Eggs US rose to 2.55 USD/Dozen on June 30, 2025, up 0.67% from the previous day. Over the past month, Eggs US's price has risen 0.69%, and is up 4.71% compared to the same time last year, according to trading on a contract for difference (CFD) that tracks the benchmark market for this commodity. This dataset includes a chart with historical data for Eggs US.

Large white, Grade A chicken eggs, sold in a carton of a dozen. Includes organic, non-organic, cage free, free range, and traditional."

Eggs CH fell to 3,542 CNY/T on June 27, 2025, down 0.37% from the previous day. Over the past month, Eggs CH's price has risen 22.69%, but it is still 4.50% lower than a year ago, according to trading on a contract for difference (CFD) that tracks the benchmark market for this commodity. This dataset includes a chart with historical data for Eggs CH.

Large white, Grade A chicken eggs, sold in a carton of a dozen. Includes organic, non-organic, cage free, free range, and traditional."

This dataset includes data on China's egg market transaction prices from 2014-2021 and consists of 2 parts: (1) text data including the national egg market retail price statistics table (weekly), the national egg market wholesale price statistics table (daily), the national egg market wholesale price change information, the national and 12 provinces (autonomous regions and municipalities directly under the central government) monthly average wholesale prices and information on the rate of change; (2) picture data sets include monthly average wholesale prices and weekly retail prices and their rate of change line graphs for the national egg market from 2014-2021.

United States Wholesale Price: Eggs: Grade A: Large: New York data was reported at 5.330 USD/Dozen in Mar 2025. This records a decrease from the previous number of 8.198 USD/Dozen for Feb 2025. United States Wholesale Price: Eggs: Grade A: Large: New York data is updated monthly, averaging 1.075 USD/Dozen from Jan 2000 (Median) to Mar 2025, with 303 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 8.198 USD/Dozen in Feb 2025 and a record low of 0.533 USD/Dozen in May 2002. United States Wholesale Price: Eggs: Grade A: Large: New York data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Economic Research Service. The data is categorized under Global Database’s United States – Table US.P004: Poultry and Egg Price.

This dataset collection contains information about the selling prices of eggs quoted by packing plants in Finland. The dataset tables are sourced from the website of the Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), which is the owner of the data. Luke is a research organization based in Finland. The collection provides valuable insights into the pricing trends of eggs in the Finnish market.

Note: Updates to this data product are discontinued. This data set provides farmgate and wholesale prices for select organic and conventional fruits and vegetables, wholesale prices for organic and conventional poultry (broilers) and eggs, as well as f.o.b. and spot prices for organic grain and feedstuffs. Prices are based on those reported by USDA Agricultural Marketing Service Market News, Organic Food Business News, and USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service.This record was taken from the USDA Enterprise Data Inventory that feeds into the https://data.gov catalog. Data for this record includes the following resources: Web page with links to Excel files For complete information, please visit https://data.gov.

Get the latest insights on price movement and trend analysis of Eggs in different regions across the world (Asia, Europe, North America, Latin America, and the Middle East Africa).

This data set provides monthly average price values, and the differences among those values, at the farm, wholesale, and retail stages of the production and marketing chain for selected cuts of beef, pork, and broilers. In addition, retail prices are provided for beef and pork cuts, turkey, whole chickens, eggs, and dairy products. Price spreads are reported for last 6 years, 12 quarters, and 24 months. The retail price file provides monthly estimates for the last 6 months. The historical file provides data since 1970.

Indonesia Retail Price: Purebred Chicken Egg data was reported at 23,062.000 IDR/kg in Jul 2019. This records an increase from the previous number of 22,972.000 IDR/kg for Jun 2019. Indonesia Retail Price: Purebred Chicken Egg data is updated monthly, averaging 17,558.000 IDR/kg from Jan 2008 (Median) to Jul 2019, with 139 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 25,100.000 IDR/kg in Jul 2018 and a record low of 10,439.000 IDR/kg in Feb 2008. Indonesia Retail Price: Purebred Chicken Egg data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Central Bureau of Statistics. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Indonesia – Table ID.PC001: Retail Price: By Major Commodities.

This release combines the UK egg packing station survey, the UK egg processor survey, the egg laying element of the UK hatcheries survey, together with other DEFRA statistics, Intrastat trade data and EU data. Source agency: Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Designation: National Statistics Language: English Alternative title: Egg Statistics Notice

If you require the data in a more accessible format, please contact julie.rumsey@defra.gsi.gov.uk

Data users: 1. The information in this notice is used by the UK government and the EU as evidence for assessing market conditions and evaluating agricultural policy. The farmgate price of UK eggs are required quarterly under Regulation EC 1165/2008 (Animal Production). 2. Representatives of the egg and poultry industry are also major users of the data. The data on egg production volumes and egg type are the key sector indicators for the British Egg Industry Council (BEIC) as they reflect the size of the national laying flock. The Home Grown Cereals Authority (HGCA), part of the Agricultural and Horticultural Development Board, rely on egg production data as a good indicator of the commercial layer flock and associated feed demand and hence grain usage by the sector. Our statistics are also often heavily referenced in industry publications such as “Poultry World”. Methodology: 3. Defra runs a quarterly survey of registered UK egg packing stations. It is a voluntary sample survey of 27 respondents that collects information on throughput by production type and prices of graded eggs and sales of ungraded eggs. The response rate is typically 100 per cent and the survey accounts for 75 per cent of eggs packed in the UK. The survey figures are raised up to give UK estimates using information on the number of commercial laying hens, average egg yields, average mortality rates, the proportion of UK eggs that go through packing stations. Throughput by egg type for packing stations not surveyed is calculated using data provided by packing stations responding to the survey. The raised figures are published in this statistics notice and the associated datasets. The figures in this notice therefore represent all Class A eggs passed over a grader in the UK, including seconds. The prices obtained on the survey are weighted according to the volume of eggs packed by each packing station to obtained average prices for the UK. From 2012, prices include any bonus payments paid to producers. The Egg Processor survey is a quarterly survey of all registered egg processors. It is a voluntary survey of 13 respondents run by Defra that collects information on the number of eggs bought by egg processors and the quantity of egg products produced. The response rate is typically 100 per cent . These figures come from HM Revenue and Customs, but are validated and adjusted if necessary prior to publication. The Standard Industrial Classification codes used to produce each table are given in the footnotes below the tables. 4. In tables that show numbers of eggs the units used are 'thousand cases'. There are 360 eggs in one case. 5. The data are subject to a variety of validation checks which identify inconsistencies in the data. All data are cleaned prior to publication. 6. The percentage changes shown are calculated using unrounded figures. Thus any percentage changes calculated using the published (rounded) figures may not equate exactly with the changes shown. Revisions policy: 7. Figures in this dataset are provisional and subject to revision. We will provide information about any revisions we make to previously published information in this dataset, and the associated statistics notice. Revisions could occur for various reasons including : a. if we have not received survey data from respondents we make an estimate based on their previous returns. These estimates will be replaced with actual survey data when it is received. b. survey respondents occasionally supply amended figures for previous periods. c. we may also revise the methodology used to raise the survey data to give UK totals. This quarter there are no revisions to previously published throughput figures

This dataset collection comprises one or more tables containing information on the selling prices of eggs quoted by packing plants in European Union (EU) countries. The tables in this collection were sourced from the web site of Luke, the Natural Resources Institute Finland, located in Finland.

United States Wholesale Price: Eggs: Grade A: Large: Combined Regional data was reported at 5.127 USD/Dozen in Mar 2025. This records a decrease from the previous number of 8.222 USD/Dozen for Feb 2025. United States Wholesale Price: Eggs: Grade A: Large: Combined Regional data is updated monthly, averaging 1.021 USD/Dozen from Jan 2000 (Median) to Mar 2025, with 303 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 8.222 USD/Dozen in Feb 2025 and a record low of 0.428 USD/Dozen in May 2006. United States Wholesale Price: Eggs: Grade A: Large: Combined Regional data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Economic Research Service. The data is categorized under Global Database’s United States – Table US.P004: Poultry and Egg Price.

AJM06 - Manufacturing Milk and Hen Egg Prices (including VAT). Published by Central Statistics Office. Available under the license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY-4.0).Manufacturing Milk and Hen Egg Prices (including VAT)...

This dataset collection contains monthly producer prices of eggs in 100 kg units. The data tables are sourced from the web site of Luke in Finland.

Selling prices of fresh eggs

Body size is a critical component of organismal biology. Body size is known to be influenced by a plethora of environmental conditions, among which exposure to large-scale variations of salinity has been comparatively overlooked. Yet, exposure to salinity is known to affect energetic allocation toward growth and reproduction. In this study, we investigated the morphological differences between inland and coastal individuals of spined toads (Bufo spinosus) in Western France. We measured adult morphology both outside and during the reproductive season on 190 individuals, and assessed reproduction in pairs originating from inland (N=20) and coastal (N=30) environments. Overall, we found that adult coastal toads were smaller and lighter than inland individuals. Reproductive correlates of these differences included lower fecundity and smaller egg size (but higher egg density) in coastal females. Interestingly, these differences were not allometric correlates of body size, as coastal females invested proportionally less in all components of reproduction (fecundity, egg size and egg protection). These results suggest altered resource allocation to growth and reproduction in coastal amphibians, which may be related to the marked spatial gradient of salinity (measured in reproductive ponds) and the associated costs of osmoregulation (higher osmolality in coastal individuals), for which local adaptation and higher tolerance to salinity remains to be tested.

Methods The dataset is related to the article “The costs of living on the coast: reduction in body size and size-specific reproductive output in coastal populations of a widespread amphibian”. This article was meant to compare coastal and inland individuals of the species Bufo spinosus. These individuals were captured either during reproduction (50 amplectant pairs [amplexus], each constituted of one male [M] and one female [F], captured in ponds, from 16/02/2022 to 02/03/2022), or outside reproduction (90 individuals captured on roads, from 08/09/2022 to 15/10/2022). We provided two datasets, each one corresponding to one period of capture. These datasets allow us to determine differences in investment during reproduction, but also in morphology, between coastal and inland populations. Precise locations can be given on demand but were not included in the dataset as some captures were performed in natural reserves. Site (coastal or inland) is indicated, as well as date of capture. Individuals or amplectant pairs are identified by a letter corresponding to the site of capture (C for coastal and M for inland) as well as a number corresponding to their order of capture. During reproduction, for each amplexus (constituted of one male and one female), we assessed time to laying (time between capture and laying), egg strings’ length (mm), eggs’ diameter (mm), eggs’ density (number of eggs/mm) and number of eggs (all determined using the ImageJ software), size of both males and females (SVL: Snout-Vent-Length, given in mm), and calculated the size difference between a male and female in the same amplexus (both absolute and given in percentage), the initial (at capture) and final (after egg laying) of males and females, and the difference in mass between capture and egg laying (both absolute and given in percentage). Outside reproduction, we captured 45 males (M) and 45 females (F) independently (these individuals were opportunistically captured on roads in either coastal or inland locations), and computed their size (SVL: Snout-Vent-Length, given in mm) and mass (given in g).

data for analysis of arrival date in year 2, Costs of reproductiondata for analysis of arrival date in year 2, data collected in the field during a long-term population monitoring project, data set compiled from original data which are stored in Excel files, description of variables (column headings) can be found in the ReadMe fileyear2_ArrivalDate_jav00623.txtdata for analysis of egg laying date in year 2, Cost of reproductiondata for analysis of egg laying date in year 2, data collected in the field during a long-term population monitoring project, data set compiled from original data which are stored in Excel files, description of variables (column headings) can be found in the ReadMe fileyear2_EggLayDate_jav00623.txtdata for analysis of the interval between arrival date and egg laying date in year 2, Cost of reproductiondata for analysis of the interval between arrival date and egg laying date in year 2, data collected in the field during a long-term population monitoring project, data set compiled from original data which are stored in Excel files, description of variables (column headings) can be found in the ReadMe fileyear2_ArrBreedInterval_jav00623.txtdata for analysis of the number of fledglings produced in year 2, Cost of reproductiondata for analysis of the number of fledglings produced in year 2, data collected in the field during a long-term population monitoring project, data set compiled from original data which are stored in Excel files, description of variables (column headings) can be found in the ReadMe fileyear2_Fledglings_jav00623.txtdata for analysis of female survival to year 2, Cost of reproductiondata for analysis of female survival to year 2, data collected in the field during a long-term population monitoring project, data set compiled from original data which are stored in Excel files, description of variables (column headings) can be found in the ReadMe fileyear2_Survival_jav00623.txtdata for analysis of four fitness parameters in year 1, Cost of reproductiondata for analysis of four fitness parameters in year 1, data collected in the field during a long-term population monitoring project, data set compiled from original data which are stored in Excel files, description of variables (column headings) can be found in the ReadMe filewithin_season_jav00623.txt Timing of breeding is a trait with considerable individual variation, often closely linked to fitness because of seasonal declines in reproduction. The drivers of this variation have received much attention, but how reproductive costs may influence the timing of subsequent breeding has been largely unexplored. We examined a population of northern wheatears Oenanthe oenanthe to compare three groups of individuals that differed in their timing of breeding termination and reproductive effort to investigate how these factors may carry over to influence reproductive timing and reproductive output in the following season. Compared to females that bred successfully, females that put in less effort and terminated breeding early due to nest failure tended to arrive and breed earlier in year 2 (mean advancement = 2.2 and 3.3 d respectively). Females that spent potentially more effort and terminated breeding later due to production of a replacement clutch after nest failure, arrived later than other females in year 2. Reproductive output (number of fledglings) in year 2 differed between the three groups as a result of group-level differences in the timing of breeding in combination with the general seasonal decline in reproductive output. Our study shows that the main cost of reproduction was apparent in the timing of arrival and breeding in this migratory species. Hence, reproductive costs can arise through altered timing of breeding since future reproductive success (including adult survival) is often dependent on the timing of breeding in seasonal systems.

Measuring reproductive costs is crucial to understanding sexual conflict and its evolutionary outcomes. Sexual conflict is thought to originate from anisogamy – the size difference between male and female gametes; if sperm are tiny and not produced in vastly greater numbers than eggs, at any mating females’ gametic investment is larger than that of males. Testing this prediction has proven difficult, especially because males and females differ in many more traits than just gamete size. We overcame this difficulty by exposing simultaneously hermaphroditic polychaete worms Ophryotrocha diadema (two sexual functions in the same body) to two social conditions, pairs and groups>2, where hermaphrodites invest either relatively more in the female function or relatively more in the male function, respectively. Then we measured four markers of cellular oxidative status, a physiological mediator of life-history strategies. Less female-biased hermaphrodites produced fewer eggs but, unexpectedly, had lower levels of antioxidant protection than more female-biased hermaphrodites, which produced more eggs. Male-biased hermaphrodites compete for mating as males (hermaphrodites in pairs do not) suggesting that in the short-term male competition might be costlier than egg production in terms of regulation of oxidative status. These results highlight the need of including behavioral traits, namely competition over egg fertilization, in the measures of reproductive costs.