Home Ownership Rate in the United States decreased to 65.10 percent in the first quarter of 2025 from 65.70 percent in the fourth quarter of 2024. This dataset provides the latest reported value for - United States Home Ownership Rate - plus previous releases, historical high and low, short-term forecast and long-term prediction, economic calendar, survey consensus and news.

Graph and download economic data for Homeownership Rate in the United States (RHORUSQ156N) from Q1 1965 to Q2 2025 about homeownership, housing, rate, and USA.

Although the American Community Survey (ACS) produces population, demographic and housing unit estimates, the decennial census is the official source of population totals for April 1st of each decennial year. In between censuses, the Census Bureau's Population Estimates Program produces and disseminates the official estimates of the population for the nation, states, counties, cities, and towns and estimates of housing units and the group quarters population for states and counties..Information about the American Community Survey (ACS) can be found on the ACS website. Supporting documentation including code lists, subject definitions, data accuracy, and statistical testing, and a full list of ACS tables and table shells (without estimates) can be found on the Technical Documentation section of the ACS website.Sample size and data quality measures (including coverage rates, allocation rates, and response rates) can be found on the American Community Survey website in the Methodology section..Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2023 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates.ACS data generally reflect the geographic boundaries of legal and statistical areas as of January 1 of the estimate year. For more information, see Geography Boundaries by Year..Data are based on a sample and are subject to sampling variability. The degree of uncertainty for an estimate arising from sampling variability is represented through the use of a margin of error. The value shown here is the 90 percent margin of error. The margin of error can be interpreted roughly as providing a 90 percent probability that the interval defined by the estimate minus the margin of error and the estimate plus the margin of error (the lower and upper confidence bounds) contains the true value. In addition to sampling variability, the ACS estimates are subject to nonsampling error (for a discussion of nonsampling variability, see ACS Technical Documentation). The effect of nonsampling error is not represented in these tables..Users must consider potential differences in geographic boundaries, questionnaire content or coding, or other methodological issues when comparing ACS data from different years. Statistically significant differences shown in ACS Comparison Profiles, or in data users' own analysis, may be the result of these differences and thus might not necessarily reflect changes to the social, economic, housing, or demographic characteristics being compared. For more information, see Comparing ACS Data..Estimates of urban and rural populations, housing units, and characteristics reflect boundaries of urban areas defined based on 2020 Census data. As a result, data for urban and rural areas from the ACS do not necessarily reflect the results of ongoing urbanization..Explanation of Symbols:- The estimate could not be computed because there were an insufficient number of sample observations. For a ratio of medians estimate, one or both of the median estimates falls in the lowest interval or highest interval of an open-ended distribution. For a 5-year median estimate, the margin of error associated with a median was larger than the median itself.N The estimate or margin of error cannot be displayed because there were an insufficient number of sample cases in the selected geographic area. (X) The estimate or margin of error is not applicable or not available.median- The median falls in the lowest interval of an open-ended distribution (for example "2,500-")median+ The median falls in the highest interval of an open-ended distribution (for example "250,000+").** The margin of error could not be computed because there were an insufficient number of sample observations.*** The margin of error could not be computed because the median falls in the lowest interval or highest interval of an open-ended distribution.***** A margin of error is not appropriate because the corresponding estimate is controlled to an independent population or housing estimate. Effectively, the corresponding estimate has no sampling error and the margin of error may be treated as zero.

Home Ownership Rate in the United Kingdom decreased to 64.50 percent in 2023 from 64.70 percent in 2022. This dataset provides the latest reported value for - United Kingdom Home Ownership Rate - plus previous releases, historical high and low, short-term forecast and long-term prediction, economic calendar, survey consensus and news.

This service denotes the service areas for HUD's Homeownership Centers (HOCs) which help insure single family Federal Housing Administration (FHA) mortgages, and oversee the selling of HUD homes.Processing for much of the Single Family FHA mortgages is centralized into one of four Homeownership Centers (HOC) located in Atlanta, Philadelphia, Denver, and Santa Ana; each supporting specific geographic region. Although most questions are handled by the FHA Resource Center (not the HOC) for immediate acknowledgement and tracking, certain case specific issues will subsequently be referred to the appropriate center.For information about the home buying process, FHA mortgage insurance, or technical support for industry professionals, please contact the FHA Resource Center (not the HOC), by email at answers@hud.gov or call (800) CALL FHA (225-5342), for questions about the spatial attribution of this dataset, please reach out to us at GISHelpdesk@hud.gov. To learn more about Homeownership Centers (HOC) visit: https://www.hud.gov/program_offices/housing/sfh/sfhhocs

Knowing who your consumers are is essential for businesses, marketers, and researchers. This detailed demographic file offers an in-depth look at American consumers, packed with insights about personal details, household information, financial status, and lifestyle choices. Let's take a closer look at the data:

Personal Identifiers and Basic Demographics At the heart of this dataset are the key details that make up a consumer profile:

Unique IDs (PID, HHID) for individuals and households Full names (First, Middle, Last) and suffixes Gender and age Date of birth Complete location details (address, city, state, ZIP) These identifiers are critical for accurate marketing and form the base for deeper analysis.

Geospatial Intelligence This file goes beyond just listing addresses by including rich geospatial data like:

Latitude and longitude Census tract and block details Codes for Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSA) and Core-Based Statistical Areas (CBSA) County size codes Geocoding accuracy This allows for precise geographic segmentation and localized marketing.

Housing and Property Data The dataset covers a lot of ground when it comes to housing, providing valuable insights for real estate professionals, lenders, and home service providers:

Homeownership status Dwelling type (single-family, multi-family, etc.) Property values (market, assessed, and appraised) Year built and square footage Room count, amenities like fireplaces or pools, and building quality This data is crucial for targeting homeowners with products and services like refinancing or home improvement offers.

Wealth and Financial Data For a deeper dive into consumer wealth, the file includes:

Estimated household income Wealth scores Credit card usage Mortgage info (loan amounts, rates, terms) Home equity estimates and investment property ownership These indicators are invaluable for financial services, luxury brands, and fundraising organizations looking to reach affluent individuals.

Lifestyle and Interests One of the most useful features of the dataset is its extensive lifestyle segmentation:

Hobbies and interests (e.g., gardening, travel, sports) Book preferences, magazine subscriptions Outdoor activities (camping, fishing, hunting) Pet ownership, tech usage, political views, and religious affiliations This data is perfect for crafting personalized marketing campaigns and developing products that align with specific consumer preferences.

Consumer Behavior and Purchase Habits The file also sheds light on how consumers behave and shop:

Online and catalog shopping preferences Gift-giving tendencies, presence of children, vehicle ownership Media consumption (TV, radio, internet) Retailers and e-commerce businesses will find this behavioral data especially useful for tailoring their outreach.

Demographic Clusters and Segmentation Pre-built segments like:

Household, neighborhood, family, and digital clusters Generational and lifestage groups make it easier to quickly target specific demographics, streamlining the process for market analysis and campaign planning.

Ethnicity and Language Preferences In today's multicultural market, knowing your audience's cultural background is key. The file includes:

Ethnicity codes and language preferences Flags for Hispanic/Spanish-speaking households This helps ensure culturally relevant and sensitive communication.

Education and Occupation Data The dataset also tracks education and career info:

Education level and occupation codes Home-based business indicators This data is essential for B2B marketers, recruitment agencies, and education-focused campaigns.

Digital and Social Media Habits With everyone online, digital behavior insights are a must:

Internet, TV, radio, and magazine usage Social media platform engagement (Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn) Streaming subscriptions (Netflix, Hulu) This data helps marketers, app developers, and social media managers connect with their audience in the digital space.

Political and Charitable Tendencies For political campaigns or non-profits, this dataset offers:

Political affiliations and outlook Charitable donation history Volunteer activities These insights are perfect for cause-related marketing and targeted political outreach.

Neighborhood Characteristics By incorporating census data, the file provides a bigger picture of the consumer's environment:

Population density, racial composition, and age distribution Housing occupancy and ownership rates This offers important context for understanding the demographic landscape.

Predictive Consumer Indexes The dataset includes forward-looking indicators in categories like:

Fashion, automotive, and beauty products Health, home decor, pet products, sports, and travel These predictive insights help businesses anticipate consumer trends and needs.

Contact Information Finally, the file includes ke...

Version 2: I added a CSV with the state rows stripped out and added to each county so counties can be disambiguated. The code for this operation is included.

"This new report is the culmination of an investigation the Senate Budget Committee launched last fall. Over the course of the probe, the Committee obtained national county-level non-renewal data from nearly two dozen companies that collectively account for about 65 percent of the national homeowners’ insurance market. The data cover 249 million total insurance policies over the six-year period beginning in 2018 and ending in 2023. While sky-rocketing insurance premiums have been well documented, comprehensive non-renewal data of this scope and magnitude has never been publicly available—until now."

From the report: "The Committee ultimately obtained national, county-level non-renewal data from 23 of the 41 companies from which it requested this data. The data cover the years 2018 through 2023, and the companies responding collectively account for approximately 65 percent of the homeowners’ insurance market nationwide. The data released with this Report demonstrate climate change beginning to upend insurance markets around the country."

I am uploading this data here in February 2025 out of an abundance of caution given that climate change related data is currently being scrubbed from U.S. federal websites. In addition, I created a CSV of the data that is in a more usable format, in my opinion. The CSV adds a column for the year instead of separating data on different worksheet tabs, making longitudinal analysis more difficult.

Note that the formatting of the data is still terrible. County data is duplicated in state totals. "AK" is not a U.S. county, it is the state of Alaska, and it is the sum of the next several rows, which are for its counties. If you sum a column, you receive double the "grand total" listed at the bottom due to this duplication. Without states to disambiguoate, counties/districts are not uniquely identified and there are many duplicate county names. One should be able to move states/territories out and use them to disambiguate counties.

To the best of my knowledge, this dataset is in the public domain, as are most U.S. federal government publications.

Processing for much of the Single Family FHA mortgages is centralized into one of four Homeownership Centers (HOC) located in Atlanta, Philadelphia, Denver, and Santa Ana; each supporting specific geographic region. Although most questions are handled by the FHA Resource Center (not the HOC) for immediate acknowledgement and tracking, certain case specific issues will subsequently be referred to the appropriate center.

To learn more about Homeownership Centers (HOC) visit: https://www.hud.gov/program_offices/housing/sfh/sfhhocs, for questions about the spatial attribution of this dataset, please reach out to us at GISHelpdesk@hud.gov.

Nothing is more personal than home. In order to form a meaningful connection with a relevant audience, real estate and home services brands turn to data to fuel a wide variety of strategies.

TRAK's US Real Estate dataset includes enough rich home and real estate focused variables to power highly customizable analytics and direct marketing strategies. Our data is deep and wide, covering everything from financing information to the number of rooms in a home.

There are also the table stakes variables useful for a variety of industries like new movers, homeowners vs. renters, and in-market for a home purchase (premovers).

We work closely with marketers and data teams to recommend an ideal volume and depth of attributes to empower them to crush their goals. Whether it's limiting the geographic area to your market territories, or removing variables that won't have an impact on your business, we right size the data for your organization's needs. At a high level, key categories in our data set includes:

✔ Home Financing Details ✔ Home Ownership vs Renters ✔ In-Market for a Home ✔ Property Type ✔ Home Attributes ✔ Real Estate Investing ✔ New Mover

Comprehensive dataset of 21 Homeowners' associations in Wisconsin, United States as of July, 2025. Includes verified contact information (email, phone), geocoded addresses, customer ratings, reviews, business categories, and operational details. Perfect for market research, lead generation, competitive analysis, and business intelligence. Download a complimentary sample to evaluate data quality and completeness.

Dataset is a Microsoft Word file that contains the transcripts of five focus groups of adopters and prospective adopters of innovative/alternative septic systems. Focus group participants were asked a series of questions to better understand why they would or would not choose to adopt the alternative and innovative septic systems. This dataset is not publicly accessible because: EPA cannot release personally identifiable information regarding living individuals, according to the Privacy Act and the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). This dataset contains information about human research subjects. Because there is potential to identify individual participants and disclose personal information, either alone or in combination with other datasets, individual level data are not appropriate to post for public access. Restricted access may be granted to authorized persons by contacting the party listed. It can be accessed through the following means: Contact Kate Mulvaney, mulvaney.kate@epa.gov. Format: This is EPA-owned data, but SDMP was generated post clearance due to pre-RAPID/SciHub integration.

Dataset is a Microsoft Word file that contains the transcripts of five focus groups of adopters and prospective adopters of innovative/alternative septic systems. Focus group participants were asked a series of questions to better understand why they would or would not choose to adopt the alternative and innovative septic systems.

This dataset is associated with the following publication: Rudman, A., K. Mulvaney, N. Merrill, and K. Canfield. Factors in homeowners’ willingness to adopt nitrogen-reducing innovative/alternative septic systems. Frontiers in Marine Science. Frontiers, Lausanne, SWITZERLAND, 10: 1069599, (2023).

This layer shows tenure (owner or renter) by race of householder. This is shown by tract, county, and state boundaries. This service is updated annually to contain the most currently released American Community Survey (ACS) 5-year data, and contains estimates and margins of error. There are also additional calculated attributes related to this topic, which can be mapped or used within analysis. This layer is symbolized by the overall homeownership rate. To see the full list of attributes available in this service, go to the "Data" tab, and choose "Fields" at the top right. Current Vintage: 2019-2023ACS Table(s): B25003, B25003B, B25003C, B25003D, B25003E, B25003F, B25003G, B25003H, B25003IData downloaded from: Census Bureau's API for American Community Survey Date of API call: December 12, 2024National Figures: data.census.govThe United States Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS):About the SurveyGeography & ACSTechnical DocumentationNews & UpdatesThis ready-to-use layer can be used within ArcGIS Pro, ArcGIS Online, its configurable apps, dashboards, Story Maps, custom apps, and mobile apps. Data can also be exported for offline workflows. For more information about ACS layers, visit the FAQ. Please cite the Census and ACS when using this data.Data Note from the Census:Data are based on a sample and are subject to sampling variability. The degree of uncertainty for an estimate arising from sampling variability is represented through the use of a margin of error. The value shown here is the 90 percent margin of error. The margin of error can be interpreted as providing a 90 percent probability that the interval defined by the estimate minus the margin of error and the estimate plus the margin of error (the lower and upper confidence bounds) contains the true value. In addition to sampling variability, the ACS estimates are subject to nonsampling error (for a discussion of nonsampling variability, see Accuracy of the Data). The effect of nonsampling error is not represented in these tables.Data Processing Notes:This layer is updated automatically when the most current vintage of ACS data is released each year, usually in December. The layer always contains the latest available ACS 5-year estimates. It is updated annually within days of the Census Bureau's release schedule. Click here to learn more about ACS data releases.Boundaries come from the US Census TIGER geodatabases, specifically, the National Sub-State Geography Database (named tlgdb_(year)_a_us_substategeo.gdb). Boundaries are updated at the same time as the data updates (annually), and the boundary vintage appropriately matches the data vintage as specified by the Census. These are Census boundaries with water and/or coastlines erased for cartographic and mapping purposes. For census tracts, the water cutouts are derived from a subset of the 2020 Areal Hydrography boundaries offered by TIGER. Water bodies and rivers which are 50 million square meters or larger (mid to large sized water bodies) are erased from the tract level boundaries, as well as additional important features. For state and county boundaries, the water and coastlines are derived from the coastlines of the 2023 500k TIGER Cartographic Boundary Shapefiles. These are erased to more accurately portray the coastlines and Great Lakes. The original AWATER and ALAND fields are still available as attributes within the data table (units are square meters).The States layer contains 52 records - all US states, Washington D.C., and Puerto RicoCensus tracts with no population that occur in areas of water, such as oceans, are removed from this data service (Census Tracts beginning with 99).Percentages and derived counts, and associated margins of error, are calculated values (that can be identified by the "_calc_" stub in the field name), and abide by the specifications defined by the American Community Survey.Field alias names were created based on the Table Shells file available from the American Community Survey Summary File Documentation page.Negative values (e.g., -4444...) have been set to null, with the exception of -5555... which has been set to zero. These negative values exist in the raw API data to indicate the following situations:The margin of error column indicates that either no sample observations or too few sample observations were available to compute a standard error and thus the margin of error. A statistical test is not appropriate.Either no sample observations or too few sample observations were available to compute an estimate, or a ratio of medians cannot be calculated because one or both of the median estimates falls in the lowest interval or upper interval of an open-ended distribution.The median falls in the lowest interval of an open-ended distribution, or in the upper interval of an open-ended distribution. A statistical test is not appropriate.The estimate is controlled. A statistical test for sampling variability is not appropriate.The data for this geographic area cannot be displayed because the number of sample cases is too small.

ArcGIS Pro and R were used for analyses.

description: The 2006-2010 ACS 5-Year Selected Population Tables (SPT) use ACS data aggregated over a 5-year period to provide more reliable estimates of detailed social, economic, and housing characteristics for many race, tribal, Hispanic, and ancestry population groups at multiple levels of geography. Detailed tables on topics such as educational attainment, fertility, nativity, citizenship, income, poverty, and homeownership are iterated for many racial and ethnic population groups. For the SPT, detailed tables are presented for up to 392 population groups in geographies down to the tract level where population thresholds were met.; abstract: The 2006-2010 ACS 5-Year Selected Population Tables (SPT) use ACS data aggregated over a 5-year period to provide more reliable estimates of detailed social, economic, and housing characteristics for many race, tribal, Hispanic, and ancestry population groups at multiple levels of geography. Detailed tables on topics such as educational attainment, fertility, nativity, citizenship, income, poverty, and homeownership are iterated for many racial and ethnic population groups. For the SPT, detailed tables are presented for up to 392 population groups in geographies down to the tract level where population thresholds were met.

Retrofitting is an essential element of any comprehensive strategy for improving residential energy efficiency. The residential retrofit market is still developing, and program managers must develop innovative strategies to increase uptake and promote economies of scale. Residential retrofitting remains a challenging proposition to sell to homeowners, because awareness levels are low and financial incentives are lacking. The U.S. Department of Energy's Building America research team, Alliance for Residential Building Innovation (ARBI), implemented a project to increase residential retrofits in Davis, California. The project used a neighborhood-focused strategy for implementation and a low-cost retrofit program that focused on upgraded attic insulation and duct sealing. ARBI worked with a community partner, the not-for-profit Cool Davis Initiative, as well as selected area contractors to implement a strategy that sought to capitalize on the strong local expertise of partners and the unique aspects of the Davis, California, community. Working with community partners also allowed ARBI to collect and analyze data about effective messaging tactics for community-based retrofit programs. ARBI expected this project, called Retrofit Your Attic, to achieve higher uptake than other retrofit projects, because it emphasized a low-cost, one-measure retrofit program. However, this was not the case. The program used a strategy that focused on attics-including air sealing, duct sealing, and attic insulation-as a low-cost entry for homeowners to complete home retrofits. The price was kept below $4,000 after incentives; both contractors in the program offered the same price. The program completed only five retrofits. Interestingly, none of those homeowners used the one-measure strategy. All five homeowners were concerned about cost, comfort, and energy savings and included additional measures in their retrofits. The low-cost, one-measure strategy did not increase the uptake among homeowners, even in a well-educated, affluent community such as Davis. This project has two primary components. One is to complete attic retrofits on a community scale in the hot-dry climate on Davis, CA. Sufficient data will be collected on these projects to include them in the BAFDR. Additionally, ARBI is working with contractors to obtain building and utility data from a large set of retrofit projects in CA (hot-dry). These projects are to be uploaded into the BAFDR.

There is a newer and more authoritative version of this layer here! It is owned by the University of Richmond's Digital Scholarship Lab and contains data on many more cities.The Home Owners' Loan Corporation (HOLC) was created in the New Deal Era and trained many home appraisers in the 1930s. The HOLC created a neighborhood ranking system infamously known today as redlining. Local real estate developers and appraisers in over 200 cities assigned grades to residential neighborhoods. These maps and neighborhood ratings set the rules for decades of real estate practices. The grades ranged from A to D. A was traditionally colored in green, B was traditionally colored in blue, C was traditionally colored in yellow, and D was traditionally colored in red. A (Best): Always upper- or upper-middle-class White neighborhoods that HOLC defined as posing minimal risk for banks and other mortgage lenders, as they were "ethnically homogeneous" and had room to be further developed.B (Still Desirable): Generally nearly or completely White, U.S. -born neighborhoods that HOLC defined as "still desirable" and sound investments for mortgage lenders.C (Declining): Areas where the residents were often working-class and/or first or second generation immigrants from Europe. These areas often lacked utilities and were characterized by older building stock.D (Hazardous): Areas here often received this grade because they were "infiltrated" with "undesirable populations" such as Jewish, Asian, Mexican, and Black families. These areas were more likely to be close to industrial areas and to have older housing.Banks received federal backing to lend money for mortgages based on these grades. Many banks simply refused to lend to areas with the lowest grade, making it impossible for people in many areas to become homeowners. While this type of neighborhood classification is no longer legal thanks to the Fair Housing Act of 1968 (which was passed in large part due to the activism and work of the NAACP and other groups), the effects of disinvestment due to redlining are still observable today. For example, the health and wealth of neighborhoods in Chicago today can be traced back to redlining (Chicago Tribune). In addition to formerly redlined neighborhoods having fewer resources such as quality schools, access to fresh foods, and health care facilities, new research from the Science Museum of Virginia finds a link between urban heat islands and redlining (Hoffman, et al., 2020). This layer comes out of that work, specifically from University of Richmond's Digital Scholarship Lab. More information on sources and digitization process can be found on the Data and Download and About pages. This layer includes 7,148 neighborhoods spanning 143 cities across the continental United States. NOTE: As mentioned above, over 200 cities were redlined and therefore this is not a complete dataset of every city that experienced redlining by the HOLC in the 1930s. More cities are available in this feature layer from University of Richmond.Cities included in this layerAlabama: Birmingham, Mobile, MontgomeryCalifornia: Fresno, Los Angeles, Sacramento, San Diego, San Francisco, San Jose, StocktonColorado: DenverConnecticut: East Hartford, New Britain, New Haven, StamfordFlorida: Jacksonville, Miami, St. Petersburg, TampaGeorgia: Atlanta, Augusta, Chattanooga, Columbus, MaconIllinois: Aurora, Chicago, Decatur, Joliet, GaryIndiana: Evansville, Fort Wayne, Indianapolis, Gary, Muncie, South Bend, Terre HauteKansas: Greater Kansas City, WichitaKentucky: Lexington, LouisvilleLouisiana: New OrleansMassachusetts: Arlington, Belmont, Boston, Braintree, Brockton, Brookline, Cambridge, Chelsea, Dedham, Everett, Haverhill, Holyoke Chicopee, Lexington, Malden, Medford, Melrose, Milton, Needham, Newton, Quincy, Revere, Saugus, Somerville, Waltham, Watertown, Winchester, WinthropMaryland: BaltimoreMichigan: Battle Creek, Bay City, Detroit, Flint, Grand Rapids, Kalamazoo, Muskegon, Pontiac, Saginaw, ToledoMinnesota: Duluth, MinneapolisMissouri: Greater Kansas City, Springfield, St. Joseph, St. LouisNorth Carolina: Asheville, Charlotte, Durham, Greensboro, Winston SalemNew Hampshire: ManchesterNew Jersey: Atlantic City, Bergen Co., Camden, Essex County, Hudson County, TrentonNew York: Bronx, Brooklyn, Buffalo, Elmira, Binghamton/Johnson City, Lower Westchester Co., Manhattan, Niagara Falls, Poughkeepsie, Queens, Rochester, Staten Island, Syracuse, UticaOhio: Akron, Canton, Cleveland, Columbus, Dayton, Hamilton, Lima, Lorrain, Portsmouth, Springfield, Toledo, Warren, YoungstownOregon: PortlandPennsylvania: Altoona, Erie, Johnstown, New Castle, Philadelphia, PittsburghSouth Carolina: AugustaTennessee: Chattanooga, KnoxvilleTexas: DallasVirginia: Lynchburg, Norfolk, Richmond, RoanokeWashington: Seattle, Spokane, TacomaWisconsin: Kenosha, Milwaukee, Oshkosh, RacineWest Virginia: Charleston, WheelingAn example of a map produced by the HOLC of Philadelphia: