The population share with mobile internet access in North America was forecast to increase between 2024 and 2029 by in total 2.9 percentage points. This overall increase does not happen continuously, notably not in 2028 and 2029. The mobile internet penetration is estimated to amount to 84.21 percent in 2029. Notably, the population share with mobile internet access of was continuously increasing over the past years.The penetration rate refers to the share of the total population having access to the internet via a mobile broadband connection.The shown data are an excerpt of Statista's Key Market Indicators (KMI). The KMI are a collection of primary and secondary indicators on the macro-economic, demographic and technological environment in up to 150 countries and regions worldwide. All indicators are sourced from international and national statistical offices, trade associations and the trade press and they are processed to generate comparable data sets (see supplementary notes under details for more information).Find more key insights for the population share with mobile internet access in countries like Caribbean and Europe.

The global number of smartphone users in was forecast to continuously increase between 2024 and 2029 by in total 1.8 billion users (+42.62 percent). After the ninth consecutive increasing year, the smartphone user base is estimated to reach 6.1 billion users and therefore a new peak in 2029. Notably, the number of smartphone users of was continuously increasing over the past years.Smartphone users here are limited to internet users of any age using a smartphone. The shown figures have been derived from survey data that has been processed to estimate missing demographics.The shown data are an excerpt of Statista's Key Market Indicators (KMI). The KMI are a collection of primary and secondary indicators on the macro-economic, demographic and technological environment in up to 150 countries and regions worldwide. All indicators are sourced from international and national statistical offices, trade associations and the trade press and they are processed to generate comparable data sets (see supplementary notes under details for more information).Find more key insights for the number of smartphone users in countries like Australia & Oceania and Asia.

Statistics of how many adults access the internet and use different types of technology covering: home internet access how people connect to the web how often people use the web/computers whether people use mobile devices whether people buy goods over the web whether people carried out specified activities over the internet For more information see the ONS website and the UKDS website.

Switzerland is leading the ranking by population share with mobile internet access, recording 95.06 percent. Following closely behind is Ukraine with 95.06 percent, while Moldova is trailing the ranking with 46.83 percent, resulting in a difference of 48.23 percentage points to the ranking leader, Switzerland. The penetration rate refers to the share of the total population having access to the internet via a mobile broadband connection. The shown data are an excerpt of Statista's Key Market Indicators (KMI). The KMI are a collection of primary and secondary indicators on the macro-economic, demographic and technological environment in up to 150 countries and regions worldwide. All indicators are sourced from international and national statistical offices, trade associations and the trade press and they are processed to generate comparable data sets (see supplementary notes under details for more information).

When asked about "Attitudes towards the internet", most Mexican respondents pick "It is important to me to have mobile internet access in any place" as an answer. 56 percent did so in our online survey in 2025. Looking to gain valuable insights about users of internet providers worldwide? Check out our reports on consumers who use internet providers. These reports give readers a thorough picture of these customers, including their identities, preferences, opinions, and methods of communication.

Attitudes of parents towards safer internet use for children. Topics: number of children in household between the age of 6 and 17; sex of child whose birthday is closest to date of interview; age of the child; frequency of personal internet use; internet use of the child: from personal computer at home, from family’s computer at home, at school, in internet café, at friends’ homes, in public places, somewhere else; frequency of the following measures with regard to child’s internet use at home: stay nearby, sit with the child, ask child about online activities, check computer later, check child’s messages, check whether child has a profile on a social network; restrictions regarding the child’s internet use; allowed activities: spend a lot of time online, talk to people unknown in real life, use email and instant messaging tools, use chat rooms, create profile in online community, access certain websites, download content, buy online, give out personal information; child’s use of mobile phone with internet access; concern about the child’s internet use via mobile phone with regard to the following activities: give out personal information online, see sexually or violently explicit images on the internet, be bullied by other children online, see sexually or violently explicit images via mobile phone, be bullied by other children via mobile phone, get information about self-harm, become isolated if spending too much time online, be victim of online grooming; use of filtering or monitoring software at computer at home; reasons for not using filtering or monitoring software; child ever been in need of help concerning unclear situation on the internet; kind of situation; most effective measures with regard to safer and more effective internet use for the child; most important sources of information on safety tools and safe internet usage; first point to turn to in case of encountering illegal content. Demography: sex; age; age at end of education; occupation; professional position; type of community. Additionally coded was: respondent ID; interviewer ID; language of the interview; country; date of interview; time of the beginning of the interview; duration of the interview; type of phone line; region; weighting factor. Internetnutzung durch Kinder. Sicherheitsmaßnahmen der Eltern. Themen: Anzahl der Kinder zwischen 6-17 Jahren im Haushalt; Auswahl des Kindes, über das die Eltern berichten durch die Geburtstagsmethode; Geschlecht; Alter des Kindes; Häufigkeit der Internetnutzung; Nutzung des Internets außerhalb der Wohnung; Orte des Internetzugangs des Kindes; Kontrollmaßnahme bei der Internetnutzung durch das Kind (Skala); Beschränkungen der Internetnutzung für das Kind; weitere Einschränkungen der Internetnutzung: viel Zeit online verbringen, Unterhaltungen mit Unbekannten (Chatten), Nutzung von Kontaktmedien (instant messaging), Nutzung von Chaträumen, Erstellen eines Online-Profils, Besuch bestimmter Web-Seiten, Download von Musik und Filmen, Onlineshopping, Herausgabe persönlicher Daten; Handy-Besitz des Kindes; Besorgnis über die Internetnutzung bzw. die Handy-Nutzung durch das Kind (Skala); installierte Filter- oder Kontrollsoftware; Gründe für eine Entscheidung gegen Kontrollsoftware; Hilfesuchen seitens des Kindes bei der Internetnutzung; Art der Hilfeleistung: bei technischen Problemen, bei Online-Belästigung, bei der Informationssuche, bei Online-Schikane, bei Online-Kontaktaufnahme durch Fremde, bei dem Fund von sexuellen oder gewalttätigen Bildern; Maßnahmen, die zu einer erhöhten Sicherheit des Internets für Kinder führen würden: Aufklärung in Schulen, Information der Eltern, Kurse für Eltern, bessere Kontrollsoftware, strengere Regulierungen bei Providern von Internetseiten, Kampagnen zur Aufklärung über Onlinerisiken, Kontaktstellen zur sicheren Internetnutzung; Informationsquelle über Sicherheitstools; Kontaktstelle bei einem Fund illegaler Inhalte: Polizei, Hotlines, gemeinnützige Organisationen. Demographie: Geschlecht; Alter; Alter bei Beendigung der Ausbildung; Beruf; berufliche Stellung; Urbanisierungsgrad. Zusätzlich verkodet wurde: Befragten-ID; Interviewer-ID; Interviewsprache; Land; Interviewdatum; Interviewdauer (Interviewbeginn und Interviewende); Interviewmodus (Mobiltelefon oder Festnetz); Region; Gewichtungsfaktor.

Attitudes towards the benefits of internet and mobile phone use. Topics: frequency of the following leisure activities: sport, cultural activities, watch TV, go out, pursue a hobby, keep oneself informed, meet friends; frequency of participating in activities of organisations; trust in other people; frequency of internet use; online activities: send or receive emails or instant messages, purchase goods or services, internet banking, download multimedia content or software, use electronic forms of public administration, learn, use social networks, look for information, read or watch news, upload content, do daily work, transfer content to other devices; assessment of the improvement in selected areas due to the internet: opportunity to meet new people, way to manage finances, way to deal with public authorities, way to get health-related information, way to perform job, way to shop, opportunity to learn, way to pursue hobbies, capability to be informed, personal relationships, opportunity to access culture; attitude towards the following statements on people that don’t use the internet: miss opportunity of greater contact to people, are at disadvantage in career prospects, are at risk of becoming old-fashioned, miss opportunity of finding good bargains, are less open to the world, are less informed, have more time, are not at risk of online fraud, are not at risk of others finding out personal information about them, are less reachable for professional purposes, avoid frustration of dealing with complicated technologies; asked other person in the last year to send email, get information from the internet or make online purchase for oneself; frequency of mobile phone use; assessment of the improvement in selected areas due to mobile phones: keep contact with people, capability to be informed, way to manage free time, share content, feel more secure, work; attitude towards the following statements on people that don’t use mobile phones: miss opportunity of greater contact to people, are less reachable, are saving money, have less stress. Demography: sex; age; age at end of education; occupation; professional position; region; type of community; household composition and household size. Additionally coded was: respondent ID; interviewer ID; language of the interview; country; date of interview; time of the beginning of the interview; duration of the interview; type of phone line; weighting factor. Aktivitäten in der Freizeit. Internet- und Mobiltelefonnutzung. Vor- und Nachteile der Internet- und Mobiltelefonnutzung. Themen: Häufigkeit von Freizeitaktivitäten (Sport, Kino, Fernsehen, Gaststättenbesuche, Hobby, Informationssuche, Freundeskontakte); Häufigkeit aktiver Teilnahme an Vereinsaktivitäten; Personenvertrauen; Häufigkeit der Internetnutzung zu privaten Zwecken; Art der Internetnutzung; Verbesserungen durch das Internet: Bekanntschaften machen, Verwaltung von Finanzen, Umgang mit Behörden, Erhalt gesundheitsbezogener Informationen, Ausführung der Arbeit, Tätigung von Einkäufen, Gelegenheit zum Lernen, Ausüben von Hobbies, Information über aktuelle Themen, Kontakte zu Familienmitgliedern und Freunden sowie Gelegenheit zum kulturellen Austausch; Nachteile und Vorteile durch eine Nicht-Nutzung des Internets: geringere Gelegenheit zur persönlichen Kontaktpflege, Nachteile in Bezug auf die beruflichen Perspektiven, Risiko, altmodisch zu werden, weniger Offenheit gegenüber der Außenwelt, geringere Informiertheit, mehr Zeit für Freunde und Familie, geringes Risiko Opfer von Online-Betrug zu werden, höherer Schutz der persönlichen Daten, schlechtere Erreichbarkeit zu beruflichen Zwecken, geringeres Risiko der Frustration durch komplizierte Technologien; Internetnutzung über Freunde oder Verwandte; Nutzung eines Mobiltelefons; Vorteile der Mobiltelefonnutzung: Kontaktpflege mit Familie und Freunden, bessere Informiertheit, Organisation der Freizeit, Austausch von Ideen und Materialien, gesteigertes Sicherheitsgefühl, zu Arbeitszwecken; Auswirkungen durch eine Nicht-Nutzung von Mobiltelefonen: verpasste Gelegenheiten der Kontaktpflege, schlechtere Erreichbarkeit, Kostenersparnis, weniger Stress. Demographie: Geschlecht; Alter; Alter bei Beendigung der Ausbildung; Beruf; berufliche Stellung; Region; Urbanisierungsgrad; Haushaltszusammensetzung und Haushaltsgröße. Zusätzlich verkodet wurde: Befragten-ID; Interviewer-ID; Interviewsprache; Land; Interviewdatum; Interviewdauer (Interviewbeginn und Interviewende); Interviewmodus (Mobiltelefon oder Festnetz); Gewichtungsfaktor.

Aktivitäten in der Freizeit. Internet- und Mobiltelefonnutzung. Vor- und Nachteile der Internet- und Mobiltelefonnutzung. Themen: Häufigkeit von Freizeitaktivitäten (Sport, Kino, Fernsehen, Gaststättenbesuche, Hobby, Informationssuche, Freundeskontakte); Häufigkeit aktiver Teilnahme an Vereinsaktivitäten; Personenvertrauen; Häufigkeit der Internetnutzung zu privaten Zwecken; Art der Internetnutzung; Verbesserungen durch das Internet: Bekanntschaften machen, Verwaltung von Finanzen, Umgang mit Behörden, Erhalt gesundheitsbezogener Informationen, Ausführung der Arbeit, Tätigung von Einkäufen, Gelegenheit zum Lernen, Ausüben von Hobbies, Information über aktuelle Themen, Kontakte zu Familienmitgliedern und Freunden sowie Gelegenheit zum kulturellen Austausch; Nachteile und Vorteile durch eine Nicht-Nutzung des Internets: geringere Gelegenheit zur persönlichen Kontaktpflege, Nachteile in Bezug auf die beruflichen Perspektiven, Risiko, altmodisch zu werden, weniger Offenheit gegenüber der Außenwelt, geringere Informiertheit, mehr Zeit für Freunde und Familie, geringes Risiko Opfer von Online-Betrug zu werden, höherer Schutz der persönlichen Daten, schlechtere Erreichbarkeit zu beruflichen Zwecken, geringeres Risiko der Frustration durch komplizierte Technologien; Internetnutzung über Freunde oder Verwandte; Nutzung eines Mobiltelefons; Vorteile der Mobiltelefonnutzung: Kontaktpflege mit Familie und Freunden, bessere Informiertheit, Organisation der Freizeit, Austausch von Ideen und Materialien, gesteigertes Sicherheitsgefühl, zu Arbeitszwecken; Auswirkungen durch eine Nicht-Nutzung von Mobiltelefonen: verpasste Gelegenheiten der Kontaktpflege, schlechtere Erreichbarkeit, Kostenersparnis, weniger Stress. Demographie: Geschlecht; Alter; Alter bei Beendigung der Ausbildung; Beruf; berufliche Stellung; Region; Urbanisierungsgrad; Haushaltszusammensetzung und Haushaltsgröße. Zusätzlich verkodet wurde: Befragten-ID; Interviewer-ID; Interviewsprache; Land; Interviewdatum; Interviewdauer (Interviewbeginn und Interviewende); Interviewmodus (Mobiltelefon oder Festnetz); Gewichtungsfaktor. Attitudes towards the benefits of internet and mobile phone use. Topics: frequency of the following leisure activities: sport, cultural activities, watch TV, go out, pursue a hobby, keep oneself informed, meet friends; frequency of participating in activities of organisations; trust in other people; frequency of internet use; online activities: send or receive emails or instant messages, purchase goods or services, internet banking, download multimedia content or software, use electronic forms of public administration, learn, use social networks, look for information, read or watch news, upload content, do daily work, transfer content to other devices; assessment of the improvement in selected areas due to the internet: opportunity to meet new people, way to manage finances, way to deal with public authorities, way to get health-related information, way to perform job, way to shop, opportunity to learn, way to pursue hobbies, capability to be informed, personal relationships, opportunity to access culture; attitude towards the following statements on people that don’t use the internet: miss opportunity of greater contact to people, are at disadvantage in career prospects, are at risk of becoming old-fashioned, miss opportunity of finding good bargains, are less open to the world, are less informed, have more time, are not at risk of online fraud, are not at risk of others finding out personal information about them, are less reachable for professional purposes, avoid frustration of dealing with complicated technologies; asked other person in the last year to send email, get information from the internet or make online purchase for oneself; frequency of mobile phone use; assessment of the improvement in selected areas due to mobile phones: keep contact with people, capability to be informed, way to manage free time, share content, feel more secure, work; attitude towards the following statements on people that don’t use mobile phones: miss opportunity of greater contact to people, are less reachable, are saving money, have less stress. Demography: sex; age; age at end of education; occupation; professional position; region; type of community; household composition and household size. Additionally coded was: respondent ID; interviewer ID; language of the interview; country; date of interview; time of the beginning of the interview; duration of the interview; type of phone line; weighting factor.

The global number of internet users in was forecast to continuously increase between 2024 and 2029 by in total 1.3 billion users (+23.66 percent). After the fifteenth consecutive increasing year, the number of users is estimated to reach 7 billion users and therefore a new peak in 2029. Notably, the number of internet users of was continuously increasing over the past years.Depicted is the estimated number of individuals in the country or region at hand, that use the internet. As the datasource clarifies, connection quality and usage frequency are distinct aspects, not taken into account here.The shown data are an excerpt of Statista's Key Market Indicators (KMI). The KMI are a collection of primary and secondary indicators on the macro-economic, demographic and technological environment in up to 150 countries and regions worldwide. All indicators are sourced from international and national statistical offices, trade associations and the trade press and they are processed to generate comparable data sets (see supplementary notes under details for more information).Find more key insights for the number of internet users in countries like the Americas and Asia.

https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/kaggle-user-content/o/inbox%2F4686357%2F186cf4f6172ca2c696819b7b09931bd3%2Fimage3.jpg?generation=1584955857130173&alt=media" alt="">

The presence of business in the digital space is a must now. Indeed, there’s hardly any company, be it a small startup or an international corporation, that wouldn’t be available online. For this, the company may use one of two options — to develop an app or a website, or both.

In the case of a limited budget, business owners often have to make a choice. Thus, considering that mobile traffic bypassed the desktop’s in 2016 and continues to grow, it becomes obvious that the business should become accessible and convenient for smartphone users. But what is better a responsive website or a mobile application?

Entrepreneurs often turn to development companies to ask this question. Lacking sufficient knowledge, they hope to get answers to their questions from people with experience in this field. So, we decided to compile a guide that will give you clear and understandable information.

Mobile app

https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/kaggle-user-content/o/inbox%2F4686357%2F0541557795519f24d812f78dfb51867e%2Fimage4.png?generation=1584955894277647&alt=media" alt="">

Let's look at the stats. It will help you understand why a mobile app may be the obvious choice for your client.

In 2019, smartphone users installed about 204 billion(!) applications on their devices. On average, this is more than 26 applications per inhabitant of the planet Earth. And if this is not enough evidence, here’s one more point. The expected revenue of mobile applications will be $189 billion in 2020.

It sounds impressive, but this does not mean that a mobile application is something indispensable for every business. Not at all. Let's go through the pros and cons of a mobile application and try to understand when it is needed.

Pros

• A new level of interaction. Mobile applications are a more convenient method of interaction. They load and process content faster. One more useful feature is notifications. Perhaps, applications are the best way to inform users about new updates, promotions, and other news (who will read long letters in the mail?).
• Personalized targeting. Mobile applications are ideal for products or services that need to be used on an ongoing basis. The options like creating accounts, entering profile information, etc., make applications more personalized than websites. All this allows the business to target their audience more accurately without wasting money.
• Offline usage. That’s another major advantage. Applications can provide users with access to content without an internet connection.

Cons

• Development costs. In order to reach the maximum audience with a mobile app, it is necessary to cover two main operating systems — iOS and Android. Development for each OS can be too expensive for small business owners and they will have to make difficult choices. The way out of this situation is cross-platform development. Why? Because there’s no need to guess which platform targets prefer using — iOS or Android. Instead, you create just one app that runs seamlessly on both platforms.

• Maintenance. The application is a technical product that needs constant support. Upgrades should be carried out in a timely manner. Often, users need to personally update applications by downloading a new version, which is annoying. Regular bug-fixing for various devices (smartphones, tablets) and different operating systems might be a real problem. Plus, any update should be confirmed by the store where the application is placed.

• Suitable for businesses that provide interactive and personalized content (refers to all lifestyle and healthcare solutions), require regular app usage (for instance, to-do lists), rely on visual interaction and so on. For games, like Angry Birds, creating an app is also a wise choice.

Website

https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/kaggle-user-content/o/inbox%2F4686357%2Fd4f5bf1fdd0d0e65fae38c7251f56f13%2Fimage1.jpg?generation=1584955919738648&alt=media" alt="">

In order to be convenient for users of mobile devices, a website should be responsive. We want to make an emphasis on this since it is critically important. Most of the traffic on the Internet comes from mobile devices, so your website should be adaptable, or in other words, mobile-friendly. If a mobile user needs to zoom in all the necessary elements and text to see something, they will immediately quit your website.

On the other hand, a responsive website has the following benefits.

Pros

• Maintenance. Maintaining a website is less costly. When compared to applications where the user mu...

Abstract copyright UK Data Service and data collection copyright owner. Advanced Technology in the Lives of Disabled People, 2007-2008 assesses the use, application and role of advanced technologies in the lives of disabled people. Although disabled people are excited by the potential benefits of using new advanced technological devices at home, research has shown that one third of assistive devices are abandoned early and lie unused. This study aimed to explore why this happens, what the users actually need and how technology can rise to the challenges of flexibility and user choice. This study comprises 45 semi-structured interviews with people with a variety of different disabilities. In the study, 'disabled people' are people between the ages of 18 and 65 who have impairments (physical/sensory/learning difficulties/ mental health issues). 'Advanced technologies' are devices (often electronic) that assist the disabled person or improve functioning. These take many different forms, for example an automatic door opener can be attached to a closed circuit TV system, mobile telephones can act as universal pagers to alert the user to a number of environmental hazards, (for example, fire, gas escape). Further information can be found on ESRC MATILDAH project web page and the IDRIS research centre website. Additional information and a range of publications are available from the ESRC Award web page. Main Topics: The interviews covered the following themes:technology currently usedlearning challenges faced from new technologychoice and flexibilityabandonment of technologydevelopment of new technology in the future Quota sample Continuous sampling and interviewing of individuals as available. Face-to-face interview 2007 2008 ACCESS TO INFORMATI... AIDS FOR THE DISABLED AIDS FOR THE HEARIN... AIDS FOR THE SPEECH... AIDS FOR THE VISUAL... ANSWERPHONES ASSISTANCE ALARM SY... CARE IN THE COMMUNITY CARE OF THE DISABLED CHARITABLE ORGANIZA... CHAT ROOMS COMMUNICATION DISAB... COMPUTER SOFTWARE COMPUTERS CONGENITAL DISORDERS DEBILITATIVE ILLNESS DEPRESSION DISABILITIES DISABILITY DISCRIMI... DISABILITY DISCRIMI... DISABLED ACCESSIBILITY DISABLED FACILITIES DISABLED PERSONS DOMESTIC EQUIPMENT ... DOMESTIC RESPONSIBI... DVD PLAYERS England FIRE PROTECTION EQU... HEALTH CARE COSTS HEALTH PROFESSIONALS HEARING AIDS HEARING IMPAIRED PE... HEARING IMPAIRMENTS HOME HELP Health care service... INFORMAL CARE INFORMATION AND COM... INNOVATION INTERNET ACCESS INTERNET USE MENTALLY DISABLED P... MOBILE PHONES MOBILITY AIDS MOBILITY SCOOTERS NERVOUS SYSTEM DISE... OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY ONLINE SHOPPING PHYSICAL DISABILITIES PHYSICAL MOBILITY PHYSICALLY DISABLED... QUALITY OF LIFE SCIENTIFIC INNOVATION SENSORY IMPAIRMENTS SHELTERED EMPLOYMENT SICKNESS AND DISABI... SOCIAL MEDIA SOCIAL WELFARE SERV... SPEECH IMPAIRED PER... SPINAL DISORDERS STATE HEALTH SERVICES Science and technology Scotland Specific diseases Specific social ser... TELEPHONE HELP LINES TELEPHONES TELEVISION RECEIVERS TELEVISION SUBTITLES TRAUMA PSYCHOLOGICAL VISION IMPAIRMENTS VISUALLY IMPAIRED P... WALKING AIDS WHEELCHAIRS Wounds and injuries disorders and medic...

There are a total of 17 questions in the survey, addressing the following categories:Internet useMobile phone use (smartphones & basic voice/SMS phones)Awareness and use of WikipediaGeneral demographicsThe survey collected 2500 total responses, representing populations in 5 geographical regions served by 3 mobile Iraqi operators. 3 language choices (Arabic, English, Kurdish) were provided.Here are the main questions this survey was designed to answer. However, analyzing the full data set allows you to conduct more in-depth data explorations and gain meaningful insights beyond the points presented here.What is the actual number of people who use the internet?(Real-world behavior makes this difficult to measure from industry reports, since people might have access to the internet through school, friends, internet cafés, public Wifi, etc.)For internet users: What do people mostly use the internet for?For non-internet users: Why not use the internet?How many people use smartphones?Do people with smartphones use the internet from just Wifi? Or just cellular service?How many people think that they don’t use the internet, but still use Facebook or WhatsApp?How many people have heard of Wikipedia? What do they use it for? How often?If they have heard of Wikipedia, but aren’t using it, why not?Compared to previous phone surveys in other countries, the 2017 Iraq phone survey presented new questions.What are people’s awareness of other major internet brands in comparison to Wikipedia?Can people find online content in their preferred language?How does data cost impact internet use?

Digital Equity and Inclusion in Western Parkland CityThe Western Parkland City Digital Equity and Inclusion project shows the localised findings of targeted research aimed at benchmarking digital inclusion across the Western Parkland City. The index scores, depicted through a choropleth map, highlight specific gaps and priorities for improving overall digital inclusion and dimensions of Access, Ability and Affordability across each of the eight participating Council areas.AbilityDigital Ability is about our skill levels: what we are able do online, and our confidence in doing it. Having limited digital capability in the types of skills and knowledge needed to get online, operate functions and navigate sites with confidence and safety has been referred to the ‘second level’ digital divide. In measuring Digital Ability, the ADII draws upon the Internet Skills Scale (ISS) to focus on six skills domains. The ADII’s Digital Ability score measures the following skills components:Basic operational (i.e., downloading and opening files, connecting to the internet, and setting passwords)Advanced operational (i.e., saving to the cloud, determining what is safe to download, customising devices and connections, and adjusting privacy settings (e.g. downloading and opening files, connecting to the internet))Information navigation (i.e., searching and navigating, verifying trustworthy information, and managing third party data collection)Social (i.e., deciding what to share, how, and who with, managing and monitoring contacts, and communicating with others)Creative (i.e., editing, producing, and posting content, as well as having a broad understanding of the rules that may apply to these activities)Smart (i.e., connecting, operating, and managing smart devices and IoT technologies)AccessThe Digital Access dimension within the ADII is a measure of several interrelated components of internet usage that include intensity and frequency of use, types of devices, and use of fixed and mobile plans. It is well recognised that the quality of both fixed and mobile connectivity is problematic and underserviced in regional and remote areas – often due to intermittent and unreliable access to the nbn.AffordabilityAs connected technologies have developed and more people move online, some gaps in connectivity access have narrowed. However, for many people, particularly in areas with higher concentrations of low-income individuals and households, affordability can present significant barriers to achieving digital equity across the city. This includes being able to afford quality and reliable mobile and fixed broadband plans and the devices needed to connect online.For additional information click this linkSource: Data is sourced through a collaboration between Smart Places, Cities and Active Transport, Transport for NSW and The Parks, Sydney’s Parkland Councils, an alliance of the eight local government areas that comprise Western Parkland City as part of the Western Parkland City Digital Equity and Inclusion Insights Program. This is currently a one-off release. At this time we do not have plans to update this dataset regularly.

Sign Up for a free trial: https://rampedup.io/sign-up-%2F-log-in - 7 Days and 50 Credits to test our quality and accuracy.

These are the fields available within the RampedUp Global dataset.

CONTACT DATA: Personal Email Address - We manage over 115 million personal email addresses Professional Email - We manage over 200 million professional email addresses Home Address - We manage over 20 million home addresses Mobile Phones - 65 million direct lines to decision makers Social Profiles - Individual Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn Local Address - We manage 65M locations for local office mailers, event-based marketing or face-to-face sales calls.

JOB DATA: Job Title - Standardized titles for ease of use and selection Company Name - The Contact's current employer Job Function - The Company Department associated with the job role Title Level - The Level in the Company associated with the job role Job Start Date - Identify people new to their role as a potential buyer

EMPLOYER DATA: Websites - Company Website, Root Domain, or Full Domain Addresses - Standardized Address, City, Region, Postal Code, and Country Phone - E164 phone with country code Social Profiles - LinkedIn, CrunchBase, Facebook, and Twitter

FIRMOGRAPHIC DATA: Industry - 420 classifications for categorizing the company’s main field of business Sector - 20 classifications for categorizing company industries 4 Digit SIC Code - 239 classifications and their definitions 6 Digit NAICS - 452 classifications and their definitions Revenue - Estimated revenue and bands from 1M to over 1B Employee Size - Exact employee count and bands Email Open Scores - Aggregated data at the domain level showing relationships between email opens and corporate domains. IP Address -Company level IP Addresses associated to Domains from a DNS lookup

CONSUMER DATA: Education - Alma Mater, Degree, Graduation Date Skills - Accumulated Skills associated with work experience
Interests - Known interests of contact Connections - Number of social connections. Followers - Number of social followers

Download our data dictionary: https://rampedup.io/our-data

Abstract

Research ICT Africa (RIA) is a non-profit, public interest, research entity which undertakes research on how information and communication technologies are being accessed and used in African countries. The aim is to measure the impact on lifestyles and livelihoods of people and households and to understand how informal businesses can prosper through the use of ICTs. This research can facilitate informed policy-making for improved access, use and application of ICT for social development and economic growth. RIA collects both supply-side and demand-side data. On the demand-side nationally representative surveys are conducted on ICT use and demand in African countries. This survey dataset consists of data collected by household and business surveys conducted in 9 African countries in 2017 and 2018.

Geographic coverage

National coverage, the survey was conducted in Botswana, Cameroon, Ethiopia, Ghana, Kenya, Mozambique, Namibia, Nigeria, Rwanda, South Africa, Tanzania, Uganda, and Tunisia.

Analysis unit

Households and individuals

Universe

The data is nationally representative on a household and individual level for individuals 16 years of age or older.

Kind of data

Sample survey data [ssd]

Sampling procedure

The random sampling was performed in four steps for households and businesses, and five steps for individuals. • Step 1: The national census sample frames was split into urban and rural Enumerator areas (EAs). • Step 2: EAs were sampled for each stratum using probability proportional to size (PPS). • Step 3: For each EA two listings were compiled, one for households and one for businesses. The listings serve as sample frame for the simple random sections. • Step 4: 24 Households and 10 businesses were sampled using simple random sample for each selected EA. • Step 5: From all household members 15 years or older or visitors staying the night at the house one was randomly selected based on simple random sampling.

Mode of data collection

Face-to-face [f2f]

Research instrument

The survey questionnaire consisted of 16 modules. - Admin (enumerator completes it before Interviewing the Household) - Household Roster, list all household members 15 years or older - Household Roster, list all household members 14 years or younger - Household Attributes - Demographic Information - Income and Expenditure - Social Activities - Mobile Phone - No Mobile Phone - Mobile Money - Internet - No Internet Use - Social Media - No Social Media - Micro work - Household Attributes of Visitor

Abstract

How Couples Meet and Stay Together (HCMST) is a study of how Americans meet their spouses and romantic partners.

• The study is a nationally representative study of American adults.
• 4,002 adults responded to the survey, 3,009 of those had a spouse or main
  romantic partner.
• The study oversamples self-identified gay, lesbian, and bisexual adults
• Follow-up surveys were implemented one and two years after the main survey, to study couple dissolution rates. Version 3.0 of the dataset includes two follow- up surveys, waves 2 and 3.
• Waves 4 and 5 are provided as separate data files that can be linked back to the main file via variable caseid_new.

The study will provide answers to the following research questions:

1. Do traditional couples and nontraditional couples meet in the same way? What kinds of couples are more likely to have met online?
2. Have the most recent marriage cohorts (especially the traditional heterosexual same-race married couples) met in the same way their parents and grandparents did?
3. Does meeting online lead to greater or less couple stability?
4. How do the couple dissolution rates of nontraditional couples compare to the couple dissolution rates of more traditional same-race heterosexual couples?
5. How does the availability of civil union, domestic partnership or same-sex marriage rights affect couple stability for same-sex couples? This study will provide the first nationally representative data on the couple dissolution rates of same-sex couples.

Methodology

Universe:

The universe for the HCMST survey is English literate adults in the U.S.

**Unit of Analysis: **

Individual

**Type of data collection: **

Survey Data

**Time of data collection: **

Wave I, the main survey, was fielded between February 21 and April 2, 2009. Wave 2 was fielded March 12, 2010 to June 8, 2010. Wave 3 was fielded March 22, 2011 to August 29, 2011. Wave 4 was fielded between March and November of 2013. Wave 5 was fielded between November, 2014 and March, 2015. Dates for the background demographic surveys are described in the User's Guide, under documentation below.

Geographic coverage:

United States of America

Smallest geographic unit:

US region

**Sample description: **

The survey was carried out by survey firm Knowledge Networks (now called GfK). The survey respondents were recruited from an ongoing panel. Panelists are recruited via random digit dial phone survey. Survey questions were mostly answered online; some follow-up surveys were conducted by phone. Panelists who did not have internet access at home were given an internet access device (WebTV). For further information about how the Knowledge Networks hybrid phone-internet survey compares to other survey methodology, see attached documentation.

The dataset contains variables that are derived from several sources. There are variables from the Main Survey Instrument, there are variables generated from the investigators which were created after the Main Survey, and there are demographic background variables from Knowledge Networks which pre-date the Main Survey. Dates for main survey and for the prior background surveys are included in the dataset for each respondent. The source for each variable is identified in the codebook, and in notes appended within the dataset itself (notes may only be available for the Stata version of the dataset).

Respondents who had no spouse or main romantic partner were dropped from the Main Survey. Unpartnered respondents remain in the dataset, and demographic background variables are available for them.

**Sample response rate: **

Response to the main survey in 2009 from subjects, all of whom were already in the Knowledge Networks panel, was 71%. If we include the the prior initial Random Digit Dialing phone contact and agreement to join the Knowledge Networks panel (participation rate 32.6%), and the respondents’ completion of the initial demographic survey (56.8% completion), the composite overall response rate is a much lower .326*.568*.71= 13%. For further information on the calculation of response rates, and relevant citations, see the Note on Response Rates in the documentation. Response rates for the subsequent waves of the HCMST survey are simpler, using the denominator of people who completed wave 1 and who were eligible for follow-up. Response to wave 2 was 84.5%. Response rate to wave 3 was 72.9%. Response rate to wave 4 was 60.0%. Response rate to wave 5 was 46%. Response to wave 6 was 91.3%. Wave 6 was Internet only, so people who had left the GfK KnowledgePanel were not contacted.

**Weights: **

See "Notes on the Weights" in the Documentation section.

Usage

When you use the data, you agree to the following conditions:

1. I will not use the data to identify individuals.
2. I will not charge a fee for the data if I distribute it to others.
3. I will inform the contact person abo

Zugang zu und Nutzung von Online-Inhalten. Erfahrungen mit grenzüberschreitendem Zugang zu Online-Inhalten. Themen: Häufigkeit der folgenden Aktivitäten, um Personen in anderen EU-Ländern zu kontaktieren: Nutzung von Sofortnachrichtendiensten über das Internet, Versenden internationaler SMS, Tätigen von Telefonanrufen mit einem Festnetztelefon, Tätigen von Telefonanrufen mit einem Mobiltelefon, Tätigen von Telefonanrufen via Internetanwendungen, Tätigen von Telefonanrufen zu einer Telefonnummer via Internetanwendungen; unbegrenzte Anzahl von Minuten für international Anrufe innerhalb der EU in persönlichem Telefontarif; Wahrscheinlichkeit, aufgrund der gedeckelten Kosten mehr internationale Anrufe zu tätigen oder SMS innerhalb der EU zu versenden; Häufigkeit der Internetnutzung in den vergangenen zwölf Monaten, um folgende Inhalte zu streamen oder herunterzuladen: Musik, Sport, audiovisuelle Inhalte, E-Books oder digitale Bücher, Spiele; Art des Zugriffs auf die vorgenannten Typen von Inhalten: kostenlos ohne Registrierung, kostenlos mit Registrierung, Zahlung pro Download oder Stream, kostenpflichtiges Online-Abo; Gründe für die Entscheidung, für Inhalte zu bezahlen; Häufigkeit des Zugriffs auf Online-Inhalte über kostenloses oder über kostenpflichtiges Abo in einem anderen EU-Land seit April 2018; längster Nutzungszeitraum des Abos in einem anderen EU-Land seit April 2018; Einstellung zu den folgenden Aussagen im Hinblick auf die Nutzung eines kostenpflichtigen Abos in einem anderen EU-Land: funktionierte gut, Probleme mit Qualität oder Geschwindigkeit der Verbindung, andere technische Probleme, andere Auswahl an Inhalten im Vergleich zum Heimatland, Unerreichbarkeit des Dienstes nach einer bestimmten Zeit, Unerreichbarkeit des Dienstes; Wichtigkeit der Zugriffsmöglichkeit auf Online-Inhalte in einem anderen EU-Land bei der Auswahl eines kostenpflichtigen Abos; Häufigkeit von blockiertem Zugriff auf die vorgenannten Inhaltstypen; Versuche, auf die vorgenannten Inhaltstypen mit einem Online-Dienst für Nutzer in anderen EU-Ländern zuzugreifen; Gründe für den Zugriff über einen Online-Dienst für Nutzer in anderen EU-Ländern; Erfahrungen mit dem Online-Dienst: funktionierte gut, Zugriff auf den Dienst möglich ohne Zugriffsmöglichkeit auf die Inhalte, Ablehnung der gewünschten Zahlungsmethode, Umleitung auf die Version des Heimatlandes, Service nicht erreichbar, schlechte Servicequalität; Gründe, aus denen der vorgenannte Service nicht genutzt wurde; präferierter Inhaltstyp: Musik, Sport, audiovisuelle Inhalte, E-Books oder digitale Bücher, Spiele. Demographie: Besitz eines Mobiltelefons; Festnetztelefon im Haushalt; Anzahl aktiver Mobiltelefonnummern; Häufigkeit der Internetnutzung; Gründe, aus denen das Internet nicht genutzt wird; Bekanntsein der Möglichkeit des Zugangs ohne Zahlungsbeschränkungen zu Waren und Dienstleistungen von Unternehmen in anderen EU-Ländern; Bekanntsein der Möglichkeit der Nutzung eines kostenpflichtigen Abos für Online-Inhalte während eines zeitlich begrenzten Aufenthalts in einem anderen EU-Land; Alter; Geschlecht; Staatsangehörigkeit; Alter bei Beendigung der Ausbildung; Beruf; berufliche Stellung; Urbanisierungsgrad; Haushaltszusammensetzung und Haushaltsgröße; Region. Zusätzlich verkodet wurde: Land; Befragten-ID; Interviewmodus (Mobiltelefon oder Festnetz); Nationengruppe; Gewichtungsfaktor. Access to and use of online content. Experiences with cross-border access to online content. Topics: frequency of the following activities to contact people in another EU country: use instant internet messaging service, send international SMS, make international phone calls over a landline phone, make international phone calls over a mobile phone, make international calls via internet applications, make international calls to a phone number using internet applications; inclusion of unlimited number of minutes for international calls within the EU in personal telephone tariff; likelihood to make more international calls or send SMS within the EU due to limited costs; frequency in the last twelve months of using the internet to stream or download: music, sports, audio-visual content, e-books or digital books, games; kind of access to the aforementioned types of content: free of charge without registration, free of charge upon registration, pay per item, pay online subscription; reasons for decision to pay for content; frequency of accessing online content through free or paid subscription in another EU country since April 2018; longest period of time of using free or paid subscription in another EU country since April 2018; attitude towards the following statements with regard to using paid subscription in another EU country: worked well, problems with quality or speed of connection, other technical problems, different choice of content compared to own country, unavailability of service after a certain period, service inaccessible; importance of the ability to access content in another EU country when subscribing to a paid online content service; frequency of being blocked from accessing the above mentioned types of content; attempts to access or download the above mentioned types of content through an online service intended for users in another EU country; reasons for accessing the aforementioned online service; experiences with online service: worked well, service was accessible but not the content, desired payment method was refused, redirection to national version, service inaccessible, bad quality of service; reasons for not accessing the aforementioned online service; preferred kind of content: music, sports, audio-visual content, e-books or digital books, games. Demography: own a mobile phone and fixed (landline) phone; number of active mobile phone numbers; frequency of internet use; reasons for not using the internet; awareness of the possibility to access goods and services from companies based in other EU countries without payment restrictions; awareness of the possibility to access paid subscriptions for online content services when staying temporarily in another country; age; sex; nationality; age at end of education; occupation; professional position; type of community; household composition and household size; region. Additionally coded was: country; respondent ID; type of phone line; nation group; weighting factor.

When asked about "Attitudes towards the internet", most Chinese respondents pick "It is important to me to have mobile internet access in any place" as an answer. 50 percent did so in our online survey in 2025. Looking to gain valuable insights about users of internet providers worldwide? Check out our reports on consumers who use internet providers. These reports give readers a thorough picture of these customers, including their identities, preferences, opinions, and methods of communication.

From 2007, the Institute of Culture, Discourse and Communication (ICDC) at AUT University is conducting a long-term survey to track trends in Internet use, and to document the role and impact of the Internet in New Zealand society. The Internet has changed how business and trade deals are made; how schools and other academic institutions, councils, media and advertisers operate. The Internet also impacts on family interaction, the ways in which people form new friendships, and the communities to which people belong.The World Internet Project New Zealand is an extensive research project that aims to provide important information about the social, cultural, political and economic influence of the Internet and related digital technologies. As part of the World Internet Project, an international collaborative research effort, WIP NZ enables valid and rigorous comparison between New Zealand and 30 other countries around the world. Each partner country in WIP shares a set of 30 common questions.ICDC’s longitudinal survey includes a cross-section of participants aged 12 and up across New Zealand. A quota ensures that people of Māori, Pasifika and Asian descent, and the range of age-groups, are not underrepresented. The survey investigates Internet access and targets Internet users as well as non-users; who uses this technology and what they do online. It also considers offline activities such as how much time is spent with friends and family. Other questions address issues such as the effects of the Internet on language use and cultural development; the role of the Internet in accessing information or purchasing products; and how the Internet affects the educational and social development of New Zealand children. In addition to studying the impact of the Internet, the survey tracks the effectiveness of strategies to address issues such as the digital divide between rich and poor; urban and rural.Universe: People 12 years and over with a landline phone.Data Collection: Phoenix Research Ltd; Buzz Channel.Sampling: The sample design involved the following strata:Recontact of those in the 2011 (and earlier) samples who had indicated that they were prepared to consider answering a further wave of the WIP study. Of these, those who had provided an email address in a previous sample were invited to complete the survey online; the remainder were contacted using CATI telephone interviewing.A fresh CATI telephone sample drawn to provide adequate coverage (in conjunction with the recontact and online components) of the New Zealand populationFresh simple random sample of phone numbers.Three further simple random targeted booster samples of phone numbers within mesh blocks known to have:>30% Māori people;>30% Pasifika people;>30% Asian people.An online panel sample drawn to provide adequate coverage (in conjunction with the recontact and fresh telephone components) of the New Zealand population.An online sample of people without landlines, also members of the same panel.The sampling frames for the CATI telephone fresh simple random sample and the three targeted booster samples were calculated by using 2006 census data on the number of households with access to a telephone (using a database of phone numbers purchased from Yellow Ltd). This sampling strategy incorporates over-sampling of Māori, Pasifika and Asian people (often under-represented populations) to ensure adequate numbers of respondents in these cells.Representative coverage of geographic areas and gender was ensured by the setting of quota based on census data.Exclusions: non-users of the internet without landlines; non-English speakers; those refusing.Mode: Telephone interview.

When asked about "Attitudes towards the internet", most Australian respondents pick "It is important to me to have mobile internet access in any place" as an answer. 55 percent did so in our online survey in 2025. Looking to gain valuable insights about users of internet providers worldwide? Check out our reports on consumers who use internet providers. These reports give readers a thorough picture of these customers, including their identities, preferences, opinions, and methods of communication.