A dataset containing basic conversations, mental health FAQ, classical therapy conversations, and general advice provided to people suffering from anxiety and depression.

This dataset can be used to train a model for a chatbot that can behave like a therapist in order to provide emotional support to people with anxiety & depression.

The dataset contains intents. An “intent” is the intention behind a user's message. For instance, If I were to say “I am sad” to the chatbot, the intent, in this case, would be “sad”. Depending upon the intent, there is a set of Patterns and Responses appropriate for the intent. Patterns are some examples of a user’s message which aligns with the intent while Responses are the replies that the chatbot provides in accordance with the intent. Various intents are defined and their patterns and responses are used as the model’s training data to identify a particular intent.

Mental Health in Tech Survey

Understanding Employee Mental Health Needs in the Tech Industry

By Stephen Myers [source]

About this dataset

This dataset contains survey responses from individuals in the tech industry about their mental health, including questions about treatment, workplace resources, and attitudes towards discussing mental health in the workplace. Mental health is an issue that affects all people of all ages, genders and walks of life. The prevalence of these issues within the tech industry–one that places hard demands on those who work in it–is no exception. By analyzing this dataset, we can better understand how prevalent mental health issues are among those who work in the tech sector.–and what kinds of resources they rely upon to find help–so that more can be done to create a healthier working environment for all.

This dataset tracks key measures such as age, gender and country to determine overall prevalence, along with responses surrounding employee access to care options; whether mental health or physical illness are being taken as seriously by employers; whether or not anonymity is protected with regards to seeking help; and how coworkers may perceive those struggling with mental illness issues such as depression or anxiety. With an ever-evolving landscape due to new technology advancing faster than ever before – these statistics have never been more important for us to analyze if we hope remain true promoters of a healthy world inside and outside our office walls

More Datasets

For more datasets, click here.

Featured Notebooks

• 🚨 Your notebook can be here! 🚨!

How to use the dataset

In this dataset you will find data on age, gender, country, and state of survey respondents in addition to numerous questions that assess an individual's mental state including: self-employment status, family history of mental illness, treatment status and access or lack thereof; how their mental health condition affects their work; number of employees at the company they work for; remote work status; tech company status; benefit information from employers such as mental health benefits and wellness program availability; anonymity protection if seeking treatment resources for substance abuse or mental health issues ; ease (or difficulty) for medical leave for a mental health condition ; whether discussing physical or medical matters with employers have negative consequences. You will also find comments from survey participants.

To use this dataset effectively: - Clean the data by removing invalid responses/duplicates/missing values - you can do this with basic Pandas commands like .dropna() , .drop_duplicates(), .replace(). - Utilize descriptive statistics such as mean and median to draw general conclusions about patterns of responses - you can do this with Pandas tools such as .groupby() and .describe(). - Run various types analyses such as mean comparisons on different kinds of variables(age vs gender), correlations between different features etc using appropriate statistical methods - use commands like Statsmodels' OLS models (.smf) , calculate z-scores , run hypothesis tests etc depending on what analysis is needed. Make sure you are aware any underlying assumptions your analysis requires beforehand !
- Visualize your results with plotting libraries like Matplotlib/Seaborn to easily interpret these findings! Use boxplots/histograms/heatmaps where appropriate depending on your question !

Research Ideas

• Using the results of this survey, you could develop targeted outreach campaigns directed at underrepresented groups that answer “No” to questions about their employers providing resources for mental health or discussing it as part of wellness programs.
• Analyzing the employee characteristics (e.g., age and gender) of those who reported negative consequences from discussing their mental health in the workplace could inform employer policies to support individuals with mental health conditions and reduce stigma and discrimination in the workplace.
• Correlating responses to questions about remote work, leave policies, and anonymity with whether or not individuals have sought treatment for a mental health condition may provide insight into which types of workplace resources are most beneficial for supporting employees dealing with these issues

Acknowledgements

If you use this dataset in your research, please credit the original authors. Data Source

License

License: Dataset copyright by authors - You are free to: - Share - copy and redi...

This release presents experimental statistics from the Mental Health Services Data Set (MHSDS), using final submissions for April 2016 and provisional submissions for May 2016. This is the fifth monthly release from the dataset, which replaces the Mental Health and Learning Disabilities Dataset (MHLDDS). As well as analysis of waiting times, first published in March 2016, this release includes elements of the reports that were previously included in monthly reports produced from final MHLDDS submissions. In this publication a new data file has been produced to present the data for people identified as having learning disabilities and/or autistic spectrum disorder (LDA) characteristics. Because of the scope of the changes to the dataset (resulting in the name change to MHSDS and the new name for these monthly reports) it will take time to re-introduce all possible measures that were previously part of the MHLDS Monthly Reports. Additional measures will be added to this report in the coming months. Further details about these changes and the consultation that informed were announced in November. From January 2016 the release includes information on people in children and young people's mental health services, including CAMHS, for the first time. Learning disabilities and autism services have been included since September 2014. This release of final data for April 2016 comprises: - An Executive Summary, which presents national-level analysis across the whole dataset and also for some specific service areas and age groups - Data tables about access and waiting times in mental health services for the based on provisional data for the period 1 March 2016 to 31 May 2016. - A monthly data file which presents 92 measures for mental health, learning disability and autism services at National, Provider and Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) level. - A Currency and Payments (CAP) data file, containing three measures relating to people assigned to Adult Mental Health Care Clusters. Further measures will be added in future releases. - A data file containing the measures relating to people with learning disabilities and/or autism. - Exploratory analysis of the coverage and completeness of access and waiting times statistics for people entering the Early Intervention in Psychosis pathway. - A set of provider level data quality measures for both months. The report comprises of validity measures for various data items at National and Provider level. From the publication of April data, a coverage report is included showing the number of providers submitting each month and number of records submitted. - A metadata file, which provide contextual information for each measure, including a full description, current uses, method used for analysis and some notes on usage. We will release the reports as experimental statistics until the characteristics of data flowed using the new data standard are understood. A correction has been made to this publication on 10 September 2018. This amendment relates to statistics in the monthly CSV data file; the specific measures effected are listed in the “Corrected Measures” CSV. All listed measures have now been corrected. NHS Digital apologises for any inconvenience caused.

Mental Health Chatbot Pairs

AI-based Tailored Support for Mental Health Conversation

By Huggingface Hub [source]

About this dataset

This dataset contains a compilation of carefully-crafted Q&A pairs which are designed to provide AI-based tailored support for mental health. These carefully chosen questions and answers offer an avenue for those looking for help to gain the assistance they need. With these pre-processed conversations, Artificial Intelligence (AI) solutions can be developed and deployed to better understand and respond appropriately to individual needs based on their input. This comprehensive dataset is crafted by experts in the mental health field, providing insightful content that will further research in this growing area. These data points will be invaluable for developing the next generation of personalized AI-based mental health chatbots capable of truly understanding what people need

More Datasets

For more datasets, click here.

Featured Notebooks

• 🚨 Your notebook can be here! 🚨!

How to use the dataset

This dataset contains pre-processed Q&A pairs for AI-based tailored support for mental health. As such, it represents an excellent starting point in building a conversational model which can handle conversations about mental health issues. Here are some tips on how to use this dataset to its fullest potential:

• Understand your data: Spend time getting to know the text of the conversation between the user and the chatbot and familiarize yourself with what type of questions and answers are included in this specific dataset. This will help you better formulate queries for your own conversational model or develop new ones you can add yourself.

• Refine your language processing models: By studying the patterns in syntax, grammar, tone, voice, etc., within this conversational data set you can hone your natural language processing capabilities - such as keyword extractions or entity extraction – prior to implementing them into a larger bot system .

• Test assumptions: Have an idea of what you think may work best with a particular audience or context? See if these assumptions pan out by applying different variations of text to this dataset to see if it works before rolling out changes across other channels or programs that utilize AI/chatbot services

• Research & Analyze Results : After testing out different scenarios on real-world users by using various forms of q&a within this chatbot pair data set , analyze & record any relevant results pertaining towards understanding user behavior better through further analysis after being exposed to tailored texted conversations about Mental Health topics both passively & actively . The more information you collect here , leads us closer towards creating effective AI powered conversations that bring our desired outcomes from our customer base .

Research Ideas

• Developing a chatbot for personalized mental health advice and guidance tailored to individuals' unique needs, experiences, and struggles.
• Creating an AI-driven diagnostic system that can interpret mental health conversations and provide targeted recommendations for interventions or treatments based on clinical expertise.
• Designing an AI-powered recommendation engine to suggest relevant content such as articles, videos, or podcasts based on users’ questions or topics of discussion during their conversation with the chatbot

Acknowledgements

If you use this dataset in your research, please credit the original authors. Data Source

License

License: CC0 1.0 Universal (CC0 1.0) - Public Domain Dedication No Copyright - You can copy, modify, distribute and perform the work, even for commercial purposes, all without asking permission. See Other Information.

Columns

File: train.csv | Column name | Description | |:--------------|:------------------------------------------------------------------------| | text | The text of the conversation between the user and the chatbot. (String) |

Acknowledgements

If you use this dataset in your research, please credit the original authors. If you use this dataset in your research, please credit Huggingface Hub.

This dataset contains responses from an online survey of 2187 participants primarily located in the UK. All participants stated that they had used the UK National Health Service (NHS) at some time in their lives. The data were collected between December 2018 and August 2019. Participants' views on data sharing - this dataset contains information about people's willingness to share mental and physical health data for research purposes. It also includes information on willingness to share other types of data, such as financial information. The dataset includes participants' responses to questions relating to mental health data sharing, including the trustworthiness of organisations which use such data, how much the presence of different governance measures (such as deidentification, opt-out, etc.) would alter their views, and whether they would be less likely to access NHS mental health services if they knew their data might be shared with researchers. Participants' satisfaction and interaction with UK mental and physical health services - the dataset includes information regarding participants' views on and interaction with NHS services. This includes ratings of satisfaction at first contact and in the previous 12 months, frequency of use, and type of treatment received. Information about participants - the dataset includes information about participants' mental and physical health, including whether or not they have experience with specific mental health conditions, and how they would rate their mental and physical health at the time of the survey. There is also basic demographic information about the participants (e.g. age, gender, location etc.).

Proportion of adults in contact with secondary mental health services living independently, with or without support.

This indicator provides the proportion of adults in contact with secondary mental health services that are in 'settled' accommodation and living independently. This indicator is calculated monthly by TEWv.

Improving employment and accommodations are linked to reduce risk of social exclusion, therefore the council gives support to people in need to live independently through:

- Social services - PREVENTION
- Social services - PACKAGES OF CARE

According to a March 2024 survey conducted in the United States, 32 percent of adults reported feeling that social media had neither a positive nor negative effect on their own mental health. Only seven percent of social media users said that online platforms had a very positive effect on their mental health, while 12 percent of users said it had a very negative impact. Furthermore, 22 percent of respondents said social media had a somewhat negative effect on their mental health. Is social media addictive? A 2023 survey of individuals between 11 and 59 years old in the United States found that over 73 percent of TikTok users agreed that the platform was addictive. Furthermore, nearly 27 percent of those surveyed reported experiencing negative psychological effects related to TikTok use. Users belonging to Generation Z were the most likely to say that TikTok is addictive, yet millennials felt the negative effects of using the app more so than Gen Z. In the U.S., it is also not uncommon for social media users to take breaks from using online platforms, and as of March 2024, over a third of adults in the country had done so. Following mental health-related content Although online users may be aware of the negative and addictive aspects of social media, it is also a useful tool for finding supportive content. In a global survey conducted in 2023, 32 percent of social media users followed therapists and mental health professionals on social media. Overall, 24 percent of respondents said that they followed people on social media if they had the same condition as they did. Between January 2020 and March 2023, British actress and model Cara Delevingne was the celebrity mental health activist with the highest growth in searches tying her name to the topic.

The Mental Health and Learning Disabilities Data Set version 1 (Event Level - sensitive data exclusion). The Mental Health Minimum Data Set was superseded by the Mental Health and Learning Disabilities Data Set, which in turn was superseded by the Mental Health Services Data Set. The Mental Health and Learning Disabilities Data Set collected data from the health records of individual children, young people and adults who were in contact with mental health services.

Context

This dataset explores the relationship between digital behavior and mental well-being among 100,000 individuals. It records how much time people spend on screens, use of social media (including TikTok), and how these habits may influence their sleep, stress, and mood levels.

It includes six numerical features, all clean and ready for analysis, making it ideal for machine learning tasks like regression or classification. The data enables researchers and analysts to investigate how modern digital lifestyles may impact mental health indicators in measurable ways.

Dataset Applications

• Quantify how screen‑time, TikTok use, or multi‑platform engagement statistically relate to stress, sleep loss, and mood.
• Train regression or classification models that forecast stress level or mood score from real‑time digital‑usage metrics.
• Feed user‑specific data into recommender systems that suggest screen‑time caps or bedtime routines to improve mental health.
• Provide evidence for guidelines on youth screen‑time limits and platform moderation based on observed stress‑sleep trade‑offs.
• Serve as a teaching dataset for EDA, feature engineering, and model evaluation in data‑science or psychology curricula.
• Evaluate app interventions (e.g., screen‑time nudges) by comparing predicted versus actual post‑intervention stress or mood shifts.
• Cluster individuals into digital‑behavior personas (e.g., “heavy late‑night scrollers”) to tailor mental‑health resources.
• Generate synthetic time‑series scenarios (what‑if reductions in TikTok hours) to estimate downstream impacts on sleep and stress.
• Use engineered features (ratio of TikTok hours to total screen‑time, etc.) in broader wellbeing models that include diet or exercise data.
• Assess whether mental‑health prediction models remain accurate and unbiased across different screen‑time or platform‑use segments. # Column Descriptions
• screen_time_hours – Daily total screen usage in hours across all devices.
• social_media_platforms_used – Number of different social media platforms used per day.
• hours_on_TikTok – Time spent on TikTok daily, in hours.
• sleep_hours – Average number of sleep hours per night.
• stress_level – Stress intensity reported on a scale from 1 (low) to 10 (high).
• mood_score – Self-rated mood on a scale from 2 (poor) to 10 (excell # Inspiration This dataset was inspired by growing concerns about how screen time and social media affect mental health. It enables analysis of the links between digital habits, stress, sleep, and mood—encouraging data-driven solutions for healthier online behavior and emotional well-being. # Ethically Mined Data: This dataset has been ethically mined and synthetically generated without collecting any personally identifiable information. All values are artificial but statistically realistic, allowing safe use in academic, research, and public health projects while fully respecting user privacy and data ethics.

The Currencies data collected from the Mental Health Services Data Set.The Mental Health Services Data Set (MHSDS) collects data from the health records of individual children, young people and adults who are in contact with mental health services. The data is re-used for purposes other than their direct care and as such is referred to as a secondary uses data set. It defines data items, definitions and information extracted or derived from local information systems.

Dataset Card for "heliosbrahma/mental_health_chatbot_dataset"

  Dataset Description





  Dataset Summary

This dataset contains conversational pair of questions and answers in a single text related to Mental Health. Dataset was curated from popular healthcare blogs like WebMD, Mayo Clinic and HeatlhLine, online FAQs etc. All questions and answers have been anonymized to remove any PII data and pre-processed to remove any unwanted characters.

  Languages

The… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/heliosbrahma/mental_health_chatbot_dataset.

This article investigates: What groups were most affected by COVID-19? How did mental health diagnosis and substance use disorder patterns change? Most importantly, what can these data show us about what was done immediately after COVID-19 to alleviate mental health and substance use diagnoses and how might we better address future public health challenges? This analysis utilized data from multiple national surveys to examine trends in mental health and substance use and the availability of treatment facilities. The analysis focused on both before and after the COVID-19 pandemic specifically in 2018 and 2022. The primary data sources were the General Social Survey (GSS), the Mental Health Client-Level Data (MH-CLD) data set, and the National Substance Use and Mental Health Services Survey (N-SUMHSS). This analysis reveals significant shifts in both mental health and substance use trends following the COVID-19 pandemic.

Analysis of ‘Anxiety and Depression Psychological Therapies ’ provided by Analyst-2 (analyst-2.ai), based on source dataset retrieved from https://www.kaggle.com/mpwolke/cusersmarildownloadsanxietycsv on 28 January 2022.

--- Dataset description provided by original source is as follows ---

Context

National Clinical Audit of Anxiety and Depression Psychological Therapies Spotlight Audit. Data collected between October 2018 and January 2019 and aggregated by mental health services delivering psychological therapies in secondary care.

https://data.gov.uk/dataset/3da96fcf-7abb-4118-93d0-928b77e3ab75/national-clinical-audit-of-anxiety-and-depression-psychological-therapies-spotlight-audit

Content

Freedom of Information (FOI) requests : Dr Alan Quirk Alan.Quirk@rcpsych.ac.uk https://www.rcpsych.ac.uk/improving-care/ccqi/national-clinical-audits/national-clinical-audit-of-anxiety-and-depression

Acknowledgements

https://data.gov.uk/dataset/3da96fcf-7abb-4118-93d0-928b77e3ab75/national-clinical-audit-of-anxiety-and-depression-psychological-therapies-spotlight-audit

Photo by Sarah Kilian on Unsplash (Covid-19 times)

Inspiration

The Implications of COVID-19 for Mental Health . The COVID-19 pandemic and resulting economic downturn have negatively affected many people’s mental health and created new barriers for people already suffering from mental illness and substance use disorders. Therefore this Pandemic affects not only the infected persons but all the World, with repercussions that can persists beyond 2020.

--- Original source retains full ownership of the source dataset ---

Analysis of ‘Unemployment and mental illness survey’ provided by Analyst-2 (analyst-2.ai), based on source dataset retrieved from https://www.kaggle.com/michaelacorley/unemployment-and-mental-illness-survey on 28 January 2022.

--- Dataset description provided by original source is as follows ---

Context

This is a paid research survey to explore the linkage between mental illness and unemployment. NAMI has conducted multiple surveys verifying the high unemployment rate among those with mental illness, but this is the only survey to date which targets causation (why they are unemployed). Statistical significance of the variance has long since been proven by previous, larger samples.

You are free to visualize and publish results, please just credit me by name.

Collection methodology

I received several messages about methodology of collection because various people would like to use this data for papers.

• I paid respondents on Survey Monkey in a general population sampling. I did not target any specific demographic as not to get skewed results. Survey Monkey stratifies the sample according to certain characteristics like income and location.

• I know that the general population sampling went well because the number of people self identifying as having a mental illness is consistent with larger samples.

• Although we disqualified people without a mental illness, they were still given the complete survey. That means that the data contains sampling of people with and without mental illness and a yes/no indicator.

Potential area's to investigate

• Linkage between unemployment and education level
• The effect of a gap on your resume on income level
• Symptom/side effects impact on employment
• The effectiveness of social welfare programs
• The linkage between gaps in your resume and hospitalizations due to mental illness

Content

***Sample size:** n = 334; 80 w/ mental illness - this proportion is approximately equal to estimates of the general population diagnosed with mental illness (typically estimated at 20-25% according to various studies).*

Questions:

I identify as having a mental illness Response
Education  Response
I have my own computer separate from a smart phone Response
I have been hospitalized before for my mental illness  Response
How many days were you hospitalized for your mental illness Open-Ended Response
I am currently employed at least part-time Response
I am legally disabled  Response
I have my regular access to the internet  Response
I live with my parents Response
I have a gap in my resume  Response
Total length of any gaps in my resume in months.  Open-Ended Response
Annual income (including any social welfare programs) in USD  Open-Ended Response
I am unemployed Response
I read outside of work and school  Response
Annual income from social welfare programs Open-Ended Response
I receive food stamps  Response
I am on section 8 housing  Response
How many times were you hospitalized for your mental illness  Open-Ended Response

I have one of the following issues in addition to my illness:
  Lack of concentration
  Anxiety
  Depression
  Obsessive thinking
  Mood swings
  Panic attacks
  Compulsive behavior
  Tiredness

Age Response
Gender Response
Household Income  Response
Region Response
Device Type Response

Important data transformation note

When comparing the actual rate to government statistics, it is important to take into account the labor force participation rate (the % of people who are legally considered to be in the workforce). People not included in the unemployment statistic, like discouraged workers (for example the mentally ill) will be "not participating" in the workforce.

Other studies

1. Nami: https://www.nami.org/Press-Media/Press-Releases/2014/Mental-Illness-NAMI-Report-Deplores-80-Percent-Une

2. NIH: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4182106/

--- Original source retains full ownership of the source dataset ---

This data was produced during the pilot phase of developing Arts-Based Dynamic Interpersonal Therapy (ADIT) during March 2019 - August 2020, we administered a survey to investigate referrers acceptability of ADIT (March - July 2020), based on their experience of the referral process and knowledge of ADIT. We also asked whether ADIT was acceptable in terms of perceived benefit to patients and whether ADIT was perceived to be a good use of NHS resources. Further to this a clinical researcher group ranked specific practice elements according to how much they were required to produce sustainable change for the patient. Lastly the pre/post raw data for GAD-7 and PHQ-9 are presented in their raw form.

This dataset includes data from the Young and Well Towns (YAWT) Collaborative Research Centre (CRC) project. An uncontrolled trial was conducted that investigated the use and effect of mobile apps for mental health and wellbeing in young people. The study targeted adolescents and young adults (age 16 - 25) from Australia. Participants were asked to complete a profiling survey that assessed demographic characteristics, mental health, personality, and app use. Furthermore, they were asked to use and link a range of freely and commercially available health, fitness, or wellbeing apps. A range of app-specific metrics were assessed throughout the study period. Individuals were asked to use the mobile apps for a period of at least two weeks. Participants were continuously monitored over the study period with regard to subjective mood, sleep, rest and energy, through regular web-based self-report assessments.Date coverage: 2016-06-01 - 2017-01-31

The measure shows the percentage of adults receiving secondary mental health services living independently at the time of their most recent assessment, formal review or other multidisciplinary care planning meeting. Adults 'in contact with secondary mental health services' is defined as those aged 18 to 69 who are receiving secondary mental health services and who are on the Care Programme Approach (CPA). 'Living independently, with or without support' refers to accommodation arrangements where the occupier has security of tenure or appropriate stability of residence in their usual accommodation in the medium-to-long-term, or is part of a household whose head holds such security of tenure/residence. These accommodation arrangements are recorded as settled accommodation in the Mental Health Minimum Data Set. The calculation of the measure was changed in 2013-14. Previously, outcome scores were calculated from annual totals from the MHMDS, whereas now the outcome is calculated each month and the ASCOF measure for the year is derived as an average of these monthly scores. In 2017-18 The Mental Health Services Dataset (MHSDS) methodology has also been updated so that only whole numbers are published. Only covers people receiving partly or wholly supported care from their Local Authority and not wholly private, self-funded care. Data Source: Mental Health Minimum Data Set'. Data is Powered by LG Inform Plus and automatically checked for new data on the 3rd of each month.

This map shows the access to mental health providers in every county and state in the United States according to the 2024 County Health Rankings & Roadmaps data for counties, states, and the nation. It translates the numbers to explain how many additional mental health providers are needed in each county and state. According to the data, in the United States overall there are 319 people per mental health provider in the U.S. The maps clearly illustrate that access to mental health providers varies widely across the country.The data comes from this County Health Rankings 2024 layer. An updated layer is usually published each year, which allows comparisons from year to year. This map contains layers for 2024 and also for 2022 as a comparison.County Health Rankings & Roadmaps (CHR&R), a program of the University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute with support provided by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, draws attention to why there are differences in health within and across communities by measuring the health of nearly all counties in the nation. This map's layers contain 2024 CHR&R data for nation, state, and county levels. The CHR&R Annual Data Release is compiled using county-level measures from a variety of national and state data sources. CHR&R provides a snapshot of the health of nearly every county in the nation. A wide range of factors influence how long and how well we live, including: opportunities for education, income, safe housing and the right to shape policies and practices that impact our lives and futures. Health Outcomes tell us how long people live on average within a community, and how people experience physical and mental health in a community. Health Factors represent the things we can improve to support longer and healthier lives. They are indicators of the future health of our communities.Some example measures are:Life ExpectancyAccess to Exercise OpportunitiesUninsuredFlu VaccinationsChildren in PovertySchool Funding AdequacySevere Housing Cost BurdenBroadband AccessTo see a full list of variables, definitions and descriptions, explore the Fields information by clicking the Data tab here in the Item Details of this layer. For full documentation, visit the Measures page on the CHR&R website. Notable changes in the 2024 CHR&R Annual Data Release:Measures of birth and death now provide more detailed race categories including a separate category for ‘Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander’ and a ‘Two or more races’ category where possible. Find more information on the CHR&R website.Ranks are no longer calculated nor included in the dataset. CHR&R introduced a new graphic to the County Health Snapshots on their website that shows how a county fares relative to other counties in a state and nation. Data Processing:County Health Rankings data and metadata were prepared and formatted for Living Atlas use by the CHR&R team. 2021 U.S. boundaries are used in this dataset for a total of 3,143 counties. Analytic data files can be downloaded from the CHR&R website.

This submission includes publicly available data extracted in its original form. If you have questions about the underlying data stored here, please contact the SAMHSA Webmaster: webmaster@samhsa.hhs.gov. If you have questions or recommendations related to this metadata entry and extracted data, please contact the CAFE Data Management team at: climatecafe@bu.edu. N-SUMHSS releases yearly public-use files (PUFs). These are full datasets treated with confidentiality protections. The PUFs contain facility data on mental health and substance use treatment services. This includes location, characteristics, service provision and utilization of substance use and mental health treatment facilities. Note, the codebooks may not contain all variables. [Quote from https://www.samhsa.gov/data/data-we-collect/n-sumhss-national-substance-use-and-mental-health-services-survey/datafiles] The PUFs available each year have varied over time. This dataset is believed to contain a union of all the available PUFs. They include the N-SUMHSS files of the dataset title (2021 to 2023) but also N-MHSS files (2010 to 2020), N-SSATS files (1997-2020), and UFDS files (1997-1998). Most data is available in a variety of formats, including Delimited (tab or comma), R, SAS, SPSS, and Stata. Files are organized here in zip files by year. Within each year are one or more collection folders with names like: collection_1283-N-SUMHSS where the collection number was a value used in the web page dropdown control and the more meaningful abbreviation was derived from the actual filenames within the collection.