Facebook
TwitterMIT Licensehttps://opensource.org/licenses/MIT
License information was derived automatically
Overview The Stack Overflow Developer Survey Dataset represents one of the most trusted and comprehensive sources of information about the global developer community. Collected by Stack Overflow through its annual survey, the dataset provides insights into the demographics, preferences, habits, and career paths of developers.
This dataset is frequently used for: - Analyzing trends in programming languages, tools, and technologies. - Understanding developer job satisfaction, compensation, and work environments. - Studying global and regional differences in developer demographics and experience.
The data has of two CSV files, "survey_results_public" that consist of data and "survey_results_schema" that describes each column in detail.
Data Dictionary: All the details are in "survey_results_schema.csv"
Demographic & Background Information - Respondent: A unique identifier for each survey participant. - MainBranch: Describes whether the respondent is a professional developer, student, hobbyist, etc. - Country: The country where the respondent lives. - Age: The respondent's age. - Gender: The gender identity of the respondent. - Ethnicity: Ethnic background (when available). - EdLevel: The highest level of formal education completed. - UndergradMajor: The respondent's undergraduate major. - Hobbyist: Indicates whether the person codes as a hobby (Yes/No).
Employment & Professional Experience - Employment: Employment status (full-time, part-time, unemployed, student, etc.). - DevType: Types of developer roles the respondent identifies with (e.g., Web Developer, Data Scientist). - YearsCode: Number of years the respondent has been coding. - YearsCodePro: Number of years coding professionally. - JobSat: Job satisfaction level. - CareerSat: Career satisfaction level. - WorkWeekHrs: Approximate hours worked per week. - RemoteWork: Whether the respondent works remotely and how frequently.
Compensation - CompTotal: Total compensation in USD (including salary, bonuses, etc.). - CompFreq: Frequency of compensation (e.g., yearly, monthly).
Learning & Education - LearnCode: How the respondent first learned to code (e.g., online courses, university). - LearnCodeOnline: Online resources used (e.g., YouTube, freeCodeCamp). - LearnCodeCoursesCert: Whether the respondent has taken online courses or earned certifications.
Technology & Tools - LanguageHaveWorkedWith: Programming languages the respondent has used. - LanguageWantToWorkWith: Languages the respondent is interested in learning or using more. - DatabaseHaveWorkedWith: Databases the respondent has experience with. - PlatformHaveWorkedWith: Platforms used (e.g., Linux, AWS, Android). - OpSys: The operating system used most often. - NEWCollabToolsHaveWorkedWith: Collaboration tools used (e.g., Slack, Teams, Zoom). - NEWStuck: How often the respondent feels stuck when coding. - ToolsTechHaveWorkedWith: Frameworks and technologies respondents have worked with.
Online Presence & Community - SOAccount: Whether the respondent has a Stack Overflow account. - SOPartFreq: How often the respondent participates on Stack Overflow. - SOVisitFreq: Frequency of visiting Stack Overflow. - SOComm: Whether the respondent feels welcome in the Stack Overflow community. - OpenSourcer: Level of involvement in open-source contributions.
Opinions & Preferences - WorkChallenge: Challenges faced at work (e.g., unclear requirements, unrealistic expectations). - JobFactors: Important job factors (e.g., salary, work-life balance, technologies used). - MentalHealth: Questions on how mental health affects or is affected by their job.
Facebook
TwitterOur Web Scraping dataset includes such data points as company name, location, headcount, industry, and size, among others. It offers extensive fresh and historical data, including even companies that operate in stealth mode.
For lead generation
With millions of companies from around the globe, this scraped data enables you to filter potential clients based on specific criteria and hasten the conversion process.
Use cases
For market and business analysis
Our Web Scraping Data on companies gives information about millions of businesses, allowing you to evaluate your competitors.
Use cases
For Investors
We recommend Web Scraping Data for investors to discover and evaluate businesses with the highest potential.
Gain strategic business insights, enhance decision-making, and maintain algorithms that signal investment opportunities with Coresignal’s global Web Scraping Data.
Use cases
For sales prospecting
Web Scraping Data saves time your employees would otherwise use it to find potential clients and choose the best prospects manually.
Use cases
Facebook
TwitterPredictLeads Job Openings Data provides high-quality hiring insights sourced directly from company websites - not job boards. Using advanced web scraping technology, our dataset offers real-time access to job trends, salaries, and skills demand, making it a valuable resource for B2B sales, recruiting, investment analysis, and competitive intelligence.
Key Features:
✅232M+ Job Postings Tracked – Data sourced from 92 Million company websites worldwide. ✅7,1M+ Active Job Openings – Updated in real-time to reflect hiring demand. ✅Salary & Compensation Insights – Extract salary ranges, contract types, and job seniority levels. ✅Technology & Skill Tracking – Identify emerging tech trends and industry demands. ✅Company Data Enrichment – Link job postings to employer domains, firmographics, and growth signals. ✅Web Scraping Precision – Directly sourced from employer websites for unmatched accuracy.
Primary Attributes:
Job Metadata:
Salary Data (salary_data)
Occupational Data (onet_data) (object, nullable)
Additional Attributes:
📌 Trusted by enterprises, recruiters, and investors for high-precision job market insights.
PredictLeads Dataset: https://docs.predictleads.com/v3/guide/job_openings_dataset
Facebook
TwitterA dataset of web design keywords, including their definitions, synonyms, antonyms, search volume and costs.
Facebook
TwitterThe World Development Indicators (WDI) is the primary World Bank collection of development indicators, compiled from officially recognized international sources. It presents the most current and accurate global development data available, and includes national, regional and global estimates. You can create your own queries; generate tables, charts, and maps; and easily save, embed, and share them. (From the World Bank DataBank website). It is one of the databases in the World Bank DataBank.
Facebook
TwitterNo longer existsThe dataset comprises the published annual reports of approximately 180 companies involved in mining or mining-related activities. The great majority are in English or are bilingual with English. A 5-year collection is maintained on a rolling basis, i.e. only the most recent 5 years' reports are retained. The dataset comprises the reports companies deemed to be the most important in minerals production world-wide. The collection is incomplete as many companies now distribute their annual reports via their web sites rather than send printed copies.
Facebook
TwitterThis Private Company Data dataset is a refined version of our company datasets, consisting of 35M+ data records.
It’s an excellent data solution for companies with limited data engineering capabilities and those who want to reduce their time to value. You get filtered, cleaned, unified, and standardized B2B private company data. This data is also enriched by leveraging a carefully instructed large language model (LLM).
AI-powered data enrichment offers more accurate information in key data fields, such as company descriptions. It also produces over 20 additional data points that are very valuable to B2B businesses. Enhancing and highlighting the most important information in web data contributes to quicker time to value, making data processing much faster and easier.
For your convenience, you can choose from multiple data formats (Parquet, JSON, JSONL, or CSV) and select suitable delivery frequency (quarterly, monthly, or weekly).
Coresignal is a leading private company data provider in the web data sphere with an extensive focus on firmographic data and public employee profiles. More than 3B data records in different categories enable companies to build data-driven products and generate actionable insights. Coresignal is exceptional in terms of data freshness, with 890M+ records updated monthly for unprecedented accuracy and relevance.
Facebook
TwitterOur Web Data dataset includes such data points as company name, location, headcount, industry, and size, among others. It offers extensive fresh and historical data, including even companies that operate in stealth mode.
For lead generation
With millions of companies worldwide, Web Company Database helps you filter potential clients based on custom criteria and speed up the conversion process.
Use cases
For market and business analysis
Our Web Company Data provides information about millions of companies, allowing you to find your competitors and see their weaknesses and strengths.
Use cases
For Investors
We recommend B2B Web Data for investors to discover and evaluate businesses with the highest potential.
Gain strategic business insights, enhance decision-making, and maintain algorithms that signal investment opportunities with Coresignal’s global B2B Web Dataset.
Use cases
For sales prospecting
B2B Web Database saves time your employees would otherwise use to search for potential clients manually.
Use cases
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This dataset is about stocks. It has 1 row and is filtered where the company is World. It features 8 columns including stock name, company, exchange, and exchange symbol.
Facebook
TwitterIn 2023, the tech skill most in demand by recruiters was web development. This was closely followed by DevOps and database software skills. Interestingly, over ** percent of recruiters were actively seeking individuals with cybersecurity skills. Not far behind, AI/Machine learning/Deep learning ranked fourth, with approximately ** percent of respondents identifying it as their most sought-after tech skill. These preferences align with the skills that developers worldwide are keen to acquire, particularly web development and AI/Machine learning/Deep learning. AI at the forefront of IT skills Since the release of ChatGPT in late 2022, demand for AI and automation skills has increased across all sectors. In 2023, ChatGPT was the leading technology skill globally according to topic consumption on Udemy Business, experiencing a massive growth of over ***** percent in global topic consumption. In the same year, over ** percent of software developers reported using AI to help write code in the development workflow, while another ** percent said they currently use it for debugging code. Different languages for different needs JavaScript and Java, commonly used for back-end and front-end web development, were the most demanded programming languages worldwide in 2022, followed by SQL and Python. By industry, JavaScript and Java hold the fort in the IT services and aviation industries, while SQL was more popular in the healthcare sector as well as the marketing and advertising industries. Python, well suited for data science applications, was more commonly used in the manufacturing, education, and energy industries.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://www.wiseguyreports.com/pages/privacy-policyhttps://www.wiseguyreports.com/pages/privacy-policy
| BASE YEAR | 2024 |
| HISTORICAL DATA | 2019 - 2023 |
| REGIONS COVERED | North America, Europe, APAC, South America, MEA |
| REPORT COVERAGE | Revenue Forecast, Competitive Landscape, Growth Factors, and Trends |
| MARKET SIZE 2024 | 4.89(USD Billion) |
| MARKET SIZE 2025 | 5.19(USD Billion) |
| MARKET SIZE 2035 | 9.5(USD Billion) |
| SEGMENTS COVERED | Application, Deployment Type, End User, Service Type, Regional |
| COUNTRIES COVERED | US, Canada, Germany, UK, France, Russia, Italy, Spain, Rest of Europe, China, India, Japan, South Korea, Malaysia, Thailand, Indonesia, Rest of APAC, Brazil, Mexico, Argentina, Rest of South America, GCC, South Africa, Rest of MEA |
| KEY MARKET DYNAMICS | Increasing data integration needs, Rising demand for cloud services, Growth in big data analytics, Emergence of AI and machine learning, Need for real-time data access |
| MARKET FORECAST UNITS | USD Billion |
| KEY COMPANIES PROFILED | MySQL AB, IBM, Snowflake, Oracle, Sybase, SAP, PostgreSQL Global Development Group, Microsoft, MongoDB, Cloudera, Microsoft SQL Server, Teradata |
| MARKET FORECAST PERIOD | 2025 - 2035 |
| KEY MARKET OPPORTUNITIES | Cloud-based database solutions, Increased demand for data integration, Rising adoption of IoT data management, Growth in big data analytics, Enhanced data security requirements |
| COMPOUND ANNUAL GROWTH RATE (CAGR) | 6.3% (2025 - 2035) |
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This dataset thoroughly evaluates the web performance metrics for 234 museums worldwide. It includes 23 variables that assess technical performance, usability, and organizational details. The dataset contains information such as the organization’s name, domain, country, physical address, and the type of content management system (CMS) utilized. Performance metrics are available for both mobile and desktop platforms, addressing accessibility compliance, adherence to best practices, and search engine optimization (SEO). Specific metrics for mobile and desktop speed performance include First Contentful Paint (FCP), Total Blocking Time (TBT), Speed Index, Largest Contentful Paint (LCP), and Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS).
Data collection was conducted using PageSpeed Insights. The CMS employed by each organization was identified through the WhatCMS tool. This dataset serves as a useful resource for researchers, web developers, and cultural institutions seeking to enhance digital inclusivity, optimize website performance, and benchmark their digital presence against global standards. It also provides a solid foundation for studying web optimization, accessibility, and the broader digital transformation of cultural heritage institutions.It is noted that information regarding dataset's authors has been erased as the dataset is used in a research paper submitted to Metrics for peer review evaluation and potential publication.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This dataset is about stocks. It has 1 row and is filtered where the company is Global Self Storage. It features 8 columns including stock name, company, exchange, and exchange symbol.
Facebook
TwitterPublic Domain Mark 1.0https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/
License information was derived automatically
The Sea Around Us is a research initiative at The University of British Columbia (located at the Institute for the Oceans and Fisheries, formerly Fisheries Centre) that assesses the impact of fisheries on the marine ecosystems of the world, and offers mitigating solutions to a range of stakeholders.
The Sea Around Us was initiated in collaboration with The Pew Charitable Trusts in 1999, and in 2014, the Sea Around Us also began a collaboration with The Paul G. Allen Family Foundation to provide African and Asian countries with more accurate and comprehensive fisheries data.
The Sea Around Us provides data and analyses through View Data, articles in peer-reviewed journals, and other media (News). The Sea Around Us regularly update products at the scale of countries’ Exclusive Economic Zones, Large Marine Ecosystems, the High Seas and other spatial scales, and as global maps and summaries.
The Sea Around Us emphasizes catch time series starting in 1950, and related series (e.g., landed value and catch by flag state, fishing sector and catch type), and fisheries-related information on every maritime country (e.g., government subsidies, marine biodiversity). Information is also offered on sub-projects, e.g., the historic expansion of fisheries, the performance of Regional Fisheries Management Organizations, or the likely impact of climate change on fisheries.
The information and data presented on their website is freely available to any user, granted that its source is acknowledged. The Sea Around Us is aware that this information may be incomplete. Please let them know about this via the feedback options available on this website.
If you cite or display any content from the Site, or reference the Sea Around Us, the Sea Around Us – Indian Ocean, the University of British Columbia or the University of Western Australia, in any format, written or otherwise, including print or web publications, presentations, grant applications, websites, other online applications such as blogs, or other works, you must provide appropriate acknowledgement using a citation consistent with the following standard:
When referring to various datasets downloaded from the website, and/or its concept or design, or to several datasets extracted from its underlying databases, cite its architects. Example: Pauly D., Zeller D., Palomares M.L.D. (Editors), 2020. Sea Around Us Concepts, Design and Data (seaaroundus.org).
When referring to a set of values extracted for a given country, EEZ or territory, cite the most recent catch reconstruction report or paper (available on the website) for that country, EEZ or territory. Example: For the Mexican Pacific EEZ, the citation should be “Cisneros-Montemayor AM, Cisneros-Mata MA, Harper S and Pauly D (2015) Unreported marine fisheries catch in Mexico, 1950-2010. Fisheries Centre Working Paper #2015-22, University of British Columbia, Vancouver. 9 p.”, which is accessible on the EEZ page for Mexico (Pacific) on seaaroundus.org.
To help us track the use of Sea Around Us data, we would appreciate you also citing Pauly, Zeller, and Palomares (2020) as the source of the information in an appropriate part of your text;
When using data from our website that are not part of a typical catch reconstruction (e.g., catches by LME or other spatial entity, subsidies given to fisheries, the estuaries in a given country, or the surface area of a given EEZ), cite both the website and the study that generated the underlying database. Many of these can be derived from the ’methods’ texts associated with data pages on seaaroundus.org. Example: Sumaila et al. (2010) for subsides, Alder (2003) for estuaries and Claus et al. (2014) for EEZ delineations, respectively.
The Sea Around Us data are (where not otherwise regulated) under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). Notices regarding copyrights (© The University of British Columbia), license and disclaimer can be found under http://www.seaaroundus.org/terms-and-conditions/. References:
Alder J (2003) Putting the coast in the Sea Around Us Project. The Sea Around Us Newsletter (15): 1-2.
Cisneros-Montemayor AM, Cisneros-Mata MA, Harper S and Pauly D (2015) Unreported marine fisheries catch in Mexico, 1950-2010. Fisheries Centre Working Paper #2015-22, University of British Columbia, Vancouver. 9 p.
Pauly D, Zeller D, and Palomares M.L.D. (Editors) (2020) Sea Around Us Concepts, Design and Data (www.seaaroundus.org)
Claus S, De Hauwere N, Vanhoorne B, Deckers P, Souza Dias F, Hernandez F and Mees J (2014) Marine Regions: Towards a global standard for georeferenced marine names and boundaries. Marine Geodesy 37(2): 99-125.
Sumaila UR, Khan A, Dyck A, Watson R, Munro R, Tydemers P and Pauly D (2010) A bottom-up re-estimation of global fisheries subsidies. Journal of Bioeconomics 12: 201-225.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://www.wiseguyreports.com/pages/privacy-policyhttps://www.wiseguyreports.com/pages/privacy-policy
| BASE YEAR | 2024 |
| HISTORICAL DATA | 2019 - 2023 |
| REGIONS COVERED | North America, Europe, APAC, South America, MEA |
| REPORT COVERAGE | Revenue Forecast, Competitive Landscape, Growth Factors, and Trends |
| MARKET SIZE 2024 | 4.49(USD Billion) |
| MARKET SIZE 2025 | 4.72(USD Billion) |
| MARKET SIZE 2035 | 7.8(USD Billion) |
| SEGMENTS COVERED | Application, Deployment Model, End User, Industry Vertical, Regional |
| COUNTRIES COVERED | US, Canada, Germany, UK, France, Russia, Italy, Spain, Rest of Europe, China, India, Japan, South Korea, Malaysia, Thailand, Indonesia, Rest of APAC, Brazil, Mexico, Argentina, Rest of South America, GCC, South Africa, Rest of MEA |
| KEY MARKET DYNAMICS | increased data complexity, demand for scalability, integration with IoT, rising big data applications, need for real-time processing |
| MARKET FORECAST UNITS | USD Billion |
| KEY COMPANIES PROFILED | IBM, Redis, Objectivity, Oracle, Neo4j, InterSystems, SAP, SQLite, Microsoft, Versant, Cassandra, MongoDB, MarkLogic, BaseX, Couchbase, PostgresXL |
| MARKET FORECAST PERIOD | 2025 - 2035 |
| KEY MARKET OPPORTUNITIES | Rising demand for real-time analytics, Integration with IoT applications, Increased adoption of cloud-based solutions, Growing need for big data management, Enhanced support for complex data structures |
| COMPOUND ANNUAL GROWTH RATE (CAGR) | 5.1% (2025 - 2035) |
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
In the quest for advancing the field of continuous user authentication, we have meticulously crafted two comprehensive datasets: COUNT-OS-I and COUNT-OS-II, each harboring unique characteristics while sharing a common ground in their utility and design principles. These datasets encompass performance counters extracted from the Windows operating system, offering an intricate tapestry of data vital for evaluating and refining authentication models in real-world scenarios.Both datasets have been generated in real-world settings within public organizations in Brazil, ensuring their applicability and relevance to practical scenarios. Volunteers from diverse professional backgrounds participated in the data collection, contributing to the richness and variability of the data. Furthermore, both datasets were collected at a sample rate of every 5 seconds, providing a dense and detailed view of user interactions and system performance. The commitment to preserving user confidentiality is unwavering across both datasets, with pseudonymization applied meticulously to safeguard individual identities while maintaining data integrity and statistical robustness.The COUNT-OS-I dataset was specifically generated in a real-world scenario to evaluate our work on continuous user authentication. This dataset consist of performance counters extracted from the Windows operating system of 26 computers, representing 26 individual users. The data were collected on the computers of the Information Technology Department of a public organization in Brazil.The participants in this study were volunteers, with aged between 20 and 45 years old, consisting of both males and females. The majority of the participants were systems analysts and software developers who performed their routine work activities. There were no specific restrictions imposed on the tasks that the participants were required to perform during the data collection process.The participants used a variety of software applications as part of their regular work activities. This included web browsers such as Firefox, Chrome, and Edge, developer tools like Eclipse and SQL Developer, office programs such as Microsoft Office Word, Excel, and PowerPoint, as well as chat applications like WhatsApp. It's important to note that the list of applications mentioned is not exhaustive, and participants were not limited to using only these applications.For the COUNT-OS-I dataset, the data collected is based on computers with different characteristics and configurations in terms of hardware, operating system versions, and installed software. This diversity ensures a representative sample of real-world scenarios and allows for a comprehensive evaluation of the authentication model.During the data collection process, each sample was recorded at a frequency of every 5 seconds, capturing system data over a period of approximately 26 hours, on average, for each user. This duration provides sufficient data to analyze user behavior and system performance over an extended period. Each sample in the COUNT-OS-I dataset corresponds to a feature vector comprising 159 attributesThe COUNT-OS-II dataset was utilized to evaluate our work in a real-world setting. This dataset comprises performance counters extracted from the Windows operating system installed on 37 computers. These computers possess identical hardware configurations (CPU, memory, network, disk), operating systems, and software installations. The data collection was conducted within various departments of a public organization in Brazil.The participants in this study (37 users) were voluntary administration assistants who performed various administrative tasks as part of their routine work activities. No restrictions were imposed on the specific tasks they were assigned. The participants commonly utilized programs such as the Chrome browser and office applications like Office Word, Excel, and PowerPoint, in addition to the WhatsApp chat application.The data were collected over six days (approximately 48 hours), with sample collected at a 5-second interval. Each sample corresponds to a feature vector composed of 218 attributes. In this dataset, we also apply pseudonymization to hide users' sensitive information.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This dataset is about stocks. It has 1 row and is filtered where the company is FGIFinTech Global. It features 8 columns including stock name, company, exchange, and exchange symbol.
Facebook
TwitterU.S. Government Workshttps://www.usa.gov/government-works
License information was derived automatically
API using Global Imagery Browse Services (GIBS) designed to deliver global, full-resolution satellite imagery to users in a highly responsive manner, enabling interactive exploration of the Earth.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This dataset is about stocks. It has 1 row and is filtered where the company is Pearl Global. It features 8 columns including stock name, company, exchange, and exchange symbol.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This dataset is about stocks. It has 2 rows and is filtered where the company is Jervois Global. It features 8 columns including stock name, company, exchange, and exchange symbol.
Facebook
TwitterMIT Licensehttps://opensource.org/licenses/MIT
License information was derived automatically
Overview The Stack Overflow Developer Survey Dataset represents one of the most trusted and comprehensive sources of information about the global developer community. Collected by Stack Overflow through its annual survey, the dataset provides insights into the demographics, preferences, habits, and career paths of developers.
This dataset is frequently used for: - Analyzing trends in programming languages, tools, and technologies. - Understanding developer job satisfaction, compensation, and work environments. - Studying global and regional differences in developer demographics and experience.
The data has of two CSV files, "survey_results_public" that consist of data and "survey_results_schema" that describes each column in detail.
Data Dictionary: All the details are in "survey_results_schema.csv"
Demographic & Background Information - Respondent: A unique identifier for each survey participant. - MainBranch: Describes whether the respondent is a professional developer, student, hobbyist, etc. - Country: The country where the respondent lives. - Age: The respondent's age. - Gender: The gender identity of the respondent. - Ethnicity: Ethnic background (when available). - EdLevel: The highest level of formal education completed. - UndergradMajor: The respondent's undergraduate major. - Hobbyist: Indicates whether the person codes as a hobby (Yes/No).
Employment & Professional Experience - Employment: Employment status (full-time, part-time, unemployed, student, etc.). - DevType: Types of developer roles the respondent identifies with (e.g., Web Developer, Data Scientist). - YearsCode: Number of years the respondent has been coding. - YearsCodePro: Number of years coding professionally. - JobSat: Job satisfaction level. - CareerSat: Career satisfaction level. - WorkWeekHrs: Approximate hours worked per week. - RemoteWork: Whether the respondent works remotely and how frequently.
Compensation - CompTotal: Total compensation in USD (including salary, bonuses, etc.). - CompFreq: Frequency of compensation (e.g., yearly, monthly).
Learning & Education - LearnCode: How the respondent first learned to code (e.g., online courses, university). - LearnCodeOnline: Online resources used (e.g., YouTube, freeCodeCamp). - LearnCodeCoursesCert: Whether the respondent has taken online courses or earned certifications.
Technology & Tools - LanguageHaveWorkedWith: Programming languages the respondent has used. - LanguageWantToWorkWith: Languages the respondent is interested in learning or using more. - DatabaseHaveWorkedWith: Databases the respondent has experience with. - PlatformHaveWorkedWith: Platforms used (e.g., Linux, AWS, Android). - OpSys: The operating system used most often. - NEWCollabToolsHaveWorkedWith: Collaboration tools used (e.g., Slack, Teams, Zoom). - NEWStuck: How often the respondent feels stuck when coding. - ToolsTechHaveWorkedWith: Frameworks and technologies respondents have worked with.
Online Presence & Community - SOAccount: Whether the respondent has a Stack Overflow account. - SOPartFreq: How often the respondent participates on Stack Overflow. - SOVisitFreq: Frequency of visiting Stack Overflow. - SOComm: Whether the respondent feels welcome in the Stack Overflow community. - OpenSourcer: Level of involvement in open-source contributions.
Opinions & Preferences - WorkChallenge: Challenges faced at work (e.g., unclear requirements, unrealistic expectations). - JobFactors: Important job factors (e.g., salary, work-life balance, technologies used). - MentalHealth: Questions on how mental health affects or is affected by their job.