9 datasets found
  1. Number of U.S. pet owning households by species 2024

    • statista.com
    • itunite.ru
    • +1more
    Updated Jun 24, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2025). Number of U.S. pet owning households by species 2024 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/198095/pets-in-the-united-states-by-type-in-2008/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 24, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    An estimated ** million households in the United States owned at least one dog according to a 2024/25 pet owners survey, making them the most widely owned type of pet across the U.S. at this time. Cats and freshwater fish ranked in second and third places, with around ** million and ** million households owning such pets, respectively. Freshwater vs. salt water fish Freshwater fish spend most or all their lives in fresh water. Fresh water’s main difference to salt water is the level of salinity. Freshwater fish have a range of physiological adaptations to enable them to live in such conditions. As the statistic makes clear, Americans keep a large number of freshwater aquatic species at home as pets. American pet owners In 2023, around ** percent of all households in the United States owned a pet. This is a decrease from 2020, but still around a ** percent increase from 1988. It is no surprise that as more and more households own pets, pet industry expenditure has also witnessed steady growth. Expenditure reached over *** billion U.S. dollars in 2022, almost a sixfold increase from 1998. The majority of pet product sales are still made in brick-and-mortar stores, despite the rise and evolution of e-commerce in the United States.

  2. N

    NYC Dog Licensing Dataset

    • data.cityofnewyork.us
    • catalog.data.gov
    • +1more
    application/rdfxml +5
    Updated Feb 25, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Department of Mental Health and Hygeine (2025). NYC Dog Licensing Dataset [Dataset]. https://data.cityofnewyork.us/Health/NYC-Dog-Licensing-Dataset/nu7n-tubp
    Explore at:
    csv, json, tsv, application/rssxml, application/rdfxml, xmlAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Feb 25, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Department of Mental Health and Hygeine
    Area covered
    New York
    Description

    Active Dog Licenses.

    All dog owners residing in NYC are required by law to license their dogs. The data is sourced from the DOHMH Dog Licensing System (https://a816-healthpsi.nyc.gov/DogLicense), where owners can apply for and renew dog licenses. Each record represents a unique dog license that was active during the year, but not necessarily a unique record per dog, since a license that is renewed during the year results in a separate record of an active license period. Each record stands as a unique license period for the dog over the course of the yearlong time frame.

  3. NYC Dog Licenses

    • kaggle.com
    Updated Jan 12, 2019
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Smitha Achar (2019). NYC Dog Licenses [Dataset]. https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/smithaachar/nyc-dog-licensing-clean
    Explore at:
    CroissantCroissant is a format for machine-learning datasets. Learn more about this at mlcommons.org/croissant.
    Dataset updated
    Jan 12, 2019
    Dataset provided by
    Kaggle
    Authors
    Smitha Achar
    License

    http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/dbcl/1.0/http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/dbcl/1.0/

    Area covered
    New York
    Description

    Context

    I have taken this dataset from the NYC Open Data Website: https://data.cityofnewyork.us

    I wanted to use the cleaned version of this dataset and I thought people might like to use this version. The original dataset was last updated on 10th September 2018.

    Description: All dog owners residing in NYC are required by law to license their dogs. The data is sourced from the DOHMH Dog Licensing System (https://a816-healthpsi.nyc.gov/DogLicense), where owners can apply for and renew dog licenses. Each record represents a unique dog license that was active during the year, but not necessarily a unique record per dog, since a license that is renewed during the year results in a separate record of an active license period. Each record stands as a unique license period for the dog over the course of the yearlong time frame.

    Content

    The original dataset contained 122K rows and 15 columns. After cleaning the data, the count has reduced to 121862 rows.

    Acknowledgements

    Thank you to the city of new york for collecting and providing this data! As well as the NYC Department of Health who acquired this data from owners who registered their dogs for the dog license.

    Inspiration

    I'll let you guys get creative and explore the dataset.

  4. Cats & Dogs

    • kaggle.com
    Updated May 7, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Simon Weckert (2025). Cats & Dogs [Dataset]. https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/simonweckert/cats-and-dogs
    Explore at:
    CroissantCroissant is a format for machine-learning datasets. Learn more about this at mlcommons.org/croissant.
    Dataset updated
    May 7, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Kagglehttp://kaggle.com/
    Authors
    Simon Weckert
    License

    Apache License, v2.0https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    In this competition, you'll write an algorithm to classify whether images contain either a dog or a cat. This is easy for humans, dogs, and cats. Your computer will find it a bit more difficult.

    https://www.ethosvet.com/wp-content/uploads/cat-dog-625x375.png" alt="">

    The Asirra data set

    Web services are often protected with a challenge that's supposed to be easy for people to solve, but difficult for computers. Such a challenge is often called a CAPTCHA (Completely Automated Public Turing test to tell Computers and Humans Apart) or HIP (Human Interactive Proof). HIPs are used for many purposes, such as to reduce email and blog spam and prevent brute-force attacks on web site passwords.

    Asirra (Animal Species Image Recognition for Restricting Access) is a HIP that works by asking users to identify photographs of cats and dogs. This task is difficult for computers, but studies have shown that people can accomplish it quickly and accurately. Many even think it's fun! Here is an example of the Asirra interface:

    Asirra is unique because of its partnership with Petfinder.com, the world's largest site devoted to finding homes for homeless pets. They've provided Microsoft Research with over three million images of cats and dogs, manually classified by people at thousands of animal shelters across the United States. Kaggle is fortunate to offer a subset of this data for fun and research. Image recognition attacks

    While random guessing is the easiest form of attack, various forms of image recognition can allow an attacker to make guesses that are better than random. There is enormous diversity in the photo database (a wide variety of backgrounds, angles, poses, lighting, etc.), making accurate automatic classification difficult. In an informal poll conducted many years ago, computer vision experts posited that a classifier with better than 60% accuracy would be difficult without a major advance in the state of the art. For reference, a 60% classifier improves the guessing probability of a 12-image HIP from 1/4096 to 1/459. State of the art

    The current literature suggests machine classifiers can score above 80% accuracy on this task [1]. Therfore, Asirra is no longer considered safe from attack. We have created this contest to benchmark the latest computer vision and deep learning approaches to this problem. Can you crack the CAPTCHA? Can you improve the state of the art? Can you create lasting peace between cats and dogs?

    Submission Format

    Your submission should have a header. For each image in the test set, predict a label for its id (1 = dog, 0 = cat):

    id,label 1,0 2,0 3,0 etc...

  5. N

    DOHMH Dog Bite Data

    • data.cityofnewyork.us
    • nycopendata.socrata.com
    • +2more
    application/rdfxml +5
    Updated Feb 19, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (2025). DOHMH Dog Bite Data [Dataset]. https://data.cityofnewyork.us/Health/DOHMH-Dog-Bite-Data/rsgh-akpg
    Explore at:
    csv, application/rssxml, xml, application/rdfxml, json, tsvAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Feb 19, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Department of Health and Mental Hygiene
    Description

    NYC Reported Dog Bites.

    Section 11.03 of NYC Health Code requires all animals bites to be reported within 24 hours of the event.

    Information reported assists the Health Department to determine if the biting dog is healthy ten days after the person was bitten in order to avoid having the person bitten receive unnecessary rabies shots. Data is collected from reports received online, mail, fax or by phone to 311 or NYC DOHMH Animal Bite Unit. Each record represents a single dog bite incident. Information on breed, age, gender and Spayed or Neutered status have not been verified by DOHMH and is listed only as reported to DOHMH. A blank space in the dataset means no data was available.

  6. f

    Anonymized dataset.

    • plos.figshare.com
    xlsx
    Updated Nov 14, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Noriko Tamari; Kacey C. Ernst; Aaron J. Enriquez; Maria A. Diuk-Wasser; Maria P. Fernandez; Kevin Berry; Mary H. Hayden (2024). Anonymized dataset. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0311891.s002
    Explore at:
    xlsxAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Nov 14, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS ONE
    Authors
    Noriko Tamari; Kacey C. Ernst; Aaron J. Enriquez; Maria A. Diuk-Wasser; Maria P. Fernandez; Kevin Berry; Mary H. Hayden
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Over the past decade, Lyme and other tick-borne diseases have expanded into urban areas, including Staten Island, New York. While Lyme disease is often researched with a focus on human risk, domestic pets are also at risk of contracting the disease. The present study aims to describe differences in tick exposure, knowledge, attitude, and practices (KAP) between pet owners and non-owners, and to understand preventive strategies practiced by pet owners for themselves and their pets. We conducted KAP surveys via phone in 2020 and via face-to-face interviews in 2021, and we analyzed unique responses from 364 households on Staten Island. Pet owners were more likely to have ever found a tick on themselves or their household members (63%) than non-owners (46%) (p

  7. Z

    Supplementary dataset to publication: Dog ecology and rabies knowledge,...

    • data.niaid.nih.gov
    • zenodo.org
    Updated Oct 30, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Freuling, Conrad (2024). Supplementary dataset to publication: Dog ecology and rabies knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) in the Northern Communal Areas of Namibia [Dataset]. https://data.niaid.nih.gov/resources?id=zenodo_14006347
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Oct 30, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Freuling, Conrad
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Namibia
    Description

    In 2021, a comprehensive dog demographic questionnaire combined with a KAP survey were conducted in the northern communal areas (NCAs) of Namibia with the aim of gaining a better understanding of dog populations, owner behaviour, and knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) relating to rabies. The survey of 3,726 households across the eight regions of the NCAs provided insights that will inform interventions in order to improve human rabies prevention and Namibia’s dog rabies control strategy. The results showed a relatively low average human/dog ratio (HDR) of 5.4:1 indicating a surprisingly high dog population of at least 272,000 dogs in the NCAs, 93% of which appear to be owned but are free-roaming. Data analysis revealed opportunities but also highlighted needs for improvements in rabies surveillance and mass dog vaccinations. Although knowledge, attitude, and practice scores towards epidemiologic and clinical aspects, human rabies prevention, and dog rabies vaccination were deemed to be acceptable, the survey nevertheless revealed deficiencies in certain aspects in some of the population. Interestingly, data seemed to indicate relatively high dog bite incidences per 100,000 people, ranging between 262 and 1,369 and a certain number of unreported human rabies cases. Despite the very high number of dogs, only 50% of dog-owning households reported having vaccinated their dogs. In order to address these issues, the planning, announcement, and implementation of mass dog vaccination campaigns needs to be adapted to achieve adequate vaccination coverage. Another focus needs to be on rabies awareness and education if Namibia is to be significantly contributing to the global goal of “Zero by 30”.

  8. n

    Data from: An early dog from Southeast Alaska supports a coastal route for...

    • data.niaid.nih.gov
    • search.dataone.org
    • +3more
    zip
    Updated Jan 29, 2021
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Flavio Augusto da Silva Coelho; Stephanie Gill; Crystal Tomlin; Timothy Heaton; Charlotte Lindqvist (2021). An early dog from Southeast Alaska supports a coastal route for the first dog migration into the Americas [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.tb2rbp000
    Explore at:
    zipAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jan 29, 2021
    Dataset provided by
    University of South Dakota
    University at Buffalo, State University of New York
    Authors
    Flavio Augusto da Silva Coelho; Stephanie Gill; Crystal Tomlin; Timothy Heaton; Charlotte Lindqvist
    License

    https://spdx.org/licenses/CC0-1.0.htmlhttps://spdx.org/licenses/CC0-1.0.html

    Area covered
    Southeast Alaska, Americas, Alaska
    Description

    The oldest confirmed remains of domestic dogs in North America are from mid-continent archeological sites dated ~9,900 calibrated years before present (cal BP). Although this date suggests that dogs may not have arrived alongside the first Native Americans, the timing and routes for the entrance of New World dogs are unclear. Here, we present a complete mitochondrial genome of a dog from Southeast Alaska, dated to 10,150 ± 260 cal BP. We compared this high-coverage genome with data from modern dog breeds, historical Arctic dogs, and American precontact dogs (PCDs) from before European arrival. Our analyses demonstrate that the ancient dog shared a common ancestor with PCDs that lived ~14,500 years ago and diverged from Siberian dogs around 16,000 years ago, coinciding with the minimum suggested date for the opening of the North Pacific coastal (NPC) route along the Cordilleran Ice Sheet and genetic evidence for the initial peopling of the Americas. This ancient Southeast Alaskan dog occupies an early branching position within the PCD clade, indicating it represents a close relative of the earliest PCDs that were brought alongside people migrating from eastern Beringia southward along the NPC to the rest of the Americas. The stable isotope δ13C value of this early dog indicates a marine diet, different from the younger mid-continent PCDs’ terrestrial diet. Although PCDs were largely replaced by modern European dog breeds, our results indicate that their population decline started ~2,000 years BP, coinciding with the expansion of Inuit peoples, who are associated with traditional sled-dog culture. Our findings suggest that dogs formed part of the initial human habitation of the New World, and provide insights into their replacement by both Arctic and European lineages.

  9. f

    Summary of included articles.

    • figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Mar 19, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Sarah C. Leighton; Molly E. Hofer; Cara A. Miller; Matthias R. Mehl; Tammi D. Walker; Evan L. MacLean; Marguerite E. O’Haire (2025). Summary of included articles. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0313864.t002
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Mar 19, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS ONE
    Authors
    Sarah C. Leighton; Molly E. Hofer; Cara A. Miller; Matthias R. Mehl; Tammi D. Walker; Evan L. MacLean; Marguerite E. O’Haire
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Service dogs, trained to assist people with disabilities, are known to impact their human partners’ social experiences. While service dogs can act as a “social bridge,” facilitating greater social connection under certain circumstances, many service dog partners also encounter challenges in social settings because of the presence of their service dog – despite legal protections. Among the most common challenges reported are experiences of stigma, discrimination, and access or service denials. This preregistered integrative review sought to synthesize empirical, theoretical, and legal literature to understand better the social experiences reported by service dog partners in the United States, including (1) civil rights experiences; (2) experiences of stigma and discrimination; and (3) broader social experiences. Following database searches and article screening, a total of N = 43 articles met the eligibility criteria for inclusion. Analyses were conducted in two stages: first, synthesizing quantitative and qualitative findings to explore the magnitude of social experiences reported by empirical articles and second, narrative synthesis to integrate findings across all article types. Analyses identified three themes: Adverse Social Experiences, Contributing Factors, and Proposed Solutions. Overall, we found consistent reports of stigma, discrimination, and access denials for service dog handlers. Additionally, these adverse experiences may be more common for service dog partners with disabilities not externally visible (i.e., invisible disabilities such as diabetes or substantially limiting mental health conditions). This integrative review highlights a pattern of social marginalization and stigmatization for some service dog partners, exacerbated by inadequate legal protection and widespread service dog fraud. These findings have implications for the individual well-being of people with disabilities partnered with service dogs and highlight a need for collective efforts to increase inclusion and access. Effective solutions likely require a multi-component approach operating at various socio-ecological levels.

  10. Not seeing a result you expected?
    Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Statista (2025). Number of U.S. pet owning households by species 2024 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/198095/pets-in-the-united-states-by-type-in-2008/
Organization logo

Number of U.S. pet owning households by species 2024

Explore at:
17 scholarly articles cite this dataset (View in Google Scholar)
Dataset updated
Jun 24, 2025
Dataset authored and provided by
Statistahttp://statista.com/
Area covered
United States
Description

An estimated ** million households in the United States owned at least one dog according to a 2024/25 pet owners survey, making them the most widely owned type of pet across the U.S. at this time. Cats and freshwater fish ranked in second and third places, with around ** million and ** million households owning such pets, respectively. Freshwater vs. salt water fish Freshwater fish spend most or all their lives in fresh water. Fresh water’s main difference to salt water is the level of salinity. Freshwater fish have a range of physiological adaptations to enable them to live in such conditions. As the statistic makes clear, Americans keep a large number of freshwater aquatic species at home as pets. American pet owners In 2023, around ** percent of all households in the United States owned a pet. This is a decrease from 2020, but still around a ** percent increase from 1988. It is no surprise that as more and more households own pets, pet industry expenditure has also witnessed steady growth. Expenditure reached over *** billion U.S. dollars in 2022, almost a sixfold increase from 1998. The majority of pet product sales are still made in brick-and-mortar stores, despite the rise and evolution of e-commerce in the United States.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu