Adult correctional services, custodial and community supervision, average counts of offenders in federal programs, Canada and regions, five years of data.

The Ministry of the Solicitor General annually releases data on the segregation, restrictive confinement, and deaths in custody of inmates in Ontario’s adult correctional system. Data Source: Offender Tracking Information System (OTIS) Segregation is defined in Ontario Regulation 778 as any type of custody where an inmate is in highly restricted conditions for 22 to 24 hours or does not receive a minimum of two hours of meaningful social interaction each day, excluding circumstances of an unscheduled lockdown. A record is created each time an inmate meets the conditions of segregation and closed when the inmate no longer meets those conditions. A break in a segregation placement is defined as occurring when an individual is out of segregation conditions for 24 or more continuous hours. The Ministry of the Solicitor General defines restrictive confinement as any type of confinement that is more restrictive than the general population but less restrictive than segregation. As a result, the ministry is reporting on any case within the fiscal year reporting period where an individual was held in a unit regularly scheduled to be locked down for 17 hours or more per day. This timeframe is considered more restrictive than that of the general population based on an assessment of provincewide lockdown times. Regularly scheduled lockdowns are daily routine times where movement out of a cell is restricted, such as during meal times and overnight. The Ministry of the Solicitor General is committed to providing greater transparency by releasing data on all custodial-related deaths that occurred within the calendar year reporting period. The datasets in this category include information on gender, race, age, religion or spiritual affiliation, and alerts for mental health concerns and suicide risk. To simplify the provision of data, several data tables include information on both individuals in segregation conditions and individuals in restrictive confinement. Due to the differences in the way that the data on segregation conditions and restrictive confinement have been collected, and the differences in the definitions of these concepts, these numbers should not be compared to each other. Some individuals may have both placements in restrictive confinement and segregation conditions, within the reporting period. Therefore, these numbers should not be added together when calculating proportions out of the total. Please refer to https://www.ontario.ca/page/jahn-settlement-data-inmates-ontario for additional information on the data release, including written overviews of the data and disclosure on data collection methods.

Adult correctional services, custodial and community supervision, average counts of adults in provincial and territorial programs, five years of data.

Get data about inmate segregation, restrictive confinement and deaths in correctional facilities.

Adult correctional services, operating expenditures for provincial, territorial and federal programs, provinces, territories and federal jurisdiction, five years of data.

This table represents admissions to adult correctional services by visible minority group and sex, with new data for the 2020/2021 fiscal year.

Average counts of young persons in provincial and territorial correctional services, five years of data.

Substance use during incarceration may present important health and safety concerns for offenders, such as the transmission of blood borne infections via injection drug use and needle sharing, the potential risk of overdose, and involvement in the drug subculture.

Canadians are generally supportive of community-based sentencing; many feel that these sentences could have a number of positive impacts from reducing crime and increasing safety to greater efficiency in the criminal justice system. What we also found: After reviewing statistics on incarceration rates and who is incarcerated in Canada, over half of Canadians (55%) agreed that too many people were incarcerated (17% disagreed and 18% neither agreed nor disagreed) Support for community-based sentences was much stronger for non-violent crimes.

Comparing the case characteristics of Black inmates in SIUs with others in SIUs as well as the mainstream Black inmate population may yield some important information especially with respect to providing targeted interventions to these individuals.

Adult correctional services, custodial and community admissions to provincial and territorial programs, five years of data.

This dataset provides the average daily count of male and female inmates being held in the Ottawa-Carleton Detention Centre covering fiscal years 2005-06 through to 2017-18.

Average daily counts are broken into six average counts:

• Federal sentence of two years or more/national parole violation
• Immigration hold
• Intermittent days stay (weekend days)
• Remand
• Provincial sentence of less than two years
• Other hold statuses than those listed

For more information, please see the Ottawa-Carleton Detention Centre "http://www.mcscs.jus.gov.on.ca/english/Corrections/OttawaCarletonDetentionCentreTaskForce/OCDCTaskForce%E2%80%93QuarterlyTrendsAnalysis.html">Quarterly Trends Analysis.

This dataset is related to the following:

• Ottawa-Carleton Detention Centre admissions alerts
• Ottawa-Carleton Detention Centre admissions to custody
• Ottawa-Carleton Detention Centre utilization rates
• Ottawa-Carleton Detention Centre specialized unit hold counts

Youth custody and community services, admissions and releases to correctional services, five years of data.

This data set shows the list of offenders convicted for offences under the Regulation Respecting Health, Maintenance and Security of Housing (RVM 03-096), following statements of violation issued by the Health Division of the Housing Department. Note that the convictions issued by the boroughs under the same by-law are not part of this set. The health inspections of the Housing Department are also available in open data. For any other details on housing health, please consult the [Housing Health, Maintenance and Security] page (https://montreal.ca/sujets/salubrite-entretien-et-securite-des-logements) on the City of Montreal's website.

The purpose of the study was to examine the processes of resistance in domestic violence offenders. Study One (Part 1, Study One Quantitative Data) was developed to refine and offer preliminary validation of the draft processes of resistance measure. In the summer of 2004, group facilitators collected data from 346 domestic violence offenders recruited from domestic violence agencies in Florida, California, Georgia, and Rhode Island. The 88 item draft processes of resistance measure was administered as part of a 280 item paper-and-pencil survey that took approximately 60 minutes to complete. Resistance items were placed in random order in the measure and in 50 percent of the surveys, resistance items were placed in reverse order within the measure. Study Two (Part 2, Study Two Quantitative Data), administered the processes of resistance measure to a separate sample of domestic violence offenders at batterer program intake and again two months later. Participants included 358 domestic violence offenders recruited from domestic violence agencies in Florida, Virginia, Rhode Island, Michigan, and Calgary, Canada, between January and December 2005. In Study Three (Part 3, Study Three Expert Interview Qualitative Data), 16 of the 18 domestic violence experts who were interviewed in Study One during the drafting of the resistance measure were invited by telephone or email to participate in a 1- hour interview on best practices for dealing with resistance. Thirteen experts who agreed to be interviewed were mailed a list of processes of resistance measure items and asked to give recommendations on how domestic violence counselors can respond to a client engaging in those behaviors in treatment. Interviews were conducted by telephone in November 2005, with an interviewer and note taker, and audiotaped. Part 1 (Study One Quantitative Data) and Part 2 (Study Two Quantitative Data) include demographic variables such as age, race, level of education, employment and income level, relationship to the domestic assault victim, months in batterer treatment, and criminal history. Both Parts also include variables to measure stage of change, decisional balance, processes of change, self-efficacy, physical and psychological aggression, social desirability, at risk drinking, and physical and mental health. Additionally, Part 2 includes variables on program attendance and completion. Part 3 (Study Three Expert Interviews Qualitative Data) includes domestic violence experts recommendations for managing eight types of resistance in batterer treatment including system blaming, problems with partner, problems with alliance, social justification, hopelessness, isolation, psychological reactance, and passive reactance.

Substance use during incarceration may present important health and safety concerns for offenders, such as the transmission of blood borne infections via injection drug use and needle sharing, the potential risk of overdose, and involvement in the drug subculture.

The Department of Justice Canada created the first performance monitoring framework (“the Framework”) for Canada’s criminal justice system in 2019. The Framework identified broad expected outcomes, measured by key indicators. The State of the Criminal Justice System Dashboard presents information from the Framework in one easily accessible location. The Dashboard shows information and data collected for over 40 performance indicators grouped by nine outcomes. This information is presented for the total population and by population-based theme. The population-based themes currently available are: Indigenous Peoples and Women. These themes present pre-filtered views of the data by sub-population, such as by Indigenous identity or sex/gender (where data are available). Under each theme, data users can also find contextual information on how different populations interact with the criminal justice system as victims, survivors, accused and offenders. The State of the Criminal Justice System Dashboard will be updated regularly as more data and information become available.

To facilitate initial security classification, Correctional Service of Canada (CSC) currently uses the Custody Rating Scale (CRS) which consists of two independently scored subscales; the Institutional Adjustment (IA) subscale that assesses risks associated with institutional misconducts, and the Security Risk (SR) subscale that measures the amount of danger the offender would pose to the public upon escape. Importantly, concerns have been raised that ‘gender-neutral’ assessment tools, such as the CRS may not consider all the relevant factors for women offenders and could result in over (or under) classification.

Community supervision profiles of Section 84 releases for Indigenous offenders released from men's institutions are unique compared to those of non-Section 84 participants. Involving Indigenous communities in the reintegration process of Indigenous offenders, specifically through the Section 84 release process, is fundamental to their success.The present research examines the prevalence of Section 84 releases among Indigenous offenders released from men's institutions, as well as the profiles of Indigenous offenders participating in Section 84 releases in comparison to those who did not.

Gender diverse offenders are a heterogeneous group with high static risk and dynamic need. In accordance with Bill C-16, on December 27, 2017, the Correctional Service of Canada (CSC) implemented its interim policy for gender diverse offenders to identify operational practices that may require accommodation for these offenders, particularly regarding the placement of offenders in a federal correctional institution of their gender preference.