United States Electricity Consumption data was reported at 10.243 kWh/Day bn in Mar 2025. This records a decrease from the previous number of 11.765 kWh/Day bn for Feb 2025. United States Electricity Consumption data is updated monthly, averaging 9.940 kWh/Day bn from Jan 1991 (Median) to Mar 2025, with 411 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 13.179 kWh/Day bn in Jul 2024 and a record low of 7.190 kWh/Day bn in Apr 1991. United States Electricity Consumption data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by U.S. Energy Information Administration. The data is categorized under Global Database’s United States – Table US.RB004: Electricity Supply and Consumption. [COVID-19-IMPACT]

Electricity consumption in the United States totaled ***** terawatt-hours in 2023, one of the highest values in the period under consideration. Figures represent energy end use, which is the sum of retail sales and direct use of electricity by the producing entity. Electricity consumption in the U.S. is expected to continue increasing in the next decades. Which sectors consume the most electricity in the U.S.? Consumption has often been associated with economic growth. Nevertheless, technological improvements in efficiency and new appliance standards have led to a stabilizing of electricity consumption, despite the increased ubiquity of chargeable consumer electronics. Electricity consumption is highest in the residential sector, followed by the commercial sector. Equipment used for space heating and cooling account for some of the largest shares of residential electricity end use. Leading states in electricity use Industrial hub Texas is the leading electricity-consuming U.S. state. In 2022, the Southwestern state, which houses major refinery complexes and is also home to nearly ** million people, consumed over *** terawatt-hours. California and Florida trailed in second and third, each with an annual consumption of approximately *** terawatt-hours.

This data is aligned to eligibility criteria outlined in the United States Department of Energy (DOE) 2023 Communities LEAP (Local Energy Action Program). Please visit the LEAP website (https://www.energy.gov/communitiesLEAP/communities-leap) to learn more about LEAP and gain additional contextual information for how these data may be used. The data provided approximates how the eligibility criteria apply at the census tract level across the United States. This EDX submission provides access to information pertaining to each of the four eligibility criteria outlined (average energy burden, percent low income, communities with a historic economic dependence on fossil fuel industrial facilities, and disadvantaged communities) for all census tracts within the 50 U.S. States, the District of Columbia (D.C.), and Puerto Rico. This information can be access in a detailed excel spreadsheet or through the linked interactive web application (https://arcgis.netl.doe.gov/portal/apps/experiencebuilder/experience/?id=2a77f443d72b4a4d82474b3ffe33b8cd). Please note that while these data are provided at the census tract level, census tracts do not necessarily have the same physical boundaries as a community but were used as they provide the closest proxy based on publicly available information collected using an empirically robust method. U.S. territories are not listed but are eligible to apply to Communities LEAP. As stated in the Opportunity Announcement, applying communities should describe how they meet the eligibility criteria in their application even if these data do not specifically show that they are eligible. These data align to the White House’s The Interagency Working Group on Coal and Power Plant Communities and Economic Revitalization, https://energycommunities.gov/.

Google’s energy consumption has increased over the last few years, reaching 25.9 terawatt hours in 2023, up from 12.8 terawatt hours in 2019. The company has made efforts to make its data centers more efficient through customized high-performance servers, using smart temperature and lighting, advanced cooling techniques, and machine learning. Datacenters and energy Through its operations, Google pursues a more sustainable impact on the environment by creating efficient data centers that use less energy than the average, transitioning towards renewable energy, creating sustainable workplaces, and providing its users with the technological means towards a cleaner future for the future generations. Through its efficient data centers, Google has also managed to divert waste from its operations away from landfills. Reducing Google’s carbon footprint Google’s clean energy efforts is also related to their efforts to reduce their carbon footprint. Since their commitment to using 100 percent renewable energy, the company has met their targets largely through solar and wind energy power purchase agreements and buying renewable power from utilities. Google is one of the largest corporate purchasers of renewable energy in the world.

Understanding the residential energy consumption patterns across multiple income groups under decarbonization scenarios is crucial for designing equitable and effective energy policies that address climate change while minimizing disparities. This dataset is developed using an integrated human-Earth system model, supported by the Grid Operations, Decarbonization, Environmental and Energy Equity Platform (GODEEEP) Investment at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL). Compared to the first version of the dataset (https://zenodo.org/record/79880387), this updated dataset is based on model runs where the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) are implemented in the model scenarios. In addition to the queried and post-processed key output variables related to residential energy sector in .csv tables, we also upload the full model output databases in this repository, so that users can query their desired model outputs.

GCAM-USA operates within the Global Change Analysis Model (GCAM), which represents the behavior of, and interactions between, different sectors or systems, including the energy system, the economy, agriculture and land use, water, and the climate. GCAM is one of only a few integrated global human-Earth system models, also known as Integrated Assessment Models (IAMs), which address key processes in inter-linked human and earth systems and provide insights into future global environmental change under alternative scenarios (IAMC, 2022).

GCAM has global coverage with varying spatial disaggregation depending on the type of system being modeled. For energy and economy systems, 32 regions across the globe, including the USA as its own region, are modeled in GCAM. GCAM-USA advances with greater spatial detail in the USA region, which includes 50 States plus the District of Columbia (hereinafter “state”). The core operating principle for GCAM and GCAM-USA is market equilibrium. The model solves every market simultaneously at each time step where supply equals demand and prices are endogenous in the model. The official documentation of GCAM and GCAM-USA can be found at: https://jgcri.github.io/gcam-doc/toc.html.

The dataset included in this repository is based on an improved version of GCAM-USA v6, where multiple consumer groups, differentiated by the average income level for 10 population deciles, are represented in the residential building energy sector. As of September 24, 2023, the latest officially released version of GCAM-USA has a single consumer (represented by average GDP per capita) in the residential sector and thus does not include this feature. This multiple-consumer feature is important because (1) demand for residential floorspace and energy are non-linear in income, so modeling more income groups improves the representation of total demand and (2) this feature allows us to explore the distributional effects of policies on these different income groups and the resulting disparity across the groups in terms of residential energy security. If you need more information, please contact the corresponding author.

Here, we ran GCAM-USA with the multiple-consumer feature described above under four scenarios over 2015-2050 (Table 1), including two business-as-usual scenarios and two decarbonization scenarios (with and without the impacts of climate change on heating and cooling demand). This repository contains the full model output databases and key output variables related to the residential energy sector under the four scenarios, including:

• income shares by consumer groups at each state over 2015-2050 (Casper et al., 2023)
• residential energy consumption per capita by service, fuel, state, and income group, 2015-2050
• residential energy service output (energy consumption * technology efficiency) per capita by service, fuel, state, and income group, 2015-2050
• estimated energy burden (Eq.1), by state and income group, 2015-2050
• estimated satiation gap (Eq.2), by service, state, and income group, 2015-2050
• residential heating service inequality (Eq.3), by state, 2015-2050

Table 1

Eq. 1

\(Energy\ burden_{i,k} = \dfrac{\sum_j (service\ output_{i,j,k} * service\ cost_{j,k})}{GDP_{i,k}}\)

for income group i and state k, that sums over all residential energy services j.

Eq. 2

\(Satiation\ Gap_{i,j,k} = \dfrac{satiation\ level_{j,k} - service\ output_{i,j,k}} {satiation\ level_{j,k}}\)

for service j, income group i, and state k. Note that the satiation level and service output are per unit of floorspace.

Eq. 3

\(Residential\ heating\ service\ inequality_j = \dfrac{S_j^{d10}}{(S_j^{d1} +S_j^{d2} + S_j^{d3} + S_j^{d4})}\)

for service j where S is the residential heating service output per capita of the highest income group (d10) divided by the sum of that of the lowest four income groups (d1, d2, d3, and d4), similar to the Palma ratio often used for measuring income inequality. A higher Palma ratio indicates a greater degree of inequality. Among the key output variables in this repository, we provide the residential heating service inequality output table as an example.

Reference

Casper, K. C., Narayan, K. B., O'Neill, B. C., Waldhoff, S. T., Zhang, Y., & Wejnert-Depue, C. (2023). Non-parametric projections of the net-income distribution for all U.S. states for the shared socioeconomic pathways. Environmental Research Letters. http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/acf9b8.

IAMC. 2022. The common Integrated Assessment Model (IAM) documentation [Online]. Integrated Assessment Consortium. Available: https://www.iamcdocumentation.eu/index.php/IAMC_wiki [Accessed May 2023].

Acknowledgement

This research was supported by the Grid Operations, Decarbonization, Environmental and Energy Equity Platform (GODEEEP) Investment, under the Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) Program at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL).

PNNL is a multi-program national laboratory operated for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) by Battelle Memorial Institute under Contract No. DE-AC05-76RL01830.

The United States electric grid, a vast and complex infrastructure, has experienced numerous outages from 2002 to 2023, with causes ranging from extreme weather events to cyberattacks and aging infrastructure. The resilience of the grid has been tested repeatedly as demand for electricity continues to grow while climate change exacerbates the frequency and intensity of storms, wildfires, and other natural disasters.

Between 2002 and 2023, the U.S. Department of Energy recorded thousands of power outages, varying in scale from localized blackouts to large-scale regional failures affecting millions. The Northeast blackout of 2003 was one of the most significant, impacting 50 million people across the United States and Canada. A software bug in an alarm system prevented operators from recognizing and responding to transmission line failures, leading to a cascading effect that took hours to contain and days to restore completely.

Weather-related disruptions have been among the most common causes of outages, particularly hurricanes, ice storms, and heatwaves. In 2005, Hurricane Katrina devastated the Gulf Coast, knocking out power for over 1.7 million customers. Similarly, in 2012, Hurricane Sandy caused widespread destruction in the Northeast, leaving over 8 million customers in the dark. More recently, the Texas winter storm of February 2021 resulted in one of the most catastrophic power failures in state history. Unusually cold temperatures overwhelmed the state’s independent power grid, leading to equipment failures, frozen natural gas pipelines, and rolling blackouts that lasted days. The event highlighted vulnerabilities in grid preparedness for extreme weather, particularly in regions unaccustomed to such conditions.

Wildfires in California have also played a significant role in grid outages. The state's largest utility companies, such as Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E), have implemented preemptive power shutoffs to reduce wildfire risks during high-wind events. These Public Safety Power Shutoffs (PSPS) have affected millions of residents, causing disruptions to businesses, emergency services, and daily life. The 2018 Camp Fire, the deadliest and most destructive wildfire in California history, was ignited by faulty PG&E transmission lines, leading to increased scrutiny over utility maintenance and fire mitigation efforts.

In addition to natural disasters, cyber threats have emerged as a growing concern for the U.S. electric grid. In 2015 and 2016, Russian-linked cyberattacks targeted Ukraine’s power grid, serving as a stark warning of the potential vulnerabilities in American infrastructure. In 2021, the Colonial Pipeline ransomware attack, while not directly targeting the electric grid, demonstrated how critical energy infrastructure could be compromised, leading to widespread fuel shortages and economic disruptions. Federal agencies and utility companies have since ramped up investments in cybersecurity measures to protect against potential attacks.

Aging infrastructure remains another pressing issue. Many parts of the U.S. grid were built decades ago and have not kept pace with modern energy demands or technological advancements. The shift towards renewable energy sources, such as solar and wind, presents new challenges for grid stability, requiring updated transmission systems and improved energy storage solutions. Federal and state governments have initiated grid modernization efforts, including investments in smart grids, microgrids, and battery storage to enhance resilience and reliability.

Looking forward, the future of the U.S. electric grid depends on continued investments in infrastructure, cybersecurity, and climate resilience. With the increasing electrification of transportation and industry, demand for reliable and clean energy will only grow. Policymakers, utility companies, and regulators must collaborate to address vulnerabilities, adapt to emerging threats, and ensure a more robust, efficient, and sustainable electric grid for the decades to come.

PUDL v2025.2.0 Data Release

This is our regular quarterly release for 2025Q1. It includes updates to all the datasets that are published with quarterly or higher frequency, plus initial verisons of a few new data sources that have been in the works for a while.

One major change this quarter is that we are now publishing all processed PUDL data as Apache Parquet files, alongside our existing SQLite databases. See Data Access for more on how to access these outputs.

Some potentially breaking changes to be aware of:

In the EIA Form 930 – Hourly and Daily Balancing Authority Operations Report a number of new energy sources have been added, and some old energy sources have been split into more granular categories. See Changes in energy source granularity over time.

We are now running the EPA’s CAMD to EIA unit crosswalk code for each individual year starting from 2018, rather than just 2018 and 2021, resulting in more connections between these two datasets and changes to some sub-plant IDs. See the note below for more details.

Many thanks to the organizations who make these regular updates possible! Especially GridLab, RMI, and the ZERO Lab at Princeton University. If you rely on PUDL and would like to help ensure that the data keeps flowing, please consider joining them as a PUDL Sustainer, as we are still fundraising for 2025.

New Data

EIA 176

Add a couple of semi-transformed interim EIA-176 (natural gas sources and dispositions) tables. They aren’t yet being written to the database, but are one step closer. See #3555 and PRs #3590, #3978. Thanks to @davidmudrauskas for moving this dataset forward.

Extracted these interim tables up through the latest 2023 data release. See #4002 and #4004.

EIA 860

Added EIA 860 Multifuel table. See #3438 and #3946.

FERC 1

Added three new output tables containing granular utility accounting data. See #4057, #3642 and the table descriptions in the data dictionary:

out_ferc1_yearly_detailed_income_statements

out_ferc1_yearly_detailed_balance_sheet_assets

out_ferc1_yearly_detailed_balance_sheet_liabilities

SEC Form 10-K Parent-Subsidiary Ownership

We have added some new tables describing the parent-subsidiary company ownership relationships reported in the SEC’s Form 10-K, Exhibit 21 “Subsidiaries of the Registrant”. Where possible these tables link the SEC filers or their subsidiary companies to the corresponding EIA utilities. This work was funded by a grant from the Mozilla Foundation. Most of the ML models and data preparation took place in the mozilla-sec-eia repository separate from the main PUDL ETL, as it requires processing hundreds of thousands of PDFs and the deployment of some ML experiment tracking infrastructure. The new tables are handed off as nearly finished products to the PUDL ETL pipeline. Note that these are preliminary, experimental data products and are known to be incomplete and to contain errors. Extracting data tables from unstructured PDFs and the SEC to EIA record linkage are necessarily probabalistic processes.

See PRs #4026, #4031, #4035, #4046, #4048, #4050 and check out the table descriptions in the PUDL data dictionary:

out_sec10k_parents_and_subsidiaries

core_sec10k_quarterly_filings

core_sec10k_quarterly_exhibit_21_company_ownership

core_sec10k_quarterly_company_information

Expanded Data Coverage

EPA CEMS

Added 2024 Q4 of CEMS data. See #4041 and #4052.

EPA CAMD EIA Crosswalk

In the past, the crosswalk in PUDL has used the EPA’s published crosswalk (run with 2018 data), and an additional crosswalk we ran with 2021 EIA 860 data. To ensure that the crosswalk reflects updates in both EIA and EPA data, we re-ran the EPA R code which generates the EPA CAMD EIA crosswalk with 4 new years of data: 2019, 2020, 2022 and 2023. Re-running the crosswalk pulls the latest data from the CAMD FACT API, which results in some changes to the generator and unit IDs reported on the EPA side of the crosswalk, which feeds into the creation of core_epa_assn_eia_epacamd.

The changes only result in the addition of new units and generators in the EPA data, with no changes to matches at the plant level. However, the updates to generator and unit IDs have resulted in changes to the subplant IDs - some EIA boilers and generators which previously had no matches to EPA data have now been matched to EPA unit data, resulting in an overall reduction in the number of rows in the core_epa_assn_eia_epacamd_subplant_ids table. See issues #4039 and PR #4056 for a discussion of the changes observed in the course of this update.

EIA 860M

Added EIA 860m through December 2024. See #4038 and #4047.

EIA 923

Added EIA 923 monthly data through September 2024. See #4038 and #4047.

EIA Bulk Electricity Data

Updated the EIA Bulk Electricity data to include data published up through 2024-11-01. See #4042 and PR #4051.

EIA 930

Updated the EIA 930 data to include data published up through the beginning of February 2025. See #4040 and PR #4054. 10 new energy sources were added and 3 were retired; see Changes in energy source granularity over time for more information.

Bug Fixes

Fix an accidentally swapped set of starting balance / ending balance column rename parameters in the pre-2021 DBF derived data that feeds into core_ferc1_yearly_other_regulatory_liabilities_sched278. See issue #3952 and PRs #3969, #3979. Thanks to @yolandazzz13 for making this fix.

Added preliminary data validation checks for several FERC 1 tables that were missing it #3860.

Fix spelling of Lake Huron and Lake Saint Clair in out_vcerare_hourly_available_capacity_factor and related tables. See issue #4007 and PR #4029.

Quality of Life Improvements

We added a sources parameter to pudl.metadata.classes.DataSource.from_id() in order to make it possible to use the pudl-archiver repository to archive datasets that won’t necessarily be ingested into PUDL. See this PUDL archiver issue and PRs #4003 and #4013.

Other PUDL v2025.2.0 Resources

PUDL v2025.2.0 Data Dictionary

PUDL v2025.2.0 Documentation

PUDL in the AWS Open Data Registry

PUDL v2025.2.0 in a free, public AWS S3 bucket: s3://pudl.catalyst.coop/v2025.2.0/

PUDL v2025.2.0 in a requester-pays GCS bucket: gs://pudl.catalyst.coop/v2025.2.0/

Zenodo archive of the PUDL GitHub repo for this release

PUDL v2025.2.0 release on GitHub

PUDL v2025.2.0 package in the Python Package Index (PyPI)

Contact Us

If you're using PUDL, we would love to hear from you! Even if it's just a note to let us know that you exist, and how you're using the software or data. Here's a bunch of different ways to get in touch:

Follow us on GitHub

Use the PUDL Github issue tracker to let us know about any bugs or data issues you encounter

GitHub Discussions is where we provide user support.

Watch our GitHub Project to see what we're working on.

Email us at hello@catalyst.coop for private communications.

On Mastodon: @CatalystCoop@mastodon.energy

On BlueSky: @catalyst.coop

On Twitter: @CatalystCoop

Connect with us on LinkedIn

Play with our data and notebooks on Kaggle

Combine our data with ML models on HuggingFace

Learn more about us on our website: https://catalyst.coop

Subscribe to our announcements list for email updates.

This dataset includes an aggregated and event-correlated analysis of power outages in the United States, synthesized by integrating three data sources: the Environment for the Analysis of Geo-Located Energy Information (EAGLE-I), the Electric Emergency Incident Disturbance Report (DOE-417), and Annual Estimates of the Resident Population for Counties 2024 (CO-EST2024-POP). The EAGLE-I dataset, spanning from 2014 to 2023, encompasses over 146 million customers and offers county-level outage information at 15-minute intervals. The data has been processed, filtered, and aggregated to deliver an enhanced perspective on power outages, which are then correlated with DOE-417 data based on geographic location as well as the start and end times of events. For each major disturbance documented in DOE-417, essential metrics are defined to quantify the outages associated with the event. This dataset supports researchers in examining outages triggered by major disturbances like extreme weather and physical disruptions, thereby aiding studies on power system resilience. Links to the raw data for generating the correlated dataset are included below as "DOE-417", "EAGLE-I", and "CO-EST2024-POP" resources. Acknowledgement: This work is funded by the Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) as part of the Resilience Through Data-Driven, Intelligently Designed Control (RD2C) Initiative.

This dataset details fuel mileage and gallons/kilowatt hours for each agency, mode, and type of service (TOS) as reported by agencies submitted data to the National Transit Database (NTD) for the 2022 and 2023 report years. This file is based on the 2022 and 2023 Energy Consumption database files available at https://transit.dot.gov/ntd/ntd-data

Data Tables organize and summarize data from the 2022 and 2023 NTD in a manner that is more useful for quick reference and summary analysis.

Only Full Reporters report energy consumption. Other reporter types do not appear in this dataset. Demand Response Taxi (DR/TX) mode and type of service combination does not report energy consumption and does not appear in this dataset. Finally, Non-dedicated fleets report energy consumption but not miles traveled. Thus for some agencies the given data for miles traveled are incomplete. Non-dedicated fleets represent about 7% of the data reflected in this dataset.

In versions of the data tables from 2014-2021, you can find data on fuel and energy in the file called "Fuel and Energy" available from the NTD program website.

Over the past half a century, the world's electricity consumption has continuously grown, reaching approximately 27,000 terawatt-hours by 2023. Between 1980 and 2023, electricity consumption more than tripled, while the global population reached eight billion people. Growth in industrialization and electricity access across the globe have further boosted electricity demand. China's economic rise and growth in global power use Since 2000, China's GDP has recorded an astonishing 15-fold increase, turning it into the second-largest global economy, behind only the United States. To fuel the development of its billion-strong population and various manufacturing industries, China requires more energy than any other country. As a result, it has become the largest electricity consumer in the world. Electricity consumption per capita In terms of per capita electricity consumption, China and other BRIC countries are still vastly outpaced by developed economies with smaller population sizes. Iceland, with a population of less than half a million inhabitants, consumes by far the most electricity per person in the world. Norway, Qatar, Canada, and the United States also have among the highest consumption rates. Multiple contributing factors such as the existence of power-intensive industries, household sizes, living situations, appliance and efficiency standards, and access to alternative heating fuels determine the amount of electricity the average person requires in each country.

WIND Toolkit Long-term Ensemble Dataset (WTK-LED), an updated version of the meteorological WIND Toolkit, is a meteorological dataset providing high-resolution time series, including interannual variability and model uncertainty of wind speed at every modeling grid point to indicate ranges of possible wind speeds. The data were produced using the Weather Research and Forecasting Model (WRF). The vertical grid used in WTK-LED includes many vertical layers in the atmospheric boundary layer to provide information of atmospheric quantities across the rotor layer of utility scale and distributed wind turbines. The WTK-LED includes: (1) Numerical simulations of wind speed and other meteorological variables covering the contiguous United States (CONUS) and Alaska, with high-resolution (5-minute [min], 2-kilometer [km]) data for 3 years (2018-2020): WTK-LED CONUS, WTK-LED Alaska. (2) Climate simulations from Argonne National Laboratory covering North America, including Alaska, Canada, and most of Mexico and the Caribbean islands. These simulations complement the new WTK-LED to offer a 4-km, hourly dataset covering 20 years (2001-2020): WTK-LED Climate. (3) Specific long-term, high-resolution offshore simulations have been conducted separately for the U.S. coasts, Hawaii, and the Great Lakes, leading to the 2023 National Offshore Wind dataset: NOW-23. The data for Hawaii include land-based data and are part of WTK-LED Hawaii. Because the accuracy of simulations from a mesoscale model, such as WRF, varies depending on the location and weather situation, and can reach up to several m/s for wind speed, we provide simulated wind speed uncertainty estimates to the community to be used in conjunction with the deterministic model simulations. This dataset was developed to satisfy a wide group of stakeholders across various wind energy disciplines, including but not limited to stakeholders in the distributed and utility scale wind industry, the new emerging airborne wind energy field, grid integration, power systems modeling, environmental modeling, and researchers in academia, and to close some of the gaps that current public datasets have. Based on our validation results to date, we suggest use cases and applications for each dataset of the WTK-LED as shown in "WTK-LED Use Cases" resource below.

Local Law 84 of 2009 (LL84) requires annual energy and water benchmarking data to be submitted by owners of buildings with more than 50,000 square feet. This data is collected via the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Portfolio Manager website Each property is identified by it's EPA assigned property ID, and can contain one or more tax lots identified by one or more BBLs (Borough, Block, Lot) or one or more buildings identified by one or more building identification numbers (BIN) Please visit DOB's Benchmarking and Energy Efficiency Rating page for additional information.

Over 4,400 large scale commercial solar facilities are in operation in the United States as of December, 2021, representing over 60 gigawatts of electric power capacity; of these, over 3,900 are ground-mounted with capacities of 1MW or more, specified as large scale solar photovoltaic (LSPV) facilities. LSPV ground-mounted installations continue to grow, with over 400 projects coming online in 2021 alone. Currently, a comprehensive, publicly available georectified data describing the locations and spatial footprints of these facilities does not exist. Analysts from the US Geological Survey and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory collaborated to develop and release the United States Large Scale Solar Photovoltaic Database (USPVDB). This effort built from the expertise gained while developing the regularly updated United States Wind Turbine Database (USWTDB). Starting from Energy Information Administration (EIA) data, locations of LSPV facilities were visually verified using high-resolution aerial imagery; a polygon was drawn around the extent of facility panel arrays, and facility attributes were appended. Quality assurance and control were achieved via team peer review, and comparing the USPVDB to other datasets of US PV. The data are available in several formats, including an interactive web application, comma-separated value spreadsheet (CSV), application programming interface (API), and a shapefile. The data are available for use by academic researchers, engineers and developers from PV companies, government agencies, planners, educators, and the general public.

The 2023 National Offshore Wind data set (NOW-23) is the latest wind resource data set for offshore regions in the United States, which supersedes, for its offshore component, the Wind Integration National Dataset (WIND) Toolkit, which was published about a decade ago and is currently one of the primary resources for stakeholders conducting wind resource assessments in the continental United States. The NOW-23 data set was produced using the Weather Research and Forecasting Model (WRF) version 4.2.1. A regional approach was used: for each offshore region, the WRF setup was selected based on validation against available observations. The WRF model was initialized with the European Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasts 5 Reanalysis (ERA-5) data set, using a 6-hour refresh rate. The model is configured with an initial horizontal grid spacing of 6 km and an internal nested domain that refined the spatial resolution to 2 km. The model is run with 61 vertical levels, with 12 levels in the lower 300m of the atmosphere, stretching from 5 m to 45 m in height. The MYNN planetary boundary layer and surface layer schemes were used the North Atlantic, Mid Atlantic, Great Lakes, Hawaii, and North Pacific regions. On the other hand, using the YSU planetary boundary layer and MM5 surface layer schemes resulted in a better skill in the South Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico, and South Pacific regions. A more detailed description of the WRF model setup can be found in the WRF namelist files linked at the bottom of this page. For all regions, the NOW-23 data set coverage starts on January 1, 2000. For Hawaii and the North Pacific regions, NOW-23 goes until December 31, 2019. For the South Pacific region, the model goes until 31 December, 2022. For all other regions, the model covers until December 31, 2020. Outputs are available at 5 minute resolution, and for all regions we have also included output files at hourly resolution. The NOW-23 data are provided here as HDF5 files. Examples of how to use the HSDS Service to Access the NOW-23 files are linked below. A list of the variables included in the NOW-23 files is also linked below. No filters have been applied to the raw WRF output.

About this dataset

Context

The dataset tabulates the Energy population distribution across 18 age groups. It lists the population in each age group along with the percentage population relative of the total population for Energy. The dataset can be utilized to understand the population distribution of Energy by age. For example, using this dataset, we can identify the largest age group in Energy.

Key observations

The largest age group in Energy, IL was for the group of age 70 to 74 years years with a population of 140 (11.96%), according to the ACS 2019-2023 5-Year Estimates. At the same time, the smallest age group in Energy, IL was the 25 to 29 years years with a population of 35 (2.99%). Source: U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2019-2023 5-Year Estimates

Content

When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2019-2023 5-Year Estimates

Age groups:

• Under 5 years
• 5 to 9 years
• 10 to 14 years
• 15 to 19 years
• 20 to 24 years
• 25 to 29 years
• 30 to 34 years
• 35 to 39 years
• 40 to 44 years
• 45 to 49 years
• 50 to 54 years
• 55 to 59 years
• 60 to 64 years
• 65 to 69 years
• 70 to 74 years
• 75 to 79 years
• 80 to 84 years
• 85 years and over

Variables / Data Columns

• Age Group: This column displays the age group in consideration
• Population: The population for the specific age group in the Energy is shown in this column.
• % of Total Population: This column displays the population of each age group as a proportion of Energy total population. Please note that the sum of all percentages may not equal one due to rounding of values.

Good to know

Margin of Error

Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.

Custom data

If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.

Inspiration

Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.

Recommended for further research

This dataset is a part of the main dataset for Energy Population by Age. You can refer the same here

China Total Energy Consumption data was reported at 161.897 BTU qn in 2023. This records an increase from the previous number of 153.520 BTU qn for 2022. China Total Energy Consumption data is updated yearly, averaging 44.216 BTU qn from Dec 1980 (Median) to 2023, with 44 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 161.897 BTU qn in 2023 and a record low of 18.508 BTU qn in 1981. China Total Energy Consumption data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by U.S. Energy Information Administration. The data is categorized under Global Database’s China – Table CN.EIA.IES: Energy Production and Consumption: Annual.

Global primary energy consumption has increased dramatically in recent years and is projected to continue to increase until 2045. Only hydropower and renewable energy consumption are expected to increase between 2045 and 2050 and reach 30 percent of the global energy consumption. Energy consumption by country The distribution of energy consumption globally is disproportionately high among some countries. China, the United States, and India were by far the largest consumers of primary energy globally. On a per capita basis, it was Qatar, Singapore, the United Arab Emirates, and Iceland to have the highest per capita energy consumption. Renewable energy consumption Over the last two decades, renewable energy consumption has increased to reach over 90 exajoules in 2023. Among all countries globally, China had the largest installed renewable energy capacity as of that year, followed by the United States.

About this dataset

Context

The dataset tabulates the Energy population over the last 20 plus years. It lists the population for each year, along with the year on year change in population, as well as the change in percentage terms for each year. The dataset can be utilized to understand the population change of Energy across the last two decades. For example, using this dataset, we can identify if the population is declining or increasing. If there is a change, when the population peaked, or if it is still growing and has not reached its peak. We can also compare the trend with the overall trend of United States population over the same period of time.

Key observations

In 2023, the population of Energy was 953, a 0.10% decrease year-by-year from 2022. Previously, in 2022, Energy population was 954, a decline of 0.83% compared to a population of 962 in 2021. Over the last 20 plus years, between 2000 and 2023, population of Energy decreased by 203. In this period, the peak population was 1,189 in the year 2009. The numbers suggest that the population has already reached its peak and is showing a trend of decline. Source: U.S. Census Bureau Population Estimates Program (PEP).

Content

When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau Population Estimates Program (PEP).

Data Coverage:

• From 2000 to 2023

Variables / Data Columns

• Year: This column displays the data year (Measured annually and for years 2000 to 2023)
• Population: The population for the specific year for the Energy is shown in this column.
• Year on Year Change: This column displays the change in Energy population for each year compared to the previous year.
• Change in Percent: This column displays the year on year change as a percentage. Please note that the sum of all percentages may not equal one due to rounding of values.

Good to know

Margin of Error

Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.

Custom data

If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.

Inspiration

Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.

Recommended for further research

This dataset is a part of the main dataset for Energy Population by Year. You can refer the same here