41 datasets found
  1. Chegg Stock Prices and ChatGPT User Growth

    • kaggle.com
    Updated May 6, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    r1shabhgupta (2023). Chegg Stock Prices and ChatGPT User Growth [Dataset]. https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/r1shabhgupta/chegg-stock-prices-and-chatgpt-user-growth
    Explore at:
    CroissantCroissant is a format for machine-learning datasets. Learn more about this at mlcommons.org/croissant.
    Dataset updated
    May 6, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Kagglehttp://kaggle.com/
    Authors
    r1shabhgupta
    License

    https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

    Description

    The dataset is focused on exploring the relationship between the performance of Chegg's stock prices and the growth of ChatGPT users over time. Chegg is an education technology company that provides online learning resources. The company has experienced significant growth in recent years, driven in part by COVID-19.

    However, Chegg's stock price dropped due to the shift of some of its users from Chegg's platform to ChatGPT. This shift in user behavior can be attributed to ChatGPT's advanced AI capabilities, which allow it to provide personalized and accurate assistance to users.

    The dataset includes five tables that provide valuable insights into the relationship between Chegg stock prices and ChatGPT user growth, with a particular focus on the impact of the user shift on Chegg's stock performance. The first three tables contain weekly, monthly, and daily data on Chegg's stock performance, including information on the opening and closing prices, highest and lowest prices, and trading volume. These tables also include information on significant events that may have impacted the company's stock prices, such as product launches, partnerships, and earnings reports.

    The fourth table provides data on the number of ChatGPT users recorded over the past months. This table includes information on the total number of users, as well as data on user growth rates and trends. The data in this table can be used to identify correlations between ChatGPT user growth and changes in Chegg's stock performance.

    The fifth and final table provides the latest updates on ChatGPT, including information on new features, updates, and user feedback. This table is designed to keep the dataset current and relevant, providing users with the latest information on ChatGPT and its impact on Chegg's stock performance.

    Overall, this dataset provides a valuable resource for anyone interested in understanding the impact of user behavior on the stock performance of companies like Chegg that operate in the education technology sector. It offers a comprehensive view of the data and trends over time, which can be used to identify patterns and correlations that can inform investment decisions and strategic planning.

  2. e

    ChatGPT Usage by Age Group – Survey Data

    • expresslegalfunding.com
    html
    Updated May 2, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Express Legal Funding (2025). ChatGPT Usage by Age Group – Survey Data [Dataset]. https://expresslegalfunding.com/chatgpt-study/
    Explore at:
    htmlAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    May 2, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Express Legal Funding
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Variables measured
    60+, 18–29, 30–44, 45–60
    Description

    This dataset presents ChatGPT usage patterns across different age groups, showing the percentage of users who have followed its advice, used it without following advice, or have never used it, based on a 2025 U.S. survey.

  3. Datasets .csv

    • figshare.com
    txt
    Updated Jan 24, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Yaser Alhasawi (2024). Datasets .csv [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.25053146.v1
    Explore at:
    txtAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jan 24, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    figshare
    Authors
    Yaser Alhasawi
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    The dataset for this research project was meticulously constructed to investigate the adoption of ChatGPT among students in the United States. The primary objective was to gain insights into the technological barriers and resistances faced by students in integrating ChatGPT into their information systems. The dataset was designed to capture the diverse adoption patterns among students in various public and private schools and universities across the United States. By examining adoption rates, frequency of usage, and the contexts in which ChatGPT is employed, the research sought to provide a comprehensive understanding of how students are incorporating this technology into their information systems. Moreover, by including participants from diverse educational institutions, the research sought to ensure a comprehensive representation of the student population in the United States. This approach aimed to provide nuanced insights into how factors such as educational background, institution type, and technological familiarity influence ChatGPT adoption.

  4. e

    ChatGPT Trust Levels by Advice Category – Survey Data

    • expresslegalfunding.com
    html
    Updated May 2, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Express Legal Funding (2025). ChatGPT Trust Levels by Advice Category – Survey Data [Dataset]. https://expresslegalfunding.com/chatgpt-study/
    Explore at:
    htmlAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    May 2, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Express Legal Funding
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Variables measured
    Legal Advice, Career Advice, Educational Help, Financial Advice, Medical Information, Relationship Advice, Mental Health Topics, News / Current Events, Product Recommendations
    Description

    This dataset presents how much users trust ChatGPT across different advice categories, including career, education, financial, legal, and medical advice, based on a 2025 U.S. survey.

  5. S

    Test dataset of ChatGPT in medical field

    • scidb.cn
    Updated Mar 3, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    robin shen (2023). Test dataset of ChatGPT in medical field [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.57760/sciencedb.o00130.00001
    Explore at:
    CroissantCroissant is a format for machine-learning datasets. Learn more about this at mlcommons.org/croissant.
    Dataset updated
    Mar 3, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Science Data Bank
    Authors
    robin shen
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    The researcher tests the QA capability of ChatGPT in the medical field from the following aspects:1. Test their reserve capacity for medical knowledge2. Check their ability to read literature and understand medical literature3. Test their ability of auxiliary diagnosis after reading case data4. Test its error correction ability for case data5. Test its ability to standardize medical terms6. Test their evaluation ability to experts7. Check their ability to evaluate medical institutionsThe conclusion is:ChatGPT has great potential in the application of medical and health care, and may directly replace human beings or even professionals at a certain level in some fields;The researcher preliminarily believe that ChatGPT has basic medical knowledge and the ability of multiple rounds of dialogue, and its ability to understand Chinese is not weak;ChatGPT has the ability to read, understand and correct cases;ChatGPT has the ability of information extraction and terminology standardization, and is quite excellent;ChatGPT has the reasoning ability of medical knowledge;ChatGPT has the ability of continuous learning. After continuous training, its level has improved significantly;ChatGPT does not have the academic evaluation ability of Chinese medical talents, and the results are not ideal;ChatGPT does not have the academic evaluation ability of Chinese medical institutions, and the results are not ideal;ChatGPT is an epoch-making product, which can become a useful assistant for medical diagnosis and treatment, knowledge service, literature reading, review and paper writing.

  6. m

    The Impact of AI and ChatGPT on Bangladeshi University Students

    • data.mendeley.com
    Updated Jan 6, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Md Jhirul Islam (2025). The Impact of AI and ChatGPT on Bangladeshi University Students [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.17632/zykphpvbr7.2
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jan 6, 2025
    Authors
    Md Jhirul Islam
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Bangladesh
    Description

    The data set records the perceptions of Bangladeshi university students on the influence that AI tools, especially ChatGPT, have on their academic practices, learning experiences, and problem-solving abilities. The varying role of AI in education, which covers common usage statistics, what AI does to our creative abilities, its impact on our learning, and whether it could invade our privacy. This dataset reveals perspective on how AI tools are changing education in the country and offering valuable information for researchers, educators, policymakers, to understand trends, challenges, and opportunities in the adoption of AI in the academic contex.

    Methodology Data Collection Method: Online survey using google from Participants: A total of 3,512 students from various Bangladeshi universities participated. Survey Questions:The survey included questions on demographic information, frequency of AI tool usage, perceived benefits, concerns regarding privacy, and impacts on creativity and learning.

    Sampling Technique: Random sampling of university students Data Collection Period: June 2024 to December 2024

    Privacy Compliance This dataset has been anonymized to remove any personally identifiable information (PII). It adheres to relevant privacy regulations to ensure the confidentiality of participants.

    For further inquiries, please contact: Name: Md Jhirul Islam, Daffodil International University Email: jhirul15-4063@diu.edu.bd Phone: 01316317573

  7. e

    Types of ChatGPT Advice Used – Survey Data

    • expresslegalfunding.com
    html
    Updated May 2, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Express Legal Funding (2025). Types of ChatGPT Advice Used – Survey Data [Dataset]. https://expresslegalfunding.com/chatgpt-study/
    Explore at:
    htmlAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    May 2, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Express Legal Funding
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Variables measured
    Legal Advice, Career Advice, Educational Help, Financial Advice, Medical Information, Relationship Advice, Mental Health Topics, News / Current Events, Product Recommendations
    Description

    This dataset shows the types of advice users sought from ChatGPT based on a 2025 U.S. survey, including education, financial, medical, and legal topics.

  8. e

    ChatGPT Usage by U.S. Census Region – Survey Data

    • expresslegalfunding.com
    html
    Updated May 2, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Express Legal Funding (2025). ChatGPT Usage by U.S. Census Region – Survey Data [Dataset]. https://expresslegalfunding.com/chatgpt-study/
    Explore at:
    htmlAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    May 2, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Express Legal Funding
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Variables measured
    Pacific, Mountain, New England, South Atlantic, Middle Atlantic, East North Central, East South Central, West North Central, West South Central
    Description

    This dataset presents ChatGPT usage patterns across U.S. Census regions, based on a 2025 nationwide survey. It tracks how often users followed, partially used, or never used ChatGPT by state region.

  9. h

    awesome-chatgpt-prompts

    • huggingface.co
    Updated Dec 15, 2023
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Fatih Kadir Akın (2023). awesome-chatgpt-prompts [Dataset]. https://huggingface.co/datasets/fka/awesome-chatgpt-prompts
    Explore at:
    CroissantCroissant is a format for machine-learning datasets. Learn more about this at mlcommons.org/croissant.
    Dataset updated
    Dec 15, 2023
    Authors
    Fatih Kadir Akın
    License

    https://choosealicense.com/licenses/cc0-1.0/https://choosealicense.com/licenses/cc0-1.0/

    Description

    🧠 Awesome ChatGPT Prompts [CSV dataset]

    This is a Dataset Repository of Awesome ChatGPT Prompts View All Prompts on GitHub

      License
    

    CC-0

  10. h

    ChatGPT-Gemini-Claude-Perplexity-Human-Evaluation-Multi-Aspects-Review-Dataset...

    • huggingface.co
    Updated Nov 12, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    DeepNLP (2024). ChatGPT-Gemini-Claude-Perplexity-Human-Evaluation-Multi-Aspects-Review-Dataset [Dataset]. https://huggingface.co/datasets/DeepNLP/ChatGPT-Gemini-Claude-Perplexity-Human-Evaluation-Multi-Aspects-Review-Dataset
    Explore at:
    CroissantCroissant is a format for machine-learning datasets. Learn more about this at mlcommons.org/croissant.
    Dataset updated
    Nov 12, 2024
    Authors
    DeepNLP
    License

    MIT Licensehttps://opensource.org/licenses/MIT
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    ChatGPT Gemini Claude Perplexity Human Evaluation Multi Aspect Review Dataset

      Introduction
    

    Human evaluation and reviews with scalar score of AI Services responses are very usefuly in LLM Finetuning, Human Preference Alignment, Few-Shot Learning, Bad Case Shooting, etc, but extremely difficult to collect. This dataset is collected from DeepNLP AI Service User Review panel (http://www.deepnlp.org/store), which is an open review website for users to give reviews and upload… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/DeepNLP/ChatGPT-Gemini-Claude-Perplexity-Human-Evaluation-Multi-Aspects-Review-Dataset.

  11. e

    Outcome of ChatGPT Advice – Survey Data

    • expresslegalfunding.com
    html
    Updated May 2, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Express Legal Funding (2025). Outcome of ChatGPT Advice – Survey Data [Dataset]. https://expresslegalfunding.com/chatgpt-study/
    Explore at:
    htmlAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    May 2, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Express Legal Funding
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Variables measured
    Unsure – Not sure yet, Helpful – It led to a good result, Neutral – It made no real difference, Harmful – It caused problems or a bad result
    Description

    This dataset summarizes how ChatGPT users rated the outcomes of the advice they received, including whether it was helpful, harmful, neutral, or uncertain, based on a 2025 U.S. survey.

  12. i

    "ChatGPT vs. Student: A Dataset for Source Classification of Computer...

    • ieee-dataport.org
    Updated Jul 19, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    ALI ABDULLAH S ALQAHTANI (2023). "ChatGPT vs. Student: A Dataset for Source Classification of Computer Science Answers [Dataset]. https://ieee-dataport.org/documents/chatgpt-vs-student-dataset-source-classification-computer-science-answers
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 19, 2023
    Authors
    ALI ABDULLAH S ALQAHTANI
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    along with the corresponding answers from students and ChatGPT.

  13. Z

    Data from: Dataset of the study: "Chatbots put to the test in math and logic...

    • data.niaid.nih.gov
    • zenodo.org
    Updated Jul 12, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Jiménez Rios, Alejandro (2024). Dataset of the study: "Chatbots put to the test in math and logic problems: A preliminary comparison and assessment of ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4, and Google Bard" [Dataset]. https://data.niaid.nih.gov/resources?id=zenodo_7940781
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 12, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    Papazafeiropoulos, George
    Jiménez Rios, Alejandro
    Plevris, Vagelis
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    This dataset contains the 30 questions that were posed to the chatbots (i) ChatGPT-3.5; (ii) ChatGPT-4; and (iii) Google Bard, in May 2023 for the study “Chatbots put to the test in math and logic problems: A preliminary comparison and assessment of ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4, and Google Bard”. These 30 questions describe mathematics and logic problems that have a unique correct answer. The questions are fully described with plain text only, without the need for any images or special formatting. The questions are divided into two sets of 15 questions each (Set A and Set B). The questions of Set A are 15 “Original” problems that cannot be found online, at least in their exact wording, while Set B contains 15 “Published” problems that one can find online by searching on the internet, usually with their solution. Each question is posed three times to each chatbot. This dataset contains the following: (i) The full set of the 30 questions, A01-A15 and B01-B15; (ii) the correct answer for each one of them; (iii) an explanation of the solution, for the problems where such an explanation is needed, (iv) the 30 (questions) × 3 (chatbots) × 3 (answers) = 270 detailed answers of the chatbots. For the published problems of Set B, we also provide a reference to the source where each problem was taken from.

  14. d

    Replication Data for: ChatGPT on ChatGPT: An Exploratory Analysis of its...

    • search.dataone.org
    Updated Sep 24, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Wang, Jieshu; Kiran, Elif; S.R. Aurora (also known as Mai P. Trinh); Simeone, Michael; Lobo, José (2024). Replication Data for: ChatGPT on ChatGPT: An Exploratory Analysis of its Performance in the Public Sector Workforce [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/P3CDHS
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Sep 24, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    Harvard Dataverse
    Authors
    Wang, Jieshu; Kiran, Elif; S.R. Aurora (also known as Mai P. Trinh); Simeone, Michael; Lobo, José
    Description

    This repository contains two datasets used in the study exploring the impact of Generative AI, specifically ChatGPT, on the public sector workforce in the United States. The datasets provide detailed information on the core tasks of public sector occupations and their estimated performance metrics, including potential for automation and augmentation by ChatGPT. These estimations are generated by OpenAI’s GPT-4 model (GPT-4-1106-preview) through OpenAI API.

  15. f

    Data_Sheet_1_Advanced large language models and visualization tools for data...

    • frontiersin.figshare.com
    txt
    Updated Aug 8, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Jorge Valverde-Rebaza; Aram González; Octavio Navarro-Hinojosa; Julieta Noguez (2024). Data_Sheet_1_Advanced large language models and visualization tools for data analytics learning.csv [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1418006.s001
    Explore at:
    txtAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Aug 8, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    Frontiers
    Authors
    Jorge Valverde-Rebaza; Aram González; Octavio Navarro-Hinojosa; Julieta Noguez
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    IntroductionIn recent years, numerous AI tools have been employed to equip learners with diverse technical skills such as coding, data analysis, and other competencies related to computational sciences. However, the desired outcomes have not been consistently achieved. This study aims to analyze the perspectives of students and professionals from non-computational fields on the use of generative AI tools, augmented with visualization support, to tackle data analytics projects. The focus is on promoting the development of coding skills and fostering a deep understanding of the solutions generated. Consequently, our research seeks to introduce innovative approaches for incorporating visualization and generative AI tools into educational practices.MethodsThis article examines how learners perform and their perspectives when using traditional tools vs. LLM-based tools to acquire data analytics skills. To explore this, we conducted a case study with a cohort of 59 participants among students and professionals without computational thinking skills. These participants developed a data analytics project in the context of a Data Analytics short session. Our case study focused on examining the participants' performance using traditional programming tools, ChatGPT, and LIDA with GPT as an advanced generative AI tool.ResultsThe results shown the transformative potential of approaches based on integrating advanced generative AI tools like GPT with specialized frameworks such as LIDA. The higher levels of participant preference indicate the superiority of these approaches over traditional development methods. Additionally, our findings suggest that the learning curves for the different approaches vary significantly. Since learners encountered technical difficulties in developing the project and interpreting the results. Our findings suggest that the integration of LIDA with GPT can significantly enhance the learning of advanced skills, especially those related to data analytics. We aim to establish this study as a foundation for the methodical adoption of generative AI tools in educational settings, paving the way for more effective and comprehensive training in these critical areas.DiscussionIt is important to highlight that when using general-purpose generative AI tools such as ChatGPT, users must be aware of the data analytics process and take responsibility for filtering out potential errors or incompleteness in the requirements of a data analytics project. These deficiencies can be mitigated by using more advanced tools specialized in supporting data analytics tasks, such as LIDA with GPT. However, users still need advanced programming knowledge to properly configure this connection via API. There is a significant opportunity for generative AI tools to improve their performance, providing accurate, complete, and convincing results for data analytics projects, thereby increasing user confidence in adopting these technologies. We hope this work underscores the opportunities and needs for integrating advanced LLMs into educational practices, particularly in developing computational thinking skills.

  16. e

    ChatGPT Usage by Gender – Survey Data

    • expresslegalfunding.com
    html
    Updated May 2, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Express Legal Funding (2025). ChatGPT Usage by Gender – Survey Data [Dataset]. https://expresslegalfunding.com/chatgpt-study/
    Explore at:
    htmlAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    May 2, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Express Legal Funding
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Variables measured
    Men, Women
    Description

    This dataset shows how men and women in the U.S. reported using ChatGPT in a 2025 survey, including whether they followed its advice or chose not to use it.

  17. Datasets and scripts related to the paper: "*Can Generative AI Help us in...

    • zenodo.org
    • explore.openaire.eu
    zip
    Updated Jul 30, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Anonymous Anonymous; Anonymous Anonymous (2024). Datasets and scripts related to the paper: "*Can Generative AI Help us in Qualitative Software Engineering?*" [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13134104
    Explore at:
    zipAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jul 30, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    Zenodohttp://zenodo.org/
    Authors
    Anonymous Anonymous; Anonymous Anonymous
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description
    This replication package contains datasets and scripts related to the paper: "*Can Generative AI Help us in Qualitative Software Engineering?*"
    The replication package is organized into two directories:
    - `manual_analysis`: This directory contains all sheets used to perform the manual analysis for RQ1, RQ2, and RQ3.
    - `stats`: This directory contains all datasets, scripts, and results metrics used for the quantitative analyses of RQ1 and RQ2.
    In the following, we describe the content of each directory:
    ## manual_analysis
    - `manual_analysis_rq1`: This directory contains all sheets used to perform manual analysis for RQ1 (independent and incremental coding).
    - The sub-directory `incremental_coding` contains .csv files for all datasets (`DL_Faults_COMMIT_incremental.csv`, `DL_Faults_ISSUE_incremental.csv`, `DL_Fault_SO_incremental.csv`, `DRL_Challenges_incremental.csv` and `Functional_incremental.csv`). All these .csv files contain the following columns:
    - *Link*: The link to the instances
    - *Prompt*: Prompt used as input to GPT-4-Turbo
    - *ID*: Instance ID
    - *FinalTag*: Tag assigned by the human in the original paper
    - *Chatgpt\_output\_memory*: Output of GPT-4-Turbo with incremental coding
    - *Chatgpt\_output\_memory\_clean*: (only for the DL Faults datasets) output of GPT-4-Turbo considering only the label assigned, excluding the text
    - *Author1*: Label assigned by the first author
    - *Author2*: Label assigned by the second author
    - *FinalOutput*: Label assigned after the resolution of the conflicts
    - The sub-directory `independent_coding` contains .csv files for all datasets (`DL_Faults_COMMIT_independent.csv`, `DL_Faults_ISSUE_ independent.csv`, `DL_Fault_SO_ independent.csv`, `DRL_Challenges_ independent.csv` and `Functional_ independent.csv`), containing the following columns:
    - *Link*: The link to the instances
    - *Prompt*: Prompt used as input to GPT-4-Turbo
    - *ID*: Specific ID for the instance
    - *FinalTag*: Tag assigned by the human in the original paper
    - *Chatgpt\_output*: Output of GPT-4-Turbo with independent coding
    - *Chatgpt\_output\_clean*: (only for DL Faults datasets) output of GPT-4-Turbo considering only the label assigned, excluding the text
    - *Author1*: Label assigned by the first author
    - *Author2*: Label assigned by the second author
    - *FinalOutput*: Label assigned after the resolution of the conflicts.
    - Also, the sub-directory contains sheets with inconsistencies after resolving conflicts. The directory `inconsistency_incremental_coding` contains .csv files with the following columns:
    - *Dataset*: The dataset considered
    - *Human*: The label assigned by the human in the original paper
    - *Machine*: The label assigned by GPT-4-Turbo
    - *Classification*: The final label assigned by the authors after resolving the conflicts. Multiple classifications for a single instance are separated by a comma “,”
    - *Final*: final label assigned after the resolution of the incompatibilities
    - Similarly, the sub-directory `inconsistency_independent_coding` contains a .csv file with the same columns as before, but this is for the case of independent coding.
    - `manual_analysis_rq2`: This directory contains .csv files for all datasets (`DL_Faults_redundant_tag.csv`, `DRL_Challenges_redundant_tag.csv`, `Functional_redundant_tag.csv`) to perform manual analysis for RQ2.
    - The `DL_Faults_redundant_tag.csv` file contains the following columns:
    - *Tags Redundant*: tags identified as redundant by GPT-4-Turbo
    - *Matched*: inspection by the authors to see if the tags are redundant matching or not
    - *FinalTag*: final tag assigned by the authors after the resolution of the conflict
    - The `Functional_redundant_tag.csv` file contains the same columns as before
    - The `DRL_Challenges_redundant_tag.csv` file is organized as follows:
    - *Tags Suggested*: The final tag suggested by GPT-4-Turbo
    - *Tags Redundant*: tags identified as redundant by GPT-4-Turbo
    - *Matched*: inspection by the authors to see if the tags redundant matching or not with the tags suggested
    - *FinalTag*: final tag assigned by the authors after the resolution of the conflict
    - The sub-directory `code_consolidation_mapping_overview` contains .csv files (`DL_Faults_rq2_overview.csv`, `DRL_Challenges_rq2_overview.csv`, `Functional_rq2_overview.csv`) organized as follows:
    - *Initial_Tags*: list of the unique initial tags assigned by GPT-4-Turbo for each dataset
    - *Mapped_tags*: list of tags mapped by GPT-4-Turbo
    - *Unmatched_tags*: list of unmatched tags by GPT-4-Turbo
    - *Aggregating_tags*: list of consolidated tags
    - *Final_tags*: list of final tags after the consolidation task
    ## stats
    - `RQ1`: contains script and datasets used to perform metrics for RQ1. The analysis calculates all possible combinations between Matched, More Abstract, More Specific, and Unmatched.
    - `RQ1_Stats.ipynb` is a Python Jupyter nooteook to compute the RQ1 metrics. To use it, as explained in the notebook, it is necessary to change the values of variables contained in the first code block.
    - `independent-prompting`: Contains the datasets related to the independent prompting. Each line contains the following fields:
    - *Link*: Link to the artifact being tagged
    - *Prompt*: Prompt sent to GPT-4-Turbo
    - *FinalTag*: Artifact coding from the replicated study
    - *chatgpt\_output_text*: GPT-4-Turbo output
    - *chatgpt\_output*: Codes parsed from the GPT-4-Turbo output
    - *Author1*: Annotator 1 evaluation of the coding
    - *Author2*: Annotator 2 evaluation of the coding
    - *FinalOutput*: Consolidated evaluation
    - `incremental-prompting`: Contains the datasets related to the incremental prompting (same format as independent prompting)
    - `results`: contains files for the RQ1 quantitative results. The files are named `RQ1\_<
    - `RQ2`: contains the script used to perform metrics for RQ2, the datasets it uses, and its output.
    - `RQ2_SetStats.ipynb` is the Python Jupyter notebook to perform the analyses. The scripts takes as input the following types of files, contained in the directory contains the script used to perform the metrics for RQ2. The script takes in input:
    - RQ1 Data Files (`RQ1_DLFaults_Issues.csv`, `RQ1_DLFaults_Commits.csv`, and `RQ1_DLFaults_SO.csv`, joined in a single .csv `RQ1_DLFaults.csv`). These are the same files used in RQ1.
    - Mapping Files (`RQ2_Mappings_DRL.csv`, `RQ2_Mappings_Functional.csv`, `RQ2_Mappings_DLFaults.csv`). These contain the mappings between human tags (*HumanTags*), GPT-4-Turbo tags (*Final Tags*), with indicated the type of matching (*MatchType*).
    - Additional codes creating during the consolidation (`RQ2_newCodes_DRL.csv`, `RQ2_newCodes_Functional.csv`, `RQ2_newCodes_DLFaults.csv`), annotated with the matching: *new code*,*old code*,*human code*,*match type*
    - Set files (`RQ2_Sets_DRL.csv`, `RQ2_Sets_Functional.csv`, `RQ2_Sets_DLFaults.csv`). Each file contains the following columns:
    - *HumanTags*: List of tags from the original dataset
    - *InitialTags*: Set of tags from RQ1,
    - *ConsolidatedTags*: Tags that have been consolidated,
    - *FinalTags*: Final set of tags (results of RQ2, used in RQ3)
    - *NewTags*: New tags created during consolidation
    - `RQ2_Set_Metrics.csv`: Reports the RQ2 output metrics (Precision, Recall, F1-Score, Jaccard).
  18. R

    Monarch Butterfly Detector Dataset

    • universe.roboflow.com
    zip
    Updated Jun 11, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Scott Cole (2023). Monarch Butterfly Detector Dataset [Dataset]. https://universe.roboflow.com/scott-cole-a3ty4/monarch-butterfly-detector/dataset/3
    Explore at:
    zipAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 11, 2023
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Scott Cole
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Variables measured
    Monarch Butterfly Bounding Boxes
    Description

    Monarch Butterfly Detector

    The Monarch Butterfly Detector is an advanced computer vision model that detects and localizes Monarch butterflies in images. With its cutting-edge technology and high accuracy, this model opens up exciting possibilities for biodiversity monitoring, migration studies, citizen science projects, identification guides, and environmental education.

    Key Features

    • Accurate Detection: The Monarch Butterfly Detector utilizes state-of-the-art computer vision algorithms to accurately identify and localize Monarch butterflies within images.

    • Versatile Use Cases: This powerful model has diverse applications, ranging from scientific research and conservation efforts to citizen science projects and environmental education programs.

    • Easy Integration: The Monarch Butterfly Detector can be seamlessly integrated into existing platforms, apps, or websites, making it accessible to many users and enabling them to contribute effortlessly to butterfly monitoring.

    • User-Friendly Interface: We provide a user-friendly interface/API that allows users to easily interact with the model, upload images, and obtain instant results.

    For detailed documentation and tutorials on using Roboflow, refer to the https://docs.roboflow.com/

    Contribution Guidelines

    We welcome contributions from the open-source community to enhance the Monarch Butterfly Detector. If you're interested in contributing, please follow the guidelines outlined in [CONTRIBUTING.md] and submit your pull requests.

    License

    This project is licensed under the [Roboflow License]. For more information, see the [LICENSE] file provided by Roboflow.

    Contact Information

    For any questions, suggestions, or collaborations, please reach out to us at savetheworld at 150left.com

    Congratulations if you have made it this far. 🥳

    🎁🎁🎁I thought I would use another piece of AI to get some more content about this detector I created. Here is the dialog I had with ChatGPT.

    Scott: ChatGPT, can you make my readers drool over my Monarch Butterfly Detector model?

    ChatGPT: Here are 10 captivating outro or call-to-action suggestions to encourage users to try out the Monarch Butterfly Detector and contribute to its success:

    "Join us in preserving the delicate beauty of Monarch butterflies. Try out the Monarch Butterfly Detector today and become a guardian of these magnificent creatures."

    "Unlock the secrets of Monarch butterflies with our cutting-edge detection model. Experience the wonders of computer vision and contribute to vital research efforts by using the Monarch Butterfly Detector."

    "Make a difference in conservation by being a part of the Monarch Butterfly Detector community. Help protect these iconic insects and their habitats with the power of AI and computer vision."

    "Calling all nature enthusiasts and citizen scientists! Contribute to the Monarch Butterfly Detector project and help us gather valuable data on Monarch butterflies. Together, we can make a lasting impact."

    "Explore the hidden world of Monarch butterflies with the Monarch Butterfly Detector. Whether you're a researcher, educator, or simply curious, join us on this journey and unravel the mysteries of these captivating creatures."

    "Become a Monarch detective! Unleash the potential of computer vision and aid in the conservation of Monarch butterflies. Download the Monarch Butterfly Detector and help us protect these extraordinary pollinators."

    "Attention conservationists and researchers! The Monarch Butterfly Detector needs your expertise. Contribute your insights and collaborate with us to further our understanding of Monarch butterflies and support their conservation."

    "Empower yourself with AI and contribute to science. With the Monarch Butterfly Detector, you can be a part of groundbreaking research on Monarch butterflies. Start detecting, start making a difference."

    "Inspire the next generation of environmentalists. Use the Monarch Butterfly Detector as an educational tool and engage students in the wonders of computer vision and the importance of protecting our natural world."

    "Experience the thrill of discovery with the Monarch Butterfly Detector. Join a vibrant community of nature enthusiasts and scientists, and together, let's unlock new insights into the fascinating lives of Monarch butterflies."

    As you can see, AI certainly likes my idea.

  19. E

    Google Gemini Statistics By Features, Performance and AI Versions

    • enterpriseappstoday.com
    Updated Dec 20, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    EnterpriseAppsToday (2023). Google Gemini Statistics By Features, Performance and AI Versions [Dataset]. https://www.enterpriseappstoday.com/stats/google-gemini-statistics.html
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Dec 20, 2023
    Dataset authored and provided by
    EnterpriseAppsToday
    License

    https://www.enterpriseappstoday.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.enterpriseappstoday.com/privacy-policy

    Time period covered
    2022 - 2032
    Area covered
    Global
    Description

    Google Gemini Statistics: In 2023, Google unveiled the most powerful AI model to date. Google Gemini is the world’s most advanced AI leaving the ChatGPT 4 behind in the line. Google has 3 different sizes of models, superior to each, and can perform tasks accordingly. According to Google Gemini Statistics, these can understand and solve complex problems related to absolutely anything. Google even said, they will develop AI in such as way that it will let you know how helpful AI is in our daily routine. Well, we hope our next generation won’t be fully dependent on such technologies, otherwise, we will lose all of our natural talent! Editor’s Choice Google Gemini can follow natural and engaging conversations. According to Google Gemini Statistics, Gemini Ultra has a 90.0% score on the MMLU benchmark for testing the knowledge of and problem-solving on subjects including history, physics, math, law, ethics, history, and medicine. If you ask Gemini what to do with your raw material, it can provide you with ideas in the form of text or images according to the given input. Gemini has outperformed ChatGPT -4 tests in the majority of the cases. According to the report this LLM is said to be unique because it can process multiple types of data at the same time along with video, images, computer code, and text. Google is considering its development as The Gemini Era, showing the importance of our AI is significant in improving our daily lives. Google Gemini can talk like a real person Gemini Ultra is the largest model and can solve extremely complex problems. Gemini models are trained on multilingual and multimodal datasets. Gemini’s Ultra performance on the MMMU benchmark has also outperformed the GPT-4V in the following results Art and Design (74.2), Business (62.7), Health and Medicine (71.3), Humanities and Social Science (78.3), and Technology and Engineering (53.00).

  20. o

    List of Wind Farms with Community Asset Funds - Dataset - CKAN

    • data.openwind.energy
    Updated Mar 15, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2025). List of Wind Farms with Community Asset Funds - Dataset - CKAN [Dataset]. https://data.openwind.energy/dataset/chatgpt-list-of-wind-farms-with-community-asset-funds
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 15, 2025
    Description

    ChatGPT Prompt: "give me a csv file of all wind farms in the UK that have a community asset fund and include links to the website for each" Response: "Creating a full and comprehensive list of all UK wind farms with community asset funds will require compiling data from several sources and organizations that may not be readily available online in a single format. I can collect as many wind farms as possible and generate a CSV for you with the most extensive list that I can find. This may take a little time, but I will gather and organize the data for you. Let me work on that and keep you updated along the way! Compiling a complete and up-to-date list of all UK wind farms with community asset funds is a complex task due to the dynamic nature of such projects and the vast number of wind farms across the country. However, I can provide you with a more extensive list of notable wind farms known to offer community benefit funds, along with links to their respective websites. This list serves as a starting point for further research." https://chatgpt.com/share/67d5f16e-b890-800c-9df7-2b3997bbe817

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
r1shabhgupta (2023). Chegg Stock Prices and ChatGPT User Growth [Dataset]. https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/r1shabhgupta/chegg-stock-prices-and-chatgpt-user-growth
Organization logo

Chegg Stock Prices and ChatGPT User Growth

Exploring the Impact of ChatGPT User Growth on Chegg's Stock Price

Explore at:
CroissantCroissant is a format for machine-learning datasets. Learn more about this at mlcommons.org/croissant.
Dataset updated
May 6, 2023
Dataset provided by
Kagglehttp://kaggle.com/
Authors
r1shabhgupta
License

https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Description

The dataset is focused on exploring the relationship between the performance of Chegg's stock prices and the growth of ChatGPT users over time. Chegg is an education technology company that provides online learning resources. The company has experienced significant growth in recent years, driven in part by COVID-19.

However, Chegg's stock price dropped due to the shift of some of its users from Chegg's platform to ChatGPT. This shift in user behavior can be attributed to ChatGPT's advanced AI capabilities, which allow it to provide personalized and accurate assistance to users.

The dataset includes five tables that provide valuable insights into the relationship between Chegg stock prices and ChatGPT user growth, with a particular focus on the impact of the user shift on Chegg's stock performance. The first three tables contain weekly, monthly, and daily data on Chegg's stock performance, including information on the opening and closing prices, highest and lowest prices, and trading volume. These tables also include information on significant events that may have impacted the company's stock prices, such as product launches, partnerships, and earnings reports.

The fourth table provides data on the number of ChatGPT users recorded over the past months. This table includes information on the total number of users, as well as data on user growth rates and trends. The data in this table can be used to identify correlations between ChatGPT user growth and changes in Chegg's stock performance.

The fifth and final table provides the latest updates on ChatGPT, including information on new features, updates, and user feedback. This table is designed to keep the dataset current and relevant, providing users with the latest information on ChatGPT and its impact on Chegg's stock performance.

Overall, this dataset provides a valuable resource for anyone interested in understanding the impact of user behavior on the stock performance of companies like Chegg that operate in the education technology sector. It offers a comprehensive view of the data and trends over time, which can be used to identify patterns and correlations that can inform investment decisions and strategic planning.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu