denominator for the unvaccinated population that would prevent incidence and death rates from growing unrealistically large due to potential overestimates of vaccination coverage. Incidence rate ratios (IRRs): IRRs for the past one month were calculated by dividing the average weekly incidence rates among unvaccinated people by that among people vaccinated with a primary series either overall or with a booster dose. Publications: Scobie HM, Johnson AG, Suthar AB, et al. Monitoring Incidence of COVID-19 Cases, Hospitalizations, and Deaths, by Vaccination Status — 13 U.S. Jurisdictions, April 4–July 17, 2021. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2021;70:1284–1290. Johnson AG, Amin AB, Ali AR, et al. COVID-19 Incidence and Death Rates Among Unvaccinated and Fully Vaccinated Adults with and Without Booster Doses During Periods of Delta and Omicron Variant Emergence — 25 U.S. Jurisdictions, April 4–December 25, 2021. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2022;71:132–138

  3. Data_Sheet_1_A global analysis of COVID-19 infection fatality rate and its...

    • frontiersin.figshare.com
    • datasetcatalog.nlm.nih.gov
    docx
    Updated Jun 2, 2023
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Nhi Thi Hong Nguyen; Tsong-Yih Ou; Le Duc Huy; Chung-Liang Shih; Yao-Mao Chang; Thanh-Phuc Phan; Chung-Chien Huang (2023). Data_Sheet_1_A global analysis of COVID-19 infection fatality rate and its associated factors during the Delta and Omicron variant periods: an ecological study.docx [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1145138.s001
    Explore at:
    docxAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 2, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Frontiers Mediahttp://www.frontiersin.org/
    Authors
    Nhi Thi Hong Nguyen; Tsong-Yih Ou; Le Duc Huy; Chung-Liang Shih; Yao-Mao Chang; Thanh-Phuc Phan; Chung-Chien Huang
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    BackgroundThe Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 is more highly infectious and transmissible than prior variants of concern. It was unclear which factors might have contributed to the alteration of COVID-19 cases and deaths during the Delta and Omicron variant periods. This study aimed to compare the COVID-19 average weekly infection fatality rate (AWIFR), investigate factors associated with COVID-19 AWIFR, and explore the factors linked to the increase in COVID-19 AWIFR between two periods of Delta and Omicron variants.Materials and methodsAn ecological study has been conducted among 110 countries over the first 12 weeks during two periods of Delta and Omicron variant dominance using open publicly available datasets. Our analysis included 102 countries in the Delta period and 107 countries in the Omicron period. Linear mixed-effects models and linear regression models were used to explore factors associated with the variation of AWIFR over Delta and Omicron periods.FindingsDuring the Delta period, the lower AWIFR was witnessed in countries with better government effectiveness index [β = −0.762, 95% CI (−1.238)–(−0.287)] and higher proportion of the people fully vaccinated [β = −0.385, 95% CI (−0.629)–(−0.141)]. In contrast, a higher burden of cardiovascular diseases was positively associated with AWIFR (β = 0.517, 95% CI 0.102–0.932). Over the Omicron period, while years lived with disability (YLD) caused by metabolism disorders (β = 0.843, 95% CI 0.486–1.2), the proportion of the population aged older than 65 years (β = 0.737, 95% CI 0.237–1.238) was positively associated with poorer AWIFR, and the high proportion of the population vaccinated with a booster dose [β = −0.321, 95% CI (−0.624)–(−0.018)] was linked with the better outcome. Over two periods of Delta and Omicron, the increase in government effectiveness index was associated with a decrease in AWIFR [β = −0.438, 95% CI (−0.750)–(−0.126)]; whereas, higher death rates caused by diabetes and kidney (β = 0.472, 95% CI 0.089–0.855) and percentage of population aged older than 65 years (β = 0.407, 95% CI 0.013–0.802) were associated with a significant increase in AWIFR.ConclusionThe COVID-19 infection fatality rates were strongly linked with the coverage of vaccination rate, effectiveness of government, and health burden related to chronic diseases. Therefore, proper policies for the improvement of vaccination coverage and support of vulnerable groups could substantially mitigate the burden of COVID-19.

  4. NSW COVID-19 cases by location

    • kaggle.com
    zip
    Updated Nov 9, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    liv heaton (2025). NSW COVID-19 cases by location [Dataset]. https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/livheaton/nsw-covid19-cases-by-location
    Explore at:
    zip(3416495 bytes)Available download formats
    Dataset updated
    Nov 9, 2025
    Authors
    liv heaton
    License

    https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

    Area covered
    New South Wales
    Description

    Context

    NSW has been hit by the Omicron variant, with skyrocketing cases. This dataset, updated regularly, details the location of positive cases. A prediction of where the most cases could occur can be derived from this dataset and a potential prediction of how many cases there is likely to be.

    Content

    notification_date: Text, dates to when the positive case was notified of a positive test result. postcode: Text, lists the postcode of the positive case. lhd_2010_code: Text, the code of the local health district of the positive case. lhd_2010_name: Text, the name of the local health district of the positive case. lga_code19: Text, the code of the local government area of the positive case. lga_name19: Text, the name of the local government area of the positive case.

    Acknowledgements

    Thanks to NSW Health for providing and updating the dataset.

    Inspiration

    The location of cases is highly important in NSW. In mid-2021, Western Sydney had the highest proportion of COVID-19 cases with many deaths ensuing. Western Sydney is one of Sydney's most diverse areas, with many vulnerable peoples. The virus spread to western NSW, imposing a risk to the Indigenous communities. With location data, a prediction service can be made to forecast the areas at risk of transmission.

  5. Covid Cases and Deaths WorldWide

    • kaggle.com
    zip
    Updated Feb 1, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Mrityunjay Pathak (2023). Covid Cases and Deaths WorldWide [Dataset]. https://www.kaggle.com/themrityunjaypathak/covid-cases-and-deaths-worldwide
    Explore at:
    zip(7919 bytes)Available download formats
    Dataset updated
    Feb 1, 2023
    Authors
    Mrityunjay Pathak
    License

    https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

    Description

    Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is an infectious disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

    Most people infected with the virus will experience mild to moderate respiratory illness and recover without requiring special treatment. However, some will become seriously ill and require medical attention. Older people and those with underlying medical conditions like cardiovascular disease, diabetes, chronic respiratory disease, or cancer are more likely to develop serious illness. Anyone can get sick with COVID-19 and become seriously ill or die at any age.

    The best way to prevent and slow down transmission is to be well informed about the disease and how the virus spreads. Protect yourself and others from infection by staying at least 1 metre apart from others, wearing a properly fitted mask, and washing your hands or using an alcohol-based rub frequently. Get vaccinated when it’s your turn and follow local guidance.

    The virus can spread from an infected person’s mouth or nose in small liquid particles when they cough, sneeze, speak, sing or breathe. These particles range from larger respiratory droplets to smaller aerosols. It is important to practice respiratory etiquette, for example by coughing into a flexed elbow, and to stay home and self-isolate until you recover if you feel unwell.

    Where are cases still high?

    Daily global cases fell after a spike in the spring but are now rising again, with the emergence of the BA.4 and BA.5 subvariants of the Omicron variant.

    Studies suggest that Omicron - which quickly became dominant in numerous countries - is milder than the Delta variant, but far more contagious. The subvariants are even more contagious.

  6. Table_2_Decrease in COVID-19 adverse outcomes in adults during the Delta and...

    • frontiersin.figshare.com
    docx
    Updated Jun 2, 2023
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Lenin Domínguez-Ramírez; Itzel Solis-Tejeda; Jorge Ayon-Aguilar; Antonio Mayoral-Ortiz; Francisca Sosa-Jurado; Rosana Pelayo; Gerardo Santos-López; Paulina Cortes-Hernandez (2023). Table_2_Decrease in COVID-19 adverse outcomes in adults during the Delta and Omicron SARS-CoV-2 waves, after vaccination in Mexico.docx [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1010256.s003
    Explore at:
    docxAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 2, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Frontiers Mediahttp://www.frontiersin.org/
    Authors
    Lenin Domínguez-Ramírez; Itzel Solis-Tejeda; Jorge Ayon-Aguilar; Antonio Mayoral-Ortiz; Francisca Sosa-Jurado; Rosana Pelayo; Gerardo Santos-López; Paulina Cortes-Hernandez
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Mexico, one of the countries severely affected by COVID-19, accumulated more than 5. 1 all-cause excess deaths/1,000 inhabitants and 2.5 COVID-19 confirmed deaths/1,000 inhabitants, in 2 years. In this scenario of high SARS-CoV-2 circulation, we analyzed the effectiveness of the country's vaccination strategy that used 7 different vaccines from around the world, and focused on vaccinating the oldest population first. We analyzed the national dataset published by Mexican health authorities, as a retrospective cohort, separating cases, hospitalizations, deaths and excess deaths by wave and age group. We explored if the vaccination strategy was effective to limit severe COVID-19 during the active outbreaks caused by Delta and Omicron variants. Vaccination of the eldest third of the population reduced COVID-19 hospitalizations, deaths and excess deaths by 46–55% in the third wave driven by Delta SARS-CoV-2. These adverse outcomes dropped 74–85% by the fourth wave driven by Omicron, when all adults had access to vaccines. Vaccine access for the pregnant resulted in 85–90% decrease in COVID-19 fatalities in pregnant individuals and 80% decrease in infants 0 years old by the Omicron wave. In contrast, in the rest of the pediatric population that did not access vaccination before the period analyzed, COVID-19 hospitalizations increased >40% during the Delta and Omicron waves. Our analysis suggests that the vaccination strategy in Mexico has been successful to limit population mortality and decrease severe COVID-19, but children in Mexico still need access to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines to limit severe COVID-19, in particular those 1–4 years old.

  7. Supplementary file 1_Burden of acute and long-term COVID-19: a nationwide...

    • frontiersin.figshare.com
    docx
    Updated Mar 18, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Mariam Murad; Stephen L. Atkin; Pearl Wasif; Alwaleed Abdulaziz Behzad; Aamal M. J. Abdulla Husain; Roisin Leahy; Florence Lefebvre d’Hellencourt; Jean Joury; Mohamed Abdel Aziz; Srinivas Rao Valluri; Hammam Haridy; Julia Spinardi; Moe H. Kyaw; Manaf Al-Qahtani (2025). Supplementary file 1_Burden of acute and long-term COVID-19: a nationwide study in Bahrain.docx [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1539453.s001
    Explore at:
    docxAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Mar 18, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Frontiers Mediahttp://www.frontiersin.org/
    Authors
    Mariam Murad; Stephen L. Atkin; Pearl Wasif; Alwaleed Abdulaziz Behzad; Aamal M. J. Abdulla Husain; Roisin Leahy; Florence Lefebvre d’Hellencourt; Jean Joury; Mohamed Abdel Aziz; Srinivas Rao Valluri; Hammam Haridy; Julia Spinardi; Moe H. Kyaw; Manaf Al-Qahtani
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Bahrain
    Description

    BackgroundCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) may lead to long-term sequelae. This study aimed to understand the acute and post-acute burden of SARS-CoV-2 infection and to identify high-risk groups for post-COVID-19 conditions (PCC).MethodsA retrospective observational study of the Bahraini population was conducted between 1 May 2021 and 30 April 2023, utilizing the national administrative database. PCC cases were defined according to WHO guidelines. All COVID-19 cases were confirmed using real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR).ResultsOf 13,067 COVID-19 cases, 12,022 of them experienced acute COVID-19, and 1,045 of them developed PCC. Individuals with PCC tended to be older women with risk factors and instances of SARS-CoV-2 reinfection. The incidence rates per 100,000 individuals during the Alpha pandemic surge (2020), Delta pandemic surge (2021), and Omicron pandemic surge (2022) were 2.2, 137.2, and 222.5 for acute COVID-19, and 0.27, 10.5, and 19.3, respectively, for PCC cases. The death rates per 100,000 individuals during the Alpha, Delta, and Omicron pandemic surges were 3, 112, and 76, respectively, for acute COVID-19 and 1, 10, and 8, respectively, for PCC. The death rate was highest among those aged 65 and older during the Delta pandemic surge.ConclusionThese findings suggest the need for a timely national vaccination program prior to new COVID-19 surges to prevent complications related to SARS-CoV-2 infection, particularly in the older adult and in non-older adult individuals with risk factors.

  8. f

    Data supporting the findings of the study.

    • plos.figshare.com
    • datasetcatalog.nlm.nih.gov
    txt
    Updated May 23, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Gizaw Teka; Adane Woldeab; Nebiyu Dereje; Frehywot Eshetu; Lehageru Gizachew; Zelalem Tazu; Leuel Lisanwork; Eyasu Tigabu; Ayele Gebeyehu; Adamu Tayachew; Mengistu Biru; Tsegaye Berkessa; Abrham Keraleme; Fentahun Bikale; Wolde Shure; Admikew Agune; Bizuwork Haile; Beza Addis; Muluken Moges; Melaku Gonta; Aster Hailemariam; Laura Binkley; Saira Nawaz; Shu-Hua Wang; Zelalem Mekuria; Ayalew Aklilu; Jemal Aliy; Sileshi Lulseged; Abiy Girmay; Abok Patrick; Berhanu Amare; Hulemenaw Delelegn; Sharon Daves; Getnet Yimer; Ebba Abate; Mesfin Wossen; Zenebe Melaku; Wondwossen Gebreyes; Desmond E. Williams; Aschalew Abayneh (2024). Data supporting the findings of the study. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0003175.s003
    Explore at:
    txtAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    May 23, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS Global Public Health
    Authors
    Gizaw Teka; Adane Woldeab; Nebiyu Dereje; Frehywot Eshetu; Lehageru Gizachew; Zelalem Tazu; Leuel Lisanwork; Eyasu Tigabu; Ayele Gebeyehu; Adamu Tayachew; Mengistu Biru; Tsegaye Berkessa; Abrham Keraleme; Fentahun Bikale; Wolde Shure; Admikew Agune; Bizuwork Haile; Beza Addis; Muluken Moges; Melaku Gonta; Aster Hailemariam; Laura Binkley; Saira Nawaz; Shu-Hua Wang; Zelalem Mekuria; Ayalew Aklilu; Jemal Aliy; Sileshi Lulseged; Abiy Girmay; Abok Patrick; Berhanu Amare; Hulemenaw Delelegn; Sharon Daves; Getnet Yimer; Ebba Abate; Mesfin Wossen; Zenebe Melaku; Wondwossen Gebreyes; Desmond E. Williams; Aschalew Abayneh
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic is one of the most devastating public health emergencies of international concern to have occurred in the past century. To ensure a safe, scalable, and sustainable response, it is imperative to understand the burden of disease, epidemiological trends, and responses to activities that have already been implemented. We aimed to analyze how COVID-19 tests, cases, and deaths varied by time and region in the general population and healthcare workers (HCWs) in Ethiopia.MethodsCOVID-19 data were captured between October 01, 2021, and September 30, 2022, in 64 systematically selected health facilities throughout Ethiopia. The number of health facilities included in the study was proportionally allocated to the regional states of Ethiopia. Data were captured by standardized tools and formats. Analysis of COVID-19 testing performed, cases detected, and deaths registered by region and time was carried out.ResultsWe analyzed 215,024 individuals’ data that were captured through COVID-19 surveillance in Ethiopia. Of the 215,024 total tests, 18,964 COVID-19 cases (8.8%, 95% CI: 8.7%– 9.0%) were identified and 534 (2.8%, 95% CI: 2.6%– 3.1%) were deceased. The positivity rate ranged from 1% in the Afar region to 15% in the Sidama region. Eight (1.2%, 95% CI: 0.4%– 2.0%) HCWs died out of 664 infected HCWs, of which 81.5% were from Addis Ababa. Three waves of outbreaks were detected during the analysis period, with the highest positivity rate of 35% during the Omicron period and the highest rate of ICU beds and mechanical ventilators (38%) occupied by COVID-19 patients during the Delta period.ConclusionsThe temporal and regional variations in COVID-19 cases and deaths in Ethiopia underscore the need for concerted efforts to address the disparities in the COVID-19 surveillance and response system. These lessons should be critically considered during the integration of the COVID-19 surveillance system into the routine surveillance system.

  9. Same as Table 1 for DTOT the total number of COVID-19 deaths per thousand...

    • plos.figshare.com
    bin
    Updated Jun 16, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Nathan Thenon; Marisa Peyre; Mireille Huc; Abdoulaye Touré; François Roger; Sylvain Mangiarotti (2023). Same as Table 1 for DTOT the total number of COVID-19 deaths per thousand inhabitants since the beginning of the pandemic. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010735.t002
    Explore at:
    binAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 16, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOShttp://plos.org/
    Authors
    Nathan Thenon; Marisa Peyre; Mireille Huc; Abdoulaye Touré; François Roger; Sylvain Mangiarotti
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Same as Table 1 for DTOT the total number of COVID-19 deaths per thousand inhabitants since the beginning of the pandemic.

  10. f

    Logistic regression for the outcome of having anti-N positive serology.

    • figshare.com
    • datasetcatalog.nlm.nih.gov
    • +1more
    xls
    Updated Aug 6, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Hannah Hussey; Helena Vreede; Mary-Ann Davies; Alexa Heekes; Emma Kalk; Diana Hardie; Gert van Zyl; Michelle Naidoo; Erna Morden; Jamy-Lee Bam; Nesbert Zinyakatira; Chad M. Centner; Jean Maritz; Jessica Opie; Zivanai Chapanduka; Hassan Mahomed; Mariette Smith; Annibale Cois; David Pienaar; Andrew D. Redd; Wolfgang Preiser; Robert Wilkinson; Andrew Boulle; Nei-yuan Hsiao (2024). Logistic regression for the outcome of having anti-N positive serology. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0003554.t001
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Aug 6, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS Global Public Health
    Authors
    Hannah Hussey; Helena Vreede; Mary-Ann Davies; Alexa Heekes; Emma Kalk; Diana Hardie; Gert van Zyl; Michelle Naidoo; Erna Morden; Jamy-Lee Bam; Nesbert Zinyakatira; Chad M. Centner; Jean Maritz; Jessica Opie; Zivanai Chapanduka; Hassan Mahomed; Mariette Smith; Annibale Cois; David Pienaar; Andrew D. Redd; Wolfgang Preiser; Robert Wilkinson; Andrew Boulle; Nei-yuan Hsiao
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Logistic regression for the outcome of having anti-N positive serology.

  11. Not seeing a result you expected?
    Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Joakim Arvidsson (2025). Covid19 Global Excess Deaths (daily updates) [Dataset]. https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/joebeachcapital/covid19-global-excess-deaths-daily-updates
Organization logo

Covid19 Global Excess Deaths (daily updates)

Daily updates of the Economist's Covid19 Global Excess Deaths data

Explore at:
zip(2989004967 bytes)Available download formats
Dataset updated
Dec 2, 2025
Authors
Joakim Arvidsson
License

Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically

Description

Daily updates of Covid-19 Global Excess Deaths from the Economist's GitHub repository: https://github.com/TheEconomist/covid-19-the-economist-global-excess-deaths-model

Interpreting estimates

Estimating excess deaths for every country every day since the pandemic began is a complex and difficult task. Rather than being overly confident in a single number, limited data means that we can often only give a very very wide range of plausible values. Focusing on central estimates in such cases would be misleading: unless ranges are very narrow, the 95% range should be reported when possible. The ranges assume that the conditions for bootstrap confidence intervals are met. Please see our tracker page and methodology for more information.

New variants

The Omicron variant, first detected in southern Africa in November 2021, appears to have characteristics that are different to earlier versions of sars-cov-2. Where this variant is now dominant, this change makes estimates uncertain beyond the ranges indicated. Other new variants may do the same. As more data is incorporated from places where new variants are dominant, predictions improve.

Non-reporting countries

Turkmenistan and the Democratic People's Republic of Korea have not reported any covid-19 figures since the start of the pandemic. They also have not published all-cause mortality data. Exports of estimates for the Democratic People's Republic of Korea have been temporarily disabled as it now issues contradictory data: reporting a significant outbreak through its state media, but zero confirmed covid-19 cases/deaths to the WHO.

Acknowledgements

A special thanks to all our sources and to those who have made the data to create these estimates available. We list all our sources in our methodology. Within script 1, the source for each variable is also given as the data is loaded, with the exception of our sources for excess deaths data, which we detail in on our free-to-read excess deaths tracker as well as on GitHub. The gradient booster implementation used to fit the models is aGTBoost, detailed here.

Calculating excess deaths for the entire world over multiple years is both complex and imprecise. We welcome any suggestions on how to improve the model, be it data, algorithm, or logic. If you have one, please open an issue.

The Economist would also like to acknowledge the many people who have helped us refine the model so far, be it through discussions, facilitating data access, or offering coding assistance. A special thanks to Ariel Karlinsky, Philip Schellekens, Oliver Watson, Lukas Appelhans, Berent Å. S. Lunde, Gideon Wakefield, Johannes Hunger, Carol D'Souza, Yun Wei, Mehran Hosseini, Samantha Dolan, Mollie Van Gordon, Rahul Arora, Austin Teda Atmaja, Dirk Eddelbuettel and Tom Wenseleers.

All coding and data collection to construct these models (and make them update dynamically) was done by Sondre Ulvund Solstad. Should you have any questions about them after reading the methodology, please open an issue or contact him at sondresolstad@economist.com.

Suggested citation The Economist and Solstad, S. (corresponding author), 2021. The pandemic’s true death toll. [online] The Economist. Available at: https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/coronavirus-excess-deaths-estimates [Accessed ---]. First published in the article "Counting the dead", The Economist, issue 20, 2021.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu