Lithium rose to 94,400 CNY/T on December 2, 2025, up 0.05% from the previous day. Over the past month, Lithium's price has risen 16.54%, and is up 20.64% compared to the same time last year, according to trading on a contract for difference (CFD) that tracks the benchmark market for this commodity. Lithium - values, historical data, forecasts and news - updated on December of 2025.

Dataset Overview

This dataset provides a comprehensive view of the aging process of lithium-ion batteries, facilitating the estimation of their Remaining Useful Life (RUL). Originally sourced from NASA's open repository, the dataset has undergone meticulous preprocessing to enhance its analytical utility. The data is presented in a user-friendly CSV format after extracting relevant features from the original .mat files.

Key Features of the Dataset

1. Battery Performance Metrics:

   • Capacity: Measured over time to assess degradation.
   • Internal Resistance (Re): Represents the electrical resistance of the battery.
   • Charge Transfer Resistance (Rct): Indicates charge movement efficiency.

2. Environmental Conditions:

   • Ambient Temperature: External temperature affecting battery performance.

3. Identification Attributes:

   • Battery ID: Unique identifier for each battery tested.
   • Test ID: Links specific test conditions to outcomes.
   • UID & Filename: Traceable dataset references.

4. Processed Data:

   • Missing values have been addressed.
   • Columns irrelevant to RUL estimation have been removed.
   • Skewness in the data has been corrected for statistical accuracy.

5. Labels:

   • Degradation States: Categorized into intervals for easier interpretation.
   • Ranges include operational and failure states.

Potential Applications

1. Battery Health Monitoring:

   • Predict battery failure timelines.
   • Enhance battery maintenance strategies.

2. Data Science and Machine Learning:

   • Model development for RUL prediction.
   • Feature engineering for predictive analysis.

3. Research and Development:

   • Improve battery design.
   • Study the impact of environmental and operational conditions on battery life.

Technical Details

• File Format: CSV
• Size: ~625.02 kB
• Columns: 9
• Data Points: Multiple observations across various tests.

Tags

• Keywords: Lithium-ion batteries, RUL, Battery Aging, Machine Learning, Data Analysis, Predictive Maintenance.

License

• Apache 2.0: Permits academic and commercial use.

Usage Instructions

1. Import the dataset into your data analysis tools (e.g., Python, R, MATLAB).
2. Explore features to understand correlations and dependencies.
3. Use machine learning models for RUL prediction.

Provenance

The dataset was retrieved from NASA's publicly available data repositories. It has been preprocessed to align with research and industrial standards for usability in analytical tasks.

Call to Action

Leverage this dataset to enhance your understanding of lithium-ion battery degradation and build models that could revolutionize energy storage solutions.

An accelerated Life Testing Dataset for Lithium-Ion Batteries with Constant and Variable Loading Conditions We present an accelerated Li-ion battery life cycle dataset focused on a large range of load levels and the characterization of the life cycle of a battery pack composed of two 18650 battery cells. The life cycle study is conducted with a total of 26 battery packs that are grouped by constant and random loading conditions, loading levels and number of load level changes. Furthermore, we conducted load cycling on second-life batteries, where surviving cells from previously aged battery packs were assembled to second- life packs. The dataset was generated from a custom-made testbed to cycle battery packs designed and developed by Kajetan Fricke, Renato Nascimento, and Prof. Felipe Viana, from the Probabilistic Mechanics Laboratory at the University of Central Florida (UCF).

This data set has been collected from a custom built battery prognostics testbed at the NASA Ames Prognostics Center of Excellence (PCoE). Li-ion batteries were run through 3 different operational profiles (charge, discharge and Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy) at different temperatures. Discharges were carried out at different current load levels until the battery voltage fell to preset voltage thresholds. Some of these thresholds were lower than that recommended by the OEM (2.7 V) in order to induce deep discharge aging effects. Repeated charge and discharge cycles result in accelerated aging of the batteries. The experiments were stopped when the batteries reached the end-of-life (EOL) criteria of 30% fade in rated capacity (from 2 Ah to 1.4 Ah). Data Acquisition: The testbed comprises: * Commercially available Li-ion 18650 sized rechargeable batteries, * Programmable 4-channel DC electronic load, * Programmable 4-channel DC power supply, * Voltmeter, ammeter and thermocouple sensor suite, * Custom EIS equipment, * Environmental chamber to impose various operational conditions, * PXI chassis based DAQ and experiment control, and MATLAB based experiment control, data acquisition and prognostics algorithm evaluation setup (appx. data acquisition rate is 10Hz). Parameter Description: Data Structure: cycle: top level structure array containing the charge, discharge and impedance operations type: operation type, can be charge, discharge or impedance ambient_temperature: ambient temperature (degree C) time: the date and time of the start of the cycle, in MATLAB date vector format data: data structure containing the measurements for charge the fields are: Voltage_measured: Battery terminal voltage (Volts) Current_measured: Battery output current (Amps) Temperature_measured: Battery temperature (degree C) Current_charge: Current measured at charger (Amps) Voltage_charge: Voltage measured at charger (Volts) Time: Time vector for the cycle (secs) for discharge the fields are: Voltage_measured: Battery terminal voltage (Volts) Current_measured: Battery output current (Amps) Temperature_measured: Battery temperature (degree C) Current_charge: Current measured at load (Amps) Voltage_charge: Voltage measured at load (Volts) Time: Time vector for the cycle (secs) Capacity: Battery capacity (Ahr) for discharge till 2.7V for impedance the fields are: Sense_current: Current in sense branch (Amps) Battery_current: Current in battery branch (Amps) Current_ratio: Ratio of the above currents Battery_impedance: Battery impedance (Ohms) computed from raw data Rectified_impedance: Calibrated and smoothed battery impedance (Ohms) Re: Estimated electrolyte resistance (Ohms) Rct: Estimated charge transfer resistance (Ohms) Intended Use: The data sets can serve for a variety of purposes. Because these are essentially a large number of Run-to-Failure time series, the data can be set for development of prognostic algorithms. In particular, due to the differences in depth-of-discharge (DOD), the duration of rest periods and intrinsic variability, no two cells have the same state-of-life (SOL) at the same cycle index. The aim is to be able to manage this uncertainty, which is representative of actual usage, and make reliable predictions of Remaining Useful Life (RUL) in both the End-of-Discharge (EOD) and End-of-Life (EOL) contexts.

Description

This Dataset contains details of List of countries by Lithium Production(2000-2023).

Lithium is a vital mineral used in both medication and battery production. Discovered in the 1790s in Brazil, the element creates a crimson flame when burned. The metal was officially named in 1817, but it was hard to obtain. In 1855, a duo of chemists from Germany and Britain were able to use electrolysis to obtain a larger sample of the element.

Today, lithium is used in rechargeable batteries, such as those found in mobile phones, digital cameras, and electric vehicles. Lithium-ion batteries can hold their charge for much longer than traditional batteries, and they can take a new charge when exposed to electricity.

Lithium is often combined with other elements to perform various jobs. Lithium oxide absorbs moisture well, and it is used to create ceramics and glass. Lithium chloride is used for industrial drying systems.

Lithium is a toxic metal, except for very low doses. However, the lithium carbonate combination is used in medication and may have applications to treat severe mental health concerns like manic depression.

Lithium does not occur in its metallic form naturally, but it is found in igneous rocks or brine from salt water, and it can be extracted from those rocks using electrolysis. Today, the metal is primarily produced through electrolysis of a mixture that is 55% lithium chloride and 45% potassium chloride, exposed to temperatures of 450 degrees Celsius.

Attribute Information

• Entity: The name of the countries.
• Year : Years
• Production: Production in tonnes.

Acknowledgements

https://ourworldindata.org/

Photo by John Cameron on Unsplash

Structured dataset of lithium battery prices in Pakistan, categorized by type, brand, capacity, and price (PKR) as of September 2025.

A set of Li-ion batteries were run through different operational profiles (charge, discharge and impedance) at various temperatures. Impedance measurement was carried out through an electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) frequency.

Repeated charge and discharge cycles result in accelerated aging of the batteries while impedance measurements provide insight into the internal battery parameters that change as aging progresses. The experiments were stopped when the batteries reached end-of-life (EOL) criteria. These datasets can be used for the prediction of both remaining charge (for a given discharge cycle) and remaining useful life (RUL). Data are in Batch of 6 experiments, data provided in .mat files with experiment details in associated READEME.txt -

All of the datasets and the below description are quoted from Project - Data-driven prediction of battery cycle life before capacity degradation.

Objective

This dataset, used in our publication “Data-driven prediction of battery cycle life before capacity degradation”, consists of 124 commercial lithium-ion batteries cycled to failure under fast-charging conditions. These lithium-ion phosphate (LFP)/graphite cells, manufactured by A123 Systems (APR18650M1A), were cycled in horizontal cylindrical fixtures on a 48-channel Arbin LBT potentiostat in a forced convection temperature chamber set to 30°C. The cells have a nominal capacity of 1.1 Ah and a nominal voltage of 3.3 V.

The objective of this work is to optimize fast charging for lithium-ion batteries. As such, all cells in this dataset are charged with a one-step or two-step fast-charging policy. This policy has the format “C1(Q1)-C2”, in which C1 and C2 are the first and second constant-current steps, respectively, and Q1 is the state-of-charge (SOC, %) at which the currents switch. The second current step ends at 80% SOC, after which the cells charge at 1C CC-CV. The upper and lower cutoff potentials are 3.6 V and 2.0 V, respectively, which are consistent with the manufacturer’s specifications. These cutoff potentials are fixed for all current steps, including fast charging; after some cycling, the cells may hit the upper cutoff potential during fast charging, leading to significant constant-voltage charging. All cells discharge at 4C.

The dataset is divided into three “batches”, representing approximately 48 cells each. Each batch is defined by a “batch date”, or the date the tests were started. Each batch has a few irregularities, as detailed on the page for each batch.

The data is provided in two formats. For each batch, a MATLAB struct is available. The struct provides a convenient data container in which the data for each cycle is easily accessible. This struct can be loaded in either MATLAB or python (via the h5py package). Pandas dataframes can be generated via the provided code. Additionally, the raw data for each cell is available as a CSV file. Note that the CSV files occasionally exhibit errors in both test time and step time in which the test time resets to zero mid-cycle; these errors are corrected for in the structs.

The temperature measurements are performed by attaching a Type T thermocouple with thermal epoxy (OMEGATHERM 201) and Kapton tape to the exposed cell can after stripping a small section of the plastic insulation. Note that the temperature measurements are not perfectly reliable; the thermal contact between the thermocouple and the cell can may vary substantially, and the thermocouple sometimes loses contact during cycling.

Internal resistance measurements were obtained during charging at 80% SOC by averaging 10 pulses of ±3.6C with a pulse width of 30 ms (2017-05-12 and 2017-06-30) or 33 ms (2018-04-12).

The following repository contains some starter code to load the datasets in either MATLAB or python:

https://github.com/rdbraatz/data-driven-prediction-of-battery-cycle-life-before-capacity-degradation

Low rate data used to generate figure 4:

• 2018-02-20_batchdata_updated_struct_errorcorrect.mat
• 2018-04-03_varcharge_batchdata_updated_struct_errorcorrect.mat

If using this dataset in a publication, please cite: Severson et al. Data-driven prediction of battery cycle life before capacity degradation. Nature Energy volume 4, pages 383–391 (2019).

**Batch - 2017-05-12**
Experimental design
- All cells were cycled with one-step or two-step charging policies. The charging time varies from ~8 to 13.3 minutes (0-80% SOC). There are generally two cells tested per policy, with the exception of 3.6C(80%).
- 1 minute and 1 second rests were placed after reaching 80% SOC during charging and after discharging, respectively.
-We cycle to 80% of nominal capacity (0.88 Ah).
- An initial C/10 cycle was performed in the beginning of each test.
- The cutoff currents for the constant-voltage steps were C/50 for both charge and discharge.
- The pulse width of the IR test is 30 ms.

Experimental notes
- The computer automatically restarted twice. As such, there are some time gaps in the data.
- The temperature control is somewhat inconsistent, leading to variability in the baseline chamber temperature.
- The tests in channels 4 and 8 did not successfully start and thus do not have data.
- The thermocouples for channels 15 and 16 were accidentally switched.

Data notes
- Cycle 1 data is not available in the struct. The sampling rate for this cycle was initially too high, so we excluded it from the data set to create more manageable file sizes.
- The cells in Channels 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6 (3.6C(80%) and 4C(80%) policies) were stopped at the end of this batch and resume...

This dataset is a cleaned subset of the following dataset:

Paper: LiPo batteries dataset: Capacity, electrochemical impedance spectra, and fit of equivalent circuit model at various states-of-charge and states-of-health Dataset Link: LiPo Battery LP-503562-IS-3 EIS, Capacity, ECM Data

From the original paper:

This dataset contains experimental data of capacity and electrochemical impedance of five Lithium Polymer (LiPo) batteries (model LP-503562-IS-3 manufactured by BAK Technology). All batteries have been subjected to hundreds of charge-discharge cycles to obtain their characteristics at different states-of-health. Capacities have been measured under both standard and stress conditions.

Specifications of the batteries tested:

• Nominal Capacity: 1.1 Ah
• Nominal Voltage: 3.7 V (standard for LiPo).
  • Equivalently, 1S -- 1 cell in Series
  • https://www.rogershobbycenter.com/lipoguide
• LiPo cells are safe down to a voltage of 3.0V per cell.
  • More conservative ratings have 3.2V or 3.3V as lowest safe threshold

There are three files in this dataset:

• cycle_voltage_extracted_charge_std.csv: Compares the voltage of the battery to the extracted charge in amp-hours Ah (i.e. how much charge we have pulled out of the battery). The cycle number of the battery is included as well (i.e. how many times the battery has been charged and discharged). This file represents "standard" conditions for charging and discharging.
• cycle_voltage_extracted_charge_stress.csv: Same columns as previous file, but data was taken under "stress-testing" conditions for the batteries. This file has a size of 63M, which is still fairly small but may take a bit to plot.
• cycle_vs_capacity.csv: Compares the cycle number to total battery capacity in Ah.

This data is shared under a CC BY 4.0 license.

This dataset consists of part 1 of the data associated with publication "Data-driven Direct Diagnosis of PV Connected Batteries "

The synthetic cycles were generated using the mechanistic modeling approach. See “Big data training data for artificial intelligence-based Li-ion diagnosis and prognosis“ (Journal of Power Sources, Volume 479, 15 December 2020, 228806) and "Analysis of Synthetic Voltage vs. Capacity Datasets for Big Data Li-ion Diagnosis and Prognosis" (Energies 2021, 14, 2371 ) for more details.

These datasets were compiled with a resolution of 0.01 for the triplets and C/25 charges. This accounts for more than 5,000 different paths. Each path was simulated with at most 0.85% increases for each. Each dataset contains more than 700,000 unique voltage vs. capacity curves.

Two datasets are provided, one for training and one for validation. There were generated with slightly different cell parameters to account for cell-to-cell variations. Details are available in publication. For each dataset, 3 set of files are provided, the V files contains V vs. Q data, the t files contains V vs. time data and the R files contains rate vs. Q data.

More details on content is provided in the read me file.

All simulations were performed with the 2022 version of the alawa toolbox using stock electrode data. Voltage and kinetics of electrodes from different manufacturers, with different composition, or with different architecture might differ significantly.

Index Time Series for Global X Battery Tech & Lithium ETF. The frequency of the observation is daily. Moving average series are also typically included. NA

Intro

Dataset from the publication "Lithium-ion battery degradation: comprehensive cycle ageing data and analysis for commercial 21700 cells", DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2024.234185

Full details of the study can be found in the publication, including thorough descriptions of the experimental methods and structure. A basic desciption of the experimental procedure and data structure is included here for ease of use.

Commercial 21700 cylindrical cells (LG M50T, LG GBM50T2170) were cycle aged under 3 different temperatures [10, 25, 40] °C and 4 different SoC ranges [0-30, 70-85, 85-100, 0-100]%, as well as a further [0-100]% SoC range experiment which utilised a drive-cycle discharge instead of constant-current. The same C-rates (0.3C / 1 C, for charge / discharge) were used in all tests; multiple cells were tested under each condition. These are listed in the table below.

Cells were base-cooled at set temperatures using bespoke test rigs (see our linked publications for details; the supporting information file contains detailed descriptions and photographs). Cells were subject to break-in cycles prior to beginning of life (BoL) performance tests using the ‘Reference Performance Test’ (RPT) procedures. They were then alternately subject to ageing sets and RPTs until the end of testing. Full details of each of these procedures are described in the linked publication.

The data contained in this repository is then described in the Data section below. This includes a description of the folder structure and naming conventions, file formats, and data analysis methods used for the ‘Processed Data’ which has been calculated from the raw data.

An 'experimental_metadata' .xlsx file is included to aid parsing of data. A jupyter notebook has also been included to demonstate how to access some of the data.

Data

Data are organised according to their parent ‘Experiment’, as defined above, with a folder for each. Within each Experiment folder, there are 3 subfolders: ‘Summary Data’, ‘Processed Timeseries Data’, and ‘Raw Data’.

Summary Data

This folder contains data which has been extracted by processing the raw data in the ‘Degradation Cycling’ and ‘Performance Checks’ folders. In most cases, the data you are looking for will be stored here.

It contains:

Performance Summary

A summary file for each cell which details key ageing metrics such as number of ageing cycles, charge throughput, cell capacity, resistance, and degradation mode analysis results. Each row of data corresponds to a different SoH.

Degradation Mode Analysis (DMA) was also performed on the C/10 discharge data at each RPT. This analysis uses an optimisation function to determine the capacities and offset of the positive and negative electrodes by calculating a full cell voltage vs capacity curve using 1/2 cell data and comparing against the experimentally measured voltage vs capacity data from the C/10 discharge. See our ACS publication for more details.

Data includes:

· Ageing Set: numbered 0 (BoL) to x, where x is the number of ageing sets the cell has been subject to.

· Ageing Cycles: number of ageing cycles the cell has been subject to. *this is not equivalent full cycles.

· Ageing Set Start Date/ End date: The date that each ageing set began/ ended.

· Days of degradation: Number of days between the date of the first ageing set beginning and the current ageing set ending.

· Age set average temperature: average recorded surface temperature of the cell during cycle ageing. Temperature was recorded approximately 1/2 way up the length of the cell (i.e. between positive and negative caps).

· Charge throughput: total accumulated charge recorded during all cycles during ageing (i.e. sum of charge and discharge). This is the cumulative total since BoL (not including RPTs, and not including break-in cycles).

· Energy throughput: as with "charge throughput", but for energy.

· C/10 Capacity: the capacity recorded during the C/10 discharge test of each RPT.

· C/2 Capacity: the capacity recorded during the C/2 discharge test of each even-numbered RPT.

· 0.1s Resistance: The resistance calculated from the 25-pulse GITT test of each even-numbered RPT. This value is taken from the 12th pulse of the procedure (which corresponds to ~52% SoC at BoL). The resistance is calculated by dividing the voltage drop by the current at a timecale of 0.1 seconds after the current pulse is applied (the fastest timescale possible under the 10 Hz recording condition).

· Fitting parameters: output from the DMA optimisation function; 5 parameters which detail the upper/lower SoCs of each electrode, and the capacity fraction of graphite in the negative electrode.

· Capacity and offset data: calculated based on the fitting parameters above alongside the measured C/10 discharge capacity.

· DM data: Quantities of LLI, LAM-PE, LAM-NE, LAM-NE-Gr, and LAM-NE-Si calculated from the change in capacities/offset of each electrode since BoL.

· RMSE data: the root mean squared error of the optimisation function calculated from the residual between the measured and simulated voltage vs capacity profiles.

Ageing Sets Summary

Data from the ageing cycles, summarised on an average per cycle and an average per ageing set basis. Metrics include mean/ max/ min temperatures, voltages etc.

Processed Timeseries data

Timeseries data (voltage, current, temperature, etc.) from each subtest (pOCV, GITT, etc.) of the RPTs, all grouped by subtest-type and by cell ID.

Contains the same data as in the ‘Performance Checks’ subfolder of the 'Raw Data' folder, but has been processed to slice into relevant subtests from the RPT procedure and includes only limited variables (time, voltage, current, charge, temperature). These are all saved as .csv files. In general this data will be easier to access than the raw data, but perhaps not as rich.

Raw Data

These are the raw data from the performance checks and from the degradation cycles themselves. The data from here has already been processed by me to get values of ‘energy throughput’, ‘charge throughput’, ‘average ageing temperature’, etc., which are all saved in the ‘Summary Data’ folder as described in the relevant section above.

The data in the ‘Degradation Cycling’ folder are organised by ageing set (where an ageing set is a defined number of ageing cycles, as described in the paper). In theory, each cell should have one datafile in each ageing set subfolder. However, due to experimental issues, tests can sometimes be interrupted midway though, requiring the test to be subsequently resumed. In this case, there may be

This dataset contains the predicted prices of the asset Lithium over the next 16 years. This data is calculated initially using a default 5 percent annual growth rate, and after page load, it features a sliding scale component where the user can then further adjust the growth rate to their own positive or negative projections. The maximum positive adjustable growth rate is 100 percent, and the minimum adjustable growth rate is -100 percent.

This data release provides the descriptions of approximately 20 U.S. sites that include mineral regions, mines, and mineral occurrences (deposits and prospects) that contain enrichments of lithium (Li). This release includes sites that have a contained resource and (or) past production of lithium metal greater than 15,000 metric tons. Sites in this database occur in Arkansas, California, Nevada, North Carolina, and Utah. There are several deposits that were not included in the database because they did not meet the cutoff requirement, and those occur in Arizona, Colorado, the New England area, New Mexico, South Dakota, and Wyoming. In the United States, lithium was first mined from pegmatite orebodies in South Dakota in the late 1800s. The Kings Mountain pegmatite belt of North Carolina also had significant production from pegmatites, and the area may still contain as much as 750 million metric tons (Mt) of ore containing 5 Mt lithium metal (Kesler and others, 2012). In 2018, U.S. production of lithium was restricted to a single lithium-brine mining operation in Nevada. In 2018, the U.S. had a net import reliance as a percentage of apparent consumption of more than 50 percent for lithium (U.S. Geological Survey, 2019). The U.S. is not a significant producer of lithium, so the commodity is mainly imported from Chile and Argentina to meet consumer demand. Lithium is necessary for strategic, consumer, and commercial applications. The primary uses for lithium are in batteries, ceramics, glass, metallurgy, pharmaceuticals, and polymers (U.S. Geological Survey, 2019). Lithium has excellent electrical conductivity and low density (lithium metal will float on water), making it an ideal component for battery manufacturing. Lithium is traded in three primary forms: mineral concentrates, mineral compounds (from brines), and refined metal (electrolysis from lithium chloride). Lithium mineralogy is diverse; it occurs in a variety of pegmatite minerals such as spodumene, lepidolite, amblygonite, and in the clay mineral hectorite. Current global production of lithium is dominated by pegmatite and closed-basin brine deposits, but there are significant resources in lithium-bearing clay minerals, oilfield brines, and geothermal brines (Bradley and others, 2017). The entries and descriptions in the database were derived from published papers, reports, data, and internet documents representing a variety of sources, including geologic and exploration studies described in State, Federal, and industry reports. Resources extracted from older sources might not be compliant with current rules and guidelines in minerals industry standards such as National Instrument 43-101 (NI 43-101) or the Joint Ore Reserves Committee Code (JORC Code). The inclusion of a particular lithium mineral deposit in this database is not meant to imply that the deposit is currently economic. Rather, these deposits were included to capture the characteristics of the larger lithium deposits in the United States, which are diverse in their geology and resource potential. Inclusion of material in the database is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. The authors welcome additional published information in order to continually update and refine this dataset. Bradley, D.C., Stillings, L.L., Jaskula, B.W., Munk, LeeAnn, and McCauley, A.D., 2017, Lithium, chap. K of Schulz, K.J., DeYoung, J.H., Jr., Seal, R.R., II, and Bradley, D.C., eds., Critical mineral resources of the United States—Economic and environmental geology and prospects for future supply: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1802, p. K1–K21, https://doi.org/10.3133/pp1802K. Kesler, S.E., Gruber, P.W., Medina, P.A., Keoleian, G.A., Everson, M.P., and Wallington, T.J., 2012, Global lithium resources—relative importance of pegmatite, brine and other deposits: Ore Geology Reviews, v. 48, October ed., p. 55—69. U.S. Geological Survey, 2019, Mineral commodity summaries 2019: U.S. Geological Survey, 200 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/70202434.

Index Time Series for Global X Lithium Producers Index ETF. The frequency of the observation is daily. Moving average series are also typically included. NA

Fires involving lithium batteries are the fastest growing fire risk in London. This dataset provides a breakdown of all Electrical Vehicle and lithium-ion related fires from Calendar Year 2017 onwards: The first tab provides data on incidents The second tab provides figures on fatalities and injuries. The data is updated monthly, one month in arrears. The London Fire Commissioner is the fire and rescue authority for London and runs the London Fire Brigade. For more information on how to store lithium battery produces, click here.

This dataset provides historical stock market performance data for specific companies. It enables users to analyze and understand the past trends and fluctuations in stock prices over time. This information can be utilized for various purposes such as investment analysis, financial research, and market trend forecasting.

Information about the largest lithium companies: Livent, Albemarle, Piedmont Lithium, Sociedad Química, FMC, Ganfeng Lithium (002460.SZ), Tianqi Lithium (002466.SZ).

Data is provided by day periods.

Columns: open price, high price, low price, close price, adj close and volume of stocks during the period.

Source: Yahoo finance

Price-To-Tangible-Book-Ratio Time Series for Shenzhen Chengxin Lithium Group Co Ltd. Chengxin Lithium Group Co., Ltd. engages in the mining, production, and sale of lithium salt and metal, and timber products in China. It operates through two segments Forestry Planting and Sales Business; and Lithium Product Processing and Sales Business. The company offers lithium concentrate, carbonate, hydroxide, chloride, and other lithium metals. Its products are used in lithium-ion power batteries, energy storage, petrochemical, pharmaceutical, and other fields. The company was formerly known as Shenzhen Chengxin Lithium Group Co., Ltd. and changed its name to Chengxin Lithium Group Co., Ltd. in September 2021. Chengxin Lithium Group Co., Ltd. was incorporated in 1997 and is headquartered in Shenzhen, China.