The global smartphone penetration in was forecast to continuously increase between 2024 and 2029 by in total 20.3 percentage points. After the fifteenth consecutive increasing year, the penetration is estimated to reach 74.98 percent and therefore a new peak in 2029. Notably, the smartphone penetration of was continuously increasing over the past years.The penetration rate refers to the share of the total population.The shown data are an excerpt of Statista's Key Market Indicators (KMI). The KMI are a collection of primary and secondary indicators on the macro-economic, demographic and technological environment in up to 150 countries and regions worldwide. All indicators are sourced from international and national statistical offices, trade associations and the trade press and they are processed to generate comparable data sets (see supplementary notes under details for more information).Find more key insights for the smartphone penetration in countries like North America and the Americas.

The number of smartphone users in the United States was forecast to continuously increase between 2024 and 2029 by in total 17.4 million users (+5.61 percent). After the fifteenth consecutive increasing year, the smartphone user base is estimated to reach 327.54 million users and therefore a new peak in 2029. Notably, the number of smartphone users of was continuously increasing over the past years.Smartphone users here are limited to internet users of any age using a smartphone. The shown figures have been derived from survey data that has been processed to estimate missing demographics.The shown data are an excerpt of Statista's Key Market Indicators (KMI). The KMI are a collection of primary and secondary indicators on the macro-economic, demographic and technological environment in up to 150 countries and regions worldwide. All indicators are sourced from international and national statistical offices, trade associations and the trade press and they are processed to generate comparable data sets (see supplementary notes under details for more information).Find more key insights for the number of smartphone users in countries like Mexico and Canada.

Description for each of the variables:

1. Brands: The brands of smartphones included in the dataset.
2. Colors: The colors available for the smartphones.
3. Memory: The storage capacity of the smartphones, typically measured in gigabytes (GB) or megabytes (MB).
4. Storage: The internal storage capacity of the smartphones, often measured in gigabytes (GB) or megabytes (MB).
5. Rating: The user ratings or scores assigned to the smartphones, reflecting user satisfaction or performance.
6. Selling Price: The price at which the smartphones are sold to consumers.
7. Original Price: The original or list price of the smartphones before any discounts or promotions.
8. Mobile: Indicates whether the device is a mobile phone.
9. Discount: The discount applied to the original price to calculate the selling price.
10. Discount percentage: The percentage discount applied to the original price to calculate the selling price.

The global number of smartphone users in was forecast to continuously increase between 2024 and 2029 by in total *** billion users (+***** percent). After the fifteenth consecutive increasing year, the smartphone user base is estimated to reach *** billion users and therefore a new peak in 2029. Notably, the number of smartphone users of was continuously increasing over the past years.Smartphone users here are limited to internet users of any age using a smartphone. The shown figures have been derived from survey data that has been processed to estimate missing demographics.The shown data are an excerpt of Statista's Key Market Indicators (KMI). The KMI are a collection of primary and secondary indicators on the macro-economic, demographic and technological environment in up to *** countries and regions worldwide. All indicators are sourced from international and national statistical offices, trade associations and the trade press and they are processed to generate comparable data sets (see supplementary notes under details for more information).Find more key insights for the number of smartphone users in countries like the Americas and Asia.

China is leading the ranking by number of smartphone users, recording ****** million users. Following closely behind is India with ****** million users, while Seychelles is trailing the ranking with **** million users, resulting in a difference of ****** million users to the ranking leader, China. Smartphone users here are limited to internet users of any age using a smartphone. The shown figures have been derived from survey data that has been processed to estimate missing demographics.The shown data are an excerpt of Statista's Key Market Indicators (KMI). The KMI are a collection of primary and secondary indicators on the macro-economic, demographic and technological environment in up to 150 countries and regions worldwide. All indicators are sourced from international and national statistical offices, trade associations and the trade press and they are processed to generate comparable data sets (see supplementary notes under details for more information).

In 2022, smartphone vendors sold around 1.39 billion smartphones were sold worldwide, with this number forecast to drop to 1.34 billion in 2023.

Smartphone penetration rate still on the rise

Less than half of the world’s total population owned a smart device in 2016, but the smartphone penetration rate has continued climbing, reaching 78.05 percent in 2020. By 2025, it is forecast that almost 87 percent of all mobile users in the United States will own a smartphone, an increase from the 27 percent of mobile users in 2010.

Smartphone end user sales

In the United States alone, sales of smartphones were projected to be worth around 73 billion U.S. dollars in 2021, an increase from 18 billion dollars in 2010. Global sales of smartphones are expected to increase from 2020 to 2021 in every major region, as the market starts to recover from the initial impact of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic.

Model:

Description: The name of the smartphone model. Example: "Samsung Galaxy S21", "iPhone 13", "Google Pixel 6". Notes: This is a categorical variable that uniquely identifies each phone. Price:

Description: The cost of the smartphone, typically in the local currency (e.g., USD). Example: 999, 799, 699. Notes: This is a numerical variable, which can be used to analyze the affordability and market positioning of different models. RAM:

Description: The amount of random-access memory (RAM) in the smartphone, typically measured in gigabytes (GB). Example: 4 GB, 8 GB, 12 GB. Notes: This numerical variable impacts the phone's ability to handle multiple tasks simultaneously and affects overall performance. Display:

Description: The specifications of the smartphone's display, often given in terms of size (in inches) and resolution. Example: "6.1 inches, 1080x2400 pixels". Notes: This variable is usually a mix of numerical and categorical data, reflecting the screen size and resolution. Rear Camera:

Description: The specifications of the main (rear) camera(s), often including the number of cameras, megapixels (MP), and other features (e.g., wide-angle, telephoto). Example: "12 MP + 12 MP dual", "108 MP". Notes: This is often a categorical variable with numerical components, indicating the camera's capabilities. Front Camera:

Description: The specifications of the front (selfie) camera, typically measured in megapixels. Example: "10 MP", "32 MP". Notes: Similar to the rear camera, this is a categorical variable with numerical components, indicating the quality of the front camera. Battery:

Description: The battery capacity of the smartphone, typically measured in milliampere-hours (mAh). Example: 4000 mAh, 5000 mAh. Notes: This numerical variable impacts the phone's battery life and usage duration. Processor:

Description: The type and model of the smartphone's processor (CPU). Example: "Snapdragon 888", "Apple A14 Bionic". Notes: This categorical variable indicates the processing power and efficiency of the phone. Star Ratings:

Description: The average user rating of the smartphone, typically on a scale from 1 to 5 stars. Example: 4.5, 3.8. Notes: This numerical variable reflects user satisfaction and can be used to gauge the overall reception of the phone. Ratings:

Description: The total number of user ratings received for the smartphone. Example: 1500, 5000. Notes: This numerical variable indicates the popularity and extent of user feedback.

If using the dataset professionally, please attribute Counterpoint Research. Dataset is a single csv files with quarterly smartphone shipment counts for major manufacturers; it also provides a total for smaller manufacturers.

The global number of smartphone users in was forecast to continuously increase between 2024 and 2029 by in total 1.8 billion users (+42.62 percent). After the ninth consecutive increasing year, the smartphone user base is estimated to reach 6.1 billion users and therefore a new peak in 2029. Notably, the number of smartphone users of was continuously increasing over the past years.Smartphone users here are limited to internet users of any age using a smartphone. The shown figures have been derived from survey data that has been processed to estimate missing demographics.The shown data are an excerpt of Statista's Key Market Indicators (KMI). The KMI are a collection of primary and secondary indicators on the macro-economic, demographic and technological environment in up to 150 countries and regions worldwide. All indicators are sourced from international and national statistical offices, trade associations and the trade press and they are processed to generate comparable data sets (see supplementary notes under details for more information).Find more key insights for the number of smartphone users in countries like Australia & Oceania and Asia.

Sector: 01. Ending all forms of poverty in the world

Algorithm: Males aged 6 years and over who use their mobile phones every day out of the total number of males aged 6 years and over * 100

Phenomenon: Stock

This competition involves advertisement data provided by BuzzCity Pte. Ltd. BuzzCity is a global mobile advertising network that has millions of consumers around the world on mobile phones and devices. In Q1 2012, over 45 billion ad banners were delivered across the BuzzCity network consisting of more than 10,000 publisher sites which reach an average of over 300 million unique users per month. The number of smartphones active on the network has also grown significantly. Smartphones now account for more than 32% phones that are served advertisements across the BuzzCity network. The "raw" data used in this competition has two types: publisher database and click database, both provided in CSV format. The publisher database records the publisher's (aka partner's) profile and comprises several fields:

publisherid - Unique identifier of a publisher. Bankaccount - Bank account associated with a publisher (may be empty) address - Mailing address of a publisher (obfuscated; may be empty) status - Label of a publisher, which can be the following: "OK" - Publishers whom BuzzCity deems as having healthy traffic (or those who slipped their detection mechanisms) "Observation" - Publishers who may have just started their traffic or their traffic statistics deviates from system wide average. BuzzCity does not have any conclusive stand with these publishers yet "Fraud" - Publishers who are deemed as fraudulent with clear proof. Buzzcity suspends their accounts and their earnings will not be paid

On the other hand, the click database records the click traffics and has several fields:

id - Unique identifier of a particular click numericip - Public IP address of a clicker/visitor deviceua - Phone model used by a clicker/visitor publisherid - Unique identifier of a publisher adscampaignid - Unique identifier of a given advertisement campaign usercountry - Country from which the surfer is clicktime - Timestamp of a given click (in YYYY-MM-DD format) publisherchannel - Publisher's channel type, which can be the following: ad - Adult sites co - Community es - Entertainment and lifestyle gd - Glamour and dating in - Information mc - Mobile content pp - Premium portal se - Search, portal, services referredurl - URL where the ad banners were clicked (obfuscated; may be empty). More details about the HTTP Referer protocol can be found in this article. Related Publication: R. J. Oentaryo, E.-P. Lim, M. Finegold, D. Lo, F.-D. Zhu, C. Phua, E.-Y. Cheu, G.-E. Yap, K. Sim, M. N. Nguyen, K. Perera, B. Neupane, M. Faisal, Z.-Y. Aung, W. L. Woon, W. Chen, D. Patel, and D. Berrar. (2014). Detecting click fraud in online advertising: A data mining approach, Journal of Machine Learning Research, 15, 99-140.

The data set provides estimates of country-level daily mobility metrics (uncertainty included) for 17 countries from March 11, 2020 to present. Estimates are based on more than 3.8 million smartphone trajectories.

• Metrics:
  • Estimated daily average travelled distance by people.
  • Estimated percentage of people who did not move during the 24 hours of the day.
• Countries: Argentina (ARG), Chile (CHL), Colombia (COL), Costa Rica (CRI), Ecuador (ECU), Greece (GRC), Guatemala (GTM), Italy (ITA), Mexico (MEX), Nicaragua (NIC), Panama (PAN), Peru (PER), Philippines (PHL), Slovenia (SVN), Turkey (TUR), United States (USA) and Venezuela (VEN).
• Covered period: from March 11, 2020 to present.
• Temporal resolution: daily.
• Temporal smoothing:
  • No smoothing.
  • 7-day moving average.
  • 14-day moving average.
  • 21-day moving average.
  • 28-day moving average.
• Uncertainty: 95% bootstrap confidence interval.

Data ownership

Anonymized data on smartphone trajectories are collected, owned and managed by Futura Innovation SRL. Smartphone trajectories are stored and analyzed on servers owned by Futura Innovation SRL and not shared with third parties, including the author of this repository and his organization (University of Bergamo).

Contribution

• Ilaria Cremonesi of Futura Innovation SRL is the data owner and data manager.
• Francesco Finazzi of University of Bergamo developed the statistical methodology for the data analysis and the algorithms implemented on Futura Innovation SRL servers.

The global smartphone penetration rate was estimated at ** percent in 2024, up from 2023. This is based on an estimated *** billion smartphone subscriptions worldwide and a global population of around *** billion. Regional differences in smartphone penetration Throughout the world, the smartphone penetration rate in the general population varies greatly. For example, in North America and Europe, the smartphone adoption rate stands at roughly ** and ** percent, respectively. Whereas in Sub-Saharan Africa, the same rate only stands at ** percent as of late 2023, showing a roughly ** percent difference in adoption rates between the highest and lowest ranked regions. Global smartphone shipments The number of global smartphone shipments saw a drop in recent years. However, the number of shipments is expected to recover to previous levels in the upcoming years. Most recently, Samsung and Apple have been leading the share of smartphone shipments worldwide, with other competitors such as Xiaomi and Oppo are catching up. Most of the top contributors to the smartphone market are concentrated in the Asia-Pacific region, which is also the region is the one with the most smartphone sales to end users as a whole.

Object recognition predominately still relies on many high-quality training examples per object category. In contrast, learning new objects from only a few examples could enable many impactful applications from robotics to user personalization. Most few-shot learning research, however, has been driven by benchmark datasets that lack the high variation that these applications will face when deployed in the real-world. To close this gap, we present the ORBIT dataset, grounded in a real-world application of teachable object recognizers for people who are blind/low vision. We provide a full, unfiltered dataset of 4,733 videos of 588 objects recorded by 97 people who are blind/low-vision on their mobile phones, and a benchmark dataset of 3,822 videos of 486 objects collected by 77 collectors. The code for loading the dataset, computing all benchmark metrics, and running the baseline models is available at https://github.com/microsoft/ORBIT-DatasetThis version comprises several zip files:- train, validation, test: benchmark dataset, organised by collector, with raw videos split into static individual frames in jpg format at 30FPS- other: data not in the benchmark set, organised by collector, with raw videos split into static individual frames in jpg format at 30FPS (please note that the train, validation, test, and other files make up the unfiltered dataset)- *_224: as for the benchmark, but static individual frames are scaled down to 224 pixels.- *_unfiltered_videos: full unfiltered dataset, organised by collector, in mp4 format.

acquired from six different smartphones under diverse real-world conditions.## 📱 Devices Used

Almende Continuous Real-world Activities with on-body smartphones Sensors Data Set.

The dataset combines accelerometer data with visual data for the purpose of segmentation. It can also be used for activity classification.

This dataset has been created for the master thesis "Temporal Segmentation using Support Vector Machines in the context of Human Activity Recognition" by Roemer Vlasveld.

Download pdf

Sign Up for a free trial: https://rampedup.io/sign-up-%2F-log-in - 7 Days and 50 Credits to test our quality and accuracy.

These are the fields available within the RampedUp Global dataset.

CONTACT DATA: Personal Email Address - We manage over 115 million personal email addresses Professional Email - We manage over 200 million professional email addresses Home Address - We manage over 20 million home addresses Mobile Phones - 65 million direct lines to decision makers Social Profiles - Individual Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn Local Address - We manage 65M locations for local office mailers, event-based marketing or face-to-face sales calls.

JOB DATA: Job Title - Standardized titles for ease of use and selection Company Name - The Contact's current employer Job Function - The Company Department associated with the job role Title Level - The Level in the Company associated with the job role Job Start Date - Identify people new to their role as a potential buyer

EMPLOYER DATA: Websites - Company Website, Root Domain, or Full Domain Addresses - Standardized Address, City, Region, Postal Code, and Country Phone - E164 phone with country code Social Profiles - LinkedIn, CrunchBase, Facebook, and Twitter

FIRMOGRAPHIC DATA: Industry - 420 classifications for categorizing the company’s main field of business Sector - 20 classifications for categorizing company industries 4 Digit SIC Code - 239 classifications and their definitions 6 Digit NAICS - 452 classifications and their definitions Revenue - Estimated revenue and bands from 1M to over 1B Employee Size - Exact employee count and bands Email Open Scores - Aggregated data at the domain level showing relationships between email opens and corporate domains. IP Address -Company level IP Addresses associated to Domains from a DNS lookup

CONSUMER DATA: Education - Alma Mater, Degree, Graduation Date Skills - Accumulated Skills associated with work experience
Interests - Known interests of contact Connections - Number of social connections. Followers - Number of social followers

Download our data dictionary: https://rampedup.io/our-data

We are publishing a walking activity dataset including inertial and positioning information from 19 volunteers, including reference distance measured using a trundle wheel. The dataset includes a total of 96.7 Km walked by the volunteers, split into 203 separate tracks. The trundle wheel is of two types: it is either an analogue trundle wheel, which provides the total amount of meters walked in a single track, or it is a sensorized trundle wheel, which measures every revolution of the wheel, therefore recording a continuous incremental distance.
Each track has data from the accelerometer and gyroscope embedded in the phones, location information from the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS), and the step count obtained by the device. The dataset can be used to implement walking distance estimation algorithms and to explore data quality in the context of walking activity and physical capacity tests, fitness, and pedestrian navigation. Methods The proposed dataset is a collection of walks where participants used their own smartphones to capture inertial and positioning information. The participants involved in the data collection come from two sites. The first site is the Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom, where 10 participants (7 affected by cardiovascular diseases and 3 healthy individuals) performed unsupervised 6MWTs in an outdoor environment of their choice (ethical approval obtained by the UK National Health Service Health Research Authority protocol reference numbers: 17/WM/0355). All participants involved provided informed consent. The second site is at Malm ̈o University, in Sweden, where a group of 9 healthy researchers collected data. This dataset can be used by researchers to develop distance estimation algorithms and how data quality impacts the estimation.

All walks were performed by holding a smartphone in one hand, with an app collecting inertial data, the GNSS signal, and the step counting. On the other free hand, participants held a trundle wheel to obtain the ground truth distance. Two different trundle wheels were used: an analogue trundle wheel that allowed the registration of a total single value of walked distance, and a sensorized trundle wheel which collected timestamps and distance at every 1-meter revolution, resulting in continuous incremental distance information. The latter configuration is innovative and allows the use of temporal windows of the IMU data as input to machine learning algorithms to estimate walked distance. In the case of data collected by researchers, if the walks were done simultaneously and at a close distance from each other, only one person used the trundle wheel, and the reference distance was associated with all walks that were collected at the same time.The walked paths are of variable length, duration, and shape. Participants were instructed to walk paths of increasing curvature, from straight to rounded. Irregular paths are particularly useful in determining limitations in the accuracy of walked distance algorithms. Two smartphone applications were developed for collecting the information of interest from the participants' devices, both available for Android and iOS operating systems. The first is a web-application that retrieves inertial data (acceleration, rotation rate, orientation) while connecting to the sensorized trundle wheel to record incremental reference distance [1]. The second app is the Timed Walk app [2], which guides the user in performing a walking test by signalling when to start and when to stop the walk while collecting both inertial and positioning data. All participants in the UK used the Timed Walk app.

The data collected during the walk is from the Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) of the phone and, when available, the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS). In addition, the step count information is retrieved by the sensors embedded in each participant’s smartphone. With the dataset, we provide a descriptive table with the characteristics of each recording, including brand and model of the smartphone, duration, reference total distance, types of signals included and additionally scoring some relevant parameters related to the quality of the various signals. The path curvature is one of the most relevant parameters. Previous literature from our team, in fact, confirmed the negative impact of curved-shaped paths with the use of multiple distance estimation algorithms [3]. We visually inspected the walked paths and clustered them in three groups, a) straight path, i.e. no turns wider than 90 degrees, b) gently curved path, i.e. between one and five turns wider than 90 degrees, and c) curved path, i.e. more than five turns wider than 90 degrees. Other features relevant to the quality of collected signals are the total amount of time above a threshold (0.05s and 6s) where, respectively, inertial and GNSS data were missing due to technical issues or due to the app going in the background thus losing access to the sensors, sampling frequency of different data streams, average walking speed and the smartphone position. The start of each walk is set as 0 ms, thus not reporting time-related information. Walks locations collected in the UK are anonymized using the following approach: the first position is fixed to a central location of the city of Oxford (latitude: 51.7520, longitude: -1.2577) and all other positions are reassigned by applying a translation along the longitudinal and latitudinal axes which maintains the original distance and angle between samples. This way, the exact geographical location is lost, but the path shape and distances between samples are maintained. The difference between consecutive points “as the crow flies” and path curvature was numerically and visually inspected to obtain the same results as the original walks. Computations were made possible by using the Haversine Python library.

Multiple datasets are available regarding walking activity recognition among other daily living tasks. However, few studies are published with datasets that focus on the distance for both indoor and outdoor environments and that provide relevant ground truth information for it. Yan et al. [4] introduced an inertial walking dataset within indoor scenarios using a smartphone placed in 4 positions (on the leg, in a bag, in the hand, and on the body) by six healthy participants. The reference measurement used in this study is a Visual Odometry System embedded in a smartphone that has to be worn at the chest level, using a strap to hold it. While interesting and detailed, this dataset lacks GNSS data, which is likely to be used in outdoor scenarios, and the reference used for localization also suffers from accuracy issues, especially outdoors. Vezovcnik et al. [5] analysed estimation models for step length and provided an open-source dataset for a total of 22 km of only inertial walking data from 15 healthy adults. While relevant, their dataset focuses on steps rather than total distance and was acquired on a treadmill, which limits the validity in real-world scenarios. Kang et al. [6] proposed a way to estimate travelled distance by using an Android app that uses outdoor walking patterns to match them in indoor contexts for each participant. They collect data outdoors by including both inertial and positioning information and they use average values of speed obtained by the GPS data as reference labels. Afterwards, they use deep learning models to estimate walked distance obtaining high performances. Their results share that 3% to 11% of the data for each participant was discarded due to low quality. Unfortunately, the name of the used app is not reported and the paper does not mention if the dataset can be made available.

This dataset is heterogeneous under multiple aspects. It includes a majority of healthy participants, therefore, it is not possible to generalize the outcomes from this dataset to all walking styles or physical conditions. The dataset is heterogeneous also from a technical perspective, given the difference in devices, acquired data, and used smartphone apps (i.e. some tests lack IMU or GNSS, sampling frequency in iPhone was particularly low). We suggest selecting the appropriate track based on desired characteristics to obtain reliable and consistent outcomes.

This dataset allows researchers to develop algorithms to compute walked distance and to explore data quality and reliability in the context of the walking activity. This dataset was initiated to investigate the digitalization of the 6MWT, however, the collected information can also be useful for other physical capacity tests that involve walking (distance- or duration-based), or for other purposes such as fitness, and pedestrian navigation.

The article related to this dataset will be published in the proceedings of the IEEE MetroXRAINE 2024 conference, held in St. Albans, UK, 21-23 October.

This research is partially funded by the Swedish Knowledge Foundation and the Internet of Things and People research center through the Synergy project Intelligent and Trustworthy IoT Systems.

5348 Global import shipment records of Mobile Phone with prices, volume & current Buyer's suppliers relationships based on actual Global export trade database.

Apple is one of the most influential and recognisable brands in the world, responsible for the rise of the smartphone with the iPhone. Valued at over $2 trillion in 2021, it is also the most valuable...