Steel fell to 3,086 CNY/T on October 10, 2025, down 0.29% from the previous day. Over the past month, Steel's price has risen 2.12%, but it is still 8.70% lower than a year ago, according to trading on a contract for difference (CFD) that tracks the benchmark market for this commodity. Steel - values, historical data, forecasts and news - updated on October of 2025.

HRC Steel rose to 814 USD/T on October 10, 2025, up 0.12% from the previous day. Over the past month, HRC Steel's price has risen 0.49%, and is up 15.46% compared to the same time last year, according to trading on a contract for difference (CFD) that tracks the benchmark market for this commodity. This dataset includes a chart with historical data for HRC Steel.

Metal and Steel Price: Delhi: Cold Rolled Coils 0.63 mm data was reported at 68,640.000 INR/Metric Ton in Apr 2025. This records an increase from the previous number of 67,460.000 INR/Metric Ton for Mar 2025. Metal and Steel Price: Delhi: Cold Rolled Coils 0.63 mm data is updated monthly, averaging 48,792.000 INR/Metric Ton from Aug 2003 (Median) to Apr 2025, with 257 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 96,760.000 INR/Metric Ton in Apr 2022 and a record low of 25,300.000 INR/Metric Ton in Oct 2003. Metal and Steel Price: Delhi: Cold Rolled Coils 0.63 mm data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Joint Plant Committee. The data is categorized under India Premium Database’s Metal and Steel Sector – Table IN.WAC008: Metal and Steel Retail Prices: New Delhi: Monthly.

Iron Ore rose to 105.74 USD/T on October 10, 2025, up 0.84% from the previous day. Over the past month, Iron Ore's price has risen 0.53%, but it is still 0.66% lower than a year ago, according to trading on a contract for difference (CFD) that tracks the benchmark market for this commodity. Iron Ore - values, historical data, forecasts and news - updated on October of 2025.

Metal and Steel Price: Delhi: Cold Rolled Coils 1.00 mm data was reported at 67,850.000 INR/Metric Ton in Apr 2025. This records an increase from the previous number of 66,080.000 INR/Metric Ton for Mar 2025. Metal and Steel Price: Delhi: Cold Rolled Coils 1.00 mm data is updated monthly, averaging 48,690.000 INR/Metric Ton from Aug 2003 (Median) to Apr 2025, with 257 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 94,990.000 INR/Metric Ton in Apr 2022 and a record low of 24,300.000 INR/Metric Ton in Oct 2003. Metal and Steel Price: Delhi: Cold Rolled Coils 1.00 mm data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Joint Plant Committee. The data is categorized under India Premium Database’s Metal and Steel Sector – Table IN.WAC008: Metal and Steel Retail Prices: New Delhi: Monthly.

This U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) data release provides the descriptions of the only U.S. sites—including mineral regions, mineral occurrences, and mine features—that have reported production and (or) resources of tantalum (Ta). The sites in this data release have contained resource and (or) past production of more than 900 metric tons Ta metal, which was the approximate average annual consumption of Ta in the U.S. from 2016 through 2020. This dataset contains the Bokan Mountain deposit in Alaska and the Round Top deposit in Texas. Tantalum primarily occurs in the mineral tantalite, which may be found in carbonatites, alkaline granite-syenite complexes, and lithium-cesium-tantalum (LCT) pegmatites. The largest Ta deposits can be found in Australia, where the Greenbushes and Wodgina Mines have been producing Ta from pegmatites since the late 1880s. The Greenbushes is an LCT pegmatite deposit that contains more than 135 million metric tons of ore with an average grade of 0.022 percent Ta2O5. The Wodgina LCT pegmatite deposit contains more than 85 million metric tons of ore at a grade of 0.032 percent Ta2O5 (Schulz and others, 2017). In comparison, the largest Ta deposit in the U.S. is the Round Top deposit in Texas, which has reported resources of more than 480 million metric tons with an average grade of 67.2 grams per metric ton Ta2O5 (Hulse and others, 2019). There are no current U.S. producers of Ta. Tantalum is necessary for strategic, consumer, and commercial applications. Tantalum is highly conductive to heat and electricity and known for its resistance to acidic corrosion, thereby making this metal an ideal component for electronic capacitors, telecommunications, data storage, and implantable medical devices. In 2020, the U.S. was 100 percent net import reliant on Ta from countries such as China, Germany, Australia, and others. Tantalum is imported to the U.S. as ore and concentrate, metal and powder, as well as waste and scrap (U.S. Geological Survey, 2021). The entries and descriptions in the database were derived from published papers, reports, data, and internet documents representing a variety of sources, including geologic and exploration studies described in State, Federal, and industry reports. Resources extracted from older sources might not be compliant with current rules and guidelines in minerals industry standards such as National Instrument 43-101 (NI 43-101). The presence of a Ta mineral deposit in this database is not meant to imply that the deposit is currently economic. Rather, these deposits were included to capture the characteristics of the largest Ta deposits in the United States. Inclusion of material in the database is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. The authors welcome additional published information in order to continually update and refine this dataset. Hulse, D.E., Malhotra, D., Matthews, T., and Emanuel, C., 2019, NI 43-101 preliminary economic assessment Round Top project, Sierra Blanca, Texas, prepared for USA Rare Earth LLC and Texas Mineral Resources Corp. [Filing Date July 1, 2019]: Gustavson Associates, LLC, 218 p., accessed October 17, 2019, at http://usarareearth.com/. Schulz, K.J., Piatak, N.M., and Papp, J.F., 2017, Niobium and tantalum, chap. M of Schulz, K.J., DeYoung, J.H., Jr., Seal, R.R., II, and Bradley, D.C., eds., Critical mineral resources of the United States—Economic and environmental geology and prospects for future supply: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1802, p. M1–M34, https://doi.org/10.3133/pp1802M. U.S. Geological Survey, 2021, Mineral commodity summaries 2021: U.S. Geological Survey, 200 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/mcs2021.

This data for global, regional (EU-27), and country-specific (G20 member countries) energy and emission pathways required to achieve a defined carbon budget of under 450 Gt/CO2, developed to limit the mean global temperature rise to 1.5°C, over 50% likelihood. The data were calculated with the 1.5°C sectorial pathways of the One Earth Climate Model—an integrated energy assessment model devised at the University of Technology Sydney (UTS). The data consist of the following six zip-folder datasets (refer to Section 2 for an explanation of the data): 1. Appendix folder: Each file contains one worksheet, which summarizes the overall 1.5°C scenario. 2. Sector folder (XLSX): Each file contains one worksheet, which summarizes the industry sectors analysed. 3. Sector folder (CSV): The data contained are the same as those described in point 2. 4. Sector emissions folder: Each file contains one worksheet, which summarizes the total annual emissions for each industry sector. 5. Scope emissions folder (XLSX): Each file contains one worksheet, which summarizes the total annual emissions for each industry sector—with the additional specificity of emission scope. 6. Scope emissions folder (CSV): The data contained are the same as those described in point 5. Methods The data consist of the following six zipped dataset folders, each containing 21 separate files for each of the areas assessed. 1. Appendix zip folder: contains 21 XLSX files. Each file contains one worksheet, which summarizes the overall 1.5 °C scenario. This tab is called the ‘Appendix’ and contains: electricity generation (TWh/a), transport—final energy (PJ/a), heat supply and air conditioning (PJ/a), installed capacity (GW), final energy demand (PJ/a), energy-related CO2 emissions (million tons/a), and primary energy demand (PJ/a). 2. Sector zip folder (XLSX): contains 21 XLSX files. Each file contains one worksheet, which summarizes the industry sectors analysed. Key industry metrics are provided, such as the energy and carbon intensities of the GICS sectors analysed. Due to industry specificity—and the choice of methodology—the units of data vary between the different sectors. 3. Sector zip folder (CSV): contains 21 CSV files. The data contained are the same as those described in point 2. However, the data have been organized in a database layout and saved in the CSV file format, significantly improving data parsing. 4. Sector emission zip folder: contains 21 XLSX files. Each file contains one worksheet, which summarizes the total annual emissions (MtCO2/a) for each industry sector. 5. Scope emissions zip folder (XLSX): contains 21 XLSX files. Each file contains one worksheet, which summarizes the total annual emissions (MtCO2/a) for each industry sector—and specifies the emission scopes. This tab also provides an additional breakdown of emissions into the categories of CO2 and total GHG emissions. Two accounting methodologies are presented: (i) the OECM approach, which defines Scope 1 emissions as those related to heat and energy use; and (ii) the production-centric approach, which places the emission burden of other non-energy and Scope 3 emissions on the producer, because they are categorized as Scope 1 emissions. 6. Scope emissions zip folder (CSV): contains 21 CSV files. The data contained are the same as those described in point 5. However, the data have been organized in a database layout and saved in the CSV file format to improve data parsing. The six datasets are summarized in Table 1, with further information on the data presented in the following sub-sections. Table 1: Overview of the data files/datasets

Label

Name of data file/dataset

File types

Data repository and identifier (DOI or accession number)

Dataset 1

Appendix

XLSX

https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.cz8w9gj82

Dataset 2

Sector_XLSX

XLSX

https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.cz8w9gj82

Dataset 3

Sector_CSV

CSV

https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.cz8w9gj82

Dataset 4

Sector_Emission

XLSX

https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.cz8w9gj82

Dataset 5

Scope_Emission_XLSX

XLSX

https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.cz8w9gj82

Dataset 6

Scope_Emission_CSV

CSV

https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.cz8w9gj82

1.1. Description of data parameters The datasets contain the following scenario input parameters: 1. Market development: current and assumed development of the demand by sector, such as cement produced, passenger kilometers travelled, or assumed market volume in US$2015 gross domestic product (GDP). 2. Energy intensity—activity based: energy use per unit of service and/or product; for example, in megajoules (MJ) per passenger kilometer travelled (MJ/pkm), MJ per ton of steel (MJ/ton steel), aluminum, or cement. 3. Energy intensity—finance based: energy use per unit of investment in MJ per US$ GDP (MJ/$GDP) contributed by, for example, the forestry or agricultural sector. The dataset contains the following scenario output parameters: 4. Carbon intensity: current and future carbon intensities per unit of product or service; for example, in tons of CO2 per ton of steel produced (tCO2/ton steel) or grams of carbon dioxide per passenger kilometer (gCO2/pkm). 5. Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions: datasets for each of the industry sectors and countries analysed. In addition to the emissions data, the deviations of the emissions from those of the year 2019 are provided. 6. Country scenarios: complete country scenario datasets of historical data (2012, 2015–2020) and future projections (2025–2050 in 5-year increments). Energy demand and supply data by technology, fuel, and sector are provided, including the overall energy and carbon emissions balance of the country analysed. 1.2. Geographic resolution: country data provided The dataset contains data for the following 21 countries and regions: · Regions: global, EU-27 · Countries: G20 member countries—Canada, USA, Mexico, Brazil, Argentina, Germany, France, Italy, United Kingdom, Türkiye, Russian Federation, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, Indonesia, India, China, Japan, South Korea, and Australia 1.3. Sectorial resolution: industry sector data provided The dataset contains data for the following industry sectors: Agriculture & food processing, forestry & wood products, chemical industry, aluminum industry, construction and buildings, water utilities, textile & leather industry, steel industry, cement industry, transport sector (aviation: freight & passenger transport; shipping: freight & passenger transport; and road transport: freight & passenger transport). 1.4. Time resolution The scenario data are provided for the years 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2025, 2030, 2035, 2040, 2045, and 2050.

Steel Production in the United States increased to 7200 Thousand Tonnes in August from 7100 Thousand Tonnes in July of 2025. This dataset has Steel Production values for United States.

Metal and Steel Price: Delhi: Hot Rolled Coils 2.50 mm data was reported at 62,250.000 INR/Metric Ton in Apr 2025. This records an increase from the previous number of 60,480.000 INR/Metric Ton for Mar 2025. Metal and Steel Price: Delhi: Hot Rolled Coils 2.50 mm data is updated monthly, averaging 44,140.000 INR/Metric Ton from Aug 2003 (Median) to Apr 2025, with 257 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 87,910.000 INR/Metric Ton in Apr 2022 and a record low of 21,000.000 INR/Metric Ton in Oct 2003. Metal and Steel Price: Delhi: Hot Rolled Coils 2.50 mm data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Joint Plant Committee. The data is categorized under India Premium Database’s Metal and Steel Sector – Table IN.WAC008: Metal and Steel Retail Prices: New Delhi: Monthly. [COVID-19-IMPACT]

To combat global warming, industry needs to find ways to reduce its carbon footprint. One way this can be done is by re-use of industrial flue gasses to produce value-added chemicals. Prime example feedstocks for the chemical industry are the three flue gasses produced during conventional steel production: blast furnace gas (BFG), basic oxygen furnace gas (BOFG), and coke oven gas (COG), due to their relatively high CO, CO2, or H2 content, allowing the production of carbon-based chemicals such as methanol or polymers. It is essential to know for decision-makers if using steel mill gas as a feedstock is more economically favorable and offers a lower global warming impact than benchmark CO and H2. Also, crucial information is which of the three steel mill gasses is the most favorable and under what conditions. This study presents a method for the estimation of the economic value and global warming impact of steel mill gasses, depending on the amount of steel mill gas being utilized by the steel production plant for different purposes at a given time and the economic cost and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions required to replace these usages. Furthermore, this paper investigates storage solutions for steel mill gas. Replacement cost per ton of CO is found to be less than the benchmark for both BFG (50–70 €/ton) and BOFG (100–130 €/ton), and replacement cost per ton of H2 (1800–2100 €/ton) is slightly less than the benchmark for COG. Of the three kinds of steel mill gas, blast furnace gas is found to be the most economically favorable while also requiring the least emissions to replace per ton of CO and CO2. The GHG emissions replacement required to use BFG (0.43–0.55 tons-CO2-eq./ton CO) is less than for conventional processes to produce CO and CO2, and therefore BFG, in particular, is a potentially desirable chemical feedstock. The method used by this model could also easily be used to determine the value of flue gasses from other industrial plants.

The steel rebar prices in the United States for Q3 2024 reached 860 USD/MT in September. The region experienced notable price drops amid declining demand and excess supply. Prices consistently trended downward, with a minor decrease at the end of the quarter. This persistent bearish sentiment highlighted ongoing challenges in stabilizing the market as excess supply continued to weigh heavily on pricing dynamics.

This dataset contains the analysis for the research article entitled "From symbiosis to scarcity: Evaluating disruption associated with decarbonisation to circular waste materials between the UK cement and steel sectors".Dataset available as an interlinked XLSX spreadsheet or as individual CSV files, where: ReadME) Dataset metadata, 1) A material flow analysis on the cement and concrete sector and the steel sector in the UK, 2) A material flow analysis on the cement and concrete sector, and the iron and steel sector globally, 3) Calculating the current and future carbon intensity of steel per tonne of product utilising the UK and global material flow analyses, 4) Calculating the current and future carbon intensity of cement per tonne of product utilising the UK and global material flow analyses, 5) Calculating the average transportation distance by sea from China, India, and Japan to the UK from the three largest ports (by economic value) from each country to the UK's three largest ports (by economic value), 6) Assessment of the current, and prediction of the future economic value of iron, steel, and GGBS under both import and export scenarions using historical UK trade data (2000 onwards), 7) Supplementary calculations related to the steel sector to support other sheet, 8) Supplementary calculations related to the steel sector to support other sheets.

About This Dataset: Copper Prices and Market Trends

    This dataset provides **insights into copper prices**, including current rates, historical trends, and key factors affecting price fluctuations. Copper is essential in **construction**, **electronics**, and **transportation** industries. Investors, traders, and analysts use accurate copper price data to guide decisions related to **trading**, **futures**, and **commodity investments**.

    ### **Key Features of the Dataset**

    #### **Live Market Data and Updates**
    Stay updated with the latest **copper price per pound** in USD. This data is sourced from exchanges like the **London Metal Exchange (LME)** and **COMEX**. Price fluctuations result from **global supply-demand shifts**, currency changes, and geopolitical factors.

    #### **Interactive Copper Price Charts**
    Explore **dynamic charts** showcasing real-time and historical price movements. These compare copper with **gold**, **silver**, and **aluminium**, offering insights into **market trends** and inter-metal correlations.

    ### **Factors Driving Copper Prices**

    #### **1. Supply and Demand Dynamics**
    Global copper supply is driven by mining activities in regions like **Peru**, **China**, and the **United States**. Disruptions in production or policy changes can cause **supply shocks**. On the demand side, **industrial growth** in countries like **India** and **China** sustains demand for copper.

    #### **2. Economic and Industry Trends**
    Copper prices often reflect **economic trends**. The push for **renewable energy** and **electric vehicles** has boosted long-term demand. Conversely, economic downturns and **inflation** can reduce demand, lowering prices.

    #### **3. Impact of Currency and Trade Policies**
    As a globally traded commodity, copper prices are influenced by **currency fluctuations** and **tariff policies**. A strong **US dollar** typically suppresses copper prices by increasing costs for international buyers. Trade tensions can also disrupt **commodity markets**.

    ### **Applications and Benefits**

    This dataset supports **commodity investors**, **traders**, and **industry professionals**:

    - **Investors** forecast price trends and manage **investment risks**. 
    - **Analysts** perform **market research** using price data to assess **copper futures**. 
    - **Manufacturers** optimize supply chains and **cost forecasts**.

    Explore more about copper investments on **Money Metals**:

    - [**Buy Copper Products**](https://www.moneymetals.com/buy/copper) 
    - [**95% Copper Pennies (Pre-1983)**](https://www.moneymetals.com/pre-1983-95-percent-copper-pennies/4) 
    - [**Copper Buffalo Rounds**](https://www.moneymetals.com/copper-buffalo-round-1-avdp-oz-999-pure-copper/297)

    ### **Copper Price Comparisons with Other Metals**

    Copper prices often correlate with those of **industrial** and **precious metals**:

    - **Gold** and **silver** are sensitive to **inflation** and currency shifts. 
    - **Iron ore** and **aluminium** reflect changes in **global demand** within construction and manufacturing sectors.

    These correlations help traders develop **hedging strategies** and **investment models**.

    ### **Data Variables and Availability**

    Key metrics include:

    - **Copper Price Per Pound:** The current market price in USD. 
    - **Copper Futures Price:** Data from **COMEX** futures contracts. 
    - **Historical Price Trends:** Long-term movements, updated regularly. 

    Data is available in **CSV** and **JSON** formats, enabling integration with analytical tools and platforms.

    ### **Conclusion**

    Copper price data is crucial for **monitoring global commodity markets**. From **mining** to **investment strategies**, copper impacts industries worldwide. Reliable data supports **risk management**, **planning**, and **economic forecasting**.

    For more tools and data, visit the **Money Metals** [Copper Prices Page](https://www.moneymetals.com/copper-prices).

Aluminum fell to 2,749.55 USD/T on October 10, 2025, down 1.31% from the previous day. Over the past month, Aluminum's price has risen 2.64%, and is up 4.23% compared to the same time last year, according to trading on a contract for difference (CFD) that tracks the benchmark market for this commodity. Aluminum - values, historical data, forecasts and news - updated on October of 2025.

This is version 2.0 of Tungsten Deposits in the United States. This data release provides the descriptions of approximately 100 U.S. sites that include mineral regions, mineral occurrences (deposits), and mine features that contain enrichments of tungsten (W). This data release reports on U.S. mines and deposits with greater than or equal to 215 metric tons of tungsten metal (30,000 short ton units of tungsten trioxide). Sites in this database occur in Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Idaho, Montana, North Carolina, New Mexico, Nevada, Texas, Utah and Washington. As a part of the process set forth by Executive Order 13817, the USGS National Minerals Information Center (NMIC) identified W as a critical mineral due to the import reliance and importance in the sectors of aerospace, defense, energy, and telecommunications (Department of the Interior, 2018; Fortier and others, 2018). Tungsten is necessary for strategic, consumer, and commercial applications. Due to its strength, hardness, and high melting and boiling points, W is used in wear-resistant applications, specialty steel and alloys, and electrical and chemical products. Tungsten minerals were an important part of the United States’ industrialization efforts and the domestic mining picture for a majority of the 20th century. Despite reduced domestic production, the need for W minerals and their downstream components remains high. As of 2020, the United States had a net import reliance of more than 50 percent for W, where the commodity is primarily being imported from China, Bolivia, Germany, and Spain (U.S. Geological Survey, 2020). Tungsten mineralogy is diverse; it occurs in a variety of minerals with the most common being scheelite, ferberite, and hübnerite. In the United States, W ore is most commonly derived from skarns, veins, and porphyry mineral deposits. The entries and descriptions in the database are derived from published papers, reports, data, and internet documents representing a variety of sources, including geologic and exploration studies described in State, Federal, and industry reports. Resource information extracted from older sources might not be compliant with current rules and guidelines in minerals industry standards such as National Instrument 43-101 (NI 43-101). The inclusion of a particular W mineral deposit in this database is not meant to imply that the deposit is currently economic. Rather, these deposits are included to capture the characteristics of the larger W deposits in the United States. Inclusion of material in the database is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. The authors welcome additional published information in order to continually update and refine this dataset. Department of the Interior, 2018, Final list of critical minerals 2018: Federal Register, v. 83, no. 97, p. 23295-23296, https://www.federalregister.gov/d/2018-10667. Fortier, S.M., Nassar, N.T., Lederer, G.W., Brainard, J., Gambogi, J., and McCullough, E.A., 2018, Draft critical mineral list—Summary of methodology and background information—U.S. Geological Survey technical input document in response to Secretarial Order No. 3359: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2018-1021, 15 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20181021. U.S. Geological Survey, 2020, Mineral commodity summaries 2020: U.S. Geological Survey, 200 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/ mcs2020.

Cold rolling oily sludge from the steel rolling process is considered hazardous waste and contains significant iron oxides and lubricants. The main component is 61.7% light oil, which is pyrolyzed at approximately 430 °C. Resource utilization is identified as a key pathway toward achieving sustainable disposal of cold rolling oily sludge. Prior researches on environmental assessment have been conducted for oilfield oily sludge disposal, applying these results to steel rolling oily sludge disposal may be biased, and the coking synergistic process for steel rolling oily sludge is in the pilot stage. Hence, focusing on the emerging technology of coking synergistic, the environmental impacts and economic feasibility of coking synergistic technology and the other two technologies (distillation-incineration and conventional incineration) were analyzed via life cycle assessment (LCA) and net present value methods. The results show that coking synergistic technology excelled in reducing environmental impacts, with a CO2 emission reduction exceeding 35.7%. Furthermore, coking synergistic technology breaks even within three months with a profit of 2260 CNY per ton. Further exploration of the potential for the diffusion of coking synergies (CS) in the provinces was carried out, and four alternatives to coking synergies were designed with different market shares (0, 10, 20, and 30%). The results indicate that cold rolling oily sludge disposal in Hebei Province contributes 37% of the national CO2 eq emissions. When coking synergistic technology becomes the primary alternative to hazardous waste incineration, national CO2 emissions are expected to be reduced by 26.7%. Considering that coking synergistic technology must be dependent on the steel plant, adopting coking synergistic technology for suitable steel plants not only optimizes the utilization of cold rolling oily sludge waste resources but also significantly improves environmental performance.

The method comprises the formation of a liquid metal wherein is introduced a coated wire of which the core contains a material consisting of a calcium alloy, said alloy containing at least 75% by mass of calcium and a total contents of at least 5% by mass of NI + Al. Preferred composition: at least 80% of calcium and up to 20% of Ni and/or Al. The tests carried out by means of the device represented in figure 1 have shown that it is possible to effect the introduction of the coated wire (10) into the flowing steel (2) at a rate from 80 to 120g of Ca per ton of flowing steel and per minute without causing an excessive boil. The invention also relates to the coated wire.

Copper fell to 4.80 USD/Lbs on October 10, 2025, down 6.16% from the previous day. Over the past month, Copper's price has risen 4.07%, and is up 7.81% compared to the same time last year, according to trading on a contract for difference (CFD) that tracks the benchmark market for this commodity. Copper - values, historical data, forecasts and news - updated on October of 2025.

Coal rose to 104.55 USD/T on October 10, 2025, up 0.05% from the previous day. Over the past month, Coal's price has risen 3.62%, but it is still 30.02% lower than a year ago, according to trading on a contract for difference (CFD) that tracks the benchmark market for this commodity. Coal - values, historical data, forecasts and news - updated on October of 2025.

Tin rose to 37,060 USD/T on October 9, 2025, up 1.82% from the previous day. Over the past month, Tin's price has risen 7.09%, and is up 12.93% compared to the same time last year, according to trading on a contract for difference (CFD) that tracks the benchmark market for this commodity. Tin - values, historical data, forecasts and news - updated on October of 2025.