The table District-Level Data is part of the dataset Electric School Bus (ESB) Adoption in the United States - May, 2022 ***, available at https://redivis.com/datasets/y29n-14cwxamcw. It contains 19554 rows across 85 variables.

This dataset tracks electric school bus (ESB) adoption across the United States. It tracks the number of “committed” ESBs at the school district level, as well as details about individual buses, including the bus manufacturer and funding source(s). It also tracks when each ESB passed through the phases of the adoption process and the current phase of each bus. The dataset contains school district socio-economic characteristics, like poverty rates, racial composition and air pollution to enable wider analysis including whether the transition to ESBs is happening equitably. This dataset was developed as part of WRI’s Electric School Bus Initiative. Findings from the dataset are summarized in our article on WRI Insights. The methods and sources for the dataset are described in the technical note. To be notified when the next update to this dataset is released, please sign up for updates from the Electric School Bus Initiative. We want to hear how you are using the data and how we can make it more useful in the future. Please submit feedback through this form.

For the 2020-2021 school year, only students who were enrolled in blended learning were assigned to bus routes. Therefore, students who are routed are assumed to be enrolled in blended learning. Students are reported as those who were planned and routed, but may or may not have used the service provided. Routes were determined by those routed with a vendor and student(s) assigned Vehicles are identified by school bus company reported data. This data is subject to data entry error and is dependent on the school bus companies to maintain. All transportation sites were included, and reported by type. A transportation site was defined by a unique location identified by a street address. Please note: multiple students or schools can be located in the same address and would therefore represent a stop for multiple students at the same site. MetroCard passes are assigned at the school. For public and charter schools, OPT reports students assigned to MetroCard, which includes those assigned a MetroCard by serial number or "T'd" for MetroCard, meaning the school indicated the student as eligible for a MetroCard but did not yet assign a serial number. For Non-Public schools, OPT reports on students who are eligible for MetoCards if they are not assigned to yellow bus service Some special education schools do not classify students by grade level. Students attending such schools are identified as “NG.” Service type is representative only of the type of busing a student is assigned to and is not reflective of the educational classification of a student. Students who are classified as special education but do not have an IEP mandate for specific transportation accommodations may be assigned to general education busing. General education students under certain circumstances including, but not limited to temporary housing status, orders of protection and medical conditions may be assigned to special education busing. OPT assigns students to busing but cannot confirm student ridership. This reporting would have to be captured at the school level. Students in temporary housing (STH) situations other than those reported to be living in a DHS shelter were excluded from the report due to data quality issues. While the DOE student data system (ATS) has a housing indicator flag, it is often inaccurate and unreliable. Therefore, OPT cannot reliably report on the temporary housing status of students other than those residing in DHS shelters, where a daily report indicating shelter status is provided. Transportation data for students in Foster Care is also provided. Please see section 21-993 B7 for reporting. Stop to school bus service is typically not provided to students after the 6th grade. Those assigned to this service are students who are granted individual or school-wide exceptions. In addition to students who applied for transportation because of foster care placement, also reported were students known to be in foster care who received busing or A MetroCard to provide a more complete report of students in foster care who received service. Students in foster care were identified by a monthly data feed from ACS to OPT via DIIT. Source is subject to error due to data matching to identify OSIS based on name and data of birth.

The table Glossary is part of the dataset Electric School Bus (ESB) Adoption in the United States - May, 2022 ***, available at https://redivis.com/datasets/y29n-14cwxamcw. It contains 4 rows across 3 variables.

The table State School Bus Fleets is part of the dataset Electric School Bus (ESB) Adoption in the United States - May, 2022 ***, available at https://redivis.com/datasets/y29n-14cwxamcw. It contains 52 rows across 5 variables.

OPT provides transportation service to many different kinds of locations. Many of these locations are schools but they also include offices or other sites that may be part of certain students’ educational plans. The schools may be public, private or religious. OPT provides busing to some Pre-K sites for students who have an IEP for curb-to-curb busing because of medical condition. Transportation service is not limited to school bus service; it includes distribution of MetroCards and approved reimbursement services. Bus service can be conducted on a yellow school bus, an ambulance, or even a coach bus. Yellow school buses are available in a number of sizes and seating configurations. This dataset includes schools, offices or Pre-K/EI sites that currently receive any transportation services from OPT. These sites may be within the New York City limits or up to fifty miles from the city limits in the states of New York, New Jersey or Connecticut. This dataset does not include field trip destinations.

The adoption of electric school buses in the United States has been steadily increasing over the years. From 2017 to 2022, there has been a clear upward trend in the number of committed electric school buses. The most recent data from 2023 shows stagnating numbers of newly committed school buses. In 2022 and 2023, just over ***** electric school buses were committed annually.

Students are reported as those who were planned and routed, but may or may not have used the service provided. Student stop assignment is done at the school, OPT creates the routes. Routes were determined by those routed with students assigned Vehicles are identified by school bus company reported data. This data is subject to data entry error and is dependent on the school bus companies to maintain. All transportation sites were included, and reported by type. A transportation site was defined by a unique location identified by a street address. Please note multiple students or schools can be located in the same address and would there for represent multiple stops at the same site.

These data are part of NACJD's Fast Track Release and are distributed as they were received from the data depositor. The files have been zipped by NACJD for release, but not checked or processed except for the removal of direct identifiers. Users should refer to the accompanying readme files for a brief dscription of the files available with this collection and consult the investigator(s) if further information is needed. The qualitative data are not available as part of the data collection at this time. Numerous high-profile events involving student victimization on school buses have raised critical questions regarding the safety of school-based transportation for children, the efforts taken by school districts to protect students on buses, and the most effective transportation-based behavioral management strategies for reducing misconduct. To address these questions, a national web-based survey was administered to public school district-level transportation officials throughout the United States to assess the prevalence of misconduct on buses, identify strategies to address misconduct, and describe effective ways to reduce student misbehavior on buses. Telephone interviews were also conducted with a small group of transportation officials to understand the challenges of transportation-based behavioral management, to determine successful strategies to create safe and positive school bus environments, and to identify data-driven approaches for tracking and assessing disciplinary referrals. The collection includes 10 Stata data files: BVSBS_analysis file.dta (n=2,595; 1058 variables) Title Crosswalk File.dta (n=2,594; 3 variables) Lessons Learned and Open Dummies.dta (n=1,543; 200 variables) CCD dataset.dta (n=12,494; 89 variables) BVSB_REGION.dta (n=4; 3 variables) BVSB_SCHOOLS.dta (n=3; 3 variables) BVSB_STUDENTS.dta (n=3; 3 variables) BVSB_URBAN.dta (n=8; 3 variables) BVSB_WHITE.dta (n=3; 3 variables) FINALRAKER.dta (n=2,595; 2 variables)

Student ride times were reported as defined by the time difference between the scheduled stop time and the school session time. This was reported at the student level as this is a more useful metric for judging service provided. A full route, including all pick ups and drop offs would not be reflective of the time any individual student spent on the bus. Current curb-to-school routing systems do not capture scheduled pick up times, therefore this metric could not be calculated. Pick up times are estimated by school bus companies and communicated to parents directly. For stop-to-school routes the average scheduled student ride time was provided. As stated above, this could not be calculated for curb-to-school service as our current data structure does not support this Students with blank to school Monday session time were excluded. Dry run reporting was submitted with the April 2021 report

Comprehensive dataset of 3,395 School bus services in United States as of July, 2025. Includes verified contact information (email, phone), geocoded addresses, customer ratings, reviews, business categories, and operational details. Perfect for market research, lead generation, competitive analysis, and business intelligence. Download a complimentary sample to evaluate data quality and completeness.

Comprehensive dataset containing 10 verified School bus service businesses in Montana, United States with complete contact information, ratings, reviews, and location data.

In the April 2022 budget passed by the New York State Legislature and signed by Governor Hochul, the State established a deadline for the transition to zero-emission buses. Specifically, all school buses in the State must be zero-emission buses by 2035. In 2022, voters across NYS overwhelming voted for the Clean Air, Clean Water and Green Jobs Environmental Bond Act (Bond Act) which includes $500M to support the transition to zero-emission school buses. NYSERDA has established the NY School Bus Incentive Program (NYSBIP) to achieve these State public purposes and assist school districts in meeting the zero-emission bus timelines. NYSBIP is a voucher incentive program which will accelerate the deployment of zero-emission school buses and charging infrastructures throughout New York State. Zero-emission school buses include both electric school buses and hydrogen fuel cell school buses (collectively referred to as ESBs). This dataset focuses on the school bus-side of the program. The dataset is compiled from the information collected throughout the project application process. The New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA) offers objective information and analysis, innovative programs, technical expertise, and support to help New Yorkers increase energy efficiency, save money, use renewable energy, and reduce reliance on fossil fuels. To learn more about NYSERDA’s programs, visit nyserda.ny.gov or follow us on X, Facebook, YouTube, or Instagram.

Graph and download economic data for Total Revenue for School and Employee Bus Transportation, All Establishments, Employer Firms (REVEF4854ALLEST) from 2009 to 2022 about schools, buses, passenger, employer firms, accounting, revenue, establishments, services, employment, and USA.

The table Counties is part of the dataset Electric School Bus (ESB) Adoption in the United States - May, 2022 ***, available at https://redivis.com/datasets/y29n-14cwxamcw. It contains 25410 rows across 6 variables.

One of OPT’s main functions is to plan efficient and fiscally responsible school bus routes. OPT staff use a variety of systems to generate and share bus route information with bus vendors and the public. Specific bus route paths cannot be publicly disclosed because they could reveal personally identifiable information about individual students. In this dataset, OPT has provided all the route information that does not risk disclosing personally identifiable information. School-age service for students in grades K through 12 are contracted with bus vendors on a per route basis. OPT also manages bus service for Pre-K students who require curb-to-curb service as per a student’s Individualized Education Plan (IEP). This Pre-K bus service is contracted on a per student basis, instead of per route. As a consequence of this difference, OPT does not design bus routes for Pre-K service, so those routes are not included in this dataset. There are a variety of different vehicles used on routes that serve students requiring curb-to-curb service because an Individualized Education Plan (IEP) indicates specific transportation needs. The standard bus is the only vehicle used for general education routes with students eligible for bus service but who do not have an IEP. Users may occasionally see a route without a garage assignment. Because this dataset is derived from a snapshot of a transactional system, there may be routes that are in the process of being assigned to a garage. In those cases, the garage information will appear as NULL until the assignment is complete.

Pupil Transportation Pre-school and school-age general & special Education Student Bussing by Vendors & Routes updated 21-993. Contains total count of students assigned Stop to School Routes by Vendor and service type, school bus company.

Snapshot img

School Bus Market Size 2025-2029

The school bus market size is forecast to increase by USD 1.35 billion at a CAGR of 4% between 2024 and 2029.

The market is experiencing significant growth, driven primarily by the increasing number of school enrollments worldwide. This trend is particularly noticeable in developing countries, where expanding access to education is a priority. Another key factor fueling market expansion is the adoption of technological innovations, such as GPS tracking systems, electronic fare collection, and real-time student information systems. These advancements not only enhance safety and efficiency but also provide valuable data for school administrators and parents. However, the market is not without challenges. Stringent emission and fuel economy standards are becoming increasingly important, necessitating the use of alternative fuels and more efficient bus designs. Meeting these regulations while maintaining affordability is a significant challenge for market participants. Additionally, the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted traditional school bus operations, leading to the need for flexible and adaptable solutions. Companies seeking to capitalize on market opportunities and navigate these challenges effectively must stay informed about the latest regulatory requirements and technological advancements, and be prepared to pivot their strategies as needed.

What will be the Size of the School Bus Market during the forecast period?

Request Free SampleThe market in the US is experiencing significant growth, driven by the increasing adoption of electric buses to mitigate harmful emissions and address student health concerns, such as allergies and asthma. This shift towards electromobility is also influenced by the integration of advanced technologies, including GPS tracking, enhanced braking systems, and IoT-enabled fleet management solutions. The market's evolution is further fueled by the rising student enrollment in educational institutions, which necessitates the expansion of transportation capacities. Parents' growing emphasis on student safety, mental and physical well-being, and reaction time improvements are also critical factors. The integration of artificial intelligence and seat belts enhances safety features, while improved driver visibility and fuel efficiency contribute to the market's expansion. Air pollution concerns and the need for greenhouse gas emissions reduction further bolster the market's momentum. Byd, among other players, is making strides in this sector by offering efficient and eco-friendly electric buses.

How is this School Bus Industry segmented?

The school bus industry research report provides comprehensive data (region-wise segment analysis), with forecasts and estimates in 'USD million' for the period 2025-2029, as well as historical data from 2019-2023 for the following segments. Powertrain TypeICE-poweredElectricTypeType CType BType AType DGeographyNorth AmericaUSCanadaAPACChinaIndiaJapanSouth KoreaEuropeFranceGermanyItalyUKMiddle East and AfricaSouth America

By Powertrain Type Insights

The ice-powered segment is estimated to witness significant growth during the forecast period.School buses, a vital component of the transport sector, are transitioning towards cleaner and more efficient alternatives to address the air pollution issue. ICE vehicles, including diesel buses, continue to dominate the market but face challenges due to their harmful emissions. Particulate matter and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are major pollutants emitted by ICE-powered school buses, which can penetrate deep into the lungs and cause severe health issues such as asthma, allergies, and respiratory health concerns. To mitigate these challenges, alternative fuel options like compressed natural gas (CNG) and propane have gained traction. These fuels use the same powertrain as ICE vehicles but offer reduced emissions. Additionally, electric buses are gaining popularity due to their zero-emission capabilities. Manufacturers like Thomas Built Buses and BYD are introducing electric school buses with advanced features such as thermal management systems, Artificial Intelligence, and Fleet Management Solutions to enhance student safety, cognitive development, and driver visibility. These buses also offer longer life, better fuel efficiency, and lower maintenance costs. Electromobility and clean mobility initiatives are driving the market, with incentives and incentives for zero-emission models. The integration of IoT, GPS tracking, and mobile power units further enhances the student experience, providing a peaceful ride and addressing mental well-being concerns. Despite these advancements, challenges remain, such as battery weight, charging infrastructure, and grid failures. However, economies of scale and continuous technological advancements are expected to overcome these hurdles. Rising student en

In this study, we took advantage of the randomized allocation of the US EPA's funding for school bus replacements and retrofits to causally assess the impacts of upgrading buses on students' educational performance through the EPA’s national School Bus Rebate Program. Specifically, we used classical intent-to-treat analyses for randomized controlled trials to compare the change in school district level reading and language arts and math standardized test scores after vs before the 2012 through 2016 lotteries by funding selection status . We used overall district average standardized test scores since rates were not available for only school-bus riders.

In this study, we took advantage of the randomized allocation of the US EPA's funding for school bus replacements and retrofits to causally assess the impacts of upgrading buses on student attendance through the EPA’s national School Bus Rebate Program. Specifically, we used classical intent-to-treat analyses for randomized controlled trials to compare the change in school district level attendance rates after vs before the 2012 through 2017 lotteries by funding selection status . We used overall district attendance rates since rates were not available for only school-bus riders.