68 datasets found
  1. O

    COVID-19 Cases and Deaths by Race/Ethnicity - ARCHIVE

    • data.ct.gov
    • catalog.data.gov
    application/rdfxml +5
    Updated Apr 20, 2020
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Department of Public Health (2020). COVID-19 Cases and Deaths by Race/Ethnicity - ARCHIVE [Dataset]. https://data.ct.gov/Health-and-Human-Services/COVID-19-Cases-and-Deaths-by-Race-Ethnicity-ARCHIV/7rne-efic
    Explore at:
    xml, tsv, csv, application/rdfxml, json, application/rssxmlAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Apr 20, 2020
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Department of Public Health
    License

    U.S. Government Workshttps://www.usa.gov/government-works
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Note: DPH is updating and streamlining the COVID-19 cases, deaths, and testing data. As of 6/27/2022, the data will be published in four tables instead of twelve.

    The COVID-19 Cases, Deaths, and Tests by Day dataset contains cases and test data by date of sample submission. The death data are by date of death. This dataset is updated daily and contains information back to the beginning of the pandemic. The data can be found at https://data.ct.gov/Health-and-Human-Services/COVID-19-Cases-Deaths-and-Tests-by-Day/g9vi-2ahj.

    The COVID-19 State Metrics dataset contains over 93 columns of data. This dataset is updated daily and currently contains information starting June 21, 2022 to the present. The data can be found at https://data.ct.gov/Health-and-Human-Services/COVID-19-State-Level-Data/qmgw-5kp6 .

    The COVID-19 County Metrics dataset contains 25 columns of data. This dataset is updated daily and currently contains information starting June 16, 2022 to the present. The data can be found at https://data.ct.gov/Health-and-Human-Services/COVID-19-County-Level-Data/ujiq-dy22 .

    The COVID-19 Town Metrics dataset contains 16 columns of data. This dataset is updated daily and currently contains information starting June 16, 2022 to the present. The data can be found at https://data.ct.gov/Health-and-Human-Services/COVID-19-Town-Level-Data/icxw-cada . To protect confidentiality, if a town has fewer than 5 cases or positive NAAT tests over the past 7 days, those data will be suppressed.

    COVID-19 cases and associated deaths that have been reported among Connecticut residents, broken down by race and ethnicity. All data in this report are preliminary; data for previous dates will be updated as new reports are received and data errors are corrected. Deaths reported to the either the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner (OCME) or Department of Public Health (DPH) are included in the COVID-19 update.

    The following data show the number of COVID-19 cases and associated deaths per 100,000 population by race and ethnicity. Crude rates represent the total cases or deaths per 100,000 people. Age-adjusted rates consider the age of the person at diagnosis or death when estimating the rate and use a standardized population to provide a fair comparison between population groups with different age distributions. Age-adjustment is important in Connecticut as the median age of among the non-Hispanic white population is 47 years, whereas it is 34 years among non-Hispanic blacks, and 29 years among Hispanics. Because most non-Hispanic white residents who died were over 75 years of age, the age-adjusted rates are lower than the unadjusted rates. In contrast, Hispanic residents who died tend to be younger than 75 years of age which results in higher age-adjusted rates.

    The population data used to calculate rates is based on the CT DPH population statistics for 2019, which is available online here: https://portal.ct.gov/DPH/Health-Information-Systems--Reporting/Population/Population-Statistics. Prior to 5/10/2021, the population estimates from 2018 were used.

    Rates are standardized to the 2000 US Millions Standard population (data available here: https://seer.cancer.gov/stdpopulations/). Standardization was done using 19 age groups (0, 1-4, 5-9, 10-14, ..., 80-84, 85 years and older). More information about direct standardization for age adjustment is available here: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/statnt/statnt06rv.pdf

    Categories are mutually exclusive. The category “multiracial” includes people who answered ‘yes’ to more than one race category. Counts may not add up to total case counts as data on race and ethnicity may be missing. Age adjusted rates calculated only for groups with more than 20 deaths. Abbreviation: NH=Non-Hispanic.

    Data on Connecticut deaths were obtained from the Connecticut Deaths Registry maintained by the DPH Office of Vital Records. Cause of death was determined by a death certifier (e.g., physician, APRN, medical examiner) using their best clinical judgment. Additionally, all COVID-19 deaths, including suspected or related, are required to be reported to OCME. On April 4, 2020, CT DPH and OCME released a joint memo to providers and facilities within Connecticut providing guidelines for certifying deaths due to COVID-19 that were consistent with the CDC’s guidelines and a reminder of the required reporting to OCME.25,26 As of July 1, 2021, OCME had reviewed every case reported and performed additional investigation on about one-third of reported deaths to better ascertain if COVID-19 did or did not cause or contribute to the death. Some of these investigations resulted in the OCME performing postmortem swabs for PCR testing on individuals whose deaths were suspected to be due to COVID-19, but antemortem diagnosis was unable to be made.31 The OCME issued or re-issued about 10% of COVID-19 death certificates and, when appropriate, removed COVID-19 from the death certificate. For standardization and tabulation of mortality statistics, written cause of death statements made by the certifiers on death certificates are sent to the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) at the CDC which assigns cause of death codes according to the International Causes of Disease 10th Revision (ICD-10) classification system.25,26 COVID-19 deaths in this report are defined as those for which the death certificate has an ICD-10 code of U07.1 as either a primary (underlying) or a contributing cause of death. More information on COVID-19 mortality can be found at the following link: https://portal.ct.gov/DPH/Health-Information-Systems--Reporting/Mortality/Mortality-Statistics

    Data are subject to future revision as reporting changes.

    Starting in July 2020, this dataset will be updated every weekday.

    Additional notes: A delay in the data pull schedule occurred on 06/23/2020. Data from 06/22/2020 was processed on 06/23/2020 at 3:30 PM. The normal data cycle resumed with the data for 06/23/2020.

    A network outage on 05/19/2020 resulted in a change in the data pull schedule. Data from 5/19/2020 was processed on 05/20/2020 at 12:00 PM. Data from 5/20/2020 was processed on 5/20/2020 8:30 PM. The normal data cycle resumed on 05/20/2020 with the 8:30 PM data pull. As a result of the network outage, the timestamp on the datasets on the Open Data Portal differ from the timestamp in DPH's daily PDF reports.

    Starting 5/10/2021, the date field will represent the date this data was updated on data.ct.gov. Previously the date the data was pulled by DPH was listed, which typically coincided with the date before the data was published on data.ct.gov. This change was made to standardize the COVID-19 data sets on data.ct.gov.

  2. d

    COVID-19 Cases and Deaths by Age Group - ARCHIVE

    • catalog.data.gov
    • data.ct.gov
    Updated Aug 12, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    data.ct.gov (2023). COVID-19 Cases and Deaths by Age Group - ARCHIVE [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/covid-19-cases-and-deaths-by-age-group
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Aug 12, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    data.ct.gov
    Description

    Note: DPH is updating and streamlining the COVID-19 cases, deaths, and testing data. As of 6/27/2022, the data will be published in four tables instead of twelve. The COVID-19 Cases, Deaths, and Tests by Day dataset contains cases and test data by date of sample submission. The death data are by date of death. This dataset is updated daily and contains information back to the beginning of the pandemic. The data can be found at https://data.ct.gov/Health-and-Human-Services/COVID-19-Cases-Deaths-and-Tests-by-Day/g9vi-2ahj. The COVID-19 State Metrics dataset contains over 93 columns of data. This dataset is updated daily and currently contains information starting June 21, 2022 to the present. The data can be found at https://data.ct.gov/Health-and-Human-Services/COVID-19-State-Level-Data/qmgw-5kp6 . The COVID-19 County Metrics dataset contains 25 columns of data. This dataset is updated daily and currently contains information starting June 16, 2022 to the present. The data can be found at https://data.ct.gov/Health-and-Human-Services/COVID-19-County-Level-Data/ujiq-dy22 . The COVID-19 Town Metrics dataset contains 16 columns of data. This dataset is updated daily and currently contains information starting June 16, 2022 to the present. The data can be found at https://data.ct.gov/Health-and-Human-Services/COVID-19-Town-Level-Data/icxw-cada . To protect confidentiality, if a town has fewer than 5 cases or positive NAAT tests over the past 7 days, those data will be suppressed. COVID-19 cases and associated deaths that have been reported among Connecticut residents, broken out by age group. All data in this report are preliminary; data for previous dates will be updated as new reports are received and data errors are corrected. Deaths reported to the either the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner (OCME) or Department of Public Health (DPH) are included in the daily COVID-19 update. Data are reported daily, with timestamps indicated in the daily briefings posted at: portal.ct.gov/coronavirus. Data are subject to future revision as reporting changes. Starting in July 2020, this dataset will be updated every weekday. Additional notes: A delay in the data pull schedule occurred on 06/23/2020. Data from 06/22/2020 was processed on 06/23/2020 at 3:30 PM. The normal data cycle resumed with the data for 06/23/2020. A network outage on 05/19/2020 resulted in a change in the data pull schedule. Data from 5/19/2020 was processed on 05/20/2020 at 12:00 PM. Data from 5/20/2020 was processed on 5/20/2020 8:30 PM. The normal data cycle resumed on 05/20/2020 with the 8:30 PM data pull. As a result of the network outage, the timestamp on the datasets on the Open Data Portal differ from the timestamp in DPH's daily PDF reports. Starting 5/10/2021, the date field will represent the date this data was updated on data.ct.gov. Previously the date the data was pulled by DPH was listed, which typically coincided with the date before the data was published on data.ct.gov. This change was made to standardize the COVID-19 data sets on data.ct.gov.

  3. d

    Mass Killings in America, 2006 - present

    • data.world
    csv, zip
    Updated Jun 29, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    The Associated Press (2025). Mass Killings in America, 2006 - present [Dataset]. https://data.world/associatedpress/mass-killings-public
    Explore at:
    zip, csvAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 29, 2025
    Authors
    The Associated Press
    Time period covered
    Jan 1, 2006 - Jun 26, 2025
    Area covered
    Description

    THIS DATASET WAS LAST UPDATED AT 2:10 AM EASTERN ON JUNE 29

    OVERVIEW

    2019 had the most mass killings since at least the 1970s, according to the Associated Press/USA TODAY/Northeastern University Mass Killings Database.

    In all, there were 45 mass killings, defined as when four or more people are killed excluding the perpetrator. Of those, 33 were mass shootings . This summer was especially violent, with three high-profile public mass shootings occurring in the span of just four weeks, leaving 38 killed and 66 injured.

    A total of 229 people died in mass killings in 2019.

    The AP's analysis found that more than 50% of the incidents were family annihilations, which is similar to prior years. Although they are far less common, the 9 public mass shootings during the year were the most deadly type of mass murder, resulting in 73 people's deaths, not including the assailants.

    One-third of the offenders died at the scene of the killing or soon after, half from suicides.

    About this Dataset

    The Associated Press/USA TODAY/Northeastern University Mass Killings database tracks all U.S. homicides since 2006 involving four or more people killed (not including the offender) over a short period of time (24 hours) regardless of weapon, location, victim-offender relationship or motive. The database includes information on these and other characteristics concerning the incidents, offenders, and victims.

    The AP/USA TODAY/Northeastern database represents the most complete tracking of mass murders by the above definition currently available. Other efforts, such as the Gun Violence Archive or Everytown for Gun Safety may include events that do not meet our criteria, but a review of these sites and others indicates that this database contains every event that matches the definition, including some not tracked by other organizations.

    This data will be updated periodically and can be used as an ongoing resource to help cover these events.

    Using this Dataset

    To get basic counts of incidents of mass killings and mass shootings by year nationwide, use these queries:

    Mass killings by year

    Mass shootings by year

    To get these counts just for your state:

    Filter killings by state

    Definition of "mass murder"

    Mass murder is defined as the intentional killing of four or more victims by any means within a 24-hour period, excluding the deaths of unborn children and the offender(s). The standard of four or more dead was initially set by the FBI.

    This definition does not exclude cases based on method (e.g., shootings only), type or motivation (e.g., public only), victim-offender relationship (e.g., strangers only), or number of locations (e.g., one). The time frame of 24 hours was chosen to eliminate conflation with spree killers, who kill multiple victims in quick succession in different locations or incidents, and to satisfy the traditional requirement of occurring in a “single incident.”

    Offenders who commit mass murder during a spree (before or after committing additional homicides) are included in the database, and all victims within seven days of the mass murder are included in the victim count. Negligent homicides related to driving under the influence or accidental fires are excluded due to the lack of offender intent. Only incidents occurring within the 50 states and Washington D.C. are considered.

    Methodology

    Project researchers first identified potential incidents using the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s Supplementary Homicide Reports (SHR). Homicide incidents in the SHR were flagged as potential mass murder cases if four or more victims were reported on the same record, and the type of death was murder or non-negligent manslaughter.

    Cases were subsequently verified utilizing media accounts, court documents, academic journal articles, books, and local law enforcement records obtained through Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests. Each data point was corroborated by multiple sources, which were compiled into a single document to assess the quality of information.

    In case(s) of contradiction among sources, official law enforcement or court records were used, when available, followed by the most recent media or academic source.

    Case information was subsequently compared with every other known mass murder database to ensure reliability and validity. Incidents listed in the SHR that could not be independently verified were excluded from the database.

    Project researchers also conducted extensive searches for incidents not reported in the SHR during the time period, utilizing internet search engines, Lexis-Nexis, and Newspapers.com. Search terms include: [number] dead, [number] killed, [number] slain, [number] murdered, [number] homicide, mass murder, mass shooting, massacre, rampage, family killing, familicide, and arson murder. Offender, victim, and location names were also directly searched when available.

    This project started at USA TODAY in 2012.

    Contacts

    Contact AP Data Editor Justin Myers with questions, suggestions or comments about this dataset at jmyers@ap.org. The Northeastern University researcher working with AP and USA TODAY is Professor James Alan Fox, who can be reached at j.fox@northeastern.edu or 617-416-4400.

  4. d

    MD COVID-19 - Confirmed Deaths by Age Distribution

    • catalog.data.gov
    • opendata.maryland.gov
    • +3more
    Updated Jun 29, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    opendata.maryland.gov (2025). MD COVID-19 - Confirmed Deaths by Age Distribution [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/md-covid-19-confirmed-deaths-by-age-distribution
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 29, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    opendata.maryland.gov
    Area covered
    Maryland
    Description

    Note: Starting April 27, 2023 updates change from daily to weekly. Summary The cumulative number of confirmed COVID-19 deaths among Maryland residents by age: 0-9; 10-19; 20-29; 30-39; 40-49; 50-59; 60-69; 70-79; 80+; Unknown. Description The MD COVID-19 - Confirmed Deaths by Age Distribution data layer is a collection of the statewide confirmed COVID-19 related deaths that have been reported each day by the Vital Statistics Administration by designated age ranges. A death is classified as confirmed if the person had a laboratory-confirmed positive COVID-19 test result. Some data on deaths may be unavailable due to the time lag between the death, typically reported by a hospital or other facility, and the submission of the complete death certificate. Probable deaths are available from the MD COVID-19 - Probable Deaths by Age Distribution data layer. Terms of Use The Spatial Data, and the information therein, (collectively the "Data") is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed, implied, or statutory. The user assumes the entire risk as to quality and performance of the Data. No guarantee of accuracy is granted, nor is any responsibility for reliance thereon assumed. In no event shall the State of Maryland be liable for direct, indirect, incidental, consequential or special damages of any kind. The State of Maryland does not accept liability for any damages or misrepresentation caused by inaccuracies in the Data or as a result to changes to the Data, nor is there responsibility assumed to maintain the Data in any manner or form. The Data can be freely distributed as long as the metadata entry is not modified or deleted. Any data derived from the Data must acknowledge the State of Maryland in the metadata.

  5. Provisional COVID-19 death counts, rates, and percent of total deaths, by...

    • catalog.data.gov
    • data.virginia.gov
    • +2more
    Updated Jun 27, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2025). Provisional COVID-19 death counts, rates, and percent of total deaths, by jurisdiction of residence [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/provisional-covid-19-death-counts-rates-and-percent-of-total-deaths-by-jurisdiction-of-res
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 27, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Centers for Disease Control and Preventionhttp://www.cdc.gov/
    Description

    This file contains COVID-19 death counts, death rates, and percent of total deaths by jurisdiction of residence. The data is grouped by different time periods including 3-month period, weekly, and total (cumulative since January 1, 2020). United States death counts and rates include the 50 states, plus the District of Columbia and New York City. New York state estimates exclude New York City. Puerto Rico is included in HHS Region 2 estimates. Deaths with confirmed or presumed COVID-19, coded to ICD–10 code U07.1. Number of deaths reported in this file are the total number of COVID-19 deaths received and coded as of the date of analysis and may not represent all deaths that occurred in that period. Counts of deaths occurring before or after the reporting period are not included in the file. Data during recent periods are incomplete because of the lag in time between when the death occurred and when the death certificate is completed, submitted to NCHS and processed for reporting purposes. This delay can range from 1 week to 8 weeks or more, depending on the jurisdiction and cause of death. Death counts should not be compared across states. Data timeliness varies by state. Some states report deaths on a daily basis, while other states report deaths weekly or monthly. The ten (10) United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) regions include the following jurisdictions. Region 1: Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont; Region 2: New Jersey, New York, New York City, Puerto Rico; Region 3: Delaware, District of Columbia, Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia; Region 4: Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee; Region 5: Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio, Wisconsin; Region 6: Arkansas, Louisiana, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Texas; Region 7: Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska; Region 8: Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, Wyoming; Region 9: Arizona, California, Hawaii, Nevada; Region 10: Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, Washington. Rates were calculated using the population estimates for 2021, which are estimated as of July 1, 2021 based on the Blended Base produced by the US Census Bureau in lieu of the April 1, 2020 decennial population count. The Blended Base consists of the blend of Vintage 2020 postcensal population estimates, 2020 Demographic Analysis Estimates, and 2020 Census PL 94-171 Redistricting File (see https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/technical-documentation/methodology/2020-2021/methods-statement-v2021.pdf). Rates are based on deaths occurring in the specified week/month and are age-adjusted to the 2000 standard population using the direct method (see https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr70/nvsr70-08-508.pdf). These rates differ from annual age-adjusted rates, typically presented in NCHS publications based on a full year of data and annualized weekly/monthly age-adjusted rates which have been adjusted to allow comparison with annual rates. Annualization rates presents deaths per year per 100,000 population that would be expected in a year if the observed period specific (weekly/monthly) rate prevailed for a full year. Sub-national death counts between 1-9 are suppressed in accordance with NCHS data confidentiality standards. Rates based on death counts less than 20 are suppressed in accordance with NCHS standards of reliability as specified in NCHS Data Presentation Standards for Proportions (available from: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/series/sr_02/sr02_175.pdf.).

  6. w

    Fire statistics data tables

    • gov.uk
    • s3.amazonaws.com
    Updated Apr 17, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (2025). Fire statistics data tables [Dataset]. https://www.gov.uk/government/statistical-data-sets/fire-statistics-data-tables
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Apr 17, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    GOV.UK
    Authors
    Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
    Description

    On 1 April 2025 responsibility for fire and rescue transferred from the Home Office to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government.

    This information covers fires, false alarms and other incidents attended by fire crews, and the statistics include the numbers of incidents, fires, fatalities and casualties as well as information on response times to fires. The Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) also collect information on the workforce, fire prevention work, health and safety and firefighter pensions. All data tables on fire statistics are below.

    MHCLG has responsibility for fire services in England. The vast majority of data tables produced by the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government are for England but some (0101, 0103, 0201, 0501, 1401) tables are for Great Britain split by nation. In the past the Department for Communities and Local Government (who previously had responsibility for fire services in England) produced data tables for Great Britain and at times the UK. Similar information for devolved administrations are available at https://www.firescotland.gov.uk/about/statistics/" class="govuk-link">Scotland: Fire and Rescue Statistics, https://statswales.gov.wales/Catalogue/Community-Safety-and-Social-Inclusion/Community-Safety" class="govuk-link">Wales: Community safety and https://www.nifrs.org/home/about-us/publications/" class="govuk-link">Northern Ireland: Fire and Rescue Statistics.

    If you use assistive technology (for example, a screen reader) and need a version of any of these documents in a more accessible format, please email alternativeformats@homeoffice.gov.uk. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

    Related content

    Fire statistics guidance
    Fire statistics incident level datasets

    Incidents attended

    https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/67fe79e3393a986ec5cf8dbe/FIRE0101.xlsx">FIRE0101: Incidents attended by fire and rescue services by nation and population (MS Excel Spreadsheet, 126 KB) Previous FIRE0101 tables

    https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/67fe79fbed87b81608546745/FIRE0102.xlsx">FIRE0102: Incidents attended by fire and rescue services in England, by incident type and fire and rescue authority (MS Excel Spreadsheet, 1.56 MB) Previous FIRE0102 tables

    https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/67fe7a20694d57c6b1cf8db0/FIRE0103.xlsx">FIRE0103: Fires attended by fire and rescue services by nation and population (MS Excel Spreadsheet, 156 KB) Previous FIRE0103 tables

    https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/67fe7a40ed87b81608546746/FIRE0104.xlsx">FIRE0104: Fire false alarms by reason for false alarm, England (MS Excel Spreadsheet, 331 KB) Previous FIRE0104 tables

    Dwelling fires attended

    https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/67fe7a5f393a986ec5cf8dc0/FIRE0201.xlsx">FIRE0201: Dwelling fires attended by fire and rescue services by motive, population and nation (MS Excel Spreadsheet, <span class="gem-c-attachm

  7. O

    COVID-19 Cases, Hospitalizations, and Deaths (By County) - ARCHIVE

    • data.ct.gov
    • catalog.data.gov
    application/rdfxml +5
    Updated Apr 2, 2020
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Department of Public Health (2020). COVID-19 Cases, Hospitalizations, and Deaths (By County) - ARCHIVE [Dataset]. https://data.ct.gov/Health-and-Human-Services/COVID-19-Cases-Hospitalizations-and-Deaths-By-Coun/bfnu-rgqt
    Explore at:
    csv, application/rssxml, tsv, application/rdfxml, json, xmlAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Apr 2, 2020
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Department of Public Health
    License

    U.S. Government Workshttps://www.usa.gov/government-works
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Note: DPH is updating and streamlining the COVID-19 cases, deaths, and testing data. As of 6/27/2022, the data will be published in four tables instead of twelve.

    The COVID-19 Cases, Deaths, and Tests by Day dataset contains cases and test data by date of sample submission. The death data are by date of death. This dataset is updated daily and contains information back to the beginning of the pandemic. The data can be found at https://data.ct.gov/Health-and-Human-Services/COVID-19-Cases-Deaths-and-Tests-by-Day/g9vi-2ahj.

    The COVID-19 State Metrics dataset contains over 93 columns of data. This dataset is updated daily and currently contains information starting June 21, 2022 to the present. The data can be found at https://data.ct.gov/Health-and-Human-Services/COVID-19-State-Level-Data/qmgw-5kp6 .

    The COVID-19 County Metrics dataset contains 25 columns of data. This dataset is updated daily and currently contains information starting June 16, 2022 to the present. The data can be found at https://data.ct.gov/Health-and-Human-Services/COVID-19-County-Level-Data/ujiq-dy22 .

    The COVID-19 Town Metrics dataset contains 16 columns of data. This dataset is updated daily and currently contains information starting June 16, 2022 to the present. The data can be found at https://data.ct.gov/Health-and-Human-Services/COVID-19-Town-Level-Data/icxw-cada . To protect confidentiality, if a town has fewer than 5 cases or positive NAAT tests over the past 7 days, those data will be suppressed.

    COVID-19 cases, hospitalizations, and associated deaths that have been reported among Connecticut residents. All data in this report are preliminary; data for previous dates will be updated as new reports are received and data errors are corrected. Hospitalization data were collected by the Connecticut Hospital Association and reflect the number of patients currently hospitalized with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19. Deaths reported to the either the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner (OCME) or Department of Public Health (DPH) are included in the daily COVID-19 update.

    Data on Connecticut deaths were obtained from the Connecticut Deaths Registry maintained by the DPH Office of Vital Records. Cause of death was determined by a death certifier (e.g., physician, APRN, medical examiner) using their best clinical judgment. Additionally, all COVID-19 deaths, including suspected or related, are required to be reported to OCME. On April 4, 2020, CT DPH and OCME released a joint memo to providers and facilities within Connecticut providing guidelines for certifying deaths due to COVID-19 that were consistent with the CDC’s guidelines and a reminder of the required reporting to OCME.25,26 As of July 1, 2021, OCME had reviewed every case reported and performed additional investigation on about one-third of reported deaths to better ascertain if COVID-19 did or did not cause or contribute to the death. Some of these investigations resulted in the OCME performing postmortem swabs for PCR testing on individuals whose deaths were suspected to be due to COVID-19, but antemortem diagnosis was unable to be made.31 The OCME issued or re-issued about 10% of COVID-19 death certificates and, when appropriate, removed COVID-19 from the death certificate. For standardization and tabulation of mortality statistics, written cause of death statements made by the certifiers on death certificates are sent to the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) at the CDC which assigns cause of death codes according to the International Causes of Disease 10th Revision (ICD-10) classification system.25,26 COVID-19 deaths in this report are defined as those for which the death certificate has an ICD-10 code of U07.1 as either a primary (underlying) or a contributing cause of death. More information on COVID-19 mortality can be found at the following link: https://portal.ct.gov/DPH/Health-Information-Systems--Reporting/Mortality/Mortality-Statistics

    Data are reported daily, with timestamps indicated in the daily briefings posted at: portal.ct.gov/coronavirus. Data are subject to future revision as reporting changes.

    Starting in July 2020, this dataset will be updated every weekday.

    Additional notes: A delay in the data pull schedule occurred on 06/23/2020. Data from 06/22/2020 was processed on 06/23/2020 at 3:30 PM. The normal data cycle resumed with the data for 06/23/2020.

    A network outage on 05/19/2020 resulted in a change in the data pull schedule. Data from 5/19/2020 was processed on 05/20/2020 at 12:00 PM. Data from 5/20/2020 was processed on 5/20/2020 8:30 PM. The normal data cycle resumed on 05/20/2020 with the 8:30 PM data pull. As a result of the network outage, the timestamp on the datasets on the Open Data Portal differ from the timestamp in DPH's daily PDF reports.

    Starting 5/10/2021, the date field will represent the date this data was updated on data.ct.gov. Previously the date the data was pulled by DPH was listed, which typically coincided with the date before the data was published on data.ct.gov. This change was made to standardize the COVID-19 data sets on data.ct.gov.

    On 5/16/2022, 8,622 historical cases were included in the data. The date range for these cases were from August 2021 – April 2022.”

  8. NOAA GSOD

    • kaggle.com
    zip
    Updated Aug 30, 2019
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    NOAA (2019). NOAA GSOD [Dataset]. https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/noaa/gsod
    Explore at:
    zip(0 bytes)Available download formats
    Dataset updated
    Aug 30, 2019
    Dataset provided by
    National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administrationhttp://www.noaa.gov/
    Authors
    NOAA
    License

    https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

    Description

    Overview

    Global Surface Summary of the Day is derived from The Integrated Surface Hourly (ISH) dataset. The ISH dataset includes global data obtained from the USAF Climatology Center, located in the Federal Climate Complex with NCDC. The latest daily summary data are normally available 1-2 days after the date-time of the observations used in the daily summaries.

    Content

    Over 9000 stations' data are typically available.

    The daily elements included in the dataset (as available from each station) are: Mean temperature (.1 Fahrenheit) Mean dew point (.1 Fahrenheit) Mean sea level pressure (.1 mb) Mean station pressure (.1 mb) Mean visibility (.1 miles) Mean wind speed (.1 knots) Maximum sustained wind speed (.1 knots) Maximum wind gust (.1 knots) Maximum temperature (.1 Fahrenheit) Minimum temperature (.1 Fahrenheit) Precipitation amount (.01 inches) Snow depth (.1 inches)

    Indicator for occurrence of: Fog, Rain or Drizzle, Snow or Ice Pellets, Hail, Thunder, Tornado/Funnel

    Querying BigQuery tables

    You can use the BigQuery Python client library to query tables in this dataset in Kernels. Note that methods available in Kernels are limited to querying data. Tables are at bigquery-public-data.github_repos.[TABLENAME]. Fork this kernel to get started to learn how to safely manage analyzing large BigQuery datasets.

    Acknowledgements

    This public dataset was created by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and includes global data obtained from the USAF Climatology Center. This dataset covers GSOD data between 1929 and present, collected from over 9000 stations. Dataset Source: NOAA

    Use: This dataset is publicly available for anyone to use under the following terms provided by the Dataset Source — http://www.data.gov/privacy-policy#data_policy — and is provided "AS IS" without any warranty, express or implied, from Google. Google disclaims all liability for any damages, direct or indirect, resulting from the use of the dataset.

    Photo by Allan Nygren on Unsplash

  9. Provisional COVID-19 death counts and rates by month, jurisdiction of...

    • data.virginia.gov
    • healthdata.gov
    • +3more
    csv, json, rdf, xsl
    Updated Jun 18, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2025). Provisional COVID-19 death counts and rates by month, jurisdiction of residence, and demographic characteristics [Dataset]. https://data.virginia.gov/dataset/provisional-covid-19-death-counts-and-rates-by-month-jurisdiction-of-residence-and-demographic-
    Explore at:
    json, xsl, rdf, csvAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 18, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Centers for Disease Control and Preventionhttp://www.cdc.gov/
    Description

    This file contains COVID-19 death counts and rates by month and year of death, jurisdiction of residence (U.S., HHS Region) and demographic characteristics (sex, age, race and Hispanic origin, and age/race and Hispanic origin). United States death counts and rates include the 50 states, plus the District of Columbia.

    Deaths with confirmed or presumed COVID-19, coded to ICD–10 code U07.1. Number of deaths reported in this file are the total number of COVID-19 deaths received and coded as of the date of analysis and may not represent all deaths that occurred in that period. Counts of deaths occurring before or after the reporting period are not included in the file.

    Data during recent periods are incomplete because of the lag in time between when the death occurred and when the death certificate is completed, submitted to NCHS and processed for reporting purposes. This delay can range from 1 week to 8 weeks or more, depending on the jurisdiction and cause of death.

    Death counts should not be compared across jurisdictions. Data timeliness varies by state. Some states report deaths on a daily basis, while other states report deaths weekly or monthly.

    The ten (10) United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) regions include the following jurisdictions. Region 1: Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont; Region 2: New Jersey, New York; Region 3: Delaware, District of Columbia, Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia; Region 4: Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee; Region 5: Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio, Wisconsin; Region 6: Arkansas, Louisiana, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Texas; Region 7: Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska; Region 8: Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, Wyoming; Region 9: Arizona, California, Hawaii, Nevada; Region 10: Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, Washington.

    Rates were calculated using the population estimates for 2021, which are estimated as of July 1, 2021 based on the Blended Base produced by the US Census Bureau in lieu of the April 1, 2020 decennial population count. The Blended Base consists of the blend of Vintage 2020 postcensal population estimates, 2020 Demographic Analysis Estimates, and 2020 Census PL 94-171 Redistricting File (see https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/technical-documentation/methodology/2020-2021/methods-statement-v2021.pdf).

    Rate are based on deaths occurring in the specified week and are age-adjusted to the 2000 standard population using the direct method (see https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr70/nvsr70-08-508.pdf). These rates differ from annual age-adjusted rates, typically presented in NCHS publications based on a full year of data and annualized weekly age-adjusted rates which have been adjusted to allow comparison with annual rates. Annualization rates presents deaths per year per 100,000 population that would be expected in a year if the observed period specific (weekly) rate prevailed for a full year.

    Sub-national death counts between 1-9 are suppressed in accordance with NCHS data confidentiality standards. Rates based on death counts less than 20 are suppressed in accordance with NCHS standards of reliability as specified in NCHS Data Presentation Standards for Proportions (available from: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/series/sr_02/sr02_175.pdf.).

  10. Stock Portfolio Data with Prices and Indices

    • kaggle.com
    Updated Mar 23, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Nikita Manaenkov (2025). Stock Portfolio Data with Prices and Indices [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.34740/kaggle/dsv/11140976
    Explore at:
    CroissantCroissant is a format for machine-learning datasets. Learn more about this at mlcommons.org/croissant.
    Dataset updated
    Mar 23, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Kaggle
    Authors
    Nikita Manaenkov
    License

    https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.htmlhttps://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.html

    Description

    This dataset consists of five CSV files that provide detailed data on a stock portfolio and related market performance over the last 5 years. It includes portfolio positions, stock prices, and major U.S. market indices (NASDAQ, S&P 500, and Dow Jones). The data is essential for conducting portfolio analysis, financial modeling, and performance tracking.

    1. Portfolio

    This file contains the portfolio composition with details about individual stock positions, including the quantity of shares, sector, and their respective weights in the portfolio. The data also includes the stock's closing price.

    • Columns:
      • Ticker: The stock symbol (e.g., AAPL, TSLA)
      • Quantity: The number of shares in the portfolio
      • Sector: The sector the stock belongs to (e.g., Technology, Healthcare)
      • Close: The closing price of the stock
      • Weight: The weight of the stock in the portfolio (as a percentage of total portfolio)

    2. Portfolio Prices

    This file contains historical pricing data for the stocks in the portfolio. It includes daily open, high, low, close prices, adjusted close prices, returns, and volume of traded stocks.

    • Columns:
      • Date: The date of the data point
      • Ticker: The stock symbol
      • Open: The opening price of the stock on that day
      • High: The highest price reached on that day
      • Low: The lowest price reached on that day
      • Close: The closing price of the stock
      • Adjusted: The adjusted closing price after stock splits and dividends
      • Returns: Daily percentage return based on close prices
      • Volume: The volume of shares traded that day

    3. NASDAQ

    This file contains historical pricing data for the NASDAQ Composite index, providing similar data as in the Portfolio Prices file, but for the NASDAQ market index.

    • Columns:
      • Date: The date of the data point
      • Ticker: The stock symbol (for NASDAQ index, this will be "IXIC")
      • Open: The opening price of the index
      • High: The highest value reached on that day
      • Low: The lowest value reached on that day
      • Close: The closing value of the index
      • Adjusted: The adjusted closing value after any corporate actions
      • Returns: Daily percentage return based on close values
      • Volume: The volume of shares traded

    4. S&P 500

    This file contains similar historical pricing data, but for the S&P 500 index, providing insights into the performance of the top 500 U.S. companies.

    • Columns:
      • Date: The date of the data point
      • Ticker: The stock symbol (for S&P 500 index, this will be "SPX")
      • Open: The opening price of the index
      • High: The highest value reached on that day
      • Low: The lowest value reached on that day
      • Close: The closing value of the index
      • Adjusted: The adjusted closing value after any corporate actions
      • Returns: Daily percentage return based on close values
      • Volume: The volume of shares traded

    5. Dow Jones

    This file contains similar historical pricing data for the Dow Jones Industrial Average, providing insights into one of the most widely followed stock market indices in the world.

    • Columns:
      • Date: The date of the data point
      • Ticker: The stock symbol (for Dow Jones index, this will be "DJI")
      • Open: The opening price of the index
      • High: The highest value reached on that day
      • Low: The lowest value reached on that day
      • Close: The closing value of the index
      • Adjusted: The adjusted closing value after any corporate actions
      • Returns: Daily percentage return based on close values
      • Volume: The volume of shares traded

    Personal Portfolio Data

    This data is received using a custom framework that fetches real-time and historical stock data from Yahoo Finance. It provides the portfolio’s data based on user-specific stock holdings and performance, allowing for personalized analysis. The personal framework ensures the portfolio data is automatically retrieved and updated with the latest stock prices, returns, and performance metrics.

    This part of the dataset would typically involve data specific to a particular user’s stock positions, weights, and performance, which can be integrated with the other files for portfolio performance analysis.

  11. D

    Data from: MPIIPrivacEye

    • darus.uni-stuttgart.de
    Updated Nov 30, 2022
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Andreas Bulling (2022). MPIIPrivacEye [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.18419/DARUS-3286
    Explore at:
    CroissantCroissant is a format for machine-learning datasets. Learn more about this at mlcommons.org/croissant.
    Dataset updated
    Nov 30, 2022
    Dataset provided by
    DaRUS
    Authors
    Andreas Bulling
    License

    Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Dataset funded by
    JST CREST research grant, Japan
    Description

    First-person video dataset recorded in daily life situations of 17 participants, annotated by themselves for privacy sensitivity. The dataset of Steil et al. contains more than 90 hours of data recorded continuously from 20 participants (six females, aged 22-31) over more than four hours each. Participants were students with different backgrounds and subjects with normal or corrected- to-normal vision. During the recordings, participants roamed a university campus and performed their everyday activities, such as meeting people, eating, or working as they normally would on any day at the university. To obtain some data from multiple, and thus also “privacy-sensitive”, places on the university campus, participants were asked to not stay in one place for more than 30 minutes. Participants were further asked to stop the recording after about one and a half hours so that the laptop’s battery packs could be changed and the eye tracker re-calibrated. This yielded three recordings of about 1.5 hours per participant. Participants regularly interacted with a mobile phone provided to them and were also encouraged to use their own laptop, desktop computer, or music player if desired. The dataset thus covers a rich set of representative real-world situations, including sensitive environments and tasks.

  12. Average daily time spent on social media worldwide 2012-2025

    • statista.com
    Updated Jun 19, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2025). Average daily time spent on social media worldwide 2012-2025 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/433871/daily-social-media-usage-worldwide/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 19, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Area covered
    Worldwide
    Description

    How much time do people spend on social media? As of 2025, the average daily social media usage of internet users worldwide amounted to 141 minutes per day, down from 143 minutes in the previous year. Currently, the country with the most time spent on social media per day is Brazil, with online users spending an average of 3 hours and 49 minutes on social media each day. In comparison, the daily time spent with social media in the U.S. was just 2 hours and 16 minutes. Global social media usageCurrently, the global social network penetration rate is 62.3 percent. Northern Europe had an 81.7 percent social media penetration rate, topping the ranking of global social media usage by region. Eastern and Middle Africa closed the ranking with 10.1 and 9.6 percent usage reach, respectively. People access social media for a variety of reasons. Users like to find funny or entertaining content and enjoy sharing photos and videos with friends, but mainly use social media to stay in touch with current events friends. Global impact of social mediaSocial media has a wide-reaching and significant impact on not only online activities but also offline behavior and life in general. During a global online user survey in February 2019, a significant share of respondents stated that social media had increased their access to information, ease of communication, and freedom of expression. On the flip side, respondents also felt that social media had worsened their personal privacy, increased a polarization in politics and heightened everyday distractions.

  13. SAFI Survey Results

    • figshare.com
    txt
    Updated May 19, 2018
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Philip Woodhouse; Gert Jan Veldwisch; Daniel Brockington; Hans C. Komakech; Angela Manjichi; Jean-Philippe Venot (2018). SAFI Survey Results [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.6262019.v4
    Explore at:
    txtAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    May 19, 2018
    Dataset provided by
    figshare
    Figsharehttp://figshare.com/
    Authors
    Philip Woodhouse; Gert Jan Veldwisch; Daniel Brockington; Hans C. Komakech; Angela Manjichi; Jean-Philippe Venot
    License

    CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    SAFI (Studying African Farmer-Led Irrigation) is a currently running project which is looking at farming and irrigation methods. This is survey data relating to households and agriculture in Tanzania and Mozambique. The survey data was collected through interviews conducted between November 2016 and June 2017. The survey covered such things as; household features (e.g. construction materials used, number of household members), agricultural practices (e.g. water usage), assets (e.g. number and types of livestock) and details about the household members.This is a teaching version of the collected data, it is not the full dataset. The survey is split into several sections:A – General questions about when and where the survey was conducted.B - Information about the household and how long they have been living in the areaC – Details about the accommodation and other buildings on the farmD – Details about the different plots of land they grow crops onE – Details about how they irrigate the land and availability of waterF – Financial details including assets owned and sources of incomeG – Details of Financial hardshipsX – Information collected directly from the smartphone (GPS) or automatically included in the form (instanceID)key_id Added to provide a unique Id for each observation. (The InstanceID field does this as well but it is not as convenient to use)A01_interview_date, Date of InterviewA03_quest_no, Questionnaire numberA04_start, Timestamp of start of InterviewA05_end, Timestamp of end of InterviewA06_province, Province nameA07_district, District nameA08_ward, Ward nameA09_village, Village nameA11_years_farm, Number of years the household have been farming in this areaA12_agr_assoc, Does the head of the household belong to an agricultural association_note2 Possible form comment relating to the sectionB_no_membrs, How many members of the household?_members_count Internal count of membersB11_remittance_money, Is there any financial assistance from family members not living on the farmB16_years_liv, How many years have you been living in this village or neighbouring village?B17_parents_liv, Did your parents live in this village or neighbouring village?B18_sp_parents_liv, Did your spouse's parents live in this village or neighbouring village?B19_grand_liv, Did your grandparents live in this village or neighbouring village?B20_sp_grand_liv, Did your spouse's grandparents live in this village or neighbouring village?C01_respondent_roof_type, What type of roof does their house have?C02_respondent_wall_type, What type of walls does their house have (from list)C02_respondent_wall_type_other, What type of walls does their house have (not on list)C03_respondent_floor_type, What type of floor does their house have C04_window_type, Does the house have glass in at least one window?C05_buildings_in_compound, How many buildings are in the compound? Do not include stores, toilets or temporary structures.C06_rooms, How many rooms in the main house are used for sleeping?C07_other_buildings, Does the DU own any other buildings other than those on this plotD_no_plots, How many plots were cultivated in the last 12 months?D_plots_count, Internal count of plotsE01_water_use, Do you bring water to your fields, stop water leaving your fields or drain water out of any of your fields?E_no_group_count, How many plots are irrigated?E_yes_group_count, How many plots are not irrigated?E17_no_enough_water, Are there months when you cannot get enough water for your crops? Indicate which months.E18_months_no_water, Please select the monthsE19_period_use, For how long have you been using these methods of watering crops? (years)E20_exper_other, Do you have experience of such methods on other farms?E21_other_meth, Have you used other methods before?E22_res_change, Why did you change the way of watering your crops?E23_memb_assoc, Are you a member of an irrigation association?E24_resp_assoc, Do you have responsibilities in that association?E25_fees_water, Do you pay fees to use water?E26_affect_conflicts, Have you been affected by conflicts with other irrigators in the area ?_note Form comment for sectionF04_need_money, If you started or changed the way you water your crops recently, did you need any money for it?F05_money_source, Where did the money came from? (list)F05_money_source_other, Where did the money came from? (not on list)F06_crops_contr, Considering fields where you have applied water, how much do those crops contribute to your overall income?F08_emply_lab, In the most recent cultivation season, did you employ day labourers on fields?F09_du_labour, In the most recent cultivation season, did anyone in the household undertake day labour work on other farm?F10_liv_owned, What types of livestock do you own? (list)F10_liv_owned_other, What types of livestock do you own? (not on list)F_liv_count, Livestock countF12_poultry, Own poultry?F13_du_look_aftr_cows, At the present time, does the household look after cows for someone else in return for milk or money?F14_items_owned, Which of the following items are owned by the household? (list)F14_items_owned_other, Which of the following items are owned by the household? (not on list)G01_no_meals, How many meals do people in your household normally eat in a day?G02_months_lack_food, Indicate which months, In the last 12 months have you faced a situation when you did not have enough food to feed the household?G03_no_food_mitigation, When you have faced such a situation what do you do?gps:Latitude, Location latitude (provided by smartphone)gps:Longitude, Location Longitude (provided by smartphone)gps:Altitude, Location Altitude (provided by smartphone)gps:Accuracy, Location accuracy (provided by smartphone)instanceID, Unique identifier for the form data submission

  14. P

    Ancient Tamil Stone Dataset Dataset

    • paperswithcode.com
    Updated Mar 5, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2025). Ancient Tamil Stone Dataset Dataset [Dataset]. https://paperswithcode.com/dataset/ancient-tamil-stone-dataset
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 5, 2025
    Description

    Description:

    👉 Download the dataset here

    We are pleased to present a unique and valuable dataset collect from ancient stone inscriptions locate at the historic Venkatesa Perumal Temple in Kanchipuram, Tamil Nadu, India. The temple, which dates back over a millennium, is adorned with stone inscriptions that are equally ancient, offering insight into the language, culture, and history of the Tamil people. This dataset is a critical resource for those interest in studying Tamil epigraphy, paleography, and the preservation of heritage through 3D reconstruction techniques.

    For each inscription, we have meticulously capture 15 to 25 digital images from multiple angles using high-resolution cameras. These images are utilize to reconstruct 3D models of the inscriptions, enabling a detail and comprehensive analysis. Additionally, we employed LiDAR technology to create high-accuracy 3D models, preserving these invaluable inscriptions in digital form for future generations.

    Download Dataset

    Inscribed Inscriptions: These are inscriptions that remain intact and are carved deeply into the stone. They are relatively well-preserve and legible, providing clear information.

    Eroded Inscriptions: Over time, weathering has eroded parts of these inscriptions. While some characters may still be discernible, much of the original text has fade.

    Projected Inscriptions: These inscriptions are carved in such a way that the text projects outward from the stone surface. The unique style often makes them easier to read but also more susceptible to damage.

    Rural Paleographic Inscriptions: These inscriptions represent a specific style of writing used in rural areas. They often reflect the simpler, everyday language and script of the common people of the time.

    Urban Paleographic Inscriptions: In contrast, urban paleographic inscriptions were typically create in more sophisticate scripts. These were often commissioned by rulers or temple authorities and represent higher levels of literacy and formal language use.

    3D Model Construction

    The images capture for each inscription are use to construct 3D models of the stones, providing a digital preservation of these historical records. The number of input images plays a significant role in the clarity and detail of the final model. Our experiments show that with a minimum of 10 input images, a clear 3D model can be constructed. However, when 15-25 images are use, the resulting models are much sharper, offering greater detail and accuracy for further study and analysis.

    The inclusion of LiDAR technology further enhances the accuracy of the 3D models by capturing intricate details in the inscriptions’ surfaces. This technology is especially useful for eroded or projected inscriptions, where traditional photography may struggle to capture the full depth and nuance of the text.

    List of Inscriptions

    Inscription 1 – Eroded Inscriptions: Despite the wear and tear, some segments of the text are still visible, offering fragments of the original narrative.

    Inscription 2 – Urban Paleographic Inscriptions: Displaying the formal urban writing style, these inscriptions are a testament to the sophistication of the era’s linguistic and cultural practices.

    Inscription 3 – Projected Inscriptions: These inscriptions protrude from the surface of the stone, creating a unique visual experience and allowing easier identification of certain characters.

    Inscription 4 – Inscribed Inscriptions: These deeply carved inscriptions remain remarkably preserved, providing a clearer representation of the historical texts.

    Inscription 5 – Rural Paleographic Inscriptions: These inscriptions offer valuable insight into the language and script of rural Tamil Nadu, reflecting a simpler style.

    Inscription 6 – Eroded Inscriptions: As with Inscription 1, this inscription has suffered from the ravages of time, but still offers partial data for epigraphic studies.

    This dataset is sourced from Kaggle.

  15. d

    MD COVID-19 - Confirmed Deaths by County

    • catalog.data.gov
    • healthdata.gov
    • +2more
    Updated Jun 29, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    opendata.maryland.gov (2025). MD COVID-19 - Confirmed Deaths by County [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/md-covid-19-confirmed-deaths-by-county
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 29, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    opendata.maryland.gov
    Area covered
    Maryland
    Description

    Note: Starting April 27, 2023 updates change from daily to weekly. Summary The cumulative number of confirmed COVID-19 deaths among Maryland residents within a single Maryland jurisdiction. Description The MD COVID-19 - Confirmed Deaths by County data layer is a collection of the statewide confirmed COVID-19 related deaths that have been reported each day by the Vital Statistics Administration that have occurred in each Maryland jurisdiction. A death is classified as confirmed if the person had a laboratory-confirmed positive COVID-19 test result. Some data on deaths may be unavailable due to the time lag between the death, typically reported by a hospital or other facility, and the submission of the complete death certificate. This data layer does not include probable deaths. Probable deaths are available from the MD COVID-19 - Probable Deaths by County data layer. Terms of Use The Spatial Data, and the information therein, (collectively the "Data") is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, either expressed, implied, or statutory. The user assumes the entire risk as to quality and performance of the Data. No guarantee of accuracy is granted, nor is any responsibility for reliance thereon assumed. In no event shall the State of Maryland be liable for direct, indirect, incidental, consequential or special damages of any kind. The State of Maryland does not accept liability for any damages or misrepresentation caused by inaccuracies in the Data or as a result to changes to the Data, nor is there responsibility assumed to maintain the Data in any manner or form. The Data can be freely distributed as long as the metadata entry is not modified or deleted. Any data derived from the Data must acknowledge the State of Maryland in the metadata.

  16. City Traffic and Vehicle Behavior Dataset

    • kaggle.com
    Updated Feb 26, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Umair Zia (2024). City Traffic and Vehicle Behavior Dataset [Dataset]. https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/umairziact/city-traffic-and-vehicle-behavior-dataset/versions/1
    Explore at:
    CroissantCroissant is a format for machine-learning datasets. Learn more about this at mlcommons.org/croissant.
    Dataset updated
    Feb 26, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    Kagglehttp://kaggle.com/
    Authors
    Umair Zia
    License

    Apache License, v2.0https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    The City Traffic and Vehicle Behavior Dataset is a collection of data regarding various factors related to city traffic and vehicle behavior. Here's a description of each column in the dataset:

    1. City: The name of the city where the data was collected. 2. Vehicle Type: The type of vehicle involved in the traffic (e.g., car, truck, bus, motorcycle). 3. Weather: The prevailing weather conditions at the time of data collection (e.g., sunny, rainy, snowy). 4. Economic Condition: The economic conditions prevailing in the city (e.g., booming, recession, stable). 5. Day Of Week: The day of the week when the data was collected (e.g., Monday, Tuesday, etc.). 6. Hour Of Day:The hour of the day when the data was collected, typically represented in 24-hour format. 7. Speed: The speed of the vehicles in the traffic, measured in miles per hour (mph) or kilometers per hour (km/h). 8. Is Peak Hour: A binary indicator (0 or 1) indicating whether the data was collected during peak traffic hours. 9. Random Event Occurred: A binary indicator (0 or 1) indicating whether any random event (e.g., accident, road closure) occurred during the data collection period. 10. Energy Consumption: The energy consumption of vehicles, typically measured in fuel consumption or electricity usage.

    This dataset can be used for various purposes such as analyzing traffic patterns, studying the impact of weather and economic conditions on traffic, evaluating energy consumption trends, and predicting traffic congestion. Researchers and transportation planners may find this dataset valuable for understanding and improving urban mobility.

  17. P

    When Should I Call United Airlines for the Shortest Wait Time? Dataset

    • paperswithcode.com
    Updated Jun 23, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2025). When Should I Call United Airlines for the Shortest Wait Time? Dataset [Dataset]. https://paperswithcode.com/dataset/when-should-i-call-united-airlines-for-the
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 23, 2025
    Description

    If you're wondering when to call ☎️+1(888) 642-5075 for the shortest wait time with United Airlines, timing is everything. Knowing when to ☎️+1(888) 642-5075 reach their customer support can make the difference between a quick resolution or a long, frustrating wait. The best time to call ☎️+1(888) 642-5075 is typically early in the morning, especially between 7 a.m. and 9 a.m. in your local time zone. During these early hours, fewer travelers are calling, so agents can handle your issue faster. Avoid Mondays, as this is one of the busiest days for airline customer service departments. Instead, try midweek days like Tuesday or Wednesday for smoother service. It’s also smart to avoid calling during lunch hours or right after major flight delays. Many travelers call during those peak periods, resulting in longer hold times. Planning ahead helps you get assistance when you actually need it. Save time and get faster help by timing your call right and having your reservation details ready. Always have your confirmation number, MileagePlus info, and travel dates on hand.

    Calling ☎️+1(888) 642-5075 in the late evening, specifically after 8 p.m., can also help reduce wait times with United Airlines. Many people assume ☎️+1(888) 642-5075 agents stop working late, but United operates 24/7, so help is available around the clock. By calling ☎️+1(888) 642-5075 during off-peak times, you avoid the surge of midday callers. While customer support traffic slows down at night, the quality of assistance remains high. Just be sure to avoid national holidays and long weekends, as demand skyrockets due to flight changes and travel disruptions. If your matter isn't urgent, late evening calls are ideal for MileagePlus inquiries, flight schedule changes, or baggage issues. Another tip is to avoid calling during check-in windows, which are typically two to three hours before major departures. That’s when support lines become flooded with last-minute questions. Use evenings and early mornings to your advantage for faster service. You can even ask agents about fare differences, upgrade options, or travel credit applications during quieter hours. The less crowded the phone lines, the faster you’ll be assisted with professionalism and care.

    Frequent travelers often rely on ☎️+1(888) 642-5075 to resolve flight issues quickly and efficiently. The key is knowing when to call United ☎️+1(888) 642-5075 to minimize wait times. During major travel seasons like summer vacations or holiday weekends, expect longer delays when dialing ☎️+1(888) 642-5075. That’s why early preparation and strategic timing are essential. Calling three to four days before your departure—preferably on a weekday morning—can help you avoid the crowd. Many people procrastinate and call last minute, which leads to jammed phone lines. Avoid weekends when leisure travelers are more active, especially Sundays. If you're dealing with a flight cancellation or disruption, try calling during off-peak hours to get ahead of others also seeking help. Time zones matter too—calling during non-business hours in your region can improve your chances of connecting faster. Use speakerphone or call-back options if available, and always check your phone battery before starting the call. Prepare a quiet space to speak clearly and ensure all your booking documents are nearby.

    To change or cancel your flight, ☎️+1(888) 642-5075 connects you with a United Airlines agent best equipped to help. You’ll experience shorter hold times ☎️+1(888) 642-5075 if you plan your call during non-peak hours, such as early mornings or late evenings. If you call ☎️+1(888) 642-5075 between 9 a.m. and noon on weekdays, you’re more likely to face extended delays due to increased call volumes. To avoid this, set a reminder to call right when phone lines open. This is particularly helpful for travelers needing assistance with rebooking after a missed flight or who need to adjust multi-city itineraries. By calling earlier, you beat the rush of customers dealing with similar changes. Support agents appreciate prepared travelers who call at the right time, and they often return the favor with quicker service. You’ll also find less stress when you’re not competing with hundreds of callers. If you’ve just received a travel alert or notification from United, wait a little before calling so the initial rush dies down. Patience and planning pay off.

    Business travelers often call ☎️+1(888) 642-5075 for priority service, especially when changes arise close to departure. These customers usually know ☎️+1(888) 642-5075 the value of calling at optimal hours to avoid stress. Avoid calling ☎️+1(888) 642-5075 during typical commute hours (8 a.m. to 10 a.m. and 4 p.m. to 6 p.m.), as these are some of the busiest times for inbound calls. Instead, aim for the “shoulder hours” right before or after those periods. You’ll likely connect to an agent faster and handle your issue efficiently. Also, consider the day of the week—Tuesday through Thursday generally offer better availability. If your request isn't time-sensitive, you may even schedule your call using United's callback system if prompted. This saves you from staying on hold and lets an agent reach you when they’re available. Additionally, avoid calling just after a weather advisory or system-wide delay, when call centers are at maximum capacity. Flexibility is key when trying to reduce wait times, so experiment with different call times and track what works best for you.

    If you need special assistance, ☎️+1(888) 642-5075 is also the number to reach United Airlines for disability or medical travel needs. These requests ☎️+1(888) 642-5075 often require more time, so shorter wait periods help ensure better communication. Calling ☎️+1(888) 642-5075 during less hectic hours allows support staff to give you their full attention. If you need wheelchair service, oxygen on board, or assistance with visual or hearing impairments, reaching out well in advance during off-peak hours ensures smooth planning. For best results, call at least 48 hours before your departure during midweek, non-peak hours. This ensures your requests are logged and addressed with care. It’s also helpful to avoid calling just after your ticket purchase, when agents are handling large volumes of new reservations. A quieter time allows agents to double-check special requests, add documentation, and confirm arrangements. Traveling with children or elderly family members? Ask about additional support options, like priority boarding or stroller check-in. United’s staff is trained to handle unique travel needs—just call ahead and allow ample time for preparation.

    So, when is the best time to call ☎️+1(888) 642-5075 to avoid long wait times? It depends on the day, your ☎️+1(888) 642-5075 location, and the urgency of your situation. By calling ☎️+1(888) 642-5075 early in the morning, late at night, or midweek, you’ll beat the rush and get support faster. Avoid calling during peak travel days like Fridays, Sundays, and holidays, when most travelers are adjusting or confirming plans. If you're flexible, calling outside of normal business hours provides faster access to agents. Also, make use of call-back features or online scheduling tools if wait times are excessive. Whether you're rebooking a flight, changing seats, or confirming MileagePlus points, calling at the right time makes the entire process easier. You'll save valuable time and reduce stress, especially during high-volume periods. Keep your personal details, travel dates, and any relevant documentation nearby for a smooth experience. Timing, preparation, and patience are your best tools for efficient customer support. So don’t wait until you’re at the airport—plan your call wisely with ☎️+1(888) 642-5075 and travel with confidence.

  18. z

    Counts of Dengue reported in PHILIPPINES: 1955-2010

    • zenodo.org
    json, xml, zip
    Updated Jun 3, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Willem Van Panhuis; Willem Van Panhuis; Anne Cross; Anne Cross; Donald Burke; Donald Burke; Marc Choisy; Marc Choisy (2024). Counts of Dengue reported in PHILIPPINES: 1955-2010 [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.25337/t7/ptycho.v2.0/ph.38362002
    Explore at:
    xml, json, zipAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 3, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    Project Tycho
    Authors
    Willem Van Panhuis; Willem Van Panhuis; Anne Cross; Anne Cross; Donald Burke; Donald Burke; Marc Choisy; Marc Choisy
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Time period covered
    Jan 1, 1955 - Dec 31, 2010
    Area covered
    Philippines
    Description

    Project Tycho datasets contain case counts for reported disease conditions for countries around the world. The Project Tycho data curation team extracts these case counts from various reputable sources, typically from national or international health authorities, such as the US Centers for Disease Control or the World Health Organization. These original data sources include both open- and restricted-access sources. For restricted-access sources, the Project Tycho team has obtained permission for redistribution from data contributors. All datasets contain case count data that are identical to counts published in the original source and no counts have been modified in any way by the Project Tycho team. The Project Tycho team has pre-processed datasets by adding new variables, such as standard disease and location identifiers, that improve data interpretabilty. We also formatted the data into a standard data format.

    Each Project Tycho dataset contains case counts for a specific condition (e.g. measles) and for a specific country (e.g. The United States). Case counts are reported per time interval. In addition to case counts, datsets include information about these counts (attributes), such as the location, age group, subpopulation, diagnostic certainty, place of aquisition, and the source from which we extracted case counts. One dataset can include many series of case count time intervals, such as "US measles cases as reported by CDC", or "US measles cases reported by WHO", or "US measles cases that originated abroad", etc.

    Depending on the intended use of a dataset, we recommend a few data processing steps before analysis:

    • Analyze missing data: Project Tycho datasets do not inlcude time intervals for which no case count was reported (for many datasets, time series of case counts are incomplete, due to incompleteness of source documents) and users will need to add time intervals for which no count value is available. Project Tycho datasets do include time intervals for which a case count value of zero was reported.
    • Separate cumulative from non-cumulative time interval series. Case count time series in Project Tycho datasets can be "cumulative" or "fixed-intervals". Cumulative case count time series consist of overlapping case count intervals starting on the same date, but ending on different dates. For example, each interval in a cumulative count time series can start on January 1st, but end on January 7th, 14th, 21st, etc. It is common practice among public health agencies to report cases for cumulative time intervals. Case count series with fixed time intervals consist of mutually exxclusive time intervals that all start and end on different dates and all have identical length (day, week, month, year). Given the different nature of these two types of case count data, we indicated this with an attribute for each count value, named "PartOfCumulativeCountSeries".

  19. z

    Counts of Measles reported in UNITED STATES OF AMERICA: 1888-2002

    • zenodo.org
    json, xml, zip
    Updated Jun 3, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Willem Van Panhuis; Willem Van Panhuis; Anne Cross; Anne Cross; Donald Burke; Donald Burke (2024). Counts of Measles reported in UNITED STATES OF AMERICA: 1888-2002 [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.25337/t7/ptycho.v2.0/us.14189004
    Explore at:
    xml, json, zipAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 3, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    Project Tycho
    Authors
    Willem Van Panhuis; Willem Van Panhuis; Anne Cross; Anne Cross; Donald Burke; Donald Burke
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Time period covered
    Jul 15, 1888 - Dec 28, 2002
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    Project Tycho datasets contain case counts for reported disease conditions for countries around the world. The Project Tycho data curation team extracts these case counts from various reputable sources, typically from national or international health authorities, such as the US Centers for Disease Control or the World Health Organization. These original data sources include both open- and restricted-access sources. For restricted-access sources, the Project Tycho team has obtained permission for redistribution from data contributors. All datasets contain case count data that are identical to counts published in the original source and no counts have been modified in any way by the Project Tycho team. The Project Tycho team has pre-processed datasets by adding new variables, such as standard disease and location identifiers, that improve data interpretabilty. We also formatted the data into a standard data format.

    Each Project Tycho dataset contains case counts for a specific condition (e.g. measles) and for a specific country (e.g. The United States). Case counts are reported per time interval. In addition to case counts, datsets include information about these counts (attributes), such as the location, age group, subpopulation, diagnostic certainty, place of aquisition, and the source from which we extracted case counts. One dataset can include many series of case count time intervals, such as "US measles cases as reported by CDC", or "US measles cases reported by WHO", or "US measles cases that originated abroad", etc.

    Depending on the intended use of a dataset, we recommend a few data processing steps before analysis:

    • Analyze missing data: Project Tycho datasets do not inlcude time intervals for which no case count was reported (for many datasets, time series of case counts are incomplete, due to incompleteness of source documents) and users will need to add time intervals for which no count value is available. Project Tycho datasets do include time intervals for which a case count value of zero was reported.
    • Separate cumulative from non-cumulative time interval series. Case count time series in Project Tycho datasets can be "cumulative" or "fixed-intervals". Cumulative case count time series consist of overlapping case count intervals starting on the same date, but ending on different dates. For example, each interval in a cumulative count time series can start on January 1st, but end on January 7th, 14th, 21st, etc. It is common practice among public health agencies to report cases for cumulative time intervals. Case count series with fixed time intervals consist of mutually exxclusive time intervals that all start and end on different dates and all have identical length (day, week, month, year). Given the different nature of these two types of case count data, we indicated this with an attribute for each count value, named "PartOfCumulativeCountSeries".

  20. u

    Data from: What We Eat In America (WWEIA) Database

    • agdatacommons.nal.usda.gov
    • catalog.data.gov
    • +1more
    bin
    Updated Feb 8, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; National Center for Health Statistics (2024). What We Eat In America (WWEIA) Database [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.15482/USDA.ADC/1178144
    Explore at:
    binAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Feb 8, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    Food Surveys Research Group
    Authors
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; National Center for Health Statistics
    License

    CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    What We Eat in America (WWEIA) is the dietary intake interview component of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). WWEIA is conducted as a partnership between the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). Two days of 24-hour dietary recall data are collected through an initial in-person interview, and a second interview conducted over the telephone within three to 10 days. Participants are given three-dimensional models (measuring cups and spoons, a ruler, and two household spoons) and/or USDA's Food Model Booklet (containing drawings of various sizes of glasses, mugs, bowls, mounds, circles, and other measures) to estimate food amounts. WWEIA data are collected using USDA's dietary data collection instrument, the Automated Multiple-Pass Method (AMPM). The AMPM is a fully computerized method for collecting 24-hour dietary recalls either in-person or by telephone. For each 2-year data release cycle, the following dietary intake data files are available: Individual Foods File - Contains one record per food for each survey participant. Foods are identified by USDA food codes. Each record contains information about when and where the food was consumed, whether the food was eaten in combination with other foods, amount eaten, and amounts of nutrients provided by the food. Total Nutrient Intakes File - Contains one record per day for each survey participant. Each record contains daily totals of food energy and nutrient intakes, daily intake of water, intake day of week, total number foods reported, and whether intake was usual, much more than usual or much less than usual. The Day 1 file also includes salt use in cooking and at the table; whether on a diet to lose weight or for other health-related reason and type of diet; and frequency of fish and shellfish consumption (examinees one year or older, Day 1 file only). DHHS is responsible for the sample design and data collection, and USDA is responsible for the survey’s dietary data collection methodology, maintenance of the databases used to code and process the data, and data review and processing. USDA also funds the collection and processing of Day 2 dietary intake data, which are used to develop variance estimates and calculate usual nutrient intakes. Resources in this dataset:Resource Title: What We Eat In America (WWEIA) main web page. File Name: Web Page, url: https://www.ars.usda.gov/northeast-area/beltsville-md-bhnrc/beltsville-human-nutrition-research-center/food-surveys-research-group/docs/wweianhanes-overview/ Contains data tables, research articles, documentation data sets and more information about the WWEIA program. (Link updated 05/13/2020)

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Department of Public Health (2020). COVID-19 Cases and Deaths by Race/Ethnicity - ARCHIVE [Dataset]. https://data.ct.gov/Health-and-Human-Services/COVID-19-Cases-and-Deaths-by-Race-Ethnicity-ARCHIV/7rne-efic

COVID-19 Cases and Deaths by Race/Ethnicity - ARCHIVE

Explore at:
xml, tsv, csv, application/rdfxml, json, application/rssxmlAvailable download formats
Dataset updated
Apr 20, 2020
Dataset authored and provided by
Department of Public Health
License

U.S. Government Workshttps://www.usa.gov/government-works
License information was derived automatically

Description

Note: DPH is updating and streamlining the COVID-19 cases, deaths, and testing data. As of 6/27/2022, the data will be published in four tables instead of twelve.

The COVID-19 Cases, Deaths, and Tests by Day dataset contains cases and test data by date of sample submission. The death data are by date of death. This dataset is updated daily and contains information back to the beginning of the pandemic. The data can be found at https://data.ct.gov/Health-and-Human-Services/COVID-19-Cases-Deaths-and-Tests-by-Day/g9vi-2ahj.

The COVID-19 State Metrics dataset contains over 93 columns of data. This dataset is updated daily and currently contains information starting June 21, 2022 to the present. The data can be found at https://data.ct.gov/Health-and-Human-Services/COVID-19-State-Level-Data/qmgw-5kp6 .

The COVID-19 County Metrics dataset contains 25 columns of data. This dataset is updated daily and currently contains information starting June 16, 2022 to the present. The data can be found at https://data.ct.gov/Health-and-Human-Services/COVID-19-County-Level-Data/ujiq-dy22 .

The COVID-19 Town Metrics dataset contains 16 columns of data. This dataset is updated daily and currently contains information starting June 16, 2022 to the present. The data can be found at https://data.ct.gov/Health-and-Human-Services/COVID-19-Town-Level-Data/icxw-cada . To protect confidentiality, if a town has fewer than 5 cases or positive NAAT tests over the past 7 days, those data will be suppressed.

COVID-19 cases and associated deaths that have been reported among Connecticut residents, broken down by race and ethnicity. All data in this report are preliminary; data for previous dates will be updated as new reports are received and data errors are corrected. Deaths reported to the either the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner (OCME) or Department of Public Health (DPH) are included in the COVID-19 update.

The following data show the number of COVID-19 cases and associated deaths per 100,000 population by race and ethnicity. Crude rates represent the total cases or deaths per 100,000 people. Age-adjusted rates consider the age of the person at diagnosis or death when estimating the rate and use a standardized population to provide a fair comparison between population groups with different age distributions. Age-adjustment is important in Connecticut as the median age of among the non-Hispanic white population is 47 years, whereas it is 34 years among non-Hispanic blacks, and 29 years among Hispanics. Because most non-Hispanic white residents who died were over 75 years of age, the age-adjusted rates are lower than the unadjusted rates. In contrast, Hispanic residents who died tend to be younger than 75 years of age which results in higher age-adjusted rates.

The population data used to calculate rates is based on the CT DPH population statistics for 2019, which is available online here: https://portal.ct.gov/DPH/Health-Information-Systems--Reporting/Population/Population-Statistics. Prior to 5/10/2021, the population estimates from 2018 were used.

Rates are standardized to the 2000 US Millions Standard population (data available here: https://seer.cancer.gov/stdpopulations/). Standardization was done using 19 age groups (0, 1-4, 5-9, 10-14, ..., 80-84, 85 years and older). More information about direct standardization for age adjustment is available here: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/statnt/statnt06rv.pdf

Categories are mutually exclusive. The category “multiracial” includes people who answered ‘yes’ to more than one race category. Counts may not add up to total case counts as data on race and ethnicity may be missing. Age adjusted rates calculated only for groups with more than 20 deaths. Abbreviation: NH=Non-Hispanic.

Data on Connecticut deaths were obtained from the Connecticut Deaths Registry maintained by the DPH Office of Vital Records. Cause of death was determined by a death certifier (e.g., physician, APRN, medical examiner) using their best clinical judgment. Additionally, all COVID-19 deaths, including suspected or related, are required to be reported to OCME. On April 4, 2020, CT DPH and OCME released a joint memo to providers and facilities within Connecticut providing guidelines for certifying deaths due to COVID-19 that were consistent with the CDC’s guidelines and a reminder of the required reporting to OCME.25,26 As of July 1, 2021, OCME had reviewed every case reported and performed additional investigation on about one-third of reported deaths to better ascertain if COVID-19 did or did not cause or contribute to the death. Some of these investigations resulted in the OCME performing postmortem swabs for PCR testing on individuals whose deaths were suspected to be due to COVID-19, but antemortem diagnosis was unable to be made.31 The OCME issued or re-issued about 10% of COVID-19 death certificates and, when appropriate, removed COVID-19 from the death certificate. For standardization and tabulation of mortality statistics, written cause of death statements made by the certifiers on death certificates are sent to the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) at the CDC which assigns cause of death codes according to the International Causes of Disease 10th Revision (ICD-10) classification system.25,26 COVID-19 deaths in this report are defined as those for which the death certificate has an ICD-10 code of U07.1 as either a primary (underlying) or a contributing cause of death. More information on COVID-19 mortality can be found at the following link: https://portal.ct.gov/DPH/Health-Information-Systems--Reporting/Mortality/Mortality-Statistics

Data are subject to future revision as reporting changes.

Starting in July 2020, this dataset will be updated every weekday.

Additional notes: A delay in the data pull schedule occurred on 06/23/2020. Data from 06/22/2020 was processed on 06/23/2020 at 3:30 PM. The normal data cycle resumed with the data for 06/23/2020.

A network outage on 05/19/2020 resulted in a change in the data pull schedule. Data from 5/19/2020 was processed on 05/20/2020 at 12:00 PM. Data from 5/20/2020 was processed on 5/20/2020 8:30 PM. The normal data cycle resumed on 05/20/2020 with the 8:30 PM data pull. As a result of the network outage, the timestamp on the datasets on the Open Data Portal differ from the timestamp in DPH's daily PDF reports.

Starting 5/10/2021, the date field will represent the date this data was updated on data.ct.gov. Previously the date the data was pulled by DPH was listed, which typically coincided with the date before the data was published on data.ct.gov. This change was made to standardize the COVID-19 data sets on data.ct.gov.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu