Monthly state sales tax collections is an experimental dataset published by the U.S. Census Bureau. It provides data for collections from sales taxes including motor fuel taxes. Data reported for a specific month generally represent sales taxes collected on sales made during the prior month. Tax collections primarily rely on unaudited data collected from existing state reports or state data sources available from and posted on the Internet. Secondarily, states report the data via the Quarterly Survey of State and Local Tax Revenue. Data are updated monthly, but due to differing reporting cycles data for some states may lag.

Daily overview of federal revenue collections such as income tax deposits, customs duties, fees for government service, fines, and loan repayments.

The dataset contains the details of cess and surcharges collected each year and India's gross tax revenue.

The GTED collects all publicly available data on tax expenditures (TEs) published by national governments worldwide from 1990 onwards, covering a total of 218 jurisdictions. Based on a step-by-step search process, 109 jurisdictions are currently classified as Non-reporting Jurisdictions. The remaining 109 ones do provide some type of TE data, which was gathered by the GTED team.

Wherever available, the GTED gathers revenue forgone estimates and number of beneficiaries of individual TE provisions. It also gathers metadata including the definition of the TE provision, its legal basis and duration.

Each record in the GTED is classified in four main categories: Tax Type, Policy Objective, Beneficiaries and Type of TE used. In some cases, second- or third-level categories have been introduced. For instance, Fuel Tax data is categorised at the third level within Tax Type: Taxes on Good and Services Excise Taxes Fuel Tax. If the information for a record is not available or unclear, the respective category is classified as Not stated/unclear.

When governments do not publish provision-level data but rather some kind of aggregated information, the GTED gathers this aggregate data. Likewise, if governments report on specific areas of TE only (such as tax incentives for investments, or TEs on income taxes) the GTED presents data on these areas alone. The terms TE reporting or TE report are used broadly, and refer to a large variety of public documents, ranging from annual, comprehensive reports on TEs that are part of governmental budget documentation to individual documents issued by a public body and providing some aggregate information on some specific TE mechanisms. As a minimum requirement, reports must contain some kind of information on the actual use of TE provisions. For instance, a list of available tax deductions for investments, provided by a governmental investment promotion agency, would not be considered a TE report unless they provide revenue forgone estimates or any other data that would allow users of the GTED to obtain information about the actual use of the respective TEs.

The GTED distinguishes regular and irregular reporting. A sequence of reports from 1995 to 2005 would not be considered regular reporting in the GTED, since the country had reported on a yearly basis, but not anymore. Likewise, regular is not necessarily related to annual reporting. Germany, for instance, publishes federal subsidy reports including TE data every two years since 1967. A total of 16 such reports have been issued since 1990, containing data on 29 budget years (until 2021). The GTED counts this as 31 years reported, because data is provided on a year-by-year basis and can be consulted and analysed as such.

The data is processed in a consistent format seeking to increase the level of longitudinal and cross-country comparability. Whereas revenue forgone estimates are provided as reported by governments (in local currency units, current prices), the GTED also provides figures converted into US dollars as well as indicators providing the revenue forgone through TE provisions as shares both of GDP and Tax Revenue – to compute these two indicators, data from the UNU-WIDER Government Revenue Dataset is used as input. The share of revenue forgone as a percentage of Tax Revenue is computed using figures of total tax revenue collected by countries' central governments. The share of revenue forgone as a percentage of Tax Revenue is computed using figures of total tax revenue collected by countries' central governments.

Besides all the effort put into ensuring comparability, cross-country analysis of TE data needs to be done cautiously. The main issue, which is inherent to TE data, regards benchmarking. TEs are defined as departures from – usually country-specific – normal tax structures or benchmarks. On this note, the GTED uses the data published by official governmental institutions, sticking to their own definitions of benchmarks, without trying to complement official figures or challenge what different countries consider as the standard tax system or the benchmark.

When it comes to the methodology used by governments to compute the fiscal cost of TE provisions, the vast majority of countries report on TEs based on the revenue forgone approach that estimates the amount by which taxpayers have their tax liabilities reduced as a result of a TE based on their actual current economic behaviour. Since the revenue forgone methodology is static, the potential interconnections between different TE provisions are not taken into account when computing the fiscal cost of TEs based on it. Hence, aggregating revenue forgone estimates of the individual provisions computed separately and without taking behavioural changes into account would not result in a figure that represents the total cost of all TEs.

While providing users of the database with the opportunity to draw comparisons across countries or country groups, we want to be clear that any such comparison should be mindful of different levels of reporting, differences in national benchmark systems and methodological shortcomings of revenue forgone estimations.

Country Income Groups and Regional Classifications are based on the latest World Bank classifications.

Government Revenues in Canada decreased to 44977 CAD Million in March from 51247 CAD Million in February of 2025. This dataset provides - Canada Government Revenues- actual values, historical data, forecast, chart, statistics, economic calendar and news.

Graph and download economic data for National Totals of State and Local Tax Revenue: Total Taxes for the United States (QTAXTOTALQTAXCAT1USNO) from Q1 1992 to Q1 2025 about state & local, revenue, tax, government, and USA.

This dataset presents information on historical central government revenues for 31 countries in Europe and the Americas for the period from 1800 (or independence) to 2012. The countries included are: Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Bolivia, Brazil, Canada, Chile, Colombia, Denmark, Ecuador, Finland, France, Germany (West Germany between 1949 and 1990), Ireland, Italy, Japan, Mexico, New Zealand, Norway, Paraguay, Peru, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, the United States, Uruguay, and Venezuela. In other words, the dataset includes all South American, North American, and Western European countries with a population of more than one million, plus Australia, New Zealand, Japan, and Mexico. The dataset contains information on the public finances of central governments. To make such information comparable cross-nationally the researchers chose to normalize nominal revenue figures in two ways: (i) as a share of the total budget, and (ii) as a share of total gross domestic product. The total tax revenue of the central state is disaggregated guided by the Government Finance Statistics Manual 2001 of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) which provides a classification of types of revenue, and describes in detail the contents of each classification category. Given the paucity of detailed historical data and the needs of our project, researchers combined some subcategories. First, they were interested in total tax revenue, as well as the shares of total revenue coming from direct and indirect taxes. Further, they measured two sub-categories of direct taxation, namely taxes on property and income. For indirect taxes, they separated excises, consumption, and customs.

The GTED collects all publicly available data on tax expenditures (TEs) published by national governments worldwide from 1990 onwards, covering a total of 218 jurisdictions. Based on a step-by-step search process, 121 jurisdictions are currently classified as Non-reporting Jurisdictions. The remaining 97 ones do provide some type of TE data, which was gathered by the GTED team.

Wherever available, the GTED gathers revenue forgone estimates and number of beneficiaries of individual TE provisions. It also gathers metadata including the definition of the TE provision, its legal basis and duration.

Each record in the GTED is classified in four main categories: Tax Base, Policy Objective, Beneficiaries and Type of TE used. In some cases, second- or third-level categories have been introduced. For instance, Fuel Tax data is categorised at the third level within Tax Base: Taxes on Good and Services Excise Taxes Fuel Tax. If the information for a record is not available or unclear, the respective category is classified as Not stated/unclear.

When governments do not publish provision-level data but rather some kind of aggregated information, the GTED gathers this aggregate data. Likewise, if governments report on specific areas of TE only (such as tax incentives for investments, or TEs on income taxes) the GTED presents data on these areas alone. The terms TE reporting or TE report are used broadly, and refer to a large variety of public documents, ranging from annual, comprehensive reports on TEs that are part of governmental budget documentation to individual documents issued by a public body and providing some aggregate information on some specific TE mechanisms. As a minimum requirement, reports must contain some kind of information on the actual use of TE provisions. For instance, a list of available tax deductions for investments, provided by a governmental investment promotion agency, would not be considered a TE report unless they provide revenue forgone estimates or any other data that would allow users of the GTED to obtain information about the actual use of the respective TEs.

The GTED distinguishes regular and irregular reporting. A sequence of reports from 1995 to 2005 would not be considered regular reporting in the GTED, since the country had reported on a yearly basis, but not anymore. Likewise, regular is not necessarily related to annual reporting. Germany, for instance, publishes federal subsidy reports including TE data every two years since 1967. A total of 15 such reports have been issued since 1990, containing data on 29 budget years (until 2018). The GTED counts this as 29 years reported, because data is provided on a year-by-year basis and can be consulted and analysed as such.

The data is processed in a consistent format seeking to increase the level of longitudinal and cross-country comparability. Whereas revenue forgone estimates are provided as reported by governments (in local currency units, current prices), the GTED also provides figures converted into US dollars as well as indicators providing the revenue forgone through TE provisions as shares both of GDP and Tax Revenue – to compute these two indicators, data from the UNU-WIDER Government Revenue Dataset is used as input. The share of revenue forgone as a percentage of Tax Revenue is computed using figures of total tax revenue collected by countries’ central governments. The share of revenue forgone as a percentage of Tax Revenue is computed using figures of total tax revenue collected by countries’ central governments.

Besides all the effort put into ensuring comparability, cross-country analysis of TE data needs to be done cautiously. The main issue, which is inherent to TE data, regards benchmarking. TEs are defined as departures from – usually country-specific – normal tax structures or benchmarks. On this note, the GTED uses the data published by official governmental institutions, sticking to their own definitions of benchmarks, without trying to complement official figures or challenge what different countries consider as the standard tax system or the benchmark.

When it comes to the methodology used by governments to compute the fiscal cost of TE provisions, the vast majority of countries report on TEs based on the revenue forgone approach that estimates the amount by which taxpayers have their tax liabilities reduced as a result of a TE based on their actual current economic behaviour. Since the revenue forgone methodology is static, the potential interconnections between different TE provisions are not taken into account when computing the fiscal cost of TEs based on it. Hence, aggregating revenue forgone estimates of the individual provisions computed separately and without taking behavioural changes into account would not result in a figure that represents the total cost of all TEs.

While providing users of the database with the opportunity to draw comparisons across countries or country groups, we want to be clear that any such comparison should be mindful of different levels of reporting, differences in national benchmark systems and methodological shortcomings of revenue forgone estimations.

Country Income Groups and Regional Classifications are based on the latest World Bank classifications.

Tax Revenue in Argentina increased to 15863000 ARS Million in May from 13682000 ARS Million in April of 2025. This dataset provides - Argentina Tax Revenue- actual values, historical data, forecast, chart, statistics, economic calendar and news.

This dataset contains revenue source level data for revenue actuals. Dataset is intended to match charts and tables in the "Tax Revenue" section of the Mayor`s Message publication. The amount is in millions of dollars. Data are from FY2001 and updated once a year.

USAID's Collecting Taxes Database (CTD) is a compilation of international statistics about taxation designed to provide policymakers, practitioners, and researchers with the means to conduct analysis on domestic revenue mobilization (DRM). It is part of a wider agenda of the international community to help countries strengthen their tax systems and mobilize domestic revenue. The CTD includes information on tax performance and tax administration variables for 200 countries and territories. USAID plans to update the CTD annually. The CTD comprises a set of 30 indicators divided into three main categories -- (1) Tax Rates and Structure; (2) Tax Performance; and (3) Tax Administration -- and includes information on 200 national tax systems. The tax administration indicators examine the main features of the revenue authority.

Government Revenues in Brazil increased to 261265 BRL Million in December from 209218 BRL Million in November of 2024. This dataset provides - Brazil Government Revenues- actual values, historical data, forecast, chart, statistics, economic calendar and news.

The Department of Taxation and Finance annually produces a compilation of the taxes and fees collected by the department. The taxes and fees information provided in this data set are primarily taxes imposed by the Tax Law, but also includes fees that are imposed by other state laws but are administered and collected by the Department. Collections are net of refunds and other processing and accounting adjustments.

This dataset provides values for GOVERNMENT REVENUES reported in several countries. The data includes current values, previous releases, historical highs and record lows, release frequency, reported unit and currency.

USAID's Collecting Taxes Database (CTD) is a compilation of international statistics about taxation designed to provide policymakers, practitioners, and researchers with the means to conduct analysis on domestic revenue mobilization (DRM). It is part of a wider agenda of the international community to help countries strengthen their tax systems and mobilize domestic revenue. The CTD includes information on tax performance and tax administration variables for 200 countries and territories. USAID plans to update the CTD annually. The CTD comprises a set of 30 indicators divided into three main categories -- (1) Tax Rates and Structure; (2) Tax Performance; and (3) Tax Administration -- and includes information on 200 national tax systems. The tax rates and structure indicators capture historical tax rates and thresholds. The tax performance indicators measure how effectively the tax system produces revenues. The CTD Performance Data includes Tax Rates and Structure and Tax Performance data.

This dataset provides values for TAX REVENUE reported in several countries. The data includes current values, previous releases, historical highs and record lows, release frequency, reported unit and currency.

Government Revenues in El Salvador increased to 7065.80 USD Million in 2023 from 6650.90 USD Million in 2022. This dataset provides - El Salvador Government Revenues- actual values, historical data, forecast, chart, statistics, economic calendar and news.

The dataset contains year-wise comparison of direct (income) tax collections and expenditures. The dataset provides a measure of how cost-effective the tax collection process is

This summary table shows, for Budget Receipts, the total amount of activity for the current month, the current fiscal year-to-date, the comparable prior period year-to-date and the budgeted amount estimated for the current fiscal year for various types of receipts (i.e. individual income tax, corporate income tax, etc.). The Budget Outlays section of the table shows the total amount of activity for the current month, the current fiscal year-to-date, the comparable prior period year-to-date and the budgeted amount estimated for the current fiscal year for functions of the federal government. The table also shows the amounts for the budget/surplus deficit categorized as listed above. This table includes total and subtotal rows that should be excluded when aggregating data. Some rows represent elements of the dataset's hierarchy, but are not assigned values. The classification_id for each of these elements can be used as the parent_id for underlying data elements to calculate their implied values. Subtotal rows are available to access this same information.

This dataset consists of revenue received by the Fulton County government broken down by source, program (unit) and year. Fulton County revenues have six major sources: taxes, intergovernmental, licenses and permits, charges for services, fines and forfeitures, and other revenues. The dataset includes revenue from all sources for the previous four years plus year-to-date revenue for the current year.