The study examined to the extent to which the parents of unmarried teenagers under 18 are informed that their daughters are attending a family planning clinic or abortion facility,how parents have been informed, and how notification requirements would effect the behavior of those teenagers whose parents do not know. The data are based on an Alan Guttmacher Institute survey of 1,241 young women seeking contraceptive services from 53 family planning clinics and another 1,170 seeking abortion services. The present data set contains data only for the teenagers seeking contraceptive services. Data were collected during the period of October, 1979 to March, 1980. Each respondent was asked whether or not her parents knew about her clinic visit for contraceptive services and, if her parents did not know, what ahe would have done (with respect to contraceptive and aexual behavior, and utilization of clinic services) if their notification had been required by the clinic. The study was also designed to determine what proportion of teenagers whose parents knew they were getting birth control services had told them voluntarily, what propor tion had told them because the clinic required them to do so, and whether or not the teenager talked about ways of preventing pregnancy with their parents. The survey asked each respondent if she had ever used the pill, IUD, or diaphragm and what birth control method she intended to obtain from the clinic. The 30 respondents who chose nonprescription methods are not included in this dataset. Finally, the women were asked with whom they lived: teenagers who did not answer that they were living with their husbands were assumed to be unmarried.

Demographic characteristics of women participating in PHASES.

PRAMS Maternal Attitudes Data

US Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring, 2009

By Health [source]

About this dataset

This dataset provides a fascinating glimpse into the attitudes and experiences of women before, during, and after pregnancy in the United States. Produced by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) as part of the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS), this population-based data contains insights into maternal abuse, alcohol use, contraception, breastfeeding habits, mental health issues, morbidity rates, obesity rates, preconception care patterns , pregnancy history data , prenatal care trends , sleep behaviors , smoke exposure rates , stress levels , tobacco use , WIC involvement Medicaid utilization infant health outcomes and unintended pregnancies. State health departments can use this information to devise strategies to improve the overall wellbeing of mothers and infants throughout all phases of prenatal care. Discover new perspectives on maternal habits while you explore this diverse set of columns including LocationAbbv., LocationDesc., Class., Topic,. Question., DataSource., Response,. DataValueUnit,, DataValueType,. FootnoteSymbol. DataValueStdErr., SampleSize,, BreakOut,,,, BreakOutCategory.. Geolocation. With annual updates available from PRAMS project as new results are available don't be out of the loop - dive in today!

More Datasets

For more datasets, click here.

Featured Notebooks

• 🚨 Your notebook can be here! 🚨!

How to use the dataset

This dataset contains population-based data on maternal attitudes and experiences before, during, and shortly after pregnancy in the US. It is provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). This dataset offers valuable insights into the individual experiences of mothers in the US, which could be used for a variety of purposes.

The PRAMS dataset contains data from 2009 onwards. The entries include year, location ID, location description, question type classabbreviation topicquestion response source unit value typevalue symbol standard error sample size break out category geolocation . In order to make better use of this dataset, it is important to understand how each entry relates to one another.

Year:The year indicates when the data was collected.

Location Abbr: This field provides an abbreviated region or state id where the data was collected.

Location Desc: The description provides a more detailed geographic area where the data was collected such as city or county that can help pinpoint more exact locations than a broad regional viewpoint provides.

Class : This is what PIDSS considers a “question type” and can range from asked directly to respondents or sentinel events often recorded within insurance claims-based datasets such as emergency room visits specific questions about smoking habits are also included in this section along with questions about family history as part of an overall health status assessment/risk categorization depiction done retrospectively on participants/respondents who already have experienced some level of health issue arising from their situation whether pre-pregnancy postpartum etc..

Topic : Each question references an umbrella topic so answers can be compared across various aspects related to difficulty experienced during pregnancy expectancy time frames protocols that should have been followed etc..

Question – Wordsmithing for clarity aims increase accuracy when deciphering causality links meaning by increasing terminology clarification which becomes essential when determining statistically significant correlations at different subgroups where appropriate additional information—including sensitivity may exist regarding certain politically or religiously charged topics answered within survey settings etc…

Data Source - These are static character strings HDDHCPPVPCDAODMBMTXNCVwhatever whichever methodology employed answer gathering-- telephone interviews focus groups electronic surveys abstractions from records found at provider lab radiology sites whatever descriptors saved intended capture magnitude relevant details having meaningful impact upon analysis discussions . . .also encompass elements incidenceprevalence cummulative extents seasonality temporal trends individual contributory factors identified linkages with confounders if any…..

Response

Research Ideas

• Analyzing trends in maternal attitudes and experiences among different states in the US to inform policy-making.
• Identifying associations between pregnancy health outcomes and specific behaviors, like alcohol consumption o...

This dataset assembles all final birth data for females aged 15–19, 15–17, and 18–19 for the United States.

This dataset includes birth rates for unmarried women by age group, race, and Hispanic origin in the United States since 1970.

Methods for collecting information on marital status changed over the reporting period and have been documented in:

• Ventura SJ, Bachrach CA. Nonmarital childbearing in the United States, 1940–99. National vital statistics reports; vol 48 no 16. Hyattsville, Maryland: National Center for Health Statistics. 2000. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr48/nvs48_16.pdf. • National Center for Health Statistics. User guide to the 2013 natality public use file. Hyattsville, Maryland: National Center for Health Statistics. 2014. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data_access/VitalStatsOnline.htm.

National data on births by Hispanics origin exclude data for Louisiana, New Hampshire, and Oklahoma in 1989; for New Hampshire and Oklahoma in 1990; for New Hampshire in 1991 and 1992. Information on reporting Hispanic origin is detailed in the Technical Appendix for the 1999 public-use natality data file (see (ftp://ftp.cdc.gov/pub/Health_Statistics/NCHS/Dataset_Documentation/DVS/natality/Nat1999doc.pdf.)

All birth data by race before 1980 are based on race of the child. Starting in 1980, birth data by race are based on race of the mother.

Cervical Cancer Risk Factors for Biopsy: This Dataset is Obtained from UCI Repository and kindly acknowledged!

This file contains a List of Risk Factors for Cervical Cancer leading to a Biopsy Examination!

About 11,000 new cases of invasive cervical cancer are diagnosed each year in the U.S. However, the number of new cervical cancer cases has been declining steadily over the past decades. Although it is the most preventable type of cancer, each year cervical cancer kills about 4,000 women in the U.S. and about 300,000 women worldwide. In the United States, cervical cancer mortality rates plunged by 74% from 1955 - 1992 thanks to increased screening and early detection with the Pap test. AGE Fifty percent of cervical cancer diagnoses occur in women ages 35 - 54, and about 20% occur in women over 65 years of age. The median age of diagnosis is 48 years. About 15% of women develop cervical cancer between the ages of 20 - 30. Cervical cancer is extremely rare in women younger than age 20. However, many young women become infected with multiple types of human papilloma virus, which then can increase their risk of getting cervical cancer in the future. Young women with early abnormal changes who do not have regular examinations are at high risk for localized cancer by the time they are age 40, and for invasive cancer by age 50. SOCIOECONOMIC AND ETHNIC FACTORS Although the rate of cervical cancer has declined among both Caucasian and African-American women over the past decades, it remains much more prevalent in African-Americans -- whose death rates are twice as high as Caucasian women. Hispanic American women have more than twice the risk of invasive cervical cancer as Caucasian women, also due to a lower rate of screening. These differences, however, are almost certainly due to social and economic differences. Numerous studies report that high poverty levels are linked with low screening rates. In addition, lack of health insurance, limited transportation, and language difficulties hinder a poor woman’s access to screening services. HIGH SEXUAL ACTIVITY Human papilloma virus (HPV) is the main risk factor for cervical cancer. In adults, the most important risk factor for HPV is sexual activity with an infected person. Women most at risk for cervical cancer are those with a history of multiple sexual partners, sexual intercourse at age 17 years or younger, or both. A woman who has never been sexually active has a very low risk for developing cervical cancer. Sexual activity with multiple partners increases the likelihood of many other sexually transmitted infections (chlamydia, gonorrhea, syphilis).Studies have found an association between chlamydia and cervical cancer risk, including the possibility that chlamydia may prolong HPV infection. FAMILY HISTORY Women have a higher risk of cervical cancer if they have a first-degree relative (mother, sister) who has had cervical cancer. USE OF ORAL CONTRACEPTIVES Studies have reported a strong association between cervical cancer and long-term use of oral contraception (OC). Women who take birth control pills for more than 5 - 10 years appear to have a much higher risk HPV infection (up to four times higher) than those who do not use OCs. (Women taking OCs for fewer than 5 years do not have a significantly higher risk.) The reasons for this risk from OC use are not entirely clear. Women who use OCs may be less likely to use a diaphragm, condoms, or other methods that offer some protection against sexual transmitted diseases, including HPV. Some research also suggests that the hormones in OCs might help the virus enter the genetic material of cervical cells. HAVING MANY CHILDREN Studies indicate that having many children increases the risk for developing cervical cancer, particularly in women infected with HPV. SMOKING Smoking is associated with a higher risk for precancerous changes (dysplasia) in the cervix and for progression to invasive cervical cancer, especially for women infected with HPV. IMMUNOSUPPRESSION Women with weak immune systems, (such as those with HIV / AIDS), are more susceptible to acquiring HPV. Immunocompromised patients are also at higher risk for having cervical precancer develop rapidly into invasive cancer. DIETHYLSTILBESTROL (DES) From 1938 - 1971, diethylstilbestrol (DES), an estrogen-related drug, was widely prescribed to pregnant women to help prevent miscarriages. The daughters of these women face a higher risk for cervical cancer. DES is no longer prsecribed.

The National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG) gathers information on family life, marriage and divorce, pregnancy, infertility, use of contraception, and men's and women's health. The survey results are used by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and others to plan health services and health education programs, and to do statistical studies of families, fertility, and health. Years included: 1973, 1976, 1982, 1988, 1995, 2002, 2006-2010; Data use agreement at time of file download:

This dataset includes birth rates for females by age group in the United States since 1940.

The number of states in the reporting area differ historically. In 1915 (when the birth registration area was established), 10 states and the District of Columbia reported births; by 1933, 48 states and the District of Columbia were reporting births, with the last two states, Alaska and Hawaii, added to the registration area in 1959 and 1960, when these regions gained statehood. Reporting area information is detailed in references 1 and 2 below. Trend lines for 1909–1958 are based on live births adjusted for under-registration; beginning with 1959, trend lines are based on registered live births.

This dataset includes teen birth rates for females by age group, race, and Hispanic origin in the United States since 1960.

Data availability varies by race and ethnicity groups. All birth data by race before 1980 are based on race of the child. Since 1980, birth data by race are based on race of the mother. For race, data are available for Black and White births since 1960, and for American Indians/Alaska Native and Asian/Pacific Islander births since 1980. Data on Hispanic origin are available since 1989. Teen birth rates for specific racial and ethnic categories are also available since 1989. From 2003 through 2015, the birth data by race were based on the “bridged” race categories (5). Starting in 2016, the race categories for reporting birth data changed; the new race and Hispanic origin categories are: Non-Hispanic, Single Race White; Non-Hispanic, Single Race Black; Non-Hispanic, Single Race American Indian/Alaska Native; Non-Hispanic, Single Race Asian; and, Non-Hispanic, Single Race Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander (5,6). Birth data by the prior, “bridged” race (and Hispanic origin) categories are included through 2018 for comparison.

National data on births by Hispanic origin exclude data for Louisiana, New Hampshire, and Oklahoma in 1989; New Hampshire and Oklahoma in 1990; and New Hampshire in 1991 and 1992. Birth and fertility rates for the Central and South American population includes other and unknown Hispanic. Information on reporting Hispanic origin is detailed in the Technical Appendix for the 1999 public-use natality data file (see ftp://ftp.cdc.gov/pub/Health_Statistics/NCHS/Dataset_Documentation/DVS/natality/Nat1999doc.pdf).