Note:

Because this dataset has been used in a competition, we had to hide some of the data to prepare the test dataset for the competition. Thus, in the previous version of the dataset, only train.csv file is existed.

Content

This dataset represents 10 different physical poses that can be used to distinguish 5 exercises. The exercises are Push-up, Pull-up, Sit-up, Jumping Jack and Squat. For every exercise, 2 different classes have been used to represent the terminal positions of that exercise (e.g., “up” and “down” positions for push-ups).

Collection Process

About 500 videos of people doing the exercises have been used in order to collect this data. The videos are from Countix Dataset that contain the YouTube links of several human activity videos. Using a simple Python script, the videos of 5 different physical exercises are downloaded. From every video, at least 2 frames are manually extracted. The extracted frames represent the terminal positions of the exercise.

Processing Data

For every frame, MediaPipe framework is used for applying pose estimation, which detects the human skeleton of the person in the frame. The landmark model in MediaPipe Pose predicts the location of 33 pose landmarks (see figure below). Visit Mediapipe Pose Classification page for more details.

https://mediapipe.dev/images/mobile/pose_tracking_full_body_landmarks.png" alt="33 pose landmarks">

This dataset was created by myself. This dataset contains videos of people doing workouts. The name of the existing workout corresponds to the name of the folder listed.

Context

This dataset was collected by me, along with my friends during my college days. The dataset mostly contains data from my friends and family members. This dataset has the survey data for the type of fitness practices that people follow.

Acknowledgements

This dataset wouldn't be here without the help of my friends. So, thanks to them!

What is in the dataset

1. Name of the person attending the survey
2. Gender of the person attending the survey
3. Age of the person attending the survey
4. How important is an exercise to you on the scale of 1 to 5
5. How do you describe your current level of fitness? - Perfect, Very good, Good, Average, Unfit
6. How often do you exercise? - Every day, 1 to 2 times a week, 2 to 3 times a week, 3 to 4 times a week, 5 to 6 times a week, never
7. What barriers, if any, prevent you from exercising more regularly? (Select all that applies) - I don't have enough time, I can't stay motivated, ill become too tired, I have an injury, I don't really enjoy exercising, I exercise regularly with no barriers
8. What forms of exercise do you currently participate in? (Select all that applies) - Walking or jogging, gym, swimming, yoga, Zumba dance, lifting weights, team sport, I don't really exercise
9. Do you exercise _? - Alone, With a friend, With a group, Within a class environment, I don't really exercise
10. What time of the day do you prefer to exercise? - Early morning, afternoon, evening
11. How long do you spend exercising per day? - 30 min, 1 hour, 2 hours, 3 hours and above, I don't really exercise
12. Would you say, you eat a healthy balanced diet? - Yes, No, Not always
13. What prevents you from eating a healthy balanced diet, if any? (Select all that applies) - Lack of time, Cost, Ease of access to fast food, Temptation, and cravings, I have a balanced diet
14. How healthy do you consider yourself on a scale of 1 to 5?
15. Have you recommended your friends to follow a fitness routine? - Yes, No
16. Have you ever purchased fitness equipment? - Yes, No
17. What motivates you to exercise? (Select all that applies) - I want to be fit, I want to increase muscle mass and strength, I want to lose weight, I want to be flexible, I want to relieve stress, I want to achieve a sporting goal, I'm not really interested in exercising.

A meticulously compiled dataset providing deep insights into the global fitness industry in 2025. This dataset covers high-demand topics such as the exponential growth of fitness clubs, emerging trends in boutique fitness studios, skyrocketing online fitness training statistics, the flourishing fitness equipment market, and changing consumer behavior and expenditure patterns in the fitness sector.

LifeSnaps Dataset Documentation

Ubiquitous self-tracking technologies have penetrated various aspects of our lives, from physical and mental health monitoring to fitness and entertainment. Yet, limited data exist on the association between in the wild large-scale physical activity patterns, sleep, stress, and overall health, and behavioral patterns and psychological measurements due to challenges in collecting and releasing such datasets, such as waning user engagement, privacy considerations, and diversity in data modalities. In this paper, we present the LifeSnaps dataset, a multi-modal, longitudinal, and geographically-distributed dataset, containing a plethora of anthropological data, collected unobtrusively for the total course of more than 4 months by n=71 participants, under the European H2020 RAIS project. LifeSnaps contains more than 35 different data types from second to daily granularity, totaling more than 71M rows of data. The participants contributed their data through numerous validated surveys, real-time ecological momentary assessments, and a Fitbit Sense smartwatch, and consented to make these data available openly to empower future research. We envision that releasing this large-scale dataset of multi-modal real-world data, will open novel research opportunities and potential applications in the fields of medical digital innovations, data privacy and valorization, mental and physical well-being, psychology and behavioral sciences, machine learning, and human-computer interaction.

The following instructions will get you started with the LifeSnaps dataset and are complementary to the original publication.

Data Import: Reading CSV

For ease of use, we provide CSV files containing Fitbit, SEMA, and survey data at daily and/or hourly granularity. You can read the files via any programming language. For example, in Python, you can read the files into a Pandas DataFrame with the pandas.read_csv() command.

Data Import: Setting up a MongoDB (Recommended)

To take full advantage of the LifeSnaps dataset, we recommend that you use the raw, complete data via importing the LifeSnaps MongoDB database.

To do so, open the terminal/command prompt and run the following command for each collection in the DB. Ensure you have MongoDB Database Tools installed from here.

For the Fitbit data, run the following:

mongorestore --host localhost:27017 -d rais_anonymized -c fitbit 

For the SEMA data, run the following:

mongorestore --host localhost:27017 -d rais_anonymized -c sema 

For surveys data, run the following:

mongorestore --host localhost:27017 -d rais_anonymized -c surveys 

If you have access control enabled, then you will need to add the --username and --password parameters to the above commands.

Data Availability

The MongoDB database contains three collections, fitbit, sema, and surveys, containing the Fitbit, SEMA3, and survey data, respectively. Similarly, the CSV files contain related information to these collections. Each document in any collection follows the format shown below:

{
  _id: 

This dataset is from the 2013 California Dietary Practices Survey of Adults. This survey has been discontinued. Adults were asked a series of eight questions about their physical activity practices in the last month. These questions were borrowed from the Behavior Risk Factor Surveillance System. Data displayed in this table represent California adults who met the aerobic recommendation for physical activity, as defined by the 2008 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans and Objectives 2.1 and 2.2 of Healthy People 2020.

The California Dietary Practices Surveys (CDPS) (now discontinued) was the most extensive dietary and physical activity assessment of adults 18 years and older in the state of California. CDPS was designed in 1989 and was administered biennially in odd years up through 2013. The CDPS was designed to monitor dietary trends, especially fruit and vegetable consumption, among California adults for evaluating their progress toward meeting the 2010 Dietary Guidelines for Americans and the Healthy People 2020 Objectives. For the data in this table, adults were asked a series of eight questions about their physical activity practices in the last month. Questions included: 1) During the past month, other than your regular job, did you participate in any physical activities or exercise such as running, calisthenics, golf, gardening or walking for exercise? 2) What type of physical activity or exercise did you spend the most time doing during the past month? 3) How many times per week or per month did you take part n this activity during the past month? 4) And when you took part in this activity, for how many minutes or hours did you usually keep at it? 5) During the past month, how many times per week or per month did you do physical activities or exercises to strengthen your muscles? Questions 2, 3, and 4 were repeated to collect a second activity. Data were collected using a list of participating CalFresh households and random digit dial, approximately 1,400-1,500 adults (ages 18 and over) were interviewed via phone survey between the months of June and October. Demographic data included gender, age, ethnicity, education level, income, physical activity level, overweight status, and food stamp eligibility status. Data were oversampled for low-income adults to provide greater sensitivity for analyzing trends among our target population.

Dataset relating to trial registration ISRCTN86152135

Objective: To establish whether vigorous-intensity exercise offers additional adipose-related health benefits and metabolic improvements compared to energy-matched moderate-intensity exercise. Methods: Thirty-eight sedentary overweight men (n=24) and postmenopausal women (n=14) aged 52 ± 5 years (mean ± SD) were prescribed a 3-week energy deficit (29302 kJ∙week-1) achieved by increased isocaloric moderate or vigorous-intensity exercise (+8372 kJ∙week-1) and simultaneous restricted energy intake (-20930 kJ∙week-1). Participants were randomly assigned to either an energy-matched vigorous (VIG; n=18) or moderate (MOD; n=20) intensity exercise group (five times per week at 70% or 50% maximal oxygen uptake, respectively). At baseline and follow-up, fasted blood samples and abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue biopsies were obtained and oral glucose tolerance tests conducted. Results: Body mass was reduced similarly in both groups (∆ 2.4 ± 1.1 kg and ∆ 2.4 ± 1.4 kg, respectively, P<0.05). Insulinaemic responses to a standard glucose load decreased similarly at follow-up relative to baseline in VIG (∆ 8.6 ± 15.4 nmol.120min.l-1) and MOD (∆ 5.4 ± 8.5 nmol.120min.l-1; P<0.05). Expression of SREBP-1c and FAS in adipose tissue was significantly down-regulated whereas expression of PDK4 and HSL was significantly up-regulated in both groups (P<0.05). Conclusions: When energy expenditure and energy deficit are matched, vigorous or moderate-intensity exercise combined with energy restriction provide broadly similar (positive) changes in metabolic control and adipose tissue gene expression.

Context

Below are my recorded workouts going back almost 3 years, using the Strong app. Nearly every single movement I have performed in the gym is recorded here with the exception of some warmup sets.

It would be interesting if anyone could find any useful patterns, surprisingly insights, or tips for getting stronger.

Content

Some things to keep in mind when analyzing the data:

• All units are in pounds.
• I generally followed a push-pull-legs-rest-repeat (PPL) split, although not necessarily in that order. As you will see, I followed a generally consistent program over this time but with deviations in reps/sets. Some days I had little energy due to illness, work, lack of sleep, or other events.
• Assume I weight 220LBs for body weight activities - dips, chin-ups, neutral grips chin-ups, and pull-ups. Any value you see for 'weight' in the dataset for these types of exercises can be thought of as added weight. For example, "70" would mean 220+70=290LBs.
• Dumbbell weights are the combined weight of both arms. For example, a dumbbell bench using 100s would be recorded as 200 pounds.
• Some of the same exercises may be entered with different names. For example, "Lateral Raise (Dumbbell)" and "Lateral Raise (Dumbbells)" are the same exercise just entered with different names.
• A proxy for one-rep-max can be found below. This may be useful in comparing strength levels over time from the same exercise but at different rep ranges. I encourage you to look at this from other angles as well. MAX = WEIGHT /(1.0278 - 0.0278*reps)
• Not every set or exercise is performed to the absolute maximum number of reps possible at that time. Sometimes I am fatigued from work, previous sets/workouts, plan on doing a higher volume day, or plan for a slight backoff day. I think this is common sense, but just stating so.
• Any dumbbell movement is generally recorded as the combined weight of both arms. For example, using a dumbbell bent press
• Anything that looks extreme is likely a typo. For example a lift in the 1000s of pounds is a typo.
• Warmups are generally not recorded.
• I wouldn't read too much into workout names as these are generally a close categorization of legs/push/pull.
• I rarely do cardio, but have managed to walk about 2.75 miles per day consistently over this time. Within the last 2 months, I have begun to bike approximately 30 miles per week.

Acknowledgements

Data is exported from the STRONG app, which is a great way to track your workouts.

Inspiration

I hope this dataset is of use to anyone interested in fitness. It would be awesome if this can be of use to others either in improving their own fitness, understanding the complexity of designing routines, and especially if any valuable insights can be generated to improve moving forward.

Note 08/07/13: Errata for regarding two variables incorrectly labelled with the same description in the Data Archive for the Health Survey for England - 2008 dataset deposited in the UK Data Archive Author: Health and Social Care Information Centre, Lifestyle Statistics Responsible Statistician: Paul Eastwood, Lifestyles Section Head Version: 1 Original date of publication: 17th December 2009 Date of errata: 11th June 2013 · Two physical activity variables (NSWA201 and WEPWA201) in the Health Survey for England - 2008 dataset deposited in the Data Archive had the same description of 'on weekdays in the last week have you done any cycling (not to school)?'. This is correct for NSWA201, but incorrect for WEPWA201 · The correct descriptions are: · NSWA201 - 'on weekdays in the last week have you done any cycling (not to school)?' · WEPWA201 - 'on weekends in the last week have you done any cycling (not to school)?' · This has been corrected and the amended dataset has been deposited in the UK Data Archive. NatCen Social Research and the Health and Social Care Information Centre apologise for any inconvenience this may have caused. Note 18/12/09: Please note that a slightly amended version of the Health Survey for England 2008 report, Volume 1, has been made available on this page on 18 December 2009. This was in order to correct the legend and title of figure 13G on page 321 of this volume. The NHS IC apologises for any inconvenience caused. The Health Survey for England is a series of annual surveys designed to measure health and health-related behaviours in adults and children living in private households in England. The survey was commissioned originally by the Department of Health and, from April 2005 by The NHS Information Centre for health and social care. The Health Survey for England has been designed and carried out since 1994 by the Joint Health Surveys Unit of the National Centre for Social Research (NatCen) and the Department of Epidemiology and Public Health at the University College London Medical School (UCL). The 2008 Health Survey for England focused on physical activity and fitness. Adults and children were asked to recall their physical activity over recent weeks, and objective measures of physical activity and fitness were also obtained. A secondary objective was to examine results on childhood obesity and other factors affecting health, including fruit and vegetable consumption, drinking and smoking.

IntroductionExercising at home is an accessible alternative to the gym, although it presents challenges such as low adherence, poor quality and difficulties in reaching set goals. Wearable technologies and the use of heart rate variability (HRV) make it possible to personalise workouts, optimise fitness and improve adherence. However, specific exercise recommendations based on these metrics are still lacking. This study evaluated the impact of HRV-based training using the Selftraining UMH app in an autonomous format versus a Personal Trainer-led approach.MethodsSeventy sedentary adults were divided into three groups: Autonomous (n = 18), Personal Trainer (n = 23), and Control (n = 29). After a two-week baseline HRV assessment, participants underwent an 11-week intervention, with pre- and post-tests on peak oxygen uptake, aerobic power, total test time, strength, and HRV.ResultsBoth intervention groups completed similar session numbers (23.3 vs. 24.5) and high-intensity workouts (13.7 vs. 14.6). Both groups improved significantly (p 

This report presents information on obesity, physical activity and diet drawn together from a variety of sources for England. More information can be found in the source publications which contain a wider range of data and analysis. Each section provides an overview of key findings, as well as providing links to relevant documents and sources. Some of the data have been published previously by NHS Digital. A data visualisation tool (link provided within the key facts) allows users to select obesity related hospital admissions data for any Local Authority (as contained in the data tables), along with time series data from 2013/14. Regional and national comparisons are also provided. The report includes information on: Obesity related hospital admissions, including obesity related bariatric surgery. Obesity prevalence. Physical activity levels. Walking and cycling rates. Prescriptions items for the treatment of obesity. Perception of weight and weight management. Food and drink purchases and expenditure. Fruit and vegetable consumption. Key facts cover the latest year of data available: Hospital admissions: 2018/19 Adult obesity: 2018 Childhood obesity: 2018/19 Adult physical activity: 12 months to November 2019 Children and young people's physical activity: 2018/19 academic year

Dataset

This dataset was created by Evan Leeds

Released under CC0: Public Domain

Contents

Note: DPH is updating and streamlining the COVID-19 cases, deaths, and testing data. As of 6/27/2022, the data will be published in four tables instead of twelve.

The COVID-19 Cases, Deaths, and Tests by Day dataset contains cases and test data by date of sample submission. The death data are by date of death. This dataset is updated daily and contains information back to the beginning of the pandemic. The data can be found at https://data.ct.gov/Health-and-Human-Services/COVID-19-Cases-Deaths-and-Tests-by-Day/g9vi-2ahj.

The COVID-19 State Metrics dataset contains over 93 columns of data. This dataset is updated daily and currently contains information starting June 21, 2022 to the present. The data can be found at https://data.ct.gov/Health-and-Human-Services/COVID-19-State-Level-Data/qmgw-5kp6 .

The COVID-19 County Metrics dataset contains 25 columns of data. This dataset is updated daily and currently contains information starting June 16, 2022 to the present. The data can be found at https://data.ct.gov/Health-and-Human-Services/COVID-19-County-Level-Data/ujiq-dy22 .

The COVID-19 Town Metrics dataset contains 16 columns of data. This dataset is updated daily and currently contains information starting June 16, 2022 to the present. The data can be found at https://data.ct.gov/Health-and-Human-Services/COVID-19-Town-Level-Data/icxw-cada . To protect confidentiality, if a town has fewer than 5 cases or positive NAAT tests over the past 7 days, those data will be suppressed.

This dataset includes a count and rate per 100,000 population for COVID-19 cases, a count of COVID-19 molecular diagnostic tests, and a percent positivity rate for tests among people living in community settings for the previous two-week period. Dates are based on date of specimen collection (cases and positivity).

A person is considered a new case only upon their first COVID-19 testing result because a case is defined as an instance or bout of illness. If they are tested again subsequently and are still positive, it still counts toward the test positivity metric but they are not considered another case.

Percent positivity is calculated as the number of positive tests among community residents conducted during the 14 days divided by the total number of positive and negative tests among community residents during the same period. If someone was tested more than once during that 14 day period, then those multiple test results (regardless of whether they were positive or negative) are included in the calculation.

These case and test counts do not include cases or tests among people residing in congregate settings, such as nursing homes, assisted living facilities, or correctional facilities.

These data are updated weekly and reflect the previous two full Sunday-Saturday (MMWR) weeks (https://wwwn.cdc.gov/nndss/document/MMWR_week_overview.pdf).

DPH note about change from 7-day to 14-day metrics: Prior to 10/15/2020, these metrics were calculated using a 7-day average rather than a 14-day average. The 7-day metrics are no longer being updated as of 10/15/2020 but the archived dataset can be accessed here: https://data.ct.gov/Health-and-Human-Services/COVID-19-case-rate-per-100-000-population-and-perc/s22x-83rd

As you know, we are learning more about COVID-19 all the time, including the best ways to measure COVID-19 activity in our communities. CT DPH has decided to shift to 14-day rates because these are more stable, particularly at the town level, as compared to 7-day rates. In addition, since the school indicators were initially published by DPH last summer, CDC has recommended 14-day rates and other states (e.g., Massachusetts) have started to implement 14-day metrics for monitoring COVID transmission as well.

With respect to geography, we also have learned that many people are looking at the town-level data to inform decision making, despite emphasis on the county-level metrics in the published addenda. This is understandable as there has been variation within counties in COVID-19 activity (for example, rates that are higher in one town than in most other towns in the county).

Additional notes: As of 11/5/2020, CT DPH has added antigen testing for SARS-CoV-2 to reported test counts in this dataset. The tests included in this dataset include both molecular and antigen datasets. Molecular tests reported include polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and nucleic acid amplicfication (NAAT) tests.

The population data used to calculate rates is based on the CT DPH population statistics for 2019, which is available online here: https://portal.ct.gov/DPH/Health-Information-Systems--Reporting/Population/Population-Statistics. Prior to 5/10/2021, the population estimates from 2018 were used.

Data suppression is applied when the rate is <5 cases per 100,000 or if there are <5 cases within the town. Information on why data suppression rules are applied can be found online here: https://www.cdc.gov/cancer/uscs/technical_notes/stat_methods/suppression.htm

Dataset

This dataset was created by Kasule Blessing Samuel

Released under CC0: Public Domain

Contents

This dataset relates to a manuscript on associations between sports measures and limitations in IADL among older persons. These data are part of the Dutch ELANE (Elderly And their Neighbourhood) study. Within ELANE, associations were studied between area characteristics and physical activity, independent living, and quality of life among community-dwelling people aged 65 years and older, living in Spijkenisse, a middle-sized town in the Rotterdam area.

The related article is (see also relations): Etman A, Pierik FH, Kamphuis CB, Burdorf A, van Lenthe FJ. The role of high-intensity physical exercsie in the prevention of disability among community-dwelling older people. BMC Geriatrics, 2016 Nov 9;16(1):183.

The ISAR-HP questionnaire is not available in the dataset due to copyright restrictions. A link to the online version can be found under 'Relations'.

2016-11-15
The related article is now included in the dataset:
Etman A, Pierik FH, Kamphuis CB, Burdorf A, van Lenthe FJ. The role of high-intensity physical exercsie in the prevention of disability among community-dwelling older people. BMC Geriatrics, 2016 Nov 9;16(1):183.

State and Local Public Health Departments in the United States Governmental public health departments are responsible for creating and maintaining conditions that keep people healthy. A local health department may be locally governed, part of a region or district, be an office or an administrative unit of the state health department, or a hybrid of these. Furthermore, each community has a unique "public health system" comprising individuals and public and private entities that are engaged in activities that affect the public's health. (Excerpted from the Operational Definition of a functional local health department, National Association of County and City Health Officials, November 2005) Please reference http://www.naccho.org/topics/infrastructure/accreditation/upload/OperationalDefinitionBrochure-2.pdf for more information. Facilities involved in direct patient care are intended to be excluded from this dataset; however, some of the entities represented in this dataset serve as both administrative and clinical locations. This dataset only includes the headquarters of Public Health Departments, not their satellite offices. Some health departments encompass multiple counties; therefore, not every county will be represented by an individual record. Also, some areas will appear to have over representation depending on the structure of the health departments in that particular region. Town health officers are included in Vermont and boards of health are included in Massachusetts. Both of these types of entities are elected or appointed to a term of office during which they make and enforce policies and regulations related to the protection of public health. Visiting nurses are represented in this dataset if they are contracted through the local government to fulfill the duties and responsibilities of the local health organization. Since many town health officers in Vermont work out of their personal homes, TechniGraphics represented these entities at the town hall. This is denoted in the [DIRECTIONS] field. Effort was made by TechniGraphics to verify whether or not each health department tracks statistics on communicable diseases. Records with "-DOD" appended to the end of the [NAME] value are located on a military base, as defined by the Defense Installation Spatial Data Infrastructure (DISDI) military installations and military range boundaries. "#" and "*" characters were automatically removed from standard HSIP fields populated by TechniGraphics. Double spaces were replaced by single spaces in these same fields. At the request of NGA, text fields in this dataset have been set to all upper case to facilitate consistent database engine search results. At the request of NGA, all diacritics (e.g., the German umlaut or the Spanish tilde) have been replaced with their closest equivalent English character to facilitate use with database systems that may not support diacritics. The currentness of this dataset is indicated by the [CONTDATE] field. Based on this field, the oldest record dates from 11/18/2009 and the newest record dates from 01/08/2010.

Analyst: Alexandra Loop Date: 12/02/2024

Business Task:

Question to be Answered : - What are trends in non-Bellabeat smart device usage? - What do these trends suggest for Bellabeat customers? - How could these trends help influence Bellabeat marketing strategy?

Description of Data Sources:

Data Set to be studied: FitBit Fitness Tracker Data: Pattern Recognition with tracker data: Improve Your Overall Health

Data privacy: Data was sourced from a public dataset available on Kaggle. Information has been anonymized prior to being posted online.

Bias: Due to the degree of anonymity in this study, the only demographic data available in this study is weight, and other cultural differences or lifestyle requirements cannot be accounted for. The sample size is quite small. The time period of the study is only a month so the observer effect could conceivably still be influencing the sample groups. We also have no information on the weather in the region studied. April and May are very variable months in terms of accessible outdoor activities.

Process:

Cleaning Process: After going through the data to find duplicates, whitespace, and nulls, I have determined that this set of data has been well-cleaned and already aggregated into several reasonably sized spreadsheets.

Trim: No issues found

Consistent length ID: No issues found

Irrelevant columns: In WLI_M the fat column is not consistently filled in so it is not productive to use it in analysis Sedentary_active_distance was mostly filled with nulls and could confuse the data I have removed the columns

Irrelevant Rows: 77 rows in daily_Activity_merged had 0s across the board. As there is little chance that someone would take zero steps I decided to interpret these days as ones where people did not put on the fitbit. As such they are irrelevant rows. Removed 77 columns. 85 rows in daily_intensities_merged registered 0 minutes of sedentary activity, which I do not believe to be possible. Row 241 logged 2 minutes of sedentary activity. I have determined it to be unusable. Row 322 likewise does not add up to a day’s minutes and has been deleted. Removed 85 columns 7 rows had 1440 sedentary minutes, which I have determined to be time on but not used. Implication of the presence noted.

Scientifically debunked information: BMI as a measurement has been determined to be problematic on many lines, it misrepresents non-white people who have different healthy body types, does not account for muscle mass or scoliosis, has been known to change definitions in accordance with business interests rather than health data, and was never meant to be used as a measure of individual health. I have removed the BMI column from the Weight Log Info chart.

Cleaning Process 1: I have elected to see what can be found in the data as it was organized by the providers first.
Cleaning Process 2: I calculated and removed rows where the participants did not put on the fitbit. These rows were removed, and the implications of their presence have been noted. Found Averages, Minimum, and Maximum Values of Steps, distance, types of active minutes, and calories. Found the sum of all kinds of minutes documented to check for inconsistencies. Found the difference between total minutes and a full 1440 minutes. I tried to make a pie chart to convey the average minutes of activity, and so created a duplicate dataset to trim down and remove misleading data caused by different inputs.

Analysis:

Observations: On average, the participants do not seem interested in moderate physical activity as it was the category with the fewest number of active minutes. Perhaps advertise the effectiveness of low impact workouts. Very few participants volunteered their weights, but none of them lost weight. The person with the highest weight volunteered it only once near the beginning. Given evidence from the Health At Every Size movement, we cannot deny the possibility that having to be weight conscious could have had negative effects on this individual. I would suggest that weight would be a counterproductive focus for our marketing campaign as it would make heavier people less likely to want to participate, and any claims of weight loss would be statistically unfounded, and open us up to false advertising lawsuits. Fully half of the participants had days where they did not put on their fitbit at all during the day. For a total number of 77-84 lost days of data, meaning that on average participants who did not wear their fitbit daily lost 5 days of data, though of course some lost significantly more. I would suggest focusing on creating a biometric tracker that is comfortable and rarely needs to be charged so that people will gain more reliable resources from it. 400 full days of data are recorded, meaning that the participants did not take the device off to sleep, shower, or swim. 280 more have 16...

The Active Lives Children and Young People Survey, which was established in September 2017, provides a world-leading approach to gathering data on how children engage with sport and physical activity. This school-based survey is the first and largest established physical activity survey with children and young people in England. It gives anyone working with children aged 5-16 key insight to help understand children's attitudes and behaviours around sport and physical activity. The results will shape and influence local decision-making as well as inform government policy on the PE and Sport Premium, Childhood Obesity Plan and other cross-departmental programmes. More general information about the study can be found on the Sport England Active Lives Survey webpage and the Active Lives Online website, including reports and data tables.

The Active Lives Children and Young People Survey, 2017-2018 commenced during school academic year 2017 / 2018. It ran from autumn term 2017 to summer term 2018 and excludes school holidays. The survey identifies how participation varies across different activities and sports, by regions of England, between school types and terms, and between different demographic groups in the population. The survey measures levels of activity (active, fairly active and less active), attitudes towards sport and physical activity, swimming capability, the proportion of children and young people that volunteer in sport, sports spectating, and wellbeing measures such as happiness and life satisfaction. The questionnaire was designed to enable analysis of the findings by a broad range of variables, such as gender, family affluence and school year.

The following datasets are available:

1) Main dataset includes responses from children and young people from school years 3 to 11, as well as responses from parents of children in years 1-2. The parents of children in years 1-2 provide behavioural answers about their child's activity levels, they do not provide attitudinal information. Using this main dataset, full analyses can be carried out into sports and physical activity participation, levels of activity, volunteering (years 5 to 11), etc. Weighting is required when using this dataset (wt_gross / wt_set1.csplan).

2) Year 1-2 pupil dataset includes responses from children in school years 1-2 directly, providing their attitudinal responses (e.g. whether they like playing sport and find it easy). Analysis can be carried out into feelings towards swimming, enjoyment for being active, happiness etc. Weighting is required when using this dataset (wt_gross / wt_set1.csplan).

3) Teacher dataset includes responses from the teachers at schools selected for the survey. Analysis can be carried out into school facilities available, length of PE lessons, whether swimming lessons are offered, etc. Weighting was formerly not available, however, as Sport England have started to publish the Teacher data, from December 2023 we decide to apply weighting to the data. The Teacher dataset now includes weighting by applying the ‘wt_teacher’ weighting variable.

For further information about the variables available for analysis, and the relevant school years asked survey questions, please see the supporting documentation. Please read the documentation before using the datasets.

Latest edition information

For the second edition (January 2024), the Teacher dataset now includes a weighting variable (‘wt_teacher’). Previously, weighting was not available for these data.

Dataset from "Time-restricted eating and exercise training before and during pregnancy for people with increased risk of gestational diabetes: the BEFORE THE BEGINNING randomised controlled trial".

65 People –15,204 Videos of Sports and Fitness Video Data. The data collection scene is indoor scenes. The race distribution is Asian, black and Caucasian; the age distribution is young and middle-aged people. The collection device is IR and RGB cameras. The dataset diversity includes different races, different age groups, different shooting angles, different collection distances, different human body orientations, different costumes and various fitness actions. The data can be used for tasks such as human behavior recognition and human segmentation in fitness scenes.