The 2015 U.S. Transgender Survey (USTS) was conducted by the National Center for Transgender Equality (NCTE) to examine the experiences of transgender adults in the United States. The USTS questionnaire was administered online and data were collected over a 34-day period in the summer of 2015, between August 19 and September 21. The final sample included respondents from all fifty states, the District of Columbia, American Samoa, Guam, Puerto Rico, and U.S. military bases overseas. The USTS Public Use Dataset (PUDS) features survey results from 27,715 respondents and details the experiences of transgender people across a wide range of areas, such as education, employment, family life, health, housing, and interactions with police and prisons. The survey instrument had thirty-two sections that covered a broad array of topics, including questions related to the following topics (in alphabetical order): accessing restrooms; airport security; civic participation; counseling; family and peer support; health and health insurance; HIV; housing and homelessness; identity documents; immigration; intimate partner violence; military service; police and incarceration; policy priorities; public accommodations; sex work; sexual assault; substance use; suicidal thoughts and behaviors; unequal treatment, harassment, and physical attack; and voting. Demographic information includes age, racial and ethnic identity, sex assigned at birth, gender and preferred pronouns, sexual orientation, language(s) spoken at home, education, employment, income, religion/spirituality, and marital status. There are no publicly available data files for this study. The naming conventions were maintained from the original pre-ICPSR release and the PUDS file is restricted use along with the qualitative data (MS Excel) file. Before applying for access to these data please refer to the Approved Requests for USTS Data. These abstracts describe work currently in progress, and we provide them to help reduce the risk of duplication of research efforts.

In 2022, around 80 percent of transgender people in the United States had considered suicide, while around 40 percent had attempted suicide. There has been an upward trend in both the considered and attempted suicide rate since 2000, when 61 percent of transgender people considered committing suicide and 28 percent had attempted it.

The TransPop study is the first national probability sample of transgender individuals in the United States (it also includes a comparative cisgender sample). A primary goal of this study was to provide researchers with a representative sample of transgender people in the United States. The study examines a variety of health-relevant domains including health outcomes and health behaviors, experiences with interpersonal and institutional discrimination, identity, transition-related experiences, and basic demographic characteristics (age, race/ethnicity, religion, political party affiliation, marital status, employment, income, location, sex, gender, and education). Co-investigators (in alphabetical order): Walter O. Bockting, Ph.D. (Columbia University); Jody L. Herman, Ph.D. (UCLA); Sari L. Reisner, Ph.D. (Harvard University and The Fenway Institute, Fenway Health).

This layer shows Household Pulse Survey data on gender identity and sexual orientation. Gender identity is the internal perception of gender, and how one identifies based on how one aligns or doesn’t align with cultural options for gender. This is a different concept than sex assigned at birth. Sexual orientation is the type of sexual attraction one has the capacity to feel for others, generally labeled based on the gender relationship between the person and the people they are attracted to. This is not the same as sexual behavior or preference.Learn more about how the Census Bureau survey measures sexual orientation and gender identity. This page includes nation-wide characteristics such as age, Hispanic origin and race, and educational attainment. Also read some of their findings about experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic, such as lesbian, gay, bisexual, or transgender (LGBT) adults experiencing higher rates of both economic hardship and mental health hardship. See the questionnaire used in phase 3.2 of the Household Pulse Survey.Source: Household Pulse Survey Data Tables. Data values in this layer are from Week 34 (July 21 - August 2, 2021), the first week that gender identity and sexual orientation questions were part of this survey. Top 15 metros are based on total population and are the same 15 metros available for all Household Pulse Data Tables.This layer is symbolized to show the percent of adults who are lesbian, gay, bisexual, or transgender (LGBT) as well as adults whose gender or sexual orientation was not listed on the survey (LGBTQIA+). The color of the symbol depicts the percentage and the size of the symbol depicts the count. *Percent calculations do not use those who did not report either their gender or sexual orientation in either the numerator or denominator, consistent with methodology used by the source.*Data Prep Steps:Data prep used Table 1 (Child Tax Credit Payment Status and Use, by Select Characteristics) to perform tabular data transformation. SAS to Table conversion tool was used to bring the tables into ArcGIS Pro.The data is joined to 2019 TIGER boundaries from the U.S. Census Bureau.Using the counties in each metro according to the Metropolitan and Micropolitan Statistical Area Reference Files, metro boundaries created via Merge and Dissolve tools in ArcGIS Pro.In preparing the field aliases and long descriptions, "none of these" and "something else" were generally modified to "not listed."

Replication instructions using STATA for forthcoming article in PS.

In a global survey conducted in 2023, ***** percent of respondents from 30 countries identified themselves as transgender, non-binary/non-conforming/gender-fluid, or in another way. In Switzerland, around *** percent of the respondents stated to identify themselves with one of the listed genders.

Snapshot img

US Sex Reassignment Surgery Market Size 2024-2028

The us sex reassignment surgery market size is valued to increase USD 137 million, at a CAGR of 10.87% from 2023 to 2028. Increase in number of people opting for sex change surgeries in US will drive the us sex reassignment surgery market.

Major Market Trends & Insights

By Type - Male to female segment was valued at USD 92.60 million in 2022
By End-user - Hospitals segment accounted for the largest market revenue share in 2022

Market Size & Forecast

Market Opportunities: USD 132.24 million
Market Future Opportunities: USD 137.00 million
CAGR from 2023 to 2028 : 10.87%

Market Summary

The Sex Reassignment Surgery Market in the US is a continually evolving landscape shaped by advancements in core technologies and applications, service types, and regulatory frameworks. According to recent studies, the number of people undergoing sex reassignment surgeries in the US has been on the rise, with an estimated 30,700 procedures performed in 2020, representing a significant increase from previous years. This trend can be attributed to the growing awareness and acceptance of transgender individuals, as well as advancements in surgical techniques and materials. However, the market faces challenges, including high costs, potential side effects, and ongoing regulatory debates. For instance, some common side effects of sex reassignment surgeries include scarring, infection, and complications related to hormone therapy. Despite these challenges, opportunities abound, particularly in the development of less invasive procedures and the expansion of insurance coverage for transgender healthcare.

What will be the Size of the US Sex Reassignment Surgery Market during the forecast period?

Get Key Insights on Market Forecast (PDF) Request Free Sample

How is the Sex Reassignment Surgery in US Market Segmented and what are the key trends of market segmentation?

The sex reassignment surgery in us industry research report provides comprehensive data (region-wise segment analysis), with forecasts and estimates in 'USD million' for the period 2024-2028, as well as historical data from 2018-2022 for the following segments. TypeMale to femaleFemale to maleEnd-userHospitalsClinicsGeographyNorth AmericaUS

By Type Insights

The male to female segment is estimated to witness significant growth during the forecast period.

The Sex Reassignment Surgery (SRS) market in the US continues to evolve, with a focus on evidence-based practices and individualized patient care. Prior to surgical interventions, patients undergo extensive evaluations, including psychological assessments and hormone replacement therapy to ensure patient selection criteria are met. Surgical procedures, such as vaginoplasty, chest reconstruction, and facial feminization surgery, employ various techniques like grafting, implant selection, and tissue expansion. These surgeries often involve complications, such as surgical complications, surgical planning, and long-term follow-up, necessitating adherence to guidelines and informed consent processes. Patients may also opt for anesthesia protocols, prosthetic fitting, and scar management. Ethical considerations, including fertility preservation and social transition support, are integral to the process. The surgical outcomes vary, with patient satisfaction metrics influenced by factors like recovery timelines, adherence to guidelines, and surgical techniques. Key statistics indicate that around 1 in 3 transgender individuals in the US undergo some form of SRS, highlighting the significance of this market.

Request Free Sample

The Male to female segment was valued at USD 92.60 million in 2018 and showed a gradual increase during the forecast period.

Request Free Sample

Market Dynamics

Our researchers analyzed the data with 2023 as the base year, along with the key drivers, trends, and challenges. A holistic analysis of drivers will help companies refine their marketing strategies to gain a competitive advantage.

The US sex reassignment surgery market encompasses a range of procedures and services aimed at helping individuals undergo gender transition. This market is characterized by a growing demand for advanced surgical techniques and comprehensive patient care. Preoperative hormonal therapy protocols play a crucial role in preparing patients for surgery, while postoperative complications management ensures optimal recovery. Facial feminization surgical techniques and genital reconstruction surgical approaches are key focus areas, with continuous advancements in tissue expansion techniques, graft selection criteria, and implant material selection driving innovation. Chest reconstruction surgical options, such as breast augmentation and top surgery, are also in high demand. Hormone replacement therapy regimens and psychological supp

Despite a multitude of social processes that enforce a binary gender system, an increasing share of Americans identify as transgender. Why do some individuals adopt gender variant identities while others do not? In this paper, I propose that alienation from normative categories, in addition to social support for trans identities, shapes gender identification. I argue that people with bodies viewed as orderly are less likely to adopt trans identities than those whose bodies are perceived as disorderly. Using data from three population-based surveys of U.S. adults, I find that people with physical disabilities are more likely than people without physical disabilities to identify as transgender, particularly in younger cohorts. I also draw from a survey of Colorado high school students to underscore that the relationship between disability and transness depends on contextual meanings of gender and disability. I conclude that gender and disability are co-constituted within social interactions.

Full text and metadata for articles used in the analyses for "Locating the Asymmetry in Information Flow between Local and National Media on Transgender Discourses", currently under review for a special issue on transphobic disinformation from the Bulletin of Applied Transgender Studies. Columns: Unnamed:0 (dataset index), media_name (media outlet where the article was published), publish_date (date of publication in YYYY-mm-DD HH:MM:SS format), title (article title), url (article URL as obtained from MediaCloud), subtitle (article subtitle), text (article text), sent_count (number of sentences), domain (domain from which the article was obtained), gender_label (does this article contain the string "gender"?), media_group (state-level or national media collection as defined in the article -- one of {'texas', 'ohio', 'illinois', 'florida', 'california', 'newyork', 'nytimes.com', 'foxnews.com'}) Abstract: Mainstream news outlets set the agenda and terms of discussion for public discourse. As transgender people experience increasingly vitriolic attacks on their fundamental rights in the U.S., understanding the dynamics governing media discussions of transgender people becomes even more salient. The interplay between news outlets with different geographical scopes—national and local—is an important aspect of media discourse circulation. Guided by inter-media agenda-setting theory, we use transfer entropy, a measure of information flow, to quantify whether, and how, transgender discourses spread across local and national media. We find that transgender discourses on a particular topic propagate from national to state-level outlets; however, we find that this process often involves two steps: national outlets influence particular state(s), which, in turn, influence the other states. Therefore, local outlets play a more complex role in agenda-setting for transgender discourses than previously thought. We combine our quantitative study of information flow between two national outlets and six state-level news collections with two comprehensive qualitative case studies, including recommendations for interventions to improve the state of the news ecosystem, to shed light on the circulation and nature of various transgender discourses across different geographical scopes within the U.S. media landscape.

Abstract: Transgender rights encompass the advocacy for equal civil and social rights for those who do not conform to traditional gender norms. This term covers a diverse range of individuals, including transsexuals, cross-dressers, and those identifying as gender non-binary. Conversely, cisgender individuals accept their biological gender identity. Over the past few decades, the political organization and visibility of transgender individuals have grown significantly. Despite variations in global estimates, recent research suggests that around 1 in 250 people in the United States identify as transgender (Meerwijk and Sevelius, 2017). Transgender rights are often framed as moral claims, entailing benefits such as the right to self-identify gender, access to necessary medical care, and protection from discrimination. This advocacy places responsibilities on governments, corporations, and individuals. While there is a risk of oversimplifying the experiences of transgender individuals by using a single term, "transgender," it remains a crucial phrase for organizing and advocating for rights. The term encompasses a political and social movement striving for equal protection of civil and social rights, expanding beyond the transgender community. Transgender rights are not confined solely to this group; they apply universally, grounded in moral principles rather than statutory protection. Despite legal progress, transgender individuals still face violence, prejudice, and marginalization, ranging from verbal abuse to extreme physical violence. Transgender women of color, in particular, encounter heightened risks in the United States and Europe. Health issues, unemployment, poverty, and suicidal thoughts are prevalent among transgender individuals.

While legal and jurisprudential aspects of transgender rights are well-documented, philosophical ethics discussions on this topic are limited. To understand the essence of transgender rights, we explore human rights organizations' efforts and moral arguments advocating for fundamental gender rights, including the freedom to choose and express one's gender identity.

Demographic characteristics of study participants, comparing transgender women and cisgender men.

Snapshot img

Gender Reassignment Surgery Market Size 2025-2029

The gender reassignment surgery market size is forecast to increase by USD 374.2 million, at a CAGR of 11.2% between 2024 and 2029.

The market is experiencing significant growth due to the increasing number of individuals opting for sex change procedures worldwide. This trend is driven by the growing acceptance and recognition of transgender and gender non-conforming individuals, leading to a surge in demand for medical solutions to help them align their physical identity with their gender identity. Advancements in medical technology have also played a crucial role in the market's expansion, enabling surgeons to perform these procedures more safely and effectively than ever before. However, the high cost of gender reassignment surgeries remains a significant challenge for many individuals seeking these procedures. Despite this obstacle, the market's potential for growth is substantial, particularly as societal attitudes towards gender identity continue to evolve and more individuals feel empowered to seek out the medical solutions they need to live authentically. Companies operating in this market can capitalize on this trend by offering affordable financing options, partnering with insurance providers, and investing in research and development to further advance surgical techniques and reduce costs.

What will be the Size of the Gender Reassignment Surgery Market during the forecast period?

Explore in-depth regional segment analysis with market size data - historical 2019-2023 and forecasts 2025-2029 - in the full report.
Request Free SampleThe market continues to evolve, driven by advancements in medical technology, growing societal acceptance, and increasing demand for comprehensive care. Surgical implants, preoperative counseling, and surgical techniques are constantly improving to enhance patient satisfaction and outcomes. Body image, a significant factor in the decision-making process, is addressed through various means, including social support groups and mental health services. Gender identity, a complex construct, is being explored through clinical trials and psychological counseling, aiming to provide more personalized and effective care. Hormone therapy, a crucial aspect of gender affirmation, is subject to ongoing research and refinement. Healthcare costs, a barrier for many, are being addressed through insurance coverage and medical tourism. Infection control, surgical risks, and pain management are essential components of quality care, with data analysis and evidence-based practices guiding best practices. Facial feminization and breast augmentation are popular procedures, but genital reconstruction and voice therapy are also gaining attention. Ethical considerations, patient advocacy, and long-term effects are crucial areas of focus. Sexual health, scar management, fertility preservation, and postoperative support are essential aspects of holistic care. Professional guidelines and post-operative care ensure consistent quality, while follow-up appointments and community resources provide ongoing support. Psychosocial assessment and informed consent forms are integral parts of the preoperative process. Medical imaging and patient education are essential for accurate diagnosis and effective treatment. The market is characterized by continuous dynamism, with ongoing unfolding of market activities and evolving patterns. Adverse events, healthcare access, and patient advocacy are ongoing concerns, requiring constant attention and innovation. The ultimate goal is to improve patient outcomes, enhance quality of life, and ensure ethical and compassionate care.

How is this Gender Reassignment Surgery Industry segmented?

The gender reassignment surgery industry research report provides comprehensive data (region-wise segment analysis), with forecasts and estimates in 'USD million' for the period 2025-2029, as well as historical data from 2019-2023 for the following segments. TypeMale to femaleFemale to maleEnd-userHospitalsSpecialty ClinicsAmbulatory Surgical Centers (ASCs)Distribution ChannelPublic healthcare systemsPrivate healthcare providersTechnologyMinimally invasive techniquesRobotic-assisted surgeryTraditional open surgeryPatient DemographicsAgeSocioeconomic statusGeographyNorth AmericaUSCanadaEuropeGermanySpainUKAPACIndiaMalaysiaThailandSouth AmericaArgentinaBrazilRest of World (ROW)

By Type Insights

The male to female segment is estimated to witness significant growth during the forecast period.The market encompasses various procedures aimed at helping individuals with gender dysphoria transition into their identified gender. This process often includes hormone therapy and psychological counseling to ensure readiness and understanding of the implications. Hormone therapy, while not mandatory, helps patients align their physical appearance with their gender identity. Surgeries such as vagi

This catalog record includes detailed variable-level descriptions, enabling data discovery and comparison. The data are not archived at ICPSR. Users should consult the data owners (via the Roper Center for Public Opinion Research) directly for details on obtaining the data. This collection includes variable-level metadata of the 2017 Discrimination in the United States Survey, a survey from Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health/Robert Wood Johnson Foundation/National Public Radio conducted by Social Science Research Solutions (SSRS). Topics covered in this survey include:Belief in discrimination against racial/ethnic minoritiesDiscrimination against men/womenDiscrimination against lesbian/gay/bisexual peopleDiscrimination against transgender peopleBiggest problem with discrimination against lesbian/gay/bisexual/transgender/queer (LGBTQ) peopleLive on tribal landsLocal/tribal government Discrimination based on raceDiscrimination based on genderDiscrimination based on being part of the LGBTQ communityReasons for avoiding seeking health careExperiences with discriminationDiscrimination resulting in fewer employment opportunitiesDiscrimination resulting in unequal payDiscrimination resulting in fewer chances for quality educationEncouraged to/discouraged from applying to collegePredominant groups living in respondent's areaNot feeling/being welcomed in neighborhood due to raceNot feeling/being welcomed in neighborhood due to being part of LGBTQ communityConsidered moving to another area because of discriminationComparing respondent's area to othersPolice using unnecessary force based on race/ethnicityAvoiding activities to avoid discrimination from policeExperiences caused by racial discriminationExperiences caused by gender discriminationExperiences caused by discrimination against LGBTQ communityLocal police force does/does not reflect racial/ethnic background of communityContacted by political representatives about voting/supporting causeRegistered to voteVote in 2016 presidential electionPhysical health statusMental health statusDisabilityChronic illnessVeterans AdministrationIndian Health ServicesSeeking health careInsurance coverageThe data and documentation files for this survey are available through the Roper Center for Public Opinion Research [Roper #31114655]. Frequencies and summary statistics for the 235 variables from this survey are available through the ICPSR social science variable database and can be accessed from the Variables tab.

This dataset contains surveillance study estimates for population size, HIV prevalence, and ART coverage among female sex workers (FSW), men who have sex with men (MSM), people who inject drugs (PWID), and transgender men and women (TGM/W) from 2010-2023. It was created to support the UNAIDS Estimates Key Population Workbook for use by HIV estimates teams in sub-Saharan Africa. Key population surveillance reports, including Ministry of Health-led biobehavioural surveys, mapping studies, and academic studies were used to populate the database.

The dataset was populated using existing key population size estimate databases including:

• UNAIDS Key Population Atlas
• US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention surveillance database
• Global Fund against HIV/AIDS, TB, and Malaria surveillance database
• Global.HIV database
• Systematic review databases among MSM (Stannah et al, 2019 and Stannah et al., 2023) and PWID (Degenhardt et al., 2023)

and was additionally supplemented by a literature review of peer-reviewed and grey literature sources.

HIV prevalence and odds ratios for trans feminine individuals compared to all adults (age 15+) in US-based studies, according to whether data was collected before or after the introduction of PrEP (2012).

Participating studies, enrolled populations, study site, number of transgender women study participants.

HIV risk behaviors during reference period1, comparing transgender women and cisgender men.

Mapping LGBTQ Equality: 2010 to 2020 presented the status of LGBTQ equality at the U.S. state level by examining a policy tally by the Movement Advancement Project (MAP), and encompassed nearly 40 LGBTQ-related laws and policies across all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the five U.S. territories as of January 1, 2020. The report also compared the January 1, 2020 status of LGBTQ policy landscape to the status of those same laws as of January 1, 2010. MAP's policy tally aggregated these laws and policies to gauge the LGBTQ-related policy landscape across the country. What emerged in 2020 was a patchwork of positive LGBTQ laws and policies, with variations both by region and area of law, as well as growth in both the policy accomplishments and challenges facing LGBTQ people over the decade of observation. Areas of law and policy included: relationship and parental recognition, nondiscrimination, religious exemptions, LGBTQ youth-related laws, health care, criminal justice, and identity documents.

Substance use during reference period1, comparing transgender women and cisgender men.

HIV care continuum outcomes during reference period1, comparing transgender women and cisgender men.