Facebook
TwitterIn 2022, San Francisco had the highest median household income of cities ranking within the top 25 in terms of population, with a median household income in of 136,692 U.S. dollars. In that year, San Jose in California was ranked second, and Seattle, Washington third.
Following a fall after the great recession, median household income in the United States has been increasing in recent years. As of 2022, median household income by state was highest in Maryland, Washington, D.C., Utah, and Massachusetts. It was lowest in Mississippi, West Virginia, and Arkansas. Families with an annual income of 25,000 and 49,999 U.S. dollars made up the largest income bracket in America, with about 25.26 million households.
Data on median household income can be compared to statistics on personal income in the U.S. released by the Bureau of Economic Analysis. Personal income rose to around 21.8 trillion U.S. dollars in 2022, the highest value recorded. Personal income is a measure of the total income received by persons from all sources, while median household income is “the amount with divides the income distribution into two equal groups,” according to the U.S. Census Bureau. Half of the population in question lives above median income and half lives below. Though total personal income has increased in recent years, this wealth is not distributed throughout the population. In practical terms, income of most households has decreased. One additional statistic illustrates this disparity: for the lowest quintile of workers, mean household income has remained more or less steady for the past decade at about 13 to 16 thousand constant U.S. dollars annually. Meanwhile, income for the top five percent of workers has actually risen from about 285,000 U.S. dollars in 1990 to about 499,900 U.S. dollars in 2020.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
Analyze the marketing spending.
1- Overall ROMI 2- ROMI by campaigns 3- Performance of the campaign depending on the date - on which date did we spend the most money on advertising, when we got the biggest revenue when conversion rates were high and low? What were the average order values? 4- When buyers are more active? What is the average revenue on weekdays and weekends? 5- Which types of campaigns work best - social, banner, influencer, or a search? 6- Which geo locations are better for targeting - tier 1 or tier 2 cities?
Column. Description Date date of spending of the marketing budget Campaign name description of campaign Category type of marketing source Campaign id unique identifier Impressions number of times the ad has been shown Mark. budget money spent on this campaign on this day Clicks how many people clicked on a banner (=visited website) Leads how many people signed up and left their credentials Orders how many people paid for the product Revenue how much money we earned
Clicks, Leads, orders, and revenue are calculated for a specific marketing campaign on a specific date. E.g. For the “facebook_tier1” marketing campaign on the 1st of February, we spent INR 7,307.37, got 148,263 impressions that converted to 1,210 clicks that in turn converted to 13 leads and 1 order. We earned INR 4,981.
This data reflects some facts about what happened - how much we spent, how much we earned, how customers behaved (who clicked on the ad banner, who signed up, who paid). Now we need to calculate marketing metrics that would help us evaluate if we did a good job or not and also identify some parameters of the campaign that would be important for analysis. What are these metrics:
These metrics are actionable and allow us not only to analyze but to make decisions and act to improve the business result.
Let’s dive deeper.
ROMI return on marketing investments, how effective is marketing
campaign, one metric that shows effectiveness of every rupee spent.
It is calculated ( Total earning (Revenue) - Marketing cost ) / Marketing cost )
Click-through rate(CTR). percentage of people who clicked at banner (Clicks/ Impressions)
Conversion 1 conversion from visitors to leads for this campaign (Leads/Click)
Conversion 2 conversion rate from leads to sales (Orders/Leads)
Average order value (AOV) Average order value for this campaign (Revenue/Number of Orders)
Cost per click (CPC) how much does it cost us to attract 1 click (on average) (Marketing spending/Clicks)
Cost per lead (CPL) how much does it cost us to attract 1 lead (on average) (Marketing spending/Leads)
Customer acquisition cost (CAC) -- how much does it cost us to attract 1 order (on average) (marketing spend/ orders) Gross profit Profit or loss after deducting marketing cost (Revenue-Marketing spending)
ROMI is the most important metric and it is used as the ultimate way to evaluate if the campaign is good or bad.
You can use this article to know more about marketing metrics. https://www.owox.com/blog/articles/digital-marketing-metrics-and-kpis/
Facebook
TwitterThe Survey of Consumer Finances (SCF) is normally a triennial cross-sectional survey of U.S. families. The survey data include information on families' balance sheets, pensions, income, and demographic characteristics.
Facebook
TwitterThe gender pay gap or gender wage gap is the average difference between the remuneration for men and women who are working. Women are generally considered to be paid less than men. There are two distinct numbers regarding the pay gap: non-adjusted versus adjusted pay gap. The latter typically takes into account differences in hours worked, occupations were chosen, education, and job experience. In the United States, for example, the non-adjusted average female's annual salary is 79% of the average male salary, compared to 95% for the adjusted average salary.
The reasons link to legal, social, and economic factors, and extend beyond "equal pay for equal work".
The gender pay gap can be a problem from a public policy perspective because it reduces economic output and means that women are more likely to be dependent upon welfare payments, especially in old age.
This dataset aims to replicate the data used in the famous paper "The Gender Wage Gap: Extent, Trends, and Explanations", which provides new empirical evidence on the extent of and trends in the gender wage gap, which declined considerably during the 1980–2010 period.
fedesoriano. (January 2022). Gender Pay Gap Dataset. Retrieved [Date Retrieved] from https://www.kaggle.com/fedesoriano/gender-pay-gap-dataset.
There are 2 files in this dataset: a) the Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID) microdata over the 1980-2010 period, and b) the Current Population Survey (CPS) to provide some additional US national data on the gender pay gap.
PSID variables:
NOTES: THE VARIABLES WITH fz ADDED TO THEIR NAME REFER TO EXPERIENCE WHERE WE HAVE FILLED IN SOME ZEROS IN THE MISSING PSID YEARS WITH DATA FROM THE RESPONDENTS’ ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS ABOUT JOBS WORKED ON DURING THESE MISSING YEARS. THE fz variables WERE USED IN THE REGRESSION ANALYSES THE VARIABLES WITH A predict PREFIX REFER TO THE COMPUTATION OF ACTUAL EXPERIENCE ACCUMULATED DURING THE YEARS IN WHICH THE PSID DID NOT SURVEY THE RESPONDENTS. THERE ARE MORE PREDICTED EXPERIENCE LEVELS THAT ARE NEEDED TO IMPUTE EXPERIENCE IN THE MISSING YEARS IN SOME CASES. NOTE THAT THE VARIABLES yrsexpf, yrsexpfsz, etc., INCLUDE THESE COMPUTATIONS, SO THAT IF YOU WANT TO USE FULL TIME OR PART TIME EXPERIENCE, YOU DON’T NEED TO ADD THESE PREDICT VARIABLES IN. THEY ARE INCLUDED IN THE DATA SET TO ILLUSTRATE THE RESULTS OF THE COMPUTATION PROCESS. THE VARIABLES WITH AN orig PREFIX ARE THE ORIGINAL PSID VARIABLES. THESE HAVE BEEN PROCESSED AND IN SOME CASES RENAMED FOR CONVENIENCE. THE hd SUFFIX MEANS THAT THE VARIABLE REFERS TO THE HEAD OF THE FAMILY, AND THE wf SUFFIX MEANS THAT IT REFERS TO THE WIFE OR FEMALE COHABITOR IF THERE IS ONE. AS SHOWN IN THE ACCOMPANYING REGRESSION PROGRAM, THESE orig VARIABLES AREN’T USED DIRECTLY IN THE REGRESSIONS. THERE ARE MORE OF THE ORIGINAL PSID VARIABLES, WHICH WERE USED TO CONSTRUCT THE VARIABLES USED IN THE REGRESSIONS. HD MEANS HEAD AND WF MEANS WIFE OR FEMALE COHABITOR.
Facebook
Twitterhttps://www.incomebyzipcode.com/terms#TERMShttps://www.incomebyzipcode.com/terms#TERMS
A dataset listing the richest zip codes in Virginia per the most current US Census data, including information on rank and average income.
Facebook
TwitterLending Club offers peer-to-peer (P2P) loans through a technological platform for various personal finance purposes and is today one of the companies that dominate the US P2P lending market. The original dataset is publicly available on Kaggle and corresponds to all the loans issued by Lending Club between 2007 and 2018. The present version of the dataset is for constructing a granting model, that is, a model designed to make decisions on whether to grant a loan based on information available at the time of the loan application. Consequently, our dataset only has a selection of variables from the original one, which are the variables known at the moment the loan request is made. Furthermore, the target variable of a granting model represents the final status of the loan, that are "default" or "fully paid". Thus, we filtered out from the original dataset all the loans in transitory states. Our dataset comprises 1,347,681 records or obligations (approximately 60% of the original) and it was also cleaned for completeness and consistency (less than 1% of our dataset was filtered out).
TARGET VARIABLE
The dataset includes a target variable based on the final resolution of the credit: the default category corresponds to the event charged off and the non-default category to the event fully paid. It does not consider other values in the loan status variable since this variable represents the state of the loan at the end of the considered time window. Thus, there are no loans in transitory states. The original dataset includes the target variable “loan status”, which contains several categories ('Fully Paid', 'Current', 'Charged Off', 'In Grace Period', 'Late (31-120 days)', 'Late (16-30 days)', 'Default'). However, in our dataset, we just consider loans that are either “Fully Paid” or “Default” and transform this variable into a binary variable called “Default”, with a 0 for fully paid loans and a 1 for defaulted loans.
EXPLANATORY VARIABLES
The explanatory variables that we use correspond only to the information available at the time of the application. Variables such as the interest rate, grade, or subgrade are generated by the company as a result of a credit risk assessment process, so they were filtered out from the dataset as they must not be considered in risk models to predict the default in granting of credit.
FULL LIST OF VARIABLES
Loan identification variables:
id: Loan id (unique identifier).
issue_d: Month and year in which the loan was approved.
Quantitative variables:
revenue: Borrower's self-declared annual income during registration.
dti_n: Indebtedness ratio for obligations excluding mortgage. Monthly information. This ratio has been calculated considering the indebtedness of the whole group of applicants. It is estimated as the ratio calculated using the co-borrowers’ total payments on the total debt obligations divided by the co-borrowers’ combined monthly income.
loan_amnt: Amount of credit requested by the borrower.
fico_n: Defined between 300 and 850, reported by Fair Isaac Corporation as a risk measure based on historical credit information reported at the time of application. This value has been calculated as the average of the variables “fico_range_low” and “fico_range_high” in the original dataset.
experience_c: Binary variable that indicates whether the borrower is new to the entity. This variable is constructed from the credit date of the previous obligation in LC and the credit date of the current obligation; if the difference between dates is positive, it is not considered as a new experience with LC.
Categorical variables:
emp_length: Categorical variable with the employment length of the borrower (includes the no information category)
purpose: Credit purpose category for the loan request.
home_ownership_n: Homeownership status provided by the borrower in the registration process. Categories defined by LC: “mortgage”, “rent”, “own”, “other”, “any”, “none”. We merged the categories “other”, “any” and “none” as “other”.
addr_state: Borrower's residence state from the USA.
zip_code: Zip code of the borrower's residence.
Textual variables
title: Title of the credit request description provided by the borrower.
desc: Description of the credit request provided by the borrower.
We cleaned the textual variables. First, we removed all those descriptions that contained the default description provided by Lending Club on its web form (“Tell your story. What is your loan for?”). Moreover, we removed the prefix “Borrower added on DD/MM/YYYY >” from the descriptions to avoid any temporal background on them. Finally, as these descriptions came from a web form, we substituted all the HTML elements by their character (e.g. “&” was substituted by “&”, “<” was substituted by “<”, etc.).
RELATED WORKS
This dataset has been used in the following academic articles:
Sanz-Guerrero, M. Arroyo, J. (2024). Credit Risk Meets Large Language Models: Building a Risk Indicator from Loan Descriptions in P2P Lending. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.16458. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2401.16458
Ariza-Garzón, M.J., Arroyo, J., Caparrini, A., Segovia-Vargas, M.J. (2020). Explainability of a machine learning granting scoring model in peer-to-peer lending. IEEE Access 8, 64873 - 64890. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2984412
Facebook
Twitterhttps://www.incomebyzipcode.com/terms#TERMShttps://www.incomebyzipcode.com/terms#TERMS
A dataset listing the richest zip codes in Puerto Rico per the most current US Census data, including information on rank and average income.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Context
The dataset presents median income data over a decade or more for males and females categorized by Total, Full-Time Year-Round (FT), and Part-Time (PT) employment in Upper Bern township. It showcases annual income, providing insights into gender-specific income distributions and the disparities between full-time and part-time work. The dataset can be utilized to gain insights into gender-based pay disparity trends and explore the variations in income for male and female individuals.
Key observations: Insights from 2021
Based on our analysis ACS 2017-2021 5-Year Estimates, we present the following observations: - All workers, aged 15 years and older: In Upper Bern township, the median income for all workers aged 15 years and older, regardless of work hours, was $53,201 for males and $29,367 for females.
These income figures highlight a substantial gender-based income gap in Upper Bern township. Women, regardless of work hours, earn 55 cents for each dollar earned by men. This significant gender pay gap, approximately 45%, underscores concerning gender-based income inequality in the township of Upper Bern township.
- Full-time workers, aged 15 years and older: In Upper Bern township, among full-time, year-round workers aged 15 years and older, males earned a median income of $60,531, while females earned $60,080, resulting in a 1% gender pay gap among full-time workers. This illustrates that women earn 99 cents for each dollar earned by men in full-time positions. While this gap shows a trend where women are inching closer to wage parity with men, it also exhibits a noticeable income difference for women working full-time in the township of Upper Bern township.Interestingly, when analyzing income across all roles, including non-full-time employment, the gender pay gap percentage was higher for women compared to men. It appears that full-time employment presents a more favorable income scenario for women compared to other employment patterns in Upper Bern township.
https://i.neilsberg.com/ch/upper-bern-township-pa-income-by-gender.jpeg" alt="Upper Bern Township, Pennsylvania gender based income disparity">
When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2017-2021 5-Year Estimates. All incomes have been adjusting for inflation and are presented in 2022-inflation-adjusted dollars.
Gender classifications include:
Employment type classifications include:
Variables / Data Columns
Good to know
Margin of Error
Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.
Custom data
If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.
Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.
This dataset is a part of the main dataset for Upper Bern township median household income by gender. You can refer the same here
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Context
The dataset presents median income data over a decade or more for males and females categorized by Total, Full-Time Year-Round (FT), and Part-Time (PT) employment in Upper Hanover township. It showcases annual income, providing insights into gender-specific income distributions and the disparities between full-time and part-time work. The dataset can be utilized to gain insights into gender-based pay disparity trends and explore the variations in income for male and female individuals.
Key observations: Insights from 2021
Based on our analysis ACS 2017-2021 5-Year Estimates, we present the following observations: - All workers, aged 15 years and older: In Upper Hanover township, the median income for all workers aged 15 years and older, regardless of work hours, was $60,597 for males and $39,430 for females.
These income figures highlight a substantial gender-based income gap in Upper Hanover township. Women, regardless of work hours, earn 65 cents for each dollar earned by men. This significant gender pay gap, approximately 35%, underscores concerning gender-based income inequality in the township of Upper Hanover township.
- Full-time workers, aged 15 years and older: In Upper Hanover township, among full-time, year-round workers aged 15 years and older, males earned a median income of $72,937, while females earned $72,361, resulting in a 1% gender pay gap among full-time workers. This illustrates that women earn 99 cents for each dollar earned by men in full-time positions. While this gap shows a trend where women are inching closer to wage parity with men, it also exhibits a noticeable income difference for women working full-time in the township of Upper Hanover township.Interestingly, when analyzing income across all roles, including non-full-time employment, the gender pay gap percentage was higher for women compared to men. It appears that full-time employment presents a more favorable income scenario for women compared to other employment patterns in Upper Hanover township.
https://i.neilsberg.com/ch/upper-hanover-township-pa-income-by-gender.jpeg" alt="Upper Hanover Township, Pennsylvania gender based income disparity">
When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2017-2021 5-Year Estimates. All incomes have been adjusting for inflation and are presented in 2022-inflation-adjusted dollars.
Gender classifications include:
Employment type classifications include:
Variables / Data Columns
Good to know
Margin of Error
Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.
Custom data
If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.
Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.
This dataset is a part of the main dataset for Upper Hanover township median household income by gender. You can refer the same here
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Context
The dataset presents median income data over a decade or more for males and females categorized by Total, Full-Time Year-Round (FT), and Part-Time (PT) employment in Liberty Center. It showcases annual income, providing insights into gender-specific income distributions and the disparities between full-time and part-time work. The dataset can be utilized to gain insights into gender-based pay disparity trends and explore the variations in income for male and female individuals.
Key observations: Insights from 2021
Based on our analysis ACS 2017-2021 5-Year Estimates, we present the following observations: - All workers, aged 15 years and older: In Liberty Center, the median income for all workers aged 15 years and older, regardless of work hours, was $32,182 for males and $31,887 for females.
Based on these incomes, we observe a gender gap percentage of approximately 1%, indicating a significant disparity between the median incomes of males and females in Liberty Center. Women, regardless of work hours, still earn 99 cents to each dollar earned by men, highlighting an ongoing gender-based wage gap.
- Full-time workers, aged 15 years and older: In Liberty Center, among full-time, year-round workers aged 15 years and older, males earned a median income of $57,897, while females earned $44,756, leading to a 23% gender pay gap among full-time workers. This illustrates that women earn 77 cents for each dollar earned by men in full-time roles. This analysis indicates a widening gender pay gap, showing a substantial income disparity where women, despite working full-time, face a more significant wage discrepancy compared to men in the same roles.Remarkably, across all roles, including non-full-time employment, women displayed a lower gender pay gap percentage. This indicates that Liberty Center offers better opportunities for women in non-full-time positions.
https://i.neilsberg.com/ch/liberty-center-oh-income-by-gender.jpeg" alt="Liberty Center, OH gender based income disparity">
When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2017-2021 5-Year Estimates. All incomes have been adjusting for inflation and are presented in 2022-inflation-adjusted dollars.
Gender classifications include:
Employment type classifications include:
Variables / Data Columns
Good to know
Margin of Error
Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.
Custom data
If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.
Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.
This dataset is a part of the main dataset for Liberty Center median household income by gender. You can refer the same here
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Context
The dataset presents median income data over a decade or more for males and females categorized by Total, Full-Time Year-Round (FT), and Part-Time (PT) employment in Napoleon. It showcases annual income, providing insights into gender-specific income distributions and the disparities between full-time and part-time work. The dataset can be utilized to gain insights into gender-based pay disparity trends and explore the variations in income for male and female individuals.
Key observations: Insights from 2021
Based on our analysis ACS 2017-2021 5-Year Estimates, we present the following observations: - All workers, aged 15 years and older: In Napoleon, the median income for all workers aged 15 years and older, regardless of work hours, was $23,870 for males and $23,707 for females.
Based on these incomes, we observe a gender gap percentage of approximately 1%, indicating a significant disparity between the median incomes of males and females in Napoleon. Women, regardless of work hours, still earn 99 cents to each dollar earned by men, highlighting an ongoing gender-based wage gap.
- Full-time workers, aged 15 years and older: In Napoleon, among full-time, year-round workers aged 15 years and older, males earned a median income of $41,885, while females earned $27,698, leading to a 34% gender pay gap among full-time workers. This illustrates that women earn 66 cents for each dollar earned by men in full-time roles. This level of income gap emphasizes the urgency to address and rectify this ongoing disparity, where women, despite working full-time, face a more significant wage discrepancy compared to men in the same employment roles.Remarkably, across all roles, including non-full-time employment, women displayed a lower gender pay gap percentage. This indicates that Napoleon offers better opportunities for women in non-full-time positions.
https://i.neilsberg.com/ch/napoleon-in-income-by-gender.jpeg" alt="Napoleon, IN gender based income disparity">
When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2017-2021 5-Year Estimates. All incomes have been adjusting for inflation and are presented in 2022-inflation-adjusted dollars.
Gender classifications include:
Employment type classifications include:
Variables / Data Columns
Good to know
Margin of Error
Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.
Custom data
If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.
Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.
This dataset is a part of the main dataset for Napoleon median household income by gender. You can refer the same here
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Context
The dataset presents median income data over a decade or more for males and females categorized by Total, Full-Time Year-Round (FT), and Part-Time (PT) employment in Port Washington. It showcases annual income, providing insights into gender-specific income distributions and the disparities between full-time and part-time work. The dataset can be utilized to gain insights into gender-based pay disparity trends and explore the variations in income for male and female individuals.
Key observations: Insights from 2021
Based on our analysis ACS 2017-2021 5-Year Estimates, we present the following observations: - All workers, aged 15 years and older: In Port Washington, the median income for all workers aged 15 years and older, regardless of work hours, was $28,224 for males and $27,801 for females.
Based on these incomes, we observe a gender gap percentage of approximately 1%, indicating a significant disparity between the median incomes of males and females in Port Washington. Women, regardless of work hours, still earn 99 cents to each dollar earned by men, highlighting an ongoing gender-based wage gap.
- Full-time workers, aged 15 years and older: In Port Washington, among full-time, year-round workers aged 15 years and older, males earned a median income of $51,794, while females earned $29,098, leading to a 44% gender pay gap among full-time workers. This illustrates that women earn 56 cents for each dollar earned by men in full-time roles. This level of income gap emphasizes the urgency to address and rectify this ongoing disparity, where women, despite working full-time, face a more significant wage discrepancy compared to men in the same employment roles.Remarkably, across all roles, including non-full-time employment, women displayed a lower gender pay gap percentage. This indicates that Port Washington offers better opportunities for women in non-full-time positions.
https://i.neilsberg.com/ch/port-washington-oh-income-by-gender.jpeg" alt="Port Washington, OH gender based income disparity">
When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2017-2021 5-Year Estimates. All incomes have been adjusting for inflation and are presented in 2022-inflation-adjusted dollars.
Gender classifications include:
Employment type classifications include:
Variables / Data Columns
Good to know
Margin of Error
Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.
Custom data
If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.
Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.
This dataset is a part of the main dataset for Port Washington median household income by gender. You can refer the same here
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Context
The dataset presents median income data over a decade or more for males and females categorized by Total, Full-Time Year-Round (FT), and Part-Time (PT) employment in Prescott. It showcases annual income, providing insights into gender-specific income distributions and the disparities between full-time and part-time work. The dataset can be utilized to gain insights into gender-based pay disparity trends and explore the variations in income for male and female individuals.
Key observations: Insights from 2021
Based on our analysis ACS 2017-2021 5-Year Estimates, we present the following observations: - All workers, aged 15 years and older: In Prescott, the median income for all workers aged 15 years and older, regardless of work hours, was $38,102 for males and $37,682 for females.
Based on these incomes, we observe a gender gap percentage of approximately 1%, indicating a significant disparity between the median incomes of males and females in Prescott. Women, regardless of work hours, still earn 99 cents to each dollar earned by men, highlighting an ongoing gender-based wage gap.
- Full-time workers, aged 15 years and older: In Prescott, among full-time, year-round workers aged 15 years and older, males earned a median income of $56,883, while females earned $44,588, leading to a 22% gender pay gap among full-time workers. This illustrates that women earn 78 cents for each dollar earned by men in full-time roles. This analysis indicates a widening gender pay gap, showing a substantial income disparity where women, despite working full-time, face a more significant wage discrepancy compared to men in the same roles.Remarkably, across all roles, including non-full-time employment, women displayed a lower gender pay gap percentage. This indicates that Prescott offers better opportunities for women in non-full-time positions.
https://i.neilsberg.com/ch/prescott-ia-income-by-gender.jpeg" alt="Prescott, IA gender based income disparity">
When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2017-2021 5-Year Estimates. All incomes have been adjusting for inflation and are presented in 2022-inflation-adjusted dollars.
Gender classifications include:
Employment type classifications include:
Variables / Data Columns
Good to know
Margin of Error
Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.
Custom data
If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.
Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.
This dataset is a part of the main dataset for Prescott median household income by gender. You can refer the same here
Not seeing a result you expected?
Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.
Facebook
TwitterIn 2022, San Francisco had the highest median household income of cities ranking within the top 25 in terms of population, with a median household income in of 136,692 U.S. dollars. In that year, San Jose in California was ranked second, and Seattle, Washington third.
Following a fall after the great recession, median household income in the United States has been increasing in recent years. As of 2022, median household income by state was highest in Maryland, Washington, D.C., Utah, and Massachusetts. It was lowest in Mississippi, West Virginia, and Arkansas. Families with an annual income of 25,000 and 49,999 U.S. dollars made up the largest income bracket in America, with about 25.26 million households.
Data on median household income can be compared to statistics on personal income in the U.S. released by the Bureau of Economic Analysis. Personal income rose to around 21.8 trillion U.S. dollars in 2022, the highest value recorded. Personal income is a measure of the total income received by persons from all sources, while median household income is “the amount with divides the income distribution into two equal groups,” according to the U.S. Census Bureau. Half of the population in question lives above median income and half lives below. Though total personal income has increased in recent years, this wealth is not distributed throughout the population. In practical terms, income of most households has decreased. One additional statistic illustrates this disparity: for the lowest quintile of workers, mean household income has remained more or less steady for the past decade at about 13 to 16 thousand constant U.S. dollars annually. Meanwhile, income for the top five percent of workers has actually risen from about 285,000 U.S. dollars in 1990 to about 499,900 U.S. dollars in 2020.