Crude Oil Production in the United States increased to 13468 BBL/D/1K in April from 13450 BBL/D/1K in March of 2025. This dataset provides the latest reported value for - United States Crude Oil Production - plus previous releases, historical high and low, short-term forecast and long-term prediction, economic calendar, survey consensus and news.

Weekly Crude Oil Production in the United States decreased to 13385 Thousand Barrels Per Day in July 4 from 13433 Thousand Barrels Per Day in the previous week. This dataset includes a chart with historical data for the United States Weekly Crude Oil Production.

United States Crude Oil Supply: Field Production data was reported at 11,142.000 1000 Barrel/Day in Oct 2018. This records an increase from the previous number of 11,047.000 1000 Barrel/Day for Sep 2018. United States Crude Oil Supply: Field Production data is updated monthly, averaging 7,435.340 1000 Barrel/Day from Jan 1973 (Median) to Oct 2018, with 550 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 11,345.511 1000 Barrel/Day in Aug 2018 and a record low of 3,973.586 1000 Barrel/Day in Sep 2008. United States Crude Oil Supply: Field Production data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Energy Information Administration. The data is categorized under Global Database’s United States – Table US.RB016: Petroleum Overview.

United States Oil Production: New-Well: Haynesville data was reported at 0.000 Barrel/Day th in Mar 2025. This stayed constant from the previous number of 0.000 Barrel/Day th for Feb 2025. United States Oil Production: New-Well: Haynesville data is updated monthly, averaging 1.000 Barrel/Day th from Jan 2007 (Median) to Mar 2025, with 219 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 2.000 Barrel/Day th in Nov 2012 and a record low of 0.000 Barrel/Day th in Mar 2025. United States Oil Production: New-Well: Haynesville data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by U.S. Energy Information Administration. The data is categorized under Global Database’s United States – Table US.RB040: Oil Production: by Region.

Crude Oil rose to 68.75 USD/Bbl on July 11, 2025, up 3.27% from the previous day. Over the past month, Crude Oil's price has risen 1.04%, but it is still 16.37% lower than a year ago, according to trading on a contract for difference (CFD) that tracks the benchmark market for this commodity. Crude Oil - values, historical data, forecasts and news - updated on July of 2025.

Oil Exports in the United States decreased to 7414 USD Million in May from 8098 USD Million in April of 2025. This dataset provides - United States Crude Oil Exports- actual values, historical data, forecast, chart, statistics, economic calendar and news.

United States Crude Oil Supply: Annual: Field Production: Total data was reported at 8,857.284 1000 Barrel/Day in 2017. This records an increase from the previous number of 8,341.136 1000 Barrel/Day for 2016. United States Crude Oil Supply: Annual: Field Production: Total data is updated yearly, averaging 6,813.540 1000 Barrel/Day from Dec 1949 (Median) to 2017, with 69 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 9,407.764 1000 Barrel/Day in 1970 and a record low of 4,316.903 1000 Barrel/Day in 2008. United States Crude Oil Supply: Annual: Field Production: Total data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Energy Information Administration. The data is categorized under Global Database’s United States – Table US.RB017: Petroleum Overview: by Product.

The 2025 annual OPEC oil price stood at ***** U.S. dollars per barrel, as of May. This would be lower than the 2024 average, which amounted to ***** U.S. dollars. The abbreviation OPEC stands for Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and includes Algeria, Angola, Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Gabon, Iraq, Iran, Kuwait, Libya, Nigeria, Saudi Arabia, Venezuela, and the United Arab Emirates. The aim of the OPEC is to coordinate the oil policies of its member states. It was founded in 1960 in Baghdad, Iraq. The OPEC Reference Basket The OPEC crude oil price is defined by the price of the so-called OPEC (Reference) basket. This basket is an average of prices of the various petroleum blends that are produced by the OPEC members. Some of these oil blends are, for example: Saharan Blend from Algeria, Basra Light from Iraq, Arab Light from Saudi Arabia, BCF 17 from Venezuela, et cetera. By increasing and decreasing its oil production, OPEC tries to keep the price between a given maxima and minima. Benchmark crude oil The OPEC basket is one of the most important benchmarks for crude oil prices worldwide. Other significant benchmarks are UK Brent, West Texas Intermediate (WTI), and Dubai Crude (Fateh). Because there are many types and grades of oil, such benchmarks are indispensable for referencing them on the global oil market. The 2025 fall in prices was the result of weakened demand outlooks exacerbated by extensive U.S. trade tariffs.

United States Shale Oil Production: Eagle Ford data was reported at 1.212 MN Barrel/Day in Apr 2019. This records an increase from the previous number of 1.212 MN Barrel/Day for Mar 2019. United States Shale Oil Production: Eagle Ford data is updated monthly, averaging 0.003 MN Barrel/Day from Jan 2000 (Median) to Apr 2019, with 232 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 1.619 MN Barrel/Day in Mar 2015 and a record low of 0.000 MN Barrel/Day in May 2003. United States Shale Oil Production: Eagle Ford data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Energy Information Administration. The data is categorized under Global Database’s United States – Table US.RB022: Shale Oil Production.

Canada has abundant resources of crude oil, with an estimated remaining ultimate potential of 52.3 106m³ (329 billion barrels) as of December 2017. Of this, oil sands account for 92 per cent. There are two major producing areas in Canada, the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin, which includes Alberta, Saskatchewan and parts of British Columbia and Manitoba, and offshore eastern Canada. Oil is also produced in modest volumes in Ontario and the Northwest Territories. Although Canada was the 4th largest producer in the world in 2018, it produces only about five per cent of total daily production, so it does not have a major influence on the world oil prices. In 2018, 96 per cent of Canadian crude exports went to the U.S. The Canada Energy Regulator regulates the export of crude oil. Holders of export authorizations report monthly statistics on export activities. This dataset provides historical export volumes of crude oil (by year and month), and by either type of oil or by destination of export.

United States Oil Production per Rig: New-Well: Haynesville data was reported at 23.681 Barrel/Day in Apr 2020. This records an increase from the previous number of 23.627 Barrel/Day for Mar 2020. United States Oil Production per Rig: New-Well: Haynesville data is updated monthly, averaging 21.986 Barrel/Day from Jan 2007 (Median) to Apr 2020, with 160 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 28.774 Barrel/Day in May 2016 and a record low of 2.989 Barrel/Day in Nov 2010. United States Oil Production per Rig: New-Well: Haynesville data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Energy Information Administration. The data is categorized under Global Database’s United States – Table US.RB019: Oil Production: by Region .

Energy Information Administration (2017). International Energy Statistics: Petroleum | Country: French Guiana | Category: Bunker | Series: Distillate Fuel Oil | Units: Barrels Per Day, 1989-2006. Data-Planet™ Statistical Ready Reference by Conquest Systems, Inc. [Data-file]. Dataset-ID: 004-015-006. Dataset: Reports statistics related to consumption, production, trade, and more, of petroleum by nation and nation aggregates. The dataset provides data for over 200 countries, as available, on energy-related metrics, including production, consumption, reserves and capacity, imports, and exports, by energy source. Data are sourced from Energy Information Administration research, as well as from national and international agencies, listed at http://www.eia.gov/cfapps/ipdbproject/docs/sources.cfm. Category: International Relations and Trade, Energy Resources and Industries Source: Energy Information Administration The Energy Information Administration (EIA), created by Congress in 1977, is an independent statistical and analytical agency within the United States Department of Energy. Its mission is to provide policy-independent data, forecasts, and analyses to promote sound policy making, efficient markets, and public understanding regarding energy and its interaction with the economy and the environment. http://www.eia.doe.gov/ Subject: Fuel Consumption, International Trade, Energy Consumption, Petroleum Products, Imports, Petroleum Reserves, Exports, Petroleum, Energy Production

In 1948 the United States became a net importer of oil. Coupled with an unprecedented domestic production of 5,900,000 barrels daily, imports approximating 500,000 barrels made available a total supply of 6,400,000 barrels a day. Thus, by herculean effort, the oil inductry was able to meet an extraordinary demand at home and, in addition, to ship abroad almost 400,000 barrels daily of petroleum and products.

Geological studies have shown that there are many surface or near-surface deposits in the United States that contain large quantities of petroleum. In the State of Wyoming, a high concentration of such deposits exists in the Wind River, Big Horn, and Powder River Basins. These shallow deposits typically occur as unconsolidated or friable formations that contain millions of barrels of oil. Conventional petroleum production techniques have been attempted in many of these deposits with little or no economic success. In an attempt to improve the production economics, the Western Research Institute was solicited to develop a technique for the recovery of oil from these deposits. WRI, with support from the Economic and Community Development Division of the State of Wyoming, and as a part of the WRI/US Department of Energy, Jointly Sponsored Research program, proposed to develop, test, and demonstrate a viable and economical technology for the recovery of oil using mining and surface recovery processes. Reneau Energy, Inc. of La Quinta, California, agreed to participate in the project in providing a test site and mined materials. The goal of the proposed project to be completed in two phases, was to develop existing energy resources which are not presently being utilized. Phase 1 of the project, consisting of six specific tasks, was conducted to evaluate the suitability of various surface processing schemes. Phase 1 also included gravity drainage tests to determine if recovery techniques such as horizontal drilling could be applied. Phase 1 work was completed, and a final report was prepared and submitted to the funding agencies. Based on the results obtained in Phase 1 of the project, fluidized-bed based thermal recovery appeared to be a viable option. A 100 tons per day pilot plant was designed, constructed, and operated in the field. This report describes the results and experiences of the Phase 2 testing.

United States Crude Oil Supply: Field Production: Alaskan data was reported at 487.000 1000 Barrel/Day in Oct 2018. This records an increase from the previous number of 471.000 1000 Barrel/Day for Sep 2018. United States Crude Oil Supply: Field Production: Alaskan data is updated monthly, averaging 1,005.064 1000 Barrel/Day from Jan 1973 (Median) to Oct 2018, with 550 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 2,086.065 1000 Barrel/Day in Mar 1988 and a record low of 148.613 1000 Barrel/Day in May 1976. United States Crude Oil Supply: Field Production: Alaskan data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Energy Information Administration. The data is categorized under Global Database’s United States – Table US.RB017: Petroleum Overview: by Product.

The top of the Upper Cretaceous Dakota Sandstone is present in the subsurface throughout the Uinta and Piceance basins of UT and CO and is easily recognized in the subsurface from geophysical well logs. This digital data release captures in digital form the results of two previously published contoured subsurface maps that were constructed on the top of Dakota Sandstone datum; one of the studies also included a map constructed on the top of the overlying Mancos Shale. A structure contour map of the top of the Dakota Sandstone was constructed as part of a U.S. Geological Survey Petroleum Systems and Geologic Assessment of Oil and Gas in the Uinta-Piceance Province, Utah and Colorado (Roberts, 2003). This surface, constructed using data from oil and gas wells, from digital geologic maps of Utah and Colorado, and from thicknesses of overlying stratigraphic units, depicts the overall configuration of major structural trends of the present-day Uinta and Piceance basins and was used to define the elevation of the base of a specific source-rock interval as part of the assessment. A second structure contour map of the top of the Dakota Sandstone, along with a contoured map showing the elevation of the top of the overlying Mancos Shale, was constructed from well data as part of a stratigraphic research thesis of the Douglas Creek Arch, a structural high which separates the Uinta and Piceance basins (Kuzniak, 2009). This digital dataset contains spatial datasets corresponding to the structure contour maps of the top of the Dakota Sandstone produced by the U.S. Geological Survey's petroleum assessment (Roberts, 2003) and the topical studies along the Douglas Creek Arch (Kuzniak, 2009). Both structure contour maps of the top of the Dakota Sandstone were digitized and attributed as GIS data sets so that these data could be used in digital form as part of U.S. Geological Survey and other studies of these basins. The contours depicting the elevation of the top of the Dakota Sandstone are contained in line feature classes within a geographic information system geodatabase and are also saved as individual shapefiles. Feature classes have a single attribute, elevation, that represents the contoured value. Contoured values are given in feet, to maintain consistency with the original publication, and in meters. Nonspatial tables define the data sources used, define terms used in the dataset, and describe the geologic units. A tabular data dictionary describes the entity and attribute information for all attributes of the geospatial data and the accompanying nonspatial tables.

This dataset contains: California Dairies, Food Processing Facilities, Wastewater treatment facilities with digesters (AZ, NV, HI, CA), California Landfills, California Organic Collection Programs, California Fat/Oil/Grease Collection Sites, Fat/Oil/Grease Haulers (AZ, NV, CA). List of dairies located in California that do not use anaerobic digesters to produce biogas, and estimates of how much biogas could be produced if these dairies were to use anaerobic digesters to manage dairy waste. The Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board provided EPA Region 9 with herd size data by from their 2005 General Waste Discharge annual report (contact person at the Water Quality Control Board: Doug Patterson, Doug.Patteson@waterboards.ca.gov). List of food processing facilities (in NV, AZ, CA, HI) producing waste that could be used for co-digestion at wastewater treatment facilities and other entities with anaerobic digesters. The facilities included were based on a list of businesses classified by the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) as food manufacturing businesses. Dunn and Bradstreet compiled the list in 2010 per the request by the EPA. List of Wastewater Treatment Facilities (WWTF) with anaerobic digesters in Arizona. The list of facilities was obtained from the annual biosolids report required under 40 CFR 503 (Standards for the Use or Disposal of Sewage Sludge) for WWTF with influent flows over 1 million gallons per day. Original data set was based on 2004 reporting, which was the last year Arizona WWTFs were required to report to the EPA, but was partially updated based on direct communication between EPA Region 9’s Sustainable Infrastructure program and some of the WWTFs. List of Wastewater Treatment Facilities (WWTFs) with anaerobic digesters (in NV, HI). The list of facilities was obtained from the annual biosolids report required under 40 CFR 503 (Standards for the Use or Disposal of Sewage Sludge) for WWTFs with influent flows over 1 million gallons per day. The data used by the Waste to Biogas Mapping tool can and have been updated based on request through a web interface and by the EPA Region 9 Sustainable Infrastructure program. California Organic Collection Programs: List of organic collection programs in California that have the potential to provide waste for co-digestion at Wastewater Treatment Facilities and other entities that use anaerobic digesters. A study conducted by New Found Lands Institute in 2008 with a grant provided by EPA Region 9 was the source of the information about organic collection programs. List of Fat, Oil, and Grease (FOG) hauling and rendering companies serving locations in the State of California and that have the potential to provide FOG for co-digestion at Wastewater Treatment Facilities and other entities that use anaerobic digesters. EPA Region 9’s Sustainable Infrastructure program obtained the data from the CalFOG website in 2009. The list of haulers on the CalFOG website can be found here: http://www.calfog.org/Hauler.html. Updates to the CalFOG website are not automatically reflected in the Waste to Biogas Mapping Tool. The data used by the Waste to Biogas Mapping tool can and have been updated based on request through a web interface and by the EPA Region 9 Sustainable Infrastructure program. List of Fat, Oil, and Grease (FOG) hauling companies serving locations in the State of Arizona and that have the potential to provide FOG for co-digestion at Wastewater Treatment Facilities and other entities that use anaerobic digesters. EPA Region 9’s Sustainable Infrastructure program obtained the data from the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality in 2009 (contact: Barbara M. Waterbury, Waterbury.Barbara@azdeq.gov and Steven Schoen,) steven.schoen@phoenix.gov). The data used by the Waste to Biogas Mapping tool can and have been updated based on request through a web interface and by the EPA Region 9 Sustainable Infrastructure program.

Oil shales represents the United States'second (after coal) most abundant fossil energy source. The Green River deposits in the West and the Devonian deposits in the East/Great Lakes are the principal oil shale deposits. This paper discusses in depth: the technology of recovering shale oil (retorting either above ground or in situ,9688 ); refining of shale oil by hydrotreating and/or cracking; environmental impacts of retorting oil shales; economic analysis of shale oil refinery; and military applications of middle distillates from shale oils. At present the Parachute Creek, Colorado project of the Union Oil Company is the only active commercial scale shale oil project in operation. Union is building a 10,000 barrel per day plant at a cost of $600 million. The plant will be completed by midyear and be in operation by the end of 1983. The Department of Defense is guaranteeing a price of at least $42.50/barrel for the finished product, JP-4 jet fuel and diesel fuel made to military specifications. The overall conclusion that can be reached is that state-of-the-art, commercially practical refining processes are available to produce high quality fuels from shale oil at a cost which should make this resource a highly important part of our energy supply and therefore of our national security.

Oil and Gas Lease contains spatial and tabular data potraying Competitive and Non-Competitive Oil and Gas Leases, and Oil and Gas Storage Leases issued by the Alaska Department of Natural Resources. This spatial data set characterizes the geographic representation of land parcels within the State of Alaska contained by the Oil and Gas Lease category. It has been extracted from data sets used to produce the State status plats. This data set includes cases noted on the digital status plats up to one day prior to data extraction. Each feature has an associated attribute record, including a Land Administration System (LAS) file-type and file-number which serves as an index to related LAS case-file information. Additional LAS case-file and customer information may be obtained at: http://www.dnr.state.ak.us/las/LASMenu.cfm Those requiring more information regarding State land records should contact the Alaska Department of Natural Resources Public Information Center directly.

United States Shale Oil Production: Others data was reported at 0.344 MN Barrel/Day in Apr 2019. This records an increase from the previous number of 0.343 MN Barrel/Day for Mar 2019. United States Shale Oil Production: Others data is updated monthly, averaging 0.167 MN Barrel/Day from Jan 2000 (Median) to Apr 2019, with 232 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 0.407 MN Barrel/Day in Apr 2015 and a record low of 0.138 MN Barrel/Day in Feb 2007. United States Shale Oil Production: Others data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Energy Information Administration. The data is categorized under Global Database’s United States – Table US.RB022: Shale Oil Production.