This data package includes the underlying data to replicate the charts, tables, and calculations presented in The US Revenue Implications of President Trump’s 2025 Tariffs, PIIE Briefing 25-2.

If you use the data, please cite as:

McKibbin, Warwick, and Geoffrey Shuetrim. 2025. The US Revenue Implications of President Trump’s 2025 Tariffs. PIIE Briefing 25-2. Washington: Peterson Institute for International Economics.

United States US: Share of Tariff Lines with Specific Rates: Primary Products data was reported at 2.760 % in 2016. This records a decrease from the previous number of 2.785 % for 2015. United States US: Share of Tariff Lines with Specific Rates: Primary Products data is updated yearly, averaging 2.713 % from Dec 1989 (Median) to 2016, with 27 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 3.650 % in 1993 and a record low of 0.023 % in 1997. United States US: Share of Tariff Lines with Specific Rates: Primary Products data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s USA – Table US.World Bank: Trade Tariffs. Share of tariff lines with specific rates is the share of lines in the tariff schedule that are set on a per unit basis or that combine ad valorem and per unit rates. It shows the extent to which countries use tariffs based on physical quantities or other, non-ad valorem measures. Primary products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 0-4 plus division 68 (nonferrous metals).; ; World Bank staff estimates using the World Integrated Trade Solution system, based on data from United Nations Conference on Trade and Development's Trade Analysis and Information System (TRAINS) database.; ;

NREL has assembled a list of U.S. retail electricity tariffs and their associated demand charge rates for the Commercial and Industrial sectors. The data was obtained from the Utility Rate Database. Keep the following information in mind when interpreting the data: (1) These data were interpreted and transcribed manually from utility tariff sheets, which are often complex. It is a certainty that these data contain errors, and therefore should only be used as a reference. Actual utility tariff sheets should be consulted if an action requires this type of data. (2) These data only contains tariffs that were entered into the Utility Rate Database. Since not all tariffs are designed in a format that can be entered into the Database, this list is incomplete - it does not contain all tariffs in the United States. (3) These data may have changed since this list was developed (4) Many of the underlying tariffs have additional restrictions or requirements that are not represented here. For example, they may only be available to the agricultural sector or closed to new customers. (5) If there are multiple demand charge elements in a given tariff, the maximum demand charge is the sum of each of the elements at any point in time. Where tiers were present, the highest rate tier was assumed. The value is a maximum for the year, and may be significantly different from demand charge rates at other times in the year. Utility Rate Database: https://openei.org/wiki/Utility_Rate_Database

This dataset is the current 2025 Harmonized Tariff Schedule plus all revisions for the current year. It provides the applicable tariff rates and statistical categories for all merchandise imported into the United States; it is based on the international Harmonized System, the global system of nomenclature that is used to describe most world trade in goods.

Imports in the United States decreased to 350.52 USD Billion in May from 350.83 USD Billion in April of 2025. This dataset provides the latest reported value for - United States Imports - plus previous releases, historical high and low, short-term forecast and long-term prediction, economic calendar, survey consensus and news.

The United States recorded a trade deficit of 71.52 USD Billion in May of 2025. This dataset provides the latest reported value for - United States Balance of Trade - plus previous releases, historical high and low, short-term forecast and long-term prediction, economic calendar, survey consensus and news.

United States US: Tariff Rate: Applied: Simple Mean: All Products data was reported at 2.870 % in 2016. This stayed constant from the previous number of 2.870 % for 2015. United States US: Tariff Rate: Applied: Simple Mean: All Products data is updated yearly, averaging 3.530 % from Dec 1989 (Median) to 2016, with 27 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 5.310 % in 1991 and a record low of 2.870 % in 2016. United States US: Tariff Rate: Applied: Simple Mean: All Products data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s United States – Table US.World Bank.WDI: Trade Tariffs. Simple mean applied tariff is the unweighted average of effectively applied rates for all products subject to tariffs calculated for all traded goods. Data are classified using the Harmonized System of trade at the six- or eight-digit level. Tariff line data were matched to Standard International Trade Classification (SITC) revision 3 codes to define commodity groups. Effectively applied tariff rates at the six- and eight-digit product level are averaged for products in each commodity group. When the effectively applied rate is unavailable, the most favored nation rate is used instead. To the extent possible, specific rates have been converted to their ad valorem equivalent rates and have been included in the calculation of simple mean tariffs.; ; World Bank staff estimates using the World Integrated Trade Solution system, based on data from United Nations Conference on Trade and Development's Trade Analysis and Information System (TRAINS) database and the World Trade Organization’s (WTO) Integrated Data Base (IDB) and Consolidated Tariff Schedules (CTS) database.; ;

This data package includes the underlying data files to replicate the data, tables, and charts presented in Why Trump’s tariff proposals would harm working Americans, PIIE Policy Brief 24-1.

If you use the data, please cite as: Clausing, Kimberly, and Mary E. Lovely. 2024. Why Trump’s tariff proposals would harm working Americans. PIIE Policy Brief 24-1. Washington, DC: Peterson Institute for International Economics.

This dataset is the current 2024 Harmonized Tariff Schedule plus all revisions for the current year. It provides the applicable tariff rates and statistical categories for all merchandise imported into the United States; it is based on the international Harmonized System, the global system of nomenclature that is used to describe most world trade in goods.

This dataset shows active grain (corn, soybeans, wheat, and sorghum) rail tariff rates to the Mexico border for a number of U.S. locations, border crossings, car types, and shipment sizes for BNSF, Union Pacific, and Kansas City Southern (KCS). These rates are Rule 11 rates, where a through rate from a U.S. origin to a Mexico destination is divided into a rate from a U.S. origin to the border and a rate from the border to a Mexico destination. The U.S. railroads began reporting only Rule 11 rates to the border in January 2022 following the implementation of a VAT tax on the Mexican portion of the rail shipment. This dataset only contains rates on the U.S. to-the-border portion of the shipment.

The rates are collected from the BNSF, UP, and KCS websites. The railroads do not update the tariffs on defined interval, but do typically have at least one update a year before that commodity's harvest season. The tariff rates are joined to fuel surcharges that are updated monthly. A row in the dataset represents the active tariff rate for that shipment type (route, size, etc.) and the fuel surcharge for that railroad in a particular month. In the case where a tariff rate is changed mid-month, the row is an average of any rates that were active during that month.

Fuel surcharges are published by the railroads on a monthly, per-mile basis and are collected separately from the tariff documents (See USDA's fuel surcharge data at https://agtransport.usda.gov/d/f883-g4tq). To compute a per car fuel surcharge, the U.S. origin to the border rail route distance is approximated using the Department of Transportation's National Rail Network Lines (NARL) dataset and a shortest-path computation.

KCS is now CPKC, but KCS rates are still reported separately at https://web.kcsouthern.com/AgricultureTariff/Default.aspx.

The dataset is intended to capture most of the published tariffs for corn, soybean, and wheat shipments to Mexico. However, some routes and tariff updates may not be included.

United States US: Tariff Rate: Most Favored Nation: Simple Mean: Primary Products data was reported at 3.020 % in 2016. This records an increase from the previous number of 2.990 % for 2015. United States US: Tariff Rate: Most Favored Nation: Simple Mean: Primary Products data is updated yearly, averaging 3.570 % from Dec 1989 (Median) to 2016, with 27 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 4.340 % in 1997 and a record low of 2.940 % in 2014. United States US: Tariff Rate: Most Favored Nation: Simple Mean: Primary Products data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s United States – Table US.World Bank.WDI: Trade Tariffs. Simple mean most favored nation tariff rate is the unweighted average of most favored nation rates for all products subject to tariffs calculated for all traded goods. Data are classified using the Harmonized System of trade at the six- or eight-digit level. Tariff line data were matched to Standard International Trade Classification (SITC) revision 3 codes to define commodity groups. Primary products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 0-4 plus division 68 (nonferrous metals).; ; World Bank staff estimates using the World Integrated Trade Solution system, based on data from United Nations Conference on Trade and Development's Trade Analysis and Information System (TRAINS) database and the World Trade Organization’s (WTO) Integrated Data Base (IDB) and Consolidated Tariff Schedules (CTS) database.; ;

This dataset is the current 2023 Harmonized Tariff Schedule plus all revisions for the current year. It provides the applicable tariff rates and statistical categories for all merchandise imported into the United States; it is based on the international Harmonized System, the global system of nomenclature that is used to describe most world trade in goods.

Statistics presented in this spreadsheet show by month the number of installations and capacity installed by technology type and tariff band that are confirmed on the Central Feed-in tariff Register (CFR) and eligible for FiT payments.

The Feed in Tarrif scheme closed to new entrants on 31 March 2019. As a result this is the last scheduled publication of this release.

For enquiries concerning this table email fitstatistics@beis.gov.uk

United States US: Tariff Rate: Applied: Weighted Mean: All Products data was reported at 1.670 % in 2016. This records a decrease from the previous number of 1.690 % for 2015. United States US: Tariff Rate: Applied: Weighted Mean: All Products data is updated yearly, averaging 1.960 % from Dec 1989 (Median) to 2016, with 27 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 3.950 % in 1992 and a record low of 1.540 % in 2007. United States US: Tariff Rate: Applied: Weighted Mean: All Products data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s United States – Table US.World Bank.WDI: Trade Tariffs. Weighted mean applied tariff is the average of effectively applied rates weighted by the product import shares corresponding to each partner country. Data are classified using the Harmonized System of trade at the six- or eight-digit level. Tariff line data were matched to Standard International Trade Classification (SITC) revision 3 codes to define commodity groups and import weights. To the extent possible, specific rates have been converted to their ad valorem equivalent rates and have been included in the calculation of weighted mean tariffs. Import weights were calculated using the United Nations Statistics Division's Commodity Trade (Comtrade) database. Effectively applied tariff rates at the six- and eight-digit product level are averaged for products in each commodity group. When the effectively applied rate is unavailable, the most favored nation rate is used instead.; ; World Bank staff estimates using the World Integrated Trade Solution system, based on data from United Nations Conference on Trade and Development's Trade Analysis and Information System (TRAINS) database and the World Trade Organization’s (WTO) Integrated Data Base (IDB) and Consolidated Tariff Schedules (CTS) database.; ;

How Tariffs Are Impacting the Economy

Tariffs on imported technology products, including hardware and software components critical for database security solutions, are impacting the economy by raising production and operational costs. These increased costs often cascade down to consumers and enterprises, resulting in higher prices for security solutions and services. Tariffs disrupt supply chains by causing delays and logistical challenges, further increasing expenses and slowing the deployment of essential security infrastructure.

➤ Discover how our research uncovers business opportunities @ https://market.us/report/database-security-market/free-sample/
(Use corporate mail ID for quicker response)

The uncertainty stemming from fluctuating trade policies causes companies to hesitate in committing to large-scale investments in cybersecurity. However, tariffs can also stimulate domestic manufacturing and software development, potentially reducing dependency on foreign suppliers and enhancing economic resilience. Over time, this shift could lead to increased innovation and job creation within local markets, balancing out short-term economic strains.

The FTA Tariff Rates API provides data about each country with whom the United States has a Free Trade Agreement (FTA). When the U.S. enters into an FTA with a foreign government, it negotiates lower tariff rates with that government for a wide variety of products. A tariff is a tax that a company must pay a foreign country when shipping a product to that country. Typically the FTA tariffs rates decline over several years.

Weekly barge rates in future months for downbound freight originating from seven locations along the Mississippi River System. This dataset shows rates for transactions three months in the future.

The U.S. Inland Waterway System utilizes a percent-of-tariff system to establish barge freight rates. The tariffs were originally from the Bulk Grain and Grain Products Freight Tariff No. 7, which were issued by the Waterways Freight Bureau (WFB) of the Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC). In 1976, the United States Department of Justice entered into an agreement with the ICC and made Tariff No. 7 no longer applicable. Today, the WFB no longer exists, and the ICC has become the Surface Transportation Board, which does not have jurisdiction over barge rates on the inland waterways. However, the barge industry continues to use the tariffs as benchmarks for rate units.

Each city on the river has its own benchmark, with the northern most cities having the highest benchmarks. They are as follows: Twin Cities = 619; Mid-Mississippi = 532; St. Louis = 399; Illinois = 464; Cincinnati = 469; Lower Ohio = 446; and Cairo-Memphis = 314.

To calculate the rate in dollars per ton, multiply the percent of tariff rate by the 1976 benchmark and divide by 100: (Rate * 1976 tariff benchmark rate per ton)/100. As an example, a 271 percent tariff for a St. Louis grain barge would equal 271 percent of the St. Louis benchmark rate of $3.99, or $10.81 per ton.

The United States' total Exports in 2024 were valued at US$2.06 Trillion, according to the United Nations COMTRADE database on international trade. The United States' main export partners were: Canada, Mexico and China. The top three export commodities were: Mineral fuels, oils, distillation products; Machinery, nuclear reactors, boilers and Electrical, electronic equipment. Total Imports were valued at US$3.36 Trillion. In 2024, The United States had a trade deficit of US$1.29 Trillion.