Experimental statistics from the Mental Health Services Data Set (MHSDS), which replaces the Mental Health and Learning Disabilities Dataset (MHLDDS). As well as analysis of waiting times, first published in March 2016 using provisional submissions for January 2016, this release includes elements of the reports that were previously included in monthly reports produced from final MHLDDS submissions. It also includes some new measures.

A dataset containing basic conversations, mental health FAQ, classical therapy conversations, and general advice provided to people suffering from anxiety and depression.

This dataset can be used to train a model for a chatbot that can behave like a therapist in order to provide emotional support to people with anxiety & depression.

The dataset contains intents. An “intent” is the intention behind a user's message. For instance, If I were to say “I am sad” to the chatbot, the intent, in this case, would be “sad”. Depending upon the intent, there is a set of Patterns and Responses appropriate for the intent. Patterns are some examples of a user’s message which aligns with the intent while Responses are the replies that the chatbot provides in accordance with the intent. Various intents are defined and their patterns and responses are used as the model’s training data to identify a particular intent.

Mental Health reports the prevalence of the mental illness in the past year by age range.

This application provided a way for the public to explore and analyze VA Mental Health Statistics (FY2015 Annual Datasheet).

This release presents experimental statistics from the Mental Health Services Data Set (MHSDS), using final submissions for April 2016 and provisional submissions for May 2016. This is the fifth monthly release from the dataset, which replaces the Mental Health and Learning Disabilities Dataset (MHLDDS). As well as analysis of waiting times, first published in March 2016, this release includes elements of the reports that were previously included in monthly reports produced from final MHLDDS submissions. In this publication a new data file has been produced to present the data for people identified as having learning disabilities and/or autistic spectrum disorder (LDA) characteristics. Because of the scope of the changes to the dataset (resulting in the name change to MHSDS and the new name for these monthly reports) it will take time to re-introduce all possible measures that were previously part of the MHLDS Monthly Reports. Additional measures will be added to this report in the coming months. Further details about these changes and the consultation that informed were announced in November. From January 2016 the release includes information on people in children and young people's mental health services, including CAMHS, for the first time. Learning disabilities and autism services have been included since September 2014. This release of final data for April 2016 comprises: - An Executive Summary, which presents national-level analysis across the whole dataset and also for some specific service areas and age groups - Data tables about access and waiting times in mental health services for the based on provisional data for the period 1 March 2016 to 31 May 2016. - A monthly data file which presents 92 measures for mental health, learning disability and autism services at National, Provider and Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) level. - A Currency and Payments (CAP) data file, containing three measures relating to people assigned to Adult Mental Health Care Clusters. Further measures will be added in future releases. - A data file containing the measures relating to people with learning disabilities and/or autism. - Exploratory analysis of the coverage and completeness of access and waiting times statistics for people entering the Early Intervention in Psychosis pathway. - A set of provider level data quality measures for both months. The report comprises of validity measures for various data items at National and Provider level. From the publication of April data, a coverage report is included showing the number of providers submitting each month and number of records submitted. - A metadata file, which provide contextual information for each measure, including a full description, current uses, method used for analysis and some notes on usage. We will release the reports as experimental statistics until the characteristics of data flowed using the new data standard are understood. A correction has been made to this publication on 10 September 2018. This amendment relates to statistics in the monthly CSV data file; the specific measures effected are listed in the “Corrected Measures” CSV. All listed measures have now been corrected. NHS Digital apologises for any inconvenience caused.

VAMC-level statistics on the prevalence, mental health utilization, non-mental health utilization, mental health workload, and psychological testing of Veterans with a possible or confirmed diagnosis of mental illness. Information prepared by the VA Northeast Program Evaluation Center (NEPEC) for fiscal year 2015. This dataset is no longer supported and is provided as-is. Any historical knowledge regarding meta data or it's creation is no longer available. All known information is proved as part of this data set.

Mental Health in Tech Survey

Understanding Employee Mental Health Needs in the Tech Industry

By Stephen Myers [source]

About this dataset

This dataset contains survey responses from individuals in the tech industry about their mental health, including questions about treatment, workplace resources, and attitudes towards discussing mental health in the workplace. Mental health is an issue that affects all people of all ages, genders and walks of life. The prevalence of these issues within the tech industry–one that places hard demands on those who work in it–is no exception. By analyzing this dataset, we can better understand how prevalent mental health issues are among those who work in the tech sector.–and what kinds of resources they rely upon to find help–so that more can be done to create a healthier working environment for all.

This dataset tracks key measures such as age, gender and country to determine overall prevalence, along with responses surrounding employee access to care options; whether mental health or physical illness are being taken as seriously by employers; whether or not anonymity is protected with regards to seeking help; and how coworkers may perceive those struggling with mental illness issues such as depression or anxiety. With an ever-evolving landscape due to new technology advancing faster than ever before – these statistics have never been more important for us to analyze if we hope remain true promoters of a healthy world inside and outside our office walls

More Datasets

For more datasets, click here.

Featured Notebooks

• 🚨 Your notebook can be here! 🚨!

How to use the dataset

In this dataset you will find data on age, gender, country, and state of survey respondents in addition to numerous questions that assess an individual's mental state including: self-employment status, family history of mental illness, treatment status and access or lack thereof; how their mental health condition affects their work; number of employees at the company they work for; remote work status; tech company status; benefit information from employers such as mental health benefits and wellness program availability; anonymity protection if seeking treatment resources for substance abuse or mental health issues ; ease (or difficulty) for medical leave for a mental health condition ; whether discussing physical or medical matters with employers have negative consequences. You will also find comments from survey participants.

To use this dataset effectively: - Clean the data by removing invalid responses/duplicates/missing values - you can do this with basic Pandas commands like .dropna() , .drop_duplicates(), .replace(). - Utilize descriptive statistics such as mean and median to draw general conclusions about patterns of responses - you can do this with Pandas tools such as .groupby() and .describe(). - Run various types analyses such as mean comparisons on different kinds of variables(age vs gender), correlations between different features etc using appropriate statistical methods - use commands like Statsmodels' OLS models (.smf) , calculate z-scores , run hypothesis tests etc depending on what analysis is needed. Make sure you are aware any underlying assumptions your analysis requires beforehand !
- Visualize your results with plotting libraries like Matplotlib/Seaborn to easily interpret these findings! Use boxplots/histograms/heatmaps where appropriate depending on your question !

Research Ideas

• Using the results of this survey, you could develop targeted outreach campaigns directed at underrepresented groups that answer “No” to questions about their employers providing resources for mental health or discussing it as part of wellness programs.
• Analyzing the employee characteristics (e.g., age and gender) of those who reported negative consequences from discussing their mental health in the workplace could inform employer policies to support individuals with mental health conditions and reduce stigma and discrimination in the workplace.
• Correlating responses to questions about remote work, leave policies, and anonymity with whether or not individuals have sought treatment for a mental health condition may provide insight into which types of workplace resources are most beneficial for supporting employees dealing with these issues

Acknowledgements

If you use this dataset in your research, please credit the original authors. Data Source

License

License: Dataset copyright by authors - You are free to: - Share - copy and redi...

Percentage of individuals whose mental health affected by the COVID-19 pandemic

This dataset contains responses from an online survey of 2187 participants primarily located in the UK. All participants stated that they had used the UK National Health Service (NHS) at some time in their lives. The data were collected between December 2018 and August 2019. Participants' views on data sharing - this dataset contains information about people's willingness to share mental and physical health data for research purposes. It also includes information on willingness to share other types of data, such as financial information. The dataset includes participants' responses to questions relating to mental health data sharing, including the trustworthiness of organisations which use such data, how much the presence of different governance measures (such as deidentification, opt-out, etc.) would alter their views, and whether they would be less likely to access NHS mental health services if they knew their data might be shared with researchers. Participants' satisfaction and interaction with UK mental and physical health services - the dataset includes information regarding participants' views on and interaction with NHS services. This includes ratings of satisfaction at first contact and in the previous 12 months, frequency of use, and type of treatment received. Information about participants - the dataset includes information about participants' mental and physical health, including whether or not they have experience with specific mental health conditions, and how they would rate their mental and physical health at the time of the survey. There is also basic demographic information about the participants (e.g. age, gender, location etc.).

Objectives: Define the role of increasing cannabis availability on population mental health (MH).

Methods. Ecological cohort study of National Survey of Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) geographically-linked substate-shapefiles 2010-2012 and 2014-2016 supplemented by five-year US American Community Survey. Drugs: cigarettes, alcohol abuse, last-month cannabis use and last-year cocaine use. MH: any mental illness, major depressive illness, serious mental illness and suicidal thinking. Data analysis: two-stage and geotemporospatial methods in R.

Results: 410,138 NSDUH respondents. Average response rate 76.7%. When all drug exposure, ethnicity and income variables were combined in final geospatiotemporal models tobacco, alcohol cannabis exposure, and various ethnicities were significantly related to all four major mental health outcomes. Cannabis exposure alone was related to any mental illness (β-estimate= -3.315+0.374, P<2.2x10-16), major depressive episode (β-estimate= -3.712+0.454, P=3.0x10-16), serious mental illness (SMI, β-estimate= -3.063+0.504, P=1.2x10-9), suicidal ideation (β-estimate= -3.013+0.436, P=4.8x10-12) and with more significant interactions in each case (from β-estimate= 1.844+0.277, P=3.0x10-11). Geospatial modelling showed a monotonic upward trajectory of SMI which doubled (3.62% to 7.06%) as cannabis use increased. Extrapolated to whole populations cannabis decriminalization (4.35+0.05%, Prevalence Ratio (PR)=1.035(95%C.I. 1.034-1.036), attributable fraction in the exposed (AFE)=3.28%(3.18-3.37%), P<10-300) and legalization (4.66+0.09%, PR=1.155(1.153-1.158), AFE=12.91% (12.72-13.10%), P<10-300) were associated with increased SMI vs. illegal status (4.26+0.04%).

Conclusions: Data show all four indices of mental ill-health track cannabis exposure and are robust to multivariable adjustment for ethnicity, socioeconomics and other drug use. MH deteriorated with cannabis legalization. Together with similar international reports and numerous mechanistic studies preventative action to reduce cannabis use-exposure is indicated.

According to a March 2024 survey conducted in the United States, 32 percent of adults reported feeling that social media had neither a positive nor negative effect on their own mental health. Only seven percent of social media users said that online platforms had a very positive effect on their mental health, while 12 percent of users said it had a very negative impact. Furthermore, 22 percent of respondents said social media had a somewhat negative effect on their mental health. Is social media addictive? A 2023 survey of individuals between 11 and 59 years old in the United States found that over 73 percent of TikTok users agreed that the platform was addictive. Furthermore, nearly 27 percent of those surveyed reported experiencing negative psychological effects related to TikTok use. Users belonging to Generation Z were the most likely to say that TikTok is addictive, yet millennials felt the negative effects of using the app more so than Gen Z. In the U.S., it is also not uncommon for social media users to take breaks from using online platforms, and as of March 2024, over a third of adults in the country had done so. Following mental health-related content Although online users may be aware of the negative and addictive aspects of social media, it is also a useful tool for finding supportive content. In a global survey conducted in 2023, 32 percent of social media users followed therapists and mental health professionals on social media. Overall, 24 percent of respondents said that they followed people on social media if they had the same condition as they did. Between January 2020 and March 2023, British actress and model Cara Delevingne was the celebrity mental health activist with the highest growth in searches tying her name to the topic.

Percentage of individuals whose mental health affected by the COVID-19 pandemic

The Katie A. Settlement Agreement requires the Department of Health Care Services (DHCS) to collect and post data used to evaluate utilization of services and timely access to appropriate care. These county datasets show services used by children and youth (under the age of 21) identified as Katie A. Subclass members and/or utilizing Katie A. specialty mental health services (Intensive Care Coordination, Intensive Home Based Services, and Therapeutic Foster Care). This data assists in evaluating each county’s progress with implementing.

The measure shows the percentage of adults receiving secondary mental health services living independently at the time of their most recent assessment, formal review or other multidisciplinary care planning meeting. Adults 'in contact with secondary mental health services' is defined as those aged 18 to 69 who are receiving secondary mental health services and who are on the Care Programme Approach (CPA). 'Living independently, with or without support' refers to accommodation arrangements where the occupier has security of tenure or appropriate stability of residence in their usual accommodation in the medium-to-long-term, or is part of a household whose head holds such security of tenure/residence. These accommodation arrangements are recorded as settled accommodation in the Mental Health Minimum Data Set. The calculation of the measure was changed in 2013-14. Previously, outcome scores were calculated from annual totals from the MHMDS, whereas now the outcome is calculated each month and the ASCOF measure for the year is derived as an average of these monthly scores. In 2017-18 The Mental Health Services Dataset (MHSDS) methodology has also been updated so that only whole numbers are published. Only covers people receiving partly or wholly supported care from their Local Authority and not wholly private, self-funded care. Data Source: Mental Health Minimum Data Set'. Data is Powered by LG Inform Plus and automatically checked for new data on the 3rd of each month.

The U.S. Census Bureau, in collaboration with five federal agencies, launched the Household Pulse Survey to produce data on the social and economic impacts of Covid-19 on American households. The Household Pulse Survey was designed to gauge the impact of the pandemic on employment status, consumer spending, food security, housing, education disruptions, and dimensions of physical and mental wellness. The survey was designed to meet the goal of accurate and timely weekly estimates. It was conducted by an internet questionnaire, with invitations to participate sent by email and text message. The sample frame is the Census Bureau Master Address File Data. Housing units linked to one or more email addresses or cell phone numbers were randomly selected to participate, and one respondent from each housing unit was selected to respond for him or herself. Estimates are weighted to adjust for nonresponse and to match Census Bureau estimates of the population by age, sex, race and ethnicity, and educational attainment. All estimates shown meet the NCHS Data Presentation Standards for Proportions,

This data is a summary of the prevalence of residents in Travis County who reported experiencing 5 or more days of poor mental health in the past 30 days. The data comes from the self reported Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) survey from the CDC.

View more details and insights related to this data set on the story page: https://data.austintexas.gov/stories/s/HE-A-2-Percentage-of-people-who-report-5-or-more-p/mxzy-r35z/

Emergency Department Visits Related To Mental Health Conditions - This indicator shows the rate of emergency department visits related to mental health disorders (per 100,000 population). Mental health problems can place a heavy burden on the healthcare system, particularly when persons in crisis utilize emergency departments instead of other sources of care when available. In Maryland, there were 207,650 mental health disorder-related emergency department visits in 2014.Diagnoses include adjustment disorders, anxiety disorders, attention deficit disorders, disruptive behavior disorders, mood disorders, personality disorders, schizophrenia, and other psychotic disorders, suicide and intentional self-inflicted injury and miscellaneous mental disorders.

Indices of Deprivation (ID) 2004: Health Deprivation and Disability, measure of adults under 60 suffering from mood or anxiety disorders, based on prescribing, suicides, and health benefits data Source: Communities and Local Government (CLG): ID 2007 Publisher: Neighbourhood Statistics Geographies: Lower Layer Super Output Area (LSOA) Geographic coverage: England Time coverage: 2007 Type of data: Administrative data (with statistical transformations applied) Notes: These data represent a 'standardised and normalised measure' of mental health problems within an area rather than an absolute count or percentage of mental health problems.

Objectives: To identify the prevalence and factors associated with common mental disorders in adult women.Methods: Searches were carried out in the PubMed, Web of Science, Science Direct, Scopus, Cinahl, Google Scholar and Open Gray databases. The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO under number CRD42020168231. Cross-sectional studies showing the prevalence of common mental disorders in women over 18 years were included. Studies with men, children and pregnant women of another age group and with other mental disorders and other types of studies were excluded. The Joanna Briggs Institute checklist was used to assess the risk of bias.Results: Nineteen studies were included in this review. The prevalence of CMD ranged from 9.6% to 69.3%. The main associated factors were unemployment, indebtedness, low income, being a housewife, smoking, low education, poor self-rated health, being single, divorced or widowed. The risk of bias in the studies was classified as low and moderate.Conclusion: This review revealed a variable prevalence rate of CMD in adult women. Public policies are needed to create strategies to prevent the mental illness of these women.