You can check the fields description in the documentation: current Full database: https://docs.dataforseo.com/v3/databases/google/full/?bash; Historical Full database: https://docs.dataforseo.com/v3/databases/google/history/full/?bash.

Full Google Database is a combination of the Advanced Google SERP Database and Google Keyword Database.

Google SERP Database offers millions of SERPs collected in 67 regions with most of Google’s advanced SERP features, including featured snippets, knowledge graphs, people also ask sections, top stories, and more.

Google Keyword Database encompasses billions of search terms enriched with related Google Ads data: search volume trends, CPC, competition, and more.

This database is available in JSON format only.

You don’t have to download fresh data dumps in JSON – we can deliver data straight to your storage or database. We send terrabytes of data to dozens of customers every month using Amazon S3, Google Cloud Storage, Microsoft Azure Blob, Eleasticsearch, and Google Big Query. Let us know if you’d like to get your data to any other storage or database.

Dataset

This dataset was created by Venessa

Released under Database: Open Database, Contents: Database Contents

Contents

This dataset compares how much U.S. adults trust ChatGPT relative to Google Search, including responses from a 2025 national survey measuring perceptions of AI accuracy and reliability.

This dashboard provide insights by month on how people find State of Iowa agency listings on the web via Google Search and Maps, and what they do once they find it to include providing reviews (ratings), accessing agency websites, requesting directions, and making calls.

Experimental studies in the area of Psychology and Behavioral Economics have suggested that people change their search pattern in response to positive and negative events. Using Internet search data provided by Google, we investigated the relationship between stock-specific events and related Google searches. We studied daily data from 13 stocks from the Dow-Jones and NASDAQ100 indices, over a period of 4 trading years. Focusing on periods in which stocks were extensively searched (Intensive Search Periods), we found a correlation between the magnitude of stock returns at the beginning of the period and the volume, peak, and duration of search generated during the period. This relation between magnitudes of stock returns and subsequent searches was considerably magnified in periods following negative stock returns. Yet, we did not find that intensive search periods following losses were associated with more Google searches than periods following gains. Thus, rather than increasing search, losses improved the fit between people’s search behavior and the extent of real-world events triggering the search. The findings demonstrate the robustness of the attentional effect of losses.

Context

The World Bank is an international financial institution that provides loans to countries of the world for capital projects. The World Bank's stated goal is the reduction of poverty. Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Bank

Content

This dataset combines key education statistics from a variety of sources to provide a look at global literacy, spending, and access.

For more information, see the World Bank website.

Fork this kernel to get started with this dataset.

Acknowledgements

https://bigquery.cloud.google.com/dataset/bigquery-public-data:world_bank_health_population

http://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/ed-stats

https://cloud.google.com/bigquery/public-data/world-bank-education

Citation: The World Bank: Education Statistics

Dataset Source: World Bank. This dataset is publicly available for anyone to use under the following terms provided by the Dataset Source - http://www.data.gov/privacy-policy#data_policy - and is provided "AS IS" without any warranty, express or implied, from Google. Google disclaims all liability for any damages, direct or indirect, resulting from the use of the dataset.

Banner Photo by @till_indeman from Unplash.

Inspiration

Of total government spending, what percentage is spent on education?

About ArXiv

For nearly 30 years, ArXiv has served the public and research communities by providing open access to scholarly articles, from the vast branches of physics to the many subdisciplines of computer science to everything in between, including math, statistics, electrical engineering, quantitative biology, and economics. This rich corpus of information offers significant, but sometimes overwhelming depth.

In these times of unique global challenges, efficient extraction of insights from data is essential. To help make the arXiv more accessible, we present a free, open pipeline on Kaggle to the machine-readable arXiv dataset: a repository of 1.7 million articles, with relevant features such as article titles, authors, categories, abstracts, full text PDFs, and more.

Our hope is to empower new use cases that can lead to the exploration of richer machine learning techniques that combine multi-modal features towards applications like trend analysis, paper recommender engines, category prediction, co-citation networks, knowledge graph construction and semantic search interfaces.

The dataset is freely available via Google Cloud Storage buckets (more info here). Stay tuned for weekly updates to the dataset!

ArXiv is a collaboratively funded, community-supported resource founded by Paul Ginsparg in 1991 and maintained and operated by Cornell University.

The release of this dataset was featured further in a Kaggle blog post here.

https://storage.googleapis.com/kaggle-public-downloads/arXiv.JPG" alt="">

See here for more information.

ArXiv On Kaggle

Metadata

This dataset is a mirror of the original ArXiv data. Because the full dataset is rather large (1.1TB and growing), this dataset provides only a metadata file in the json format. This file contains an entry for each paper, containing: - id: ArXiv ID (can be used to access the paper, see below) - submitter: Who submitted the paper - authors: Authors of the paper - title: Title of the paper - comments: Additional info, such as number of pages and figures - journal-ref: Information about the journal the paper was published in - doi: https://www.doi.org - abstract: The abstract of the paper - categories: Categories / tags in the ArXiv system - versions: A version history

You can access each paper directly on ArXiv using these links: - https://arxiv.org/abs/{id}: Page for this paper including its abstract and further links - https://arxiv.org/pdf/{id}: Direct link to download the PDF

Bulk access

The full set of PDFs is available for free in the GCS bucket gs://arxiv-dataset or through Google API (json documentation and xml documentation).

You can use for example gsutil to download the data to your local machine. ```

List files:

gsutil cp gs://arxiv-dataset/arxiv/

Download pdfs from March 2020:

gsutil cp gs://arxiv-dataset/arxiv/arxiv/pdf/2003/ ./a_local_directory/

Download all the source files

gsutil cp -r gs://arxiv-dataset/arxiv/ ./a_local_directory/ ```

Update Frequency

We're automatically updating the metadata as well as the GCS bucket on a weekly basis.

License

Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication applies to the metadata in this dataset. See https://arxiv.org/help/license for further details and licensing on individual papers.

Acknowledgements

The original data is maintained by ArXiv, huge thanks to the team for building and maintaining this dataset.

We're using https://github.com/mattbierbaum/arxiv-public-datasets to pull the original data, thanks to Matt Bierbaum for providing this tool.

This dataset provides insights by month on how people find State of Iowa agency listings on the web via Google Search and Maps, and what they do once they find it to include providing reviews (ratings), accessing agency websites, requesting directions, and making calls.

This dataset investigates the relationship between Wordle answers and Google search spikes, particularly for uncommon words. It spans from June 21, 2021 to June 24, 2025.

It includes daily data for each Wordle answer, its search trend on that day, and frequency-based commonality indicators.

🔍 Hypothesis

Each Wordle answer causes a spike in search volume on the day it appears — more so if the word is rare.

This dataset supports exploration of:

• Wordle Answers
• Trends for wordle answers
• Correlation between wordle answer rarity and search interest

Columns

Notes: - All trend values are relative (0–100 scale, per Google Trends)

🧮 Methodology

• Wordle answers were scraped from wordfinder.yourdictionary.com
• Commonality scores were computed using:
  • wordfreq Python library
  • SUBTLEX-US dataset (subtitle frequency, approximating spoken English)
• Trend data was fetched using Google Trends API via pytrends

📊 Analysis

Can find analysis done using this data in the blog post

The Quick Draw Dataset is a collection of 50 million drawings across 345 categories, contributed by players of the game "Quick, Draw!". The drawings were captured as timestamped vectors, tagged with metadata including what the player was asked to draw and in which country the player was located.

Example drawings: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/googlecreativelab/quickdraw-dataset/master/preview.jpg" alt="preview">

IndianFoodNet-30

About IndianFoodNet-30

IndianFoodNet-30 is created by Ritu Agarwal, Nikunj Bansal, Tanupriya Choudhury, Tanmay Sarkar & Neelu Jyothi Ahuja with a goal of building an Indian Food detection model. It contains more than 5500 images of 30 popular Indian food items.

Data collection

We used search engines (Google and Bing) to crawl and look for suitable images using JavaScript queries for each food item from the list created. The images with incomplete RGB channels were removed, and the images collected from different search engines were compiled. When downloading images from search engines, many images were irrelevant to the purpose, especially the ones with a lot of text in them. We deployed the EAST text detector to segregate such images. Finally, a comprehensive manual inspection was conducted to ensure the relevancy of images in the dataset.

Fair use

This dataset contains some copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owners. In an effort to advance scientific research, we make this material available for academic research. If you wish to use copyrighted material in our dataset for purposes of your own that go beyond non-commercial research and academic purposes, you must obtain permission directly from the copyright owner. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for non-commercial research and educational purposes.(adapted from Christopher Thomas).

Citation

If you find our dataset useful, please cite us as: @dataset{dataset, author = {Agarwal, Ritu and Bansal, Nikunj and Choudhury, Tanupriya and Sarkar, Tanmay and J.Ahuja, Neelu}, year = {2023}, title = {IndianFoodNet-30 Dataset}, publisher = {Roboflow Universe}, url = {https://universe.roboflow.com/indianfoodnet/indianfoodnet}, }

Context

The CMS National Plan and Provider Enumeration System (NPPES) was developed as part of the Administrative Simplification provisions in the original HIPAA act. The primary purpose of NPPES was to develop a unique identifier for each physician that billed medicare and medicaid. This identifier is now known as the National Provider Identifier Standard (NPI) which is a required 10 digit number that is unique to an individual provider at the national level.

Once an NPI record is assigned to a healthcare provider, parts of the NPI record that have public relevance, including the provider’s name, speciality, and practice address are published in a searchable website as well as downloadable file of zipped data containing all of the FOIA disclosable health care provider data in NPPES and a separate PDF file of code values which documents and lists the descriptions for all of the codes found in the data file.

Content

The dataset contains the latest NPI downloadable file in an easy to query BigQuery table, npi_raw. In addition, there is a second table, npi_optimized which harnesses the power of Big Query’s next-generation columnar storage format to provide an analytical view of the NPI data containing description fields for the codes based on the mappings in Data Dissemination Public File - Code Values documentation as well as external lookups to the healthcare provider taxonomy codes . While this generates hundreds of columns, BigQuery makes it possible to process all this data effectively and have a convenient single lookup table for all provider information.

Fork this kernel to get started.

Acknowledgements

https://bigquery.cloud.google.com/dataset/bigquery-public-data:nppes?_ga=2.117120578.-577194880.1523455401

https://console.cloud.google.com/marketplace/details/hhs/nppes?filter=category:science-research

Dataset Source: Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services. This dataset is publicly available for anyone to use under the following terms provided by the Dataset Source - http://www.data.gov/privacy-policy#data_policy — and is provided "AS IS" without any warranty, express or implied, from Google. Google disclaims all liability for any damages, direct or indirect, resulting from the use of the dataset.

Banner Photo by @rawpixel from Unplash.

Inspiration

What are the top ten most common types of physicians in Mountain View?

What are the names and phone numbers of dentists in California who studied public health?

This is the second version of the Google Landmarks dataset (GLDv2), which contains images annotated with labels representing human-made and natural landmarks. The dataset can be used for landmark recognition and retrieval experiments. This version of the dataset contains approximately 5 million images, split into 3 sets of images: train, index and test. The dataset was presented in our CVPR'20 paper. In this repository, we present download links for all dataset files and relevant code for metric computation. This dataset was associated to two Kaggle challenges, on landmark recognition and landmark retrieval. Results were discussed as part of a CVPR'19 workshop. In this repository, we also provide scores for the top 10 teams in the challenges, based on the latest ground-truth version. Please visit the challenge and workshop webpages for more details on the data, tasks and technical solutions from top teams.

Update — December 7, 2014. – Evidence-based medicine (EBM) is not working for many reasons, for example: 1. Incorrect in their foundations (paradox): hierarchical levels of evidence are supported by opinions (i.e., lowest strength of evidence according to EBM) instead of real data collected from different types of study designs (i.e., evidence). http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1122534 2. The effect of criminal practices by pharmaceutical companies is only possible because of the complicity of others: healthcare systems, professional associations, governmental and academic institutions. Pharmaceutical companies also corrupt at the personal level, politicians and political parties are on their payroll, medical professionals seduced by different types of gifts in exchange of prescriptions (i.e., bribery) which very likely results in patients not receiving the proper treatment for their disease, many times there is no such thing: healthy persons not needing pharmacological treatments of any kind are constantly misdiagnosed and treated with unnecessary drugs. Some medical professionals are converted in K.O.L. which is only a puppet appearing on stage to spread lies to their peers, a person supposedly trained to improve the well-being of others, now deceits on behalf of pharmaceutical companies. Probably the saddest thing is that many honest doctors are being misled by these lies created by the rules of pharmaceutical marketing instead of scientific, medical, and ethical principles. Interpretation of EBM in this context was not anticipated by their creators. “The main reason we take so many drugs is that drug companies don’t sell drugs, they sell lies about drugs.” ―Peter C. Gøtzsche “doctors and their organisations should recognise that it is unethical to receive money that has been earned in part through crimes that have harmed those people whose interests doctors are expected to take care of. Many crimes would be impossible to carry out if doctors weren’t willing to participate in them.” —Peter C Gøtzsche, The BMJ, 2012, Big pharma often commits corporate crime, and this must be stopped. Pending (Colombia): Health Promoter Entities (In Spanish: EPS ―Empresas Promotoras de Salud).

1. Misinterpretations New technologies or concepts are difficult to understand in the beginning, it doesn’t matter their simplicity, we need to get used to new tools aimed to improve our professional practice. Probably the best explanation is here in these videos (credits to Antonio Villafaina for sharing these videos with me). English https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pQHX-SjgQvQ&w=420&h=315 Spanish https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DApozQBrlhU&w=420&h=315 ----------------------- Hypothesis: hierarchical levels of evidence based medicine are wrong Dear Editor, I have data to support the hypothesis described in the title of this letter. Before rejecting the null hypothesis I would like to ask the following open question:Could you support with data that hierarchical levels of evidence based medicine are correct? (1,2) Additional explanation to this question: – Only respond to this question attaching publicly available raw data.– Be aware that more than a question this is a challenge: I have data (i.e., evidence) which is contrary to classic (i.e., McMaster) or current (i.e., Oxford) hierarchical levels of evidence based medicine. An important part of this data (but not all) is publicly available. References
2. Ramirez, Jorge H (2014): The EBM challenge. figshare. http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1135873
3. The EBM Challenge Day 1: No Answers. Competing interests: I endorse the principles of open data in human biomedical research Read this letter on The BMJ – August 13, 2014.http://www.bmj.com/content/348/bmj.g3725/rr/762595Re: Greenhalgh T, et al. Evidence based medicine: a movement in crisis? BMJ 2014; 348: g3725. _ Fileset contents Raw data: Excel archive: Raw data, interactive figures, and PubMed search terms. Google Spreadsheet is also available (URL below the article description). Figure 1. Unadjusted (Fig 1A) and adjusted (Fig 1B) PubMed publication trends (01/01/1992 to 30/06/2014). Figure 2. Adjusted PubMed publication trends (07/01/2008 to 29/06/2014) Figure 3. Google search trends: Jan 2004 to Jun 2014 / 1-week periods. Figure 4. PubMed publication trends (1962-2013) systematic reviews and meta-analysis, clinical trials, and observational studies.
   Figure 5. Ramirez, Jorge H (2014): Infographics: Unpublished US phase 3 clinical trials (2002-2014) completed before Jan 2011 = 50.8%. figshare.http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1121675 Raw data: "13377 studies found for: Completed | Interventional Studies | Phase 3 | received from 01/01/2002 to 01/01/2014 | Worldwide". This database complies with the terms and conditions of ClinicalTrials.gov: http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/about-site/terms-conditions Supplementary Figures (S1-S6). PubMed publication delay in the indexation processes does not explain the descending trends in the scientific output of evidence-based medicine. Acknowledgments I would like to acknowledge the following persons for providing valuable concepts in data visualization and infographics:
4. Maria Fernanda Ramírez. Professor of graphic design. Universidad del Valle. Cali, Colombia.
5. Lorena Franco. Graphic design student. Universidad del Valle. Cali, Colombia. Related articles by this author (Jorge H. Ramírez)
6. Ramirez JH. Lack of transparency in clinical trials: a call for action. Colomb Med (Cali) 2013;44(4):243-6. URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24892242
7. Ramirez JH. Re: Evidence based medicine is broken (17 June 2014). http://www.bmj.com/node/759181
8. Ramirez JH. Re: Global rules for global health: why we need an independent, impartial WHO (19 June 2014). http://www.bmj.com/node/759151
9. Ramirez JH. PubMed publication trends (1992 to 2014): evidence based medicine and clinical practice guidelines (04 July 2014). http://www.bmj.com/content/348/bmj.g3725/rr/759895 Recommended articles
10. Greenhalgh Trisha, Howick Jeremy,Maskrey Neal. Evidence based medicine: a movement in crisis? BMJ 2014;348:g3725
11. Spence Des. Evidence based medicine is broken BMJ 2014; 348:g22
12. Schünemann Holger J, Oxman Andrew D,Brozek Jan, Glasziou Paul, JaeschkeRoman, Vist Gunn E et al. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations for diagnostic tests and strategies BMJ 2008; 336:1106
13. Lau Joseph, Ioannidis John P A, TerrinNorma, Schmid Christopher H, OlkinIngram. The case of the misleading funnel plot BMJ 2006; 333:597
14. Moynihan R, Henry D, Moons KGM (2014) Using Evidence to Combat Overdiagnosis and Overtreatment: Evaluating Treatments, Tests, and Disease Definitions in the Time of Too Much. PLoS Med 11(7): e1001655. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001655
15. Katz D. A-holistic view of evidence based medicinehttp://thehealthcareblog.com/blog/2014/05/02/a-holistic-view-of-evidence-based-medicine/ ---

As global communities responded to COVID-19, we heard from public health officials that the same type of aggregated, anonymized insights we use in products such as Google Maps would be helpful as they made critical decisions to combat COVID-19. These Community Mobility Reports aimed to provide insights into what changed in response to policies aimed at combating COVID-19. The reports charted movement trends over time by geography, across different categories of places such as retail and recreation, groceries and pharmacies, parks, transit stations, workplaces, and residential.

Allergen30

About Allergen30

Allergen30 is created by Mayank Mishra, Nikunj Bansal, Tanmay Sarkar and Tanupriya Choudhury with a goal of building a robust detection model that can assist people in avoiding possible allergic reactions.

It contains more than 6,000 images of 30 commonly used food items which can cause an adverse reaction within a human body. This dataset is one of the first research attempts in training a deep learning based computer vision model to detect the presence of such food items from images. It also serves as a benchmark for evaluating the efficacy of object detection methods in learning the otherwise difficult visual cues related to food items.

Description of class labels

There are multiple food items pertaining to specific food intolerances which can trigger an allergic reaction. Such food intolerance primarily include Lactose, Histamine, Gluten, Salicylate, Caffeine and Ovomucoid intolerance. https://github.com/mmayank74567/mmayank74567.github.io/blob/master/images/FoodIntol.png?raw=true" alt="Food intolerance">

The following table contains the description relating to the 30 class labels in our dataset.

Data collection

We used search engines (Google and Bing) to crawl and look for suitable images using JavaScript queries for each food item from the list created. The images with incomplete RGB channels were removed, and the images collected from different search engines were compiled. When downloading images from search engines, many images were irrelevant to the purpose, especially the ones with a lot of text in them. We deployed the EAST text detector to segregate such images. Finally, a comprehensive manual inspection was conducted to ensure the relevancy of images in the dataset.

Fair use

This dataset contains some copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owners. In an effort to advance scientific research, we make this material available for academic research. If you wish to use copyrighted material in our dataset for purposes of your own that go beyond non-commercial research and academic purposes, you must obtain permission directly from the copyright owner. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for non-commercial research and educational purposes.(adapted from Christopher Thomas).

**Citatio

The global number of smartphone users in was forecast to continuously increase between 2024 and 2029 by in total 1.8 billion users (+42.62 percent). After the ninth consecutive increasing year, the smartphone user base is estimated to reach 6.1 billion users and therefore a new peak in 2029. Notably, the number of smartphone users of was continuously increasing over the past years.Smartphone users here are limited to internet users of any age using a smartphone. The shown figures have been derived from survey data that has been processed to estimate missing demographics.The shown data are an excerpt of Statista's Key Market Indicators (KMI). The KMI are a collection of primary and secondary indicators on the macro-economic, demographic and technological environment in up to 150 countries and regions worldwide. All indicators are sourced from international and national statistical offices, trade associations and the trade press and they are processed to generate comparable data sets (see supplementary notes under details for more information).Find more key insights for the number of smartphone users in countries like Australia & Oceania and Asia.

The American Community Survey (ACS) is an ongoing survey that provides vital information on a yearly basis about our nation and its people by contacting over 3.5 million households across the country. The resulting data provides incredibly detailed demographic information across the US aggregated at various geographic levels which helps determine how more than $675 billion in federal and state funding are distributed each year. Businesses use ACS data to inform strategic decision-making. ACS data can be used as a component of market research, provide information about concentrations of potential employees with a specific education or occupation, and which communities could be good places to build offices or facilities. For example, someone scouting a new location for an assisted-living center might look for an area with a large proportion of seniors and a large proportion of people employed in nursing occupations. Through the ACS, we know more about jobs and occupations, educational attainment, veterans, whether people own or rent their homes, and other topics. Public officials, planners, and entrepreneurs use this information to assess the past and plan the future. For more information, see the Census Bureau's ACS Information Guide . This public dataset is hosted in Google BigQuery as part of the Google Cloud Public Datasets Program , with Carto providing cleaning and onboarding support. It is included in BigQuery's 1TB/mo of free tier processing. This means that each user receives 1TB of free BigQuery processing every month, which can be used to run queries on this public dataset. Watch this short video to learn how to get started quickly using BigQuery to access public datasets. What is BigQuery .

A dataset providing information about local council services in Leeds. Leeds City Council uses this information to populate the Knowledge Panels on the Google search website. The dataset includes type of service, contact information and opening times. What is a Knowledge Panel? When people search for a business on Google, they may see information about that business in a box that appears to the right of their search results. The information in the box, called the Knowledge Panel, can help customers discover and contact your business. Is the information correct? If you spot any information which you believe to be incorrect please contact us on webmaster@leeds.gov.uk . We can then investigate this and update this dataset and the Google Knowledge Panel. Automated update This dataset is automatically updated on a fortnightly basis

IoTeX is a decentralized crypto system, a new generation of blockchain platform for the development of the Internet of things (IoT). The project team is sure that the users do not have such an application that would motivate to implement the technology of the Internet of things in life. And while this will not be created, people will not have the desire to spend money and time on IoT. The developers of IoTeX decided to implement not the application itself, but the platform for creation. It is through the platform that innovative steps in the space of the Internet of things will be encouraged. Learn more... This dataset is one of many crypto datasets that are available within the Google Cloud Public Datasets . As with other Google Cloud public datasets, you can query this dataset for free, up to 1TB/month of free processing, every month. Watch this short video to learn how to get started with the public datasets. Want to know how the data from these blockchains were brought into BigQuery, and learn how to analyze the data? En savoir plus