About this dataset

Context

The dataset presents median household incomes for various household sizes in New Canada, Maine, as reported by the U.S. Census Bureau. The dataset highlights the variation in median household income with the size of the family unit, offering valuable insights into economic trends and disparities within different household sizes, aiding in data analysis and decision-making.

Key observations

• Of the 7 household sizes (1 person to 7-or-more person households) reported by the census bureau, New Canada town did not include 6, or 7-person households. Across the different household sizes in New Canada town the mean income is $103,835, and the standard deviation is $59,699. The coefficient of variation (CV) is 57.49%. This high CV indicates high relative variability, suggesting that the incomes vary significantly across different sizes of households.
• In the most recent year, 2021, The smallest household size for which the bureau reported a median household income was 1-person households, with an income of $16,552. It then further increased to $136,465 for 5-person households, the largest household size for which the bureau reported a median household income.

https://i.neilsberg.com/ch/new-canada-me-median-household-income-by-household-size.jpeg" alt="New Canada, Maine median household income, by household size (in 2022 inflation-adjusted dollars)">

Content

When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2017-2021 5-Year Estimates.

Household Sizes:

• 1-person households
• 2-person households
• 3-person households
• 4-person households
• 5-person households
• 6-person households
• 7-or-more-person households

Variables / Data Columns

• Household Size: This column showcases 7 household sizes ranging from 1-person households to 7-or-more-person households (As mentioned above).
• Median Household Income: Median household income, in 2022 inflation-adjusted dollars for the specific household size.

Good to know

Margin of Error

Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.

Custom data

If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.

Inspiration

Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.

Recommended for further research

This dataset is a part of the main dataset for New Canada town median household income. You can refer the same here

About this dataset

Context

The dataset presents median household incomes for various household sizes in Little Canada, MN, as reported by the U.S. Census Bureau. The dataset highlights the variation in median household income with the size of the family unit, offering valuable insights into economic trends and disparities within different household sizes, aiding in data analysis and decision-making.

Key observations

• Of the 7 household sizes (1 person to 7-or-more person households) reported by the census bureau, Little Canada did not include 7-person households. Across the different household sizes in Little Canada the mean income is $100,789, and the standard deviation is $44,773. The coefficient of variation (CV) is 44.42%. This high CV indicates high relative variability, suggesting that the incomes vary significantly across different sizes of households.
• In the most recent year, 2021, The smallest household size for which the bureau reported a median household income was 1-person households, with an income of $40,881. It then further increased to $110,552 for 6-person households, the largest household size for which the bureau reported a median household income.

https://i.neilsberg.com/ch/little-canada-mn-median-household-income-by-household-size.jpeg" alt="Little Canada, MN median household income, by household size (in 2022 inflation-adjusted dollars)">

Content

When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2017-2021 5-Year Estimates.

Household Sizes:

• 1-person households
• 2-person households
• 3-person households
• 4-person households
• 5-person households
• 6-person households
• 7-or-more-person households

Variables / Data Columns

• Household Size: This column showcases 7 household sizes ranging from 1-person households to 7-or-more-person households (As mentioned above).
• Median Household Income: Median household income, in 2022 inflation-adjusted dollars for the specific household size.

Good to know

Margin of Error

Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.

Custom data

If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.

Inspiration

Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.

Recommended for further research

This dataset is a part of the main dataset for Little Canada median household income. You can refer the same here

This dataset contains a (mostly) complete set of results from marathons across the United States and Canada in 2024.

The dataset is restricted to races with more than 200 finishers. Some races are therefore excluded, but they account for a small share of the total number of finishers.

The dataset is also restricted to races that are USATF-certified. Most of the races are road marathons, although some trail races are included. But these are "road-like" trail marathons, where times are similar to the road and can be used for Boston qualifying purposes.

This dataset is similar to the one I created with results from 2023. The two datasets can be combined, but the race names differ in some cases. You'll have to clean up the race names to get them to group correctly.

I initially collected these results to prepare the dataset for the 2026 Boston Marathon Cutoff Time Tracker. I also used it to update my percentile-based age grade calculator, to calculate the average marathon times for each age group, to identify a list of the largest races in the United States, and to support various other analyses.

If time permits, I plan to update this dataset to include additional information about each race - including the location and the weather on race day.

Monthly average retail prices for selected products, for Canada and provinces. Prices are presented for the current month and the previous four months. Prices are based on transaction data from Canadian retailers, and are presented in Canadian current dollars.

NOAA is responsible for depicting on its nautical charts the limits of the 12 nautical mile Territorial Sea, 24 nautical mile Contiguous Zone, and 200 nautical mile Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ). The outer limit of each of these zones is measured from the U.S. normal baseline, which coincides with the low water line depicted on NOAA charts and includes closing lines across the entrances of legal bays and rivers, consistent with international law. The U.S. baseline and associated maritime limits are reviewed and approved through the interagency U.S. Baseline Committee, which is chaired by the U.S. Department of State. The Committee serves the function of gaining interagency consensus on the proper location of the baseline using the provisions of the 1958 Convention on the Territorial Sea and the Contiguous Zone, to ensure that the seaward extent of U.S. maritime zones do not exceed the breadth that is permitted by international law. In 2002 and in response to mounting requests for digital maritime zones, NOAA launched a project to re-evaluate the U.S. baseline in partnership with other federal agencies via the U.S. Baseline Committee. The focus of the baseline evaluation was NOAA's largest scale, most recent edition nautical charts as well as supplemental source materials for verification of certain charted features. This dataset is a result of the 2002-present initiative and reflects a multi-year iterative project whereby the baseline and associated maritime limits were re-evaluated on a state or regional basis. In addition to the U.S. maritime limits, the U.S. maritime boundaries with opposite or adjacent countries as well as the US/Canada International Boundary (on land and through the Great Lakes) are also included in this dataset. The primary purpose of this dataset is to update the official depiction of these maritime zones and maritime boundaries on NOAA's nautical charts. The limits of these zones are subject to modification, as represented on future charts. The limits shown on the most recent chart edition take precedence.View Dataset on the Gateway

On the continental scale, climate is an important determinant of the distributions of plant taxa and ecoregions. To quantify and depict the relations between specific climate variables and these distributions, we placed modern climate and plant taxa distribution data on an approximately 25-kilometer (km) equal-area grid with 27,984 points that cover Canada and the continental United States (Thompson and others, 2015). The gridded climatic data include annual and monthly temperature and precipitation, as well as bioclimatic variables (growing degree days, mean temperatures of the coldest and warmest months, and a moisture index) based on 1961-1990 30-year mean values from the University of East Anglia (UK) Climatic Research Unit (CRU) CL 2.0 dataset (New and others, 2002), and absolute minimum and maximum temperatures for 1951-1980 interpolated from climate-station data (WeatherDisc Associates, 1989). As described below, these data were used to produce portions of the "Atlas of relations between climatic parameters and distributions of important trees and shrubs in North America" (hereafter referred to as "the Atlas"; Thompson and others, 1999a, 1999b, 2000, 2006, 2007, 2012a, 2015). Evolution of the Atlas Over the 16 Years Between Volumes A & B and G: The Atlas evolved through time as technology improved and our knowledge expanded. The climate data employed in the first five Atlas volumes were replaced by more standard and better documented data in the last two volumes (Volumes F and G; Thompson and others, 2012a, 2015). Similarly, the plant distribution data used in Volumes A through D (Thompson and others, 1999a, 1999b, 2000, 2006) were improved for the latter volumes. However, the digitized ecoregion boundaries used in Volume E (Thompson and others, 2007) remain unchanged. Also, as we and others used the data in Atlas Volumes A through E, we came to realize that the plant distribution and climate data for areas south of the US-Mexico border were not of sufficient quality or resolution for our needs and these data are not included in this data release. The data in this data release are provided in comma-separated values (.csv) files. We also provide netCDF (.nc) files containing the climate and bioclimatic data, grouped taxa and species presence-absence data, and ecoregion assignment data for each grid point (but not the country, state, province, and county assignment data for each grid point, which are available in the .csv files). The netCDF files contain updated Albers conical equal-area projection details and more precise grid-point locations. When the original approximately 25-km equal-area grid was created (ca. 1990), it was designed to be registered with existing data sets, and only 3 decimal places were recorded for the grid-point latitude and longitude values (these original 3-decimal place latitude and longitude values are in the .csv files). In addition, the Albers conical equal-area projection used for the grid was modified to match projection irregularities of the U.S. Forest Service atlases (e.g., Little, 1971, 1976, 1977) from which plant taxa distribution data were digitized. For the netCDF files, we have updated the Albers conical equal-area projection parameters and recalculated the grid-point latitudes and longitudes to 6 decimal places. The additional precision in the location data produces maximum differences between the 6-decimal place and the original 3-decimal place values of up to 0.00266 degrees longitude (approximately 143.8 m along the projection x-axis of the grid) and up to 0.00123 degrees latitude (approximately 84.2 m along the projection y-axis of the grid). The maximum straight-line distance between a three-decimal-point and six-decimal-point grid-point location is 144.2 m. Note that we have not regridded the elevation, climate, grouped taxa and species presence-absence data, or ecoregion data to the locations defined by the new 6-decimal place latitude and longitude data. For example, the climate data described in the Atlas publications were interpolated to the grid-point locations defined by the original 3-decimal place latitude and longitude values. Interpolating the data to the 6-decimal place latitude and longitude values would in many cases not result in changes to the reported values and for other grid points the changes would be small and insignificant. Similarly, if the digitized Little (1971, 1976, 1977) taxa distribution maps were regridded using the 6-decimal place latitude and longitude values, the changes to the gridded distributions would be minor, with a small number of grid points along the edge of a taxa's digitized distribution potentially changing value from taxa "present" to taxa "absent" (or vice versa). These changes should be considered within the spatial margin of error for the taxa distributions, which are based on hand-drawn maps with the distributions evidently generalized, or represented by a small, filled circle, and these distributions were subsequently hand digitized. Users wanting to use data that exactly match the data in the Atlas volumes should use the 3-decimal place latitude and longitude data provided in the .csv files in this data release to represent the center point of each grid cell. Users for whom an offset of up to 144.2 m from the original grid-point location is acceptable (e.g., users investigating continental-scale questions) or who want to easily visualize the data may want to use the data associated with the 6-decimal place latitude and longitude values in the netCDF files. The variable names in the netCDF files generally match those in the data release .csv files, except where the .csv file variable name contains a forward slash, colon, period, or comma (i.e., "/", ":", ".", or ","). In the netCDF file variable short names, the forward slashes are replaced with an underscore symbol (i.e., "_") and the colons, periods, and commas are deleted. In the netCDF file variable long names, the punctuation in the name matches that in the .csv file variable names. The "country", "state, province, or territory", and "county" data in the .csv files are not included in the netCDF files. Data included in this release: - Geographic scope. The gridded data cover an area that we labelled as "CANUSA", which includes Canada and the USA (excluding Hawaii, Puerto Rico, and other oceanic islands). Note that the maps displayed in the Atlas volumes are cropped at their northern edge and do not display the full northern extent of the data included in this data release. - Elevation. The elevation data were regridded from the ETOPO5 data set (National Geophysical Data Center, 1993). There were 35 coastal grid points in our CANUSA study area grid for which the regridded elevations were below sea level and these grid points were assigned missing elevation values (i.e., elevation = 9999). The grid points with missing elevation values occur in five coastal areas: (1) near San Diego (California, USA; 1 grid point), (2) Vancouver Island (British Columbia, Canada) and the Olympic Peninsula (Washington, USA; 2 grid points), (3) the Haida Gwaii (formerly Queen Charlotte Islands, British Columbia, Canada) and southeast Alaska (USA, 9 grid points), (4) the Canadian Arctic Archipelago (22 grid points), and (5) Newfoundland (Canada; 1 grid point). - Climate. The gridded climatic data provided here are based on the 1961-1990 30-year mean values from the University of East Anglia (UK) Climatic Research Unit (CRU) CL 2.0 dataset (New and others, 2002), and include annual and monthly temperature and precipitation. The CRU CL 2.0 data were interpolated onto the approximately 25-km grid using geographically-weighted regression, incorporating local lapse-rate estimation and correction. Additional bioclimatic variables (growing degree days on a 5 degrees Celsius base, mean temperatures of the coldest and warmest months, and a moisture index calculated as actual evapotranspiration divided by potential evapotranspiration) were calculated using the interpolated CRU CL 2.0 data. Also included are absolute minimum and maximum temperatures for 1951-1980 interpolated in a similar fashion from climate-station data (WeatherDisc Associates, 1989). These climate and bioclimate data were used in Atlas volumes F and G (see Thompson and others, 2015, for a description of the methods used to create the gridded climate data). Note that for grid points with missing elevation values (i.e., elevation values equal to 9999), climate data were created using an elevation value of -120 meters. Users may want to exclude these climate data from their analyses (see the Usage Notes section in the data release readme file). - Plant distributions. The gridded plant distribution data align with Atlas volume G (Thompson and others, 2015). Plant distribution data on the grid include 690 species, as well as 67 groups of related species and genera, and are based on U.S. Forest Service atlases (e.g., Little, 1971, 1976, 1977), regional atlases (e.g., Benson and Darrow, 1981), and new maps based on information available from herbaria and other online and published sources (for a list of sources, see Tables 3 and 4 in Thompson and others, 2015). See the "Notes" column in Table 1 (https://pubs.usgs.gov/pp/p1650-g/table1.html) and Table 2 (https://pubs.usgs.gov/pp/p1650-g/table2.html) in Thompson and others (2015) for important details regarding the species and grouped taxa distributions. - Ecoregions. The ecoregion gridded data are the same as in Atlas volumes D and E (Thompson and others, 2006, 2007), and include three different systems, Bailey's ecoregions (Bailey, 1997, 1998), WWF's ecoregions (Ricketts and others, 1999), and Kuchler's potential natural vegetation regions (Kuchler, 1985), that are each based on distinctive approaches to categorizing ecoregions. For the Bailey and WWF ecoregions for North America and the Kuchler potential natural vegetation regions for the contiguous United States (i.e.,

The 1966-2023 North American Breeding Bird Survey (BBS) dataset contains avian point count data for more than 700 North American bird taxa (species, races, and unidentified species groupings). These data are collected annually during the breeding season, primarily in June, along thousands of randomly established roadside survey routes in the United States and Canada. Routes are roughly 24.5 miles (39.2 km) long with counting locations placed at approximately half-mile (800-m) intervals, for a total of 50 stops. At each stop, a citizen scientist highly skilled in avian identification conducts a 3-minute point count, recording all birds seen within a quarter-mile (400-m) radius and all birds heard. Surveys begin 30 minutes before local sunrise and take approximately 5 hours to complete. Routes are surveyed once per year, with the total number of routes sampled per year growing over time; just over 500 routes were sampled in 1966, while in recent decades approximately 3000 routes have been sampled annually. No data are provided for 2020. BBS field activities were cancelled in 2020 because of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) global pandemic and observers were directed to not sample routes. In addition to avian count data, this dataset also contains survey date, survey start and end times, start and end weather conditions, a unique observer identification number, route identification information, and route location information including country, state, and BCR, as well as geographic coordinates of route start point, and an indicator of run data quality.

Context

Its been two years since the news that Canada has legalized weed hit us, so I was like why don't we get a dataset from Kaggle to practice a bit of data analysis and to my surprise I cannot find a weed dataset which reflects the economics behind legalized weed and how it has changed over time ,so I just went to the Canadian govt data site , and ola they have CSV files on exactly what I wanted floating around on their website and all I did was to download it straight up, and here I am to share it with the community.

Content

We have a series of CSV files each having data about things like supply, use case, production, etc but before we go into the individual files there are a few data columns which are common to all csv files

• Ref_date: Reference period for the series being released
• Dimension Name: Name of dimension. There can be up to 10 dimensions in a data table.
• DGUID: Dissemination Geography Unique Identifier.
• Unit of measure: The unit of measure applied to a member given in the text. There can be multiple units of measure in a table.
• Unit of measure ID: The unique reference code associated with a particular unit of measure.
• Scalar factor: The scalar factor associated with a data series, displayed as text. There can be multiple scalar factors in a table.
• Scalar_ID: The unique numeric reference code associated with a particular scalar factor.
• Vector: Unique variable length reference code time-series identifier, consisting of the letter 'V', followed by up to 10 digits.
• Coordinate: Concatenation of the member ID values for each dimension.
• Status: Shows various states of a data value using symbols. These symbols are described in the symbol legend and notes contained in the metadata file. Some symbols accompany a data value while others replace a data value. i.e. – A, B, C, D, E, F,.., X, 0s
• Symbol: Describes data points that are preliminary or revised, displayed using the symbols p and r. These symbols accompany a data.

Understanding metadata files:

Cube Title: The title of the table. The output files are unilingual and thus will contain either the English or French title.

Product Id (PID): The unique 8 digit product identifier for the table.

CANSIM Id: The ID number which formally identified the table in CANSIM. (where applicable)

URL: The URL for the representative (default) view of a given data table.

Cube Notes: Each note is assigned a unique number. This field indicates which notes, if any, are applied to the entire table.

Archive Status: Describes the status of a table as either 'Current' or 'Archived'. Archived tables are those that are no longer updated.

Frequency: Frequency of the table. (i.e. annual)

Start Reference Period: The starting reference period for the table.

End Reference Period: The end reference period for the table.

Total Number of Dimensions: The total number of dimensions contained in the table.

Dimension Name: The name of a dimension in a table. There can be up to 10 dimensions in a table. (i.e. – Geography)

Dimension ID: The reference code assigned to a dimension in a table. A unique reference Dimension ID code is assigned to each dimension in a table.

Dimension Notes: Each note is assigned a unique number. This field indicates which notes are applied to a particular dimension.

Dimension Definitions: Reserved for future development.

Member Name: The textual description of the members in a dimension. (i.e. – Nova Scotia, Ontario (members of the Geography dimension))

Member ID: The code assigned to a member of a dimension. There is a unique ID for each member within a dimension. These IDs are used to create the coordinate field in the data file. (see the 'coordinate' field in the data record layout).

Classification (where applicable): Classification code for a member. Definitions, data sources and methods

Parent Member ID: The code used to display the hierarchical relationship between members in a dimension. (i.e. – The member Ontario (5) is a child of the member Canada (1) in the dimension 'Geography')

Terminated: Indicates whether a member has been terminated or not. Terminated members are those that are no longer updated.

Member Notes: Each note is assigned a unique number. This field indicates which notes are applied to each member.

Member definitions: Reserved for future development.

Symbol Legend: The symbol legend provides descriptions of the various symbols which can appear in a table. This field describes a comprehensive list of all possible symbols, regardless of whether a selected symbol appears in a particular table.

Survey Code: The unique code associated with a survey or program from which the data in the table is derived. Data displayed in one table may be derived ...

A joint venture involving the National Atlas programs in Canada (Natural Resources Canada), Mexico (Instituto Nacional de Estad stica Geograf a e Inform tica), and the United States (U.S. Geological Survey), as well as the North American Commission for Environmental Co-operation, has led to the release (June 2004) of several new products: an updated paper map of North America, and its associated geospatial data sets and their metadata. These data sets are available online from each of the partner countries both for visualization and download. The North American Atlas data are standardized geospatial data sets at 1:10,000,000 scale. A variety of basic data layers (e.g. roads, railroads, populated places, political boundaries, hydrography, bathymetry, sea ice and glaciers) have been integrated so that their relative positions are correct. This collection of data sets forms a base with which other North American thematic data may be integrated. Any data outside of Canada, Mexico, and the United States of America included in the North American Atlas data sets is strictly to complete the context of the data. The North American Atlas - Bathymetry data set shows the depth in metres for ocean areas covered by the extent of the North American Atlas project. Isobaths (lines of equal depth) are provided for sea level (coastline, with depth = 1), 200, 500, and 2500 metres. Polygons bounded by these isobaths represent depth ranges of 0-200, 200-500, 500-2500, and greater than 2500 metres.

The datasets contain the computer code and data required to determine the cost and economic impacts of phosphorus recovery from municipal wastewater in Canada and the United States. The datasets supply data to (i) calculate the efficiency and cost of phosphorus recovery from the aqueous phase of digestate and sewage sludge for wastewater resource recovery facilities (WRRFs) as shown in Figure 1; (ii) estimate the average annual per capita phosphorus recovery cost and the household affordability index (HAI) across the second-level territory divisions (census divisions (Canada) and counties (United States)) when excluding and including the offset cost derived from avoiding potential environmental damage caused by phosphorus releases as shown in Figure 2; (iii) supply the distribution of population in urban and rural areas, the treatment level of the WRRFs, and the phosphorus recovery points as a function of the WRRF scale in the studied regions of Canada and the United States as shown in Figure 3; and (iv) describe the distribution of the average phosphorus recovery cost, annual per capita phosphorus recovery costs, and the HAI per studied regions as shown in Figure 4. Data describing the WRRFs’ location and characteristics across the studied regions of Canada and the United States are retrieved from the HydroWASTE database (https://www.hydrosheds.org/products/hydrowaste), including their spatial coordinates, treatment level, treatment design capacity, and population served. The HydroWASTE database reports the WRRF treatment level as primary, secondary, and advanced treatment. Since the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency does not define numeric nutrient water quality criteria for secondary wastewater treatment effluents, we consider that only the WRRFs with advanced treatments have specific processes for removing phosphorus from the liquid effluent. To perform the analysis at the second-level divisions, data on total population, distribution of population in urban and rural areas, total income, and average annual income per capita are retrieved at the census division and county level for Canada and the United States, respectively. Data for the year 2020 is considered since it is the most recent information available for both countries. The first-level divisions level corresponds to census divisions of the United States, which provide territorial divisions similar in terms of development, demographic characteristics, and economic activities, being extensively used for collecting and analyzing data throughout the United States. A table of the states included in each United States census division can be found in the Supplementary Information file. The equivalent of the United States census divisions for Canada is the Canadian provinces and territories, although it must be noted that, unlike the case of the United States, their definition is guided by administrative and political considerations instead of statistical criteria.

Indexes of real expenditure per capita in the United States relative to those in Canada for categories of gross domestic income (GDI), Canada=100, on an International Comparison Project Classification (ICP) basis.

About this dataset

Context

The dataset presents the the household distribution across 16 income brackets among four distinct age groups in Little Canada: Under 25 years, 25-44 years, 45-64 years, and over 65 years. The dataset highlights the variation in household income, offering valuable insights into economic trends and disparities within different age categories, aiding in data analysis and decision-making..

Key observations

• Upon closer examination of the distribution of households among age brackets, it reveals that there are 89(1.84%) households where the householder is under 25 years old, 1,455(30.01%) households with a householder aged between 25 and 44 years, 2,138(44.09%) households with a householder aged between 45 and 64 years, and 1,167(24.07%) households where the householder is over 65 years old.
• The age group of 25 to 44 years exhibits the highest median household income, while the largest number of households falls within the 45 to 64 years bracket. This distribution hints at economic disparities within the city of Little Canada, showcasing varying income levels among different age demographics.

Content

When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2017-2021 5-Year Estimates.

Income brackets:

• Less than $10,000
• $10,000 to $14,999
• $15,000 to $19,999
• $20,000 to $24,999
• $25,000 to $29,999
• $30,000 to $34,999
• $35,000 to $39,999
• $40,000 to $44,999
• $45,000 to $49,999
• $50,000 to $59,999
• $60,000 to $74,999
• $75,000 to $99,999
• $100,000 to $124,999
• $125,000 to $149,999
• $150,000 to $199,999
• $200,000 or more

Variables / Data Columns

• Household Income: This column showcases 16 income brackets ranging from Under $10,000 to $200,000+ ( As mentioned above).
• Under 25 years: The count of households led by a head of household under 25 years old with income within a specified income bracket.
• 25 to 44 years: The count of households led by a head of household 25 to 44 years old with income within a specified income bracket.
• 45 to 64 years: The count of households led by a head of household 45 to 64 years old with income within a specified income bracket.
• 65 years and over: The count of households led by a head of household 65 years and over old with income within a specified income bracket.

Good to know

Margin of Error

Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.

Custom data

If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.

Inspiration

Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.

Recommended for further research

This dataset is a part of the main dataset for Little Canada median household income by age. You can refer the same here

The USD/CAD exchange rate rose to 1.3700 on June 9, 2025, up 0.03% from the previous session. Over the past month, the Canadian Dollar has strengthened 1.96%, and is up by 0.44% over the last 12 months. Canadian Dollar - values, historical data, forecasts and news - updated on June of 2025.

The North American Rail Network (NARN) Rail Lines: CN View dataset is from the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) and is part of the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT)/Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS) National Transportation Atlas Database (NTAD). This dataset is a subset of the NARN Rail Lines dataset that show the ownership and trackage rights for the Class I railroad “Canadian National (CN) Railway.†It is derived from the North American Rail Network (NARN) Lines dataset, and for more information please consult, https://doi.org/10.21949/1519415. The NARN Rail Lines dataset is a database that provides ownership, trackage rights, type, passenger, STRACNET, and geographic reference for North America's railway system at 1:24,000 or better within the United States. The data set covers all 50 States, the District of Columbia, Mexico, and Canada. A data dictionary, or other source of attribute information, is accessible at https://doi.org/10.21949/1528950

Access B2B Contact Data for North American Small Business Owners with Success.ai—your go-to provider for verified, high-quality business datasets. This dataset is tailored for businesses, agencies, and professionals seeking direct access to decision-makers within the small business ecosystem across North America. With over 170 million professional profiles, it’s an unparalleled resource for powering your marketing, sales, and lead generation efforts.

Key Features of the Dataset:

Verified Contact Details

Includes accurate and up-to-date email addresses and phone numbers to ensure you reach your targets reliably.

AI-validated for 99% accuracy, eliminating errors and reducing wasted efforts.

Detailed Professional Insights

Comprehensive data points include job titles, skills, work experience, and education to enable precise segmentation and targeting.

Enriched with insights into decision-making roles, helping you connect directly with small business owners, CEOs, and other key stakeholders.

Business-Specific Information

Covers essential details such as industry, company size, location, and more, enabling you to tailor your campaigns effectively. Ideal for profiling and understanding the unique needs of small businesses.

Continuously Updated Data

Our dataset is maintained and updated regularly to ensure relevance and accuracy in fast-changing market conditions. New business contacts are added frequently, helping you stay ahead of the competition.

Why Choose Success.ai?

At Success.ai, we understand the critical importance of high-quality data for your business success. Here’s why our dataset stands out:

Tailored for Small Business Engagement Focused specifically on North American small business owners, this dataset is an invaluable resource for building relationships with SMEs (Small and Medium Enterprises). Whether you’re targeting startups, local businesses, or established small enterprises, our dataset has you covered.

Comprehensive Coverage Across North America Spanning the United States, Canada, and Mexico, our dataset ensures wide-reaching access to verified small business contacts in the region.

Categories Tailored to Your Needs Includes highly relevant categories such as Small Business Contact Data, CEO Contact Data, B2B Contact Data, and Email Address Data to match your marketing and sales strategies.

Customizable and Flexible Choose from a wide range of filtering options to create datasets that meet your exact specifications, including filtering by industry, company size, geographic location, and more.

Best Price Guaranteed We pride ourselves on offering the most competitive rates without compromising on quality. When you partner with Success.ai, you receive superior data at the best value.

Seamless Integration Delivered in formats that integrate effortlessly with your CRM, marketing automation, or sales platforms, so you can start acting on the data immediately.

Use Cases: This dataset empowers you to:

Drive Sales Growth: Build and refine your sales pipeline by connecting directly with decision-makers in small businesses. Optimize Marketing Campaigns: Launch highly targeted email and phone outreach campaigns with verified contact data. Expand Your Network: Leverage the dataset to build relationships with small business owners and other key figures within the B2B landscape. Improve Data Accuracy: Enhance your existing databases with verified, enriched contact information, reducing bounce rates and increasing ROI. Industries Served: Whether you're in B2B SaaS, digital marketing, consulting, or any field requiring accurate and targeted contact data, this dataset serves industries of all kinds. It is especially useful for professionals focused on:

Lead Generation Business Development Market Research Sales Outreach Customer Acquisition What’s Included in the Dataset: Each profile provides:

Full Name Verified Email Address Phone Number (where available) Job Title Company Name Industry Company Size Location Skills and Professional Experience Education Background With over 170 million profiles, you can tap into a wealth of opportunities to expand your reach and grow your business.

Why High-Quality Contact Data Matters: Accurate, verified contact data is the foundation of any successful B2B strategy. Reaching small business owners and decision-makers directly ensures your message lands where it matters most, reducing costs and improving the effectiveness of your campaigns. By choosing Success.ai, you ensure that every contact in your pipeline is a genuine opportunity.

Partner with Success.ai for Better Data, Better Results: Success.ai is committed to delivering premium-quality B2B data solutions at scale. With our small business owner dataset, you can unlock the potential of North America's dynamic small business market.

Get Started Today Request a sample or customize your dataset to fit your unique...

Every two years the WECC (Western Electricity Coordinating Council) releases an Anchor Data Set (ADS) to be analyzed with a Production Cost Models (PCM) and which represents the expected loads, resources, and transmission topology 10 years in the future from a given reference year. For hydropower resources, the WECC relies on members to provide data to parameterize the hydropower representation in production cost models. The datasets consist of plant-level hydropower generation, flexibility, ramping, and mode of operations and are tied to the hydropower representation in those production cost models.

In 2022, PNNL supported the WECC by developing the WECC ADS 2032 hydropower dataset [1]. The WECC ADS 2032 hydropower dataset (generation and flexibility) included an update of the climate year conditions (2018 calendar year), consistency in representation across the entire US WECC footprint, updated hydropower operations over the core Columbia River, and a higher temporal resolution (weekly instead of monthly)[1] associated with a GridView software update (weekly hydro logic). Proprietary WECC utility hydropower data were used when available to develop the monthly and weekly datasets and were completed with HydroWIRES B1 methods to develop the Hydro 923 plus (now RectifHydPlus weekly hydropower dataset) [2] and the flexibility parameterization [3]. The team worked with Bonneville Power Administration to develop hydropower datasets over the core Columbia River representative of the post-2018 change in environmental regulation (flex spill). Ramping data are considered proprietary, were leveraged from WECC ADS 2030, and were not provided in the release, nor are the WECC-member hydropower data.

This release represents the WECC ADS 2034 hydropower dataset. The generator database was first updated by WECC. Based on a review of hourly generation profiles, 16 facilities were transitioned from fixed schedule to dispatchable (380.5MW). The operations of the core Columbia River were updated based on Bonneville Power Administration's long-term hydro-modeling using 2020-level of modified flows and using fiscal year 2031 expected operations. The update was necessary to reflect the new environmental regulation (EIS2023). The team also included a newly developed extension over Canada [4] that improves upon existing data and synchronizes the US and Canadian data to the same 2018 weather year. Canadian facilities over the Peace River were not updated due to a lack of available flow data. The team was able to modernize and improve the overall data processing using modern tools as well as provide thorough documentation and reproducible workflows [5,6]. The datasets have been incorporated into the 2034 ADS and are in active use by WECC and the community.

WECC ADS 2034 hydropower datasets contain generation at weekly and monthly timesteps, for US hydropower plants, monthly generation for Canadian hydropower plants, and the two merged together. Separate datasets are included for generation by hydropower plant and generation by individual generator units. Only processed data are provided. Original WECC-utility hourly data are under a non-disclosure agreement and for the sole use of developing this dataset.

[1] Voisin, N., Harris, K. M., Oikonomou, K., Turner, S., Johnson, A., Wallace, S., Racht, P., et al. (2022). WECC ADS 2032 Hydropower Dataset (PNNL-SA-172734). See presentation (Voisin N., K.M. Harris, K. Oikonomou, and S. Turner. 04/05/2022. "WECC 2032 Anchor Dataset - Hydropower." Presented by N. Voisin, K. Oikonomou at WECC Production Cost Model Dataset Subcommittee Meeting, Online, Utah. PNNL-SA-171897.).

[2] Turner, S. W. D., Voisin, N., Oikonomou, K., & Bracken, C. (2023). Hydro 923: Monthly and Weekly Hydropower Constraints Based on Disaggregated EIA-923 Data (v1.1.0) [Data set]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8212727

[3] Stark, G., Barrows, C., Dalvi, S., Guo, N., Michelettey, P., Trina, E., Watson, A., Voisin, N., Turner, S., Oikonomou, K. and Colotelo, A. 2023 Improving the Representation of Hydropower in Production Cost Models, NREL/TP-5700-86377, United States. https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1993943

[4] Son, Y., Bracken, C., Broman, D., & Voisin, N. (2025). Monthly Hydropower Generation Dataset for Western Canada (1.1.0) [Data set]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14984725

[5] https://github.com/HydroWIRES-PNNL/weccadshydro/

Dataset Files:

Data Description:

Each dataset contains the following column headers:

Data Source (Method)

The dataset contains data from four different data sources, developed using different methods:

Techsalerator’s Import/Export Trade Data for North America

Techsalerator’s Import/Export Trade Data for North America delivers an exhaustive and nuanced analysis of trade activities across the North American continent. This extensive dataset provides detailed insights into import and export transactions involving companies across various sectors within North America.

Coverage Across All North American Countries

The dataset encompasses all key countries within North America, including:

1. United States

The dataset provides detailed trade information for the United States, the largest economy in the region. It includes extensive data on trade volumes, product categories, and the key trading partners of the U.S. 2. Canada

Data for Canada covers a wide range of trade activities, including import and export transactions, product classifications, and trade relationships with major global and regional partners. 3. Mexico

Comprehensive data for Mexico includes detailed records on its trade activities, including exports and imports, key sectors, and trade agreements affecting its trade dynamics. 4. Central American Countries:

Belize Costa Rica El Salvador Guatemala Honduras Nicaragua Panama The dataset covers these countries with information on their trade flows, key products, and trade relations with North American and international partners. 5. Caribbean Countries:

Bahamas Barbados Cuba Dominica Dominican Republic Grenada Haiti Jamaica Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Trinidad and Tobago Trade data for these Caribbean nations includes detailed transaction records, sector-specific trade information, and their interactions with North American trade partners. Comprehensive Data Features

Transaction Details: The dataset includes precise details on each trade transaction, such as product descriptions, quantities, values, and dates. This allows for an accurate understanding of trade flows and patterns across North America.

Company Information: It provides data on companies involved in trade, including names, locations, and industry sectors, enabling targeted business analysis and competitive intelligence.

Categorization: Transactions are categorized by industry sectors, product types, and trade partners, offering insights into market dynamics and sector-specific trends within North America.

Trade Trends: Historical data helps users analyze trends over time, identify emerging markets, and assess the impact of economic or political events on trade flows in the region.

Geographical Insights: The data offers insights into regional trade flows and cross-border dynamics between North American countries and their global trade partners, including significant international trade relationships.

Regulatory and Compliance Data: Information on trade regulations, tariffs, and compliance requirements is included, helping businesses navigate the complex regulatory environments within North America.

Applications and Benefits

Market Research: Companies can leverage the data to discover new market opportunities, analyze competitive landscapes, and understand demand for specific products across North American countries.

Strategic Planning: Insights from the data enable companies to refine trade strategies, optimize supply chains, and manage risks associated with international trade in North America.

Economic Analysis: Analysts and policymakers can monitor economic performance, evaluate trade balances, and make informed decisions on trade policies and economic development strategies.

Investment Decisions: Investors can assess trade trends and market potentials to make informed decisions about investments in North America's diverse economies.

Techsalerator’s Import/Export Trade Data for North America offers a vital resource for organizations involved in international trade, providing a thorough, reliable, and detailed view of trade activities across the continent.

Techsalerator’s News Event Data in North America offers a comprehensive and detailed dataset designed to provide businesses, analysts, journalists, and researchers with a thorough view of significant news events across North America. This dataset captures and categorizes major events reported from a diverse range of news sources, including press releases, industry news sites, blogs, and PR platforms, providing valuable insights into regional developments, economic shifts, political changes, and cultural events.

Key Features of the Dataset: Extensive Coverage:

The dataset aggregates news events from a wide array of sources, including company press releases, industry-specific news outlets, blogs, PR sites, and traditional media. This broad coverage ensures a diverse range of information from multiple reporting channels. Categorization of Events:

News events are categorized into various types such as business and economic updates, political developments, technological advancements, legal and regulatory changes, and cultural events. This categorization helps users quickly find and analyze information relevant to their interests or sectors. Real-Time Updates:

The dataset is updated regularly to include the most current events, ensuring that users have access to up-to-date news and can stay informed about recent developments as they happen. Geographic Segmentation:

Events are tagged with their respective countries and territories within North America. This geographic segmentation allows users to filter and analyze news events based on specific locations, facilitating targeted research and analysis. Event Details:

Each event entry includes comprehensive details such as the date of occurrence, source of the news, a description of the event, and relevant keywords. This thorough detailing helps users understand the context and significance of each event. Historical Data:

The dataset includes historical news event data, enabling users to track trends and conduct comparative analysis over time. This feature supports longitudinal studies and provides insights into how news events evolve. Advanced Search and Filter Options:

Users can search and filter news events based on criteria such as date range, event type, location, and keywords. This functionality allows for precise and efficient retrieval of relevant information. North American Countries and Territories Covered: Countries: Canada Mexico United States Territories: American Samoa (U.S. territory) French Polynesia (French overseas collectivity; included for regional relevance) Guam (U.S. territory) New Caledonia (French special collectivity; included for regional relevance) Northern Mariana Islands (U.S. territory) Puerto Rico (U.S. territory) Saint Pierre and Miquelon (French overseas territory; geographically close to North America and included for regional comprehensiveness) Wallis and Futuna (French overseas collectivity; included for regional relevance) Benefits of the Dataset: Strategic Insights: Businesses and analysts can use the dataset to gain insights into significant regional developments, economic conditions, and political changes, aiding in strategic decision-making and market analysis. Market and Industry Trends: The dataset provides valuable information on industry-specific trends and events, helping users understand market dynamics and identify emerging opportunities. Media and PR Monitoring: Journalists and PR professionals can track relevant news across North America, enabling them to monitor media coverage, identify emerging stories, and manage public relations efforts effectively. Academic and Research Use: Researchers can utilize the dataset for longitudinal studies, trend analysis, and academic research on various topics related to North American news and events. Techsalerator’s News Event Data in North America is a crucial resource for accessing and analyzing significant news events across the continent. By providing detailed, categorized, and up-to-date information, it supports effective decision-making, research, and media monitoring across diverse sectors.

These datasets explore disparities in COVID-19 mortality observed in the US and Canada between January 2020 and early March 2021. Table 1 provides counts of deaths, hospitalizations, ICU admissions, and cases, by age, for Ontario, Canada (Canada's most populous province).

Table 2 estimates deaths averted by Canada's response to the COVID-19 pandemic, relative to that in the United States, by "Canada-standardizing" the US epidemic (i.e., by applying US age-specific mortality to Canadian populations, in order to estimate the deaths that would have occurred in a Canadian pandemic with the same rates of death as have been observed in the US). Observed Canadian deaths are compared to "expected" deaths with a US-like response in order to estimate both deaths averted and SMR (Table 2).

As Canadian age groups for purposes of death reporting are slightly different from those used in the US (e.g., 0-17 in the US vs. 0-19 in Canada), we reallocate Canadian deaths based on proportions of deaths occurring in 2-year age categories in Ontario (Table 1).

Ontario age-specific case-fatality is used to inflate the deaths averted, in order to estimate cases averted. Ontario age-specific hospitalization and ICU risk (again derived from Table 1) are used to estimate hospitalizations and ICU admissions averted (Table 2).

As of August 9, 2022, a new dataset has been added which applies the methodology described above to compare deaths in Canada to those in the United Kingdom, France, and Australia. Estimates of QALY loss, and healthcare costs averted, have also been added. Uncertainty bounds are estimated either as parametric confidence intervals, or as upper and lower bound 95% credible intervals through simulation (implemented using the random draw funding in Microsoft Excel).

Errors in confidence intervals for QALY losses in France and Australia corrected February 28, 2023.

This dataset extends NAMEXACT by including words that can be used as names, but may not exclusively be used as names in every context.

Dataset Details Dataset Description

Unlike NAMEXACT, this datasets contains words that are mostly used as names, but may also be used in other contexts, such as

Christian (believer in Christianity) Drew (simple past of the verb to draw) Florence (an Italian city) Henry (the SI unit of inductance) Mercedes (a car brand)

In addition, names with ambiguous gender are included - once for each gender. For instance, Skyler is included as female (F) name with a probability of 37.3%, and as male (M) name with a probability of 62.7%.

Dataset Sources [optional]

Repository: github.com/aieng-lab/gradiend

Original Dataset: Gender by Name

Dataset Structure

name: the name gender: the gender of the name (M for male and F for female) count: the count value of this name (raw value from the original dataset) probability: the probability of this name (raw value from original dataset; not normalized to this dataset!) gender_agreement: a value describing the certainty that this name has an unambiguous gender computed as the maximum probability of that name across both genders, e.g., $max(37.7%, 62.7%)=62.7%$ for Skyler. For names with a unique gender in this dataset, this value is 1.0 primary_gender: is equal to gender for names with a unique gender in this dataset, and equals otherwise the gender of that name with higher probability genders: label B if both genders are contained for this name in this dataset, otherwise equal to gender prob_F: the probability of that name being used as a female name (i.e., 0.0 or 1.0 if genders != B) prob_M: the probability of that name being used as a male name

Dataset Creation Source Data

The data is created by filtering Gender by Name.

Data Collection and Processing

The original data is filtered to contain only names with a count of at least 100 to remove very rare names. This threshold reduces the total number of names by $72%, from 133910 to 37425.

Bias, Risks, and Limitations

The original dataset provides counts of names (with their gender) for male and female babies from open-source government authorities in the US (1880-2019), UK (2011-2018), Canada (2011-2018), and Australia (1944-2019) in these periods