We'll extract any data from any website on the Internet. You don't have to worry about buying and maintaining complex and expensive software, or hiring developers.

Some common use cases our customers use the data for: • Data Analysis • Market Research • Price Monitoring • Sales Leads • Competitor Analysis • Recruitment

We can get data from websites with pagination or scroll, with captchas, and even from behind logins. Text, images, videos, documents.

Receive data in any format you need: Excel, CSV, JSON, or any other.

UPS Facilities Locations Dataset

Locations and Details of UPS Facilities across the United States

By Homeland Infrastructure Foundation [source]

About this dataset

The UPS Facilities dataset is a comprehensive collection of information about UPS (United Parcel Service) facilities located across the United States. This dataset provides details on the location, placement, and contact information of each facility.

The dataset includes various columns such as X and Y coordinates, which indicate the longitude and latitude coordinates respectively. These coordinates pinpoint the exact geographic location of each UPS facility. Additionally, there are columns for the name of each facility, address including street address and additional information (ADDRESS2 and ADDRESS3), city, state, ZIP code, phone number for contact purposes.

Furthermore, this dataset provides insightful information about each facility's match status in terms of its address accuracy or completeness. It also includes details about the specific business associated with each UPS facility.

In addition to these data points, there are columns that provide census codes for each facility location. These codes offer additional contextual information related to demographic and socio-economic characteristics associated with each area where a UPS facility is situated.

Overall, this extensive dataset serves as a comprehensive resource for researchers or businesses looking to analyze or utilize information regarding UPS facilities across different states in the United States

How to use the dataset

Introduction:

• Understanding the Dataset Structure: The dataset consists of several columns that provide relevant information about each UPS facility location. Here is a brief overview of the key columns:

• NAME: The name of the UPS facility.

• ADDRESS: The street address of the UPS facility.

• ADDRESS2/ADDRESS3: Additional address information for the facility.

• CITY/STATE/ZIP: The city, state, and ZIP code where the facility is located.

• PHONE: The contact phone number for the facility.

Additionally, there are geographic coordinates (LATITUDE and LONGITUDE) representing each facility's precise location on a map. Other columns such as PLACEMENT, MATCHSTATU, CENSUSCODE, and BUSINESSNA provide further context regarding placement status, address matching status, census codes for locations, and associated business names.

• Potential Use Cases:

a) Visualizing Facility Distribution: Using latitude and longitude coordinates from this dataset with mapping tools like Python's Folium or Tableau can help create interactive maps that showcase spatial distributions across different regions.

b) Analyzing Facility Density: By aggregating data at regional levels (e.g., state-wise), you can analyze which areas have higher concentrations of UPS facilities compared to others. This analysis may offer insights into patterns related to population density or commercial activity.

c) Optimizing Transportation Routes: Understanding where these facilities are located can be beneficial for route optimization. By analyzing facility placements and their proximity to transportation networks, you can identify potential areas for streamlining logistics operations.

d) Market Research: The dataset's additional columns (such as BUSINESSNA) allow researchers to analyze UPS facilities within the context of associated businesses. This information can be useful for market research, identifying industry clusters, or studying supply chain dynamics.

• Data Cleaning and Preprocessing: Before utilizing this dataset, it is recommended to perform standard data cleaning procedures, such as handling missing or incorrect values. Pay attention to any inconsistencies in column names or encoding formats that may require normalization.

• Combining with Other Datasets: To

Research Ideas

• Geospatial analysis: This dataset can be used for geospatial analysis to analyze the distribution and concentration of UPS facilities across different states or cities. It can help identify areas with high or low availability of UPS services and assist logistics planning and decision making.
• Customer segmentation: By combining this dataset with customer data, businesses can segment their customers based on proximity to UPS facilities. This can help companies optimize their delivery routes, improve customer service, and target marketing efforts more effectively.
• Benchmarking and competition analysis: The dataset can also be used for benchmarking purposes by comparing the number of UPS facilities in different regions or against competito...

This dataset contains a listing of incorporated places (cities and towns) and counties within the United States including the GNIS code, FIPS code, name, entity type and primary point (location) for the entity. The types of entities listed in this dataset are based on codes provided by the U.S. Census Bureau, and include the following: C1 - An active incorporated place that does not serve as a county subdivision equivalent; C2 - An active incorporated place legally coextensive with a county subdivision but treated as independent of any county subdivision; C3 - A consolidated city; C4 - An active incorporated place with an alternate official common name; C5 - An active incorporated place that is independent of any county subdivision and serves as a county subdivision equivalent; C6 - An active incorporated place that partially is independent of any county subdivision and serves as a county subdivision equivalent or partially coextensive with a county subdivision but treated as independent of any county subdivision; C7 - An incorporated place that is independent of any county; C8 - The balance of a consolidated city excluding the separately incorporated place(s) within that consolidated government; C9 - An inactive or nonfunctioning incorporated place; H1 - An active county or statistically equivalent entity; H4 - A legally defined inactive or nonfunctioning county or statistically equivalent entity; H5 - A census areas in Alaska, a statistical county equivalent entity; and H6 - A county or statistically equivalent entity that is areally coextensive or governmentally consolidated with an incorporated place, part of an incorporated place, or a consolidated city.

Point of Interest (POI) is defined as an entity (such as a business) at a ground location (point) which may be (of interest). We provide high-quality POI data that is fresh, consistent, customizable, easy to use and with high-density coverage for all countries of the world.

This is our process flow:

Our machine learning systems continuously crawl for new POI data
Our geoparsing and geocoding calculates their geo locations
Our categorization systems cleanup and standardize the datasets
Our data pipeline API publishes the datasets on our data store

A new POI comes into existence. It could be a bar, a stadium, a museum, a restaurant, a cinema, or store, etc.. In today's interconnected world its information will appear very quickly in social media, pictures, websites, press releases. Soon after that, our systems will pick it up.

POI Data is in constant flux. Every minute worldwide over 200 businesses will move, over 600 new businesses will open their doors and over 400 businesses will cease to exist. And over 94% of all businesses have a public online presence of some kind tracking such changes. When a business changes, their website and social media presence will change too. We'll then extract and merge the new information, thus creating the most accurate and up-to-date business information dataset across the globe.

We offer our customers perpetual data licenses for any dataset representing this ever changing information, downloaded at any given point in time. This makes our company's licensing model unique in the current Data as a Service - DaaS Industry. Our customers don't have to delete our data after the expiration of a certain "Term", regardless of whether the data was purchased as a one time snapshot, or via our data update pipeline.

Customers requiring regularly updated datasets may subscribe to our Annual subscription plans. Our data is continuously being refreshed, therefore subscription plans are recommended for those who need the most up to date data. The main differentiators between us vs the competition are our flexible licensing terms and our data freshness.

Data samples may be downloaded at https://store.poidata.xyz/us

Analysis of ‘Popular Website Traffic Over Time ’ provided by Analyst-2 (analyst-2.ai), based on source dataset retrieved from https://www.kaggle.com/yamqwe/popular-website-traffice on 13 February 2022.

--- Dataset description provided by original source is as follows ---

About this dataset

Background

Have you every been in a conversation and the question comes up, who uses Bing? This question comes up occasionally because people wonder if these sites have any views. For this research study, we are going to be exploring popular website traffic for many popular websites.

Methodology

The data collected originates from SimilarWeb.com.

Source

For the analysis and study, go to The Concept Center

This dataset was created by Chase Willden and contains around 0 samples along with 1/1/2017, Social Media, technical information and other features such as: - 12/1/2016 - 3/1/2017 - and more.

How to use this dataset

• Analyze 11/1/2016 in relation to 2/1/2017
• Study the influence of 4/1/2017 on 1/1/2017
• More datasets

Acknowledgements

If you use this dataset in your research, please credit Chase Willden

Start A New Notebook!

--- Original source retains full ownership of the source dataset ---

SafeGraph Places provides baseline location information and addresses for every record in the SafeGraph product suite via the Places schema and polygon information when applicable via the Geometry schema. The current scope of a place is defined as any location humans can visit with the exception of single-family homes. This definition encompasses a diverse set of places ranging from restaurants, grocery stores, and malls; to parks, hospitals, museums, offices, and industrial parks. Premium sets of Places include apartment buildings, Parking Lots, and Point POIs (such as ATMs or transit stations).

SafeGraph Places is a point of interest (POI) data offering with varying coverage depending on the country. Note that address conventions and formatting vary across countries. SafeGraph has coalesced these fields into the Places schema.

SafeGraph provides clean and accurate geospatial datasets on 51M+ physical places/points of interest (POI) globally. Hundreds of industry leaders like Mapbox, Verizon, Clear Channel, and Esri already rely on SafeGraph POI data to unlock business insights and drive innovation.

OPT provides transportation service to many different kinds of locations. Many of these locations are schools but they also include offices or other sites that may be part of certain students’ educational plans. The schools may be public, private or religious. OPT provides busing to some Pre-K sites for students who have an IEP for curb-to-curb busing because of medical condition. Transportation service is not limited to school bus service; it includes distribution of MetroCards and approved reimbursement services. Bus service can be conducted on a yellow school bus, an ambulance, or even a coach bus. Yellow school buses are available in a number of sizes and seating configurations. This dataset includes schools, offices or Pre-K/EI sites that currently receive any transportation services from OPT. These sites may be within the New York City limits or up to fifty miles from the city limits in the states of New York, New Jersey or Connecticut. This dataset does not include field trip destinations.

The Residential School Locations Dataset [IRS_Locations.csv] contains the locations (latitude and longitude) of Residential Schools and student hostels operated by the federal government in Canada. All the residential schools and hostels that are listed in the Indian Residential School Settlement Agreement are included in this dataset, as well as several Industrial schools and residential schools that were not part of the IRRSA. This version of the dataset doesn’t include the five schools under the Newfoundland and Labrador Residential Schools Settlement Agreement. The original school location data was created by the Truth and Reconciliation Commission, and was provided to the researcher (Rosa Orlandini) by the National Centre for Truth and Reconciliation in April 2017. The dataset was created by Rosa Orlandini, and builds upon and enhances the previous work of the Truth and Reconcilation Commission, Morgan Hite (creator of the Atlas of Indian Residential Schools in Canada that was produced for the Tk'emlups First Nation and Justice for Day Scholar's Initiative, and Stephanie Pyne (project lead for the Residential Schools Interactive Map). Each individual school location in this dataset is attributed either to RSIM, Morgan Hite, NCTR or Rosa Orlandini. Many schools/hostels had several locations throughout the history of the institution. If the school/hostel moved from its’ original location to another property, then the school is considered to have two unique locations in this dataset,the original location and the new location. For example, Lejac Indian Residential School had two locations while it was operating, Stuart Lake and Fraser Lake. If a new school building was constructed on the same property as the original school building, it isn't considered to be a new location, as is the case of Girouard Indian Residential School.When the precise location is known, the coordinates of the main building are provided, and when the precise location of the building isn’t known, an approximate location is provided. For each residential school institution location, the following information is provided: official names, alternative name, dates of operation, religious affiliation, latitude and longitude coordinates, community location, Indigenous community name, contributor (of the location coordinates), school/institution photo (when available), location point precision, type of school (hostel or residential school) and list of references used to determine the location of the main buildings or sites.

MCGD_Data_V2.2 contains all the data that we have collected on locations in modern China, plus a number of locations outside of China that we encounter frequently in historical sources on China. All further updates will appear under the name "MCGD_Data" with a time stamp (e.g., MCGD_Data2023-06-21)

You can also have access to this dataset and all the datasets that the ENP-China makes available on GitLab: https://gitlab.com/enpchina/IndexesEnp

Altogether there are 464,970 entries. The data include the name of locations and their variants in Chinese, pinyin, and any recorded transliteration; the name of the province in Chinese and in pinyin; Province ID; the latitude and longitude; the Name ID and Location ID, and NameID_Legacy. The Name IDs all start with H followed by seven digits. This is the internal ID system of MCGD (the NameID_Legacy column records the Name IDs in their original format depending on the source). Locations IDs that start with "DH" are data points extracted from China Historical GIS (Harvard University); those that start with "D" are locations extracted from the data points in Geonames; those that have only digits (8 digits) are data points we have added from various map sources.

One of the main features of the MCGD Main Dataset is the systematic collection and compilation of place names from non-Chinese language historical sources. Locations were designated in transliteration systems that are hardly comprehensible today, which makes it very difficult to find the actual locations they correspond to. This dataset allows for the conversion from these obsolete transliterations to the current names and geocoordinates.

From June 2021 onward, we have adopted a different file naming system to keep track of versions. From MCGD_Data_V1 we have moved to MCGD_Data_V2. In June 2022, we introduced time stamps, which result in the following naming convention: MCGD_Data_YYYY.MM.DD.

UPDATES

MCGD_Data2025_02_28 includes a major change with the duplication of all the locations listed under Beijing, Shanghai, Tianjin, and Chongqing (北京, 上海, 天津, 重慶) and their listing under the name of the provinces to which they belonge origially before the creation of the four special municipalities after 1949. This is meant to facilitate the matching of data from historical sources. Each location has a unique NameID. Altogether there are 472,818 entries

MCGD_Data2025_02_27 inclues an update on locations extracted from Minguo zhengfu ge yuanhui keyuan yishang zhiyuanlu 國民政府各院部會科員以上職員錄 (Directory of staff members and above in the ministries and committees of the National Government). Nanjing: Guomin zhengfu wenguanchu yinzhuju 國民政府文官處印鑄局國民政府文官處印鑄局, 1944). We also made corrections in the Prov_Py and Prov_Zh columns as there were some misalignments between the pinyin name and the name in Chines characters. The file now includes 465,128 entries.

MCGD_Data2024_03_23 includes an update on locations in Taiwan from the Asia Directories. Altogether there are 465,603 entries (of which 187 place names without geocoordinates, labelled in the Lat Long columns as "Unknown").

MCGD_Data2023.12.22 contains all the data that we have collected on locations in China, whatever the period. Altogether there are 465,603 entries (of which 187 place names without geocoordinates, labelled in the Lat Long columns as "Unknown"). The dataset also includes locations outside of China for the purpose of matching such locations to the place names extracted from historical sources. For example, one may need to locate individuals born outside of China. Rather than maintaining two separate files, we made the decision to incorporate all the place names found in historical sources in the gazetteer. Such place names can easily be removed by selecting all the entries where the 'Province' data is missing.

The Residential Schools Locations Dataset in Geodatabase format (IRS_Locations.gbd) contains a feature layer "IRS_Locations" that contains the locations (latitude and longitude) of Residential Schools and student hostels operated by the federal government in Canada. All the residential schools and hostels that are listed in the Residential Schools Settlement Agreement are included in this dataset, as well as several Industrial schools and residential schools that were not part of the IRRSA. This version of the dataset doesn’t include the five schools under the Newfoundland and Labrador Residential Schools Settlement Agreement. The original school location data was created by the Truth and Reconciliation Commission, and was provided to the researcher (Rosa Orlandini) by the National Centre for Truth and Reconciliation in April 2017. The dataset was created by Rosa Orlandini, and builds upon and enhances the previous work of the Truth and Reconcilation Commission, Morgan Hite (creator of the Atlas of Indian Residential Schools in Canada that was produced for the Tk'emlups First Nation and Justice for Day Scholar's Initiative, and Stephanie Pyne (project lead for the Residential Schools Interactive Map). Each individual school location in this dataset is attributed either to RSIM, Morgan Hite, NCTR or Rosa Orlandini. Many schools/hostels had several locations throughout the history of the institution. If the school/hostel moved from its’ original location to another property, then the school is considered to have two unique locations in this dataset,the original location and the new location. For example, Lejac Indian Residential School had two locations while it was operating, Stuart Lake and Fraser Lake. If a new school building was constructed on the same property as the original school building, it isn't considered to be a new location, as is the case of Girouard Indian Residential School.When the precise location is known, the coordinates of the main building are provided, and when the precise location of the building isn’t known, an approximate location is provided. For each residential school institution location, the following information is provided: official names, alternative name, dates of operation, religious affiliation, latitude and longitude coordinates, community location, Indigenous community name, contributor (of the location coordinates), school/institution photo (when available), location point precision, type of school (hostel or residential school) and list of references used to determine the location of the main buildings or sites. Access Instructions: there are 47 files in this data package. Please download the entire data package by selecting all the 47 files and click on download. Two files will be downloaded, IRS_Locations.gbd.zip and IRS_LocFields.csv. Uncompress the IRS_Locations.gbd.zip. Use QGIS, ArcGIS Pro, and ArcMap to open the feature layer IRS_Locations that is contained within the IRS_Locations.gbd data package. The feature layer is in WGS 1984 coordinate system. There is also detailed file level metadata included in this feature layer file. The IRS_locations.csv provides the full description of the fields and codes used in this dataset.

The Mammography Facility Database is updated periodically based on information received from the four FDA-approved accreditation bodies: the American College of Radiology (ACR), and the States of Arkansas, Iowa, and Texas. Information received by FDA or Certifying State from accreditation bodies does not specify if the facility is mobile or stationary. In many instances, but not all, the accreditation body notes Mobile following the name of the facility. The certification status of facilities may change, so FDA suggests that you check the facility's current status and look for the MQSA certificate.

Special Areas of Conservation (SACs) are strictly protected sites designated under the EC Habitats Directive. This dataset is derived from the UK wide data submitted to the EU Commmission in cumulative batches known as Tranches. A substantial update to these data was done as part of the Standard Data Form updating exercise on 22 December 2015 (Tranche 50) . It contains basic site details for each and every SAC - there is one row in the dataset for each individual site. The data here are for the following sections of the standard data form. Sections 1, 2 (except 2.5) + sections 4.2 (quality and importance) and 4.1 - site characteristics. Notes on specific columns: IS_MARINE This indicates that the site contains marine habitat (below high water) AND supports one or more qualifying marine species. The definitions of marine components are shown on the JNCC website. 0 = Not considered to be a Marine Protected Area 1= Marine Protected Area. DESIGNATION_STATUS_CODE cSAC = submitted to the EU as a candidate site but not yet adopted by the EU as an SCI SCI= Site of Community Importance - a status conferred by the EU Commission. SAC = Designated SAC. The final stage in the process SITE_COMP_DATE compilation data of original Standard Data Form SITE_SCI_PROP_DATE Date submitted to the EU as a candidate SAC. SITE_QUALITY this is extracted from Section 4.2 of the Standard Data Form. It is a statement of the qualify and importance of the site. All qualifying interest features are listed, with a qualifying phrase to justify the inclusion of each feature.

Archived versions of this dataset are also available as part of a time series. These may be useful in determining how many sites there were at a given point of time, and also how some of the detailed information might have changed over time. Note that the data columns in this series of datasets were revised slightly in December 2015. Each archived version corresponds to a European submission. A record of the changes made at each submisison is shown here. http://jncc.defra.gov.uk/page-1488

The USGS National Hydrography Dataset (NHD) downloadable data collection from The National Map (TNM) is a comprehensive set of digital spatial data that encodes information about naturally occurring and constructed bodies of surface water (lakes, ponds, and reservoirs), paths through which water flows (canals, ditches, streams, and rivers), and related entities such as point features (springs, wells, stream gages, and dams). The information encoded about these features includes classification and other characteristics, delineation, geographic name, position and related measures, a "reach code" through which other information can be related to the NHD, and the direction of water flow. The network of reach codes delineating water and transported material flow allows users to trace movement in upstream and downstream directions. In addition to this geographic information, the dataset contains metadata that supports the exchange of future updates and improvements to the data. The NHD supports many applications, such as making maps, geocoding observations, flow modeling, data maintenance, and stewardship. For additional information on NHD, go to https://www.usgs.gov/core-science-systems/ngp/national-hydrography.

DWR was the steward for NHD and Watershed Boundary Dataset (WBD) in California. We worked with other organizations to edit and improve NHD and WBD, using the business rules for California. California's NHD improvements were sent to USGS for incorporation into the national database. The most up-to-date products are accessible from the USGS website. Please note that the California portion of the National Hydrography Dataset is appropriate for use at the 1:24,000 scale.

For additional derivative products and resources, including the major features in geopackage format, please go to this page: https://data.cnra.ca.gov/dataset/nhd-major-features Archives of previous statewide extracts of the NHD going back to 2018 may be found at https://data.cnra.ca.gov/dataset/nhd-archive.

In September 2022, USGS officially notified DWR that the NHD would become static as USGS resources will be devoted to the transition to the new 3D Hydrography Program (3DHP). 3DHP will consist of LiDAR-derived hydrography at a higher resolution than NHD. Upon completion, 3DHP data will be easier to maintain, based on a modern data model and architecture, and better meet the requirements of users that were documented in the Hydrography Requirements and Benefits Study (2016). The initial releases of 3DHP include NHD data cross-walked into the 3DHP data model. It will take several years for the 3DHP to be built out for California. Please refer to the resources on this page for more information.

The FINAL,STATIC version of the National Hydrography Dataset for California was published for download by USGS on December 27, 2023. This dataset can no longer be edited by the state stewards. The next generation of national hydrography data is the USGS 3D Hydrography Program (3DHP).

Questions about the California stewardship of these datasets may be directed to nhd_stewardship@water.ca.gov.

The Military Bases dataset was last updated on October 23, 2024 and are defined by Fiscal Year 2023 data, from the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Energy, Installations, and Environment and is part of the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT)/Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS) National Transportation Atlas Database (NTAD). The dataset depicts the authoritative locations of the most commonly known Department of Defense (DoD) sites, installations, ranges, and training areas world-wide. These sites encompass land which is federally owned or otherwise managed. This dataset was created from source data provided by the four Military Service Component headquarters and was compiled by the Defense Installation Spatial Data Infrastructure (DISDI) Program within the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Energy, Installations, and Environment. Only sites reported in the BSR or released in a map supplementing the Foreign Investment Risk Review Modernization Act of 2018 (FIRRMA) Real Estate Regulation (31 CFR Part 802) were considered for inclusion. This list does not necessarily represent a comprehensive collection of all Department of Defense facilities. For inventory purposes, installations are comprised of sites, where a site is defined as a specific geographic location of federally owned or managed land and is assigned to military installation. DoD installations are commonly referred to as a base, camp, post, station, yard, center, homeport facility for any ship, or other activity under the jurisdiction, custody, control of the DoD. While every attempt has been made to provide the best available data quality, this data set is intended for use at mapping scales between 1:50,000 and 1:3,000,000. For this reason, boundaries in this data set may not perfectly align with DoD site boundaries depicted in other federal data sources. Maps produced at a scale of 1:50,000 or smaller which otherwise comply with National Map Accuracy Standards, will remain compliant when this data is incorporated. Boundary data is most suitable for larger scale maps; point locations are better suited for mapping scales between 1:250,000 and 1:3,000,000. If a site is part of a Joint Base (effective/designated on 1 October, 2010) as established under the 2005 Base Realignment and Closure process, it is attributed with the name of the Joint Base. All sites comprising a Joint Base are also attributed to the responsible DoD Component, which is not necessarily the pre-2005 Component responsible for the site.

Natural monuments and sites whose conservation or preservation presents, from an artistic, historical, scientific, legendary or picturesque point of view, a general interest. Sites can be registered or classified. The classification offers strong protection by prohibiting, unless special authorisation is granted according to the importance of the work by the Minister responsible for the sites or the prefect of department, the carrying out of any work aimed at modifying or destroying the appearance of the site.

The RECSITES data layer contains a wide range of recreational sites in Vermont. This point data layer includes parks, ski areas, boat access points, and many other recreational features.

This dataset package is focused on U.S construction materials and three construction companies: Cemex, Martin Marietta & Vulcan.

In this package, SpaceKnow tracks manufacturing and processing facilities for construction material products all over the US. By tracking these facilities, we are able to give you near-real-time data on spending on these materials, which helps to predict residential and commercial real estate construction and spending in the US.

The dataset includes 40 indices focused on asphalt, cement, concrete, and building materials in general. You can look forward to receiving country-level and regional data (activity in the North, East, West, and South of the country) and the aforementioned company data.

SpaceKnow uses satellite (SAR) data to capture activity and building material manufacturing and processing facilities in the US.

Data is updated daily, has an average lag of 4-6 days, and history back to 2017.

The insights provide you with level and change data for refineries, storage, manufacturing, logistics, and employee parking-based locations.

SpaceKnow offers 3 delivery options: CSV, API, and Insights Dashboard

Available Indices Companies: Cemex (CX): Construction Materials (covers all manufacturing facilities of the company in the US), Concrete, Cement (refinery and storage) indices, and aggregates Martin Marietta (MLM): Construction Materials (covers all manufacturing facilities of the company in the US), Concrete, Cement (refinery and storage) indices, and aggregates Vulcan (VMC): Construction Materials (covers all manufacturing facilities of the company in the US), Concrete, Cement (refinery and storage) indices, and aggregates

USA Indices:

Aggregates USA Asphalt USA Cement USA Cement Refinery USA Cement Storage USA Concrete USA Construction Materials USA Construction Mining USA Construction Parking Lots USA Construction Materials Transfer Hub US Cement - Midwest, Northeast, South, West Cement Refinery - Midwest, Northeast, South, West Cement Storage - Midwest, Northeast, South, West

Why get SpaceKnow's U.S Construction Materials Package?

Monitor Construction Market Trends: Near-real-time insights into the construction industry allow clients to understand and anticipate market trends better.

Track Companies Performance: Monitor the operational activities, such as the volume of sales

Assess Risk: Use satellite activity data to assess the risks associated with investing in the construction industry.

Index Methodology Summary Continuous Feed Index (CFI) is a daily aggregation of the area of metallic objects in square meters. There are two types of CFI indices; CFI-R index gives the data in levels. It shows how many square meters are covered by metallic objects (for example employee cars at a facility). CFI-S index gives the change in data. It shows how many square meters have changed within the locations between two consecutive satellite images.

How to interpret the data SpaceKnow indices can be compared with the related economic indicators or KPIs. If the economic indicator is in monthly terms, perform a 30-day rolling sum and pick the last day of the month to compare with the economic indicator. Each data point will reflect approximately the sum of the month. If the economic indicator is in quarterly terms, perform a 90-day rolling sum and pick the last day of the 90-day to compare with the economic indicator. Each data point will reflect approximately the sum of the quarter.

Where the data comes from SpaceKnow brings you the data edge by applying machine learning and AI algorithms to synthetic aperture radar and optical satellite imagery. The company’s infrastructure searches and downloads new imagery every day, and the computations of the data take place within less than 24 hours.

In contrast to traditional economic data, which are released in monthly and quarterly terms, SpaceKnow data is high-frequency and available daily. It is possible to observe the latest movements in the construction industry with just a 4-6 day lag, on average.

The construction materials data help you to estimate the performance of the construction sector and the business activity of the selected companies.

The foundation of delivering high-quality data is based on the success of defining each location to observe and extract the data. All locations are thoroughly researched and validated by an in-house team of annotators and data analysts.

See below how our Construction Materials index performs against the US Non-residential construction spending benchmark

Each individual location is precisely defined to avoid noise in the data, which may arise from traffic or changing vegetation due to seasonal reasons.

SpaceKnow uses radar imagery and its own unique algorithms, so the indices do not lose their significance in bad weather conditions such as rain or heavy clouds.

→ Reach out to get free trial

...

The USAID Activities dataset is a snapshot of activities supported by USAID including their geographical locations within countries at the time of the snapshot. The data were used to create the map.usaid.gov web site on the Where We Work page. Only a subset of USAID's field offices provided data and many provided data on only a part of their portfolios. Efforts are underway to harmonize the way data are collected by USAID missions which, when completed, will facilitate the display of a comprehensive portfolio of USAID activities. The geographic names and boundaries in this dataset may not reflect the views of the United States Government on the sovereignty over geographic features. This spreadsheet contains descriptions of activities.

This dataset provides an in-depth view of any specific company’s truck-based supply chain and its relationships with other facilities and companies within the continental US. We map US facilities (including factories, warehouses, and retail outlets) to companies. With this dataset, it is possible to track the movement of trucks and devices between locations to identify supply chain connections. Machine learning algorithms ingest 7-15bn daily events to estimate the volume of goods transported between locations. Consequently, we can map supply chain connections between: •Different companies (expressed as a percentage of volume transported). •Locations owned by the same company (e.g. warehouse to shop). With this novel geolocation approach, it is possible to "draw" a knowledge graph of any private or public company´s relations with other companies within the country. This solution, in the form of a dataset, provides an in-depth view into any specific company’s truck-based supply chain and its relationships with other facilities and companies within the continental United States. Use cases: - Identification and understanding of relations company-to-company: It helps to identify and infer relationships and connections between specific companies or facilities and between sectors/industries. - Identification and understanding of relations place-to-place: A logistics and domestic distribution supply chain can be mapped, both nationwide and state-wide in the US, and across countries in Europe. - Visualization and mapping of an entire supply chain network. - Tracking of products in any distribution or supply chain. - Risk assessment - Correlation analysis. - Disruption analysis. - Analysis of illicit networks and tracking of illegal use of corporate assets. - Improvement of casualty risk management. - Optimization of supply chain risk management. - Security and compliance. - Identification of not only the first tier of suppliers in the value chain, but also 2nd and 3rd tier suppliers, and more. Current largest use case: global corporation using it to model risk at a facility level (+100,000 locations).