Update May 2024: Fixed a data type issue with "id" column that prevented twitter ids from rendering correctly.

Recent progress in generative artificial intelligence (gen-AI) has enabled the generation of photo-realistic and artistically-inspiring photos at a single click, catering to millions of users online. To explore how people use gen-AI models such as DALLE and StableDiffusion, it is critical to understand the themes, contents, and variations present in the AI-generated photos. In this work, we introduce TWIGMA (TWItter Generative-ai images with MetadatA), a comprehensive dataset encompassing 800,000 gen-AI images collected from Jan 2021 to March 2023 on Twitter, with associated metadata (e.g., tweet text, creation date, number of likes).

Through a comparative analysis of TWIGMA with natural images and human artwork, we find that gen-AI images possess distinctive characteristics and exhibit, on average, lower variability when compared to their non-gen-AI counterparts. Additionally, we find that the similarity between a gen-AI image and human images (i) is correlated with the number of likes; and (ii) can be used to identify human images that served as inspiration for the gen-AI creations. Finally, we observe a longitudinal shift in the themes of AI-generated images on Twitter, with users increasingly sharing artistically sophisticated content such as intricate human portraits, whereas their interest in simple subjects such as natural scenes and animals has decreased. Our analyses and findings underscore the significance of TWIGMA as a unique data resource for studying AI-generated images.

Note that in accordance with the privacy and control policy of Twitter, NO raw content from Twitter is included in this dataset and users could and need to retrieve the original Twitter content used for analysis using the Twitter id. In addition, users who want to access Twitter data should consult and follow rules and regulations closely at the official Twitter developer policy at https://developer.twitter.com/en/developer-terms/policy.

The Polish Open-Ended Question Answering Dataset is a meticulously curated collection of comprehensive Question-Answer pairs. It serves as a valuable resource for training Large Language Models (LLMs) and Question-answering models in the Polish language, advancing the field of artificial intelligence.

Dataset Content:

This QA dataset comprises a diverse set of open-ended questions paired with corresponding answers in Polish. There is no context paragraph given to choose an answer from, and each question is answered without any predefined context content. The questions cover a broad range of topics, including science, history, technology, geography, literature, current affairs, and more.

Each question is accompanied by an answer, providing valuable information and insights to enhance the language model training process. Both the questions and answers were manually curated by native Polish people, and references were taken from diverse sources like books, news articles, websites, and other reliable references.

This question-answer prompt completion dataset contains different types of prompts, including instruction type, continuation type, and in-context learning (zero-shot, few-shot) type. The dataset also contains questions and answers with different types of rich text, including tables, code, JSON, etc., with proper markdown.

Question Diversity:

To ensure diversity, this Q&A dataset includes questions with varying complexity levels, ranging from easy to medium and hard. Different types of questions, such as multiple-choice, direct, and true/false, are included. Additionally, questions are further classified into fact-based and opinion-based categories, creating a comprehensive variety. The QA dataset also contains the question with constraints and persona restrictions, which makes it even more useful for LLM training.

Answer Formats:

To accommodate varied learning experiences, the dataset incorporates different types of answer formats. These formats include single-word, short phrases, single sentences, and paragraph types of answers. The answer contains text strings, numerical values, date and time formats as well. Such diversity strengthens the Language model's ability to generate coherent and contextually appropriate answers.

Data Format and Annotation Details:

This fully labeled Polish Open Ended Question Answer Dataset is available in JSON and CSV formats. It includes annotation details such as id, language, domain, question_length, prompt_type, question_category, question_type, complexity, answer_type, rich_text.

Quality and Accuracy:

The dataset upholds the highest standards of quality and accuracy. Each question undergoes careful validation, and the corresponding answers are thoroughly verified. To prioritize inclusivity, the dataset incorporates questions and answers representing diverse perspectives and writing styles, ensuring it remains unbiased and avoids perpetuating discrimination.

Both the question and answers in Polish are grammatically accurate without any word or grammatical errors. No copyrighted, toxic, or harmful content is used while building this dataset.

Continuous Updates and Customization:

The entire dataset was prepared with the assistance of human curators from the FutureBeeAI crowd community. Continuous efforts are made to add more assets to this dataset, ensuring its growth and relevance. Additionally, FutureBeeAI offers the ability to collect custom question-answer data tailored to specific needs, providing flexibility and customization options.

License:

The dataset, created by FutureBeeAI, is now ready for commercial use. Researchers, data scientists, and developers can utilize this fully labeled and ready-to-deploy Polish Open Ended Question Answer Dataset to enhance the language understanding capabilities of their generative ai models, improve response generation, and explore new approaches to NLP question-answering tasks.

Context

All the images of faces here are generated using https://thispersondoesnotexist.com/

https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/kaggle-user-content/o/inbox%2F1842206%2F4c3d3569f4f9c12fc898d76390f68dab%2FBeFunky-collage.jpg?generation=1662079836729388&alt=media" alt="">

Copyrighting of AI Generated images

Under US copyright law, these images are technically not subject to copyright protection. Only "original works of authorship" are considered. "To qualify as a work of 'authorship' a work must be created by a human being," according to a US Copyright Office's report [PDF].

https://www.theregister.com/2022/08/14/ai_digital_artwork_copyright/

Tagging

I manually tagged all images as best as I could and separated them between the two classes below

• Female- 3860 images
• Male- 3013 images

Some may pass either female or male, but I will leave it to you to do the reviewing. I included toddlers and babies under Male/ Female

How it works

Each of the faces are totally fake, created using an algorithm called Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs).

A generative adversarial network (GAN) is a class of machine learning frameworks designed by Ian Goodfellow and his colleagues in June 2014. Two neural networks contest with each other in a game (in the form of a zero-sum game, where one agent's gain is another agent's loss).

Given a training set, this technique learns to generate new data with the same statistics as the training set. For example, a GAN trained on photographs can generate new photographs that look at least superficially authentic to human observers, having many realistic characteristics. Though originally proposed as a form of generative model for unsupervised learning, GANs have also proved useful for semi-supervised learning, fully supervised learning,and reinforcement learning.

• https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u8qPvzk0AfY
• https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dCKbRCUyop8
• https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SWoravHhsUU

Github implementation of website

• https://github.com/NVlabs/stylegan2
• https://github.com/lucidrains/stylegan2-pytorch
• https://github.com/lucidrains/lightweight-gan

How I gathered the images

Just a simple Jupyter notebook that looped and invoked the website https://thispersondoesnotexist.com/ , saving all images locally

AI in Consumer Decision-Making: Global Zero-Party Dataset

This dataset captures how consumers around the world are using AI tools like ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, and Copilot to guide their purchase decisions. It spans multiple product categories, demographics, and geographies, mapping the emerging role of AI as a decision-making companion across the consumer journey.

What Makes This Dataset Unique

Unlike datasets inferred from digital traces or modeled from third-party assumptions, this collection is built entirely on zero-party data: direct responses from consumers who voluntarily share their habits and preferences. That means the insights come straight from the people making the purchases, ensuring unmatched accuracy and relevance.

For FMCG leaders, retailers, and financial services strategists, this dataset provides the missing piece: visibility into how often consumers are letting AI shape their decisions, and where that influence is strongest.

Dataset Structure

Each record is enriched with: Product Category – from high-consideration items like electronics to daily staples such as groceries and snacks. AI Tool Used – identifying whether consumers turn to ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, or Copilot. Influence Level – the percentage of consumers in a given context who rely on AI to guide their choices. Demographics – generational breakdowns from Gen Z through Boomers. Geographic Detail – city- and country-level coverage across Africa, LATAM, Asia, Europe, and North America.

This structure allows filtering and comparison across categories, age groups, and markets, giving users a multidimensional view of AI’s impact on purchasing.

Why It Matters

AI has become a trusted voice in consumers’ daily lives. From meal planning to product comparisons, many people now consult AI before making a purchase—often without realizing how much it shapes the options they consider. For brands, this means that the path to purchase increasingly runs through an AI filter.

This dataset provides a comprehensive view of that hidden step in the consumer journey, enabling decision-makers to quantify: How much AI shapes consumer thinking before they even reach the shelf or checkout. Which product categories are most influenced by AI consultation. How adoption varies by geography and generation. Which AI platforms are most commonly trusted by consumers.

Opportunities for Business Leaders

FMCG & Retail Brands: Understand where AI-driven decision-making is already reshaping category competition. Marketers: Identify demographic segments most likely to consult AI, enabling targeted strategies. Retailers: Align assortments and promotions with the purchase patterns influenced by AI queries. Investors & Innovators: Gauge market readiness for AI-integrated commerce solutions.

The dataset doesn’t just describe what’s happening—it opens doors to the “so what” questions that define strategy. Which categories are becoming algorithm-driven? Which markets are shifting fastest? Where is the opportunity to get ahead of competitors in an AI-shaped funnel?

Why Now

Consumer AI adoption is no longer a forecast; it is a daily behavior. Just as search engines once rewrote the rules of marketing, conversational AI is quietly rewriting how consumers decide what to buy. This dataset offers an early, detailed view into that change, giving brands the ability to act while competitors are still guessing.

What You Get

Users gain: A global, city-level view of AI adoption in consumer decision-making. Cross-category comparability to see where AI influence is strongest and weakest. Generational breakdowns that show how adoption differs between younger and older cohorts. AI platform analysis, highlighting how tool preferences vary by region and category. Every row is powered by zero-party input, ensuring the insights reflect actual consumer behavior—not modeled assumptions.

How It’s Used

Leverage this data to:

Validate strategies before entering new markets or categories. Benchmark competitors on AI readiness and influence. Identify growth opportunities in categories where AI-driven recommendations are rapidly shaping decisions. Anticipate risks where brand visibility could be disrupted by algorithmic mediation.

Core Insights

The full dataset reveals: Surprising adoption curves across categories where AI wasn’t expected to play a role. Geographic pockets where AI has already become a standard step in purchase decisions. Demographic contrasts showing who trusts AI most—and where skepticism still holds. Clear differences between AI platforms and the consumer profiles most drawn to each.

These patterns are not visible in traditional retail data, sales reports, or survey summaries. They are only captured here, directly from the consumers themselves.

Summary

Winning in FMCG and retail today means more than getting on shelves, capturing price points, or running promotions. It means understanding the invisible algorithms consumers are ...

EnronSR, is a benchmark dataset based on the Enron email corpus that contains both naturally occurring human- and AI-generated email replies for the same set of messages. This resource enables the public benchmarking of novel language-generation models and facilitates a comparison against the strong, production-level baseline of Google Smart Reply used by millions of people.

Business's use of Generative AI, by North American Industry Classification System (NAICS), business employment size, type of business, business activity and majority ownership, first quarter of 2024.

The Japanese Closed-Ended Question Answering Dataset is a meticulously curated collection of 5000 comprehensive Question-Answer pairs. It serves as a valuable resource for training Large Language Models (LLMs) and question-answering models in the Japanese language, advancing the field of artificial intelligence.

Dataset Content

This closed-ended QA dataset comprises a diverse set of context paragraphs and questions paired with corresponding answers in Japanese. There is a context paragraph given for each question to get the answer from. The questions cover a broad range of topics, including science, history, technology, geography, literature, current affairs, and more.

Each question is accompanied by an answer, providing valuable information and insights to enhance the language model training process. Both the questions and answers were manually curated by native Japanese people, and references were taken from diverse sources like books, news articles, websites, web forums, and other reliable references.

This question-answer prompt completion dataset contains different types of prompts, including instruction type, continuation type, and in-context learning (zero-shot, few-shot) type. The dataset also contains questions and answers with different types of rich text, including tables, code, JSON, etc., with proper markdown.

Question Diversity

To ensure diversity, this Q&A dataset includes questions with varying complexity levels, ranging from easy to medium and hard. Different types of questions, such as multiple-choice, direct, and true/false, are included. The QA dataset also contains questions with constraints, which makes it even more useful for LLM training.

Answer Formats

To accommodate varied learning experiences, the dataset incorporates different types of answer formats. These formats include single-word, short phrases, single sentences, and paragraphs types of answers. The answers contain text strings, numerical values, date and time formats as well. Such diversity strengthens the language model's ability to generate coherent and contextually appropriate answers.

Data Format and Annotation Details

This fully labeled Japanese Closed-Ended Question Answer Dataset is available in JSON and CSV formats. It includes annotation details such as a unique id, context paragraph, context reference link, question, question type, question complexity, question category, domain, prompt type, answer, answer type, and rich text presence.

Quality and Accuracy

The dataset upholds the highest standards of quality and accuracy. Each question undergoes careful validation, and the corresponding answers are thoroughly verified. To prioritize inclusivity, the dataset incorporates questions and answers representing diverse perspectives and writing styles, ensuring it remains unbiased and avoids perpetuating discrimination.

The Japanese versions is grammatically accurate without any spelling or grammatical errors. No toxic or harmful content is used while building this dataset.

Continuous Updates and Customization

The entire dataset was prepared with the assistance of human curators from the FutureBeeAI crowd community. Continuous efforts are made to add more assets to this dataset, ensuring its growth and relevance. Additionally, FutureBeeAI offers the ability to collect custom question-answer data tailored to specific needs, providing flexibility and customization options.

License:

The dataset, created by FutureBeeAI, is now ready for commercial use. Researchers, data scientists, and developers can utilize this fully labeled and ready-to-deploy Japanese Closed-Ended Question Answer Dataset to enhance the language understanding capabilities of their generative AI models, improve response generation, and explore new approaches to NLP question-answering tasks.

This dataset originates from a series of experimental studies titled “Tough on People, Tolerant to AI? Differential Effects of Human vs. AI Unfairness on Trust” The project investigates how individuals respond to unfair behavior (distributive, procedural, and interactional unfairness) enacted by artificial intelligence versus human agents, and how such behavior affects cognitive and affective trust.1 Experiment 1a: The Impact of AI vs. Human Distributive Unfairness on TrustOverview: This dataset comes from an experimental study aimed at examining how individuals respond in terms of cognitive and affective trust when distributive unfairness is enacted by either an artificial intelligence (AI) agent or a human decision-maker. Experiment 1a specifically focuses on the main effect of the “type of decision-maker” on trust.Data Generation and Processing: The data were collected through Credamo, an online survey platform. Initially, 98 responses were gathered from students at a university in China. Additional student participants were recruited via Credamo to supplement the sample. Attention check items were embedded in the questionnaire, and participants who failed were automatically excluded in real-time. Data collection continued until 202 valid responses were obtained. SPSS software was used for data cleaning and analysis.Data Structure and Format: The data file is named “Experiment1a.sav” and is in SPSS format. It contains 28 columns and 202 rows, where each row corresponds to one participant. Columns represent measured variables, including: grouping and randomization variables, one manipulation check item, four items measuring distributive fairness perception, six items on cognitive trust, five items on affective trust, three items for honesty checks, and four demographic variables (gender, age, education, and grade level). The final three columns contain computed means for distributive fairness, cognitive trust, and affective trust.Additional Information: No missing data are present. All variable names are labeled in English abbreviations to facilitate further analysis. The dataset can be directly opened in SPSS or exported to other formats.2 Experiment 1b: The Mediating Role of Perceived Ability and Benevolence (Distributive Unfairness)Overview: This dataset originates from an experimental study designed to replicate the findings of Experiment 1a and further examine the potential mediating role of perceived ability and perceived benevolence.Data Generation and Processing: Participants were recruited via the Credamo online platform. Attention check items were embedded in the survey to ensure data quality. Data were collected using a rolling recruitment method, with invalid responses removed in real time. A total of 228 valid responses were obtained.Data Structure and Format: The dataset is stored in a file named Experiment1b.sav in SPSS format and can be directly opened in SPSS software. It consists of 228 rows and 40 columns. Each row represents one participant’s data record, and each column corresponds to a different measured variable. Specifically, the dataset includes: random assignment and grouping variables; one manipulation check item; four items measuring perceived distributive fairness; six items on perceived ability; five items on perceived benevolence; six items on cognitive trust; five items on affective trust; three items for attention check; and three demographic variables (gender, age, and education). The last five columns contain the computed mean scores for perceived distributive fairness, ability, benevolence, cognitive trust, and affective trust.Additional Notes: There are no missing values in the dataset. All variables are labeled using standardized English abbreviations to facilitate reuse and secondary analysis. The file can be analyzed directly in SPSS or exported to other formats as needed.3 Experiment 2a: Differential Effects of AI vs. Human Procedural Unfairness on TrustOverview: This dataset originates from an experimental study aimed at examining whether individuals respond differently in terms of cognitive and affective trust when procedural unfairness is enacted by artificial intelligence versus human decision-makers. Experiment 2a focuses on the main effect of the decision agent on trust outcomes.Data Generation and Processing: Participants were recruited via the Credamo online survey platform from two universities located in different regions of China. A total of 227 responses were collected. After excluding those who failed the attention check items, 204 valid responses were retained for analysis. Data were processed and analyzed using SPSS software.Data Structure and Format: The dataset is stored in a file named Experiment2a.sav in SPSS format and can be directly opened in SPSS software. It contains 204 rows and 30 columns. Each row represents one participant’s response record, while each column corresponds to a specific variable. Variables include: random assignment and grouping; one manipulation check item; seven items measuring perceived procedural fairness; six items on cognitive trust; five items on affective trust; three attention check items; and three demographic variables (gender, age, and education). The final three columns contain computed average scores for procedural fairness, cognitive trust, and affective trust.Additional Notes: The dataset contains no missing values. All variables are labeled using standardized English abbreviations to facilitate reuse and secondary analysis. The file can be directly analyzed in SPSS or exported to other formats as needed.4 Experiment 2b: Mediating Role of Perceived Ability and Benevolence (Procedural Unfairness)Overview: This dataset comes from an experimental study designed to replicate the findings of Experiment 2a and to further examine the potential mediating roles of perceived ability and perceived benevolence in shaping trust responses under procedural unfairness.Data Generation and Processing: Participants were working adults recruited through the Credamo online platform. A rolling data collection strategy was used, where responses failing attention checks were excluded in real time. The final dataset includes 235 valid responses. All data were processed and analyzed using SPSS software.Data Structure and Format: The dataset is stored in a file named Experiment2b.sav, which is in SPSS format and can be directly opened using SPSS software. It contains 235 rows and 43 columns. Each row corresponds to a single participant, and each column represents a specific measured variable. These include: random assignment and group labels; one manipulation check item; seven items measuring procedural fairness; six items for perceived ability; five items for perceived benevolence; six items for cognitive trust; five items for affective trust; three attention check items; and three demographic variables (gender, age, education). The final five columns contain the computed average scores for procedural fairness, perceived ability, perceived benevolence, cognitive trust, and affective trust.Additional Notes: There are no missing values in the dataset. All variables are labeled using standardized English abbreviations to support future reuse and secondary analysis. The dataset can be directly analyzed in SPSS and easily converted into other formats if needed.5 Experiment 3a: Effects of AI vs. Human Interactional Unfairness on TrustOverview: This dataset comes from an experimental study that investigates how interactional unfairness, when enacted by either artificial intelligence or human decision-makers, influences individuals’ cognitive and affective trust. Experiment 3a focuses on the main effect of the “decision-maker type” under interactional unfairness conditions.Data Generation and Processing: Participants were college students recruited from two universities in different regions of China through the Credamo survey platform. After excluding responses that failed attention checks, a total of 203 valid cases were retained from an initial pool of 223 responses. All data were processed and analyzed using SPSS software.Data Structure and Format: The dataset is stored in the file named Experiment3a.sav, in SPSS format and compatible with SPSS software. It contains 203 rows and 27 columns. Each row represents a single participant, while each column corresponds to a specific measured variable. These include: random assignment and condition labels; one manipulation check item; four items measuring interactional fairness perception; six items for cognitive trust; five items for affective trust; three attention check items; and three demographic variables (gender, age, education). The final three columns contain computed average scores for interactional fairness, cognitive trust, and affective trust.Additional Notes: There are no missing values in the dataset. All variable names are provided using standardized English abbreviations to facilitate secondary analysis. The data can be directly analyzed using SPSS and exported to other formats as needed.6 Experiment 3b: The Mediating Role of Perceived Ability and Benevolence (Interactional Unfairness)Overview: This dataset comes from an experimental study designed to replicate the findings of Experiment 3a and further examine the potential mediating roles of perceived ability and perceived benevolence under conditions of interactional unfairness.Data Generation and Processing: Participants were working adults recruited via the Credamo platform. Attention check questions were embedded in the survey, and responses that failed these checks were excluded in real time. Data collection proceeded in a rolling manner until a total of 227 valid responses were obtained. All data were processed and analyzed using SPSS software.Data Structure and Format: The dataset is stored in the file named Experiment3b.sav, in SPSS format and compatible with SPSS software. It includes 227 rows and

What’s Included

Welcome to the Russian Chain of Thought prompt-response dataset, a meticulously curated collection containing 3000 comprehensive prompt and response pairs. This dataset is an invaluable resource for training Language Models (LMs) to generate well-reasoned answers and minimize inaccuracies. Its primary utility lies in enhancing LLMs' reasoning skills for solving arithmetic, common sense, symbolic reasoning, and complex problems.

This COT dataset comprises a diverse set of instructions and questions paired with corresponding answers and rationales in the Russian language. These prompts and completions cover a broad range of topics and questions, including mathematical concepts, common sense reasoning, complex problem-solving, scientific inquiries, puzzles, and more.

Each prompt is meticulously accompanied by a response and rationale, providing essential information and insights to enhance the language model training process. These prompts, completions, and rationales were manually curated by native Russian people, drawing references from various sources, including open-source datasets, news articles, websites, and other reliable references.

Our chain-of-thought prompt-completion dataset includes various prompt types, such as instructional prompts, continuations, and in-context learning (zero-shot, few-shot) prompts. Additionally, the dataset contains prompts and completions enriched with various forms of rich text, such as lists, tables, code snippets, JSON, and more, with proper markdown format.

To ensure a wide-ranging dataset, we have included prompts from a plethora of topics related to mathematics, common sense reasoning, and symbolic reasoning. These topics encompass arithmetic, percentages, ratios, geometry, analogies, spatial reasoning, temporal reasoning, logic puzzles, patterns, and sequences, among others.

These prompts vary in complexity, spanning easy, medium, and hard levels. Various question types are included, such as multiple-choice, direct queries, and true/false assessments.

To accommodate diverse learning experiences, our dataset incorporates different types of answers depending on the prompt and provides step-by-step rationales. The detailed rationale aids the language model in building reasoning process for complex questions.

These responses encompass text strings, numerical values, and date and time formats, enhancing the language model's ability to generate reliable, coherent, and contextually appropriate answers.

This fully labeled Russian Chain of Thought Prompt Completion Dataset is available in JSON and CSV formats. It includes annotation details such as a unique ID, prompt, prompt type, prompt complexity, prompt category, domain, response, rationale, response type, and rich text presence.

Our dataset upholds the highest standards of quality and accuracy. Each prompt undergoes meticulous validation, and the corresponding responses and rationales are thoroughly verified. We prioritize inclusivity, ensuring that the dataset incorporates prompts and completions representing diverse perspectives and writing styles, maintaining an unbiased and discrimination-free stance.

The Russian version is grammatically accurate without any spelling or grammatical errors. No copyrighted, toxic, or harmful content is used during the construction of this dataset.

The entire dataset was prepared with the assistance of human curators from the FutureBeeAI crowd community. Ongoing efforts are made to add more assets to this dataset, ensuring its growth and relevance. Additionally, FutureBeeAI offers the ability to gather custom chain of thought prompt completion data tailored to specific needs, providing flexibility and customization options.

The dataset, created by FutureBeeAI, is now available for commercial use. Researchers, data scientists, and developers can leverage this fully labeled and ready-to-deploy Russian Chain of Thought Prompt Completion Dataset to enhance the rationale and accurate response generation capabilities of their generative AI models and explore new approaches to NLP tasks.

📚 GenAI-Ready Textbook Dataset for RAG Applications

This dataset is a curated collection of sample textbook excerpts across diverse academic domains such as Physics, Biology, and Political Science, specifically prepared for Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) scenarios and GenAI applications.

Designed as part of the Google Capstone Project titled Learn-Lynx: A Fun and Interactive GenAI-Powered Study Partner/Tutor for Students, this dataset serves as a reliable and versatile knowledge base to power student-facing AI tools. The Learn-Lynx agent suite focuses on intelligent summarization, explanation, and question generation for academic support.

🔍 Key Features

• Textbook-Grade Content: Sourced from open-access academic material, covering key high-school and introductory college-level concepts.
• Cleaned for Precision: All index and appendix pages have been removed, ensuring that the vector embeddings generated are topic-specific and semantically meaningful—ideal for relevant and accurate response generation in downstream tasks.
• RAG-Optimized: The dataset is tailored for RAG pipelines, making it an excellent resource for testing GenAI applications involving:
  • Document chunk retrieval
  • Grounded answer generation
  • Context-aware tutoring agents

🎯 Ideal Use Cases

• 📎 Retrieval-Augmented Question Answering
• 💡 AI Tutoring Systems
• 🧠 Knowledge Retrieval Benchmarks
• 🧪 Testing RAG pipeline performance
• 🧾 Text Chunking & Embedding Exploration

📦 Dataset Format

• Structured text files, each representing a distinct subject/topic
• Cleaned and preprocessed to remove non-informative sections
• Ready to be used with popular vector DBs and embedding frameworks

🧑🏽‍💻 Authors

Built with learning and experimentation in mind by:

• Rohan Vailala Thoma : Kaggle-rohanthoma | LinkedIn

• Aditya Suryawanshi : Kaggle-adii14

• Harshitha : Kaggle-harsh1tha

Whether you're building a student-friendly AI tutor or testing out RAG workflows, this dataset provides a clean, curated, and context-rich foundation to kickstart your journey!

The German Open-Ended Question Answering Dataset is a meticulously curated collection of comprehensive Question-Answer pairs. It serves as a valuable resource for training Large Language Models (LLMs) and Question-answering models in the German language, advancing the field of artificial intelligence.

Dataset Content:

This QA dataset comprises a diverse set of open-ended questions paired with corresponding answers in German. There is no context paragraph given to choose an answer from, and each question is answered without any predefined context content. The questions cover a broad range of topics, including science, history, technology, geography, literature, current affairs, and more.

Each question is accompanied by an answer, providing valuable information and insights to enhance the language model training process. Both the questions and answers were manually curated by native German people, and references were taken from diverse sources like books, news articles, websites, and other reliable references.

This question-answer prompt completion dataset contains different types of prompts, including instruction type, continuation type, and in-context learning (zero-shot, few-shot) type. The dataset also contains questions and answers with different types of rich text, including tables, code, JSON, etc., with proper markdown.

Question Diversity:

To ensure diversity, this Q&A dataset includes questions with varying complexity levels, ranging from easy to medium and hard. Different types of questions, such as multiple-choice, direct, and true/false, are included. Additionally, questions are further classified into fact-based and opinion-based categories, creating a comprehensive variety. The QA dataset also contains the question with constraints and persona restrictions, which makes it even more useful for LLM training.

Answer Formats:

To accommodate varied learning experiences, the dataset incorporates different types of answer formats. These formats include single-word, short phrases, single sentences, and paragraph types of answers. The answer contains text strings, numerical values, date and time formats as well. Such diversity strengthens the Language model's ability to generate coherent and contextually appropriate answers.

Data Format and Annotation Details:

This fully labeled German Open Ended Question Answer Dataset is available in JSON and CSV formats. It includes annotation details such as id, language, domain, question_length, prompt_type, question_category, question_type, complexity, answer_type, rich_text.

Quality and Accuracy:

The dataset upholds the highest standards of quality and accuracy. Each question undergoes careful validation, and the corresponding answers are thoroughly verified. To prioritize inclusivity, the dataset incorporates questions and answers representing diverse perspectives and writing styles, ensuring it remains unbiased and avoids perpetuating discrimination.

Both the question and answers in German are grammatically accurate without any word or grammatical errors. No copyrighted, toxic, or harmful content is used while building this dataset.

Continuous Updates and Customization:

The entire dataset was prepared with the assistance of human curators from the FutureBeeAI crowd community. Continuous efforts are made to add more assets to this dataset, ensuring its growth and relevance. Additionally, FutureBeeAI offers the ability to collect custom question-answer data tailored to specific needs, providing flexibility and customization options.

License:

The dataset, created by FutureBeeAI, is now ready for commercial use. Researchers, data scientists, and developers can utilize this fully labeled and ready-to-deploy German Open Ended Question Answer Dataset to enhance the language understanding capabilities of their generative ai models, improve response generation, and explore new approaches to NLP question-answering tasks.

NeSy4VRD

NeSy4VRD is a multifaceted, multipurpose resource designed to foster neurosymbolic AI (NeSy) research, particularly NeSy research using Semantic Web technologies such as OWL ontologies, OWL-based knowledge graphs and OWL-based reasoning as symbolic components. The NeSy4VRD research resource pertains to the computer vision field of AI and, within that field, to the application tasks of visual relationship detection (VRD) and scene graph generation.

Whilst the core motivation of the NeSy4VRD research resource is to foster computer vision-based NeSy research using Semantic Web technologies such as OWL ontologies and OWL-based knowledge graphs, AI researchers can readily use NeSy4VRD to either: 1) pursue computer vision-based NeSy research without involving Semantic Web technologies as symbolic components, or 2) pursue computer vision research without NeSy (i.e. pursue research that focuses purely on deep learning alone, without involving symbolic components of any kind). This is the sense in which we describe NeSy4VRD as being multipurpose: it can readily be used by diverse groups of computer vision-based AI researchers with diverse interests and objectives.

The NeSy4VRD research resource in its entirety is distributed across two locations: Zenodo and GitHub.

NeSy4VRD on Zenodo: the NeSy4VRD dataset package

This entry on Zenodo hosts the NeSy4VRD dataset package, which includes the NeSy4VRD dataset and its companion NeSy4VRD ontology, an OWL ontology called VRD-World.

The NeSy4VRD dataset consists of an image dataset with associated visual relationship annotations. The images of the NeSy4VRD dataset are the same as those that were once publicly available as part of the VRD dataset. The NeSy4VRD visual relationship annotations are a highly customised and quality-improved version of the original VRD visual relationship annotations. The NeSy4VRD dataset is designed for computer vision-based research that involves detecting objects in images and predicting relationships between ordered pairs of those objects. A visual relationship for an image of the NeSy4VRD dataset has the form <'subject', 'predicate', 'object'>, where the 'subject' and 'object' are two objects in the image, and the 'predicate' describes some relation between them. Both the 'subject' and 'object' objects are specified in terms of bounding boxes and object classes. For example, representative annotated visual relationships are <'person', 'ride', 'horse'>, <'hat', 'on', 'teddy bear'> and <'cat', 'under', 'pillow'>.

Visual relationship detection is pursued as a computer vision application task in its own right, and as a building block capability for the broader application task of scene graph generation. Scene graph generation, in turn, is commonly used as a precursor to a variety of enriched, downstream visual understanding and reasoning application tasks, such as image captioning, visual question answering, image retrieval, image generation and multimedia event processing.

The NeSy4VRD ontology, VRD-World, is a rich, well-aligned, companion OWL ontology engineered specifically for use with the NeSy4VRD dataset. It directly describes the domain of the NeSy4VRD dataset, as reflected in the NeSy4VRD visual relationship annotations. More specifically, all of the object classes that feature in the NeSy4VRD visual relationship annotations have corresponding classes within the VRD-World OWL class hierarchy, and all of the predicates that feature in the NeSy4VRD visual relationship annotations have corresponding properties within the VRD-World OWL object property hierarchy. The rich structure of the VRD-World class hierarchy and the rich characteristics and relationships of the VRD-World object properties together give the VRD-World OWL ontology rich inference semantics. These provide ample opportunity for OWL reasoning to be meaningfully exercised and exploited in NeSy research that uses OWL ontologies and OWL-based knowledge graphs as symbolic components. There is also ample potential for NeSy researchers to explore supplementing the OWL reasoning capabilities afforded by the VRD-World ontology with Datalog rules and reasoning.

Use of the NeSy4VRD ontology, VRD-World, in conjunction with the NeSy4VRD dataset is, of course, purely optional, however. Computer vision AI researchers who have no interest in NeSy, or NeSy researchers who have no interest in OWL ontologies and OWL-based knowledge graphs, can ignore the NeSy4VRD ontology and use the NeSy4VRD dataset by itself.

All computer vision-based AI research user groups can, if they wish, also avail themselves of the other components of the NeSy4VRD research resource available on GitHub.

NeSy4VRD on GitHub: open source infrastructure supporting extensibility, and sample code

The NeSy4VRD research resource incorporates additional components that are companions to the NeSy4VRD dataset package here on Zenodo. These companion components are available at NeSy4VRD on GitHub. These companion components consist of:

• comprehensive open source Python-based infrastructure supporting the extensibility of the NeSy4VRD visual relationship annotations (and, thereby, the extensibility of the NeSy4VRD ontology, VRD-World, as well)
• open source Python sample code showing how one can work with the NeSy4VRD visual relationship annotations in conjunction with the NeSy4VRD ontology, VRD-World, and RDF knowledge graphs.

The NeSy4VRD infrastructure supporting extensibility consists of:

• open source Python code for conducting deep and comprehensive analyses of the NeSy4VRD dataset (the VRD images and their associated NeSy4VRD visual relationship annotations)
• an open source, custom-designed NeSy4VRD protocol for specifying visual relationship annotation customisation instructions declaratively, in text files
• an open source, custom-designed NeSy4VRD workflow, implemented using Python scripts and modules, for applying small or large volumes of customisations or extensions to the NeSy4VRD visual relationship annotations in a configurable, managed, automated and repeatable process.

The purpose behind providing comprehensive infrastructure to support extensibility of the NeSy4VRD visual relationship annotations is to make it easy for researchers to take the NeSy4VRD dataset in new directions, by further enriching the annotations, or by tailoring them to introduce new or more data conditions that better suit their particular research needs and interests. The option to use the NeSy4VRD extensibility infrastructure in this way applies equally well to each of the diverse potential NeSy4VRD user groups already mentioned.

The NeSy4VRD extensibility infrastructure, however, may be of particular interest to NeSy researchers interested in using the NeSy4VRD ontology, VRD-World, in conjunction with the NeSy4VRD dataset. These researchers can of course tailor the VRD-World ontology if they wish without needing to modify or extend the NeSy4VRD visual relationship annotations in any way. But their degrees of freedom for doing so will be limited by the need to maintain alignment with the NeSy4VRD visual relationship annotations and the particular set of object classes and predicates to which they refer. If NeSy researchers want full freedom to tailor the VRD-World ontology, they may well need to tailor the NeSy4VRD visual relationship annotations first, in order that alignment be maintained.

To illustrate our point, and to illustrate our vision of how the NeSy4VRD extensibility infrastructure can be used, let us consider a simple example. It is common in computer vision to distinguish between thing objects (that have well-defined shapes) and stuff objects (that are amorphous). Suppose a researcher wishes to have a greater number of stuff object classes with which to work. Water is such a stuff object. Many VRD images contain water but it is not currently one of the annotated object classes and hence is never referenced in any visual relationship annotations. So adding a Water class to the class hierarchy of the VRD-World ontology would be pointless because it would never acquire any instances (because an object detector would never detect any). However, our hypothetical researcher could choose to do the following:

• use the analysis functionality of the NeSy4VRD extensibility infrastructure to find images containing water (by, say, searching for images whose visual relationships refer to object classes such as 'boat', 'surfboard', 'sand', 'umbrella', etc.);
• use free image analysis software (such as GIMP, at gimp.org) to get bounding boxes for instances of water in these images;
• use the NeSy4VRD protocol to specify new visual relationships for these images that refer to the new 'water' objects (e.g. <'boat', 'on', 'water'>);
• use the NeSy4VRD workflow to introduce the new object class 'water' and to apply the specified new visual relationships to the sets of annotations for the affected images;
• introduce class Water to the class hierarchy of the VRD-World ontology (using, say, the free Protege ontology editor);
• continue experimenting, now with the added benefit of the additional stuff object class 'water';
• contribute the enriched set of NeSy4VRD visual relationship

Crowd Counting Dataset

The dataset includes images featuring crowds of people ranging from 0 to 5000 individuals. The dataset includes a diverse range of scenes and scenarios, capturing crowds in various settings. Each image in the dataset is accompanied by a corresponding JSON file containing detailed labeling information for each person in the crowd for crowd count and classification.

https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/kaggle-user-content/o/inbox%2F12421376%2F4b51a212e59f575bd6978f215a32aca0%2FFrame%2064.png?generation=1701336719197861&alt=media" alt="">

Types of crowds in the dataset: 0-1000, 1000-2000, 2000-3000, 3000-4000 and 4000-5000

https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/kaggle-user-content/o/inbox%2F12421376%2F72e0fed3ad13826d6545ff75a79ed9db%2FFrame%2065.png?generation=1701337622225724&alt=media" alt="">

This dataset provides a valuable resource for researchers and developers working on crowd counting technology, enabling them to train and evaluate their algorithms with a wide range of crowd sizes and scenarios. It can also be used for benchmarking and comparison of different crowd counting algorithms, as well as for real-world applications such as public safety and security, urban planning, and retail analytics.

Full version of the dataset includes 647 labeled images of crowds, leave a request on TrainingData to buy the dataset

Statistics for the dataset (number of images by the crowd's size and image width):

https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/kaggle-user-content/o/inbox%2F12421376%2F2e9f36820e62a2ef62586fc8e84387e2%2FFrame%2063.png?generation=1701336725293625&alt=media" alt="">

OTHER BIOMETRIC DATASETS:

• Anti Spoofing Real Dataset
• Antispoofing Replay Dataset
• Selfies, ID Images dataset (5591 sets of 15 files)
• Selfies and video dataset (4 052 sets)
• Dataset of bald people, 5000 images

Get the Dataset

This is just an example of the data

Leave a request on https://trainingdata.pro/datasets to learn about the price and buy the dataset

Content

• images - includes original images of crowds placed in subfolders according to its size,
• labels - includes json-files with labeling and visualised labeling for the images in the previous folder,
• csv file - includes information for each image in the dataset

File with the extension .csv

• id: id of the image,
• image: link to access the original image,
• label: link to access the json-file with labeling,
• type: type of the crowd on the photo

TrainingData provides high-quality data annotation tailored to your needs

keywords: crowd counting, crowd density estimation, people counting, crowd analysis, image annotation, computer vision, deep learning, object detection, object counting, image classification, dense regression, crowd behavior analysis, crowd tracking, head detection, crowd segmentation, crowd motion analysis, image processing, machine learning, artificial intelligence, ai, human detection, crowd sensing, image dataset, public safety, crowd management, urban planning, event planning, traffic management

DEEP-VOICE: Real-time Detection of AI-Generated Speech for DeepFake Voice Conversion

This dataset contains examples of real human speech, and DeepFake versions of those speeches by using Retrieval-based Voice Conversion.

Can machine learning be used to detect when speech is AI-generated?

Introduction

There are growing implications surrounding generative AI in the speech domain that enable voice cloning and real-time voice conversion from one individual to another. This technology poses a significant ethical threat and could lead to breaches of privacy and misrepresentation, thus there is an urgent need for real-time detection of AI-generated speech for DeepFake Voice Conversion.

To address the above emerging issues, we are introducing the DEEP-VOICE dataset. DEEP-VOICE is comprised of real human speech from eight well-known figures and their speech converted to one another using Retrieval-based Voice Conversion.

For each speech, the accompaniment ("background noise") was removed before conversion using RVC. The original accompaniment is then added back to the DeepFake speech:

https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/kaggle-user-content/o/inbox%2F2039603%2F921dc2241837cd784329955d570f7802%2Fdfcover.png?generation=1692897655324630&alt=media" alt="Overview of the Retrieval-based Voice Conversion process to generate DeepFake speech with Ryan Gosling's speech converted to Margot Robbie. Conversion is run on the extracted vocals before being layered on the original background ambience.">

(Above: Overview of the Retrieval-based Voice Conversion process to generate DeepFake speech with Ryan Gosling's speech converted to Margot Robbie. Conversion is run on the extracted vocals before being layered on the original background ambience.)

Dataset

There are two forms to the dataset that are made available.

First, the raw audio can be found in the "AUDIO" directory. They are arranged within "REAL" and "FAKE" class directories. The audio filenames note which speakers provided the real speech, and which voices they were converted to. For example "Obama-to-Biden" denotes that Barack Obama's speech has been converted to Joe Biden's voice.

Second, the extracted features can be found in the "DATASET-balanced.csv" file. This is the data that was used in the below study. The dataset has each feature extracted from one-second windows of audio and are balanced through random sampling.

**Note: ** All experimental data is found within the "KAGGLE" directory. The "DEMONSTRATION" directory is used for playing cropped and compressed demos in notebooks due to Kaggle's limitations on file size.

A potential use of a successful system could be used for the following:

https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/kaggle-user-content/o/inbox%2F2039603%2F7ae536243464f0dbb48f3566765f6b50%2Fdfcover.png?generation=1692897790677119&alt=media" alt="Usage of the real-time system. The end user is notified when the machine learning model has processed the speech audio (e.g. a phone or conference call) and predicted that audio chunks contain AI-generated speech.">

(Above: Usage of the real-time system. The end user is notified when the machine learning model has processed the speech audio (e.g. a phone or conference call) and predicted that audio chunks contain AI-generated speech.)

Papers with Code

The dataset and all studies using it are linked using Papers with Code

The Papers with Code page can be found by clicking here: Papers with Code

Attribution

This dataset was produced from the study "Real-time Detection of AI-Generated Speech for DeepFake Voice Conversion"

Bird, J.J. and Lotfi, A., 2023. Real-time Detection of AI-Generated Speech for DeepFake Voice Conversion. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.12734.

The preprint can be found on ArXiv by clicking here: Real-time Detection of AI-Generated Speech for DeepFake Voice Conversion

License

This dataset is provided under the MIT License:

Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:

The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software.

*THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT H...

Success.ai’s Commercial Real Estate Data and B2B Contact Data for Global Real Estate Professionals is a comprehensive dataset designed to connect businesses with industry leaders in real estate worldwide. With over 170M verified profiles, including work emails and direct phone numbers, this solution ensures precise outreach to agents, brokers, property developers, and key decision-makers in the real estate sector.

Utilizing advanced AI-driven validation, our data is continuously updated to maintain 99% accuracy, offering actionable insights that empower targeted marketing, streamlined sales strategies, and efficient recruitment efforts. Whether you’re engaging with top real estate executives or sourcing local property experts, Success.ai provides reliable and compliant data tailored to your needs.

Key Features of Success.ai’s Real Estate Professional Contact Data

• Comprehensive Industry Coverage Gain direct access to verified profiles of real estate professionals across the globe, including:

1. Real Estate Agents: Professionals facilitating property sales and purchases.
2. Brokers: Key intermediaries managing transactions between buyers and sellers.
3. Property Developers: Decision-makers shaping residential, commercial, and industrial projects.
4. Real Estate Executives: Leaders overseeing multi-regional operations and business strategies.
5. Architects & Consultants: Experts driving design and project feasibility.

• Verified and Continuously Updated Data

AI-Powered Validation: All profiles are verified using cutting-edge AI to ensure up-to-date accuracy. Real-Time Updates: Our database is refreshed continuously to reflect the most current information. Global Compliance: Fully aligned with GDPR, CCPA, and other regional regulations for ethical data use.

• Customizable Data Delivery Tailor your data access to align with your operational goals:

API Integration: Directly integrate data into your CRM or project management systems for seamless workflows. Custom Flat Files: Receive detailed datasets customized to your specifications, ready for immediate application.

Why Choose Success.ai for Real Estate Contact Data?

• Best Price Guarantee Enjoy competitive pricing that delivers exceptional value for verified, comprehensive contact data.

• Precision Targeting for Real Estate Professionals Our dataset equips you to connect directly with real estate decision-makers, minimizing misdirected efforts and improving ROI.

• Strategic Use Cases

  Lead Generation: Target qualified real estate agents and brokers to expand your network. Sales Outreach: Engage with property developers and executives to close high-value deals. Marketing Campaigns: Drive targeted campaigns tailored to real estate markets and demographics. Recruitment: Identify and attract top talent in real estate for your growing team. Market Research: Access firmographic and demographic data for in-depth industry analysis.

• Data Highlights 170M+ Verified Professional Profiles 50M Work Emails 30M Company Profiles 700M Global Professional Profiles

• Powerful APIs for Enhanced Functionality

  Enrichment API Ensure your contact database remains relevant and up-to-date with real-time enrichment. Ideal for businesses seeking to maintain competitive agility in dynamic markets.

Lead Generation API Boost your lead generation with verified contact details for real estate professionals, supporting up to 860,000 API calls per day for robust scalability.

• Use Cases for Real Estate Contact Data

1. Targeted Outreach for New Projects Connect with property developers and brokers to pitch your services or collaborate on upcoming projects.

2. Real Estate Marketing Campaigns Execute personalized marketing campaigns targeting agents and clients in residential, commercial, or industrial sectors.

3. Enhanced Sales Strategies Shorten sales cycles by directly engaging with decision-makers and key stakeholders.

4. Recruitment and Talent Acquisition Access profiles of highly skilled professionals to strengthen your real estate team.

5. Market Analysis and Intelligence Leverage firmographic and demographic insights to identify trends and optimize business strategies.

• What Makes Us Stand Out? >> Unmatched Data Accuracy: Our AI-driven validation ensures 99% accuracy for all contact details. >> Comprehensive Global Reach: Covering professionals across diverse real estate markets worldwide. >> Flexible Delivery Options: Access data in formats that seamlessly fit your existing systems. >> Ethical and Compliant Data Practices: Adherence to global standards for secure and responsible data use.

Success.ai’s B2B Contact Data for Global Real Estate Professionals delivers the tools you need to connect with the right people at the right time, driving efficiency and success in your business operations. From agents and brokers to property developers and executiv...

The study on the future of work was conducted by Kantar Public on behalf of the Press and Information Office of the Federal Government. During the survey period from 13 to 22 June 2023, German-speaking people aged 16 to 67 in Germany, excluding pensioners, were surveyed in online interviews (CAWI) on the following topics: current life and work situation, future expectations, the use of AI and the digitalization of the world of work as well as attitudes towards demographic change and the shortage of skilled workers. The respondents were selected using a quota sample from an online access panel. Future: general life satisfaction; satisfaction with selected aspects of life (working conditions, education, qualifications, health situation, professional remuneration, family situation, financial situation); expectations for the future: rather confident vs. rather worried about the private and professional future; rather confident vs. rather worried about the professional future of younger people or the next generation; rather confident vs. rather worried about the future of Germany; confidence vs. concern regarding the competitiveness of the German economy in various areas (digitalization and automation of the working world, climate protection goals of industry, effects of the Ukraine war on the German economy, access to important raw materials such as rare earths or metals, reliable supply of energy, number of qualified specialists, general price development, development of wages and salaries, development of pensions); probability of various future scenarios for Germany in 2030 (Germany is once again the world export champion, unemployment is at an all-time low - full employment prevails in Germany, the energy transition has already created hundreds of thousands of new jobs in German industry, Germany has emerged the strongest in the EU from the crises of the last 15 years, the price crisis has led to the fact The price crisis has meant that politics and business have successfully set the course for the future, citizens can deal with all official matters digitally from home, German industry is much faster than expected in terms of climate targets and is already almost climate-neutral, Germany is the most popular country of immigration for foreign university graduates, the nursing shortage in Germany has been overcome thanks to the immigration of skilled workers). 2. Importance of work: importance of different areas of life (ranking); work to earn money vs. as a vocation; importance of different work characteristics (e.g. job security, adequate income, development prospects and career opportunities, etc.). 3. Professional situation: satisfaction with various aspects of work (job security, pay/income, development/career opportunities, interesting work, sufficient contact with other people, compatibility of family/private life and work. Work climate/ working atmosphere, further training opportunities, social recognition, meaningful and useful work); job satisfaction; expected development of working conditions in own professional field; recognition for own work from the company/ employer, from colleagues, from other people from the work context, from the personal private environment, from society in general and from politics; unemployed people were asked: currently looking for a new job; assessment of chances of finding a new job; pupils, students and trainees were asked: assessment of future career opportunities; reasons for assessing career opportunities as poor (open). 4. AI: use of artificial intelligence (AI) in the world of work rather as an opportunity or rather as a danger; expected effects of AI on working conditions in their own professional field (improvement, deterioration, no effects); opportunities and dangers of digitization, AI and automation based on comparisons (all in all, digitization leads to a greater burden on the environment, as computers, tablets, smartphones and data centers are major power guzzlers vs. All in all, digitalization protects the environment through less mobility and more efficient management, artificial intelligence and digitalization help to reduce the workload and relieve employees of repetitive and monotonous tasks vs. artificial intelligence and digitalization overburden many employees through further work intensification. Stress and burnouts will increasingly be the result, artificial intelligence and digitalization will primarily lead to job losses vs. artificial intelligence and digitalization will create more new, future-proof jobs than old ones will be lost, our economy will benefit greatly from global networking through speed and efficiency gains vs. our economy is threatened by global networking by becoming more susceptible to cyberattacks and hacker attacks, digitalization will lead to new, more flexible working time models and a better work-life balance vs. digitalization will lead to a blurring of boundaries between work and leisure time and thus, above all, to more self-exploitation by employees). 5. Home office: local focus of own work currently, before the corona pandemic and during the corona pandemic (exclusively/ predominantly in the company or from home, at changing work locations (company, at home, mobile from on the road); Agreement with various statements on the topic of working from home (wherever possible, employers should give their employees the opportunity to work from home, working from home leads to a loss of cohesion in the company, working from home enables a better work-life balance, digital communication makes coordination processes more complicated, home office makes an important contribution to climate protection due to fewer journeys to work, home office leads to a mixture of work and leisure time and thus to a greater workload, home office leads to greater job satisfaction and thus to higher productivity, since many professions cannot be carried out in the home office, it would be fairer if everyone had to work outside the home); attitude towards a general 4-day working week (A four-day week for everyone would increase the shortage of skilled workers vs. a four-day week for everyone would increase motivation and therefore productivity). 6. Demographic change: knowledge of the meaning of the term demographic change; expected impact of demographic change on the future of Germany; opinion on the future in Germany based on alternative future scenarios (in the future, poverty in old age will increase noticeably vs. the future generation of pensioners will be wealthier than ever before, in the future, politics and elections will be increasingly determined by older people vs. the influence of the younger generation on politics will become much more important, our social security systems will continue to ensure intergenerational fairness and equalization in the future vs. the distribution conflicts between the younger and older generations will increase noticeably, future generations will have to work longer due to the shortage of skilled workers vs. people will have to work less in the future due to digitalization and automation and will be able to retire earlier). 7. Shortage of skilled workers: shortage of skilled workers in own company; additional personal burden due to shortage of skilled workers; company is doing enough to counteract the shortage of skilled workers; use of artificial intelligence (AI) in the company could compensate for the shortage of skilled workers; evaluation of various measures taken by the federal government to combat the shortage of skilled workers (improvement of training and further education opportunities, increasing the participation of women in the labor market (e.g. by expanding childcare services, more flexible working hours, offers for older skilled workers to stay in work longer, facilitating the immigration of foreign skilled workers); evaluation of the work of the federal government to combat the shortage of skilled workers; attractiveness (reputation in society) of various professions with a shortage of skilled workers (e.g. social pedagogues/educators); evaluation of the work of the federal government to combat the shortage of skilled workers. B. social pedagogue, nursery school teacher, etc.); job recommendation for younger people; own activity in one of the professions mentioned with a shortage of skilled workers. Demography: sex; age; age in age groups; employment; federal state; region west/east; school education; vocational training; self-placement social class; employment status; occupation differentiated workers, employees, civil servants; industry; household size; number of children under 18 in the household; net household income (grouped); location size; party sympathy; migration background (respondent, one parent or both parents). Additionally coded were: consecutive interview number; school education head group (low, medium, high); weighting factor.

What’s Included

Welcome to the Urdu Extraction Type Prompt-Response Dataset, a meticulously curated collection of 1500 prompt and response pairs. This dataset is a valuable resource for enhancing the data extraction abilities of Language Models (LMs), a critical aspect in advancing generative AI.

This extraction dataset comprises a diverse set of prompts and responses where the prompt contains input text, extraction instruction, constraints, and restrictions while completion contains the most accurate extraction data for the given prompt. Both these prompts and completions are available in Urdu language.

These prompt and completion pairs cover a broad range of topics, including science, history, technology, geography, literature, current affairs, and more. Each prompt is accompanied by a response, providing valuable information and insights to enhance the language model training process. Both the prompt and response were manually curated by native Urdu people, and references were taken from diverse sources like books, news articles, websites, and other reliable references.

This dataset encompasses various prompt types, including instruction type, continuation type, and in-context learning (zero-shot, few-shot) type. Additionally, you'll find prompts and responses containing rich text elements, such as tables, code, JSON, etc., all in proper markdown format.

To ensure diversity, this extraction dataset includes prompts with varying complexity levels, ranging from easy to medium and hard. Additionally, prompts are diverse in terms of length from short to medium and long, creating a comprehensive variety. The extraction dataset also contains prompts with constraints and persona restrictions, which makes it even more useful for LLM training.

To accommodate diverse learning experiences, our dataset incorporates different types of responses depending on the prompt. These formats include single-word, short phrase, single sentence, and paragraph type of response. These responses encompass text strings, numerical values, and date and time, enhancing the language model's ability to generate reliable, coherent, and contextually appropriate answers.

This fully labeled Urdu Extraction Prompt Completion Dataset is available in JSON and CSV formats. It includes annotation details such as a unique ID, prompt, prompt type, prompt length, prompt complexity, domain, response, response type, and rich text presence.

Our dataset upholds the highest standards of quality and accuracy. Each prompt undergoes meticulous validation, and the corresponding responses are thoroughly verified. We prioritize inclusivity, ensuring that the dataset incorporates prompts and completions representing diverse perspectives and writing styles, maintaining an unbiased and discrimination-free stance.

The Urdu version is grammatically accurate without any spelling or grammatical errors. No copyrighted, toxic, or harmful content is used during the construction of this dataset.

The entire dataset was prepared with the assistance of human curators from the FutureBeeAI crowd community. Ongoing efforts are made to add more assets to this dataset, ensuring its growth and relevance. Additionally, FutureBeeAI offers the ability to gather custom extraction prompt and completion data tailored to specific needs, providing flexibility and customization options.

The dataset, created by FutureBeeAI, is now available for commercial use. Researchers, data scientists, and developers can leverage this fully labeled and ready-to-deploy Urdu Extraction Prompt-Completion Dataset to enhance the data extraction abilities and accurate response generation capabilities of their generative AI models and explore new approaches to NLP tasks.

What’s Included

Welcome to the Hindi Chain of Thought prompt-response dataset, a meticulously curated collection containing 3000 comprehensive prompt and response pairs. This dataset is an invaluable resource for training Language Models (LMs) to generate well-reasoned answers and minimize inaccuracies. Its primary utility lies in enhancing LLMs' reasoning skills for solving arithmetic, common sense, symbolic reasoning, and complex problems.

This COT dataset comprises a diverse set of instructions and questions paired with corresponding answers and rationales in the Hindi language. These prompts and completions cover a broad range of topics and questions, including mathematical concepts, common sense reasoning, complex problem-solving, scientific inquiries, puzzles, and more.

Each prompt is meticulously accompanied by a response and rationale, providing essential information and insights to enhance the language model training process. These prompts, completions, and rationales were manually curated by native Hindi people, drawing references from various sources, including open-source datasets, news articles, websites, and other reliable references.

Our chain-of-thought prompt-completion dataset includes various prompt types, such as instructional prompts, continuations, and in-context learning (zero-shot, few-shot) prompts. Additionally, the dataset contains prompts and completions enriched with various forms of rich text, such as lists, tables, code snippets, JSON, and more, with proper markdown format.

To ensure a wide-ranging dataset, we have included prompts from a plethora of topics related to mathematics, common sense reasoning, and symbolic reasoning. These topics encompass arithmetic, percentages, ratios, geometry, analogies, spatial reasoning, temporal reasoning, logic puzzles, patterns, and sequences, among others.

These prompts vary in complexity, spanning easy, medium, and hard levels. Various question types are included, such as multiple-choice, direct queries, and true/false assessments.

To accommodate diverse learning experiences, our dataset incorporates different types of answers depending on the prompt and provides step-by-step rationales. The detailed rationale aids the language model in building reasoning process for complex questions.

These responses encompass text strings, numerical values, and date and time formats, enhancing the language model's ability to generate reliable, coherent, and contextually appropriate answers.

This fully labeled Hindi Chain of Thought Prompt Completion Dataset is available in JSON and CSV formats. It includes annotation details such as a unique ID, prompt, prompt type, prompt complexity, prompt category, domain, response, rationale, response type, and rich text presence.

Our dataset upholds the highest standards of quality and accuracy. Each prompt undergoes meticulous validation, and the corresponding responses and rationales are thoroughly verified. We prioritize inclusivity, ensuring that the dataset incorporates prompts and completions representing diverse perspectives and writing styles, maintaining an unbiased and discrimination-free stance.

The Hindi version is grammatically accurate without any spelling or grammatical errors. No copyrighted, toxic, or harmful content is used during the construction of this dataset.

The entire dataset was prepared with the assistance of human curators from the FutureBeeAI crowd community. Ongoing efforts are made to add more assets to this dataset, ensuring its growth and relevance. Additionally, FutureBeeAI offers the ability to gather custom chain of thought prompt completion data tailored to specific needs, providing flexibility and customization options.

The dataset, created by FutureBeeAI, is now available for commercial use. Researchers, data scientists, and developers can leverage this fully labeled and ready-to-deploy Hindi Chain of Thought Prompt Completion Dataset to enhance the rationale and accurate response generation capabilities of their generative AI models and explore new approaches to NLP tasks.

The Punjabi Open-Ended Question Answering Dataset is a meticulously curated collection of comprehensive Question-Answer pairs. It serves as a valuable resource for training Large Language Models (LLMs) and Question-answering models in the Punjabi language, advancing the field of artificial intelligence.

Dataset Content:

This QA dataset comprises a diverse set of open-ended questions paired with corresponding answers in Punjabi. There is no context paragraph given to choose an answer from, and each question is answered without any predefined context content. The questions cover a broad range of topics, including science, history, technology, geography, literature, current affairs, and more.

Each question is accompanied by an answer, providing valuable information and insights to enhance the language model training process. Both the questions and answers were manually curated by native Punjabi people, and references were taken from diverse sources like books, news articles, websites, and other reliable references.

This question-answer prompt completion dataset contains different types of prompts, including instruction type, continuation type, and in-context learning (zero-shot, few-shot) type. The dataset also contains questions and answers with different types of rich text, including tables, code, JSON, etc., with proper markdown.

Question Diversity:

To ensure diversity, this Q&A dataset includes questions with varying complexity levels, ranging from easy to medium and hard. Different types of questions, such as multiple-choice, direct, and true/false, are included. Additionally, questions are further classified into fact-based and opinion-based categories, creating a comprehensive variety. The QA dataset also contains the question with constraints and persona restrictions, which makes it even more useful for LLM training.

Answer Formats:

To accommodate varied learning experiences, the dataset incorporates different types of answer formats. These formats include single-word, short phrases, single sentences, and paragraph types of answers. The answer contains text strings, numerical values, date and time formats as well. Such diversity strengthens the Language model's ability to generate coherent and contextually appropriate answers.

Data Format and Annotation Details:

This fully labeled Punjabi Open Ended Question Answer Dataset is available in JSON and CSV formats. It includes annotation details such as id, language, domain, question_length, prompt_type, question_category, question_type, complexity, answer_type, rich_text.

Quality and Accuracy:

The dataset upholds the highest standards of quality and accuracy. Each question undergoes careful validation, and the corresponding answers are thoroughly verified. To prioritize inclusivity, the dataset incorporates questions and answers representing diverse perspectives and writing styles, ensuring it remains unbiased and avoids perpetuating discrimination.

Both the question and answers in Punjabi are grammatically accurate without any word or grammatical errors. No copyrighted, toxic, or harmful content is used while building this dataset.

Continuous Updates and Customization:

The entire dataset was prepared with the assistance of human curators from the FutureBeeAI crowd community. Continuous efforts are made to add more assets to this dataset, ensuring its growth and relevance. Additionally, FutureBeeAI offers the ability to collect custom question-answer data tailored to specific needs, providing flexibility and customization options.

License:

The dataset, created by FutureBeeAI, is now ready for commercial use. Researchers, data scientists, and developers can utilize this fully labeled and ready-to-deploy Punjabi Open Ended Question Answer Dataset to enhance the language understanding capabilities of their generative ai models, improve response generation, and explore new approaches to NLP question-answering tasks.

The Turkish Closed-Ended Question Answering Dataset is a meticulously curated collection of 5000 comprehensive Question-Answer pairs. It serves as a valuable resource for training Large Language Models (LLMs) and question-answering models in the Turkish language, advancing the field of artificial intelligence.

Dataset Content

This closed-ended QA dataset comprises a diverse set of context paragraphs and questions paired with corresponding answers in Turkish. There is a context paragraph given for each question to get the answer from. The questions cover a broad range of topics, including science, history, technology, geography, literature, current affairs, and more.

Each question is accompanied by an answer, providing valuable information and insights to enhance the language model training process. Both the questions and answers were manually curated by native Turkish people, and references were taken from diverse sources like books, news articles, websites, web forums, and other reliable references.

This question-answer prompt completion dataset contains different types of prompts, including instruction type, continuation type, and in-context learning (zero-shot, few-shot) type. The dataset also contains questions and answers with different types of rich text, including tables, code, JSON, etc., with proper markdown.

Question Diversity

To ensure diversity, this Q&A dataset includes questions with varying complexity levels, ranging from easy to medium and hard. Different types of questions, such as multiple-choice, direct, and true/false, are included. The QA dataset also contains questions with constraints, which makes it even more useful for LLM training.

Answer Formats

To accommodate varied learning experiences, the dataset incorporates different types of answer formats. These formats include single-word, short phrases, single sentences, and paragraphs types of answers. The answers contain text strings, numerical values, date and time formats as well. Such diversity strengthens the language model's ability to generate coherent and contextually appropriate answers.

Data Format and Annotation Details

This fully labeled Turkish Closed-Ended Question Answer Dataset is available in JSON and CSV formats. It includes annotation details such as a unique id, context paragraph, context reference link, question, question type, question complexity, question category, domain, prompt type, answer, answer type, and rich text presence.

Quality and Accuracy

The dataset upholds the highest standards of quality and accuracy. Each question undergoes careful validation, and the corresponding answers are thoroughly verified. To prioritize inclusivity, the dataset incorporates questions and answers representing diverse perspectives and writing styles, ensuring it remains unbiased and avoids perpetuating discrimination.

The Turkish versions is grammatically accurate without any spelling or grammatical errors. No toxic or harmful content is used while building this dataset.

Continuous Updates and Customization

The entire dataset was prepared with the assistance of human curators from the FutureBeeAI crowd community. Continuous efforts are made to add more assets to this dataset, ensuring its growth and relevance. Additionally, FutureBeeAI offers the ability to collect custom question-answer data tailored to specific needs, providing flexibility and customization options.

License:

The dataset, created by FutureBeeAI, is now ready for commercial use. Researchers, data scientists, and developers can utilize this fully labeled and ready-to-deploy Turkish Closed-Ended Question Answer Dataset to enhance the language understanding capabilities of their generative AI models, improve response generation, and explore new approaches to NLP question-answering tasks.