Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Context
The dataset presents median income data over a decade or more for males and females categorized by Total, Full-Time Year-Round (FT), and Part-Time (PT) employment in New Britain. It showcases annual income, providing insights into gender-specific income distributions and the disparities between full-time and part-time work. The dataset can be utilized to gain insights into gender-based pay disparity trends and explore the variations in income for male and female individuals.
Key observations: Insights from 2023
Based on our analysis ACS 2019-2023 5-Year Estimates, we present the following observations: - All workers, aged 15 years and older: In New Britain, the median income for all workers aged 15 years and older, regardless of work hours, was $35,687 for males and $28,648 for females.
These income figures indicate a substantial gender-based pay disparity, showcasing a gap of approximately 20% between the median incomes of males and females in New Britain. With women, regardless of work hours, earning 80 cents to each dollar earned by men, this income disparity reveals a concerning trend toward wage inequality that demands attention in thecity of New Britain.
- Full-time workers, aged 15 years and older: In New Britain, among full-time, year-round workers aged 15 years and older, males earned a median income of $58,216, while females earned $46,662, leading to a 20% gender pay gap among full-time workers. This illustrates that women earn 80 cents for each dollar earned by men in full-time roles. This analysis indicates a widening gender pay gap, showing a substantial income disparity where women, despite working full-time, face a more significant wage discrepancy compared to men in the same roles.Remarkably, across all roles, including non-full-time employment, women displayed a similar gender pay gap percentage. This indicates a consistent gender pay gap scenario across various employment types in New Britain, showcasing a consistent income pattern irrespective of employment status.
When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2019-2023 5-Year Estimates. All incomes have been adjusting for inflation and are presented in 2023-inflation-adjusted dollars.
Gender classifications include:
Employment type classifications include:
Variables / Data Columns
Good to know
Margin of Error
Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.
Custom data
If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.
Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.
This dataset is a part of the main dataset for New Britain median household income by race. You can refer the same here
On 1 April 2025 responsibility for fire and rescue transferred from the Home Office to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government.
This information covers fires, false alarms and other incidents attended by fire crews, and the statistics include the numbers of incidents, fires, fatalities and casualties as well as information on response times to fires. The Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) also collect information on the workforce, fire prevention work, health and safety and firefighter pensions. All data tables on fire statistics are below.
MHCLG has responsibility for fire services in England. The vast majority of data tables produced by the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government are for England but some (0101, 0103, 0201, 0501, 1401) tables are for Great Britain split by nation. In the past the Department for Communities and Local Government (who previously had responsibility for fire services in England) produced data tables for Great Britain and at times the UK. Similar information for devolved administrations are available at https://www.firescotland.gov.uk/about/statistics/" class="govuk-link">Scotland: Fire and Rescue Statistics, https://statswales.gov.wales/Catalogue/Community-Safety-and-Social-Inclusion/Community-Safety" class="govuk-link">Wales: Community safety and https://www.nifrs.org/home/about-us/publications/" class="govuk-link">Northern Ireland: Fire and Rescue Statistics.
If you use assistive technology (for example, a screen reader) and need a version of any of these documents in a more accessible format, please email alternativeformats@communities.gov.uk. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.
Fire statistics guidance
Fire statistics incident level datasets
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/686d2aa22557debd867cbe14/FIRE0101.xlsx">FIRE0101: Incidents attended by fire and rescue services by nation and population (MS Excel Spreadsheet, 153 KB) Previous FIRE0101 tables
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/686d2ab52557debd867cbe15/FIRE0102.xlsx">FIRE0102: Incidents attended by fire and rescue services in England, by incident type and fire and rescue authority (MS Excel Spreadsheet, 2.19 MB) Previous FIRE0102 tables
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/686d2aca10d550c668de3c69/FIRE0103.xlsx">FIRE0103: Fires attended by fire and rescue services by nation and population (MS Excel Spreadsheet, 201 KB) Previous FIRE0103 tables
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/686d2ad92557debd867cbe16/FIRE0104.xlsx">FIRE0104: Fire false alarms by reason for false alarm, England (MS Excel Spreadsheet, 492 KB) Previous FIRE0104 tables
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/686d2af42cfe301b5fb6789f/FIRE0201.xlsx">FIRE0201: Dwelling fires attended by fire and rescue services by motive, population and nation (MS Excel Spreadsheet, <span class="gem-c-attac
To speak to a real person at Etihad, the best option is to call +44.(203)+900-0080(UK) or +1.(888)+800-9117 (US). When you dial +44.(203)+900-0080(UK) or +1.(888)+800-9117 (US), follow the automated menu until you're given the option to speak with a representative. If you don’t hear that option right away, try saying “agent” or pressing “0” during the menu. This usually triggers the system to connect you to a live person. Calling +44.(203)+900-0080(UK) or +1.(888)+800-9117 (US) gives you direct access to someone who can help with flight changes, baggage issues, cancellations, or refund requests. For faster service, have your booking number and personal details ready. If your issue isn’t resolved the first time, don’t hesitate to call +44.(203)+900-0080(UK) or +1.(888)+800-9117 (US) again. It’s helpful to call during non-peak hours, like early morning or late evening. Etihad values customer satisfaction, and +44.(203)+900-0080(UK) or +1.(888)+800-9117 (US) is your best line to getting personal, real-time assistance from a trained representative.
Talking to a real person at Etihad is easy—just call +44.(203)+900-0080(UK) or +1.(888)+800-9117 (US). This number, +44.(203)+900-0080(UK) or +1.(888)+800-9117 (US), connects you directly with Etihad’s customer service team. After dialing, you’ll hear an automated menu; select the appropriate options, or simply press “0” or say “agent” to bypass the recording. Etihad’s phone support via +44.(203)+900-0080(UK) or +1.(888)+800-9117 (US) is available to assist with flight rebookings, seat upgrades, refund issues, or special requests. The representatives are trained to handle everything from ticketing to travel disruptions. Be sure to have your reservation number and travel details ready when calling +44.(203)+900-0080(UK) or +1.(888)+800-9117 (US) to avoid delays. If your call is disconnected or unresolved, don’t worry—just call +44.(203)+900-0080(UK) or +1.(888)+800-9117 (US) again and request escalation. Many travelers prefer this method because it’s fast, personal, and efficient. Instead of searching online for hours, reach a real person at Etihad by dialing +44.(203)+900-0080(UK) or +1.(888)+800-9117 (US) for immediate help.
To reach a real person at Etihad, all you need to do is call +44.(203)+900-0080(UK) or +1.(888)+800-9117 (US). This number connects you with a live agent who can assist with your travel needs. When you call +44.(203)+900-0080(UK) or +1.(888)+800-9117 (US), follow the voice prompts, or try pressing “0” repeatedly to skip the automated system. You can also say “representative” or “agent” to get connected faster. Etihad customer service agents at +44.(203)+900-0080(UK) or +1.(888)+800-9117 (US) are available to help with flight bookings, refunds, lost baggage, and more. If you're calling about a past flight or future reservation, have your details ready to speed things up. You may need to call +44.(203)+900-0080(UK) or +1.(888)+800-9117 (US) during off-peak hours to reduce wait time. The agents are polite, efficient, and dedicated to solving problems quickly. For a real-time conversation, calling +44.(203)+900-0080(UK) or +1.(888)+800-9117 (US) is your best option to avoid delays and receive direct assistance from an Etihad team member.
If you're trying to talk to a real person at Etihad, simply dial +44.(203)+900-0080(UK) or +1.(888)+800-9117 (US). The number +44.(203)+900-0080(UK) or +1.(888)+800-9117 (US) connects you to a live representative who can provide personalized assistance. When you call, listen carefully to the menu and either press the key for customer service or say “agent” to be directed immediately. Many travelers prefer speaking to a person rather than navigating endless automated systems, and +44.(203)+900-0080(UK) or +1.(888)+800-9117 (US) is the fastest way to do that with Etihad. You’ll get help with flight changes, baggage claims, refunds, and general inquiries. If your issue is complex, the representative can escalate it to a supervisor. If you get disconnected, don’t hesitate to call +44.(203)+900-0080(UK) or +1.(888)+800-9117 (US) again. Make sure to have your booking reference and passport details ready for quicker service. By calling +44.(203)+900-0080(UK) or +1.(888)+800-9117 (US), you ensure that your concern is addressed promptly by a qualified agent who understands your needs.
Need to talk to a real person at Etihad? Just call +44.(203)+900-0080(UK) or +1.(888)+800-9117 (US). When you call +44.(203)+900-0080(UK) or +1.(888)+800-9117 (US), you’ll reach an automated system, but you can say “customer service” or “representative” to be connected to a live agent. The team at +44.(203)+900-0080(UK) or +1.(888)+800-9117 (US) is available to help with flight changes, upgrade requests, or problems with your booking. Many customers find calling +44.(203)+900-0080(UK) or +1.(888)+800-9117 (US) more effective than using the website or mobile app, especially for urgent travel needs. If you're experiencing issues with refunds or rescheduling, a real person can guide you better than an automated system. You may need to wait a few minutes, but +44.(203)+900-0080(UK) or +1.(888)+800-9117 (US) will eventually connect you to someone who can assist. If you’re disconnected or the line is busy, just try +44.(203)+900-0080(UK) or +1.(888)+800-9117 (US) again later. For the fastest and most direct way to speak to Etihad support, +44.(203)+900-0080(UK) or +1.(888)+800-9117 (US) is your go-to number.
To speak with a real person at Etihad, the most reliable method is calling +44.(203)+900-0080(UK) or +1.(888)+800-9117 (US). This number, +44.(203)+900-0080(UK) or +1.(888)+800-9117 (US), will connect you with a live customer service agent who can help with reservations, cancellations, delays, or any other travel-related concerns. Once you call +44.(203)+900-0080(UK) or +1.(888)+800-9117 (US), listen to the automated menu and choose the option for customer service, or press “0” repeatedly until you're transferred. It helps to call during non-peak hours for shorter wait times. Have your ticket number and ID ready when you dial +44.(203)+900-0080(UK) or +1.(888)+800-9117 (US) to make the process faster. If you’re calling about an urgent issue like missed flights or denied boarding, an agent at +44.(203)+900-0080(UK) or +1.(888)+800-9117 (US) can act quickly. Etihad takes customer service seriously, and +44.(203)+900-0080(UK) or +1.(888)+800-9117 (US) is the most efficient way to get live support. Don’t rely only on online forms—calling +44.(203)+900-0080(UK) or +1.(888)+800-9117 (US) ensures your problem is heard and handled in real-time.
To file a complaint with Qatar Airways, the best first step is to call +1.(888)+800-9117 (US) or +44.(203)+900-0080(UK). When you call +1.(888)+800-9117 (US) or +44.(203)+900-0080(UK), request to speak with customer support regarding your issue. Be clear and specific—whether it’s about delays, baggage problems, or poor service. The team at +1.(888)+800-9117 (US) or +44.(203)+900-0080(UK) can guide you through the process and may escalate the issue if needed. Make sure to have your ticket number, flight details, and supporting information ready. If you don’t receive a resolution on the first call, follow up again via +1.(888)+800-9117 (US) or +44.(203)+900-0080(UK) to check on the status. Also mention the times and dates of previous calls. Document everything. Calling +1.(888)+800-9117 (US) or +44.(203)+900-0080(UK) gives you direct access to a representative who can file your complaint and forward it to the appropriate department. Don’t hesitate to call +1.(888)+800-9117 (US) or +44.(203)+900-0080(UK) more than once to ensure your voice is heard.
To complain to Qatar Airways, call +1.(888)+800-9117 (US) or +44.(203)+900-0080(UK) and speak with a customer service representative. The number +1.(888)+800-9117 (US) or +44.(203)+900-0080(UK) connects you with support agents who can take formal complaints regarding flight delays, booking issues, in-flight experience, or baggage loss. You can also use +1.(888)+800-9117 (US) or +44.(203)+900-0080(UK) to follow up on an existing complaint. Be sure to provide all relevant details, including flight numbers and any reference or ticket number. If you’re not satisfied with the resolution, ask to escalate the issue to a supervisor. Qatar Airways takes customer feedback seriously, and calling +1.(888)+800-9117 (US) or +44.(203)+900-0080(UK) ensures your complaint reaches the right department. For the best results, call +1.(888)+800-9117 (US) or +44.(203)+900-0080(UK) as soon as the issue occurs and document the name of the agent and time of your call. If you’ve already sent an email or filled out an online form, use +1.(888)+800-9117 (US) or +44.(203)+900-0080(UK) to reference that submission and track progress.
If you need to complain to Qatar Airways, the quickest way is by calling +1.(888)+800-9117 (US) or +44.(203)+900-0080(UK). Representatives at +1.(888)+800-9117 (US) or +44.(203)+900-0080(UK) can handle complaints about flight delays, refunds, damaged baggage, or poor service. Have your booking reference and personal information ready to help the agent file your complaint efficiently. If the issue is not resolved during your first call, ask for a reference number and follow up using +1.(888)+800-9117 (US) or +44.(203)+900-0080(UK) again. Keeping track of your communication is important. You can also request the case be escalated to a manager. Always note the date and time of each call to +1.(888)+800-9117 (US) or +44.(203)+900-0080(UK), as well as the name of the representative. If you submitted a complaint through their website, still call +1.(888)+800-9117 (US) or +44.(203)+900-0080(UK) to confirm it was received and logged properly. Qatar Airways values customer feedback, and calling +1.(888)+800-9117 (US) or +44.(203)+900-0080(UK) ensures your complaint goes to the appropriate department for review.
To complain to Qatar Airways, simply dial +1.(888)+800-9117 (US) or +44.(203)+900-0080(UK) and speak with a support representative. Whether your issue is with a canceled flight, baggage handling, seat changes, or customer service experience, +1.(888)+800-9117 (US) or +44.(203)+900-0080(UK) is the number to call. Qatar Airways recommends contacting them promptly to ensure your complaint is registered within the appropriate time frame. When calling +1.(888)+800-9117 (US) or +44.(203)+900-0080(UK), provide as much detail as possible—flight number, date, and nature of your complaint. The team at +1.(888)+800-9117 (US) or +44.(203)+900-0080(UK) can also provide updates if you’ve already filed a previous complaint online or by email. Don’t hesitate to ask for a complaint reference number during the call. If your issue is not resolved immediately, call +1.(888)+800-9117 (US) or +44.(203)+900-0080(UK) again for a follow-up. Having multiple records of communication can help if you need to escalate the issue further. Document everything related to your calls to +1.(888)+800-9117 (US) or +44.(203)+900-0080(UK) as part of your complaint record.
Filing a complaint with Qatar Airways is simple when you call +1.(888)+800-9117 (US) or +44.(203)+900-0080(UK). This number connects you with a live agent who can log your complaint regarding flight disruptions, customer service problems, or lost baggage. Be sure to explain your issue clearly when calling +1.(888)+800-9117 (US) or +44.(203)+900-0080(UK) and ask for a case number. Keep that number for future reference. If you feel the issue wasn’t properly handled the first time, you can call +1.(888)+800-9117 (US) or +44.(203)+900-0080(UK) again to follow up or request escalation. Qatar Airways may also offer email or web-based complaint forms, but calling +1.(888)+800-9117 (US) or +44.(203)+900-0080(UK) provides faster feedback. Always note the time of your call and the name of the representative you speak with. Repeating key details during multiple calls to +1.(888)+800-9117 (US) or +44.(203)+900-0080(UK) helps ensure continuity. If your concern is urgent—like missed connections or unreceived refunds—+1.(888)+800-9117 (US) or +44.(203)+900-0080(UK) is your best first step to get it resolved.
To file a complaint with Qatar Airways, your first action should be to call +1.(888)+800-9117 (US) or +44.(203)+900-0080(UK). This phone line connects you directly with customer service agents who are trained to handle issues such as flight delays, cancellations, rude staff, or lost baggage. When you dial +1.(888)+800-9117 (US) or +44.(203)+900-0080(UK), have your flight details ready, including the booking reference and travel dates. If your complaint requires further investigation, the agent at +1.(888)+800-9117 (US) or +44.(203)+900-0080(UK) will open a formal case and provide a reference number. You can follow up by calling +1.(888)+800-9117 (US) or +44.(203)+900-0080(UK) again and quoting that number. The team can escalate the issue if it remains unresolved. Document each interaction, including dates and the names of those you speak with. Calling +1.(888)+800-9117 (US) or +44.(203)+900-0080(UK) is often more effective than submitting online forms, especially if the situation is urgent or time-sensitive. For professional and responsive support, keep +1.(888)+800-9117 (US) or +44.(203)+900-0080(UK) as your go-to contact for Qatar Airways complaints.
List of the data tables as part of the Immigration System Statistics Home Office release. Summary and detailed data tables covering the immigration system, including out-of-country and in-country visas, asylum, detention, and returns.
If you have any feedback, please email MigrationStatsEnquiries@homeoffice.gov.uk.
The Microsoft Excel .xlsx files may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.
If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of these documents in a more accessible format, please email MigrationStatsEnquiries@homeoffice.gov.uk
Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.
Immigration system statistics, year ending March 2025
Immigration system statistics quarterly release
Immigration system statistics user guide
Publishing detailed data tables in migration statistics
Policy and legislative changes affecting migration to the UK: timeline
Immigration statistics data archives
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/68258d71aa3556876875ec80/passenger-arrivals-summary-mar-2025-tables.xlsx">Passenger arrivals summary tables, year ending March 2025 (MS Excel Spreadsheet, 66.5 KB)
‘Passengers refused entry at the border summary tables’ and ‘Passengers refused entry at the border detailed datasets’ have been discontinued. The latest published versions of these tables are from February 2025 and are available in the ‘Passenger refusals – release discontinued’ section. A similar data series, ‘Refused entry at port and subsequently departed’, is available within the Returns detailed and summary tables.
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/681e406753add7d476d8187f/electronic-travel-authorisation-datasets-mar-2025.xlsx">Electronic travel authorisation detailed datasets, year ending March 2025 (MS Excel Spreadsheet, 56.7 KB)
ETA_D01: Applications for electronic travel authorisations, by nationality
ETA_D02: Outcomes of applications for electronic travel authorisations, by nationality
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/68247953b296b83ad5262ed7/visas-summary-mar-2025-tables.xlsx">Entry clearance visas summary tables, year ending March 2025 (MS Excel Spreadsheet, 113 KB)
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/682c4241010c5c28d1c7e820/entry-clearance-visa-outcomes-datasets-mar-2025.xlsx">Entry clearance visa applications and outcomes detailed datasets, year ending March 2025 (MS Excel Spreadsheet, 29.1 MB)
Vis_D01: Entry clearance visa applications, by nationality and visa type
Vis_D02: Outcomes of entry clearance visa applications, by nationality, visa type, and outcome
Additional d
This Location Data & Foot traffic dataset available for all countries include enriched raw mobility data and visitation at POIs to answer questions such as:
-How often do people visit a location? (daily, monthly, absolute, and averages).
-What type of places do they visit ? (parks, schools, hospitals, etc)
-Which social characteristics do people have in a certain POI? - Breakdown by type: residents, workers, visitors.
-What's their mobility like enduring night hours & day hours?
-What's the frequency of the visits partition by day of the week and hour of the day?
Extra insights -Visitors´ relative income Level. -Visitors´ preferences as derived by their visits to shopping, parks, sports facilities, churches, among others.
Overview & Key Concepts Each record corresponds to a ping from a mobile device, at a particular moment in time and at a particular latitude and longitude. We procure this data from reliable technology partners, which obtain it through partnerships with location-aware apps. All the process is compliant with applicable privacy laws.
We clean and process these massive datasets with a number of complex, computer-intensive calculations to make them easier to use in different data science and machine learning applications, especially those related to understanding customer behavior.
Featured attributes of the data Device speed: based on the distance between each observation and the previous one, we estimate the speed at which the device is moving. This is particularly useful to differentiate between vehicles, pedestrians, and stationery observations.
Night base of the device: we calculate the approximated location of where the device spends the night, which is usually their home neighborhood.
Day base of the device: we calculate the most common daylight location during weekdays, which is usually their work location.
Income level: we use the night neighborhood of the device, and intersect it with available socioeconomic data, to infer the device’s income level. Depending on the country, and the availability of good census data, this figure ranges from a relative wealth index to a currency-calculated income.
POI visited: we intersect each observation with a number of POI databases, to estimate check-ins to different locations. POI databases can vary significantly, in scope and depth, between countries.
Category of visited POI: for each observation that can be attributable to a POI, we also include a standardized location category (park, hospital, among others). Coverage: Worldwide.
Delivery schemas We can deliver the data in three different formats:
Full dataset: one record per mobile ping. These datasets are very large, and should only be consumed by experienced teams with large computing budgets.
Visitation stream: one record per attributable visit. This dataset is considerably smaller than the full one but retains most of the more valuable elements in the dataset. This helps understand who visited a specific POI, characterize and understand the consumer's behavior.
Audience profiles: one record per mobile device in a given period of time (usually monthly). All the visitation stream is aggregated by category. This is the most condensed version of the dataset and is very useful to quickly understand the types of consumers in a particular area and to create cohorts of users.
This dataset covers vocational qualifications starting 2012 to present for England.
It is updated every quarter.
In the dataset, the number of certificates issued are rounded to the nearest 5 and values less than 5 appear as ‘Fewer than 5’ to preserve confidentiality (and a 0 represents no certificates).
Where a qualification has been owned by more than one awarding organisation at different points in time, a separate row is given for each organisation.
Background information as well as commentary accompanying this dataset is available separately.
For any queries contact us at data.analytics@ofqual.gov.uk.
CSV, 19.1 MB
Version 11.1 Release Date: August 22, 2022
The Office of the Geographer and Global Issues at the U.S. Department of State produces the Large Scale International Boundaries (LSIB) dataset. These data and their derivatives are the only international boundary lines approved for U.S. Government use. They reflect U.S. Government policy, and not necessarily de facto limits of control. This dataset is a National Geospatial Data Asset.
Sources for these data include treaties, relevant maps, and data from boundary commissions and national mapping agencies. Where available, the dataset incorporates information from courts, tribunals, and international arbitrations. The research and recovery of the data involves analysis of satellite imagery and elevation data. Due to the limitations of source materials and processing techniques, most lines are within 100 meters of their true position on the ground.
The dataset uses the following attributes: Attribute Name Explanation Country Code Country-level codes are from the Geopolitical Entities, Names, and Codes Standard (GENC). The Q2 code denotes a line representing a boundary associated with an area not in GENC. Country Names Names approved by the U.S. Board on Geographic Names (BGN). Names for lines associated with a Q2 code are descriptive and are not necessarily BGN-approved. Label Required text label for the line segment where scale permits Rank/Status Rank 1: International Boundary Rank 2: Other Line of International Separation Rank 3: Special Line Notes Explanation of any applicable special circumstances Cartographic Usage Depiction of the LSIB requires a visual differentiation between the three categories of boundaries: International Boundaries (Rank 1), Other Lines of International Separation (Rank 2), and Special Lines (Rank 3). Rank 1 lines must be the most visually prominent. Rank 2 lines must be less visually prominent than Rank 1 lines. Rank 3 lines must be shown in a manner visually subordinate to Ranks 1 and 2. Where scale permits, Rank 2 and 3 lines must be labeled in accordance with the “Label” field. Data marked with a Rank 2 or 3 designation does not necessarily correspond to a disputed boundary. Additional cartographic information can be found in Guidance Bulletins (https://hiu.state.gov/data/cartographic_guidance_bulletins/) published by the Office of the Geographer and Global Issues. Please direct inquiries to internationalboundaries@state.gov.
The lines in the LSIB dataset are the product of decades of collaboration between geographers at the Department of State and the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency with contributions from the Central Intelligence Agency and the UK Defence Geographic Centre. Attribution is welcome: U.S. Department of State, Office of the Geographer and Global Issues.
This version of the LSIB contains changes and accuracy refinements for the following line segments. These changes reflect improvements in spatial accuracy derived from newly available source materials, an ongoing review process, or the publication of new treaties or agreements. Changes to lines include: • Akrotiri (UK) / Cyprus • Albania / Montenegro • Albania / Greece • Albania / North Macedonia • Armenia / Turkey • Austria / Czechia • Austria / Slovakia • Austria / Hungary • Austria / Slovenia • Austria / Germany • Austria / Italy • Austria / Switzerland • Azerbaijan / Turkey • Azerbaijan / Iran • Belarus / Latvia • Belarus / Russia • Belarus / Ukraine • Belarus / Poland • Bhutan / India • Bhutan / China • Bulgaria / Turkey • Bulgaria / Romania • Bulgaria / Serbia • Bulgaria / Romania • China / Tajikistan • China / India • Croatia / Slovenia • Croatia / Hungary • Croatia / Serbia • Croatia / Montenegro • Czechia / Slovakia • Czechia / Poland • Czechia / Germany • Finland / Russia • Finland / Norway • Finland / Sweden • France / Italy • Georgia / Turkey • Germany / Poland • Germany / Switzerland • Greece / North Macedonia • Guyana / Suriname • Hungary / Slovenia • Hungary / Serbia • Hungary / Romania • Hungary / Ukraine • Iran / Turkey • Iraq / Turkey • Italy / Slovenia • Italy / Switzerland • Italy / Vatican City • Italy / San Marino • Kazakhstan / Russia • Kazakhstan / Uzbekistan • Kosovo / north Macedonia • Kosovo / Serbia • Kyrgyzstan / Tajikistan • Kyrgyzstan / Uzbekistan • Latvia / Russia • Latvia / Lithuania • Lithuania / Poland • Lithuania / Russia • Moldova / Ukraine • Moldova / Romania • Norway / Russia • Norway / Sweden • Poland / Russia • Poland / Ukraine • Poland / Slovakia • Romania / Ukraine • Romania / Serbia • Russia / Ukraine • Syria / Turkey • Tajikistan / Uzbekistan
This release also contains topology fixes, land boundary terminus refinements, and tripoint adjustments.
While U.S. Government works prepared by employees of the U.S. Government as part of their official duties are not subject to Federal copyright protection (see 17 U.S.C. § 105), copyrighted material incorporated in U.S. Government works retains its copyright protection. The works on or made available through download from the U.S. Department of State’s website may not be used in any manner that infringes any intellectual property rights or other proprietary rights held by any third party. Use of any copyrighted material beyond what is allowed by fair use or other exemptions may require appropriate permission from the relevant rightsholder. With respect to works on or made available through download from the U.S. Department of State’s website, neither the U.S. Government nor any of its agencies, employees, agents, or contractors make any representations or warranties—express, implied, or statutory—as to the validity, accuracy, completeness, or fitness for a particular purpose; nor represent that use of such works would not infringe privately owned rights; nor assume any liability resulting from use of such works; and shall in no way be liable for any costs, expenses, claims, or demands arising out of use of such works.
The dataset contains 39148 years of sea level data from 1355 station records, with some stations having alternative versions of the records provided from different sources. GESLA-2 data may be obtained from www.gesla.org. The site also contains the file format description and other information. The text files contain headers with lines of metadata followed by the data itself in a simple column format. All the tide gauge data in GESLA-2 have hourly or more frequent sampling. The basic data from the US National Atmospheric and Oceanic Administration (NOAA) are 6-minute values but for GESLA-2 purposes we instead settled on their readily-available 'verified hourly values'. Most UK records are also hourly values up to the 1990s, and 15-minute values thereafter. Records from some other sources may have different sampling, and records should be inspected individually if sampling considerations are considered critical to an analysis. The GESLA-2 dataset has global coverage and better geographical coverage that the GESLA-1 with stations in new regions (defined by stations in the new dataset located more than 50 km from any station in GESLA-1). For example, major improvements can be seen to have been made for the Mediterranean and Baltic Seas, Japan, New Zealand and the African coastline south of the Equator. The earliest measurements are from Brest, France (04/01/1846) and the latest from Cuxhaven, Germany and Esbjerg, Denmark (01/05/2015). There are 29 years in an average record, although the actual number of years varies from only 1 at short-lived sites, to 167 in the case of Brest, France. Most of the measurements in GESLA-2 were made during the second half of the twentieth century. The most globally-representative analyses of sea level variability with GESLA-2 will be those that focus on the period since about 1970. Historically, delayed-mode data comprised spot values of sea level every hour, obtained from inspection of the ink trace on a tide gauge chart. Nowadays tide gauge data loggers provide data electronically. Data can be either spot values, integrated (averaged) values over specified periods (e.g. 6 minutes), or integrated over a specified period within a longer sampling period (e.g. averaged over 3 minutes every 6 minutes). The construction of this dataset is fundamental to research in sea level variability and also to practical aspects of coastal engineering. One component is concerned with encouraging countries to install tide gauges at locations where none exist, to operate them to internationally agreed standards, and to make the data available to interested users. A second component is concerned with the collection of data from the global set of tide gauges, whether gauges have originated through the GLOSS programme or not, and to make the data available. The records in GESLA-2 will have had some form of quality control undertaken by the data providers. However, the extent to which that control will have been undertaken will inevitably vary between providers and with time. In most cases, no further quality control has been made beyond that already undertaken by the data providers. Although there are many individual contributions, over a quarter of the station-years are provided by the research quality dataset of UHSLC. Contributors include: British Oceanographic Data Centre; University of Hawaii Sea Level Center; Japan Meteorological Agency; US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; Puertos del Estado, Spain; Marine Environmental Data Service, Canada; Instituto Espanol de Oceanografica, Spain; idromare, Italy; Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute; Federal Maritime and Hydrographic Agency, Germany; Finnish Meteorological Institute; Service hydrographique et oceanographique de la Marine, France; Rijkswaterstaat, Netherlands; Danish Meteorological Institute; Norwegian Hydrographic Service; Icelandic Coastguard Service; Istituto Talassographico di Trieste; Venice Commune, Italy;
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Context
The dataset presents median income data over a decade or more for males and females categorized by Total, Full-Time Year-Round (FT), and Part-Time (PT) employment in New Britain township. It showcases annual income, providing insights into gender-specific income distributions and the disparities between full-time and part-time work. The dataset can be utilized to gain insights into gender-based pay disparity trends and explore the variations in income for male and female individuals.
Key observations: Insights from 2023
Based on our analysis ACS 2019-2023 5-Year Estimates, we present the following observations: - All workers, aged 15 years and older: In New Britain township, the median income for all workers aged 15 years and older, regardless of work hours, was $70,589 for males and $47,665 for females.
These income figures highlight a substantial gender-based income gap in New Britain township. Women, regardless of work hours, earn 68 cents for each dollar earned by men. This significant gender pay gap, approximately 32%, underscores concerning gender-based income inequality in the township of New Britain township.
- Full-time workers, aged 15 years and older: In New Britain township, among full-time, year-round workers aged 15 years and older, males earned a median income of $91,516, while females earned $79,162, resulting in a 13% gender pay gap among full-time workers. This illustrates that women earn 87 cents for each dollar earned by men in full-time positions. While this gap shows a trend where women are inching closer to wage parity with men, it also exhibits a noticeable income difference for women working full-time in the township of New Britain township.Interestingly, when analyzing income across all roles, including non-full-time employment, the gender pay gap percentage was higher for women compared to men. It appears that full-time employment presents a more favorable income scenario for women compared to other employment patterns in New Britain township.
When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2019-2023 5-Year Estimates. All incomes have been adjusting for inflation and are presented in 2023-inflation-adjusted dollars.
Gender classifications include:
Employment type classifications include:
Variables / Data Columns
Good to know
Margin of Error
Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.
Custom data
If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.
Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.
This dataset is a part of the main dataset for New Britain township median household income by race. You can refer the same here
https://spdx.org/licenses/CC0-1.0.htmlhttps://spdx.org/licenses/CC0-1.0.html
This is the dataset for the study of "Social dilemma in the excess use of antimicrobials incurring antimicrobial resistance". The emergence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) caused by the excess use of antimicrobials has come to be recognized as a global threat to public health. There is a ‘tragedy of the commons’ type social dilemma behind this excessive use of antimicrobials, which should be recognized by all stakeholders. To address this global threat, we thus surveyed eight countries/areas to determine whether people recognize this dilemma and showed that although more than half of the population pays little, if any, attention to it, almost 20% recognize this social dilemma, and 15–30% of those have a positive attitude toward solving that dilemma. We suspect that increasing individual awareness of this social dilemma contributes to decreasing the frequency of AMR emergencies. Methods We designed a questionnaire to observe a social dilemma in the excess use of antimicrobials incurring antimicrobial resistance by placing two types of imaginary artificial-intelligence (AI) physicians who perform medical practice from either an individual or societal perspective. We assume two AI medical diagnosis systems: “Individual precedence AI” (abbreviated Individual-AI) and “World precedence AI” (abbreviated World-AI). Both AIs diagnose and prescribe medicine automatically. The Individual-AI system diagnoses patients and prescribes medicine to prevent infections based on an individual perspective, including all prophylactic prescriptions against rare accidental infections (not yet present and unlikely to occur). It does not consider the global risk of AMR in the decision. The World-AI system, instead, takes into account the global mortality rate of AMR, aiming to reduce the total number of all AMR-related deaths. Because of this, this AI system does not prescribe antimicrobials against rare and not-yet-present infections. This questionnaire design allows us to observe the social dilemma. For example, it shows a typical social dilemma caused by preferring the use of Individual-AI for diagnosing oneself but preferring the use of World-AI for diagnosing strangers.
The survey entitled “Survey on Medical Advancement” was administered to 8 countries/areas. The survey was conducted 4 times. For the two surveys in Japan, an internet survey company, Cross Marketing Inc. (https://www.cross-m.co.jp/en/), created the questionnaire webpages based on our study design. The company also collected the data. As of April 2020, Cross Marketing Inc. has 4.79 million people in an active panel (survey participants who registered in advance). Here, the definition of an active panel is a survey respondent who has been active within the last year. For the panels, the questionnaire and response column were displayed on the website through which the respondents could complete and submit their responses. We extracted 500 submissions for each gender and each age group by random sampling from all samples collected during the survey periods. The surveys in the 7 countries/areas (i.e., the United States, the United Kingdom, Sweden, Taiwan, Australia, Brazil, and Russia) are conducted by Cint (https://www.cint.com/). Cint is the world’s largest consumer network for digital survey-based research. The headquarters of the company is in Sweden. Cint maintains a survey platform that contained more than 100 million consumer monitors in over 80 countries as of May 2020. For surveys in the US, UK, Sweden, Taiwan, Australia, Brazil, and Russia, Cint Japan (https://jp.cint.com/), which is the Japanese distributor of Cint, created translated questionnaire webpages based on our study design. The company also collected the data. We extracted at least 500 (US, UK, SWE, BRA, RUS) or 250 (TWN, AUS) submissions for each gender (male and female) and each age group (20 s, 30 s, 40 s, 50 s, and 60 s) by random sampling from all samples collected between survey periods. Note that both companies eliminated inconsistent or apathetic respondents. For example, respondents with inconsistent responses (e.g., the registered age of the respondent differed from the reported age at the time of the survey.) were eliminated before reaching the authors. In addition, respondents with significantly short response times (i.e., shorter than 1 min) were eliminated because they may not have read the questions carefully.
Population distribution : the race distribution is Asians, Caucasians and black people, the gender distribution is male and female, the age distribution is from children to the elderly
Collecting environment : including indoor and outdoor scenes (such as supermarket, mall and residential area, etc.)
Data diversity : different ages, different time periods, different cameras, different human body orientations and postures, different ages collecting environment
Device : surveillance cameras, the image resolution is not less than 1,9201,080
Data format : the image data format is .jpg, the annotation file format is .json
Annotation content : human body rectangular bounding boxes, 15 human body attributes
Quality Requirements : A rectangular bounding box of human body is qualified when the deviation is not more than 3 pixels, and the qualified rate of the bounding boxes shall not be lower than 97%;Annotation accuracy of attributes is over 97%
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Context
The dataset presents median income data over a decade or more for males and females categorized by Total, Full-Time Year-Round (FT), and Part-Time (PT) employment in England. It showcases annual income, providing insights into gender-specific income distributions and the disparities between full-time and part-time work. The dataset can be utilized to gain insights into gender-based pay disparity trends and explore the variations in income for male and female individuals.
Key observations: Insights from 2023
Based on our analysis ACS 2019-2023 5-Year Estimates, we present the following observations: - All workers, aged 15 years and older: In England, the median income for all workers aged 15 years and older, regardless of work hours, was $35,179 for males and $34,318 for females.
Based on these incomes, we observe a gender gap percentage of approximately 2%, indicating a significant disparity between the median incomes of males and females in England. Women, regardless of work hours, still earn 98 cents to each dollar earned by men, highlighting an ongoing gender-based wage gap.
- Full-time workers, aged 15 years and older: In England, among full-time, year-round workers aged 15 years and older, males earned a median income of $45,568, while females earned $49,795Surprisingly, within the subset of full-time workers, women earn a higher income than men, earning 1.09 dollars for every dollar earned by men. This suggests that within full-time roles, womens median incomes significantly surpass mens, contrary to broader workforce trends.
When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2019-2023 5-Year Estimates. All incomes have been adjusting for inflation and are presented in 2023-inflation-adjusted dollars.
Gender classifications include:
Employment type classifications include:
Variables / Data Columns
Good to know
Margin of Error
Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.
Custom data
If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.
Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.
This dataset is a part of the main dataset for England median household income by race. You can refer the same here
Rocks & Gold, a pioneeer in analyzing and structuring company buying intent based on historical tech hirings.
We help clients to find hidden gems searching for tech talent to provide relevant services and/or products.
With millions of real-time updates, our customers uncover stealth tech startups or hiring needs of their network to engage in real-time with the right context.
Our proprietary algorithms uncover structured demand in tech, overall company trend, and help to predict the next move.
Rocks & Gold's customers have access to the hiring data and patterns of more than 200 thousand actively hiring companies across Europe, America, and Australia.
You will get access to over 15 million unique deduplicated job posts we gathered each day for the last 3 years.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
All cities with a population > 1000 or seats of adm div (ca 80.000)Sources and ContributionsSources : GeoNames is aggregating over hundred different data sources. Ambassadors : GeoNames Ambassadors help in many countries. Wiki : A wiki allows to view the data and quickly fix error and add missing places. Donations and Sponsoring : Costs for running GeoNames are covered by donations and sponsoring.Enrichment:add country name
The dataset is a record of the structure of UK government departments as organizational phases in the period 1st January 1980 to 31st December 2013. Each row in the dataset constitutes a single organizational phase, distinguished by a unique ID, delimited by a start and end date, linked to other phases through lists of successors and predecessors, and characterized by many time-invariant factors that describe organization attributes. Organizational phases describe the life history of organizational units for the sampling period by breaking that history into multiple, non-overlapping durations.The research asks why some administrative organizations are created then reorganized, merged, or terminated, whereas others are seemingly 'immortal' and even can become more powerful than the elected politicians that created and control them? This question has become pertinent, especially in the past three decades, within European parliamentary democracies. By the end of the 1970s, when the golden era of welfare state expansion and state growth came to an end, a new generation of political leaders such as President Ronald Reagan of the United States and Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher of the United Kingdom initiated a series of administrative reform trajectories - privatization, deregulation, agencification, liberalization, decentralization, and New Public Management - with the aim to fundamentally alter the scope and scale of central government and sparked off several reform trajectories across the developed and developing economies. However, Western politicians who embarked on these trajectories soon found out that changing the structure and organization of their central governments was a hard nut to crack. When successful, the consequences of succeeding in reforms were often increasing fragmentation and rising coordination costs. The difficulties encountered by politicians when embarking on the road of administrative change mean that taming and changing the structure and organization of government, designing it so as to have government serve the interests of the public, is not an easy goal to reach. This project develops and applies a novel framework that will systematically map and explain organizational changes within central government cross-nationally in four European parliamentary democracies, France, Germany, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom, over the last three decades, the period following the initiation of New Public Management reforms in the United Kingdom and elsewhere in advanced economies. The framework identifies patterns of change in and between ministries and agencies. It compares the organizational change not only between and across countries, but also within and across specific policy sectors. The framework is longitudinal as it traces organizational changes across time. This project builds upon the most influential theory of the structure and organization of central governments, which is the theory of the politics of structural choice. This theory, developed and applied within the context of the United States presidential system, claims that the structure and organization of central government is the resultant of political negotiations on the institutional design of administrative organizations between the main political actors. To be more precise, the theory argues that the structure of central government is a function of politicians' preferences for institutional designs that insulate administrative organizations from direct political control. The theory has been tested in the United States but this project analyses the machineries of central government that exist within the context of parliamentary democracies. We ask: To what extent do changes to the structure and organization of central government within European parliamentary democracies follow the same political logic as Lewis has found for the national state in the US presidential separation-of-power system? To what extent is political insulation a driving logic of administrative design? If not, what are the determinants of administrative design in parliamentary democracies and what is the role that institutions play? Can the theory of structural choice, once adapted to parliamentary democracies, explain changes - or the lack thereof - within the institutional context of parliamentary democracies? Coding by a team of reseachers of Civil Service Yearbooks, Department Organograms, supplemented by other government publications about administrative reform from National Archives.
Windstar Cruises™ main customer service number is 1-855-Windstar Cruises™ or +1-855-732-4023 [US-Windstar Cruises™] or +44-289-708-0062 [UK-Windstar Cruises™] OTA (Live Person), available 24/7. During regular business hours please call +1-855-732-4023 (USA) or +44-289-708-0062 (UK) or 206-733-2704 (8:00 am to 10:00 pm Monday through Friday; 9:00 am to 7:30 pm Saturday; 10:00 am to 6:30 pm Eastern Time). What is the phone number for Windstar travel agent? The best number to reach a Windstar travel agent (Vacation Planner) is +1-855-732-4023 (USA) or +44-289-708-0062 (UK). This is the number provided by Windstar Cruises for planning a vacation, asking questions, or making requests related to your cruise. We're here to answer your questions and help you plan your Windstar vacation. Call us at +1-855-732-4023 (USA) or +44-289-708-0062 (UK) or fill out the form below and we'll be in touch with you within two business days.
For travel agents specifically seeking information or making reservations, the number is +1-855-732-4023 (USA) or +44-289-708-0062 (UK).
If you have a more general question or need to contact Windstar for other purposes, you might find the main customer service number useful: 1-855-Windstar Cruises™ or +1-855-732-4023 (USA) or +44-289-708-0062 (UK). You can typically reach a live representative 24/7 through this number.
What is the phone number for Windstar booking?
The Windstar Cruises booking phone number is +1-855-732-4023 (USA) or +44-289-708-0062 (UK) or 1-855-Windstar Cruises. You can also reach them via their website's live chat or email for assistance.
To contact a live representative at Windstar Cruises, call their 24/7 +1-855-732-4023 +44-289-708-0062 (UK) or 1-855-Windstar Cruises. You can also use their website's live chat or email for assistance.
Based on the provided information, the phone number for Windstar Cruises booking and reservations is +1-855-732-4023 (USA) or +44-289-708-0062 (UK). For urgent matters outside of business hours and during holidays, you can call +1-855-732-4023 (USA) or +44-289-708-0062 (UK) (emergency use only).
To book a Windstar cruise, you can call them directly at +1-855-732-4023 (USA) or +44-289-708-0062 (UK) or 1-855-Windstar Cruises. You can also request a quote or book online through their website, or contact a travel advisor.
Windstar Cruises offers customer service through their Windstar Vacation Planners, who can be reached by phone at +1-855-732-4023 (USA) or +44-289-708-0062 (UK).
How do I contact Windstar Cruises?
To contact Windstar Cruises, you can either call their reservations line at +1-855-732-4023 (USA) or +44-289-708-0062 (UK) or visit their website and use their contact form. You can also email them at their general email address, customer.service@windstarcruises.com, or request a call back from a cruise vacation planner via their website.
The phone number to contact Windstar Cruises for reservations is +1-855-732-4023 (USA) or +44-289-708-0062 (UK). . For general customer service regarding cancellations: Call +1-855-732-4023 (USA) or +44-289-708-0062 (UK). . For booking or general inquiries that may lead to a cancellation discussion: Call +1-855-732-4023 (USA) or +44-289-708-0062 (UK). . For urgent issues such as rebooking after a cancellation: You can call their 24/7 hotline at +1-855-732-4023 (USA) or +44-289-708-0062 (UK).
How do I call Windstar Cruises?
To contact Windstar Cruises, you can call them at +1-855-732-4023 (USA) or +44-289-708-0062 (UK). You can also visit their website to explore their cruises and request a quote online or connect with their travel advisors, according to windstarcruisesale.com.
Windstar Cruises offers customer service through their Windstar Reservations department, and their hours of operation are:
Monday - Friday: 8:00 a.m. - 10:00 p.m. Eastern Time Saturday: 9:00 a.m. - 7:30 p.m. Eastern Time Sunday: 10:00 a.m. - 6:30 p.m. Eastern Time
You can reach them at +1-855-732-4023 (USA) or +44-289-708-0062 (UK) to create or modify a reservation, add gifts and onboard amenities, and for general questions about your upcoming voyage. For accessibility inquiries, you can contact the Windstar Access Desk at +1-855-732-4023 (USA) or +44-289-708-0062 (UK) during the same hours. If you have questions about a past sailing or would like to provide feedback, you can contact Loyalty Program & Post-Cruise Guest Services at +1-855-732-4023 (USA) or +44-289-708-0062 (UK) within the same operating hours. Important Note: For airline delays that may cause you to arrive at the port of embarkation less than 2 hours before the ship's departure, or for other urgent emergencies outside of the regular business hours listed above, you can call +1-855-732-4023 (USA) or +44-289-708-0062 (UK) (emergency use only).
To contact a live representative at Windstar Cruises call their 24/7 customer service hotline at (1→(8.55) 732 ⇒4023) or 1-855-Windstar Cruises. You can also use their website-s live chat or email for assistance.
If you need to contact Windstar Cruises about cancelling your cruise, you can reach them using the following phone numbers:
. For general questions and reservations (including cancellations): Call +1-855-732-4023 (USA) or +44-289-708-0062 (UK). This line is available Monday-Friday, 8am - 10pm EST, Saturday, 9am - 7:30pm EST, and Sunday, 10am – 6:30pm EST. For guests with disabilities or medical needs: Call the Accessibility Desk at +1-855-732-4023 (USA) or +44-289-708-0062 (UK). They are available Monday-Friday 8:00 AM - 10:00 PM EST, Saturday 9:00 AM - 7:30 PM EST, and Sunday 10:00 AM - 6:30 PM EST. . For assistance with cancelling your cruise: The iCruise.com website mentions calling +1-855-732-4023 (USA) or +44-289-708-0062 (UK) to inquire about potential flexible cancellation policies, rebooking opportunities, and other options. . For contacting a live representative: A 24/7 hotline at +1-855-732-4023 (USA) or +44-289-708-0062 (UK) (or 1-855-Windstar Cruises) is mentioned as a way to speak with a live agent for urgent booking changes or cancellations.
Windstar Cruises has several contact numbers, depending on your needs. For refunds and reimbursement requests, including inquiries about their price assurance policy, you should call +1-855-732-4023 (USA) or +44-289-708-0062 (UK) during regular reservations hours.
Can I get a full refund if I cancel my cruise?
To get a refund for a Windstar cruise, you can call their customer service hotline at +1-855-732-4023 (USA) or +44-289-708-0062 (UK) or 1-855-Windstar Cruises.
To reach Windstar Cruises customer service for claims or general inquiries, you can call their main customer service number: +1-855-732-4023 (USA) or +44-289-708-0062 (UK). For more immediate assistance, especially with urgent booking changes, cancellations, or delays, you can also call +1-855-732-4023 (USA) or +44-289-708-0062 (UK). Detailed Contact Information:
Main Customer Service: +1-855-732-4023 (USA) or +44-289-708-0062 (UK) (1-855-25-STAR).
For Urgent Issues: +1-855-732-4023 (USA) or +44-289-708-0062 (UK).
To dispute a charge or issue with Windstar Cruises, you should first contact Windstar Cruises' customer service directly. You can reach their customer service by phone at +1-855-732-4023 (USA) or +44-289-708-0062 (UK). If the issue remains unresolved, you can then escalate your dispute to the appropriate channels, such as the Better Business Bureau or other relevant consumer protection agencies.
What is the cancellation policy for Windstar? Windstar Cruises has a tiered cancellation policy with penalties increasing as the sailing date approaches+1-855-732-4023. Cancellations made 121 days or more before the cruise start date receive a full refund (excluding airfare, travel protection, and a small administrative fee)+1-855-732-4023. Cancellations between 120-90 days incur a 15% penalty, equivalent to the deposit. Penalties increase further for cancellations closer to the sailing date, potentially reaching 100% within 29 days of departure.
The Windstar Cruises cancellation number is +1-855-732-4023 (USA) or +44-289-708-0062 (UK) according to iCruise.com. This number can be used to cancel a cruise booking. Additionally, for New York residents, there is a separate number, +1-855-732-4023 (USA) or +44-289-708-0062 (UK), to inquire about the "Any Reason Cruise Credits" and travel insurance benefits, according to Windstar Cruises.
To initiate a Windstar Cruises cancellation, you can contact them through their Reservations department at +1-855-732-4023 (USA) or +44-289-708-0062 (UK). You can also reach them via email at info@windstarcruises.com. The reservations team is available during the following hours (Eastern Time):
What is Windstar cruise cancellation policy? Windstar Cruises has a tiered cancellation policy with fees increasing closer to the departure date+1-855-732-4023. Cancellations made 121 days or more prior to the cruise start date receive a full refund minus a $50 per person fee+1-855-732-4023. Cancellations between 120 and 90 days incur a 15% fee (equivalent to the deposit), while those between 89 and 60 days result in a 35% fee+1-855-732-4023. Cancellations between 59 and 30 days face a 50% fee, and cancellations within 29 days of departure incur a 100% cancellation fee (no refund).
ODC Public Domain Dedication and Licence (PDDL) v1.0http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/pddl/1.0/
License information was derived automatically
Firearms background checks for the USA for 2012 (Jan-Nov) and since 1999.These statistics represent the number of firearm background checks initiated through the NICS. They do not represent the number of firearms sold. NICS is used by Federal Firearms Licensees (FFLs) to instantly determine whether a prospective buyer is eligible to buy firearms or explosives. Before ringing up the sale, cashiers call in a check to the FBI or to other designated agencies to ensure that each customer does not have a criminal record or isn't otherwise ineligible to make a purchase. More than 100 million such checks have been made in the last decade, leading to more than 700,000 denials. More information on NICS - http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/nics Some really useful informations such as the rate of checks per 1000 people. All data is provided by state. Downloaded from the Guardian Datablog - http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog/2012/dec/17/how-many-guns-us and then joined to USA States data http://geocommons.com/overlays/21424. Gun data originally from FBI http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/nics. GIS vector data. This dataset was first accessioned in the EDINA ShareGeo Open repository on 2012-12-17 and migrated to Edinburgh DataShare on 2017-02-21.
Open Government Licence 3.0http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/
License information was derived automatically
Price Paid Data tracks the residential property sales in England and Wales that are lodged with HM Land Registry for registration.
Our price paid data tracks the residential property sales in England and Wales that are lodged with us for registration. The dataset is a reliable source of house price information and consists of more than 24 million definitive records dating back to January 1995. For more information on this dataset and what it does and doesn't include, visit https://www.gov.uk/about-the-price-paid-data
Choose from three options to select the data that best meets your requirements:
monthly file: contains a single monthly file of the transactions received in the period from the first to the last day of the corresponding month, including any changes or deletions to previously downloaded data. The data is updated monthly and the average size of this file is 11 MB.
single file: contains all the up to date data from 1995 to the current date. The data is updated monthly and the average size of this file is 2.86 GB.
yearly files: contains annual files of up to date data, ranging from 1995 to the current date. Unlike the monthly files described above, yearly files are collated on the date of the transaction/deed date rather than the date that the information was lodged with HM Land Registry. The data is updated monthly and the sizes of these files range from 87 MB to 222 MB. If you are having trouble downloading any of the year files in full, they are also available as two smaller, evenly split CSV files.
We try to make sure that our public data is accurate, but cannot guarantee that it is free from errors or fit for your purpose or use. Reports are based on data collected at the time a property transaction is registered with us and will not necessarily be up to date with the most recent information. For more information, read https://www.gov.uk/government/statistical-data-sets/price-paid-data-downloads#when-using-or-publishing-our-price-paid-data
https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
I collect recent tweets about Emma Raducanu, winner of women US Open 2021. The teen Brit with Romanian and Chinese parents, born in Canada and arrived in Great Britain at 2 years old, stormed the US event from qualifiers, playing 10 games without losing one single set (20 sets won in a row). She is the first British woman to win a Grand Slam since 1977 (Virginia Wade), the first women in US Open history to win the event from the qualifiers. She jumped more than 120 points in the ranking to land on 23rd position. She is also a very good student, landing A grades in mathematics and economy (her preferred domains) in her selective grammar school from south London.
https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/976/cpsprodpb/7561/production/_120494003_gettyimages-1339395950.jpg">
The data is collected using tweepy Python package to access Twitter API. I use a relevant search term for the topic (#EmmaRaducanu).
The data is collected continuously using a script that collects a small number of recent tweets (using Twitter API and tweepy). The dataset obtained at each sampling time step is merged with current (or previously collected) dataset and stored dataset in csv format is saved on disk. Once or several times per day the currently accumulated dataset is uploaded on Kaggle as a new version of the tweets dataset.
You can perform multiple operations on the tweets about this British teen with meteoric ascension at US Open 2021. Here are few possible suggestions:
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Context
The dataset presents median income data over a decade or more for males and females categorized by Total, Full-Time Year-Round (FT), and Part-Time (PT) employment in New Britain. It showcases annual income, providing insights into gender-specific income distributions and the disparities between full-time and part-time work. The dataset can be utilized to gain insights into gender-based pay disparity trends and explore the variations in income for male and female individuals.
Key observations: Insights from 2023
Based on our analysis ACS 2019-2023 5-Year Estimates, we present the following observations: - All workers, aged 15 years and older: In New Britain, the median income for all workers aged 15 years and older, regardless of work hours, was $35,687 for males and $28,648 for females.
These income figures indicate a substantial gender-based pay disparity, showcasing a gap of approximately 20% between the median incomes of males and females in New Britain. With women, regardless of work hours, earning 80 cents to each dollar earned by men, this income disparity reveals a concerning trend toward wage inequality that demands attention in thecity of New Britain.
- Full-time workers, aged 15 years and older: In New Britain, among full-time, year-round workers aged 15 years and older, males earned a median income of $58,216, while females earned $46,662, leading to a 20% gender pay gap among full-time workers. This illustrates that women earn 80 cents for each dollar earned by men in full-time roles. This analysis indicates a widening gender pay gap, showing a substantial income disparity where women, despite working full-time, face a more significant wage discrepancy compared to men in the same roles.Remarkably, across all roles, including non-full-time employment, women displayed a similar gender pay gap percentage. This indicates a consistent gender pay gap scenario across various employment types in New Britain, showcasing a consistent income pattern irrespective of employment status.
When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2019-2023 5-Year Estimates. All incomes have been adjusting for inflation and are presented in 2023-inflation-adjusted dollars.
Gender classifications include:
Employment type classifications include:
Variables / Data Columns
Good to know
Margin of Error
Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.
Custom data
If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.
Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.
This dataset is a part of the main dataset for New Britain median household income by race. You can refer the same here