This strategic R&D Framework was developed to improve medical, functional, and public health outcomes through R&D in the use of data and IT for advanced health IT applications and improved detection of existing health concerns and discovery of emerging issues. It is expected that this Framework will help the United States capitalize on the full potential of health IT to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of healthcare and lengthen and improve the quality of American lives. This Framework will also help Federal agencies work across silos and prioritize areas for transformation by investing in tools and technologies that open new areas of discovery and better coordination of R&D activities. It does not define specific research agendas for individual Federal agencies; instead, agencies will continue to pursue priorities consistent with their missions, capabilities, authorities, and budgets, while maximizing planning, collaboration, and coordination with one another through the HITRD IWG to avoid duplicative efforts.
The Research and Development Survey (RANDS) is a platform designed for conducting survey question evaluation and statistical research. RANDS is an ongoing series of surveys from probability-sampled commercial survey panels used for methodological research at the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS). RANDS estimates are generated using an experimental approach that differs from the survey design approaches generally used by NCHS, including possible biases from different response patterns and sampling frames as well as increased variability from lower sample sizes. Use of the RANDS platform allows NCHS to produce more timely data than would be possible using traditional data collection methods. RANDS is not designed to replace NCHS’ higher quality, core data collections. Below are experimental estimates of reduced access to healthcare for three rounds of RANDS during COVID-19. Data collection for the three rounds of RANDS during COVID-19 occurred between June 9, 2020 and July 6, 2020, August 3, 2020 and August 20, 2020, and May 17, 2021 and June 30, 2021. Information needed to interpret these estimates can be found in the Technical Notes. RANDS during COVID-19 included questions about unmet care in the last 2 months during the coronavirus pandemic. Unmet needs for health care are often the result of cost-related barriers. The National Health Interview Survey, conducted by NCHS, is the source for high-quality data to monitor cost-related health care access problems in the United States. For example, in 2018, 7.3% of persons of all ages reported delaying medical care due to cost and 4.8% reported needing medical care but not getting it due to cost in the past year. However, cost is not the only reason someone might delay or not receive needed medical care. As a result of the coronavirus pandemic, people also may not get needed medical care due to cancelled appointments, cutbacks in transportation options, fear of going to the emergency room, or an altruistic desire to not be a burden on the health care system, among other reasons. The Household Pulse Survey (https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/covid19/pulse/reduced-access-to-care.htm), an online survey conducted in response to the COVID-19 pandemic by the Census Bureau in partnership with other federal agencies including NCHS, also reports estimates of reduced access to care during the pandemic (beginning in Phase 1, which started on April 23, 2020). The Household Pulse Survey reports the percentage of adults who delayed medical care in the last 4 weeks or who needed medical care at any time in the last 4 weeks for something other than coronavirus but did not get it because of the pandemic. The experimental estimates on this page are derived from RANDS during COVID-19 and show the percentage of U.S. adults who were unable to receive medical care (including urgent care, surgery, screening tests, ongoing treatment, regular checkups, prescriptions, dental care, vision care, and hearing care) in the last 2 months. Technical Notes: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/covid19/rands/reduced-access-to-care.htm#limitations
https://www.marketreportanalytics.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.marketreportanalytics.com/privacy-policy
The Clinical Healthcare IT market, valued at $0.39 billion in 2025, is projected to experience robust growth, exhibiting a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 24.22% from 2025 to 2033. This expansion is fueled by several key drivers. The increasing adoption of Electronic Health Records (EHRs) to improve patient care, streamline administrative processes, and enhance data analysis is a significant factor. Furthermore, the rising demand for telehealth and telemedicine solutions, driven by the need for remote patient monitoring and access to care, particularly in underserved areas, significantly contributes to market growth. The growing prevalence of chronic diseases and the need for efficient disease management also fuels investment in Computerized Provider Order Entry (CPOE) systems and Lab Information Management Systems (LIMS). Government initiatives promoting digital health infrastructure and interoperability further catalyze market expansion. While data privacy concerns and the high initial investment costs associated with implementing these technologies represent potential restraints, the long-term benefits in terms of improved efficiency, reduced errors, and enhanced patient outcomes are expected to outweigh these challenges. The market is segmented by software (EHRs, LIMS, Telehealth, CPOE, etc.) and end-user (Government/Public Health, Private Hospitals/Diagnostic Centers). North America currently holds a dominant market share, given the advanced healthcare infrastructure and high technology adoption rates in the United States and Canada. However, Asia-Pacific is projected to show substantial growth, driven by increasing healthcare expenditure and technological advancements in countries like India and China. The competitive landscape is dynamic, with established players like Epic Systems Corporation, Cerner Corporation, and GE Healthcare competing with smaller, specialized companies. Strategic partnerships, mergers, and acquisitions are likely to shape the market in the coming years. The focus will likely shift towards solutions that offer advanced analytics, artificial intelligence (AI)-driven diagnostics, and seamless integration across different healthcare systems. The market's growth trajectory suggests a significant increase in the adoption of clinical healthcare IT solutions globally, transforming how healthcare services are delivered and managed. The continued investment in research and development of innovative technologies will further accelerate this transformation. Recent developments include: April 2024: The Union Health Ministry launched the innovative myCGHS app for iOS devices, aiming to boost access to EHR, information, and resources for the beneficiaries of the Central Government Health Scheme (CGHS)., March 2024: Emory Healthcare led the way in transforming how clinicians access patient health records with its deployment of the 15-inch MacBook Air and the launch of the new native Epic Hyperspace app. This marked the first time Epic was made available to clinicians on the Mac App Store.. Key drivers for this market are: Complex Healthcare Datasets and Implementation of AI and ML, Increase in Cloud-based Deployment. Potential restraints include: Complex Healthcare Datasets and Implementation of AI and ML, Increase in Cloud-based Deployment. Notable trends are: Electronic Health Record (EHR) is Expected to Witness Significant Growth.
https://www.datainsightsmarket.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.datainsightsmarket.com/privacy-policy
The Precision Medicine Research and Development Platform market, valued at $80,950 million in 2025, is projected to experience robust growth, driven by a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 5.2% from 2025 to 2033. This expansion is fueled by several key factors. The increasing prevalence of chronic diseases necessitates personalized treatment approaches, significantly boosting demand for advanced platforms like genomics, proteomics, and transcriptomics. Furthermore, breakthroughs in next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies are enabling faster, more cost-effective analysis of large datasets, accelerating drug discovery and development. The rising adoption of AI and machine learning in analyzing complex biological data further enhances the efficiency and accuracy of precision medicine research. Technological advancements and increased research funding from both public and private sectors are also contributing significantly to market growth. Leading companies like Illumina, Thermo Fisher Scientific, and Qiagen are at the forefront of innovation, driving market competition and fostering continuous improvement in platform capabilities. The market segmentation shows strong growth potential across various applications, including personalized medicine and drug discovery, with genomics platforms currently holding a significant market share. Regional variations in market growth are expected, with North America and Europe anticipated to dominate initially due to advanced healthcare infrastructure, robust regulatory frameworks, and substantial research investments. However, the Asia-Pacific region is poised for significant growth in the coming years, driven by expanding healthcare spending, increasing awareness of precision medicine, and a growing number of research institutions. While challenges such as high platform costs and the need for skilled professionals remain, the overall market outlook remains positive, reflecting a growing global commitment to developing effective, targeted therapies for improved patient outcomes. The increasing availability of large-scale genomic and clinical data sets will further enhance the effectiveness and adoption of precision medicine platforms in the long term.
According to our latest research, the global synthetic medical image data services market size stood at USD 452 million in 2024, reflecting robust adoption across healthcare and life sciences sectors. The market is expected to grow at a remarkable CAGR of 33.7% from 2025 to 2033, reaching a projected value of USD 5.4 billion by 2033. This exponential growth is primarily driven by the escalating demand for high-quality, diverse, and annotated medical imaging datasets to power artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) algorithms for diagnostics, research, and training purposes. As per our comprehensive analysis, the rapid integration of synthetic data solutions is revolutionizing medical imaging workflows, enabling healthcare stakeholders to overcome data scarcity and privacy concerns while accelerating innovation.
The synthetic medical image data services market is experiencing significant growth due to the increasing need for large, annotated datasets to train and validate AI-driven diagnostic tools. Traditional approaches to medical image acquisition are often hampered by regulatory restrictions, data privacy concerns, and the inherent variability and scarcity of rare disease cases. Synthetic data generation addresses these challenges by creating realistic, customizable, and privacy-compliant datasets that enhance the performance and generalizability of AI models. Furthermore, the adoption of synthetic data accelerates the development cycle for new imaging technologies and supports the validation of medical devices, fostering a more agile and innovative healthcare ecosystem. The growing sophistication of generative adversarial networks (GANs) and other deep learning techniques has further improved the realism and utility of synthetic images, making them increasingly indispensable for modern medical imaging applications.
Another key growth factor for the synthetic medical image data services market is the rising emphasis on data privacy and compliance with regulations such as HIPAA in the United States and GDPR in Europe. These regulations impose stringent requirements on the use and sharing of patient data, often limiting the availability of real-world medical images for research and commercial purposes. Synthetic data offers a compelling solution by generating de-identified datasets that closely mimic real patient data without exposing sensitive information. This not only facilitates collaborative research and cross-institutional projects but also enables companies to scale their AI development efforts globally without the risk of data breaches or legal repercussions. As the healthcare industry continues to prioritize patient confidentiality, the demand for synthetic data services is expected to surge.
The market is further propelled by the expanding applications of synthetic medical image data in education, training, and research. Medical professionals, students, and researchers increasingly rely on diverse and complex datasets to hone their diagnostic skills, test new hypotheses, and develop innovative imaging solutions. Synthetic data bridges the gap where real-world datasets are insufficient or unavailable, providing a cost-effective and scalable alternative for simulation-based training and validation. This capability is especially valuable in regions with limited access to advanced imaging resources or rare clinical cases. As academic and research institutions intensify their focus on AI and machine learning in healthcare, synthetic data services are poised to become a cornerstone of medical education and innovation.
From a regional perspective, North America currently leads the synthetic medical image data services market, accounting for the largest share due to its advanced healthcare infrastructure, strong presence of AI technology providers, and supportive regulatory environment. Europe follows closely, driven by robust investments in digital health and a proactive stance on data privacy. The Asia Pacific region is emerging as a high-growth market, fueled by rapid digital transformation, increasing healthcare expenditure, and a burgeoning ecosystem of AI startups. Latin America and the Middle East & Africa, while still nascent, are expected to witness accelerated adoption as healthcare modernization initiatives gain momentum. Overall, the global market landscape is characterized by dynamic growth opportunities, with both developed and emerging regions contributing to the expansion of synthetic medical image da
https://www.marketreportanalytics.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.marketreportanalytics.com/privacy-policy
The Real-World Evidence (RWE) Solutions market is experiencing robust growth, projected to reach $828.46 million in 2025 and expand at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 13% from 2025 to 2033. This significant expansion is driven by several key factors. The increasing adoption of RWE in regulatory decision-making, fueled by the need for more efficient and cost-effective drug development, is a primary driver. Furthermore, the rising availability of large, diverse datasets from electronic health records (EHRs), claims databases, and wearable devices provides rich sources of real-world data for analysis. Pharmaceutical companies and healthcare providers are actively investing in RWE solutions to improve clinical trial design, enhance post-market surveillance, and optimize treatment strategies, further bolstering market growth. The market is segmented by type (e.g., software, services) and application (e.g., drug development, post-market surveillance), each exhibiting unique growth trajectories influenced by specific technological advancements and regulatory landscapes. Competitive strategies among leading companies, such as Clinigen Group Plc, ICON Plc, and IQVIA Inc., focus on strategic partnerships, technological innovation, and expansion into new geographical markets. These companies are engaged in developing advanced analytical tools and data integration platforms to cater to growing demands for comprehensive RWE solutions. The North American market currently holds a substantial share, driven by robust regulatory frameworks and advanced healthcare infrastructure. However, other regions, particularly Asia Pacific, are expected to witness significant growth in the coming years due to increasing healthcare expenditure and technological advancements. The restraints on market growth are primarily related to data privacy concerns, regulatory hurdles in accessing and utilizing real-world data, and the need for robust data standardization across different sources. However, proactive measures like developing better data security protocols, clarifying regulatory guidelines, and investing in data harmonization initiatives are mitigating these challenges. The future of the RWE Solutions market hinges on continuous technological innovation, particularly in areas like artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML), which can enhance data analysis and generate valuable insights from complex datasets. Further growth will depend on fostering collaboration among stakeholders, including regulatory bodies, healthcare providers, and technology companies, to create a more conducive environment for RWE adoption.
By Data Exercises [source]
This dataset is a comprehensive collection of data from county-level cancer mortality and incidence rates in the United States between 2000-2014. This data provides an unprecedented level of detail into cancer cases, deaths, and trends at a local level. The included columns include County, FIPS, age-adjusted death rate, average death rate per year, recent trend (2) in death rates, recent 5-year trend (2) in death rates and average annual count for each county. This dataset can be used to provide deep insight into the patterns and effects of cancer on communities as well as help inform policy decisions related to mitigating risk factors or increasing preventive measures such as screenings. With this comprehensive set of records from across the United States over 15 years, you will be able to make informed decisions regarding individual patient care or policy development within your own community!
For more datasets, click here.
- 🚨 Your notebook can be here! 🚨!
This dataset provides comprehensive US county-level cancer mortality and incidence rates from 2000 to 2014. It includes the mortality and incidence rate for each county, as well as whether the county met the objective of 45.5 deaths per 100,000 people. It also provides information on recent trends in death rates and average annual counts of cases over the five year period studied.
This dataset can be extremely useful to researchers looking to study trends in cancer death rates across counties. By using this data, researchers will be able to gain valuable insight into how different counties are performing in terms of providing treatment and prevention services for cancer patients and whether preventative measures and healthcare access are having an effect on reducing cancer mortality rates over time. This data can also be used to inform policy makers about counties needing more target prevention efforts or additional resources for providing better healthcare access within at risk communities.
When using this dataset, it is important to pay close attention to any qualitative columns such as “Recent Trend” or “Recent 5-Year Trend (2)” that may provide insights into long term changes that may not be readily apparent when using quantitative variables such as age-adjusted death rate or average deaths per year over shorter periods of time like one year or five years respectively. Additionally, when studying differences between different counties it is important to take note of any standard FIPS code differences that may indicate that data was collected by a different source with a difference methodology than what was used in other areas studied
- Using this dataset, we can identify patterns in cancer mortality and incidence rates that are statistically significant to create treatment regimens or preventive measures specifically targeting those areas.
- This data can be useful for policymakers to target areas with elevated cancer mortality and incidence rates so they can allocate financial resources to these areas more efficiently.
- This dataset can be used to investigate which factors (such as pollution levels, access to medical care, genetic make up) may have an influence on the cancer mortality and incidence rates in different US counties
If you use this dataset in your research, please credit the original authors. Data Source
License: Dataset copyright by authors - You are free to: - Share - copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially. - Adapt - remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. - You must: - Give appropriate credit - Provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. - ShareAlike - You must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original. - Keep intact - all notices that refer to this license, including copyright notices.
File: death .csv | Column name | Description | |:-------------------------------------------|:-------------------------------------------------------------------...
According to our latest research, the global Quantum-Enhanced Medical Diagnosis Support market size reached $1.24 billion in 2024, reflecting a rapidly expanding field driven by the integration of quantum technologies into healthcare diagnostics. The market is expected to maintain a robust trajectory, with a projected CAGR of 32.8% from 2025 to 2033, culminating in a forecasted market size of $15.42 billion by 2033. This remarkable growth is propelled by the increasing demand for faster, more accurate diagnostic solutions leveraging quantum computing, machine learning, and advanced imaging technologies.
The primary growth factor fueling the Quantum-Enhanced Medical Diagnosis Support market is the urgent need for enhanced diagnostic precision and speed in the face of rising global disease burden, especially in oncology, cardiology, and neurology. Traditional diagnostic methods, while effective, often fall short in handling the complexity and volume of modern medical data. Quantum technologies, particularly quantum machine learning and quantum computing, offer unparalleled computational power and the ability to identify intricate patterns within vast datasets, enabling early detection and more personalized treatment strategies. This capability is especially critical as healthcare systems worldwide strive to improve patient outcomes, reduce diagnostic errors, and streamline workflow efficiency.
Another significant driver is the surge in research and development investments from both public and private sectors. Governments in technologically advanced regions such as North America and Europe are providing substantial funding for quantum technology initiatives, recognizing their transformative potential in healthcare. Simultaneously, leading technology firms and startups are collaborating with medical institutions to pilot quantum-enhanced diagnostic platforms, accelerating the translation of theoretical advancements into practical clinical tools. These partnerships are not only fostering innovation but also addressing regulatory and integration challenges, paving the way for broader market adoption.
The growing adoption of cloud-based deployment models further accelerates market expansion. Cloud-based quantum solutions lower the barrier to entry for healthcare providers by reducing infrastructure costs and enabling scalable, on-demand access to quantum-powered diagnostic tools. This democratization of advanced diagnostics is particularly impactful for smaller hospitals and diagnostic centers, which may lack the resources for on-premises quantum systems. Additionally, the cloud facilitates seamless updates, interoperability with existing health IT systems, and secure data sharing, all of which are crucial for meeting evolving clinical and regulatory requirements.
Regionally, North America currently dominates the Quantum-Enhanced Medical Diagnosis Support market, benefitting from a robust innovation ecosystem, significant healthcare expenditure, and early adoption of cutting-edge technologies. Europe follows closely, driven by strong government support and a well-established healthcare infrastructure. The Asia Pacific region is rapidly emerging as a high-growth market, with increasing investments in quantum research and expanding healthcare needs among a growing population. Latin America and the Middle East & Africa, while smaller in market size, are expected to witness accelerated growth as quantum technologies become more accessible and affordable.
The technology segment of the Quantum-Enhanced Medical Diagnosis Support market encompasses quantum machine learning, quantum imaging, quantum sensing, and quantum computing, each contributing uniquely to the advancement of diagnostic capabilities. Quantum machine learning stands out as a transformative force, enabling the processing and analysis of complex medical datasets at unprecedented speeds. By leveraging quantum algorithms, healthcare providers can unco
https://dataintelo.com/privacy-and-policyhttps://dataintelo.com/privacy-and-policy
The lung cancer diagnostic tests market size was valued at USD 2.5 billion in 2023 and is projected to reach USD 6.1 billion by 2032, growing at a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 10.5% during the forecast period. This substantial growth can be attributed to the rising prevalence of lung cancer globally, advancements in diagnostic technologies, and increasing awareness regarding early detection and treatment of lung cancer. The growing aging population and the high incidence of smoking, which is a leading cause of lung cancer, further propel the demand for diagnostic tests.
The increasing prevalence of lung cancer is one of the primary drivers of market growth. Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, necessitating the development of more accurate and early diagnostic methods. With advancements in medical technology, such as molecular diagnostics and non-invasive imaging techniques, the accuracy and efficiency of lung cancer diagnosis have significantly improved. These innovations not only enhance the detection rate but also facilitate personalized treatment plans, thereby improving patient outcomes.
Furthermore, government initiatives and funding for cancer research play a crucial role in market expansion. Many countries are investing heavily in cancer research, leading to the development of new diagnostic tools and techniques. For instance, organizations such as the National Cancer Institute (NCI) in the United States provide substantial grants for lung cancer research, fostering innovations in diagnostics. In addition, public awareness campaigns and screening programs conducted by healthcare organizations and governments encourage early diagnosis, which is vital for successful treatment and survival rates.
The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning in diagnostic tools is another significant factor contributing to market growth. AI algorithms can analyze medical images with high precision, aiding radiologists in identifying lung cancer at earlier stages. Moreover, AI-driven software can evaluate large datasets from genetic and molecular tests, providing insights into the most effective treatment options based on individual patient profiles. This technological advancement not only enhances the accuracy of diagnostics but also reduces the time required for analysis, thereby increasing the efficiency of healthcare services.
The EGFR Mutation Test is a pivotal advancement in the realm of lung cancer diagnostics, offering a more personalized approach to treatment. This test specifically identifies mutations in the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) gene, which are often present in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. By detecting these mutations, healthcare providers can tailor therapies that target the specific genetic alterations, thereby improving treatment efficacy and patient outcomes. The growing adoption of EGFR Mutation Tests underscores the shift towards precision medicine, where treatments are increasingly customized based on individual genetic profiles. This approach not only enhances the effectiveness of therapies but also minimizes adverse effects, as treatments are more accurately aligned with the patient's unique genetic makeup.
Regionally, North America holds the largest share of the lung cancer diagnostic tests market, followed by Europe and Asia Pacific. The dominance of North America can be attributed to the presence of advanced healthcare infrastructure, high healthcare expenditure, and a robust research landscape. The Asia Pacific region, however, is expected to witness the highest growth rate during the forecast period, driven by increasing healthcare investments, growing awareness about lung cancer, and rising incidences of the disease in countries like China and India. The growing middle-class population and improving healthcare access in these countries further support market growth.
The lung cancer diagnostic tests market is segmented by test type into imaging tests, sputum cytology, tissue biopsy, molecular tests, and others. Imaging tests are one of the most commonly used diagnostic methods for lung cancer detection. Techniques such as X-rays, CT scans, and PET scans provide detailed visuals of the lungs, helping in identifying abnormal growths or tumors. The non-invasive nature of these tests and their ability to provide quick results make them a preferred choice among healthcare
Apache License, v2.0https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
License information was derived automatically
Techsalerator’s Location Sentiment Data for Uganda
Techsalerator’s Location Sentiment Data for Uganda offers an extensive collection of data that is crucial for businesses, researchers, and technology developers. This dataset provides deep insights into public sentiment across various locations in Uganda, enabling data-driven decision-making for development, marketing, and social research.
For access to the full dataset, contact us at info@techsalerator.com or visit Techsalerator Contact Us.
Techsalerator’s Location Sentiment Data for Uganda delivers a comprehensive analysis of public sentiment across urban, rural, and industrial locations. This dataset is essential for businesses, government agencies, and researchers looking to understand the sentiment trends in different regions of Uganda.
To obtain Techsalerator’s Location Sentiment Data for Uganda, contact info@techsalerator.com with your specific requirements. Techsalerator offers customized datasets based on requested fields, with delivery available within 24 hours. Ongoing access options can also be discussed.
For deep insights into public sentiment across Uganda, Techsalerator’s dataset is an invaluable resource for businesses, policymakers, and researchers.
https://www.cognitivemarketresearch.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.cognitivemarketresearch.com/privacy-policy
According to Cognitive Market Research, the global AI Training Dataset Market size will be USD 2962.4 million in 2025. It will expand at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 28.60% from 2025 to 2033.
North America held the major market share for more than 37% of the global revenue with a market size of USD 1096.09 million in 2025 and will grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 26.4% from 2025 to 2033.
Europe accounted for a market share of over 29% of the global revenue, with a market size of USD 859.10 million.
APAC held a market share of around 24% of the global revenue with a market size of USD 710.98 million in 2025 and will grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 30.6% from 2025 to 2033.
South America has a market share of more than 3.8% of the global revenue, with a market size of USD 112.57 million in 2025 and will grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 27.6% from 2025 to 2033.
Middle East had a market share of around 4% of the global revenue and was estimated at a market size of USD 118.50 million in 2025 and will grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 27.9% from 2025 to 2033.
Africa had a market share of around 2.20% of the global revenue and was estimated at a market size of USD 65.17 million in 2025 and will grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 28.3% from 2025 to 2033.
Data Annotation category is the fastest growing segment of the AI Training Dataset Market
Market Dynamics of AI Training Dataset Market
Key Drivers for AI Training Dataset Market
Government-Led Open Data Initiatives Fueling AI Training Dataset Market Growth
In recent years, Government-initiated open data efforts have strongly driven the development of the AI Training Dataset Market through offering affordable, high-quality datasets that are vital in training sound AI models. For instance, the U.S. government's drive for openness and innovation can be seen through portals such as Data.gov, which provides an enormous collection of datasets from many industries, ranging from healthcare, finance, and transportation. Such datasets are basic building blocks in constructing AI applications and training models using real-world data. In the same way, the platform data.gov.uk, run by the U.K. government, offers ample datasets to aid AI research and development, creating an environment that is supportive of technological growth. By releasing such information into the public domain, governments not only enhance transparency but also encourage innovation in the AI industry, resulting in greater demand for training datasets and helping to drive the market's growth.
India's IndiaAI Datasets Platform Accelerates AI Training Dataset Market Growth
India's upcoming launch of the IndiaAI Datasets Platform in January 2025 is likely to greatly increase the AI Training Dataset Market. The project, which is part of the government's ?10,000 crore IndiaAI Mission, will establish an open-source repository similar to platforms such as HuggingFace to enable developers to create, train, and deploy AI models. The platform will collect datasets from central and state governments and private sector organizations to provide a wide and rich data pool. Through improved access to high-quality, non-personal data, the platform is filling an important requirement for high-quality datasets for training AI models, thus driving innovation and development in the AI industry. This public initiative reflects India's determination to become a global AI hub, offering the infrastructure required to facilitate startups, researchers, and businesses in creating cutting-edge AI solutions. The initiative not only simplifies data access but also creates a model for public-private partnerships in AI development.
Restraint Factor for the AI Training Dataset Market
Data Privacy Regulations Impeding AI Training Dataset Market Growth
Strict data privacy laws are coming up as a major constraint in the AI Training Dataset Market since governments across the globe are establishing legislation to safeguard personal data. In the European Union, explicit consent for using personal data is required under the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), reducing the availability of datasets for training AI. Likewise, the data protection regulator in Brazil ordered Meta and others to stop the use of Brazilian personal data in training AI models due to dangers to individuals' funda...
Welcome to the January 2018 issue of the NITRD Leads IT quarterly newsletter of the Networking and Information Technology Research and Development Program. "The NITRD Program will be essential in helping our Nation achieve a brighter future through advances in information technology (IT). Evidence of this is seen in past Federal IT R&D, which led to technologies that help us today (e.g. the Internet, Global Positioning System, and smartphone assistants). Current Federal IT R&D is creating a world of personalized learning, personalized healthcare, and computers capable of answering any technical question... The U.S. government has a decades-long record of helping to achieve a brighter future with advanced IT through two roles: leading the world's IT advancement through aggressive funding of IT R&D, and leading the use of IT for social good, as evidenced by recent NITRD area strategic plans, which seek societal interests as well as technology advancement..." - Dr. Bryan Biegel (Director of the National Coordination Office for Networking and Information).
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
By the middle of the 1990s, Indonesia had enjoyed over three decades of remarkable social, economic, and demographic change and was on the cusp of joining the middle-income countries. Per capita income had risen more than fifteenfold since the early 1960s, from around US$50 to more than US$800. Increases in educational attainment and decreases in fertility and infant mortality over the same period reflected impressive investments in infrastructure. In the late 1990s the economic outlook began to change as Indonesia was gripped by the economic crisis that affected much of Asia. In 1998 the rupiah collapsed, the economy went into a tailspin, and gross domestic product contracted by an estimated 12-15%-a decline rivaling the magnitude of the Great Depression. The general trend of several decades of economic progress followed by a few years of economic downturn masks considerable variation across the archipelago in the degree both of economic development and of economic setbacks related to the crisis. In part this heterogeneity reflects the great cultural and ethnic diversity of Indonesia, which in turn makes it a rich laboratory for research on a number of individual- and household-level behaviors and outcomes that interest social scientists. The Indonesia Family Life Survey is designed to provide data for studying behaviors and outcomes. The survey contains a wealth of information collected at the individual and household levels, including multiple indicators of economic and non-economic well-being: consumption, income, assets, education, migration, labor market outcomes, marriage, fertility, contraceptive use, health status, use of health care and health insurance, relationships among co-resident and non- resident family members, processes underlying household decision-making, transfers among family members and participation in community activities. In addition to individual- and household-level information, the IFLS provides detailed information from the communities in which IFLS households are located and from the facilities that serve residents of those communities. These data cover aspects of the physical and social environment, infrastructure, employment opportunities, food prices, access to health and educational facilities, and the quality and prices of services available at those facilities. By linking data from IFLS households to data from their communities, users can address many important questions regarding the impact of policies on the lives of the respondents, as well as document the effects of social, economic, and environmental change on the population. The Indonesia Family Life Survey complements and extends the existing survey data available for Indonesia, and for developing countries in general, in a number of ways. First, relatively few large-scale longitudinal surveys are available for developing countries. IFLS is the only large-scale longitudinal survey available for Indonesia. Because data are available for the same individuals from multiple points in time, IFLS affords an opportunity to understand the dynamics of behavior, at the individual, household and family and community levels. In IFLS1 7,224 households were interviewed, and detailed individual-level data were collected from over 22,000 individuals. In IFLS2, 94.4% of IFLS1 households were re-contacted (interviewed or died). In IFLS3 the re-contact rate was 95.3% of IFLS1 households. Indeed nearly 91% of IFLS1 households are complete panel households in that they were interviewed in all three waves, IFLS1, 2 and 3. These re-contact rates are as high as or higher than most longitudinal surveys in the United States and Europe. High re-interview rates were obtained in part because we were committed to tracking and interviewing individuals who had moved or split off from the origin IFLS1 households. High re-interview rates contribute significantly to data quality in a longitudinal survey because they lessen the risk of bias due to nonrandom attrition in studies using the data. Second, the multipurpose nature of IFLS instruments means that the data support analyses of interrelated issues not possible with single-purpose surveys. For example, the availability of data on household consumption together with detailed individual data on labor market outcomes, health outcomes and on health program availability and quality at the community level means that one can examine the impact of income on health outcomes, but also whether health in turn affects incomes. Third, IFLS collected both current and retrospective information on most topics. With data from multiple points of time on current status and an extensive array of retrospective information about the lives of respondents, analysts can relate dynamics to events that occurred in the past. For example, changes in labor outcomes in recent years can be explored as a function of earlier decisions about schooling and work. Fourth, IFLS collected extensive measures of health status, including self-reported measures of general health status, morbidity experience, and physical assessments conducted by a nurse (height, weight, head circumference, blood pressure, pulse, waist and hip circumference, hemoglobin level, lung capacity, and time required to repeatedly rise from a sitting position). These data provide a much richer picture of health status than is typically available in household surveys. For example, the data can be used to explore relationships between socioeconomic status and an array of health outcomes. Fifth, in all waves of the survey, detailed data were collected about respondentsÂą communities and public and private facilities available for their health care and schooling. The facility data can be combined with household and individual data to examine the relationship between, for example, access to health services (or changes in access) and various aspects of health care use and health status. Sixth, because the waves of IFLS span the period from several years before the economic crisis hit Indonesia, to just prior to it hitting, to one year and then three years after, extensive research can be carried out regarding the living conditions of Indonesian households during this very tumultuous period. In sum, the breadth and depth of the longitudinal information on individuals, households, communities, and facilities make IFLS data a unique resource for scholars and policymakers interested in the processes of economic development.
Longitudinal data set of a nationally representative sample of the population aged 65 and over in Japan, comparable to that collected in the US and other countries. The first two waves of data are now available to the international research community. The sample is refreshed with younger members at each wave so it remains representative of the population at each wave. The study was designed primarily to investigate health status of the Japanese elderly and changes in health status over time. An additional aim is to investigate the impact of long-term care insurance system on the use of services by the Japanese elderly and to investigate the relationship between co-residence and the use of long term care. While the focus of the survey is health and health service utilization, other topics relevant to the aging experience are included such as intergenerational exchange, living arrangements, caregiving, and labor force participation. The initial questionnaire was designed to be comparable to the (US) Longitudinal Study of Aging II (LSOAII), and to the Asset and Health Dynamics Among the Oldest Old (AHEAD, a pre-1924 birth cohort) sample of the Health and Retirement Study (HRS), which has now been merged with the HRS. The sample was selected using a multistage stratified sampling method to generate 340 primary sampling units (PSUs). The sample of individuals was selected for the most part by using the National Residents Registry System, considered to be universal and accurate because it is a legal requirement to report any move to local authorities within two weeks. From each of the 340 PSUs, 6-11 persons aged 65-74 were selected and 8-12 persons aged 75+ were sampled. The population 75+ was oversampled by a factor of 2. Weights have been developed for respondents to the first wave of the survey to reflect sampling probabilities. Weights for the second wave are under development. With these weights, the sample should be representative of the 65+ Japanese population. In fall 1999, 4,997 respondents aged 65+ were interviewed, 74.6 percent of the initial target. Twelve percent of responses were provided by proxies, because of physical or mental health problems. The second wave of data was collected in November 2001. The third wave was collected in November 2003. Questionnaire topics include family structure, and living arrangements; subjects'''' parents/spouse''''s parents/children; socioeconomic status; intergenerational exchange; health behaviors, chronic conditions, physical functioning; activities of daily living and instrumental activities of daily living; functioning in the community; mental health depression measures; vision and hearing; dental health; health care and other service utilization. A CD is available which include the codebook and data files for the first and second waves of the national sample. The third wave of data will be released at a later date. * Dates of Study: 1999-2003 * Study Features: Longitudinal, International * Sample Size: ** 4,997 Nov/Dec 1999 Wave 1 ** 3,992 Nov 2001 Wave 2 ** Nov 2003 Wave 3 Link: * ICPSR: http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/ICPSR/studies/00156
Not seeing a result you expected?
Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.
This strategic R&D Framework was developed to improve medical, functional, and public health outcomes through R&D in the use of data and IT for advanced health IT applications and improved detection of existing health concerns and discovery of emerging issues. It is expected that this Framework will help the United States capitalize on the full potential of health IT to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of healthcare and lengthen and improve the quality of American lives. This Framework will also help Federal agencies work across silos and prioritize areas for transformation by investing in tools and technologies that open new areas of discovery and better coordination of R&D activities. It does not define specific research agendas for individual Federal agencies; instead, agencies will continue to pursue priorities consistent with their missions, capabilities, authorities, and budgets, while maximizing planning, collaboration, and coordination with one another through the HITRD IWG to avoid duplicative efforts.