100+ datasets found
  1. ACS Housing Costs Variables - Boundaries

    • covid-hub.gio.georgia.gov
    • opendata.suffolkcountyny.gov
    • +7more
    Updated Dec 12, 2018
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Esri (2018). ACS Housing Costs Variables - Boundaries [Dataset]. https://covid-hub.gio.georgia.gov/maps/9c7647840d6540e4864d205bac505027
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Dec 12, 2018
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Esrihttp://esri.com/
    Area covered
    Description

    This layer shows housing costs as a percentage of household income. This is shown by tract, county, and state boundaries. This service is updated annually to contain the most currently released American Community Survey (ACS) 5-year data, and contains estimates and margins of error. There are also additional calculated attributes related to this topic, which can be mapped or used within analysis. Income is based on earnings in past 12 months of survey. This layer is symbolized to show the percent of renter households that spend 30.0% or more of their household income on gross rent (contract rent plus tenant-paid utilities). To see the full list of attributes available in this service, go to the "Data" tab, and choose "Fields" at the top right. Current Vintage: 2019-2023ACS Table(s): B25070, B25091 Data downloaded from: Census Bureau's API for American Community Survey Date of API call: December 12, 2024National Figures: data.census.govThe United States Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS):About the SurveyGeography & ACSTechnical DocumentationNews & UpdatesThis ready-to-use layer can be used within ArcGIS Pro, ArcGIS Online, its configurable apps, dashboards, Story Maps, custom apps, and mobile apps. Data can also be exported for offline workflows. For more information about ACS layers, visit the FAQ. Please cite the Census and ACS when using this data.Data Note from the Census:Data are based on a sample and are subject to sampling variability. The degree of uncertainty for an estimate arising from sampling variability is represented through the use of a margin of error. The value shown here is the 90 percent margin of error. The margin of error can be interpreted as providing a 90 percent probability that the interval defined by the estimate minus the margin of error and the estimate plus the margin of error (the lower and upper confidence bounds) contains the true value. In addition to sampling variability, the ACS estimates are subject to nonsampling error (for a discussion of nonsampling variability, see Accuracy of the Data). The effect of nonsampling error is not represented in these tables.Data Processing Notes:This layer is updated automatically when the most current vintage of ACS data is released each year, usually in December. The layer always contains the latest available ACS 5-year estimates. It is updated annually within days of the Census Bureau's release schedule. Click here to learn more about ACS data releases.Boundaries come from the US Census TIGER geodatabases, specifically, the National Sub-State Geography Database (named tlgdb_(year)_a_us_substategeo.gdb). Boundaries are updated at the same time as the data updates (annually), and the boundary vintage appropriately matches the data vintage as specified by the Census. These are Census boundaries with water and/or coastlines erased for cartographic and mapping purposes. For census tracts, the water cutouts are derived from a subset of the 2020 Areal Hydrography boundaries offered by TIGER. Water bodies and rivers which are 50 million square meters or larger (mid to large sized water bodies) are erased from the tract level boundaries, as well as additional important features. For state and county boundaries, the water and coastlines are derived from the coastlines of the 2023 500k TIGER Cartographic Boundary Shapefiles. These are erased to more accurately portray the coastlines and Great Lakes. The original AWATER and ALAND fields are still available as attributes within the data table (units are square meters).The States layer contains 52 records - all US states, Washington D.C., and Puerto RicoCensus tracts with no population that occur in areas of water, such as oceans, are removed from this data service (Census Tracts beginning with 99).Percentages and derived counts, and associated margins of error, are calculated values (that can be identified by the "_calc_" stub in the field name), and abide by the specifications defined by the American Community Survey.Field alias names were created based on the Table Shells file available from the American Community Survey Summary File Documentation page.Negative values (e.g., -4444...) have been set to null, with the exception of -5555... which has been set to zero. These negative values exist in the raw API data to indicate the following situations:The margin of error column indicates that either no sample observations or too few sample observations were available to compute a standard error and thus the margin of error. A statistical test is not appropriate.Either no sample observations or too few sample observations were available to compute an estimate, or a ratio of medians cannot be calculated because one or both of the median estimates falls in the lowest interval or upper interval of an open-ended distribution.The median falls in the lowest interval of an open-ended distribution, or in the upper interval of an open-ended distribution. A statistical test is not appropriate.The estimate is controlled. A statistical test for sampling variability is not appropriate.The data for this geographic area cannot be displayed because the number of sample cases is too small.

  2. a

    Housing Cost Burden by Race

    • data-seattlecitygis.opendata.arcgis.com
    • data.seattle.gov
    • +3more
    Updated Oct 8, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    City of Seattle ArcGIS Online (2024). Housing Cost Burden by Race [Dataset]. https://data-seattlecitygis.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/SeattleCityGIS::housing-cost-burden-by-race/about
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Oct 8, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    City of Seattle ArcGIS Online
    License

    ODC Public Domain Dedication and Licence (PDDL) v1.0http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/pddl/1.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Displacement risk indicator showing how many households within the specified groups are facing either housing cost burden (contributing more than 30% of monthly income toward housing costs) or severe housing cost burden (contributing more than 50% of monthly income toward housing costs).

  3. d

    5.17 Total Cost of Risk (summary)

    • catalog.data.gov
    • safe-and-secure-communities-tempegov.hub.arcgis.com
    • +1more
    Updated Nov 15, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    City of Tempe (2025). 5.17 Total Cost of Risk (summary) [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/5-17-total-cost-of-risk-summary
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Nov 15, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    City of Tempe
    Description

    The Cost of Risk metric shows how much the city spends on handling risks (like insurance, legal expenses, or accident payouts) compared to how much money it collects overall.The following historical data was corrected:2022 cost of risk percent was corrected from 1.49 to 1.842023 cost of risk percent was corrected from 1.36 to 1.342024 cost of risk percent was corrected from 1.47 to 1.30 The performance measure dashboard is available at 5.17 Total Cost of Risk. Additional Information Source: Peoplesoft and ACFRContact: Laura CalderContact E-Mail: laura.calder@tempe.govData Source Type: ExcelPreparation Method: The total expenses in Fund 2661 (The Risk Management cost center) is divided by the total revenue from Annual Comprehensive Financial Report to calculate the total cost of Risk.Publish Frequency: AnnualPublish Method: Manual Data Dictionary (pending update)

  4. D

    Single-Family Home Sale Prices by Census Tract

    • data.seattle.gov
    • catalog.data.gov
    • +3more
    csv, xlsx, xml
    Updated Feb 3, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2025). Single-Family Home Sale Prices by Census Tract [Dataset]. https://data.seattle.gov/dataset/Single-Family-Home-Sale-Prices-by-Census-Tract/74h9-s2th
    Explore at:
    csv, xml, xlsxAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Feb 3, 2025
    Description

    Displacement risk indicator classifying census tracts according to single-family home sale prices in census tracts where at least 100 single-family homes exist. We classify arms-length transactions only along two dimensions:

    1. The median price of sales within the census tract for the specified year, balancing between nominal sale price and sale price per square foot.
    2. The change in median sale price (again balanced between nominal sale price and price per square foot) from the previous year.

  5. GIS Data Object Publishing instructions

    • catalog.data.gov
    • s.cnmilf.com
    Updated Sep 19, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Social Security Administration (2025). GIS Data Object Publishing instructions [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/gis-data-object-publishing-instructions
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Sep 19, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Social Security Administrationhttp://ssa.gov/
    Description

    Expands the use of internal data for creating Geographic Information System (GIS) maps. SSA's Database Systems division developed a map users guide for GIS data object publishing and was made available in an internal Sharepoint site for access throughout the agency. The guide acts as the reference for publishers of GIS objects across the life-cycle in our single, central geodatabase implementation.

  6. Digital Geologic-GIS Map of the Big Pine 15' Quadrangle, California (NPS,...

    • catalog.data.gov
    • s.cnmilf.com
    Updated Nov 25, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    National Park Service (2025). Digital Geologic-GIS Map of the Big Pine 15' Quadrangle, California (NPS, GRD, GRI, SEKI, BIGP digital map) adapted from a U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper map by Bateman, Pakiser and Kane (1965) [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/digital-geologic-gis-map-of-the-big-pine-15-quadrangle-california-nps-grd-gri-seki-bigp-di
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Nov 25, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    National Park Servicehttp://www.nps.gov/
    Area covered
    California, Big Pine
    Description

    The Digital Geologic-GIS Map of the Big Pine 15' Quadrangle, California is composed of GIS data layers and GIS tables, and is available in the following GRI-supported GIS data formats: 1.) a 10.1 file geodatabase (bigp_geology.gdb), and a 2.) Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) geopackage. The file geodatabase format is supported with a 1.) ArcGIS Pro map file (.mapx) file (bigp_geology.mapx) and individual Pro layer (.lyrx) files (for each GIS data layer), as well as with a 2.) 10.1 ArcMap (.mxd) map document (bigp_geology.mxd) and individual 10.1 layer (.lyr) files (for each GIS data layer). Upon request, the GIS data is also available in ESRI 10.1 shapefile format. Contact Stephanie O'Meara (see contact information below) to acquire the GIS data in these GIS data formats. In addition to the GIS data and supporting GIS files, three additional files comprise a GRI digital geologic-GIS dataset or map: 1.) A GIS readme file (seki_manz_geology_gis_readme.pdf), 2.) the GRI ancillary map information document (.pdf) file (seki_manz_geology.pdf) which contains geologic unit descriptions, as well as other ancillary map information and graphics from the source map(s) used by the GRI in the production of the GRI digital geologic-GIS data for the park, and 3.) a user-friendly FAQ PDF version of the metadata (bigp_geology_metadata_faq.pdf). Please read the seki_manz_geology_gis_readme.pdf for information pertaining to the proper extraction of the GIS data and other map files. QGIS software is available for free at: https://www.qgis.org/en/site/. The data were completed as a component of the Geologic Resources Inventory (GRI) program, a National Park Service (NPS) Inventory and Monitoring (I&M) Division funded program that is administered by the NPS Geologic Resources Division (GRD). For a complete listing of GRI products visit the GRI publications webpage: For a complete listing of GRI products visit the GRI publications webpage: https://www.nps.gov/subjects/geology/geologic-resources-inventory-products.htm. For more information about the Geologic Resources Inventory Program visit the GRI webpage: https://www.nps.gov/subjects/geology/gri,htm. At the bottom of that webpage is a "Contact Us" link if you need additional information. You may also directly contact the program coordinator, Jason Kenworthy (jason_kenworthy@nps.gov). Source geologic maps and data used to complete this GRI digital dataset were provided by the following: U.S. Geological Survey. Detailed information concerning the sources used and their contribution the GRI product are listed in the Source Citation section(s) of this metadata record (bigp_geology_metadata.txt or bigp_geology_metadata_faq.pdf). Users of this data are cautioned about the locational accuracy of features within this dataset. Based on the source map scale of 1:62,500 and United States National Map Accuracy Standards features are within (horizontally) 31.8 meters or 104.2 feet of their actual location as presented by this dataset. Users of this data should thus not assume the location of features is exactly where they are portrayed in ArcGIS, QGIS or other software used to display this dataset. All GIS and ancillary tables were produced as per the NPS GRI Geology-GIS Geodatabase Data Model v. 2.3. (available at: https://www.nps.gov/articles/gri-geodatabase-model.htm).

  7. Digital Surficial Geologic-GIS Map of the Big Thicket National Preserve...

    • catalog.data.gov
    • s.cnmilf.com
    Updated Nov 25, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    National Park Service (2025). Digital Surficial Geologic-GIS Map of the Big Thicket National Preserve Area, Texas (NPS, GRD, GRI, BITH, BTAM_surficial digital map) adapted from a Texas Water Development Board Geologic Database of Texas map by Texas Water Development Board (2007) [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/digital-surficial-geologic-gis-map-of-the-big-thicket-national-preserve-area-texas-nps-grd
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Nov 25, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    National Park Servicehttp://www.nps.gov/
    Area covered
    Texas
    Description

    The Digital Surficial Geologic-GIS Map of the Big Thicket National Preserve Area, Texas is composed of GIS data layers and GIS tables, and is available in the following GRI-supported GIS data formats: 1.) an ESRI file geodatabase (btam_surficial_geology.gdb), a 2.) Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) geopackage, and 3.) 2.2 KMZ/KML file for use in Google Earth, however, this format version of the map is limited in data layers presented and in access to GRI ancillary table information. The file geodatabase format is supported with a 1.) ArcGIS Pro map file (.mapx) file (btam_surficial_geology.mapx) and individual Pro layer (.lyrx) files (for each GIS data layer). The OGC geopackage is supported with a QGIS project (.qgz) file. Upon request, the GIS data is also available in ESRI shapefile format. Contact Stephanie O'Meara (see contact information below) to acquire the GIS data in these GIS data formats. In addition to the GIS data and supporting GIS files, three additional files comprise a GRI digital geologic-GIS dataset or map: 1.) a readme file (bith_geology_gis_readme.pdf), 2.) the GRI ancillary map information document (.pdf) file (bith_geology.pdf) which contains geologic unit descriptions, as well as other ancillary map information and graphics from the source map(s) used by the GRI in the production of the GRI digital geologic-GIS data for the park, and 3.) a user-friendly FAQ PDF version of the metadata (btam_surficial_geology_metadata_faq.pdf). Please read the bith_geology_gis_readme.pdf for information pertaining to the proper extraction of the GIS data and other map files. Google Earth software is available for free at: https://www.google.com/earth/versions/. QGIS software is available for free at: https://www.qgis.org/en/site/. Users are encouraged to only use the Google Earth data for basic visualization, and to use the GIS data for any type of data analysis or investigation. The data were completed as a component of the Geologic Resources Inventory (GRI) program, a National Park Service (NPS) Inventory and Monitoring (I&M) Division funded program that is administered by the NPS Geologic Resources Division (GRD). For a complete listing of GRI products visit the GRI publications webpage: https://www.nps.gov/subjects/geology/geologic-resources-inventory-products.htm. For more information about the Geologic Resources Inventory Program visit the GRI webpage: https://www.nps.gov/subjects/geology/gri.htm. At the bottom of that webpage is a "Contact Us" link if you need additional information. You may also directly contact the program coordinator, Jason Kenworthy (jason_kenworthy@nps.gov). Source geologic maps and data used to complete this GRI digital dataset were provided by the following: Texas Water Development Board. Detailed information concerning the sources used and their contribution the GRI product are listed in the Source Citation section(s) of this metadata record (btam_surficial_geology_metadata.txt or btam_surficial_geology_metadata_faq.pdf). Users of this data are cautioned about the locational accuracy of features within this dataset. Based on the source map scale of 1:250,000 and United States National Map Accuracy Standards features are within (horizontally) 127 meters or 416.7 feet of their actual location as presented by this dataset. Users of this data should thus not assume the location of features is exactly where they are portrayed in Google Earth, ArcGIS Pro, QGIS or other software used to display this dataset. All GIS and ancillary tables were produced as per the NPS GRI Geology-GIS Geodatabase Data Model v. 2.3. (available at: https://www.nps.gov/articles/gri-geodatabase-model.htm).

  8. f

    Geomorphology model (ArcGIS Pro version), input datasets and legend...

    • uvaauas.figshare.com
    • data.niaid.nih.gov
    zip
    Updated Jun 2, 2023
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Matheus G.G. De Jong; Henk Pieter Sterk; Stacy Shinneman; A.C. Seijmonsbergen (2023). Geomorphology model (ArcGIS Pro version), input datasets and legend symbology files [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.21942/uva.13693702.v20
    Explore at:
    zipAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 2, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    University of Amsterdam / Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences
    Authors
    Matheus G.G. De Jong; Henk Pieter Sterk; Stacy Shinneman; A.C. Seijmonsbergen
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    For complete collection of data and models, see https://doi.org/10.21942/uva.c.5290546.Original model developed in 2016-17 in ArcGIS by Henk Pieter Sterk (www.rfase.org), with minor updates in 2021 by Stacy Shinneman and Henk Pieter Sterk. Model used to generate publication results:Hierarchical geomorphological mapping in mountainous areas Matheus G.G. De Jong, Henk Pieter Sterk, Stacy Shinneman & Arie C. Seijmonsbergen. Submitted to Journal of Maps 2020, revisions made in 2021.This model creates tiers (columns) of geomorphological features (Tier 1, Tier 2 and Tier 3) in the landscape of Vorarlberg, Austria, each with an increasing level of detail. The input dataset needed to create this 'three-tier-legend' is a geomorphological map of Vorarlberg with a Tier 3 category (e.g. 1111, for glacially eroded bedrock). The model then automatically adds Tier 1, Tier 2 and Tier 3 categories based on the Tier 3 code in the 'Geomorph' field. The model replaces the input file with an updated shapefile of the geomorphology of Vorarlberg, now including three tiers of geomorphological features. Python script files and .lyr symbology files are also provided here.

  9. a

    Gas Prices, All Years

    • dcra-cdo-dcced.opendata.arcgis.com
    • gis.data.alaska.gov
    • +5more
    Updated Sep 4, 2019
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Dept. of Commerce, Community, & Economic Development (2019). Gas Prices, All Years [Dataset]. https://dcra-cdo-dcced.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/gas-prices-all-years
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Sep 4, 2019
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Dept. of Commerce, Community, & Economic Development
    Area covered
    Description

    Beginning in 2005, the Division of Community and Regional Affairs began collecting prices of heating fuel and unleaded gasoline in 100 select communities. The communities have remained constant since the project’s inception. The prices for unleaded gasoline in these 100 communities are collected via a telephone survey of each fuel retailer and reflect an “at the pump” price per gallon (including tax) on the day of contact. The survey is generally conducted once during the summer and once during the winter in any given year.

  10. Digital Geologic-GIS Map of Big Cypress National Preserve and Vicinity,...

    • catalog.data.gov
    • datasets.ai
    • +1more
    Updated Nov 25, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    National Park Service (2025). Digital Geologic-GIS Map of Big Cypress National Preserve and Vicinity, Florida (NPS, GRD, GRI, BICY, BICY digital map) adapted from a Florida Geological Survey Open-File Report map by Scott (2001) and FGS Bulletin map by Arthur et. al. (2005), U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Reports by Causaras, Reese and Cunningham (1985, 1986 and 2000), and Earthfx Incorporated/BEM Systems Inc. unpublished digital data by Wexler (2004) [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/digital-geologic-gis-map-of-big-cypress-national-preserve-and-vicinity-florida-nps-grd-gri
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Nov 25, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    National Park Servicehttp://www.nps.gov/
    Area covered
    Florida, Big Cypress
    Description

    The Digital Geologic-GIS Map of Big Cypress National Preserve and Vicinity, Florida is composed of GIS data layers and GIS tables, and is available in the following GRI-supported GIS data formats: 1.) a 10.1 file geodatabase (bicy_geology.gdb), a 2.) Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) geopackage, and 3.) 2.2 KMZ/KML file for use in Google Earth, however, this format version of the map is limited in data layers presented and in access to GRI ancillary table information. The file geodatabase format is supported with a 1.) ArcGIS Pro map file (.mapx) file (bicy_geology.mapx) and individual Pro layer (.lyrx) files (for each GIS data layer), as well as with a 2.) 10.1 ArcMap (.mxd) map document (bicy_geology.mxd) and individual 10.1 layer (.lyr) files (for each GIS data layer). The OGC geopackage is supported with a QGIS project (.qgz) file. Upon request, the GIS data is also available in ESRI 10.1 shapefile format. Contact Stephanie O'Meara (see contact information below) to acquire the GIS data in these GIS data formats. In addition to the GIS data and supporting GIS files, three additional files comprise a GRI digital geologic-GIS dataset or map: 1.) A GIS readme file (bicy_geology_gis_readme.pdf), 2.) the GRI ancillary map information document (.pdf) file (bicy_geology.pdf) which contains geologic unit descriptions, as well as other ancillary map information and graphics from the source map(s) used by the GRI in the production of the GRI digital geologic-GIS data for the park, and 3.) a user-friendly FAQ PDF version of the metadata (bicy_geology_metadata_faq.pdf). Please read the bicy_geology_gis_readme.pdf for information pertaining to the proper extraction of the GIS data and other map files. Google Earth software is available for free at: https://www.google.com/earth/versions/. QGIS software is available for free at: https://www.qgis.org/en/site/. Users are encouraged to only use the Google Earth data for basic visualization, and to use the GIS data for any type of data analysis or investigation. The data were completed as a component of the Geologic Resources Inventory (GRI) program, a National Park Service (NPS) Inventory and Monitoring (I&M) Division funded program that is administered by the NPS Geologic Resources Division (GRD). For a complete listing of GRI products visit the GRI publications webpage: For a complete listing of GRI products visit the GRI publications webpage: https://www.nps.gov/subjects/geology/geologic-resources-inventory-products.htm. For more information about the Geologic Resources Inventory Program visit the GRI webpage: https://www.nps.gov/subjects/geology/gri,htm. At the bottom of that webpage is a "Contact Us" link if you need additional information. You may also directly contact the program coordinator, Jason Kenworthy (jason_kenworthy@nps.gov). Source geologic maps and data used to complete this GRI digital dataset were provided by the following: Florida Geological Survey, U.S. Geological Survey and Earthfx Incorporated/BEM Systems Inc.. Detailed information concerning the sources used and their contribution the GRI product are listed in the Source Citation section(s) of this metadata record (bicy_geology_metadata.txt or bicy_geology_metadata_faq.pdf). Users of this data are cautioned about the locational accuracy of features within this dataset. Based on the source map scale of 1:675,000 and United States National Map Accuracy Standards features are within (horizontally) 342.9 meters or 1125 feet of their actual location as presented by this dataset. Users of this data should thus not assume the location of features is exactly where they are portrayed in Google Earth, ArcGIS, QGIS or other software used to display this dataset. All GIS and ancillary tables were produced as per the NPS GRI Geology-GIS Geodatabase Data Model v. 2.3. (available at: https://www.nps.gov/articles/gri-geodatabase-model.htm).

  11. c

    Water Balance App

    • resilience.climate.gov
    • caribbeangeoportal.com
    • +12more
    Updated Sep 29, 2017
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Esri (2017). Water Balance App [Dataset]. https://resilience.climate.gov/datasets/esri::water-balance-app
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Sep 29, 2017
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Esri
    Description

    Click anywhere on earth to see how the water balance is changing over time. This app is based on data from GLDAS version 2.1, which uses weather observations like temperature, humidity, and rainfall to run the Noah land surface model. This model estimates how much of the rain becomes runoff, how much evaporates, and how much infiltrates into the soil. These output variables, calculated every three hours, are aggregated into monthly averages, giving us a record of the hydrologic cycle going all the way back to January 2000. Because the model is run with 0.25 degree spatial resolution (~30 km), these data should only be used for regional analysis. A specific farm or other small area might experience very different conditions than the region around it, especially because human influences like irrigation are not included.This app can also be seen as a useful template for sharing other climate datasets. If you would like to customize it for your own organization, or use it as a starting point for your own scientific application, the source code is available on github for anyone to use.

  12. H

    AReNA’s DHS-GIS Database

    • dataverse.harvard.edu
    Updated Feb 23, 2021
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) (2021). AReNA’s DHS-GIS Database [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/OQIPRW
    Explore at:
    CroissantCroissant is a format for machine-learning datasets. Learn more about this at mlcommons.org/croissant.
    Dataset updated
    Feb 23, 2021
    Dataset provided by
    Harvard Dataverse
    Authors
    International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI)
    License

    https://dataverse.harvard.edu/api/datasets/:persistentId/versions/1.1/customlicense?persistentId=doi:10.7910/DVN/OQIPRWhttps://dataverse.harvard.edu/api/datasets/:persistentId/versions/1.1/customlicense?persistentId=doi:10.7910/DVN/OQIPRW

    Time period covered
    1980 - 2019
    Area covered
    Bangladesh, Nigeria, Rwanda, Lesotho, Myanmar, Nepal, Mali, Kenya, Burundi, Benin
    Dataset funded by
    The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
    Description

    Advancing Research on Nutrition and Agriculture (AReNA) is a 6-year, multi-country project in South Asia and sub-Saharan Africa funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, being implemented from 2015 through 2020. The objective of AReNA is to close important knowledge gaps on the links between nutrition and agriculture, with a particular focus on conducting policy-relevant research at scale and crowding in more research on this issue by creating data sets and analytical tools that can benefit the broader research community. Much of the research on agriculture and nutrition is hindered by a lack of data, and many of the datasets that do contain both agriculture and nutrition information are often small in size and geographic scope. AReNA team constructed a large multi-level, multi-country dataset combining nutrition and nutrition-relevant information at the individual and household level from the Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) with a wide variety of geo-referenced data on agricultural production, agroecology, climate, demography, and infrastructure (GIS data). This dataset includes 60 countries, 184 DHS, and 122,473 clusters. Over one thousand geospatial variables are linked with DHS. The entire dataset is organized into 13 individual files: DHS_distance, DHS_livestock, DHS_main, DHS_malaria, DHS NDVI, DHS_nightlight, DHS_pasture and climate (mean), DHS_rainfall, DHS_soil, DHS_SPAM, DHS_suit, DHS_temperature, and DHS_traveltime.

  13. a

    5.17 Total Cost of Risk (summary)

    • strong-community-connections-tempegov.hub.arcgis.com
    • data.tempe.gov
    • +4more
    Updated Nov 19, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    City of Tempe (2024). 5.17 Total Cost of Risk (summary) [Dataset]. https://strong-community-connections-tempegov.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/5-17-total-cost-of-risk-summary
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Nov 19, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    City of Tempe
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    The Cost of Risk metric shows how much the city spends on handling risks (like insurance, legal expenses, or accident payouts) compared to how much money it collects overall.The performance measure dashboard is available at 5.17 Total Cost of Risk.Additional InformationSource: Peoplesoft and ACFRContact: Laura CalderContact E-Mail: laura.calder@tempe.govData Source Type: ExcelPreparation Method: The total expenses in Fund 2661 (The Risk Management cost center) is divided by the total revenue from Annual Comprehensive Financial Report to calculate the total cost of Risk.Publish Frequency: AnnualPublish Method: ManualData Dictionary (pending update)

  14. A

    SDOT GIS Datasets

    • data.amerigeoss.org
    • data.seattle.gov
    • +2more
    html
    Updated Feb 4, 2019
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    United States (2019). SDOT GIS Datasets [Dataset]. https://data.amerigeoss.org/ca/dataset/sdot-gis-datasets
    Explore at:
    htmlAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Feb 4, 2019
    Dataset provided by
    United States
    Description

    Seattle Transportation GIS Datasets | https://data-seattlecitygis.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets?t=transportation | Lifecycle status: Production | Purpose: to enable open access to SDOT GIS data. This website includes many transportation datasets from categories such as parking, transit, pedestrian, bicycle and roadway assets. Many of this datasets are linked from this website. | PDDL: https://opendatacommons.org/licenses/pddl/

  15. d

    GapMaps Live Location Intelligence Platform | GIS Data | Easy-to-use| One...

    • datarade.ai
    .csv
    Updated Aug 14, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    GapMaps (2024). GapMaps Live Location Intelligence Platform | GIS Data | Easy-to-use| One Login for Global access [Dataset]. https://datarade.ai/data-products/gapmaps-live-location-intelligence-platform-gis-data-easy-gapmaps
    Explore at:
    .csvAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Aug 14, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    GapMaps
    Area covered
    Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Nigeria, Taiwan, Philippines, United States of America, Kenya, Thailand, Egypt, Malaysia
    Description

    GapMaps Live is an easy-to-use location intelligence platform available across 25 countries globally that allows you to visualise your own store data, combined with the latest demographic, economic and population movement intel right down to the micro level so you can make faster, smarter and surer decisions when planning your network growth strategy.

    With one single login, you can access the latest estimates on resident and worker populations, census metrics (eg. age, income, ethnicity), consuming class, retail spend insights and point-of-interest data across a range of categories including fast food, cafe, fitness, supermarket/grocery and more.

    Some of the world's biggest brands including McDonalds, Subway, Burger King, Anytime Fitness and Dominos use GapMaps Live as a vital strategic tool where business success relies on up-to-date, easy to understand, location intel that can power business case validation and drive rapid decision making.

    Primary Use Cases for GapMaps Live includes:

    1. Retail Site Selection - Identify optimal locations for future expansion and benchmark performance across existing locations.
    2. Customer Profiling: get a detailed understanding of the demographic profile of your customers and where to find more of them.
    3. Analyse your catchment areas at a granular grid levels using all the key metrics
    4. Target Marketing: Develop effective marketing strategies to acquire more customers.
    5. Marketing / Advertising (Billboards/OOH, Marketing Agencies, Indoor Screens)
    6. Customer Profiling
    7. Target Marketing
    8. Market Share Analysis

    Some of features our clients love about GapMaps Live include: - View business locations, competitor locations, demographic, economic and social data around your business or selected location - Understand consumer visitation patterns (“where from” and “where to”), frequency of visits, dwell time of visits, profiles of consumers and much more. - Save searched locations and drop pins - Turn on/off all location listings by category - View and filter data by metadata tags, for example hours of operation, contact details, services provided - Combine public data in GapMaps with views of private data Layers - View data in layers to understand impact of different data Sources - Share maps with teams - Generate demographic reports and comparative analyses on different locations based on drive time, walk time or radius. - Access multiple countries and brands with a single logon - Access multiple brands under a parent login - Capture field data such as photos, notes and documents using GapMaps Connect and integrate with GapMaps Live to get detailed insights on existing and proposed store locations.

  16. d

    Rent Burden Greater than 30%

    • catalog.data.gov
    • data.seattle.gov
    • +1more
    Updated Jan 31, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    City of Seattle ArcGIS Online (2025). Rent Burden Greater than 30% [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/rent-burden-greater-than-30-7408b
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jan 31, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    City of Seattle ArcGIS Online
    Description

    Displacement risk indicator showing how many households within the specified groups are facing housing cost burden (contributing more than 30% of monthly income toward housing costs).

  17. GIS Data Italy | Mapping Data | 4.5M+ Places in Italy

    • datarade.ai
    Updated Mar 6, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    InfobelPRO (2025). GIS Data Italy | Mapping Data | 4.5M+ Places in Italy [Dataset]. https://datarade.ai/data-products/gis-data-italy-mapping-data-4-5m-places-in-italy-infobelpro
    Explore at:
    .bin, .json, .xml, .csv, .xls, .sql, .txtAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Mar 6, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Infobelhttp://www.infobel.com/
    Authors
    InfobelPRO
    Area covered
    Italy
    Description

    Unlock precise, high-quality GIS data covering 4.5M+ verified locations across Italy. With 50+ enriched attributes including coordinates, building structures, and spatial geometry our dataset provides the granularity and accuracy needed for in-depth spatial analysis. Powered by AI-driven enrichment and deduplication, and backed by 30+ years of expertise, our GIS solutions support industries ranging from mapping and navigation to urban planning and market analysis, helping businesses and organizations make smarter, data-driven decisions.

    Key use cases of GIS Data helping our customers :

    1. Optimize Mapping & Spatial Analysis : Use GIS data to analyse landscapes, urban infrastructure, and competitor locations, ensuring data-driven planning and decision-making.
    2. Enhance Navigation & Location-Based Services : Improve real-time route planning, asset tracking, and EV charging station discovery for seamless location-based experiences.
    3. Identify Strategic Sites for Business Expansion : Leverage GIS intelligence to select optimal retail sites, franchise locations, and warehouses with precision.
    4. Improve Logistics & Address Accuracy : Streamline delivery networks, validate addresses, and optimize courier routes to boost efficiency and customer satisfaction.
    5. Support Environmental & Urban Development Initiatives : Utilize GIS insights for disaster preparedness, sustainable city planning, and land-use management.
  18. AFSC/ABL: ShoreZone Ground Stations, web-posted database in ArcGIS

    • fisheries.noaa.gov
    • s.cnmilf.com
    • +2more
    csv
    Updated Jan 1, 2014
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Steve Lewis; Mandy Lindeberg (2014). AFSC/ABL: ShoreZone Ground Stations, web-posted database in ArcGIS [Dataset]. https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/inport/item/17257
    Explore at:
    csvAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jan 1, 2014
    Dataset provided by
    Alaska Fisheries Science Center
    Authors
    Steve Lewis; Mandy Lindeberg
    Time period covered
    2002 - 2012
    Area covered
    Alaska, Prince William Sound, Gulf of Alaska, Kodiak archipelago, Katmai National Park, Kenai Fjords National Park, Alaska,
    Description

    The web-posted Alaska Shore Station Database is a compilation of hundreds of intertidal sites that were visited and evaluated throughout the coastal waters of Alaska. At each station attempts are made to document all observed species and their assemblages, geomorphic features, measurements of beach length and slope, and gather photographic examples. This online database has been designed to int...

  19. California Overlapping Cities and Counties and Identifiers with Coastal...

    • data.ca.gov
    • gis.data.ca.gov
    • +3more
    Updated Feb 20, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    California Department of Technology (2025). California Overlapping Cities and Counties and Identifiers with Coastal Buffers [Dataset]. https://data.ca.gov/dataset/california-overlapping-cities-and-counties-and-identifiers-with-coastal-buffers
    Explore at:
    zip, geojson, html, gpkg, csv, txt, arcgis geoservices rest api, kml, xlsx, gdbAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Feb 20, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    California Department of Technologyhttp://cdt.ca.gov/
    Area covered
    California
    Description

    WARNING: This is a pre-release dataset and its fields names and data structures are subject to change. It should be considered pre-release until the end of 2024. Expected changes:

    • Metadata is missing or incomplete for some layers at this time and will be continuously improved.
    • We expect to update this layer roughly in line with CDTFA at some point, but will increase the update cadence over time as we are able to automate the final pieces of the process.
    This dataset is continuously updated as the source data from CDTFA is updated, as often as many times a month. If you require unchanging point-in-time data, export a copy for your own use rather than using the service directly in your applications.

    Purpose

    County and incorporated place (city) boundaries along with third party identifiers used to join in external data. Boundaries are from the authoritative source the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration (CDTFA), altered to show the counties as one polygon. This layer displays the city polygons on top of the County polygons so the area isn"t interrupted. The GEOID attribute information is added from the US Census. GEOID is based on merged State and County FIPS codes for the Counties. Abbreviations for Counties and Cities were added from Caltrans Division of Local Assistance (DLA) data. Place Type was populated with information extracted from the Census. Names and IDs from the US Board on Geographic Names (BGN), the authoritative source of place names as published in the Geographic Name Information System (GNIS), are attached as well. Finally, the coastline is used to separate coastal buffers from the land-based portions of jurisdictions. This feature layer is for public use.

    Related Layers

    This dataset is part of a grouping of many datasets:

    1. Cities: Only the city boundaries and attributes, without any unincorporated areas
    2. Counties: Full county boundaries and attributes, including all cities within as a single polygon
    3. Cities and Full Counties: A merge of the other two layers, so polygons overlap within city boundaries. Some customers require this behavior, so we provide it as a separate service.
    4. Place Abbreviations
    5. Unincorporated Areas (Coming Soon)
    6. Census Designated Places (Coming Soon)
    7. Cartographic Coastline
    Working with Coastal Buffers
    The dataset you are currently viewing includes the coastal buffers for cities and counties that have them in the authoritative source data from CDTFA. In the versions where they are included, they remain as a second polygon on cities or counties that have them, with all the same identifiers, and a value in the COASTAL field indicating if it"s an ocean or a bay buffer. If you wish to have a single polygon per jurisdiction that includes the coastal buffers, you can run a Dissolve on the version that has the coastal buffers on all the fields except COASTAL, Area_SqMi, Shape_Area, and Shape_Length to get a version with the correct identifiers.

    Point of Contact

    California Department of Technology, Office of Digital Services, odsdataservices@state.ca.gov

    Field and Abbreviation Definitions

    • COPRI: county number followed by the 3-digit city primary number used in the Board of Equalization"s 6-digit tax rate area numbering system
    • Place Name: CDTFA incorporated (city) or county name
    • County: CDTFA county name. For counties, this will be the name of the polygon itself. For cities, it is the name of the county the city polygon is within.
    • Legal Place Name: Board on Geographic Names authorized nomenclature for area names published in the Geographic Name Information System
    • GNIS_ID: The numeric identifier from the Board on Geographic Names that can be used to join these boundaries to other datasets utilizing this identifier.
    • GEOID: numeric geographic identifiers from the US Census Bureau Place Type: Board on Geographic Names authorized nomenclature for boundary type published in the Geographic Name Information System
    • Place Abbr: CalTrans Division of Local Assistance abbreviations of incorporated area names
    • CNTY Abbr: CalTrans Division of Local Assistance abbreviations of county names
    • Area_SqMi: The area of the administrative unit (city or county) in square miles, calculated in EPSG 3310 California Teale Albers.
    • COASTAL: Indicates if the polygon is a coastal buffer. Null for land polygons. Additional values include "ocean" and "bay".
    • GlobalID: While all of the layers we provide in this dataset include a GlobalID field with unique values, we do not recommend you make any use of it. The GlobalID field exists to support offline sync, but is not persistent, so data keyed to it will be orphaned at our next update. Use one of the other persistent identifiers, such as GNIS_ID or GEOID instead.

    Accuracy

    CDTFA"s source data notes the following about accuracy:

    City boundary changes and county boundary line adjustments filed with the Board of Equalization per Government Code 54900. This GIS layer contains the boundaries of the unincorporated county and incorporated cities within the state of California. The initial dataset was created in March of 2015 and was based on the State Board of Equalization tax rate area boundaries. As of April 1, 2024, the maintenance of this dataset is provided by the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration for the purpose of determining sales and use tax rates. The boundaries are continuously being revised to align with aerial imagery when areas of conflict are discovered between the original boundary provided by the California State Board of Equalization and the boundary made publicly available by local, state, and federal government. Some differences may occur between actual recorded boundaries and the boundaries used for sales and use tax purposes. The boundaries in this map are representations of taxing jurisdictions for the purpose of determining sales and use tax rates and should not be used to determine precise city or county boundary line locations. COUNTY = county name; CITY = city name or unincorporated

  20. d

    GIS Data | Mapping Data | Global Coverage: US UK Germany France (...) |...

    • datarade.ai
    Updated Mar 4, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    InfobelPRO (2025). GIS Data | Mapping Data | Global Coverage: US UK Germany France (...) | 164M+ Places [Dataset]. https://datarade.ai/data-products/gis-data-mapping-data-global-coverage-us-uk-germany-f-infobelpro
    Explore at:
    .bin, .json, .xml, .csv, .xls, .sql, .txtAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Mar 4, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    InfobelPRO
    Area covered
    United Kingdom, Germany, France, United States
    Description

    Unlock precise, high-quality GIS data covering 164M+ verified locations across 220+ countries. With 50+ enriched attributes including coordinates, building structures, and spatial geometry our dataset provides the granularity and accuracy needed for in-depth spatial analysis. Powered by AI-driven enrichment and deduplication, and backed by 30+ years of expertise, our GIS solutions support industries ranging from mapping and navigation to urban planning and market analysis, helping businesses and organizations make smarter, data-driven decisions.

    Key use cases of GIS Data helping our customers :

    1. Optimize Mapping & Spatial Analysis : Use GIS data to analyse landscapes, urban infrastructure, and competitor locations, ensuring data-driven planning and decision-making.
    2. Enhance Navigation & Location-Based Services : Improve real-time route planning, asset tracking, and EV charging station discovery for seamless location-based experiences.
    3. Identify Strategic Sites for Business Expansion : Leverage GIS intelligence to select optimal retail sites, franchise locations, and warehouses with precision.
    4. Improve Logistics & Address Accuracy : Streamline delivery networks, validate addresses, and optimize courier routes to boost efficiency and customer satisfaction.
    5. Support Environmental & Urban Development Initiatives : Utilize GIS insights for disaster preparedness, sustainable city planning, and land-use management.
Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Esri (2018). ACS Housing Costs Variables - Boundaries [Dataset]. https://covid-hub.gio.georgia.gov/maps/9c7647840d6540e4864d205bac505027
Organization logo

ACS Housing Costs Variables - Boundaries

Explore at:
2 scholarly articles cite this dataset (View in Google Scholar)
Dataset updated
Dec 12, 2018
Dataset authored and provided by
Esrihttp://esri.com/
Area covered
Description

This layer shows housing costs as a percentage of household income. This is shown by tract, county, and state boundaries. This service is updated annually to contain the most currently released American Community Survey (ACS) 5-year data, and contains estimates and margins of error. There are also additional calculated attributes related to this topic, which can be mapped or used within analysis. Income is based on earnings in past 12 months of survey. This layer is symbolized to show the percent of renter households that spend 30.0% or more of their household income on gross rent (contract rent plus tenant-paid utilities). To see the full list of attributes available in this service, go to the "Data" tab, and choose "Fields" at the top right. Current Vintage: 2019-2023ACS Table(s): B25070, B25091 Data downloaded from: Census Bureau's API for American Community Survey Date of API call: December 12, 2024National Figures: data.census.govThe United States Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS):About the SurveyGeography & ACSTechnical DocumentationNews & UpdatesThis ready-to-use layer can be used within ArcGIS Pro, ArcGIS Online, its configurable apps, dashboards, Story Maps, custom apps, and mobile apps. Data can also be exported for offline workflows. For more information about ACS layers, visit the FAQ. Please cite the Census and ACS when using this data.Data Note from the Census:Data are based on a sample and are subject to sampling variability. The degree of uncertainty for an estimate arising from sampling variability is represented through the use of a margin of error. The value shown here is the 90 percent margin of error. The margin of error can be interpreted as providing a 90 percent probability that the interval defined by the estimate minus the margin of error and the estimate plus the margin of error (the lower and upper confidence bounds) contains the true value. In addition to sampling variability, the ACS estimates are subject to nonsampling error (for a discussion of nonsampling variability, see Accuracy of the Data). The effect of nonsampling error is not represented in these tables.Data Processing Notes:This layer is updated automatically when the most current vintage of ACS data is released each year, usually in December. The layer always contains the latest available ACS 5-year estimates. It is updated annually within days of the Census Bureau's release schedule. Click here to learn more about ACS data releases.Boundaries come from the US Census TIGER geodatabases, specifically, the National Sub-State Geography Database (named tlgdb_(year)_a_us_substategeo.gdb). Boundaries are updated at the same time as the data updates (annually), and the boundary vintage appropriately matches the data vintage as specified by the Census. These are Census boundaries with water and/or coastlines erased for cartographic and mapping purposes. For census tracts, the water cutouts are derived from a subset of the 2020 Areal Hydrography boundaries offered by TIGER. Water bodies and rivers which are 50 million square meters or larger (mid to large sized water bodies) are erased from the tract level boundaries, as well as additional important features. For state and county boundaries, the water and coastlines are derived from the coastlines of the 2023 500k TIGER Cartographic Boundary Shapefiles. These are erased to more accurately portray the coastlines and Great Lakes. The original AWATER and ALAND fields are still available as attributes within the data table (units are square meters).The States layer contains 52 records - all US states, Washington D.C., and Puerto RicoCensus tracts with no population that occur in areas of water, such as oceans, are removed from this data service (Census Tracts beginning with 99).Percentages and derived counts, and associated margins of error, are calculated values (that can be identified by the "_calc_" stub in the field name), and abide by the specifications defined by the American Community Survey.Field alias names were created based on the Table Shells file available from the American Community Survey Summary File Documentation page.Negative values (e.g., -4444...) have been set to null, with the exception of -5555... which has been set to zero. These negative values exist in the raw API data to indicate the following situations:The margin of error column indicates that either no sample observations or too few sample observations were available to compute a standard error and thus the margin of error. A statistical test is not appropriate.Either no sample observations or too few sample observations were available to compute an estimate, or a ratio of medians cannot be calculated because one or both of the median estimates falls in the lowest interval or upper interval of an open-ended distribution.The median falls in the lowest interval of an open-ended distribution, or in the upper interval of an open-ended distribution. A statistical test is not appropriate.The estimate is controlled. A statistical test for sampling variability is not appropriate.The data for this geographic area cannot be displayed because the number of sample cases is too small.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu