In the U.S. public companies, certain insiders and broker-dealers are required to regularly file with the SEC. The SEC makes this data available online for anybody to view and use via their Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval (EDGAR) database. The SEC updates this data every quarter going back to January, 2009. To aid analysis a quick summary view of the data has been created that is not available in the original dataset. The quick summary view pulls together signals into a single table that otherwise would have to be joined from multiple tables and enables a more streamlined user experience. This public dataset is hosted in Google BigQuery and is included in BigQuery's 1TB/mo of free tier processing. This means that each user receives 1TB of free BigQuery processing every month, which can be used to run queries on this public dataset. Watch this short video to learn how to get started quickly using BigQuery to access public datasets.詳細

Context

NYC Open Data is an opportunity to engage New Yorkers in the information that is produced and used by City government. We believe that every New Yorker can benefit from Open Data, and Open Data can benefit from every New Yorker. Source: https://opendata.cityofnewyork.us/overview/

Content

Thanks to NYC Open Data, which makes public data generated by city agencies available for public use, and Citi Bike, we've incorporated over 150 GB of data in 5 open datasets into Google BigQuery Public Datasets, including:

• Over 8 million 311 service requests from 2012-2016

• More than 1 million motor vehicle collisions 2012-present

• Citi Bike stations and 30 million Citi Bike trips 2013-present

• Over 1 billion Yellow and Green Taxi rides from 2009-present

• Over 500,000 sidewalk trees surveyed decennially in 1995, 2005, and 2015

This dataset is deprecated and not being updated.

Fork this kernel to get started with this dataset.

Acknowledgements

https://opendata.cityofnewyork.us/

https://cloud.google.com/blog/big-data/2017/01/new-york-city-public-datasets-now-available-on-google-bigquery

This dataset is publicly available for anyone to use under the following terms provided by the Dataset Source - https://data.cityofnewyork.us/ - and is provided "AS IS" without any warranty, express or implied, from Google. Google disclaims all liability for any damages, direct or indirect, resulting from the use of the dataset.

By accessing datasets and feeds available through NYC Open Data, the user agrees to all of the Terms of Use of NYC.gov as well as the Privacy Policy for NYC.gov. The user also agrees to any additional terms of use defined by the agencies, bureaus, and offices providing data. Public data sets made available on NYC Open Data are provided for informational purposes. The City does not warranty the completeness, accuracy, content, or fitness for any particular purpose or use of any public data set made available on NYC Open Data, nor are any such warranties to be implied or inferred with respect to the public data sets furnished therein.

The City is not liable for any deficiencies in the completeness, accuracy, content, or fitness for any particular purpose or use of any public data set, or application utilizing such data set, provided by any third party.

Banner Photo by @bicadmedia from Unplash.

Inspiration

On which New York City streets are you most likely to find a loud party?

Can you find the Virginia Pines in New York City?

Where was the only collision caused by an animal that injured a cyclist?

What’s the Citi Bike record for the Longest Distance in the Shortest Time (on a route with at least 100 rides)?

https://cloud.google.com/blog/big-data/2017/01/images/148467900588042/nyc-dataset-6.png" alt="enter image description here"> https://cloud.google.com/blog/big-data/2017/01/images/148467900588042/nyc-dataset-6.png

In the U.S. public companies, certain insiders and broker-dealers are required to regularly file with the SEC. The SEC makes this data available online for anybody to view and use via their Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval (EDGAR) database. The SEC updates this data every quarter going back to January, 2009. To aid analysis a quick summary view of the data has been created that is not available in the original dataset. The quick summary view pulls together signals into a single table that otherwise would have to be joined from multiple tables and enables a more streamlined user experience. This public dataset is hosted in Google BigQuery and is included in BigQuery's 1TB/mo of free tier processing. This means that each user receives 1TB of free BigQuery processing every month, which can be used to run queries on this public dataset. Watch this short video to learn how to get started quickly using BigQuery to access public datasets.Scopri di più

This is the second version of the Google Landmarks dataset (GLDv2), which contains images annotated with labels representing human-made and natural landmarks. The dataset can be used for landmark recognition and retrieval experiments. This version of the dataset contains approximately 5 million images, split into 3 sets of images: train, index and test

In the U.S. public companies, certain insiders and broker-dealers are required to regularly file with the SEC. The SEC makes this data available online for anybody to view and use via their Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval (EDGAR) database. The SEC updates this data every quarter going back to January, 2009. To aid analysis a quick summary view of the data has been created that is not available in the original dataset. The quick summary view pulls together signals into a single table that otherwise would have to be joined from multiple tables and enables a more streamlined user experience. This public dataset is hosted in Google BigQuery and is included in BigQuery's 1TB/mo of free tier processing. This means that each user receives 1TB of free BigQuery processing every month, which can be used to run queries on this public dataset. Watch this short video to learn how to get started quickly using BigQuery to access public datasets.Dowiedz się więcej

Explore our public notebook content!

Meta Kaggle Code is an extension to our popular Meta Kaggle dataset. This extension contains all the raw source code from hundreds of thousands of public, Apache 2.0 licensed Python and R notebooks versions on Kaggle used to analyze Datasets, make submissions to Competitions, and more. This represents nearly a decade of data spanning a period of tremendous evolution in the ways ML work is done.

Why we’re releasing this dataset

By collecting all of this code created by Kaggle’s community in one dataset, we hope to make it easier for the world to research and share insights about trends in our industry. With the growing significance of AI-assisted development, we expect this data can also be used to fine-tune models for ML-specific code generation tasks.

Meta Kaggle for Code is also a continuation of our commitment to open data and research. This new dataset is a companion to Meta Kaggle which we originally released in 2016. On top of Meta Kaggle, our community has shared nearly 1,000 public code examples. Research papers written using Meta Kaggle have examined how data scientists collaboratively solve problems, analyzed overfitting in machine learning competitions, compared discussions between Kaggle and Stack Overflow communities, and more.

The best part is Meta Kaggle enriches Meta Kaggle for Code. By joining the datasets together, you can easily understand which competitions code was run against, the progression tier of the code’s author, how many votes a notebook had, what kinds of comments it received, and much, much more. We hope the new potential for uncovering deep insights into how ML code is written feels just as limitless to you as it does to us!

Sensitive data

While we have made an attempt to filter out notebooks containing potentially sensitive information published by Kaggle users, the dataset may still contain such information. Research, publications, applications, etc. relying on this data should only use or report on publicly available, non-sensitive information.

Joining with Meta Kaggle

The files contained here are a subset of the KernelVersions in Meta Kaggle. The file names match the ids in the KernelVersions csv file. Whereas Meta Kaggle contains data for all interactive and commit sessions, Meta Kaggle Code contains only data for commit sessions.

File organization

The files are organized into a two-level directory structure. Each top level folder contains up to 1 million files, e.g. - folder 123 contains all versions from 123,000,000 to 123,999,999. Each sub folder contains up to 1 thousand files, e.g. - 123/456 contains all versions from 123,456,000 to 123,456,999. In practice, each folder will have many fewer than 1 thousand files due to private and interactive sessions.

The ipynb files in this dataset hosted on Kaggle do not contain the output cells. If the outputs are required, the full set of ipynbs with the outputs embedded can be obtained from this public GCS bucket: kaggle-meta-kaggle-code-downloads. Note that this is a "requester pays" bucket. This means you will need a GCP account with billing enabled to download. Learn more here: https://cloud.google.com/storage/docs/requester-pays

Questions / Comments

We love feedback! Let us know in the Discussion tab.

Happy Kaggling!

Author: Víctor Yeste. Universitat Politècnica de Valencia.The object of this study is the design of a cybermetric methodology whose objectives are to measure the success of the content published in online media and the possible prediction of the selected success variables.In this case, due to the need to integrate data from two separate areas, such as web publishing and the analysis of their shares and related topics on Twitter, has opted for programming as you access both the Google Analytics v4 reporting API and Twitter Standard API, always respecting the limits of these.The website analyzed is hellofriki.com. It is an online media whose primary intention is to solve the need for information on some topics that provide daily a vast number of news in the form of news, as well as the possibility of analysis, reports, interviews, and many other information formats. All these contents are under the scope of the sections of cinema, series, video games, literature, and comics.This dataset has contributed to the elaboration of the PhD Thesis:Yeste Moreno, VM. (2021). Diseño de una metodología cibermétrica de cálculo del éxito para la optimización de contenidos web [Tesis doctoral]. Universitat Politècnica de València. https://doi.org/10.4995/Thesis/10251/176009Data have been obtained from each last-minute news article published online according to the indicators described in the doctoral thesis. All related data are stored in a database, divided into the following tables:tesis_followers: User ID list of media account followers.tesis_hometimeline: data from tweets posted by the media account sharing breaking news from the web.status_id: Tweet IDcreated_at: date of publicationtext: content of the tweetpath: URL extracted after processing the shortened URL in textpost_shared: Article ID in WordPress that is being sharedretweet_count: number of retweetsfavorite_count: number of favoritestesis_hometimeline_other: data from tweets posted by the media account that do not share breaking news from the web. Other typologies, automatic Facebook shares, custom tweets without link to an article, etc. With the same fields as tesis_hometimeline.tesis_posts: data of articles published by the web and processed for some analysis.stats_id: Analysis IDpost_id: Article ID in WordPresspost_date: article publication date in WordPresspost_title: title of the articlepath: URL of the article in the middle webtags: Tags ID or WordPress tags related to the articleuniquepageviews: unique page viewsentrancerate: input ratioavgtimeonpage: average visit timeexitrate: output ratiopageviewspersession: page views per sessionadsense_adunitsviewed: number of ads viewed by usersadsense_viewableimpressionpercent: ad display ratioadsense_ctr: ad click ratioadsense_ecpm: estimated ad revenue per 1000 page viewstesis_stats: data from a particular analysis, performed at each published breaking news item. Fields with statistical values can be computed from the data in the other tables, but total and average calculations are saved for faster and easier further processing.id: ID of the analysisphase: phase of the thesis in which analysis has been carried out (right now all are 1)time: "0" if at the time of publication, "1" if 14 days laterstart_date: date and time of measurement on the day of publicationend_date: date and time when the measurement is made 14 days latermain_post_id: ID of the published article to be analysedmain_post_theme: Main section of the published article to analyzesuperheroes_theme: "1" if about superheroes, "0" if nottrailer_theme: "1" if trailer, "0" if notname: empty field, possibility to add a custom name manuallynotes: empty field, possibility to add personalized notes manually, as if some tag has been removed manually for being considered too generic, despite the fact that the editor put itnum_articles: number of articles analysednum_articles_with_traffic: number of articles analysed with traffic (which will be taken into account for traffic analysis)num_articles_with_tw_data: number of articles with data from when they were shared on the media’s Twitter accountnum_terms: number of terms analyzeduniquepageviews_total: total page viewsuniquepageviews_mean: average page viewsentrancerate_mean: average input ratioavgtimeonpage_mean: average duration of visitsexitrate_mean: average output ratiopageviewspersession_mean: average page views per sessiontotal: total of ads viewedadsense_adunitsviewed_mean: average of ads viewedadsense_viewableimpressionpercent_mean: average ad display ratioadsense_ctr_mean: average ad click ratioadsense_ecpm_mean: estimated ad revenue per 1000 page viewsTotal: total incomeretweet_count_mean: average incomefavorite_count_total: total of favoritesfavorite_count_mean: average of favoritesterms_ini_num_tweets: total tweets on the terms on the day of publicationterms_ini_retweet_count_total: total retweets on the terms on the day of publicationterms_ini_retweet_count_mean: average retweets on the terms on the day of publicationterms_ini_favorite_count_total: total of favorites on the terms on the day of publicationterms_ini_favorite_count_mean: average of favorites on the terms on the day of publicationterms_ini_followers_talking_rate: ratio of followers of the media Twitter account who have recently published a tweet talking about the terms on the day of publicationterms_ini_user_num_followers_mean: average followers of users who have spoken of the terms on the day of publicationterms_ini_user_num_tweets_mean: average number of tweets published by users who spoke about the terms on the day of publicationterms_ini_user_age_mean: average age in days of users who have spoken of the terms on the day of publicationterms_ini_ur_inclusion_rate: URL inclusion ratio of tweets talking about terms on the day of publicationterms_end_num_tweets: total tweets on terms 14 days after publicationterms_ini_retweet_count_total: total retweets on terms 14 days after publicationterms_ini_retweet_count_mean: average retweets on terms 14 days after publicationterms_ini_favorite_count_total: total bookmarks on terms 14 days after publicationterms_ini_favorite_count_mean: average of favorites on terms 14 days after publicationterms_ini_followers_talking_rate: ratio of media Twitter account followers who have recently posted a tweet talking about the terms 14 days after publicationterms_ini_user_num_followers_mean: average followers of users who have spoken of the terms 14 days after publicationterms_ini_user_num_tweets_mean: average number of tweets published by users who have spoken about the terms 14 days after publicationterms_ini_user_age_mean: the average age in days of users who have spoken of the terms 14 days after publicationterms_ini_ur_inclusion_rate: URL inclusion ratio of tweets talking about terms 14 days after publication.tesis_terms: data of the terms (tags) related to the processed articles.stats_id: Analysis IDtime: "0" if at the time of publication, "1" if 14 days laterterm_id: Term ID (tag) in WordPressname: Name of the termslug: URL of the termnum_tweets: number of tweetsretweet_count_total: total retweetsretweet_count_mean: average retweetsfavorite_count_total: total of favoritesfavorite_count_mean: average of favoritesfollowers_talking_rate: ratio of followers of the media Twitter account who have recently published a tweet talking about the termuser_num_followers_mean: average followers of users who were talking about the termuser_num_tweets_mean: average number of tweets published by users who were talking about the termuser_age_mean: average age in days of users who were talking about the termurl_inclusion_rate: URL inclusion ratio

The Quick Draw Dataset is a collection of 50 million drawings across 345 categories, contributed by players of the game "Quick, Draw!". The drawings were captured as timestamped vectors, tagged with metadata including what the player was asked to draw and in which country the player was located.

Example drawings: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/googlecreativelab/quickdraw-dataset/master/preview.jpg" alt="preview">

In the U.S. public companies, certain insiders and broker-dealers are required to regularly file with the SEC. The SEC makes this data available online for anybody to view and use via their Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval (EDGAR) database. The SEC updates this data every quarter going back to January, 2009. To aid analysis a quick summary view of the data has been created that is not available in the original dataset. The quick summary view pulls together signals into a single table that otherwise would have to be joined from multiple tables and enables a more streamlined user experience. This public dataset is hosted in Google BigQuery and is included in BigQuery's 1TB/mo of free tier processing. This means that each user receives 1TB of free BigQuery processing every month, which can be used to run queries on this public dataset. Watch this short video to learn how to get started quickly using BigQuery to access public datasets.Saiba mais

This noisy speech test set is created from the Google Speech Commands v2 [1] and the Musan dataset[2].

It could be downloaded here: https://zenodo.org/record/6066174#.Yn7NPJPMLyU

Specifically, we created this test set by mixing the speech in the Google Speech Commands v2 test set with random noise in the Musan dataset at different signal to noise ratio -12.5,-10,0,10,20,30 and 40 decibel (dB).

The Google Speech Commands v2 dataset is under the Creative Commons BY 4.0 license. It could be downloaded at: http://download.tensorflow.org/data/speech_commands_v0.02.tar.gz

The Musan dataset is under Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). It could be downlowned at https://www.openslr.org/17/

Citations:

[1] Pete Warden, “Speech commands: A dataset for limited-vocabulary speech recognition,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.03209, 2018.

[2] David Snyder, Guoguo Chen, and Daniel Povey, “Musan: A music, speech, and noise corpus,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1510.08484, 2015.

Covid19Kerala.info-Data is a consolidated multi-source open dataset of metadata from the COVID-19 outbreak in the Indian state of Kerala. It is created and maintained by volunteers of ‘Collective for Open Data Distribution-Keralam’ (CODD-K), a nonprofit consortium of individuals formed for the distribution and longevity of open-datasets. Covid19Kerala.info-Data covers a set of correlated temporal and spatial metadata of SARS-CoV-2 infections and prevention measures in Kerala. Static releases of this dataset snapshots are manually produced from a live database maintained as a set of publicly accessible Google sheets. This dataset is made available under the Open Data Commons Attribution License v1.0 (ODC-BY 1.0).

Schema and data package Datapackage with schema definition is accessible at https://codd-k.github.io/covid19kerala.info-data/datapackage.json. Provided datapackage and schema are based on Frictionless data Data Package specification.

Temporal and Spatial Coverage

This dataset covers COVID-19 outbreak and related data from the state of Kerala, India, from January 31, 2020 till the date of the publication of this snapshot. The dataset shall be maintained throughout the entirety of the COVID-19 outbreak.

The spatial coverage of the data lies within the geographical boundaries of the Kerala state which includes its 14 administrative subdivisions. The state is further divided into Local Self Governing (LSG) Bodies. Reference to this spatial information is included on appropriate data facets. Available spatial information on regions outside Kerala was mentioned, but it is limited as a reference to the possible origins of the infection clusters or movement of the individuals.

Longevity and Provenance

The dataset snapshot releases are published and maintained in a designated GitHub repository maintained by CODD-K team. Periodic snapshots from the live database will be released at regular intervals. The GitHub commit logs for the repository will be maintained as a record of provenance, and archived repository will be maintained at the end of the project lifecycle for the longevity of the dataset.

Data Stewardship

CODD-K expects all administrators, managers, and users of its datasets to manage, access, and utilize them in a manner that is consistent with the consortium’s need for security and confidentiality and relevant legal frameworks within all geographies, especially Kerala and India. As a responsible steward to maintain and make this dataset accessible— CODD-K absolves from all liabilities of the damages, if any caused by inaccuracies in the dataset.

License

This dataset is made available by the CODD-K consortium under ODC-BY 1.0 license. The Open Data Commons Attribution License (ODC-By) v1.0 ensures that users of this dataset are free to copy, distribute and use the dataset to produce works and even to modify, transform and build upon the database, as long as they attribute the public use of the database or works produced from the same, as mentioned in the citation below.

Disclaimer

Covid19Kerala.info-Data is provided under the ODC-BY 1.0 license as-is. Though every attempt is taken to ensure that the data is error-free and up to date, the CODD-K consortium do not bear any responsibilities for inaccuracies in the dataset or any losses—monetary or otherwise—that users of this dataset may incur.

Google's AudioSet consistently reformatted

During my work with Google's AudioSet(https://research.google.com/audioset/index.html)
I encountered some problems due to the fact that Weak (https://research.google.com/audioset/download.html) and
 Strong (https://research.google.com/audioset/download_strong.html) versions of the dataset used different csv formatting for the data, and that also labels used in the two datasets are different (https://github.com/audioset/ontology/issues/9) and also presented in files with different formatting.

This dataset reformatting aims to unify the formats of the datasets so that it is possible
to analyse them in the same pipelines, and also make the dataset files compatible
with psds_eval, dcase_util and sed_eval Python packages used in Audio Processing.

For better formatted documentation and source code of reformatting refer to https://github.com/bakhtos/GoogleAudioSetReformatted 

-Changes in dataset

All files are converted to tab-separated `*.tsv` files (i.e. `csv` files with `\t`
as a separator). All files have a header as the first line.

-New fields and filenames

Fields are renamed according to the following table, to be compatible with psds_eval:

Old field -> New field
YTID -> filename
segment_id -> filename
start_seconds -> onset
start_time_seconds -> onset
end_seconds -> offset
end_time_seconds -> offset
positive_labels -> event_label
label -> event_label
present -> present

For class label files, `id` is now the name for the for `mid` label (e.g. `/m/09xor`)
and `label` for the human-readable label (e.g. `Speech`). Index of label indicated
for Weak dataset labels (`index` field in `class_labels_indices.csv`) is not used.

Files are renamed according to the following table to ensure consisted naming
of the form `audioset_[weak|strong]_[train|eval]_[balanced|unbalanced|posneg]*.tsv`:

Old name -> New name
balanced_train_segments.csv -> audioset_weak_train_balanced.tsv
unbalanced_train_segments.csv -> audioset_weak_train_unbalanced.tsv
eval_segments.csv -> audioset_weak_eval.tsv
audioset_train_strong.tsv -> audioset_strong_train.tsv
audioset_eval_strong.tsv -> audioset_strong_eval.tsv
audioset_eval_strong_framed_posneg.tsv -> audioset_strong_eval_posneg.tsv
class_labels_indices.csv -> class_labels.tsv (merged with mid_to_display_name.tsv)
mid_to_display_name.tsv -> class_labels.tsv (merged with class_labels_indices.csv)

-Strong dataset changes

Only changes to the Strong dataset are renaming of fields and reordering of columns,
so that both Weak and Strong version have `filename` and `event_label` as first 
two columns.

-Weak dataset changes

-- Labels are given one per line, instead of comma-separated and quoted list

-- To make sure that `filename` format is the same as in Strong version, the following
format change is made:
The value of the `start_seconds` field is converted to milliseconds and appended to the `filename` with an underscore. Since all files in the dataset are assumed to be 10 seconds long, this unifies the format of `filename` with the Strong version and makes `end_seconds` also redundant.

-Class labels changes

Class labels from both datasets are merged into one file and given in alphabetical order of `id`s. Since same `id`s are present in both datasets, but sometimes with different human-readable labels, labels from Strong dataset overwrite those from Weak. It is possible to regenerate `class_labels.tsv` while giving priority to the Weak version of labels by calling `convert_labels(False)` from convert.py in the GitHub repository.

-License

Google's AudioSet was published in two stages - first the Weakly labelled data (Gemmeke, Jort F., et al. "Audio set: An ontology and human-labeled dataset for audio events." 2017 IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech and signal processing (ICASSP). IEEE, 2017.), then the strongly labelled data (Hershey, Shawn, et al. "The benefit of temporally-strong labels in audio event classification." ICASSP 2021-2021 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). IEEE, 2021.)

Both the original dataset and this reworked version are licensed under [CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Class labels come from the AudioSet Ontology, which is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0.

Context

Google, one of the greatest gifts to mankind. Any information that you need today is available on Google. Google is a household name and literally, everyone is aware of what Google is. It helps you get resources for your school projects, helps you shop online and much more. Google has made getting an education a lot easier for people across the globe. No matter where you are, you can access google provided you have internet. Every piece of info is available on google and it's all one click away. But Google has a parent company known as Alphabet Inc. that trades and here we have stock data from A Alphabet Inc.

Content

This data set has 7 columns with all the necessary values such as the opening price of the stock, the closing price of it, its highest in the day and much more. It has date wise data of the stock starting from 2004 to 2023(October).

This dataset contains data collected during a study ("Towards High-Value Datasets determination for data-driven development: a systematic literature review") conducted by Anastasija Nikiforova (University of Tartu), Nina Rizun, Magdalena Ciesielska (Gdańsk University of Technology), Charalampos Alexopoulos (University of the Aegean) and Andrea Miletič (University of Zagreb) It being made public both to act as supplementary data for "Towards High-Value Datasets determination for data-driven development: a systematic literature review" paper (pre-print is available in Open Access here -> https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.10234) and in order for other researchers to use these data in their own work.

The protocol is intended for the Systematic Literature review on the topic of High-value Datasets with the aim to gather information on how the topic of High-value datasets (HVD) and their determination has been reflected in the literature over the years and what has been found by these studies to date, incl. the indicators used in them, involved stakeholders, data-related aspects, and frameworks. The data in this dataset were collected in the result of the SLR over Scopus, Web of Science, and Digital Government Research library (DGRL) in 2023.

Methodology

To understand how HVD determination has been reflected in the literature over the years and what has been found by these studies to date, all relevant literature covering this topic has been studied. To this end, the SLR was carried out to by searching digital libraries covered by Scopus, Web of Science (WoS), Digital Government Research library (DGRL).

These databases were queried for keywords ("open data" OR "open government data") AND ("high-value data*" OR "high value data*"), which were applied to the article title, keywords, and abstract to limit the number of papers to those, where these objects were primary research objects rather than mentioned in the body, e.g., as a future work. After deduplication, 11 articles were found unique and were further checked for relevance. As a result, a total of 9 articles were further examined. Each study was independently examined by at least two authors.

To attain the objective of our study, we developed the protocol, where the information on each selected study was collected in four categories: (1) descriptive information, (2) approach- and research design- related information, (3) quality-related information, (4) HVD determination-related information.

Test procedure Each study was independently examined by at least two authors, where after the in-depth examination of the full-text of the article, the structured protocol has been filled for each study. The structure of the survey is available in the supplementary file available (see Protocol_HVD_SLR.odt, Protocol_HVD_SLR.docx) The data collected for each study by two researchers were then synthesized in one final version by the third researcher.

Description of the data in this data set

Protocol_HVD_SLR provides the structure of the protocol Spreadsheets #1 provides the filled protocol for relevant studies. Spreadsheet#2 provides the list of results after the search over three indexing databases, i.e. before filtering out irrelevant studies

The information on each selected study was collected in four categories: (1) descriptive information, (2) approach- and research design- related information, (3) quality-related information, (4) HVD determination-related information

Descriptive information
1) Article number - a study number, corresponding to the study number assigned in an Excel worksheet 2) Complete reference - the complete source information to refer to the study 3) Year of publication - the year in which the study was published 4) Journal article / conference paper / book chapter - the type of the paper -{journal article, conference paper, book chapter} 5) DOI / Website- a link to the website where the study can be found 6) Number of citations - the number of citations of the article in Google Scholar, Scopus, Web of Science 7) Availability in OA - availability of an article in the Open Access 8) Keywords - keywords of the paper as indicated by the authors 9) Relevance for this study - what is the relevance level of the article for this study? {high / medium / low}

Approach- and research design-related information 10) Objective / RQ - the research objective / aim, established research questions 11) Research method (including unit of analysis) - the methods used to collect data, including the unit of analy-sis (country, organisation, specific unit that has been ana-lysed, e.g., the number of use-cases, scope of the SLR etc.) 12) Contributions - the contributions of the study 13) Method - whether the study uses a qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods approach? 14) Availability of the underlying research data- whether there is a reference to the publicly available underly-ing research data e.g., transcriptions of interviews, collected data, or explanation why these data are not shared? 15) Period under investigation - period (or moment) in which the study was conducted 16) Use of theory / theoretical concepts / approaches - does the study mention any theory / theoretical concepts / approaches? If any theory is mentioned, how is theory used in the study?

Quality- and relevance- related information
17) Quality concerns - whether there are any quality concerns (e.g., limited infor-mation about the research methods used)? 18) Primary research object - is the HVD a primary research object in the study? (primary - the paper is focused around the HVD determination, sec-ondary - mentioned but not studied (e.g., as part of discus-sion, future work etc.))

HVD determination-related information
19) HVD definition and type of value - how is the HVD defined in the article and / or any other equivalent term? 20) HVD indicators - what are the indicators to identify HVD? How were they identified? (components & relationships, “input -> output") 21) A framework for HVD determination - is there a framework presented for HVD identification? What components does it consist of and what are the rela-tionships between these components? (detailed description) 22) Stakeholders and their roles - what stakeholders or actors does HVD determination in-volve? What are their roles? 23) Data - what data do HVD cover? 24) Level (if relevant) - what is the level of the HVD determination covered in the article? (e.g., city, regional, national, international)

Format of the file .xls, .csv (for the first spreadsheet only), .odt, .docx

Licenses or restrictions CC-BY

For more info, see README.txt

Company Datasets for valuable business insights!

Discover new business prospects, identify investment opportunities, track competitor performance, and streamline your sales efforts with comprehensive Company Datasets.

These datasets are sourced from top industry providers, ensuring you have access to high-quality information:

• Owler: Gain valuable business insights and competitive intelligence. -AngelList: Receive fresh startup data transformed into actionable insights. -CrunchBase: Access clean, parsed, and ready-to-use business data from private and public companies. -Craft.co: Make data-informed business decisions with Craft.co's company datasets. -Product Hunt: Harness the Product Hunt dataset, a leader in curating the best new products.

We provide fresh and ready-to-use company data, eliminating the need for complex scraping and parsing. Our data includes crucial details such as:

• Company name;
• Size;
• Founding date;
• Location;
• Industry;
• Revenue;
• Employee count;
• Competitors.

You can choose your preferred data delivery method, including various storage options, delivery frequency, and input/output formats.

Receive datasets in CSV, JSON, and other formats, with storage options like AWS S3 and Google Cloud Storage. Opt for one-time, monthly, quarterly, or bi-annual data delivery.

With Oxylabs Datasets, you can count on:

• Fresh and accurate data collected and parsed by our expert web scraping team.
• Time and resource savings, allowing you to focus on data analysis and achieving your business goals.
• A customized approach tailored to your specific business needs.
• Legal compliance in line with GDPR and CCPA standards, thanks to our membership in the Ethical Web Data Collection Initiative.

Pricing Options:

Standard Datasets: choose from various ready-to-use datasets with standardized data schemas, priced from $1,000/month.

Custom Datasets: Tailor datasets from any public web domain to your unique business needs. Contact our sales team for custom pricing.

Experience a seamless journey with Oxylabs:

• Understanding your data needs: We work closely to understand your business nature and daily operations, defining your unique data requirements.
• Developing a customized solution: Our experts create a custom framework to extract public data using our in-house web scraping infrastructure.
• Delivering data sample: We provide a sample for your feedback on data quality and the entire delivery process.
• Continuous data delivery: We continuously collect public data and deliver custom datasets per the agreed frequency.

Unlock the power of data with Oxylabs' Company Datasets and supercharge your business insights today!

Dataset Card for Evaluation run of google/gemma-7b-it

Dataset automatically created during the evaluation run of model google/gemma-7b-it The dataset is composed of 44 configuration(s), each one corresponding to one of the evaluated task. The dataset has been created from 6 run(s). Each run can be found as a specific split in each configuration, the split being named using the timestamp of the run.The "train" split is always pointing to the latest results. An additional… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/open-llm-leaderboard/google_gemma-7b-it-details.

Dataset Card for Evaluation run of google/mt5-xxl

Dataset automatically created during the evaluation run of model google/mt5-xxl The dataset is composed of 38 configuration(s), each one corresponding to one of the evaluated task. The dataset has been created from 1 run(s). Each run can be found as a specific split in each configuration, the split being named using the timestamp of the run.The "train" split is always pointing to the latest results. An additional configuration… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/open-llm-leaderboard/google_mt5-xxl-details.

Dataset Card for Evaluation run of google/flan-t5-xxl

Dataset automatically created during the evaluation run of model google/flan-t5-xxl The dataset is composed of 38 configuration(s), each one corresponding to one of the evaluated task. The dataset has been created from 1 run(s). Each run can be found as a specific split in each configuration, the split being named using the timestamp of the run.The "train" split is always pointing to the latest results. An additional… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/open-llm-leaderboard/google_flan-t5-xxl-details.

Dataset Card for Evaluation run of google/mt5-base

Dataset automatically created during the evaluation run of model google/mt5-base The dataset is composed of 38 configuration(s), each one corresponding to one of the evaluated task. The dataset has been created from 1 run(s). Each run can be found as a specific split in each configuration, the split being named using the timestamp of the run.The "train" split is always pointing to the latest results. An additional configuration… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/open-llm-leaderboard/google_mt5-base-details.

This is the dataset used for paper: "A Recommender System of Buggy App Checkers for App Store Moderators", published on the International Conference on Mobile Software Engineering and Systems (MOBILESoft) in 2015.

Dataset Collection We built a dataset that consists of a random sample of Android app metadata and user reviews available on the Google Play Store on January and March 2014. Since the Google Play Store is continuously evolving (adding, removing and/or updating apps), we updated the dataset twice. The dataset D1 contains available apps in the Google Play Store in January 2014. Then, we created a new snapshot (D2) of the Google Play Store in March 2014.

The apps belong to the 27 different categories defined by Google (at the time of writing the paper), and the 4 predefined subcategories (free, paid, new_free, and new_paid). For each category-subcategory pair (e.g. tools-free, tools-paid, sports-new_free, etc.), we collected a maximum of 500 samples, resulting in a median number of 1.978 apps per category.

For each app, we retrieved the following metadata: name, package, creator, version code, version name, number of downloads, size, upload date, star rating, star counting, and the set of permission requests.

In addition, for each app, we collected up to a maximum of the latest 500 reviews posted by users in the Google Play Store. For each review, we retrieved its metadata: title, description, device, and version of the app. None of these fields were mandatory, thus several reviews lack some of these details. From all the reviews attached to an app, we only considered the reviews associated with the latest version of the app —i.e., we discarded unversioned and old-versioned reviews. Thus, resulting in a corpus of 1,402,717 reviews (2014 Jan.).

Dataset Stats Some stats about the datasets:

• D1 (Jan. 2014) contains 38,781 apps requesting 7,826 different permissions, and 1,402,717 user reviews.

• D2 (Mar. 2014) contains 46,644 apps and 9,319 different permission requests, and 1,361,319 user reviews.

Additional stats about the datasets are available here.

Dataset Description To store the dataset, we created a graph database with Neo4j. This dataset therefore consists of a graph describing the apps as nodes and edges. We chose a graph database because the graph visualization helps to identify connections among data (e.g., clusters of apps sharing similar sets of permission requests).

In particular, our dataset graph contains six types of nodes: - APP nodes containing metadata of each app, - PERMISSION nodes describing permission types, - CATEGORY nodes describing app categories, - SUBCATEGORY nodes describing app subcategories, - USER_REVIEW nodes storing user reviews. - TOPIC topics mined from user reviews (using LDA).

Furthermore, there are five types of relationships between APP nodes and each of the remaining nodes:

• USES_PERMISSION relationships between APP and PERMISSION nodes
• HAS_REVIEW between APP and USER_REVIEW nodes
• HAS_TOPIC between USER_REVIEW and TOPIC nodes
• BELONGS_TO_CATEGORY between APP and CATEGORY nodes
• BELONGS_TO_SUBCATEGORY between APP and SUBCATEGORY nodes

Dataset Files Info

Neo4j 2.0 Databases

googlePlayDB1-Jan2014_neo4j_2_0.rar

googlePlayDB2-Mar2014_neo4j_2_0.rar We provide two Neo4j databases containing the 2 snapshots of the Google Play Store (January and March 2014). These are the original databases created for the paper. The databases were created with Neo4j 2.0. In particular with the tool version 'Neo4j 2.0.0-M06 Community Edition' (latest version available at the time of implementing the paper in 2014).

Neo4j 3.5 Databases

googlePlayDB1-Jan2014_neo4j_3_5_28.rar

googlePlayDB2-Mar2014_neo4j_3_5_28.rar Currently, the version Neo4j 2.0 is deprecated and it is not available for download in the official Neo4j Download Center. We have migrated the original databases (Neo4j 2.0) to Neo4j 3.5.28. The databases can be opened with the tool version: 'Neo4j Community Edition 3.5.28'. The tool can be downloaded from the official Neo4j Donwload page.

  In order to open the databases with more recent versions of Neo4j, the databases must be first migrated to the corresponding version. Instructions about the migration process can be found in the Neo4j Migration Guide.

  First time the Neo4j database is connected, it could request credentials. The username and pasword are: neo4j/neo4j