Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This dataset, compiled by NREL using data from ABB, the Velocity Suite (http://energymarketintel.com/) and the U.S. Energy Information Administration dataset 861 (http://www.eia.gov/electricity/data/eia861/), provides average residential, commercial and industrial electricity rates with likely zip codes for both investor owned utilities (IOU) and non-investor owned utilities. Note: the files include average rates for each utility (not average rates per zip code), but not the detailed rate structure data found in the OpenEI U.S. Utility Rate Database (https://openei.org/apps/USURDB/).
In 2022, PG&E and Avangrid were the investor-owned electric utilities with the highest decarbonization index score in the United States, with overall scores of 4.6 and 4.2 points. They were closely followed by Public Service Enterprise Group (PSEG), which scored 4.1 that year. The U.S.'s power sector carbon intensity stood at 760 pounds of CO2 per megawatt-hour in 2023.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Analysis of ‘U.S. Electric Utility Companies and Rates: Look-up by Zipcode (2014)’ provided by Analyst-2 (analyst-2.ai), based on source dataset retrieved from https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/4a0b165d-1d44-4f58-b359-e4c1df9d33e7 on 28 January 2022.
--- Dataset description provided by original source is as follows ---
This dataset, compiled by NREL using data from ABB, the Velocity Suite and the U.S. Energy Information Administration dataset 861, provides average residential, commercial and industrial electricity rates by zip code for both investor owned utilities (IOU) and non-investor owned utilities. Note: the file includes average rates for each utility, but not the detailed rate structure data found in the OpenEI U.S. Utility Rate Database.
--- Original source retains full ownership of the source dataset ---
https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
This dataset provides historical stock market performance data for specific companies. It enables users to analyze and understand the past trends and fluctuations in stock prices over time. This information can be utilized for various purposes such as investment analysis, financial research, and market trend forecasting.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Analysis of ‘U.S. Electric Utility Companies and Rates: Look-up by Zipcode (2013)’ provided by Analyst-2 (analyst-2.ai), based on source dataset retrieved from https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/ec3aadad-1753-4b00-a73a-388cdb62c3e3 on 28 January 2022.
--- Dataset description provided by original source is as follows ---
This dataset, compiled by NREL using data from ABB, the Velocity Suite and the U.S. Energy Information Administration dataset 861, provides average residential, commercial and industrial electricity rates by zip code for both investor owned utilities (IOU) and non-investor owned utilities. Note: the file includes average rates for each utility, but not the detailed rate structure data found in the OpenEI U.S. Utility Rate Database.
--- Original source retains full ownership of the source dataset ---
Comprehensive dataset of 19,952 Water utility companies in United States as of June, 2025. Includes verified contact information (email, phone), geocoded addresses, customer ratings, reviews, business categories, and operational details. Perfect for market research, lead generation, competitive analysis, and business intelligence. Download a complimentary sample to evaluate data quality and completeness.
https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
By US Open Data Portal, data.gov [source]
This dataset contains in-depth facility-level information on industrial combustion energy use in the United States. It provides an essential resource for understanding consumption patterns across different sectors and industries, as reported by large emitters (>25,000 metric tons CO2e per year) under the U.S. EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (GHGRP). Our records have been calculated using EPA default emissions factors and contain data on fuel type, location (latitude, longitude), combustion unit type and energy end use classified by manufacturing NAICS code. Additionally, our dataset reveals valuable insight into the thermal spectrum of low-temperature energy use from a 2010 Energy Information Administration Manufacturing Energy Consumption Survey (MECS). This information is critical to assessing industrial trends of energy consumption in manufacturing sectors and can serve as an informative baseline for efficient or renewable alternative plans of operation at these facilities. With this dataset you're just a few clicks away from analyzing research questions related to consumption levels across industries, waste issues associated with unconstrained fossil fuel burning practices and their environmental impacts
For more datasets, click here.
- 🚨 Your notebook can be here! 🚨!
This dataset provides detailed information on industrial combustion energy end use in the United States. Knowing how certain industries use fuel can be valuable for those interested in reducing energy consumption and its associated environmental impacts.
To make the most out of this dataset, users should first become familiar with what's included by looking at the columns and their respective definitions. After becoming familiar with the data, users should start to explore areas of interest such as Fuel Type, Report Year, Primary NAICS Code, Emissions Indicators etc. The more granular and specific details you can focus on will help build a stronger analysis from which to draw conclusions from your data set.
Next steps could include filtering your data set down by region or end user type (such as direct related processes or indirect support activities). Segmenting your data set further can allow you to identify trends between fuel type used in different regions or compare emissions indicators between different processes within manufacturing industries etc. By taking a closer look through this lens you may be able to find valuable insights that can help inform better decision making when it comes to reducing energy consumption throughout industry in both public and private sectors alike.
if exploring specific trends within industry is not something that’s of particular interest to you but rather understanding general patterns among large emitters across regions then it may be beneficial for your analysis to group like-data together and take averages over larger samples which better represent total production across an area or multiple states (timeline varies depending on needs). This approach could open up new possibilities for exploring correlations between economic productivity metrics compared against industrial energy use over periods of time which could lead towards more formal investigations about where efforts are being made towards improved resource efficiency standards among certain industries/areas of production compared against other more inefficient sectors/regionsetc — all from what's already present here!
By leveraging the information provided within this dataset users have access to many opportunities for finding all sorts of interesting yet practical insights which can have important impacts far beyond understanding just another singular statistic alone; so happy digging!
- Analyzing the trends in combustion energy uses by region across different industries.
- Predicting the potential of transitioning to clean and renewable sources of energy considering the current end-uses and their magnitude based on this data.
- Creating an interactive web map application to visualize multiple industrial sites, including their energy sources and emissions data from this dataset combined with other sources (EPA’s GHGRP, MECS survey, etc)
If you use this dataset in your research, please credit the original authors. Data Source
**License: [CC0 1.0 Universal (CC0 1.0) - Public Domain Dedication](https://creativecommons...
Comprehensive dataset of 9 Housing utility companies in California, United States as of July, 2025. Includes verified contact information (email, phone), geocoded addresses, customer ratings, reviews, business categories, and operational details. Perfect for market research, lead generation, competitive analysis, and business intelligence. Download a complimentary sample to evaluate data quality and completeness.
Comprehensive dataset of 1 Housing utility companies in Kansas, United States as of July, 2025. Includes verified contact information (email, phone), geocoded addresses, customer ratings, reviews, business categories, and operational details. Perfect for market research, lead generation, competitive analysis, and business intelligence. Download a complimentary sample to evaluate data quality and completeness.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
US: Time Required to Get Electricity data was reported at 89.600 Day in 2017. This stayed constant from the previous number of 89.600 Day for 2016. US: Time Required to Get Electricity data is updated yearly, averaging 89.600 Day from Dec 2013 (Median) to 2017, with 5 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 89.600 Day in 2017 and a record low of 89.600 Day in 2017. US: Time Required to Get Electricity data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s United States – Table US.World Bank.WDI: Company Statistics. Time required to get electricity is the number of days to obtain a permanent electricity connection. The measure captures the median duration that the electricity utility and experts indicate is necessary in practice, rather than required by law, to complete a procedure.; ; World Bank, Doing Business project (http://www.doingbusiness.org/).; Unweighted average; Data are presented for the survey year instead of publication year.
U.S. Government Workshttps://www.usa.gov/government-works
License information was derived automatically
Metering for various energy companies broken down by month and state, since 2011, from the US Energy Information Administration (USEIA).
https://www.mordorintelligence.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.mordorintelligence.com/privacy-policy
The United States Data Center Power Market is Segmented by Component (Electrical Solutions, Services), Data Center Type (Hyperscaler/Cloud Service Providers, Colocation Providers, and More), Data Center Size (Small Size Data Centers, Medium Size Data Centers, Large Size Data Centers and More), Tier Type (Tier I and II, Tier III, Tier IV). The Market Forecasts are Provided in Terms of Value (USD)
📈 Daily Historical Stock Price Data for American Electric Power Company, Inc. (1962–2025)
A clean, ready-to-use dataset containing daily stock prices for American Electric Power Company, Inc. from 1962-01-02 to 2025-05-28. This dataset is ideal for use in financial analysis, algorithmic trading, machine learning, and academic research.
🗂️ Dataset Overview
Company: American Electric Power Company, Inc. Ticker Symbol: AEP Date Range: 1962-01-02 to 2025-05-28 Frequency:… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/khaledxbenali/daily-historical-stock-price-data-for-american-electric-power-company-inc-19622025.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
PUDL v2025.2.0 Data Release
This is our regular quarterly release for 2025Q1. It includes updates to all the datasets that are published with quarterly or higher frequency, plus initial verisons of a few new data sources that have been in the works for a while.
One major change this quarter is that we are now publishing all processed PUDL data as Apache Parquet files, alongside our existing SQLite databases. See Data Access for more on how to access these outputs.
Some potentially breaking changes to be aware of:
In the EIA Form 930 – Hourly and Daily Balancing Authority Operations Report a number of new energy sources have been added, and some old energy sources have been split into more granular categories. See Changes in energy source granularity over time.
We are now running the EPA’s CAMD to EIA unit crosswalk code for each individual year starting from 2018, rather than just 2018 and 2021, resulting in more connections between these two datasets and changes to some sub-plant IDs. See the note below for more details.
Many thanks to the organizations who make these regular updates possible! Especially GridLab, RMI, and the ZERO Lab at Princeton University. If you rely on PUDL and would like to help ensure that the data keeps flowing, please consider joining them as a PUDL Sustainer, as we are still fundraising for 2025.
New Data
EIA 176
Add a couple of semi-transformed interim EIA-176 (natural gas sources and dispositions) tables. They aren’t yet being written to the database, but are one step closer. See #3555 and PRs #3590, #3978. Thanks to @davidmudrauskas for moving this dataset forward.
Extracted these interim tables up through the latest 2023 data release. See #4002 and #4004.
EIA 860
Added EIA 860 Multifuel table. See #3438 and #3946.
FERC 1
Added three new output tables containing granular utility accounting data. See #4057, #3642 and the table descriptions in the data dictionary:
out_ferc1_yearly_detailed_income_statements
out_ferc1_yearly_detailed_balance_sheet_assets
out_ferc1_yearly_detailed_balance_sheet_liabilities
SEC Form 10-K Parent-Subsidiary Ownership
We have added some new tables describing the parent-subsidiary company ownership relationships reported in the SEC’s Form 10-K, Exhibit 21 “Subsidiaries of the Registrant”. Where possible these tables link the SEC filers or their subsidiary companies to the corresponding EIA utilities. This work was funded by a grant from the Mozilla Foundation. Most of the ML models and data preparation took place in the mozilla-sec-eia repository separate from the main PUDL ETL, as it requires processing hundreds of thousands of PDFs and the deployment of some ML experiment tracking infrastructure. The new tables are handed off as nearly finished products to the PUDL ETL pipeline. Note that these are preliminary, experimental data products and are known to be incomplete and to contain errors. Extracting data tables from unstructured PDFs and the SEC to EIA record linkage are necessarily probabalistic processes.
See PRs #4026, #4031, #4035, #4046, #4048, #4050 and check out the table descriptions in the PUDL data dictionary:
out_sec10k_parents_and_subsidiaries
core_sec10k_quarterly_filings
core_sec10k_quarterly_exhibit_21_company_ownership
core_sec10k_quarterly_company_information
Expanded Data Coverage
EPA CEMS
Added 2024 Q4 of CEMS data. See #4041 and #4052.
EPA CAMD EIA Crosswalk
In the past, the crosswalk in PUDL has used the EPA’s published crosswalk (run with 2018 data), and an additional crosswalk we ran with 2021 EIA 860 data. To ensure that the crosswalk reflects updates in both EIA and EPA data, we re-ran the EPA R code which generates the EPA CAMD EIA crosswalk with 4 new years of data: 2019, 2020, 2022 and 2023. Re-running the crosswalk pulls the latest data from the CAMD FACT API, which results in some changes to the generator and unit IDs reported on the EPA side of the crosswalk, which feeds into the creation of core_epa_assn_eia_epacamd.
The changes only result in the addition of new units and generators in the EPA data, with no changes to matches at the plant level. However, the updates to generator and unit IDs have resulted in changes to the subplant IDs - some EIA boilers and generators which previously had no matches to EPA data have now been matched to EPA unit data, resulting in an overall reduction in the number of rows in the core_epa_assn_eia_epacamd_subplant_ids table. See issues #4039 and PR #4056 for a discussion of the changes observed in the course of this update.
EIA 860M
Added EIA 860m through December 2024. See #4038 and #4047.
EIA 923
Added EIA 923 monthly data through September 2024. See #4038 and #4047.
EIA Bulk Electricity Data
Updated the EIA Bulk Electricity data to include data published up through 2024-11-01. See #4042 and PR #4051.
EIA 930
Updated the EIA 930 data to include data published up through the beginning of February 2025. See #4040 and PR #4054. 10 new energy sources were added and 3 were retired; see Changes in energy source granularity over time for more information.
Bug Fixes
Fix an accidentally swapped set of starting balance / ending balance column rename parameters in the pre-2021 DBF derived data that feeds into core_ferc1_yearly_other_regulatory_liabilities_sched278. See issue #3952 and PRs #3969, #3979. Thanks to @yolandazzz13 for making this fix.
Added preliminary data validation checks for several FERC 1 tables that were missing it #3860.
Fix spelling of Lake Huron and Lake Saint Clair in out_vcerare_hourly_available_capacity_factor and related tables. See issue #4007 and PR #4029.
Quality of Life Improvements
We added a sources parameter to pudl.metadata.classes.DataSource.from_id() in order to make it possible to use the pudl-archiver repository to archive datasets that won’t necessarily be ingested into PUDL. See this PUDL archiver issue and PRs #4003 and #4013.
Other PUDL v2025.2.0 Resources
PUDL v2025.2.0 Data Dictionary
PUDL v2025.2.0 Documentation
PUDL in the AWS Open Data Registry
PUDL v2025.2.0 in a free, public AWS S3 bucket: s3://pudl.catalyst.coop/v2025.2.0/
PUDL v2025.2.0 in a requester-pays GCS bucket: gs://pudl.catalyst.coop/v2025.2.0/
Zenodo archive of the PUDL GitHub repo for this release
PUDL v2025.2.0 release on GitHub
PUDL v2025.2.0 package in the Python Package Index (PyPI)
Contact Us
If you're using PUDL, we would love to hear from you! Even if it's just a note to let us know that you exist, and how you're using the software or data. Here's a bunch of different ways to get in touch:
Follow us on GitHub
Use the PUDL Github issue tracker to let us know about any bugs or data issues you encounter
GitHub Discussions is where we provide user support.
Watch our GitHub Project to see what we're working on.
Email us at hello@catalyst.coop for private communications.
On Mastodon: @CatalystCoop@mastodon.energy
On BlueSky: @catalyst.coop
On Twitter: @CatalystCoop
Connect with us on LinkedIn
Play with our data and notebooks on Kaggle
Combine our data with ML models on HuggingFace
Learn more about us on our website: https://catalyst.coop
Subscribe to our announcements list for email updates.
Subscribers can find out export and import data of 23 countries by HS code or product’s name. This demo is helpful for market analysis.
Google’s energy consumption has increased over the last few years, reaching 25.9 terawatt hours in 2023, up from 12.8 terawatt hours in 2019. The company has made efforts to make its data centers more efficient through customized high-performance servers, using smart temperature and lighting, advanced cooling techniques, and machine learning. Datacenters and energy Through its operations, Google pursues a more sustainable impact on the environment by creating efficient data centers that use less energy than the average, transitioning towards renewable energy, creating sustainable workplaces, and providing its users with the technological means towards a cleaner future for the future generations. Through its efficient data centers, Google has also managed to divert waste from its operations away from landfills. Reducing Google’s carbon footprint Google’s clean energy efforts is also related to their efforts to reduce their carbon footprint. Since their commitment to using 100 percent renewable energy, the company has met their targets largely through solar and wind energy power purchase agreements and buying renewable power from utilities. Google is one of the largest corporate purchasers of renewable energy in the world.
https://www.technavio.com/content/privacy-noticehttps://www.technavio.com/content/privacy-notice
GIS In Utility Industry Market Size 2025-2029
The gis in utility industry market size is forecast to increase by USD 3.55 billion, at a CAGR of 19.8% between 2024 and 2029.
The utility industry's growing adoption of Geographic Information Systems (GIS) is driven by the increasing need for efficient and effective infrastructure management. GIS solutions enable utility companies to visualize, analyze, and manage their assets and networks more effectively, leading to improved operational efficiency and customer service. A notable trend in this market is the expanding application of GIS for water management, as utilities seek to optimize water distribution and reduce non-revenue water losses. However, the utility GIS market faces challenges from open-source GIS software, which can offer cost-effective alternatives to proprietary solutions. These open-source options may limit the functionality and support available to users, necessitating careful consideration when choosing a GIS solution. To capitalize on market opportunities and navigate these challenges, utility companies must assess their specific needs and evaluate the trade-offs between cost, functionality, and support when selecting a GIS provider. Effective strategic planning and operational execution will be crucial for success in this dynamic market.
What will be the Size of the GIS In Utility Industry Market during the forecast period?
Explore in-depth regional segment analysis with market size data - historical 2019-2023 and forecasts 2025-2029 - in the full report.
Request Free SampleThe Global Utilities Industry Market for Geographic Information Systems (GIS) continues to evolve, driven by the increasing demand for advanced data management and analysis solutions. GIS services play a crucial role in utility infrastructure management, enabling asset management, data integration, project management, demand forecasting, data modeling, data analytics, grid modernization, data security, field data capture, outage management, and spatial analysis. These applications are not static but rather continuously unfolding, with new patterns emerging in areas such as energy efficiency, smart grid technologies, renewable energy integration, network optimization, and transmission lines. Spatial statistics, data privacy, geospatial databases, and remote sensing are integral components of this evolving landscape, ensuring the effective management of utility infrastructure.
Moreover, the adoption of mobile GIS, infrastructure planning, customer service, asset lifecycle management, metering systems, regulatory compliance, GIS data management, route planning, environmental impact assessment, mapping software, GIS consulting, GIS training, smart metering, workforce management, location intelligence, aerial imagery, construction management, data visualization, operations and maintenance, GIS implementation, and IoT sensors is transforming the industry. The integration of these technologies and services facilitates efficient utility infrastructure management, enhancing network performance, improving customer service, and ensuring regulatory compliance. The ongoing evolution of the utilities industry market for GIS reflects the dynamic nature of the sector, with continuous innovation and adaptation to meet the changing needs of utility providers and consumers.
How is this GIS In Utility Industry Industry segmented?
The gis in utility industry industry research report provides comprehensive data (region-wise segment analysis), with forecasts and estimates in 'USD million' for the period 2025-2029, as well as historical data from 2019-2023 for the following segments. ProductSoftwareDataServicesDeploymentOn-premisesCloudGeographyNorth AmericaUSCanadaEuropeFranceGermanyRussiaMiddle East and AfricaUAEAPACChinaIndiaJapanSouth AmericaBrazilRest of World (ROW).
By Product Insights
The software segment is estimated to witness significant growth during the forecast period.In the utility industry, Geographic Information Systems (GIS) play a pivotal role in optimizing operations and managing infrastructure. Utilities, including electricity, gas, water, and telecommunications providers, utilize GIS software for asset management, infrastructure planning, network performance monitoring, and informed decision-making. The GIS software segment in the utility industry encompasses various solutions, starting with fundamental GIS software that manages and analyzes geographical data. Additionally, utility companies leverage specialized software for field data collection, energy efficiency, smart grid technologies, distribution grid design, renewable energy integration, network optimization, transmission lines, spatial statistics, data privacy, geospatial databases, GIS services, project management, demand forecasting, data modeling, data analytics, grid modernization, data security, field data capture, outage ma
📈 Daily Historical Stock Price Data for Chubu Electric Power Company, Incorporated (2000–2025)
A clean, ready-to-use dataset containing daily stock prices for Chubu Electric Power Company, Incorporated from 2000-01-04 to 2025-05-28. This dataset is ideal for use in financial analysis, algorithmic trading, machine learning, and academic research.
🗂️ Dataset Overview
Company: Chubu Electric Power Company, Incorporated Ticker Symbol: 9502.T Date Range: 2000-01-04 to… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/khaledxbenali/daily-historical-stock-price-data-for-chubu-electric-power-company-incorporated-20002025.
Comprehensive dataset of 22 Solar energy companies in Delaware, United States as of June, 2025. Includes verified contact information (email, phone), geocoded addresses, customer ratings, reviews, business categories, and operational details. Perfect for market research, lead generation, competitive analysis, and business intelligence. Download a complimentary sample to evaluate data quality and completeness.
https://www.mordorintelligence.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.mordorintelligence.com/privacy-policy
The Report On Big Data Analytics Market in the Energy Sector is Segmented by Application (Grip Operations, Smart Metering, Asset, And Workforce Management) and Geography (North America, Europe, Asia-pacific, Latin America, And Middle East and Africa). The Market Sizes and Forecasts are Provided in Terms of Value (USD) for all the Above Segments.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This dataset, compiled by NREL using data from ABB, the Velocity Suite (http://energymarketintel.com/) and the U.S. Energy Information Administration dataset 861 (http://www.eia.gov/electricity/data/eia861/), provides average residential, commercial and industrial electricity rates with likely zip codes for both investor owned utilities (IOU) and non-investor owned utilities. Note: the files include average rates for each utility (not average rates per zip code), but not the detailed rate structure data found in the OpenEI U.S. Utility Rate Database (https://openei.org/apps/USURDB/).