11 datasets found
  1. T

    World - Population, Female (% Of Total)

    • tradingeconomics.com
    csv, excel, json, xml
    Updated May 29, 2017
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    TRADING ECONOMICS (2017). World - Population, Female (% Of Total) [Dataset]. https://tradingeconomics.com/world/population-female-percent-of-total-wb-data.html
    Explore at:
    json, xml, csv, excelAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    May 29, 2017
    Dataset authored and provided by
    TRADING ECONOMICS
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Time period covered
    Jan 1, 1976 - Dec 31, 2025
    Area covered
    World, World
    Description

    Population, female (% of total population) in World was reported at 49.71 % in 2023, according to the World Bank collection of development indicators, compiled from officially recognized sources. World - Population, female (% of total) - actual values, historical data, forecasts and projections were sourced from the World Bank on July of 2025.

  2. Total population worldwide 1950-2100

    • statista.com
    • ai-chatbox.pro
    Updated Feb 24, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2025). Total population worldwide 1950-2100 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/805044/total-population-worldwide/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Feb 24, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Area covered
    World
    Description

    The world population surpassed eight billion people in 2022, having doubled from its figure less than 50 years previously. Looking forward, it is projected that the world population will reach nine billion in 2038, and 10 billion in 2060, but it will peak around 10.3 billion in the 2080s before it then goes into decline. Regional variations The global population has seen rapid growth since the early 1800s, due to advances in areas such as food production, healthcare, water safety, education, and infrastructure, however, these changes did not occur at a uniform time or pace across the world. Broadly speaking, the first regions to undergo their demographic transitions were Europe, North America, and Oceania, followed by Latin America and Asia (although Asia's development saw the greatest variation due to its size), while Africa was the last continent to undergo this transformation. Because of these differences, many so-called "advanced" countries are now experiencing population decline, particularly in Europe and East Asia, while the fastest population growth rates are found in Sub-Saharan Africa. In fact, the roughly two billion difference in population between now and the 2080s' peak will be found in Sub-Saharan Africa, which will rise from 1.2 billion to 3.2 billion in this time (although populations in other continents will also fluctuate). Changing projections The United Nations releases their World Population Prospects report every 1-2 years, and this is widely considered the foremost demographic dataset in the world. However, recent years have seen a notable decline in projections when the global population will peak, and at what number. Previous reports in the 2010s had suggested a peak of over 11 billion people, and that population growth would continue into the 2100s, however a sooner and shorter peak is now projected. Reasons for this include a more rapid population decline in East Asia and Europe, particularly China, as well as a prolongued development arc in Sub-Saharan Africa.

  3. Population of the world 10,000BCE-2100

    • statista.com
    Updated Aug 7, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2024). Population of the world 10,000BCE-2100 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1006502/global-population-ten-thousand-bc-to-2050/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Aug 7, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Area covered
    World
    Description

    Until the 1800s, population growth was incredibly slow on a global level. The global population was estimated to have been around 188 million people in the year 1CE, and did not reach one billion until around 1803. However, since the 1800s, a phenomenon known as the demographic transition has seen population growth skyrocket, reaching eight billion people in 2023, and this is expected to peak at over 10 billion in the 2080s.

  4. Probability of survival at various ages, by population group and sex, Canada...

    • www150.statcan.gc.ca
    • open.canada.ca
    Updated Dec 17, 2015
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Government of Canada, Statistics Canada (2015). Probability of survival at various ages, by population group and sex, Canada [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.25318/1310013501-eng
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Dec 17, 2015
    Dataset provided by
    Government of Canadahttp://www.gg.ca/
    Statistics Canadahttps://statcan.gc.ca/en
    Area covered
    Canada
    Description

    This table contains 2394 series, with data for years 1991 -1991 (not all combinations necessarily have data for all years). This table contains data described by the following dimensions (Not all combinations are available): Geography (1 items: Canada ...), Population group (19 items: Entire cohort; Income adequacy quintile 1 (lowest);Income adequacy quintile 3;Income adequacy quintile 2 ...), Age (14 items: At 25 years; At 30 years; At 35 years; At 40 years ...), Sex (3 items: Both sexes; Females; Males ...), Characteristics (3 items: Probability of survival; Low 95% confidence interval; life expectancy; High 95% confidence interval; life expectancy ...).

  5. d

    Exploring the Submerged New World on R/V Weatherbird II between 20110808 and...

    • catalog.data.gov
    Updated Oct 19, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (Point of Contact) (2024). Exploring the Submerged New World on R/V Weatherbird II between 20110808 and 20110818 [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/exploring-the-submerged-new-world-on-r-v-weatherbird-iibetween-20110808-and-201108182
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Oct 19, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    (Point of Contact)
    Description

    Underwater archaeologists, led by James Adovasio and Andy Hemmings of Mercyhurst College, dove at four sites that were first visited in 2009. At these locations, electronically documented intact river channel features of the Pleistocene Suwannee River are now filled with multiple layers of sediment. These sites are covered by 40 to 130 feet of ocean water and are located 50 to 125 miles offshore of the modern Gulf Coast of Florida northwest of Tampa or southeast of Tallahassee. The three shallower sites have bedrock exposed on the seafloor that forms one side of the buried channel. The bedrock at each of these sites is low grade knappable toolstone that could have been used for tool making. The deepest site, Thor’s Elbow, is the intersection of the ancient Suwannee and another river where they expected to find more knappable bedrock buried under the modern surface. At each of these sites divers hoped to locate prehistoric human made artifacts, bones of Pleistocene animals, such as the mastodon, and perhaps datable organic material such as pieces of wood. Any such finds would indicate that the now inundated Pleistocene landscape of Florida in the Gulf of Mexico is still preserved, accessible to archaeologists, and contains prehistoric evidence of the use of this landscape by people and animals alive at the end of the last Ice Age.

  6. Estimated pre-war Jewish populations and deaths 1930-1945, by country

    • statista.com
    Updated Sep 16, 2014
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2014). Estimated pre-war Jewish populations and deaths 1930-1945, by country [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1070564/jewish-populations-deaths-by-country/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Sep 16, 2014
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Area covered
    Russia, Poland, Germany
    Description

    The Holocaust was the systematic extermination of Europe's Jewish population in the Second World War, during which time, up to six million Jews were murdered as part of Nazi Germany's "Final Solution to the Jewish Question". In the context of the Second World War, the term "Holocaust" is traditionally used to reference the genocide of Europe's Jews, although this coincided with the Nazi regime's genocide and ethnic cleansing of an additional eleven million people deemed "undesirable" due to their ethnicity, beliefs, disability or sexuality (among others). During the Holocaust, Poland's Jewish population suffered the largest number of fatalities, with approximately three million deaths. Additionally, at least one million Jews were murdered in the Soviet Union, while Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, the Netherlands and Yugoslavia also lost the majority of their respective pre-war Jewish populations. The Holocaust in Poland In the interwar period, Europe's Jewish population was concentrated in the east, with roughly one third living in Poland; this can be traced back to the Middle Ages, when thousands of Jews flocked to Eastern Europe to escape persecution. At the outbreak of the Second World War, it is estimated that there were 3.4 million Jews living in Poland, which was approximately ten percent of the total population. Following the German invasion of Poland, Nazi authorities then segregated Jews in ghettos across most large towns and cities, and expanded their network of concentration camps throughout the country. In the ghettos, civilians were deprived of food, and hundreds of thousands died due to disease and starvation; while prison labor was implemented under extreme conditions in concentration camps to fuel the German war effort. In Poland, six extermination camps were also operational between December 1941 and January 1945, which saw the mass extermination of approximately 2.7 million people over the next three years (including many non-Poles, imported from other regions of Europe). While concentration camps housed prisoners of all backgrounds, extermination camps were purpose-built for the elimination of the Jewish race, and over 90% of their victims were Jewish. The majority of the victims in these extermination camps were executed by poison gas, although disease, starvation and overworking were also common causes of death. In addition to the camps and ghettos, SS death squads (Einsatzgruppen) and local collaborators also committed widespread atrocities across Eastern Europe. While the majority of these atrocities took place in the Balkan, Baltic and Soviet regions, they were still prevalent in Poland (particularly during the liquidation of the ghettos), and the Einsatzgruppen alone are estimated to have killed up to 1.3 million Jews throughout the Holocaust. By early 1945, Soviet forces had largely expelled the German armies from Poland and liberated the concentration and extermination camps; by this time, Poland had lost roughly ninety percent of its pre-war Jewish population, and suffered approximately three million further civilian and military deaths. By 1991, Poland's Jewish population was estimated to be just 15 thousand people, while there were fewer than two thousand Jews recorded as living in Poland in 2018.

  7. w

    Kagera Health and Development Survey 2010, Wave 6 - Tanzania

    • microdata.worldbank.org
    • catalog.ihsn.org
    • +1more
    Updated Jan 30, 2020
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Economic Development Initiatives (2020). Kagera Health and Development Survey 2010, Wave 6 - Tanzania [Dataset]. https://microdata.worldbank.org/index.php/catalog/2251
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jan 30, 2020
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Economic Development Initiatives
    Time period covered
    2010
    Area covered
    Tanzania
    Description

    Abstract

    The KHDS 2010 was designed to provide data to understand changes in living standards of the sample of individuals originally interviewed 16-19 years ago. The KHDS 2010 attempted to re-interview all respondents ever interviewed in the KHDS 91-94 – irrespective of whether the respondent had moved out of the original village, region, or country, or was residing in a new household.

    Geographic coverage

    Kagera region of Tanzania

    Analysis unit

    Households and individuals

    Universe

    The KHDS attempts to re-interview all respondents interviewed in the original KHDS 1991-1994, irrespective of whether the respondent had moved out of the original village, region or country or was residing in a new household.

    Kind of data

    Sample survey data [ssd]

    Sampling procedure

    KHDS 1991-1994 Household Sample: First Stage

    The KHDS 91-94 household sample was drawn in two stages, with stratification based on geography in the first stage and mortality risk in both stages. A more detailed overview of the sampling procedures is outlined in "User's Guide to the Kagera Health and Development Survey Datasets." (World Bank, 2004).

    In the first stage of selecting the sample, the 550 primary sampling units (PSUs) in Kagera region were classified according to eight strata defined over four agronomic zones and, within each zone, the level of adult mortality (high and low). A PSU is a geographical area delineated by the 1988 Tanzanian Census that usually corresponds to a community or, in the case of a town, to a neighbourhood. Enumeration areas of households were drawn randomly from the PSUs in each stratum, with a probability of selection proportional to the size of the PSU.

    Within each agronomic zone, PSUs were classified according to the level of adult mortality. The 1988 Tanzanian Census asked a 15 percent sample of households about recent adult deaths. Those answers were aggregated at the level of the "ward", which is an administrative area that is smaller than a district. The adult mortality rate (ages 15-50) was calculated for each ward and each PSU was assigned the mortality rate of its ward.

    Because the adult mortality rates were much higher in some zones than others and the distribution was quite different within zones, "high" and "low" mortality PSUs were defined relative to other PSUs within the same zone. A PSU was allocated to the "high" mortality category if its ward adult mortality rate was at the 90th percentile or higher of the ward adult mortality rates within a given agronomic zone.

    The KHDS 91-94 selected 51 communities as primary sampling units (also referred to as enumeration areas or clusters). In actuality, two pairs of enumeration areas were within the same community (in the sense of collecting community data on infrastructure, prices or schools). Thus, for community-level surveys, there are 49 areas to interview.

    KHDS 1991-1994 Household Sample: Second Stage

    The household selection at the second stage (with enumeration areas) was a stratified random sample, where households which were expected to experience an adult death were oversampled. In order to stratify the population, an enumeration of all households was undertaken.

    Between March 15 and June 13, 1991, 29,602 households were enumerated in the 51 areas. In addition to recording the name of the head of each household, the number of adults in the household (15 and older), and the number of children, the enumeration form asked:

    1. Are any adults in this household ill at this moment and unable to work? If so, the age of the sick adult and the number of weeks he/she has been too sick to work were also noted.
    2. Has any adult 15-50 in this household died in the past 12 months? If so, the age of each adult and the cause of death (illness, accident, childbirth, other) were also noted.

    The enumeration form asked explicitly about illness and death of adults between the ages of 15-50 because this is the age group disproportionately affected by the HIV/AIDS epidemic; it is the impact of these deaths that was of research interest. Out of over 29,000 households enumerated, only 3.7 percent, or 1,101, had experienced the death of an adult aged 15-50 caused by illness during the 12 months before the interview and only 3.9 percent, or 1,145, contained a prime-age adult too sick to work at the time of the interview. Only 77 households had both an adult death due to illness and a sick adult. This supports the point that, even with some stratification based on community mortality rates and in an area with very high adult mortality caused by an AIDS epidemic, a very large sample would have had to have been selected to ensure a sufficient number of households that would experience an adult death during the two-year survey.

    Using data from the enumeration survey, households were stratified according to the extent of adult illness and mortality. It was assumed that in communities suffering from an HIV epidemic, a history of prior adult death or illness in a household might predict future adult deaths in the same household. The households in each enumeration area were classified into two groups, based on their response to the enumeration:

    1. Sick" households: Those that had either an adult death (aged 15-50) due to illness in the past 12 months, an adult too sick to work at the time of the survey, or both (n=2,169).
    2. "Well" households: Those that had neither an adult death (aged 15-50) due to illness nor an adult (aged 15-50) too sick to work (n=27,433).

    In selecting the sixteen households to be interviewed in each enumeration area, fourteen were selected at random from the "sick" households in that enumeration area and two were selected at random from the "well" households. In one enumeration area, where the number of "sick" households available was less than fourteen, all available sick households were included in the sample; the numbers were balanced using well households. The final sample drawn for the first passage consisted of 816 households in 51 enumeration areas.

    KHDS 2004 and 2010 Household Samples

    The sampling strategy in KHDS 2004 and KHDS 2010 was to re-interview all individuals who were household members in any wave of the KHDS 91-94, a total of 6,353 people. The Household Questionnaire was administered in the household in which these PHHMs lived. If a household member was alive during the last interview in 1991-1994, but found to be deceased by the time of the fieldwork in 2004 and 2010 then the information about the deceased was collected in the Mortality Questionnaire. The next sections provide statistics of the KHDS 2004 and 2010 households.

    KHDS 2004 Households

    Although the KHDS is a panel of individuals and the concept of a household after 10-19 years is a vague notion, it is common in panel surveys to consider re-contact rates in terms of households. Table 4 shows the rate of re-contact of the baseline households in KHDS 2004, where a re-contact is defined as having interviewed at least one person from the household. In this case, the term household is defined by the baseline KHDS survey which spans a period of 2.5 years. Due to movements in and out of the household, some household members may have not, in fact, lived together in the household at the same time in the 1991-1994 waves (for example, consider one sibling of the household head moving into the household for one year and then moving out, followed by another sibling moving into the household).

    Excluding households in which all previous members are deceased (17 households and 27 respondents), the KHDS 2004 field team managed to re-contact 93 percent of the baseline households. Not all 915 households received four interviews. Unsurprisingly, households that were in the baseline survey for all four waves had the highest probability of being reinterviewed. Of these 746 households, 96 percent were re-interviewed.

    Turning to re-contact rates of the sample of 6,353 respondents, Table 5 shows the status of the respondents by age group (based on their age at first interview in the 1991-1994 waves). Reinterview rates are monotonically decreasing with age, although the reasons (deceased or not located) vary by age group. The older respondents were much more likely to be located if alive. Among the youngest respondents, over three-quarter were successfully re-interviewed. Excluding people who died, 82 percent of all respondents were re-interviewed.

    KHDS 2010 Households

    The re-contact rates in the KHDS 2010 are in line with the ones achieved in KHDS 2004. Table 4 of the Basic Information Document shows the KHDS 2010 re-contacting rates in terms of the baseline households. Excluding the households in which all PHHMs were deceased, 92 percent of the households were recontacted.

    As in KHDS 2004, households that were interviewed four times at the baseline were more likely to be found in 2010. Excluding the households in which all members had died, 95 percent of these households were re-interviewed in 2010.

    The KHDS 2010 re-contact rates in terms of panel respondents are provided in Table 5 of the Basic Information Document. As in 2004, the older respondents, if alive, were much more likely to be re-contacted than younger respondents. In the oldest age category, 60 years and older at the baseline, the interview teams managed to re-contact almost 98 percent of all survivors. The length of the KHDS survey starts to be seen in this age category however, as almost three quarters of the respondents had passed away by 2010.

    Table 6 of the Basic Information Document provides the KHDS 2010 re-contact rates by location. More than 50 percent of the reinterviewed panel respondents were located in the same community as in KHDS 91-94. Nearly 14 percent of the re-contacted respondents were found from

  8. h

    Malawi ART HTC Program Report 2008 Q4 - Dataset - The Document Management...

    • dms.hiv.health.gov.mw
    Updated Dec 15, 2008
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2008). Malawi ART HTC Program Report 2008 Q4 - Dataset - The Document Management System [Dataset]. https://dms.hiv.health.gov.mw/dataset/malawi-art-htc-program-report-2008-q4
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Dec 15, 2008
    Area covered
    Malawi
    Description

    By the end of December 2008, there were 221 health facilities in Malawi in the public and private health sector delivering ART to HIV-positive eligible patients. In the fourth quarter of 2008 (October to December) a total of 19,092 patients registered at ART sites in Malawi (39% male, 61% female; 91% adults and 9% children). Of those, 54% started in WHO stage 3, 11% in stage 4 and 33% based on a low CD4 count in Stage 1 or Stage 2. In the quarter a total of 30 infants started ART because of confirmed HIV infection (DNA-PCR) and 30 children under 18 months started because of presumed severe HIV disease. By the end of December 2008, there were 223,437 patients ever registered for ART (39% male, 61% female; 92% adult, 8% children) of which 27,843 had started on ART due to TB. The 223,437 patients who had ever registered on ART include 27,069 patients who transferred-out to other ART sites, and it is understood that these patients will be counted twice in the total patients ever registered. If we deduct the number of people transferred-out the number of people ever started on ART is 196,368. Cumulative outcomes of all patients ever registered by end of December 2008 were: 66% alive and on ART at the site of registration, 11% dead, 11% lost to follow-up, 12% transferred out to another facility and <1% stopped treatment. Of the 147,479 patients alive and on ART: 94% were on the first line regimen, 5% were on an alternative first line regimen, less than 1% were on second line regimen and 1% were on a nonstandard ART regimen. Non-standard regimens are not necessarily substandard regimens; they include patients continuing an ART regimen that was started outside Malawi, patients in research programmes and patients in specialist care in whom specific circumstances lead to the choice of a non-standard regimen. By the end of December 2008 there were 28 sites with 1,001-2,000 patients alive and on treatment; 10 sites with 2,001-5,000 and 5 with over 5,000 patients alive and on treatment.

  9. Population of the United States 1610-2020

    • statista.com
    Updated Aug 12, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2024). Population of the United States 1610-2020 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1067138/population-united-states-historical/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Aug 12, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    In the past four centuries, the population of the United States has grown from a recorded 350 people around the Jamestown colony of Virginia in 1610, to an estimated 331 million people in 2020. The pre-colonization populations of the indigenous peoples of the Americas have proven difficult for historians to estimate, as their numbers decreased rapidly following the introduction of European diseases (namely smallpox, plague and influenza). Native Americans were also omitted from most censuses conducted before the twentieth century, therefore the actual population of what we now know as the United States would have been much higher than the official census data from before 1800, but it is unclear by how much. Population growth in the colonies throughout the eighteenth century has primarily been attributed to migration from the British Isles and the Transatlantic slave trade; however it is also difficult to assert the ethnic-makeup of the population in these years as accurate migration records were not kept until after the 1820s, at which point the importation of slaves had also been illegalized. Nineteenth century In the year 1800, it is estimated that the population across the present-day United States was around six million people, with the population in the 16 admitted states numbering at 5.3 million. Migration to the United States began to happen on a large scale in the mid-nineteenth century, with the first major waves coming from Ireland, Britain and Germany. In some aspects, this wave of mass migration balanced out the demographic impacts of the American Civil War, which was the deadliest war in U.S. history with approximately 620 thousand fatalities between 1861 and 1865. The civil war also resulted in the emancipation of around four million slaves across the south; many of whose ancestors would take part in the Great Northern Migration in the early 1900s, which saw around six million black Americans migrate away from the south in one of the largest demographic shifts in U.S. history. By the end of the nineteenth century, improvements in transport technology and increasing economic opportunities saw migration to the United States increase further, particularly from southern and Eastern Europe, and in the first decade of the 1900s the number of migrants to the U.S. exceeded one million people in some years. Twentieth and twenty-first century The U.S. population has grown steadily throughout the past 120 years, reaching one hundred million in the 1910s, two hundred million in the 1960s, and three hundred million in 2007. In the past century, the U.S. established itself as a global superpower, with the world's largest economy (by nominal GDP) and most powerful military. Involvement in foreign wars has resulted in over 620,000 further U.S. fatalities since the Civil War, and migration fell drastically during the World Wars and Great Depression; however the population continuously grew in these years as the total fertility rate remained above two births per woman, and life expectancy increased (except during the Spanish Flu pandemic of 1918).

    Since the Second World War, Latin America has replaced Europe as the most common point of origin for migrants, with Hispanic populations growing rapidly across the south and border states. Because of this, the proportion of non-Hispanic whites, which has been the most dominant ethnicity in the U.S. since records began, has dropped more rapidly in recent decades. Ethnic minorities also have a much higher birth rate than non-Hispanic whites, further contributing to this decline, and the share of non-Hispanic whites is expected to fall below fifty percent of the U.S. population by the mid-2000s. In 2020, the United States has the third-largest population in the world (after China and India), and the population is expected to reach four hundred million in the 2050s.

  10. p

    Population and Housing Census 2011 - Nauru

    • microdata.pacificdata.org
    Updated Aug 18, 2013
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Population and Housing Census 2011 - Nauru [Dataset]. https://microdata.pacificdata.org/index.php/catalog/26
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Aug 18, 2013
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Nauru Bureau of Statistics
    Time period covered
    2011 - 2013
    Area covered
    Nauru
    Description

    Abstract

    The Nauru Population and Housing Census 2011 is funded by UNFPA and AusAID. Technical assistant was provided by the SPC/SDP from Noumea. The Census night took place on 30th October 2011 at 12 midnight. The fieldwork was scheduled to complete in 2 weeks and the final schedule was given 1-2 weeks extension time for supervisor's editing of forms.

    Geographic coverage

    • National
    • District
    • Enumeration area
    • Household members

    Analysis unit

    Region/EA Identity Household questionnaire Person questionnaire

    Universe

    The survey covered all de jure household members (usual residents), all household, all population, all age, all sex, all nationality

    Kind of data

    Census/enumeration data [cen]

    Sampling procedure

    Not applicable to a full enumeration census

    Sampling deviation

    Not applicable to a full enumeration census

    Mode of data collection

    Face-to-face [f2f]

    Cleaning operations

    Data editing took place at a number of stages throughout the processing, including: a) Office editing and coding b) During data entry c) Structure checking and completeness d) Secondary editing

    Response rate

    96%

    Sampling error estimates

    Not applicable to a full enumeration census

    Data appraisal

    Data quality tables are available to review the quality of the data and include the following:

    Table H1. District by Type of building Table H2. District by Materials of Outerwalls Table H3. District by Period building first constructed Table H4. District by type of tenure Table H5A. District by Number of household rooms Table H5B. District by Number of household dining rooms Table H5C. District by Number of household kitchen Table H5D. District by Number of household total rooms Table H6. District by Shared bathroom Table H7. District by Shared kitchen Table H8A. District by Materials of roofing Table H8B. District by Roofing condition Table H9A. District by Materials of guttering Table H9B. District by Condition of guttering Table H10A. District by Materials for downpipe Table H10B. District by Condition for downpipe Table H11. District by Downpipe connected to storage Table H12. District by Main source of drinking water Table H13. District by Main source of water in general Table H14. District by Water storage capacity Table H15. District by Material of water storage Table H16. District by water availability during 'dry' periods Table H17. District by household sharing main water supply Table H18. District by Source of water when scarce Table H19A. District by purpose of underground water usage Table H19B. District by Abstraction of underground water usage Table H20. District by Main toilet facility Table H21. District by Toilet flushed with water sources Table H22. District by Toilet flushed drainage system type Table H23A.District by items working order (For sustaining quality of life) Table H23B. District by items working order (ICT and communications) Table H23C. District by items working order (Commercial or subsistence value) Table H24. District by Main source of lighting Table H25. District by main fuel for cooking Table H26. District by main source of electricity Table H27. District by Household subsistence activities Table H28. District by household have a kitchen garden Table H29. District by Agricultural Activities Table H30. District by Livestock Table H31. District by Cash Inflow during last three months Table H32. District by any household member died last 3 years

    Table 1 . Total Households and Population by District Nauru:2011 Table 2. District by Broad Age Group and P2. Sex, Nauru:2011 Table 3. Population by single age by sex, Nauru:2011 Table 4. Population by District and 5 year age group and sex, NAURU:2011 Table 5. Population by District, Relationship to head of household by sex, NAURU:2011 Table 6 . Population by 5 year age group, and relationship to head of household by sex, NAURU:2011 Table 7. Population by District and Religion, Nauru:2011 Table 8. Population by religion, 5 year age group,Nauru:2011 Table 9. Population by district by country of birth, Nauru:2011 Table 10. Population by country of birth, 5 year age group and sex, Nauru:2011 Table 11. Population by district, whether mother still alive and living in the household, Nauru:2011 Table 12. Population by district and whether father is still alive, Nauru:2011 Table 13. Population by district, marital status and sex, Nauru:2011 Table 14. Population by 5 year age group, marital status and sex, Nauru:2011 Table 15. Population by district, mothers local tribe and sex, Nauru:2011 Table 16. Population by 5 year age group, mothers local tribe and sex, Nauru:2011 Table 17. Population by district, whether married to a Nauruan and sex, Nauru:2011 Table 18. Population by 5 year age group whether married to Nauruan and sex, Nauru:2011 Table 19. Population by district, nationality and sex, Nauru:2011 Table 20. Population by 5year age group, nationality and sex, Nauru:2011 Table 21. Population by district, citizenship and sex Table 22. Population by 5 year age group, citizenship and sex, Nauru:2011 Table 23. Population by district and difficulties, Nauru:2011 Table 24. Male population by district and difficulties, Nauru:2011 Table 25. Female population by district and difficulties, Nauru:2011 Table 26. Population by 5 year age group and difficulties, Nauru:2011 Table 27. Male Population by 5 year age group and difficulties, Nauru:2011 Table 28. Female Population by 5 year age group and difficulties, Nauru:2011 Table 29. Population by district, currently attending school and sex, Nauru:2011 Table 30. Popualtion 15 years and over, school attendace and sex, Nauru:2011 Table 31. Population 15 years and over by district , type of education institution attending, Nauru:2011 Table 32. Population 15 years and over by type of education institution attending and sex, Nauru:2011 Table 33. Population 15 years and over by highest qualification completed and sex, Nauru:2011 Table 34. Population 15 years and over by main activity and sex, Nauru:2011 Table 35. Population 15 years and over by labour force participation and sex, Nauru:2011 Table 36. Female population aged 15 years and over ever given birth, Nauru:2011 Table 37. Female population aged 15 years and over by total Children ever born Table 38. Female population aged 15 years and over by total male born, Nauru:2011 Table 39. Female population aged 15 years and over by total female born, Nauru:2011 Table 40. Female population aged 15 years and over and total children ever born, Nauru:2011 Table 41. Female population aged 15 years and over and total male ever born, Nauru:2011 Table 42. Female population aged 15 years and over and total female ever born, Nauru:2011

  11. Population of the UK 1871-2023

    • statista.com
    • ai-chatbox.pro
    Updated Oct 8, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2024). Population of the UK 1871-2023 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/281296/uk-population/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Oct 8, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Area covered
    United Kingdom
    Description

    In 2023, the population of the United Kingdom reached 68.3 million, compared with 67.6 million in 2022. The UK population has more than doubled since 1871 when just under 31.5 million lived in the UK and has grown by around 8.2 million since the start of the twenty-first century. For most of the twentieth century, the UK population steadily increased, with two noticeable drops in population occurring during World War One (1914-1918) and in World War Two (1939-1945). Demographic trends in postwar Britain After World War Two, Britain and many other countries in the Western world experienced a 'baby boom,' with a postwar peak of 1.02 million live births in 1947. Although the number of births fell between 1948 and 1955, they increased again between the mid-1950s and mid-1960s, with more than one million people born in 1964. Since 1964, however, the UK birth rate has fallen from 18.8 births per 1,000 people to a low of just 10.2 in 2020. As a result, the UK population has gotten significantly older, with the country's median age increasing from 37.9 years in 2001 to 40.7 years in 2022. What are the most populated areas of the UK? The vast majority of people in the UK live in England, which had a population of 57.7 million people in 2023. By comparison, Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland had populations of 5.44 million, 3.13 million, and 1.9 million, respectively. Within England, South East England had the largest population, at over 9.38 million, followed by the UK's vast capital city of London, at 8.8 million. London is far larger than any other UK city in terms of urban agglomeration, with just four other cities; Manchester, Birmingham, Leeds, and Glasgow, boasting populations that exceed one million people.

  12. Not seeing a result you expected?
    Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
TRADING ECONOMICS (2017). World - Population, Female (% Of Total) [Dataset]. https://tradingeconomics.com/world/population-female-percent-of-total-wb-data.html

World - Population, Female (% Of Total)

Explore at:
3 scholarly articles cite this dataset (View in Google Scholar)
json, xml, csv, excelAvailable download formats
Dataset updated
May 29, 2017
Dataset authored and provided by
TRADING ECONOMICS
License

Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically

Time period covered
Jan 1, 1976 - Dec 31, 2025
Area covered
World, World
Description

Population, female (% of total population) in World was reported at 49.71 % in 2023, according to the World Bank collection of development indicators, compiled from officially recognized sources. World - Population, female (% of total) - actual values, historical data, forecasts and projections were sourced from the World Bank on July of 2025.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu