This dataset presents ChatGPT usage patterns across different age groups, showing the percentage of users who have followed its advice, used it without following advice, or have never used it, based on a 2025 U.S. survey.

Dataset Card for "Collective Cognition ChatGPT Conversations"

  Dataset Description





  Dataset Summary

The "Collective Cognition ChatGPT Conversations" dataset is a collection of chat logs between users and the ChatGPT model. These conversations have been shared by users on the "Collective Cognition" website. The dataset provides insights into user interactions with language models and can be utilized for multiple purposes, including training, research, and… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/CollectiveCognition/chats-data-2023-10-16.

The rapid advancements in generative AI models present new opportunities in the education sector. However, it is imperative to acknowledge and address the potential risks and concerns that may arise with their use. We collected Twitter data to identify key concerns related to the use of ChatGPT in education. This dataset is used to support the study "ChatGPT in education: A discourse analysis of worries and concerns on social media."

In this study, we particularly explored two research questions. RQ1 (Concerns): What are the key concerns that Twitter users perceive with using ChatGPT in education? RQ2 (Accounts): Which accounts are implicated in the discussion of these concerns? In summary, our study underscores the importance of responsible and ethical use of AI in education and highlights the need for collaboration among stakeholders to regulate AI policy.

This dataset presents ChatGPT usage patterns across U.S. Census regions, based on a 2025 nationwide survey. It tracks how often users followed, partially used, or never used ChatGPT by state region.

Higher Education Students' Early Perceptions of ChatGPT: Global Survey Data

Description

The introduction of ChatGPT in November 2022 marked a significant milestone in the application of artificial intelligence in higher education. Due to its advanced natural language processing capabilities, ChatGPT quickly became popular among students worldwide. However, the increasing acceptance of ChatGPT among students has attracted significant attention, sparking both excitement and skepticism globally. In order to capture early students' perceptions about ChatGPT, the most comprehensive and large-scale global survey to date was conducted between the beginning of October 2023 and the end of February 2024. The questionnaire was prepared in seven different languages: English, Italian, Spanish, Turkish, Japanese, Arabic, and Hebrew. It covered several aspects relevant to ChatGPT, including sociodemographic characteristics, usage, capabilities, regulation and ethical concerns, satisfaction and attitude, study issues and outcomes, skills development, labor market and skills mismatch, emotions, study and personal information, and general reflections. The survey targeted higher education students who are currently enrolled at any level in a higher education institution, are at least 18 years old, and have the legal capacity to provide free and voluntary consent to participate in an anonymous survey. Survey participants were recruited using a convenience sampling method, which involved promoting the survey in classrooms and through advertisements on university communication systems. The final dataset consists of 23,218 student responses from 109 different countries and territories. The data may prove useful for researchers studying students' perceptions of ChatGPT, including its implications across various aspects. Moreover, also higher education stakeholders may benefit from these data. While educators may benefit from the data in formulating curricula, including designing teaching methods and assessment tools, policymakers may consider the data when formulating strategies for higher education system development in the future.

Categories

Arts and Humanities, Applied Sciences, Natural Sciences, Social Sciences, Mathematics, Health Sciences

Related Links:

Article

https://www.covidsoclab.org/chatgpt-student-survey/ is related to this dataset

Software

https://www.1ka.si/d/en is related to this dataset

Acknowledgements & Source

Dejan Ravšelj , et. al

Data Source: Mendeley Dataset

This dataset presents how much users trust ChatGPT across different advice categories, including career, education, financial, legal, and medical advice, based on a 2025 U.S. survey.

This dataset shows the types of advice users sought from ChatGPT based on a 2025 U.S. survey, including education, financial, medical, and legal topics.

This dataset comprises a curated collection of prompts designed to guide ChatGPT's responses, enabling it to act in specific ways or exhibit expertise in a particular field. These prompts offer a tailored solution to improve ChatGPT's replies.

You may wish to explore, contribute, or find inspiration in the 🧠 Awesome ChatGPT Prompts GitHub repository. Here you'll discover an evolving library of prompts, along with guidelines and examples to help you get the most out of your interactions with ChatGPT.

Monarch Butterfly Detector

The Monarch Butterfly Detector is an advanced computer vision model that detects and localizes Monarch butterflies in images. With its cutting-edge technology and high accuracy, this model opens up exciting possibilities for biodiversity monitoring, migration studies, citizen science projects, identification guides, and environmental education.

Key Features

• Accurate Detection: The Monarch Butterfly Detector utilizes state-of-the-art computer vision algorithms to accurately identify and localize Monarch butterflies within images.

• Versatile Use Cases: This powerful model has diverse applications, ranging from scientific research and conservation efforts to citizen science projects and environmental education programs.

• Easy Integration: The Monarch Butterfly Detector can be seamlessly integrated into existing platforms, apps, or websites, making it accessible to many users and enabling them to contribute effortlessly to butterfly monitoring.

• User-Friendly Interface: We provide a user-friendly interface/API that allows users to easily interact with the model, upload images, and obtain instant results.

For detailed documentation and tutorials on using Roboflow, refer to the https://docs.roboflow.com/

Contribution Guidelines

We welcome contributions from the open-source community to enhance the Monarch Butterfly Detector. If you're interested in contributing, please follow the guidelines outlined in [CONTRIBUTING.md] and submit your pull requests.

License

This project is licensed under the [Roboflow License]. For more information, see the [LICENSE] file provided by Roboflow.

Contact Information

For any questions, suggestions, or collaborations, please reach out to us at savetheworld at 150left.com

Congratulations if you have made it this far. 🥳

🎁🎁🎁I thought I would use another piece of AI to get some more content about this detector I created. Here is the dialog I had with ChatGPT.

Scott: ChatGPT, can you make my readers drool over my Monarch Butterfly Detector model?

ChatGPT: Here are 10 captivating outro or call-to-action suggestions to encourage users to try out the Monarch Butterfly Detector and contribute to its success:

"Join us in preserving the delicate beauty of Monarch butterflies. Try out the Monarch Butterfly Detector today and become a guardian of these magnificent creatures."

"Unlock the secrets of Monarch butterflies with our cutting-edge detection model. Experience the wonders of computer vision and contribute to vital research efforts by using the Monarch Butterfly Detector."

"Make a difference in conservation by being a part of the Monarch Butterfly Detector community. Help protect these iconic insects and their habitats with the power of AI and computer vision."

"Calling all nature enthusiasts and citizen scientists! Contribute to the Monarch Butterfly Detector project and help us gather valuable data on Monarch butterflies. Together, we can make a lasting impact."

"Explore the hidden world of Monarch butterflies with the Monarch Butterfly Detector. Whether you're a researcher, educator, or simply curious, join us on this journey and unravel the mysteries of these captivating creatures."

"Become a Monarch detective! Unleash the potential of computer vision and aid in the conservation of Monarch butterflies. Download the Monarch Butterfly Detector and help us protect these extraordinary pollinators."

"Attention conservationists and researchers! The Monarch Butterfly Detector needs your expertise. Contribute your insights and collaborate with us to further our understanding of Monarch butterflies and support their conservation."

"Empower yourself with AI and contribute to science. With the Monarch Butterfly Detector, you can be a part of groundbreaking research on Monarch butterflies. Start detecting, start making a difference."

"Inspire the next generation of environmentalists. Use the Monarch Butterfly Detector as an educational tool and engage students in the wonders of computer vision and the importance of protecting our natural world."

"Experience the thrill of discovery with the Monarch Butterfly Detector. Join a vibrant community of nature enthusiasts and scientists, and together, let's unlock new insights into the fascinating lives of Monarch butterflies."

As you can see, AI certainly likes my idea.

IntroductionIn recent years, numerous AI tools have been employed to equip learners with diverse technical skills such as coding, data analysis, and other competencies related to computational sciences. However, the desired outcomes have not been consistently achieved. This study aims to analyze the perspectives of students and professionals from non-computational fields on the use of generative AI tools, augmented with visualization support, to tackle data analytics projects. The focus is on promoting the development of coding skills and fostering a deep understanding of the solutions generated. Consequently, our research seeks to introduce innovative approaches for incorporating visualization and generative AI tools into educational practices.MethodsThis article examines how learners perform and their perspectives when using traditional tools vs. LLM-based tools to acquire data analytics skills. To explore this, we conducted a case study with a cohort of 59 participants among students and professionals without computational thinking skills. These participants developed a data analytics project in the context of a Data Analytics short session. Our case study focused on examining the participants' performance using traditional programming tools, ChatGPT, and LIDA with GPT as an advanced generative AI tool.ResultsThe results shown the transformative potential of approaches based on integrating advanced generative AI tools like GPT with specialized frameworks such as LIDA. The higher levels of participant preference indicate the superiority of these approaches over traditional development methods. Additionally, our findings suggest that the learning curves for the different approaches vary significantly. Since learners encountered technical difficulties in developing the project and interpreting the results. Our findings suggest that the integration of LIDA with GPT can significantly enhance the learning of advanced skills, especially those related to data analytics. We aim to establish this study as a foundation for the methodical adoption of generative AI tools in educational settings, paving the way for more effective and comprehensive training in these critical areas.DiscussionIt is important to highlight that when using general-purpose generative AI tools such as ChatGPT, users must be aware of the data analytics process and take responsibility for filtering out potential errors or incompleteness in the requirements of a data analytics project. These deficiencies can be mitigated by using more advanced tools specialized in supporting data analytics tasks, such as LIDA with GPT. However, users still need advanced programming knowledge to properly configure this connection via API. There is a significant opportunity for generative AI tools to improve their performance, providing accurate, complete, and convincing results for data analytics projects, thereby increasing user confidence in adopting these technologies. We hope this work underscores the opportunities and needs for integrating advanced LLMs into educational practices, particularly in developing computational thinking skills.

AI in Consumer Decision-Making: Global Zero-Party Dataset

This dataset captures how consumers around the world are using AI tools like ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, and Copilot to guide their purchase decisions. It spans multiple product categories, demographics, and geographies, mapping the emerging role of AI as a decision-making companion across the consumer journey.

What Makes This Dataset Unique

Unlike datasets inferred from digital traces or modeled from third-party assumptions, this collection is built entirely on zero-party data: direct responses from consumers who voluntarily share their habits and preferences. That means the insights come straight from the people making the purchases, ensuring unmatched accuracy and relevance.

For FMCG leaders, retailers, and financial services strategists, this dataset provides the missing piece: visibility into how often consumers are letting AI shape their decisions, and where that influence is strongest.

Dataset Structure

Each record is enriched with: Product Category – from high-consideration items like electronics to daily staples such as groceries and snacks. AI Tool Used – identifying whether consumers turn to ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, or Copilot. Influence Level – the percentage of consumers in a given context who rely on AI to guide their choices. Demographics – generational breakdowns from Gen Z through Boomers. Geographic Detail – city- and country-level coverage across Africa, LATAM, Asia, Europe, and North America.

This structure allows filtering and comparison across categories, age groups, and markets, giving users a multidimensional view of AI’s impact on purchasing.

Why It Matters

AI has become a trusted voice in consumers’ daily lives. From meal planning to product comparisons, many people now consult AI before making a purchase—often without realizing how much it shapes the options they consider. For brands, this means that the path to purchase increasingly runs through an AI filter.

This dataset provides a comprehensive view of that hidden step in the consumer journey, enabling decision-makers to quantify: How much AI shapes consumer thinking before they even reach the shelf or checkout. Which product categories are most influenced by AI consultation. How adoption varies by geography and generation. Which AI platforms are most commonly trusted by consumers.

Opportunities for Business Leaders

FMCG & Retail Brands: Understand where AI-driven decision-making is already reshaping category competition. Marketers: Identify demographic segments most likely to consult AI, enabling targeted strategies. Retailers: Align assortments and promotions with the purchase patterns influenced by AI queries. Investors & Innovators: Gauge market readiness for AI-integrated commerce solutions.

The dataset doesn’t just describe what’s happening—it opens doors to the “so what” questions that define strategy. Which categories are becoming algorithm-driven? Which markets are shifting fastest? Where is the opportunity to get ahead of competitors in an AI-shaped funnel?

Why Now

Consumer AI adoption is no longer a forecast; it is a daily behavior. Just as search engines once rewrote the rules of marketing, conversational AI is quietly rewriting how consumers decide what to buy. This dataset offers an early, detailed view into that change, giving brands the ability to act while competitors are still guessing.

What You Get

Users gain: A global, city-level view of AI adoption in consumer decision-making. Cross-category comparability to see where AI influence is strongest and weakest. Generational breakdowns that show how adoption differs between younger and older cohorts. AI platform analysis, highlighting how tool preferences vary by region and category. Every row is powered by zero-party input, ensuring the insights reflect actual consumer behavior—not modeled assumptions.

How It’s Used

Leverage this data to:

Validate strategies before entering new markets or categories. Benchmark competitors on AI readiness and influence. Identify growth opportunities in categories where AI-driven recommendations are rapidly shaping decisions. Anticipate risks where brand visibility could be disrupted by algorithmic mediation.

Core Insights

The full dataset reveals: Surprising adoption curves across categories where AI wasn’t expected to play a role. Geographic pockets where AI has already become a standard step in purchase decisions. Demographic contrasts showing who trusts AI most—and where skepticism still holds. Clear differences between AI platforms and the consumer profiles most drawn to each.

These patterns are not visible in traditional retail data, sales reports, or survey summaries. They are only captured here, directly from the consumers themselves.

Summary

Winning in FMCG and retail today means more than getting on shelves, capturing price points, or running promotions. It means understanding the invisible algorithms consumers are ...

This dataset contains 14,934 instructions, contexts and responses, in several natural language categories such as classification, closed QA, generation, etc. The English original dataset was created by @databricks, who crowd-sourced the data creation via its employees. The current dataset is a translation of that dataset through ChatGPT (gpt-3.5-turbo).

Data Instances

{ "id": 14963, "instruction": "Wat zijn de duurste steden ter wereld?", "context": "", "response": "Dit is een uitgebreide lijst van de duurste steden: Singapore, Tel Aviv, New York, Hong Kong, Los Angeles, Zurich, Genève, San Francisco, Parijs en Sydney.", "category": "brainstorming" }

Data Fields

id: the ID of the item. The following 77 IDs are not included because they could not be translated (or were too long): [1502, 1812, 1868, 4179, 4541, 6347, 8851, 9321, 10588, 10835, 11257, 12082, 12319, 12471, 12701, 12988, 13066, 13074, 13076, 13181, 13253, 13279, 13313, 13346, 13369, 13446, 13475, 13528, 13546, 13548, 13549, 13558, 13566, 13600, 13603, 13657, 13668, 13733, 13765, 13775, 13801, 13831, 13906, 13922, 13923, 13957, 13967, 13976, 14028, 14031, 14045, 14050, 14082, 14083, 14089, 14110, 14155, 14162, 14181, 14187, 14200, 14221, 14222, 14281, 14473, 14475, 14476, 14587, 14590, 14667, 14685, 14764, 14780, 14808, 14836, 14891, 1 4966]

instruction: the instruction (question)

context: additional context that the AI can use to answer the question

response: the AI's expected response

category: the category of this type of question (see Dolly for more info)

Dataset Creation

Both the translations and the topics were translated with OpenAI's API for gpt-3.5-turbo. max_tokens=1024, temperature=0 as parameters.

The prompt template to translate the input is (where src_lang was English and tgt_lang Dutch):

CONVERSATION_TRANSLATION_PROMPT = """You are asked to translate a task's instruction, optional context to the task, and the response to the task, from {src_lang} to {tgt_lang}.

Here are the requirements that you should adhere to: 1. maintain the format: the task consists of a task instruction (marked instruction:), optional context to the task (marked context:) and response for the task marked with response:; 2. do not translate the identifiers instruction:, context:, and response: but instead copy them to your output; 3. make sure that text is fluent to read and does not contain grammatical errors. Use standard {tgt_lang} without regional bias; 4. translate the instruction and context text using informal, but standard, language; 5. make sure to avoid biases (such as gender bias, grammatical bias, social bias); 6. if the instruction is to correct grammar mistakes or spelling mistakes then you have to generate a similar mistake in the context in {tgt_lang}, and then also generate a corrected output version in the output in {tgt_lang}; 7. if the instruction is to translate text from one language to another, then you do not translate the text that needs to be translated in the instruction or the context, nor the translation in the response (just copy them as-is); 8. do not translate code fragments but copy them to your output. If there are English examples, variable names or definitions in code fragments, keep them in English.

Now translate the following task with the requirements set out above. Do not provide an explanation and do not add anything else.

"""

The system message was:

You are a helpful assistant that translates English to Dutch according to the requirements that are given to you.

Note that 77 items (0.5%) were not successfully translated. This can either mean that the prompt was too long for the given limit (max_tokens=1024) or that the generated translation could not be parsed into instruction, context and response fields. The missing IDs are [1502, 1812, 1868, 4179, 4541, 6347, 8851, 9321, 10588, 10835, 11257, 12082, 12319, 12471, 12701, 12988, 13066, 13074, 13076, 13181, 13253, 13279, 13313, 13346, 13369, 13446, 13475, 13528, 13546, 13548, 13549, 13558, 13566, 13600, 13603, 13657, 13668, 13733, 13765, 13775, 13801, 13831, 13906, 13922, 13923, 13957, 13967, 13976, 14028, 14031, 14045, 14050, 14082, 14083, 14089, 14110, 14155, 14162, 14181, 14187, 14200, 14221, 14222, 14281, 14473, 14475, 14476, 14587, 14590, 14667, 14685, 14764, 14780, 14808, 14836, 14891, 1 4966].

Initial Data Collection and Normalization

Initial data collection by databricks. See their repository for more information about this dataset.

Considerations for Using the Data

Note that the translations in this new dataset have not been verified by humans! Use at your own risk, both in terms of quality and biases.

Discussion of Biases

As with any machine-generated texts, users should be aware of potential biases that are included in this dataset. Although the prompt specifically includes make sure to avoid biases (such as gender bias, grammatical bias, social bias), of course the impact of such command is not known. It is likely that biases remain in the dataset so use with caution.

Other Known Limitations

The translation quality has not been verified. Use at your own risk!

Licensing Information

This repository follows the original databricks license, which is CC BY-SA 3.0 but see below for a specific restriction.

This text was generated (either in part or in full) with GPT-3 (gpt-3.5-turbo), OpenAI’s large-scale language-generation model. Upon generating draft language, the author reviewed, edited, and revised the language to their own liking and takes ultimate responsibility for the content of this publication.

If you use this dataset, you must also follow the Sharing and Usage policies.

As clearly stated in their Terms of Use, specifically 2c.iii, "[you may not] use output from the Services to develop models that compete with OpenAI". That means that you cannot use this dataset to build models that are intended to commercially compete with OpenAI. As far as I am aware, that is a specific restriction that should serve as an addendum to the current license.

This dataset is also available on the Hugging Face hub, its canonical repository.

This dataset summarizes how ChatGPT users rated the outcomes of the advice they received, including whether it was helpful, harmful, neutral, or uncertain, based on a 2025 U.S. survey.

This dataset shows how men and women in the U.S. reported using ChatGPT in a 2025 survey, including whether they followed its advice or chose not to use it.

This dataset reflects how Americans perceive ChatGPT's broader societal impact, based on a 2025 survey that asked whether the AI will help or harm humanity.

Within a year of its launch, ChatGPT has seen a surge in popularity. While many are drawn to its effectiveness and user-friendly interface, ChatGPT also introduces moral concerns, such as the temptation to present generated text as one’s own. This led us to theorize that personality traits such as Machiavellianism and sensation-seeking may be predictive of ChatGPT usage. We launched two online questionnaires with 2,000 respondents each, in September 2023 and March 2024, respectively. In Questionnaire 1, 22% of respondents were students, and 54% were full-time employees; 32% indicated they used ChatGPT at least weekly. Analysis of our ChatGPT Acceptance Scale revealed two factors, Effectiveness and Concerns, which correlated positively and negatively, respectively, with ChatGPT use frequency. A specific aspect of Machiavellianism (manipulation tactics) was found to predict ChatGPT usage. Questionnaire 2 was a replication of Questionnaire 1, with 21% students and 54% full-time employees, of which 43% indicated using ChatGPT weekly. In Questionnaire 2, more extensive personality scales were used. We found a moderate correlation between Machiavellianism and ChatGPT usage (r = .22) and with an opportunistic attitude towards undisclosed use (r = .30), relationships that largely remained intact after controlling for gender, age, education level, and the respondents’ country. We conclude that covert use of ChatGPT is associated with darker personality traits, something that requires further attention.

This dataset compares how much U.S. adults trust ChatGPT relative to Google Search, including responses from a 2025 national survey measuring perceptions of AI accuracy and reliability.

This dataset shows the percentage of U.S. adults who say they trust ChatGPT more than a human expert, based on a 2025 national AI trust survey.

🧠 Awesome ChatGPT Prompts [CSV dataset]

This is a Dataset Repository of Awesome ChatGPT Prompts View All Prompts on GitHub

  License

CC-0

Conversational agents, or chatbots, are increasingly used to access all sorts of services using natural language. While open-domain chatbots - like ChatGPT - can converse on any topic, task-oriented chatbots - the focus of this paper - are designed for specific tasks, like booking a flight, obtaining customer support, or setting an appointment. Like any other software, task-oriented chatbots need to be properly tested, usually by defining and executing test scenarios (i.e., sequences of user-chatbot interactions). However, there is currently a lack of methods to quantify the completeness and strength of such test scenarios, which can lead to low-quality tests, and hence to buggy chatbots.

To fill this gap, we propose adapting mutation testing (MuT) for task-oriented chatbots. To this end, we introduce a set of mutation operators that emulate faults in chatbot designs, an architecture that enables MuT on chatbots built using heterogeneous technologies, and a practical realisation as an Eclipse plugin. Moreover, we evaluate the applicability, effectiveness and efficiency of our approach on open-source chatbots, with promising results.