16 datasets found
  1. b

    Apple Statistics (2025)

    • businessofapps.com
    Updated Jul 20, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Business of Apps (2025). Apple Statistics (2025) [Dataset]. https://www.businessofapps.com/data/apple-statistics/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 20, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Business of Apps
    License

    Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Apple is one of the most influential and recognisable brands in the world, responsible for the rise of the smartphone with the iPhone. Valued at over $2 trillion in 2021, it is also the most valuable...

  2. Number of global social network users 2017-2028

    • statista.com
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Stacy Jo Dixon, Number of global social network users 2017-2028 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/topics/1164/social-networks/
    Explore at:
    Dataset provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Authors
    Stacy Jo Dixon
    Description

    How many people use social media?

                  Social media usage is one of the most popular online activities. In 2024, over five billion people were using social media worldwide, a number projected to increase to over six billion in 2028.
    
                  Who uses social media?
                  Social networking is one of the most popular digital activities worldwide and it is no surprise that social networking penetration across all regions is constantly increasing. As of January 2023, the global social media usage rate stood at 59 percent. This figure is anticipated to grow as lesser developed digital markets catch up with other regions
                  when it comes to infrastructure development and the availability of cheap mobile devices. In fact, most of social media’s global growth is driven by the increasing usage of mobile devices. Mobile-first market Eastern Asia topped the global ranking of mobile social networking penetration, followed by established digital powerhouses such as the Americas and Northern Europe.
    
                  How much time do people spend on social media?
                  Social media is an integral part of daily internet usage. On average, internet users spend 151 minutes per day on social media and messaging apps, an increase of 40 minutes since 2015. On average, internet users in Latin America had the highest average time spent per day on social media.
    
                  What are the most popular social media platforms?
                  Market leader Facebook was the first social network to surpass one billion registered accounts and currently boasts approximately 2.9 billion monthly active users, making it the most popular social network worldwide. In June 2023, the top social media apps in the Apple App Store included mobile messaging apps WhatsApp and Telegram Messenger, as well as the ever-popular app version of Facebook.
    
  3. Apple iPhone sales worldwide 2007-2023

    • statista.com
    Updated Jul 7, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2025). Apple iPhone sales worldwide 2007-2023 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/276306/global-apple-iphone-sales-since-fiscal-year-2007/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 7, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Area covered
    Worldwide
    Description

    The number of Apple iPhone unit sales dramatically increased between 2007 and 2023. Indeed, in 2007, when the iPhone was first introduced, Apple shipped around *** million smartphones. By 2023, this number reached over *** million units. The newest models and iPhone’s lasting popularity Apple has ventured into its 17th smartphone generation with its Phone ** lineup, which, released in September 2023, includes the **, ** Plus, ** Pro and Pro Max. Powered by the A16 bionic chip and running on iOS **, these models present improved displays, cameras, and functionalities. On the one hand, such features come, however, with hefty price tags, namely, an average of ***** U.S. dollars. On the other hand, they contribute to making Apple among the leading smartphone vendors worldwide, along with Samsung and Xiaomi. In the first quarter of 2024, Samsung shipped over ** million smartphones, while Apple recorded shipments of roughly ** million units. Success of Apple’s other products Apart from the iPhone, which is Apple’s most profitable product, Apple is also the inventor of other heavy-weight players in the consumer electronics market. The Mac computer and the iPad, like the iPhone, are both pioneers in their respective markets and have helped popularize the use of PCs and tablets. The iPad is especially successful, having remained as the largest vendor in the tablet market ever since its debut. The hottest new Apple gadget is undoubtedly the Apple Watch, which is a line of smartwatches that has fitness tracking capabilities and can be integrated via iOS with other Apple products and services. The Apple Watch has also been staying ahead of other smart watch vendors since its initial release and secures around ** percent of the market share as of the latest quarter.

  4. Z

    Dataset of IEEE 802.11 probe requests from an uncontrolled urban environment...

    • data.niaid.nih.gov
    Updated Jan 6, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Andrej Hrovat (2023). Dataset of IEEE 802.11 probe requests from an uncontrolled urban environment [Dataset]. https://data.niaid.nih.gov/resources?id=zenodo_7509279
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jan 6, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Mihael Mohorčič
    Miha Mohorčič
    Aleš Simončič
    Andrej Hrovat
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Introduction

    The 802.11 standard includes several management features and corresponding frame types. One of them are Probe Requests (PR), which are sent by mobile devices in an unassociated state to scan the nearby area for existing wireless networks. The frame part of PRs consists of variable-length fields, called Information Elements (IE), which represent the capabilities of a mobile device, such as supported data rates.

    This dataset contains PRs collected over a seven-day period by four gateway devices in an uncontrolled urban environment in the city of Catania.

    It can be used for various use cases, e.g., analyzing MAC randomization, determining the number of people in a given location at a given time or in different time periods, analyzing trends in population movement (streets, shopping malls, etc.) in different time periods, etc.

    Related dataset

    Same authors also produced the Labeled dataset of IEEE 802.11 probe requests with same data layout and recording equipment.

    Measurement setup

    The system for collecting PRs consists of a Raspberry Pi 4 (RPi) with an additional WiFi dongle to capture WiFi signal traffic in monitoring mode (gateway device). Passive PR monitoring is performed by listening to 802.11 traffic and filtering out PR packets on a single WiFi channel.

    The following information about each received PR is collected: - MAC address - Supported data rates - extended supported rates - HT capabilities - extended capabilities - data under extended tag and vendor specific tag - interworking - VHT capabilities - RSSI - SSID - timestamp when PR was received.

    The collected data was forwarded to a remote database via a secure VPN connection. A Python script was written using the Pyshark package to collect, preprocess, and transmit the data.

    Data preprocessing

    The gateway collects PRs for each successive predefined scan interval (10 seconds). During this interval, the data is preprocessed before being transmitted to the database. For each detected PR in the scan interval, the IEs fields are saved in the following JSON structure:

    PR_IE_data = { 'DATA_RTS': {'SUPP': DATA_supp , 'EXT': DATA_ext}, 'HT_CAP': DATA_htcap, 'EXT_CAP': {'length': DATA_len, 'data': DATA_extcap}, 'VHT_CAP': DATA_vhtcap, 'INTERWORKING': DATA_inter, 'EXT_TAG': {'ID_1': DATA_1_ext, 'ID_2': DATA_2_ext ...}, 'VENDOR_SPEC': {VENDOR_1:{ 'ID_1': DATA_1_vendor1, 'ID_2': DATA_2_vendor1 ...}, VENDOR_2:{ 'ID_1': DATA_1_vendor2, 'ID_2': DATA_2_vendor2 ...} ...} }

    Supported data rates and extended supported rates are represented as arrays of values that encode information about the rates supported by a mobile device. The rest of the IEs data is represented in hexadecimal format. Vendor Specific Tag is structured differently than the other IEs. This field can contain multiple vendor IDs with multiple data IDs with corresponding data. Similarly, the extended tag can contain multiple data IDs with corresponding data.
    Missing IE fields in the captured PR are not included in PR_IE_DATA.

    When a new MAC address is detected in the current scan time interval, the data from PR is stored in the following structure:

    {'MAC': MAC_address, 'SSIDs': [ SSID ], 'PROBE_REQs': [PR_data] },

    where PR_data is structured as follows:

    { 'TIME': [ DATA_time ], 'RSSI': [ DATA_rssi ], 'DATA': PR_IE_data }.

    This data structure allows to store only 'TOA' and 'RSSI' for all PRs originating from the same MAC address and containing the same 'PR_IE_data'. All SSIDs from the same MAC address are also stored. The data of the newly detected PR is compared with the already stored data of the same MAC in the current scan time interval. If identical PR's IE data from the same MAC address is already stored, only data for the keys 'TIME' and 'RSSI' are appended. If identical PR's IE data from the same MAC address has not yet been received, then the PR_data structure of the new PR for that MAC address is appended to the 'PROBE_REQs' key. The preprocessing procedure is shown in Figure ./Figures/Preprocessing_procedure.png

    At the end of each scan time interval, all processed data is sent to the database along with additional metadata about the collected data, such as the serial number of the wireless gateway and the timestamps for the start and end of the scan. For an example of a single PR capture, see the Single_PR_capture_example.json file.

    Folder structure

    For ease of processing of the data, the dataset is divided into 7 folders, each containing a 24-hour period. Each folder contains four files, each containing samples from that device.

    The folders are named after the start and end time (in UTC). For example, the folder 2022-09-22T22-00-00_2022-09-23T22-00-00 contains samples collected between 23th of September 2022 00:00 local time, until 24th of September 2022 00:00 local time.

    Files representing their location via mapping: - 1.json -> location 1 - 2.json -> location 2 - 3.json -> location 3 - 4.json -> location 4

    Environments description

    The measurements were carried out in the city of Catania, in Piazza Università and Piazza del Duomo The gateway devices (rPIs with WiFi dongle) were set up and gathering data before the start time of this dataset. As of September 23, 2022, the devices were placed in their final configuration and personally checked for correctness of installation and data status of the entire data collection system. Devices were connected either to a nearby Ethernet outlet or via WiFi to the access point provided.

    Four Raspbery Pi-s were used: - location 1 -> Piazza del Duomo - Chierici building (balcony near Fontana dell’Amenano) - location 2 -> southernmost window in the building of Via Etnea near Piazza del Duomo - location 3 -> nothernmost window in the building of Via Etnea near Piazza Università - location 4 -> first window top the right of the entrance of the University of Catania

    Locations were suggested by the authors and adjusted during deployment based on physical constraints (locations of electrical outlets or internet access) Under ideal circumstances, the locations of the devices and their coverage area would cover both squares and the part of Via Etna between them, with a partial overlap of signal detection. The locations of the gateways are shown in Figure ./Figures/catania.png.

    Known dataset shortcomings

    Due to technical and physical limitations, the dataset contains some identified deficiencies.

    PRs are collected and transmitted in 10-second chunks. Due to the limited capabilites of the recording devices, some time (in the range of seconds) may not be accounted for between chunks if the transmission of the previous packet took too long or an unexpected error occurred.

    Every 20 minutes the service is restarted on the recording device. This is a workaround for undefined behavior of the USB WiFi dongle, which can no longer respond. For this reason, up to 20 seconds of data will not be recorded in each 20-minute period.

    The devices had a scheduled reboot at 4:00 each day which is shown as missing data of up to a few minutes.

     Location 1 - Piazza del Duomo - Chierici
    

    The gateway device (rPi) is located on the second floor balcony and is hardwired to the Ethernet port. This device appears to function stably throughout the data collection period. Its location is constant and is not disturbed, dataset seems to have complete coverage.

     Location 2 - Via Etnea - Piazza del Duomo
    

    The device is located inside the building. During working hours (approximately 9:00-17:00), the device was placed on the windowsill. However, the movement of the device cannot be confirmed. As the device was moved back and forth, power outages and internet connection issues occurred. The last three days in the record contain no PRs from this location.

     Location 3 - Via Etnea - Piazza Università
    

    Similar to Location 2, the device is placed on the windowsill and moved around by people working in the building. Similar behavior is also observed, e.g., it is placed on the windowsill and moved inside a thick wall when no people are present. This device appears to have been collecting data throughout the whole dataset period.

     Location 4 - Piazza Università
    

    This location is wirelessly connected to the access point. The device was placed statically on a windowsill overlooking the square. Due to physical limitations, the device had lost power several times during the deployment. The internet connection was also interrupted sporadically.

    Recognitions

    The data was collected within the scope of Resiloc project with the help of City of Catania and project partners.

  5. b

    App Store Data (2025)

    • businessofapps.com
    Updated Aug 1, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Business of Apps (2025). App Store Data (2025) [Dataset]. https://www.businessofapps.com/data/app-stores/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Aug 1, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Business of Apps
    License

    Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Apple App Store Key StatisticsApps & Games in the Apple App StoreApps in the Apple App StoreGames in the Apple App StoreMost Popular Apple App Store CategoriesPaid vs Free Apps in Apple App...

  6. Z

    Labeled dataset of IEEE 802.11 probe requests

    • data.niaid.nih.gov
    Updated Jan 6, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Miha Mohorčič (2023). Labeled dataset of IEEE 802.11 probe requests [Dataset]. https://data.niaid.nih.gov/resources?id=zenodo_7503593
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jan 6, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Mihael Mohorčič
    Miha Mohorčič
    Aleš Simončič
    Andrej Hrovat
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Introduction

    The 802.11 standard includes several management features and corresponding frame types. One of them are probe requests (PR). They are sent by mobile devices in the unassociated state to search the nearby area for existing wireless networks. The frame part of PRs consists of variable length fields called information elements (IE). IE fields represent the capabilities of a mobile device, such as data rates.
    The dataset includes PRs collected in a controlled rural environment and in a semi-controlled indoor environment under different measurement scenarios.
    It can be used for various use cases, e.g., analysing MAC randomization, determining the number of people in a given location at a given time or in different time periods, analysing trends in population movement (streets, shopping malls, etc.) in different time periods, etc.

    Measurement setup

    The system for collecting PRs consists of a Raspberry Pi 4 (RPi) with an additional WiFi dongle to capture Wi-Fi signal traffic in monitoring mode. Passive PR monitoring is performed by listening to 802.11 traffic and filtering out PR packets on a single WiFi channel. The following information about each PR received is collected: MAC address, Supported data rates, extended supported rates, HT capabilities, extended capabilities, data under extended tag and vendor specific tag, interworking, VHT capabilities, RSSI, SSID and timestamp when PR was received. The collected data was forwarded to a remote database via a secure VPN connection. A Python script was written using the Pyshark package for data collection, preprocessing and transmission.

    Data preprocessing

    The gateway collects PRs for each consecutive predefined scan interval (10 seconds). During this time interval, the data are preprocessed before being transmitted to the database. For each detected PR in the scan interval, IEs fields are saved in the following JSON structure: PR_IE_data = { 'DATA_RTS': {'SUPP': DATA_supp , 'EXT': DATA_ext}, 'HT_CAP': DATA_htcap, 'EXT_CAP': {'length': DATA_len, 'data': DATA_extcap}, 'VHT_CAP': DATA_vhtcap, 'INTERWORKING': DATA_inter, 'EXT_TAG': {'ID_1': DATA_1_ext, 'ID_2': DATA_2_ext ...}, 'VENDOR_SPEC': {VENDOR_1:{ 'ID_1': DATA_1_vendor1, 'ID_2': DATA_2_vendor1 ...}, VENDOR_2:{ 'ID_1': DATA_1_vendor2, 'ID_2': DATA_2_vendor2 ...} ...} }

    Supported data rates and extended supported rates are represented as arrays of values that encode information about the rates supported by a mobile device. The rest of the IEs data is represented in hexadecimal format. Vendor Specific Tag is structured differently than the other IEs. This field can contain multiple vendor IDs with multiple data IDs with corresponding data. Similarly, the extended tag can contain multiple data IDs with corresponding data.
    Missing IE fields in the captured PR are not included in PR_IE_DATA.

    When a new MAC address is detected in the current scan time interval, the data from PR is stored in the following structure:

    {'MAC': MAC_address, 'SSIDs': [ SSID ], 'PROBE_REQs': [PR_data] },

    where PR_data is structured as follows: { 'TIME': [ DATA_time ], 'RSSI': [ DATA_rssi ], 'DATA': PR_IE_data }.

    This data structure allows storing only TOA and RSSI for all PRs originating from the same MAC address and containing the same PR_IE_data. All SSIDs from the same MAC address are also stored.
    The data of the newly detected PR is compared with the already stored data of the same MAC in the current scan time interval.
    If identical PR's IE data from the same MAC address is already stored, then only data for the keys TIME and RSSI are appended. If no identical PR's IE data has yet been received from the same MAC address, then PR_data structure of the new PR for that MAC address is appended to PROBE_REQs key.
    The preprocessing procedure is shown in Figure ./Figures/Preprocessing_procedure.png
    At the end of each scan time interval, all processed data is sent to the database along with additional metadata about the collected data e.g. wireless gateway serial number and scan start and end timestamps. For an example of a single PR captured, see the ./Single_PR_capture_example.json file.

    Environments description

    We performed measurements in a controlled rural outdoor environment and in a semi-controlled indoor environment of the Jozef Stefan Institute. See the Excel spreadsheet Measurement_informations.xlsx for a list of mobile devices tested.

    Indoor environment

    We used 3 RPi's for the acquisition of PRs in the Jozef Stefan Institute. They were placed indoors in the hallways as shown in the ./Figures/RPi_locations_JSI.png. Measurements were performed on weekend to minimize additional uncontrolled traffic from users' mobile devices. While there is some overlap in WiFi coverage between the devices at the location 2 and 3, the device at location 1 has no overlap with the other two devices.

    Rural environment outdoors

    The three RPi's used to collect PRs were placed at three different locations with non-overlapping WiFi coverage, as shown in ./Figures/RPi_locations_rural_env.png. Before starting the measurement campaign, all measured devices were turned off and the environment was checked for active WiFi devices. We did not detect any unknown active devices sending WiFi packets in the RPi's coverage area, so the deployment can be considered fully controlled. All known WiFi enabled devices that were used to collect and send data to the database used a global MAC address, so they can be easily excluded in the preprocessing phase. MAC addresses of these devices can be found in the ./Measurement_informations.xlsx spreadsheet. Note: The Huawei P20 device with ID 4.3 was not included in the test in this environment.

    Scenarios description

    We performed three different scenarios of measurements.

    Individual device measurements

    For each device, we collected PRs for one minute with the screen on, followed by PRs collected for one minute with the screen off. In the indoor environment the WiFi interfaces of the other devices not being tested were disabled. In rural environment other devices were turned off. Start and end timestamps of the recorded data for each device can be found in the ./Measurement_informations.xlsx spreadsheet under the Indoor environment of Jozef Stefan Institute sheet and the Rural environment sheet.

    Three groups test

    In this measurement scenario, the devices were divided into three groups. The first group contained devices from different manufacturers. The second group contained devices from only one manufacturer (Samsung). Half of the third group consisted of devices from the same manufacturer (Huawei), and the other half of devices from different manufacturers. The distribution of devices among the groups can be found in the ./Measurement_informations.xlsx spreadsheet.

    The same data collection procedure was used for all three groups. Data for each group were collected in both environments at three different RPis locations, as shown in ./Figures/RPi_locations_JSI.png and ./Figures/RPi_locations_rural_env.png.
    At each location, PRs were collected from each group for 10 minutes with the screen on. Then all three groups switched locations and the process was repeated. Thus, the dataset contains measurements from all three RPi locations of all three groups of devices in both measurement environments. The group movements and the timestamps for the start and end of the collection of PRs at each loacation can be found in spreadsheet ./Measurement_informations.xlsx.

    One group test

    In the last measurement scenario, all devices were grouped together. In rural evironement we first collected PRs for 10 minutes while the screen was on, and then for another 10 minutes while the screen was off. In indoor environment data were collected at first location with screens on for 10 minutes. Then all devices were moved to the location of the next RPi and PRs were collected for 5 minutes with the screen on and then for another 5 minutes with the screen off.

    Folder structure

    The root directory contains two files in JSON format for each of the environments where the measurements took place (Data_indoor_environment.json and Data_rural_environment.json). Both files contain collected PRs for the entire day that the measurements were taken (12:00 AM to 12:00 PM) to get a sense of the behaviour of the unknown devices in each environment. The spreadsheet ./Measurement_informations.xlsx. contains three sheets. Devices description contains general information about the tested devices, RPis, and the assigned group for each device. The sheets Indoor environment of Jozef Stefan Institute and Rural environment contain the corresponding timestamps for the start and end of each measurement scenario. For the scenario where the devices were divided into groups, additional information about the movements between locations is included. The location names are based on the RPi gateway ID and may differ from those on the figures showing the locations of the RPIs for each environment. The ./Figures folder contains the figures already mentioned above.

  7. B2B Technographic Data in the US Techsalerator

    • kaggle.com
    Updated Sep 8, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Techsalerator (2024). B2B Technographic Data in the US Techsalerator [Dataset]. https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/techsalerator/technographic-data-in-the-united-states
    Explore at:
    CroissantCroissant is a format for machine-learning datasets. Learn more about this at mlcommons.org/croissant.
    Dataset updated
    Sep 8, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    Kagglehttp://kaggle.com/
    Authors
    Techsalerator
    License

    Apache License, v2.0https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Techsalerator’s Business Technographic Data for United States provides a thorough and insightful collection of information essential for businesses, market analysts, and technology vendors. This dataset offers a deep dive into the technological landscape of companies operating in United States, capturing and categorizing data related to their technology stacks, digital tools, and IT infrastructure.

    Please reach out to us at info@techsalerator.com or https://www.techsalerator.com/contact-us

    Top 5 Most Utilized Data Fields Company Name: This field lists the name of the company being analyzed. Understanding the companies helps technology vendors target their solutions and enables market analysts to evaluate technology adoption trends within specific businesses. Technology Stack: This field details the technologies and software solutions a company utilizes, such as CRM systems, ERP software, and cloud services. Knowledge of a company’s technology stack is vital for understanding its operational capabilities and technology needs. Deployment Status: This field indicates whether the technology is currently in use, planned for deployment, or under evaluation. This status helps vendors gauge the level of interest and current adoption among businesses. Industry Sector: This field identifies the industry sector in which the company operates, such as finance, manufacturing, or retail. Segmenting by industry sector helps vendors tailor their offerings to specific market needs and trends. Geographic Location: This field provides the geographic location of the company's headquarters or primary operations within United States. This information is useful for regional market analysis and understanding local technology adoption patterns. Top 5 Technology Trends in the United States Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning: AI and ML continue to drive innovation across various sectors, from autonomous vehicles and healthcare to finance and customer service. Key advancements include natural language processing, computer vision, and reinforcement learning. Cloud Computing and Edge Computing: The shift towards cloud computing remains strong, with major providers like AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud leading the way. Edge computing is also gaining traction, enabling faster processing and data analysis closer to the source, which is crucial for IoT applications. 5G Technology: The rollout of 5G networks is transforming connectivity, enabling faster data speeds, lower latency, and new applications in IoT, smart cities, and augmented reality (AR). Major telecom companies and technology providers are heavily invested in this technology. Cybersecurity and Privacy: As digital threats become more sophisticated, there is an increased focus on cybersecurity solutions, including threat detection, data encryption, and privacy protection. Innovations in this space aim to combat ransomware, data breaches, and other cyber risks. Blockchain and Decentralized Finance (DeFi): Blockchain technology is expanding beyond cryptocurrencies, with applications in supply chain management, digital identity, and smart contracts. DeFi is a growing sector within blockchain, offering decentralized financial services and products. Top 5 Companies with Notable Technographic Data in the United States Microsoft: A leading technology company known for its software, cloud computing services (Azure), and AI research. Microsoft's diverse portfolio includes operating systems, enterprise solutions, and gaming (Xbox). Google (Alphabet Inc.): A major player in search engines, cloud computing, AI, and consumer electronics. Google is at the forefront of innovations in machine learning, autonomous driving (Waymo), and digital advertising. Amazon: Known for its e-commerce platform, Amazon is also a significant force in cloud computing (AWS), AI, and logistics. AWS is a leading cloud service provider, and Amazon's technology initiatives span various industries. Apple Inc.: Renowned for its consumer electronics, including iPhones, iPads, and Macs. Apple is also investing in emerging technologies such as AR, wearable technology (Apple Watch), and health tech. IBM: A historic leader in technology and consulting services, IBM focuses on enterprise solutions, cloud computing, AI (IBM Watson), and quantum computing. The company is known for its research and development in cutting-edge technologies. Accessing Techsalerator’s Business Technographic Data If you’re interested in obtaining Techsalerator’s Business Technographic Data for United States, please contact info@techsalerator.com with your specific requirements. Techsalerator will provide a customized quote based on the number of data fields and records you need, with the dataset available for delivery within 24 hours. Ongoing access options can also be discussed as needed.

    Included Data Fields Company Name Technology Stack Depl...

  8. Laptop Dataset (Clean)

    • kaggle.com
    Updated Feb 19, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Shahriar Kabir (2024). Laptop Dataset (Clean) [Dataset]. https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/shahriarkabir/laptop-dataset-clean
    Explore at:
    CroissantCroissant is a format for machine-learning datasets. Learn more about this at mlcommons.org/croissant.
    Dataset updated
    Feb 19, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    Kagglehttp://kaggle.com/
    Authors
    Shahriar Kabir
    License

    https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

    Description

    Here are the descriptions of the columns:

    1. brand_name: The name of the brand or manufacturer of the laptop.
    2. name: The model name or identifier of the laptop.
    3. processor_type: The type of processor used in the laptop (e.g., Intel Core i5, AMD Ryzen 7, Apple M1).
    4. processor_brand: The brand of the processor (e.g., Intel, AMD, Apple).
    5. generations: The generation of the processor (e.g., 11th, 12th, 13th).
    6. ram: The amount of RAM (Random Access Memory) in gigabytes (GB) installed in the laptop.
    7. storage_capacity_gb: The total storage capacity of the laptop's storage device(s) in gigabytes (GB).
    8. have_ssd: A boolean value indicating whether the laptop has a Solid State Drive (SSD) or not.
    9. have_hdd: A boolean value indicating whether the laptop has a Hard Disk Drive (HDD) or not.
    10. graphics_capacity: The graphics capacity or dedicated graphics memory in gigabytes (GB), if applicable.
    11. price: The price of the laptop in the specified currency.
    12. display_size_inch: The size of the laptop's display screen in inches.
    13. display_type: The type of display technology used in the laptop (e.g., FHD, OLED, Liquid Retina).
    14. color: The color of the laptop.
  9. Number of smartphone users in the United States 2014-2029

    • statista.com
    Updated May 5, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista Research Department (2025). Number of smartphone users in the United States 2014-2029 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/topics/2711/us-smartphone-market/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    May 5, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Authors
    Statista Research Department
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    The number of smartphone users in the United States was forecast to continuously increase between 2024 and 2029 by in total 17.4 million users (+5.61 percent). After the fifteenth consecutive increasing year, the smartphone user base is estimated to reach 327.54 million users and therefore a new peak in 2029. Notably, the number of smartphone users of was continuously increasing over the past years.Smartphone users here are limited to internet users of any age using a smartphone. The shown figures have been derived from survey data that has been processed to estimate missing demographics.The shown data are an excerpt of Statista's Key Market Indicators (KMI). The KMI are a collection of primary and secondary indicators on the macro-economic, demographic and technological environment in up to 150 countries and regions worldwide. All indicators are sourced from international and national statistical offices, trade associations and the trade press and they are processed to generate comparable data sets (see supplementary notes under details for more information).Find more key insights for the number of smartphone users in countries like Mexico and Canada.

  10. Apple Stock Price (All Time)

    • kaggle.com
    zip
    Updated Oct 27, 2021
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Kannan Ravinther (2021). Apple Stock Price (All Time) [Dataset]. https://www.kaggle.com/kannan1314/apple-stock-price-all-time
    Explore at:
    zip(207260 bytes)Available download formats
    Dataset updated
    Oct 27, 2021
    Authors
    Kannan Ravinther
    License

    https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

    Description

    Company Description

    Apple, Inc. engages in the design, manufacture, and sale of smartphones, personal computers, tablets, wearables and accessories, and other variety of related services. It operates through the following geographical segments: Americas, Europe, Greater China, Japan, and Rest of Asia Pacific. The Americas segment includes North and South America. The Europe segment consists of European countries, as well as India, the Middle East, and Africa. The Greater China segment comprises of China, Hong Kong, and Taiwan. The Rest of Asia Pacific segment includes Australia and Asian countries. Its products and services include iPhone, Mac, iPad, AirPods, Apple TV, Apple Watch, Beats products, Apple Care, iCloud, digital content stores, streaming, and licensing services. The company was founded by Steven Paul Jobs, Ronald Gerald Wayne, and Stephen G. Wozniak in April 1976 and is headquartered in Cupertino, CA.

    Contact Information

    Apple, Inc. One Apple Park Way Cupertino California 95014-2083 P:(408) 996-1010 (669) 227-2402 www.apple.com

    Shareholders

    Other institutional 30.77% Mutual fund holders 27.82% Individual stakeholders 0.33%

  11. Apple / Google / Facebook Stock Price

    • kaggle.com
    Updated Sep 11, 2022
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Olga Vainer (2022). Apple / Google / Facebook Stock Price [Dataset]. https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/vainero/google-apple-facebook-stock-price/data
    Explore at:
    CroissantCroissant is a format for machine-learning datasets. Learn more about this at mlcommons.org/croissant.
    Dataset updated
    Sep 11, 2022
    Dataset provided by
    Kagglehttp://kaggle.com/
    Authors
    Olga Vainer
    License

    https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

    Description

    Context

    Technology companies have become a dominant driver in recent years of economic growth, consumer tastes and the financial markets. The biggest tech stocks as a group, for example, have dramatically outpaced the broader market in the past decade.

    That's because technology has reshaped in a major way how people communicate, consume information, shop, socialize, and work.

    Broadly speaking, companies in the technology sector engage in the research, development, and manufacture of technologically based goods and services. They create software, and design and manufacture computers, mobile devices, and home appliances. They also provide products and services related to information technology.

    Content

    This dataset contains 3 files with the daily stock price and volume of the three companies: Google, Apple, and Facebook from 07/09/2017 to 07/09/2022. Source: Yahoo! Finance

    Profile

    Apple

    Apple Inc. (AAPL) One Apple Park Way Cupertino, CA 95014 United States 408 996 1010 https://www.apple.com

    Sector(s): Technology Industry: Consumer Electronics Full Time Employees: 154,000

    Total Revenue (2021): $365,817,000
    Net Income (2021):$94,680,000
    Exchange: Nasdaq

    Google

    Alphabet Inc. (GOOG) 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway Mountain View, CA 94043 United States 650 253 0000 https://www.abc.xyz

    Sector(s): Communication Services Industry: Internet Content & Information Full Time Employees: 174,014

    Total Revenue (2021): $257,637,000 Net Income (2021):$76,033,000 Exchange: Nasdaq

    Facebook

    Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) 1601 Willow Road Menlo Park, CA 94025 United States 650 543 4800 https://investor.fb.com

    Sector(s): Communication Services Industry: Internet Content & Information Full Time Employees: 83,553

    Total Revenue (2021): $117,929,000 Net Income (2021):$39,370,000 Exchange: Nasdaq

    Acknowledgements

    Yahoo! Finance Investopedia Nasdaq

    Start A New Notebook!

  12. Apple iPhone sales revenue 2007-2025

    • statista.com
    Updated Jun 23, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2025). Apple iPhone sales revenue 2007-2025 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/263402/apples-iphone-revenue-since-3rd-quarter-2007/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 23, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Area covered
    Worldwide
    Description

    In the first quarter of its 2025 fiscal year, Apple generated around ** billion U.S. dollars in revenue from the sales of iPhones. Apple iPhone revenue The Apple iPhone is one of the biggest success stories in the smartphone industry. Since its introduction to the market in 2007, Apple has sold more than *** billion units worldwide. As of the third quarter of 2024, the Apple iPhone’s market share of new smartphone sales was over ** percent. Much of its accomplishments can be attributed to Apple’s ability to keep the product competitive throughout the years, with new releases and updates. Apple iPhone growth The iPhone has shown to be a crucial product for Apple, considering that the iPhone’s share of the company’s total revenue has consistently grown over the years. In the first quarter of 2009, the iPhone sales were responsible for about ********* of Apple’s revenue. In the third quarter of FY 2024, this figure reached a high of roughly ** percent, equating to less than ** billion U.S. dollars in that quarter. In terms of units sold, Apple went from around **** million units in 2010 to about *** million in 2023, but registered a peak in the fourth quarter of 2020 with more than ** million iPhones sold worldwide.

  13. Summary statistics for GPS quality metrics and incidence of outliers by...

    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Jan 30, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Sarah M. Kwiatek; Liang Cai; Kathleen A. Cagney; William E. Copeland; V. Joseph Hotz; Rick H. Hoyle (2024). Summary statistics for GPS quality metrics and incidence of outliers by participants’ residential and activity space locations. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0297492.t002
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jan 30, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    PLOShttp://plos.org/
    Authors
    Sarah M. Kwiatek; Liang Cai; Kathleen A. Cagney; William E. Copeland; V. Joseph Hotz; Rick H. Hoyle
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Summary statistics for GPS quality metrics and incidence of outliers by participants’ residential and activity space locations.

  14. Global smartphone unit shipments of Samsung 2010-2024, by quarter

    • statista.com
    Updated Jul 1, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2025). Global smartphone unit shipments of Samsung 2010-2024, by quarter [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/299144/samsung-smartphone-shipments-worldwide/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 1, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Area covered
    Worldwide
    Description

    In the fourth quarter of 2024, Samsung shipped around ** million smartphones, a decrease from the both the previous quarter and the same quarter of the previous year. Samsung’s sales consistently place the smartphone giant among the top three smartphone vendors in the world, alongside Xiaomi and Apple. Samsung smartphone sales – how many phones does Samsung sell? Global smartphone sales reached over *** billion units during 2024. While the global smartphone market is led by Samsung and Apple, Xiaomi has gained ground following the decline of Huawei. Together, these three companies hold more than ** percent of the global smartphone market share.

  15. Number of smartphone users in the Philippines 2014-2029

    • statista.com
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista Research Department, Number of smartphone users in the Philippines 2014-2029 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/topics/8230/smartphones-market-in-the-philippines/
    Explore at:
    Dataset provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Authors
    Statista Research Department
    Area covered
    Philippines
    Description

    The number of smartphone users in the Philippines was forecast to increase between 2024 and 2029 by in total 5.6 million users (+7.29 percent). This overall increase does not happen continuously, notably not in 2026, 2027, 2028 and 2029. The smartphone user base is estimated to amount to 82.33 million users in 2029. Smartphone users here are limited to internet users of any age using a smartphone. The shown figures have been derived from survey data that has been processed to estimate missing demographics.The shown data are an excerpt of Statista's Key Market Indicators (KMI). The KMI are a collection of primary and secondary indicators on the macro-economic, demographic and technological environment in up to 150 countries and regions worldwide. All indicators are sourced from international and national statistical offices, trade associations and the trade press and they are processed to generate comparable data sets (see supplementary notes under details for more information).Find more key insights for the number of smartphone users in countries like Thailand and Indonesia.

  16. Penetration rate of smartphones in the Philippines 2014-2029

    • statista.com
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista Research Department, Penetration rate of smartphones in the Philippines 2014-2029 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/topics/8230/smartphones-market-in-the-philippines/
    Explore at:
    Dataset provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Authors
    Statista Research Department
    Area covered
    Philippines
    Description

    The smartphone penetration in the Philippines was forecast to continuously decrease between 2024 and 2029 by in total 6.4 percentage points. According to this forecast, in 2029, the penetration will have decreased for the fourth consecutive year to 65.75 percent. The penetration rate refers to the share of the total population.The shown data are an excerpt of Statista's Key Market Indicators (KMI). The KMI are a collection of primary and secondary indicators on the macro-economic, demographic and technological environment in up to 150 countries and regions worldwide. All indicators are sourced from international and national statistical offices, trade associations and the trade press and they are processed to generate comparable data sets (see supplementary notes under details for more information).Find more key insights for the smartphone penetration in countries like Laos and Malaysia.

  17. Not seeing a result you expected?
    Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Business of Apps (2025). Apple Statistics (2025) [Dataset]. https://www.businessofapps.com/data/apple-statistics/

Apple Statistics (2025)

Explore at:
49 scholarly articles cite this dataset (View in Google Scholar)
Dataset updated
Jul 20, 2025
Dataset authored and provided by
Business of Apps
License

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
License information was derived automatically

Description

Apple is one of the most influential and recognisable brands in the world, responsible for the rise of the smartphone with the iPhone. Valued at over $2 trillion in 2021, it is also the most valuable...

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu