Context

Microsoft is an American company that develops and distributes software and services such as: a search engine (Bing), cloud solutions and the computer operating system Windows.

Market cap

Market capitalization of Microsoft (MSFT)

Market cap: $3.085 Trillion USD

As of February 2025 Microsoft has a market cap of $3.085 Trillion USD. This makes Microsoft the world's 2nd most valuable company by market cap according to our data. The market capitalization, commonly called market cap, is the total market value of a publicly traded company's outstanding shares and is commonly used to measure how much a company is worth.

Revenue

Revenue for Microsoft (MSFT)
Revenue in 2024 (TTM): $254.19 Billion USD

According to Microsoft's latest financial reports the company's current revenue (TTM ) is $254.19 Billion USD. In 2023 the company made a revenue of $227.58 Billion USD an increase over the revenue in the year 2022 that were of $204.09 Billion USD. The revenue is the total amount of income that a company generates by the sale of goods or services. Unlike with the earnings no expenses are subtracted.

Earnings

Earnings for Microsoft (MSFT)
Earnings in 2024 (TTM): $110.77 Billion USD

According to Microsoft's latest financial reports the company's current earnings are $254.19 Billion USD. In 2023 the company made an earning of $101.21 Billion USD, an increase over its 2022 earnings that were of $82.58 Billion USD. The earnings displayed on this page are the earnings before interest and taxes or simply EBIT.

End of Day market cap according to different sources On Feb 2nd, 2025 the market cap of Microsoft was reported to be:

• $3.085 Trillion USD by Nasdaq

• $3.085 Trillion USD by CompaniesMarketCap

• $3.085 Trillion USD by Yahoo Finance

Content

Geography: USA

Time period: March 1986- February 2025

Unit of analysis: Microsoft Stock Data 2025

Variables

Acknowledgements

This dataset belongs to me. I’m sharing it here for free. You may do with it as you wish.

https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/kaggle-user-content/o/inbox%2F18335022%2F0304ad0416e7e55515daf890288d7f7f%2FScreenshot%202025-02-03%20152019.png?generation=1738662588735376&alt=media" alt="">

https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/kaggle-user-content/o/inbox%2F18335022%2Fba7629dd0c4dc3e2ea1dbac361b94de1%2FScreenshot%202025-02-03%20152147.png?generation=1738662611945343&alt=media" alt="">

https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/kaggle-user-content/o/inbox%2F18335022%2Fa9f48f1ec5fdf2a363a138389294d5b0%2FScreenshot%202025-02-03%20152159.png?generation=1738662631268574&alt=media" alt="">

The latest closing stock price for Microsoft as of June 18, 2025 is 480.24. An investor who bought $1,000 worth of Microsoft stock at the IPO in 1986 would have $8,056,718 today, roughly 8,057 times their original investment - a 25.94% compound annual growth rate over 39 years. The all-time high Microsoft stock closing price was 480.24 on June 18, 2025. The Microsoft 52-week high stock price is 481.00, which is 0.2% above the current share price. The Microsoft 52-week low stock price is 344.79, which is 28.2% below the current share price. The average Microsoft stock price for the last 52 weeks is 422.77. For more information on how our historical price data is adjusted see the Stock Price Adjustment Guide.

Microsoft's global revenue grew from fiscal year 2022 to 2024, increasing by about ***** percent year-on-year and reaching over *** billion U.S. dollars. This marks another record-setting year for the software giant in terms of sales revenue. Microsoft and Bill Gates Microsoft has become a constant figure among the world’s most valuable brands. Its founder Bill Gates is presently, and perhaps unsurprisingly, one of the richest men in the United States and among the richest billionaires worldwide, among other well-known figures such as Warren Buffet, Carlos Slim Helu, and Larry Ellison. In addition to his status as an entrepreneur, Bill Gates is also known for his philanthropy. In 2000, together with his wife, they created the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. The foundation has donated a considerable amount of money, in particular in the area of research and development of treatments for neglected diseases. While Bill Gates no longer heads the Microsoft Corporation, the company itself continues to show strong results around the world, with versions of its most well-known product, the Windows operating system, consistently leading the home operating system market. The Microsoft Office suite also remains the most widely used office software around the world, with few comparable competitors in sight. The fiscal year-end of the company is June, 30th.

Hyperscale data center industry revenue has skyrocketed over the past five years, driven by the proliferation of cloud computing and the Internet of Things (IoT), which require scalable data solutions. Demand has continued to grow following the emergence and adoption of AI across the US economy, driving major tech companies like Microsoft, AWS and Google to make significant investments in their infrastructure. As a result, industry revenue has surged at a CAGR of 13.1% over the past five years to reach $111.2 billion in 2025, growing 8.6% during the year alone. The industry has recently employed more diverse pricing models beyond on-demand structures. Models such as reserved instances and spot pricing have increased in popularity, offering flexibility to meet varied customer needs. However, as demand for industry services has risen, so have utility and power costs, which now account for a significant portion of the industry's cost structure. With AI stretching the limits of current facilities, providers have begun to construct new and more efficient locations that can meet the modern needs of customers. Providers have been able to navigate these investments through financing debt and raising capital, though profit growth has still been impacted by these reinvestments. Providers will continue to allocate a significant portion of their capital expenditures toward AI data centers. As downstream needs evolve, data center companies will also invest in new offerings, such as edge computing, which is expected to strengthen in popularity over the next five years and contribute toward growth. Power supply and cybersecurity concerns will represent notable challenges that the industry will face; however, compliance will come into greater focus as regulations catch up to recent innovations. Though growth will be limited by technological limitations, industry revenue is still expected to grow at a CAGR of 8.2% over the next five years, reaching $165.1 billion in 2030.

General descriptionThis dataset contains some markers of Open Science in the publications of the Chemical Biology Consortium Sweden (CBCS) between 2010 and July 2023. The sample of CBCS publications during this period consists of 188 articles. Every publication was visited manually at its DOI URL to answer the following questions.1. Is the research article an Open Access publication?2. Does the research article have a Creative Common license or a similar license?3. Does the research article contain a data availability statement?4. Did the authors submit data of their study to a repository such as EMBL, Genbank, Protein Data Bank PDB, Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre CCDC, Dryad or a similar repository?5. Does the research article contain supplementary data?6. Do the supplementary data have a persistent identifier that makes them citable as a defined research output?VariablesThe data were compiled in a Microsoft Excel 365 document that includes the following variables.1. DOI URL of research article2. Year of publication3. Research article published with Open Access4. License for research article5. Data availability statement in article6. Supplementary data added to article7. Persistent identifier for supplementary data8. Authors submitted data to NCBI or EMBL or PDB or Dryad or CCDCVisualizationParts of the data were visualized in two figures as bar diagrams using Microsoft Excel 365. The first figure displays the number of publications during a year, the number of publications that is published with open access and the number of publications that contain a data availability statement (Figure 1). The second figure shows the number of publication sper year and how many publications contain supplementary data. This figure also shows how many of the supplementary datasets have a persistent identifier (Figure 2).File formats and softwareThe file formats used in this dataset are:.csv (Text file).docx (Microsoft Word 365 file).jpg (JPEG image file).pdf/A (Portable Document Format for archiving).png (Portable Network Graphics image file).pptx (Microsoft Power Point 365 file).txt (Text file).xlsx (Microsoft Excel 365 file)All files can be opened with Microsoft Office 365 and work likely also with the older versions Office 2019 and 2016. MD5 checksumsHere is a list of all files of this dataset and of their MD5 checksums.1. Readme.txt (MD5: 795f171be340c13d78ba8608dafb3e76)2. Manifest.txt (MD5: 46787888019a87bb9d897effdf719b71)3. Materials_and_methods.docx (MD5: 0eedaebf5c88982896bd1e0fe57849c2),4. Materials_and_methods.pdf (MD5: d314bf2bdff866f827741d7a746f063b),5. Materials_and_methods.txt (MD5: 26e7319de89285fc5c1a503d0b01d08a),6. CBCS_publications_until_date_2023_07_05.xlsx (MD5: 532fec0bd177844ac0410b98de13ca7c),7. CBCS_publications_until_date_2023_07_05.csv (MD5: 2580410623f79959c488fdfefe8b4c7b),8. Data_from_CBCS_publications_until_date_2023_07_05_obtained_by_manual_collection.xlsx (MD5: 9c67dd84a6b56a45e1f50a28419930e5),9. Data_from_CBCS_publications_until_date_2023_07_05_obtained_by_manual_collection.csv (MD5: fb3ac69476bfc57a8adc734b4d48ea2b),10. Aggregated_data_from_CBCS_publications_until_2023_07_05.xlsx (MD5: 6b6cbf3b9617fa8960ff15834869f793),11. Aggregated_data_from_CBCS_publications_until_2023_07_05.csv (MD5: b2b8dd36ba86629ed455ae5ad2489d6e),12. Figure_1_CBCS_publications_until_2023_07_05_Open_Access_and_data_availablitiy_statement.xlsx (MD5: 9c0422cf1bbd63ac0709324cb128410e),13. Figure_1.pptx (MD5: 55a1d12b2a9a81dca4bb7f333002f7fe),14. Image_of_figure_1.jpg (MD5: 5179f69297fbbf2eaaf7b641784617d7),15. Image_of_figure_1.png (MD5: 8ec94efc07417d69115200529b359698),16. Figure_2_CBCS_publications_until_2023_07_05_supplementary_data_and_PID_for_supplementary_data.xlsx (MD5: f5f0d6e4218e390169c7409870227a0a),17. Figure_2.pptx (MD5: 0fd4c622dc0474549df88cf37d0e9d72),18. Image_of_figure_2.jpg (MD5: c6c68b63b7320597b239316a1c15e00d),19. Image_of_figure_2.png (MD5: 24413cc7d292f468bec0ac60cbaa7809)

What is IPGOD?\r

The Intellectual Property Government Open Data (IPGOD) includes over 100 years of registry data on all intellectual property (IP) rights administered by IP Australia. It also has derived information about the applicants who filed these IP rights, to allow for research and analysis at the regional, business and individual level. This is the 2019 release of IPGOD.\r \r \r

How do I use IPGOD?\r

IPGOD is large, with millions of data points across up to 40 tables, making them too large to open with Microsoft Excel. Furthermore, analysis often requires information from separate tables which would need specialised software for merging. We recommend that advanced users interact with the IPGOD data using the right tools with enough memory and compute power. This includes a wide range of programming and statistical software such as Tableau, Power BI, Stata, SAS, R, Python, and Scalar.\r \r \r

IP Data Platform\r

IP Australia is also providing free trials to a cloud-based analytics platform with the capabilities to enable working with large intellectual property datasets, such as the IPGOD, through the web browser, without any installation of software. IP Data Platform\r \r

References\r

\r The following pages can help you gain the understanding of the intellectual property administration and processes in Australia to help your analysis on the dataset.\r \r * Patents\r * Trade Marks\r * Designs\r * Plant Breeder’s Rights\r \r \r

Updates\r

\r

Tables and columns\r

\r Due to the changes in our systems, some tables have been affected.\r \r * We have added IPGOD 225 and IPGOD 325 to the dataset!\r * The IPGOD 206 table is not available this year.\r * Many tables have been re-built, and as a result may have different columns or different possible values. Please check the data dictionary for each table before use.\r \r

Data quality improvements\r

\r Data quality has been improved across all tables.\r \r * Null values are simply empty rather than '31/12/9999'.\r * All date columns are now in ISO format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.\r * All indicator columns have been converted to Boolean data type (True/False) rather than Yes/No, Y/N, or 1/0.\r * All tables are encoded in UTF-8.\r * All tables use the backslash \ as the escape character.\r * The applicant name cleaning and matching algorithms have been updated. We believe that this year's method improves the accuracy of the matches. Please note that the "ipa_id" generated in IPGOD 2019 will not match with those in previous releases of IPGOD.

The Data Processing and Hosting Services industry has transformed in recent years, with the growth of cloud computing creating new markets. The need for cloud computing has surged thanks to increased demand from banks and a rising number of mobile connections. Many companies think of cloud computing as an innovative way to reduce operating costs thanks to its scalable resource allocation and minimised need for physical infrastructure, which has led to the introduction of new services that make data sharing more efficient. However, cloud technology typically generates lower revenue than traditional methods of on-premises data storage and server hosting, which has constrained revenue growth. Over the five years through 2024-25, revenue is expected to edge up at a compound annual rate of 2.2% to reach £9.9 billion. Profit has improved as IT adoption has climbed, expand the industry’s potential market. The industry has consistently expanded, driven by the rapid adoption of cloud computing and hybrid work models. Platforms like Microsoft Teams and Zoom have become indispensable as companies have pivoted to digital environments, needing robust, low-latency hosting solutions. The industry's ability to adapt and support video conferencing platforms has garnered steady revenue growth. Compounding this, UK businesses are increasingly embracing cloud-based solutions for complex applications, further elevating demand. Fuelled by the economy digital transformation, burgeoning e-commerce, cloud migration and rising demand for robust data handling needs from AI, machine learning and cybersecurity, revenue is projected to climb by 2.2% in 2024-25. Revenue will continue to swell as businesses incorporate data technology into their operations. Competitive pressures will continue to shape market dynamics, with smaller companies leveraging cloud advancements to offer niche, cost-effective solutions. Legislative developments like the Data (Use and Access) Bill could reshape the competitive landscape, reducing costs and invigorating revenue by fostering a more business-friendly environment. Although concerns regarding the security of cloud data storage may limit the industry's growth potential, the continued development of cloud computing should continue to push up revenue moving forward. Revenue is projected to jump at a compound annual rate of 2.1% over the five years through 2029-30 to £11 billion. Nevertheless, companies will have to navigate external pressures, including global competition and workforce challenges.

The Data Processing and Hosting Services industry has transformed over the past decade, with the growth of cloud computing creating new markets. Demand surged in line with heightened demand from banks and a rising number of mobile connections across Europe. Many companies regard cloud computing as an innovative way of reducing their operating costs, which has led to the introduction of new services that make the sharing of data more efficient. Over the five years through 2025, revenue is expected to hike at a compound annual rate of 4.3% to €113.5 billion, including a 5.6% jump in 2025. Industry profit has been constrained by pricing pressures between companies and regions. Investments in new-generation data centres, especially in digital hubs like Frankfurt, London, and Paris, have consistently outpaced available supply, underlining the continent’s insatiable appetite for processing power. Meanwhile, 5G network roll-outs and heightened consumer expectations for real-time digital services have made agile hosting and robust cloud infrastructure imperative, pushing providers to invest in both core and edge data solutions. Robust growth has been fuelled by rapid digitalisation, widespread cloud adoption, and exploding demand from sectors such as e-commerce and streaming. Scaling cloud infrastructure, driven by both established giants, like Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft Azure and Google Cloud and nimble local entrants, has allowed the industry to keep pace with unpredictable spikes in online activity and increasingly complex data needs. Rising investment in data centre capacity and the proliferation of high-availability hosting have significantly boosted operational efficiency and market competitiveness, with revenue growth closely tracking the boom in cloud and streaming services across the continent. Industry revenue is set to grow moving forward as European businesses incorporate data technology into their operations. Revenue is projected to boom, growing at a compound annual rate of 10.3% over the five years through 2030, to reach €185.4 billion. Growth is likely to be assisted by ongoing cloud adoption, accelerated 5G expansion, and soaring investor interest in hyperscale and sovereign data centres. Technical diversification seen in hybrid cloud solutions, edge computing deployments, and sovereign clouds, will create significant opportunities for incumbents and disruptors alike. Pricing pressures, intensified by global hyperscalers’ economies of scale and assertive licensing strategies, will pressurise profit, especially for smaller participants confronting rising capital expenditure and compliance costs.

• This is the Historical Stock Market Data of five major Big Tech companies: NVIDIA (NVDA), Apple (AAPL), Microsoft (MSFT), Google (GOOGL), and Amazon (AMZN) over a 15 years from January 1, 2010 to January 1, 2025.
• It includes daily stock data with opening and closing prices, highs, lows and trading volume.
• This dataset serves as a valuable resource for analyzing long term growth trends, volatility and market behavior of leading tech giants.
• By analyzing this dataset, we can gain a deeper understanding of NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, GOOGL, and AMZN's historical stock behavior over 15 years and make predictions about their future performance.

Columns Description:

1. Date: The trading date of the stock data entry.
2. Close_AAPL: Apple’s stock price at market close at the end of the trading days.
3. Close_AMZN: Amazon’s stock price at market close at the end of the trading days.
4. Close_GOOGL: Google’s stock price at market close at the end of the trading days.
5. Close_MSFT: Microsoft’s stock price at the end of the trading days.
6. Close_NVDA: NVIDIA’s stock price at the end of the trading days.
7. High_AAPL: The highest price of Apple’s stock reached during the trading days.
8. High_AMZN: The highest price of Amazon’s stock reached during the trading days.
9. High_GOOGL: The highest price of Google’s stock reached during the trading days.
10. High_MSFT: The highest price of Microsoft’s stock reached during the trading days.
11. High_NVDA: The highest price of NVIDIA’s stock reached during the trading days.
12. Low_AAPL: The lowest price of Apple’s stock reached during the trading days.
13. Low_AMZN: The lowest price of Amazon’s stock reached during the trading days.
14. Low_GOOGL: The lowest price of Google’s stock reached during the trading days.
15. Low_MSFT: The lowest price of Microsoft’s stock reached during the trading days.
16. Low_NVDA: The lowest price NVIDIA’s stock reached during the trading days.
17. Open_AAPL: Apple’s opening stock price at the beginning of the trading days.
18. Open_AMZN: Amazon’s opening stock price at the beginning of the trading days.
19. Open_GOOGL: Google’s opening stock price at the beginning of the trading days.
20. Open_MSFT: Microsoft’s opening stock price at the beginning of the trading days.
21. Open_NVDA: NVIDIA’s opening stock price at the beginning of the trading days.
22. Volume_AAPL: The number of shares traded of Apple’s stock during the trading days.
23. Volume_AMZN: The number of shares traded of Amazon’s stock during the trading days.
24. Volume_GOOGL: The number of shares traded of Google’s stock during the trading days.
25. Volume_MSFT: The number of shares traded of Microsoft’s stock during the trading days.
26. Volume_NVDA: The number of shares traded of NVIDIA’s stock during the trading days.

Usefulness of Data:

1. Trend Analysis: This dataset can be used for the analysis of long term stock price trends for major 5 tech companies. By analyzing this dataset and taking deep insights about the data and stock patterns over 15 years, investors can identify potential opportunities.
2. Volatility and Risk Assessment: The data helps to assess the volatility of 5 big tech companies' stocks by comparing highs and lows and provides the management strategies to the investors.
3. Predictive Modeling: With stock prices, this dataset can be used for developing predictive models such as forecasting future stock prices using techniques such as ARIMA, SARIMAX, or Deep Learning Models.
4. Comparative Analysis: By analyzing this Dataset, researchers and analysts can compare the performance of NVIDIA, Apple, Microsoft, Google, and Amazon over 15 years, which helps to identify trends in the stock market and relative growth between these companies.
5. Market Behavior Understanding: By analyzing how each stock reacts to major market events (e.g., earnings reports & macroeconomic changes, etc.), we can understand the companies' growth & patterns.

https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/kaggle-user-content/o/inbox%2F17226110%2Fb9d7d8fe0c03086606ebbd7e2e2db04d%2FSock%20Market%20Image.png?generation=1745136427757536&alt=media" alt="">

Microsoft 365 is used by over * million companies worldwide, with over *** million customers in the United States alone using the office suite software. Office 365 is the brand name previously used by Microsoft for a group of software applications providing productivity related services to its subscribers. Office 365 applications include Outlook, OneDrive, Word, Excel, PowerPoint, OneNote, SharePoint and Microsoft Teams. The consumer and small business plans of Office 365 were renamed as Microsoft 365 on 21 April, 2020. Global office suite market share  An office suite is a collection of software applications (word processing, spreadsheets, database etc.) designed to be used for tasks within an organization. Worldwide market share of office suite technologies is split between Google’s G Suite and Microsoft’s Office 365, with G Suite controlling around ** percent of the global market and Office 365 holding around ** percent. This trend is similar across most worldwide regions.

The Data Monetization Market size was valued at USD 4.05 billion in 2023 and is projected to reach USD 20.19 billion by 2032, exhibiting a CAGR of 25.8 % during the forecasts period. The data monetization market refers to the actual steps of taking large amounts of unstructured data and transforming them into income-earning products or new business models. Businesses collect data, process and monetize them as information that they are able to sell them to other businesses or use it for the organization’s benefit such as running operations efficiently, making better decisions and making clients’ experiences better. Some of the uses include; selling the compiled consumer data to marketers, providing data services such as predeterminant analysis and letting out copyright consumer data to research firms. The concepts of its use are versatile and can be applied to retail sales, finance, health care, telecommunications, and others. Some important trends of data management are the use of big data and artificial intelligence and machine learning for analysis, burgeoning use of data markets, and legal changes related to data protection and data ownership. Since data is gaining more currency in the management of organizations, the organizations are now employing intelligent technologies and techniques to monetize on the data resources that are available to bring competitive advantage. Recent developments include: In February 2024, Gulp Data announced a partnership with Snowflake that enables organizations to explore, share, and unlock value from their data, providing data valuation, data-backed loans, and data monetization services. , In December 2023, Thales completed the acquisition of Imperva. By providing the most comprehensive solutions for the broadest range of application, data security, and identity use cases, Thales and Imperva will help customers address cybersecurity challenges that are increasing rapidly in frequency, severity, and complexity. , In September 2022, SAS declared SAS Viya on Azure as a powerful data analytics platform available on the Microsoft Azure marketplace. This new offering makes it easier than ever for businesses to gain insights from their data by combining the scalability and flexibility of Azure with the power of SAS Viya. , In March 2022, Domo, Inc. announced Data Apps, a new low-code data tool designed to make data-driven decisions and actions accessible to everyone in an organization. It makes Data Apps more accessible to a wider range of users than traditional BI tools, often specifically designed for executives, managers, and data analysts. , In January 2022, Revelate Data Monetization Corp. formerly known as TickSmith announced a $20 million Series, a funding investment to promote its innovative data-selling platform. Unlike any other product now available, its data web store is a B2B SaaS platform offering an e-commerce data shopping experience by offering all the tools required to prepare, manage, package, and monetize data. .

To create the dataset, the top 10 countries leading in the incidence of COVID-19 in the world were selected as of October 22, 2020 (on the eve of the second full of pandemics), which are presented in the Global 500 ranking for 2020: USA, India, Brazil, Russia, Spain, France and Mexico. For each of these countries, no more than 10 of the largest transnational corporations included in the Global 500 rating for 2020 and 2019 were selected separately. The arithmetic averages were calculated and the change (increase) in indicators such as profitability and profitability of enterprises, their ranking position (competitiveness), asset value and number of employees. The arithmetic mean values of these indicators for all countries of the sample were found, characterizing the situation in international entrepreneurship as a whole in the context of the COVID-19 crisis in 2020 on the eve of the second wave of the pandemic. The data is collected in a general Microsoft Excel table. Dataset is a unique database that combines COVID-19 statistics and entrepreneurship statistics. The dataset is flexible data that can be supplemented with data from other countries and newer statistics on the COVID-19 pandemic. Due to the fact that the data in the dataset are not ready-made numbers, but formulas, when adding and / or changing the values in the original table at the beginning of the dataset, most of the subsequent tables will be automatically recalculated and the graphs will be updated. This allows the dataset to be used not just as an array of data, but as an analytical tool for automating scientific research on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and crisis on international entrepreneurship. The dataset includes not only tabular data, but also charts that provide data visualization. The dataset contains not only actual, but also forecast data on morbidity and mortality from COVID-19 for the period of the second wave of the pandemic in 2020. The forecasts are presented in the form of a normal distribution of predicted values and the probability of their occurrence in practice. This allows for a broad scenario analysis of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and crisis on international entrepreneurship, substituting various predicted morbidity and mortality rates in risk assessment tables and obtaining automatically calculated consequences (changes) on the characteristics of international entrepreneurship. It is also possible to substitute the actual values identified in the process and following the results of the second wave of the pandemic to check the reliability of pre-made forecasts and conduct a plan-fact analysis. The dataset contains not only the numerical values of the initial and predicted values of the set of studied indicators, but also their qualitative interpretation, reflecting the presence and level of risks of a pandemic and COVID-19 crisis for international entrepreneurship.

Object recognition predominately still relies on many high-quality training examples per object category. In contrast, learning new objects from only a few examples could enable many impactful applications from robotics to user personalization. Most few-shot learning research, however, has been driven by benchmark datasets that lack the high variation that these applications will face when deployed in the real-world. To close this gap, we present the ORBIT dataset, grounded in a real-world application of teachable object recognizers for people who are blind/low vision. We provide a full, unfiltered dataset of 4,733 videos of 588 objects recorded by 97 people who are blind/low-vision on their mobile phones, and a benchmark dataset of 3,822 videos of 486 objects collected by 77 collectors. The code for loading the dataset, computing all benchmark metrics, and running the baseline models is available at https://github.com/microsoft/ORBIT-DatasetThis version comprises several zip files:- train, validation, test: benchmark dataset, organised by collector, with raw videos split into static individual frames in jpg format at 30FPS- other: data not in the benchmark set, organised by collector, with raw videos split into static individual frames in jpg format at 30FPS (please note that the train, validation, test, and other files make up the unfiltered dataset)- *_224: as for the benchmark, but static individual frames are scaled down to 224 pixels.- *_unfiltered_videos: full unfiltered dataset, organised by collector, in mp4 format.

Microsoft Common Objects in Context (COCO) Dataset

The Common Objects in Context (COCO) dataset is a widely recognized collection designed to spur object detection, segmentation, and captioning research. Created by Microsoft, COCO provides annotations, including object categories, keypoints, and more. The model it a valuable asset for machine learning practitioners and researchers. Today, many model architectures are benchmarked against COCO, which has enabled a standard system by which architectures can be compared.

While COCO is often touted to comprise over 300k images, it's pivotal to understand that this number includes diverse formats like keypoints, among others. Specifically, the labeled dataset for object detection stands at 123,272 images.

The full object detection labeled dataset is made available here, ensuring researchers have access to the most comprehensive data for their experiments. With that said, COCO has not released their test set annotations, meaning the test data doesn't come with labels. Thus, this data is not included in the dataset.

The Roboflow team has worked extensively with COCO. Here are a few links that may be helpful as you get started working with this dataset:

• An introduction to the COCO dataset
• Weird images in COCO, and what that tells us about the utility and limits of COCO

Research in information science and scholarly communication strongly relies on the availability of openly accessible datasets of metadata and, where possible, their relative payloads. To this end, CrossRef plays a pivotal role by providing free access to its entire metadata collection, and allowing other initiatives to link and enrich its information. Therefore, a number of key pieces of information result scattered across diverse datasets and resources freely available online. As a result of this fragmentation, researchers in this domain end up struggling with daily integration problems producing a plethora of ad-hoc datasets, therefore incurring in a waste of time, resources, and infringing open science best practices.

The latest DOIBoost release is a metadata collection that enriches CrossRef (October 2019 release: 108,048,986 publication records) with inputs from Microsoft Academic Graph (October 2019 release: 76,171,072 publication records), ORCID (October 2019 release: 12,642,131 publication records), and Unpaywall (August 2019 release: 26,589,869 publication records) for the purpose of supporting high-quality and robust research experiments. As a result of DOIBoost, CrossRef records have been "boosted" as follows:

• 47,254,618 CrossRef records have been enriched with an abstract from MAG;
• 33,279,428 CrossRef records have been enriched with an affiliation from MAG and/or ORCID;
• 509,588 CrossRef records have been enriched with an ORCID identifier from ORCID.

This entry consists of two files: doiboost_dump-2019-11-27.tar (contains a set of partXYZ.gz files, each one containing the JSON files relative to the enriched CrossRef records), a schemaAndSample.zip, and termsOfUse.doc (contains details on the terms of use of DOIBoost).

Note that this records comes with two relationships to other results of this experiment:

1. link to the data paper: for more information on how the dataset is (and can be) generated;
2. link to the software: to repeat the experiment

Summer Steelhead Distribution October 2009 Version This dataset depicts observation-based stream-level geographic distribution of anadromous summer-run steelhead trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss irideus (O. mykiss), in California. It was developed for the express purpose of assisting with steelhead recovery planning efforts. The distributions reported in this dataset were derived from a subset of the data contained in the Aquatic Species Observation Database (ASOD), a Microsoft Access multi-species observation data capture application. ASOD is an ongoing project designed to capture as complete a set of statewide inland aquatic vertebrate species observation information as possible. Please note: A separate distribution is available for winter-run steelhead. Contact information is the same as for the above. ASOD Observation data were used to develop a network of stream segments. These lines are developed by "tracing down" from each observation to the sea using the flow properties of USGS National Hydrography Dataset (NHD) High Resolution hydrography. Lastly these lines, representing stream segments, were assigned a value of either Anad Present (Anadromous present). The end result (i.e., this layer) consists of a set of lines representing the distribution of steelhead based on observations in the Aquatic Species Observation Database. This dataset represents stream reaches that are known or believed to be used by steelhead based on steelhead observations. Thus, it contains only positive steelhead occurrences. The absence of distribution on a stream does not necessarily indicate that steelhead do not utilize that stream. Additionally, steelhead may not be found in all streams or reaches each year. This is due to natural variations in run size, water conditions, and other environmental factors. The information in this data set should be used as an indicator of steelhead presence/suspected presence at the time of the observation as indicated by the 'Late_Yr' (Latest Year) field attribute. The line features in the dataset may not represent the maximum extent of steelhead on a stream; rather it is important to note that this distribution most likely underestimates the actual distribution of steelhead. This distribution is based on observations found in the ASOD database. The individual observations may not have occurred at the upper extent of anadromous occupation. In addition, no attempt was made to capture every observation of O. mykiss and so it should not be assumed that this dataset is complete for each stream. The distribution dataset was built solely from the ASOD observational data. No additional data (habitat mapping, barriers data, gradient modeling, etc.) were utilized to either add to or validate the data. It is very possible that an anadromous observation in this dataset has been recorded above (upstream of) a barrier as identified in the Passage Assessment Database (PAD). In the near future, we hope to perform a comparative analysis between this dataset and the PAD to identify and resolve all such discrepancies. Such an analysis will add rigor to and help validate both datasets. This dataset has recently undergone a review. Data source contributors as well as CDFG fisheries biologists have been provided the opportunity to review and suggest edits or additions during a recent review. Data contributors were notified and invited to review and comment on the handling of the information that they provided. The distribution was then posted to an intranet mapping application and CDFG biologists were provided an opportunity to review and comment on the dataset. During this review, biologists were also encouraged to add new observation data. This resulting final distribution contains their suggestions and additions. Please refer to "Use Constraints" section below.

This dataset is about books. It has 2 rows and is filtered where the book is Windows of opportunity : how nations make wealth. It features 7 columns including author, publication date, language, and book publisher.

According to Cognitive Market Research, the global Business Intelligence market size is USD 16.9 million in 2023 and will expand at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 9.50% from 2023 to 2030.

The demand for Business Intelligence s is rising due to the increasing data complexity and rising focus on data-driven decision-making.
Demand for adults remains higher in the Business Intelligence market.
The Business intelligence platform category held the highest Business intelligence market revenue share in 2023.
North American Business Intelligence will continue to lead, whereas the Asia-Pacific Business Intelligence market will experience the most substantial growth until 2030.

Growing Emphasis on Data-Driven Decision-Making to Provide Viable Market Output

In the Business Intelligence Tools market, the increasing recognition of the strategic importance of data-driven decision-making serves as a primary driver. Organizations across various industries are realizing the transformative power of insights derived from BI tools. As the volume of data generated continues to soar, businesses seek sophisticated tools that can efficiently analyze and interpret this information. The ability of BI tools to convert raw data into actionable insights empowers decision-makers to formulate informed strategies, enhance operational efficiency, and gain a competitive edge in a data-centric business landscape.

In June 2020, SAS and Microsoft established a comprehensive technology and go-to-market strategic alliance. As part of the collaboration, SAS's industry solutions and analytical products will be moved to Microsoft Azure, SAS Cloud's preferred cloud provider.

Source-news.microsoft.com/2020/06/15/sas-and-microsoft-partner-to-further-shape-the-future-of-analytics-and-ai/#:~:text=and%20SAS%20today%20announced%20an,from%20their%20digital%20transformation%20initiatives.

Rise in Adoption of Advanced Analytics and Artificial Intelligence to Propel Market Growth

Another significant driver in the Business Intelligence Tools market is the escalating adoption of advanced analytics and artificial intelligence (AI) capabilities. Modern BI tools are incorporating AI-driven functionalities such as machine learning algorithms, natural language processing, and predictive analytics. These technologies enable users to uncover deeper insights, identify patterns, and predict future trends. The integration of AI not only enhances the analytical capabilities of BI tools but also automates processes, reducing manual efforts and improving the overall efficiency of data analysis. This trend aligns with the industry's pursuit of more intelligent and automated BI solutions to derive maximum value from data assets.

In March 2020, IBM created a new, dynamic global dashboard to display the global spread of COVID-19 with the assistance of IBM Cognos Analytics. The World Health Organization (WHO) and state and municipal governments provide the COVID-19 data displayed in this dashboard.

Source-www.ibm.com/blog/creating-trusted-covid-19-data-for-communities/

Market Dynamics of the Business Intelligence tool Market

Data Security and Privacy Concerns to Restrict Market Growth

One of the key restraints in the Business Intelligence Tools market revolves around persistent concerns regarding data security and privacy. As organizations increasingly rely on BI tools to process and analyze sensitive business information, the risk of data breaches and unauthorized access becomes a prominent challenge. Heightened awareness of regulatory requirements, such as GDPR, has intensified the focus on protecting sensitive data. Businesses face the challenge of implementing robust security measures within BI tools to ensure compliance with regulations and safeguard against potential data vulnerabilities, thereby slowing down the adoption pace.

Impact of COVID-19 on the Business Intelligence market

The COVID-19 pandemic has had a profound impact on the Business Intelligence (BI) market. As organizations grappled with unprecedented disruptions, the need for timely and accurate insights became paramount. The pandemic accelerated the adoption of BI tools as businesses sought to navigate uncertainties and make data-driven decisions. Remote work became a norm, prompting increased demand for BI solutions that support virtual collaboration and enable users to access analytics from anywhere. Moreover, there w...

The COKI Language Dataset contains predictions for 122 million academic publications. The dataset consists of DOI, title, ISO language code and the fastText language prediction probability score.

Methodology
A subset of the COKI Academic Observatory Dataset, which is produced by the Academic Observatory Workflows codebase [1], was extracted and converted to CSV with Bigquery and downloaded to a virtual machine. The subset consists of all publications with DOIs in our dataset, including each publication’s title and abstract from both Crossref Metadata and Microsoft Academic Graph. The CSV files were then processed with a Python script. The titles and abstracts for each record were pre-processed, concatenated together and analysed with fastText. The titles and abstracts from Crossref Metadata were used first, with the MAG titles and abstracts serving as a fallback when the Crossref Metadata information was empty. Language was predicted for each publication using the fastText lid.176.bin language identification model [2]. fastText was chosen because of its high accuracy and fast runtime speed [3]. The final output dataset consists of DOI, title, ISO language code and the fastText language prediction probability score.

Query or Download
The data is publicly accessible in BigQuery in the following two tables:

• coki-data-share.language.doi_language
• coki-data-share.language.iso_language

When you make queries on these tables, make sure that you are in your own Google Cloud project, otherwise the queries will fail.

See the COKI Language Detection README for instructions on how to download the data from Zenodo and load it into BigQuery.

Code
The code that generated this dataset, the BigQuery schemas and instructions for loading the data into BigQuery can be found here: https://github.com/The-Academic-Observatory/coki-language

License
COKI Language Dataset © 2022 by Curtin University is licenced under CC BY 4.0.

Attributions
This work contains information from:

• Microsoft Academic Graph which is made available under the ODC Attribution Licence.
• Crossref Metadata via the Metadata Plus program. Bibliographic metadata is made available without copyright restriction and Crossref generated data under a CC0 licence. See metadata licence information for more details.

References
[1] https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6366695
[2] https://fasttext.cc/docs/en/language-identification.html
[3] https://modelpredict.com/language-identification-survey

Non-Relational SQL Market Outlook

The Non-Relational SQL market size is projected to grow from USD 4.7 billion in 2023 to USD 15.8 billion by 2032, at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 14.5% during the forecast period. This significant growth can be attributed to the rising demand for scalable and flexible database management solutions that efficiently handle large volumes of unstructured data.

One of the primary growth factors driving the Non-Relational SQL market is the exponential increase in data generation from various sources such as social media, IoT devices, and enterprise applications. As businesses seek to leverage this data for gaining insights and making informed decisions, the need for databases that can manage and process unstructured data efficiently has become paramount. Non-Relational SQL databases, such as document stores and graph databases, provide the required flexibility and scalability, making them an ideal choice for modern data-driven enterprises.

Another significant growth factor is the increasing adoption of cloud-based solutions. Cloud deployment offers numerous advantages, including reduced infrastructure costs, scalability, and easier management. These benefits have led to a surge in the adoption of Non-Relational SQL databases hosted on cloud platforms. Major cloud service providers like Amazon Web Services, Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud offer robust Non-Relational SQL database services, further fueling market growth. Additionally, the integration of AI and machine learning with Non-Relational SQL databases is expected to enhance their capabilities, driving further adoption.

The rapid advancement in technology and the growing need for real-time data processing and analytics are also propelling the market's growth. Non-Relational SQL databases are designed to handle high-velocity data and provide quick query responses, making them suitable for real-time applications such as fraud detection, recommendation engines, and personalized marketing. As organizations increasingly rely on real-time data to enhance customer experiences and optimize operations, the demand for Non-Relational SQL databases is set to rise.

Regional outlook indicates that North America holds the largest share of the Non-Relational SQL market, driven by the presence of major technology companies and early adoption of advanced database technologies. However, the Asia Pacific region is expected to witness the highest growth rate during the forecast period, fueled by the rapid digital transformation initiatives and increasing investments in cloud infrastructure. Europe and Latin America also present significant growth opportunities due to the rising adoption of big data and analytics solutions.

Database Type Analysis

When analyzing the Non-Relational SQL market by database type, we observe that document stores hold a significant share of the market. Document stores, such as MongoDB and Couchbase, are particularly favored for their ability to store, retrieve, and manage document-oriented information. These databases are highly flexible, allowing for the storage of complex data structures and providing an intuitive query language. The increasing adoption of document stores can be ascribed to their ease of use and adaptability to various application requirements, making them a popular choice among developers and businesses.

Key-Value stores represent another crucial segment of the Non-Relational SQL market. These databases are known for their simplicity and high performance, making them ideal for caching, session management, and real-time data processing applications. Redis and Amazon DynamoDB are prominent examples of key-value stores that have gained widespread acceptance. The growing need for low-latency data access and the ability to handle massive volumes of data efficiently are key drivers for the adoption of key-value stores in various industries.

The market for column stores is also expanding as businesses require databases that can handle large-scale analytical queries efficiently. Columnar storage formats, such as Apache Cassandra and HBase, optimize read and write performance for analytical processing, making them suitable for big data analytics and business intelligence applications. The ability to perform complex queries on large datasets quickly is a significant advantage of column stores, driving their adoption in industries that rely heavily on data analytics.

Graph databases, such as Neo4j and Amazon Neptune, are gaining traction due to their ability to model