Context

Making dataset "Google Analytics Customer Revenue Prediction" easier and quicker to parse.

Content

This is the same information as dataset "Google Analytics Customer Revenue Prediction" with the JSON columns expanded (flattened) into additional csv columns.

Acknowledgements

Thanks to the original dataset "Google Analytics Customer Revenue Prediction"; it's safe to say that without you I could not exist as a more reduced space but equally as informative dataset.

Inspiration

Your data will be in front of the world's largest data science community. What questions do you want to see answered?

Context

The Google Merchandise Store sells Google branded merchandise. The data is typical of what you would see for an ecommerce website.

Content

The sample dataset contains Google Analytics 360 data from the Google Merchandise Store, a real ecommerce store. The Google Merchandise Store sells Google branded merchandise. The data is typical of what you would see for an ecommerce website. It includes the following kinds of information:

Traffic source data: information about where website visitors originate. This includes data about organic traffic, paid search traffic, display traffic, etc. Content data: information about the behavior of users on the site. This includes the URLs of pages that visitors look at, how they interact with content, etc. Transactional data: information about the transactions that occur on the Google Merchandise Store website.

Fork this kernel to get started.

Acknowledgements

Data from: https://bigquery.cloud.google.com/table/bigquery-public-data:google_analytics_sample.ga_sessions_20170801

Banner Photo by Edho Pratama from Unsplash.

Inspiration

What is the total number of transactions generated per device browser in July 2017?

The real bounce rate is defined as the percentage of visits with a single pageview. What was the real bounce rate per traffic source?

What was the average number of product pageviews for users who made a purchase in July 2017?

What was the average number of product pageviews for users who did not make a purchase in July 2017?

What was the average total transactions per user that made a purchase in July 2017?

What is the average amount of money spent per session in July 2017?

What is the sequence of pages viewed?

IoTeX is a decentralized crypto system, a new generation of blockchain platform for the development of the Internet of things (IoT). The project team is sure that the users do not have such an application that would motivate to implement the technology of the Internet of things in life. And while this will not be created, people will not have the desire to spend money and time on IoT. The developers of IoTeX decided to implement not the application itself, but the platform for creation. It is through the platform that innovative steps in the space of the Internet of things will be encouraged. Learn more... This dataset is one of many crypto datasets that are available within the Google Cloud Public Datasets . As with other Google Cloud public datasets, you can query this dataset for free, up to 1TB/month of free processing, every month. Watch this short video to learn how to get started with the public datasets. Want to know how the data from these blockchains were brought into BigQuery, and learn how to analyze the data? En savoir plus

Firmographic Data for Company Intelligence, B2B Segmentation & KYB Firmographic data is the backbone of modern B2B decision-making, powering everything from lead scoring and segmentation to compliance, financial benchmarking, and market expansion planning. Canaria’s enriched Firmographic Data product delivers deep visibility into U.S. companies by combining standardized insights on revenue ranges, employee count, and business category with optional location verification through Google Maps metadata.

This clean and analysis-ready firmographic dataset is built for precision. Every record is structured, normalized, and deduplicated to support automated workflows across CRMs, BI dashboards, compliance tools, financial models, and sales platforms. Updated weekly, our firmographic data ensures that teams stay ahead of organizational shifts, while providing the matchability and granularity required to fuel market intelligence at scale.

If you're working with fragmented company information, incomplete lead lists, or outdated third-party data, Canaria’s Firmographic Data bridges the gap between surface-level signals and operational insight.

Use Cases: What This Firmographic Data Solves Canaria’s firmographic data offering is used by sales, risk, finance, compliance, and strategy teams to strengthen daily operations, strategic planning, and automation initiatives.

Company Analysis • Leverage firmographic data to assess a company’s size, structure, and potential impact within its industry • Identify organizational tiers using clean employee size brackets, location counts, and business hierarchy insights • Analyze firmographic profiles at the branch level, matched with Google Maps data to verify presence, operating hours, and reviews • Map the operational footprint of enterprises across ZIP codes, cities, and regions for trend tracking or competitive benchmarking

Know Your Business (KYB) & Regulatory Compliance • Use firmographic signals such as company type, headquarters address, incorporation location, and estimated size for KYB verification • Identify shell entities or mismatched records using cross-source validation with Google Maps-matched firmographic data • Flag risk-prone entities based on abnormal size-revenue-industry patterns or gaps in metadata • Enhance onboarding pipelines and due diligence platforms by auto-enriching firmographic gaps at scale • Comply with local and international KYB regulations with standardized firmographic data structures

Financial Intelligence & Private Market Benchmarking • Use estimated firmographic variables like annual revenue range, employee count, and industry focus to model private market behavior • Benchmark companies against similar-sized peers within the same vertical, region, or revenue bracket • Replace missing financials with proxy signals from enriched firmographic datasets for internal modeling and client analysis • Feed investor signals and fund models with data on size trends, regional density, and revenue tier shifts • Correlate firmographic data with job postings, hiring behavior, and sentiment for growth prediction models

Market Research, TAM/SAM Modeling & Industry Intelligence • Conduct high-resolution market mapping by combining industry codes, company counts, and firm size across specific geographies • Map sector saturation and whitespace using city, ZIP code, or state-level firmographic intelligence • Analyze shifts in vertical presence, workforce concentration, and mid-market vs. enterprise distribution • Tailor customer segmentation models using clean and consistent firmographic fields • Build TAM/SAM datasets using industry, employee size, revenue tier, and location granularity

B2B Lead Generation & RevOps Segmentation • Score and segment inbound leads using enriched firmographic attributes such as company size, region, industry, and revenue • Eliminate low-value or unqualified leads from prospecting databases by applying firmographic filters • Route leads to the right sales reps or vertical pods based on company headcount, location, and category • Enrich lead records automatically with up-to-date firmographic data pulled from verified external sources • Build ABM lists using revenue-based tiers, industry verticals, and mapped branch data via Google Maps enrichment

What Makes This Firmographic Data Unique Deep Enrichment with Verified Firmographic Attributes • Our firmographic data includes revenue range, employee size bracket, industry classification, company type, and regional identifiers — all normalized to enable aggregation, filtering, and modeling.

Matchable with Google Maps for Accuracy and Context • Match your firmographic records with Google Maps to verify physical branch presence, exact addresses, latitude/longitude, phone numbers, and ratings. This adds a real-world signal layer to abstract company data and supports KYB, lead scoring, and risk assessment.

Continuously Updated and Scalable • Weekly refreshes ensure your firmographi...

Analysis of ‘FAANG- Complete Stock Data’ provided by Analyst-2 (analyst-2.ai), based on source dataset retrieved from https://www.kaggle.com/aayushmishra1512/faang-complete-stock-data on 30 September 2021.

--- Dataset description provided by original source is as follows ---

Context

There are a few companies that are considered to be revolutionary. These companies also happen to be a dream place to work at for many many people across the world. These companies include - Facebook,Amazon,Apple,Netflix and Google also known as FAANG! These companies make ton of money and they help others too by giving them a chance to invest in the companies via stocks and shares. This data wass made targeting these stock prices.

Content

The data contains information such as opening price of a stock, closing price, how much of these stocks were sold and many more things. There are 5 different CSV files in the data for each company.

--- Original source retains full ownership of the source dataset ---

Update — December 7, 2014. – Evidence-based medicine (EBM) is not working for many reasons, for example: 1. Incorrect in their foundations (paradox): hierarchical levels of evidence are supported by opinions (i.e., lowest strength of evidence according to EBM) instead of real data collected from different types of study designs (i.e., evidence). http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1122534 2. The effect of criminal practices by pharmaceutical companies is only possible because of the complicity of others: healthcare systems, professional associations, governmental and academic institutions. Pharmaceutical companies also corrupt at the personal level, politicians and political parties are on their payroll, medical professionals seduced by different types of gifts in exchange of prescriptions (i.e., bribery) which very likely results in patients not receiving the proper treatment for their disease, many times there is no such thing: healthy persons not needing pharmacological treatments of any kind are constantly misdiagnosed and treated with unnecessary drugs. Some medical professionals are converted in K.O.L. which is only a puppet appearing on stage to spread lies to their peers, a person supposedly trained to improve the well-being of others, now deceits on behalf of pharmaceutical companies. Probably the saddest thing is that many honest doctors are being misled by these lies created by the rules of pharmaceutical marketing instead of scientific, medical, and ethical principles. Interpretation of EBM in this context was not anticipated by their creators. “The main reason we take so many drugs is that drug companies don’t sell drugs, they sell lies about drugs.” ―Peter C. Gøtzsche “doctors and their organisations should recognise that it is unethical to receive money that has been earned in part through crimes that have harmed those people whose interests doctors are expected to take care of. Many crimes would be impossible to carry out if doctors weren’t willing to participate in them.” —Peter C Gøtzsche, The BMJ, 2012, Big pharma often commits corporate crime, and this must be stopped. Pending (Colombia): Health Promoter Entities (In Spanish: EPS ―Empresas Promotoras de Salud).

1. Misinterpretations New technologies or concepts are difficult to understand in the beginning, it doesn’t matter their simplicity, we need to get used to new tools aimed to improve our professional practice. Probably the best explanation is here in these videos (credits to Antonio Villafaina for sharing these videos with me). English https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pQHX-SjgQvQ&w=420&h=315 Spanish https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DApozQBrlhU&w=420&h=315 ----------------------- Hypothesis: hierarchical levels of evidence based medicine are wrong Dear Editor, I have data to support the hypothesis described in the title of this letter. Before rejecting the null hypothesis I would like to ask the following open question:Could you support with data that hierarchical levels of evidence based medicine are correct? (1,2) Additional explanation to this question: – Only respond to this question attaching publicly available raw data.– Be aware that more than a question this is a challenge: I have data (i.e., evidence) which is contrary to classic (i.e., McMaster) or current (i.e., Oxford) hierarchical levels of evidence based medicine. An important part of this data (but not all) is publicly available. References
2. Ramirez, Jorge H (2014): The EBM challenge. figshare. http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1135873
3. The EBM Challenge Day 1: No Answers. Competing interests: I endorse the principles of open data in human biomedical research Read this letter on The BMJ – August 13, 2014.http://www.bmj.com/content/348/bmj.g3725/rr/762595Re: Greenhalgh T, et al. Evidence based medicine: a movement in crisis? BMJ 2014; 348: g3725. _ Fileset contents Raw data: Excel archive: Raw data, interactive figures, and PubMed search terms. Google Spreadsheet is also available (URL below the article description). Figure 1. Unadjusted (Fig 1A) and adjusted (Fig 1B) PubMed publication trends (01/01/1992 to 30/06/2014). Figure 2. Adjusted PubMed publication trends (07/01/2008 to 29/06/2014) Figure 3. Google search trends: Jan 2004 to Jun 2014 / 1-week periods. Figure 4. PubMed publication trends (1962-2013) systematic reviews and meta-analysis, clinical trials, and observational studies.
   Figure 5. Ramirez, Jorge H (2014): Infographics: Unpublished US phase 3 clinical trials (2002-2014) completed before Jan 2011 = 50.8%. figshare.http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1121675 Raw data: "13377 studies found for: Completed | Interventional Studies | Phase 3 | received from 01/01/2002 to 01/01/2014 | Worldwide". This database complies with the terms and conditions of ClinicalTrials.gov: http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/about-site/terms-conditions Supplementary Figures (S1-S6). PubMed publication delay in the indexation processes does not explain the descending trends in the scientific output of evidence-based medicine. Acknowledgments I would like to acknowledge the following persons for providing valuable concepts in data visualization and infographics:
4. Maria Fernanda Ramírez. Professor of graphic design. Universidad del Valle. Cali, Colombia.
5. Lorena Franco. Graphic design student. Universidad del Valle. Cali, Colombia. Related articles by this author (Jorge H. Ramírez)
6. Ramirez JH. Lack of transparency in clinical trials: a call for action. Colomb Med (Cali) 2013;44(4):243-6. URL: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24892242
7. Ramirez JH. Re: Evidence based medicine is broken (17 June 2014). http://www.bmj.com/node/759181
8. Ramirez JH. Re: Global rules for global health: why we need an independent, impartial WHO (19 June 2014). http://www.bmj.com/node/759151
9. Ramirez JH. PubMed publication trends (1992 to 2014): evidence based medicine and clinical practice guidelines (04 July 2014). http://www.bmj.com/content/348/bmj.g3725/rr/759895 Recommended articles
10. Greenhalgh Trisha, Howick Jeremy,Maskrey Neal. Evidence based medicine: a movement in crisis? BMJ 2014;348:g3725
11. Spence Des. Evidence based medicine is broken BMJ 2014; 348:g22
12. Schünemann Holger J, Oxman Andrew D,Brozek Jan, Glasziou Paul, JaeschkeRoman, Vist Gunn E et al. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations for diagnostic tests and strategies BMJ 2008; 336:1106
13. Lau Joseph, Ioannidis John P A, TerrinNorma, Schmid Christopher H, OlkinIngram. The case of the misleading funnel plot BMJ 2006; 333:597
14. Moynihan R, Henry D, Moons KGM (2014) Using Evidence to Combat Overdiagnosis and Overtreatment: Evaluating Treatments, Tests, and Disease Definitions in the Time of Too Much. PLoS Med 11(7): e1001655. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001655
15. Katz D. A-holistic view of evidence based medicinehttp://thehealthcareblog.com/blog/2014/05/02/a-holistic-view-of-evidence-based-medicine/ ---

Google’s energy consumption has increased over the last few years, reaching 25.9 terawatt hours in 2023, up from 12.8 terawatt hours in 2019. The company has made efforts to make its data centers more efficient through customized high-performance servers, using smart temperature and lighting, advanced cooling techniques, and machine learning. Datacenters and energy Through its operations, Google pursues a more sustainable impact on the environment by creating efficient data centers that use less energy than the average, transitioning towards renewable energy, creating sustainable workplaces, and providing its users with the technological means towards a cleaner future for the future generations. Through its efficient data centers, Google has also managed to divert waste from its operations away from landfills. Reducing Google’s carbon footprint Google’s clean energy efforts is also related to their efforts to reduce their carbon footprint. Since their commitment to using 100 percent renewable energy, the company has met their targets largely through solar and wind energy power purchase agreements and buying renewable power from utilities. Google is one of the largest corporate purchasers of renewable energy in the world.

This data package includes the underlying data to replicate the charts, tables, and calculations presented in The US Revenue Implications of President Trump’s 2025 Tariffs, PIIE Briefing 25-2.

If you use the data, please cite as:

McKibbin, Warwick, and Geoffrey Shuetrim. 2025. The US Revenue Implications of President Trump’s 2025 Tariffs. PIIE Briefing 25-2. Washington: Peterson Institute for International Economics.

With the phone book era far in the past, database and directory publishers have been forced to transform their business approach, focusing on their digital presence. Despite many publishers rapidly moving away from print services, they are experiencing immovable competition from online search engines and social media platforms within the digital space, negatively affecting revenue growth potential. Industry revenue has been eroding at a CAGR of 4.4% over the past five years and in 2024, a 3.9% drop has led to the industry revenue totaling $4.4 billion. Profit continues to drop in line with revenue, accounting for 4.7% of revenue as publishers invest more in their digital platforms. Interest in printed directories has disappeared as institutional clients and consumers have continued their shift to convenient online resources. Declining demand for print advertising has curbed revenue growth and online revenue has only slightly mitigated this downturn. Though many traditional publishers, such as Yellow Pages, now operate under parent companies with digital resources, directory publishers remain low on the list of options businesses have to choose from in digital advertising. Due to the convenience and connectivity that Facebook and Google services offer, traditional directory publishers have a limited ability to compete. Many providers have rebranded and tailored their services toward client needs, though these efforts have only had a marginal impact on revenue growth. The industry is forecast to decline at an accelerated CAGR of 5.2% over the next five years, reaching an estimated $3.4 billion in 2029, as businesses and consumers continually turn to digital alternatives for information and advertising opportunities. As AI and digital technology innovation expands, social media company products will likely improve at a faster rate than the digital offerings that directory publishers can provide. Though these companies will seek external partnerships to cut costs, they face an uphill battle to boost their visibility and reverse consumer habit trends.

This is a dataset of the profits of academic journal publishers. It contains financial information - revenues, profits, and profit margins - for companies that make this publicly available. It covers the years 2011, 2012, 2013, and 2014. Data is currently incomplete because some publishers do not make this information available, and some annual reports from 2011 are already difficult to find online. An online verison of this dataset, which may be updated more often, is available at: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Avt-G30CZ3ZndEtXSVNqTWhCazhSSEhJS3F1bktaaFE&usp=sharing#gid=4 [Accessed 2 May 2014]. UPDATE 10/12/2014: Some figures updated, especially for 2013. UPDATE 04/05/2015: Some figures for 2014 added. UPDATE 05/08/2015: Figures added for Sage.UPDATE 06/01/2016: Figures added for more publishers for 2014, and AAAS figures corrected for all years.

The US data processing and hosting services industry is navigating a dynamic environment marked by rising demands and revolutionary trends. As digitalization accelerates, data centers have evolved from simple infrastructure to essential strategic assets. These hubs now power services ranging from cloud computing to advanced data analytics. In 2025, the data processing and hosting service market includes giants like Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft Azure and Google Cloud Platform (GCP). Industry revenue currently sits at $383.8 billion, growing robustly at a CAGR of 9.2% over the past five years, including a 6.2% surge in 2025 alone. Alongside leading tech firms, smaller specialized providers cater to sectors like healthcare, financial services and government agencies with precision-placed data storage solutions. Emerging trends significantly influence the evolution of the US data processing and hosting services industry. Prominent among these is edge computing, a decentralized approach that locates data centers closer to end-user devices. Along with AI and modern data centers, these innovations aim to reduce latency and enhance application performance by minimizing resource usage in data transmission, thereby promoting broader adoption of cloud computing. Despite this transformative growth, the US data processing and hosting services industry faces significant hurdles, including a skill gap, escalating energy costs and escalating cybersecurity threats. This scarcity has heightened the focus on software automation, leading many facilities to implement AI solutions. Though offshoring trends lead to lost business for many participants, this activity is limited and the industry still benefits from strong demand, leading to rising profit. The industry is projected to grow at a CAGR of 2.4% to $431.4 billion by 2030. The future holds a mix of challenges and opportunities for the industry. Strategic investments in human capital and advanced technologies will distinguish industry leaders from laggards. Compliance with evolving data sovereignty and privacy regulations will determine local market competitiveness. Continuous innovation is expected to drive this progress, solidifying data centers' roles as pivotal components shaping the digital landscape ahead.

In 2024, Amazon's net revenue from subscription services segment amounted to 44.37 billion U.S. dollars. Subscription services include Amazon Prime, for which Amazon reported 200 million paying members worldwide at the end of 2020. The AWS category generated 107.56 billion U.S. dollars in annual sales. During the most recently reported fiscal year, the company’s net revenue amounted to 638 billion U.S. dollars. Amazon revenue segments Amazon is one of the biggest online companies worldwide. In 2019, the company’s revenue increased by 21 percent, compared to Google’s revenue growth during the same fiscal period, which was just 18 percent. The majority of Amazon’s net sales are generated through its North American business segment, which accounted for 236.3 billion U.S. dollars in 2020. The United States are the company’s leading market, followed by Germany and the United Kingdom. Business segment: Amazon Web Services Amazon Web Services, commonly referred to as AWS, is one of the strongest-growing business segments of Amazon. AWS is a cloud computing service that provides individuals, companies and governments with a wide range of computing, networking, storage, database, analytics and application services, among many others. As of the third quarter of 2020, AWS accounted for approximately 32 percent of the global cloud infrastructure services vendor market.

In the first quarter of 2025, revenues of Amazon Web Services (AWS) rose to 17 percent, a decrease from the previous three quarters. AWS is one of Amazon’s strongest revenue segments, generating over 115 billion U.S. dollars in 2024 net sales, up from 105 billion U.S. dollars in 2023. Amazon Web Services Amazon Web Services (AWS) provides on-demand cloud platforms and APIs through a pay-as-you-go-model to customers. AWS launched in 2002 providing general services and tools and produced its first cloud products in 2006. Today, more than 175 different cloud services for a variety of technologies and industries are released already. AWS ranks as one of the most popular public cloud infrastructure and platform services running applications worldwide in 2020, ahead of Microsoft Azure and Google cloud services. Cloud computing Cloud computing is essentially the delivery of online computing services to customers. As enterprises continually migrate their applications and data to the cloud instead of storing it on local machines, it becomes possible to access resources from different locations. Some of the key services of the AWS ecosystem for cloud applications include storage, database, security tools, and management tools. AWS is among the most popular cloud providers Some of the largest globally operating enterprises use AWS for their cloud services, including Netflix, BBC, and Baidu. Accordingly, AWS is one of the leading cloud providers in the global cloud market. Due to its continuously expanding portfolio of services and deepening of expertise, the company continues to be not only an important cloud service provider but also a business partner.

As of April 2024, it was found that men between the ages of 25 and 34 years made up Facebook largest audience, accounting for 18.4 percent of global users. Additionally, Facebook's second largest audience base could be found with men aged 18 to 24 years.

              Facebook connects the world

              Founded in 2004 and going public in 2012, Facebook is one of the biggest internet companies in the world with influence that goes beyond social media. It is widely considered as one of the Big Four tech companies, along with Google, Apple, and Amazon (all together known under the acronym GAFA). Facebook is the most popular social network worldwide and the company also owns three other billion-user properties: mobile messaging apps WhatsApp and Facebook Messenger,
              as well as photo-sharing app Instagram. Facebook usersThe vast majority of Facebook users connect to the social network via mobile devices. This is unsurprising, as Facebook has many users in mobile-first online markets. Currently, India ranks first in terms of Facebook audience size with 378 million users. The United States, Brazil, and Indonesia also all have more than 100 million Facebook users each.